diff --git a/apps/web/src/lib/findingPresentation.ts b/apps/web/src/lib/findingPresentation.ts
index 663fe955..bf320a9c 100644
--- a/apps/web/src/lib/findingPresentation.ts
+++ b/apps/web/src/lib/findingPresentation.ts
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ import type { Finding } from "@dockermap/contracts";
  */
 export interface FindingPresentation {
   title: string;
+  summary: string;
   category: string;
   hint: string;
   recommendation: string;
@@ -60,6 +61,14 @@ const SPECS: readonly FindingSpec[] = [
     evidenceCount: 1, evidence: { version: 1, provider: "docker", kind: "docker_daemon_state_bind_mount", assertionKind: "observed", providerSlot: null },
     title: "Docker daemon-state access needs review", category: "Docker daemon state", hint: "Observed Docker fact", tone: "warn", severityLabel: "Warning"
   },
+  {
+    ruleId: "docker.daemon_state_bind_mount_publishes_port", severity: "warning",
+    summary: "A container with Docker daemon state access also has a published host port.",
+    recommendation: "Review whether the daemon-state access and host-port publication are both intended.",
+    idPrefix: "finding_docker_daemon_state_bind_mount_publishes_port_", subjectPrefix: "docker_container_", targetRef: "host_risk_docker_daemon_state",
+    evidenceCount: 2, evidence: { version: 1, provider: "docker", kind: "docker_daemon_state_bind_mount", assertionKind: "observed", providerSlot: null },
+    title: "Docker daemon-state and host-port publication need review", category: "Docker daemon state + host port", hint: "Observed Docker facts", tone: "warn", severityLabel: "Warning", inspectChanges: true
+  },
   {
     ruleId: "docker.compose_declared_target_not_active", severity: "advisory",
     summary: "A running Docker Compose service declares a dependency whose container is not active.",
@@ -100,7 +109,7 @@ export function presentationForFinding(value: unknown): FindingPresentation | nu
     // The API permits the Compose observation's legacy absent slot as well as
     // null. Both mean the Docker-wide collector, never a provider-supplied
     // slot name; all other supported shapes require their exact slot value.
-    || (spec.ruleId === "docker.compose_declared_target_not_active"
+    || ((spec.ruleId === "docker.compose_declared_target_not_active" || spec.ruleId === "docker.daemon_state_bind_mount_publishes_port")
       ? evidence.providerSlot !== undefined && evidence.providerSlot !== null
       : evidence.providerSlot !== spec.evidence.providerSlot)
     || evidence.freshness !== "fresh"
@@ -115,5 +124,18 @@ export function presentationForFinding(value: unknown): FindingPresentation | nu
       || port.subjectRef !== finding.subjectRef) return null;
   }
 
+  // The daemon-state + host-port advisory is a paired observation from one
+  // Docker collection. The UI never renders either fact's values, but it must
+  // not present the static warning if the opaque pair is incomplete, crossed,
+  // stale, or from different observations. Version-one Docker evidence may
+  // omit its legacy null slot at the browser boundary.
+  if (spec.ruleId === "docker.daemon_state_bind_mount_publishes_port") {
+    const port = record(finding.evidenceRefs[1]);
+    if (!port || port.version !== 1 || port.provider !== "docker" || port.kind !== "docker_port_publication"
+      || port.assertionKind !== "observed" || (port.providerSlot !== undefined && port.providerSlot !== null)
+      || port.freshness !== "fresh" || port.subjectRef !== finding.subjectRef
+      || port.collectedAt !== evidence.collectedAt || port.providerRevision !== evidence.providerRevision) return null;
+  }
+
   return spec;
 }
diff --git a/apps/web/src/screens/Findings.tsx b/apps/web/src/screens/Findings.tsx
index 2a324e62..6b865f60 100644
--- a/apps/web/src/screens/Findings.tsx
+++ b/apps/web/src/screens/Findings.tsx
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ export default function Findings() {
             if (!presentation) return null;
             return <Panel key={`${finding.ruleId}-${index}`} title={presentation.title} icon="alert" hint={presentation.hint}>
               <div className="tag-wrap"><Tag tone={presentation.tone}>{presentation.severityLabel}</Tag><Tag tone="muted">{presentation.category}</Tag></div>
+              <p className="muted-copy">{presentation.summary}</p>
               <p className="muted-copy">{presentation.recommendation}</p>
               {presentation.inspectChanges && <Link className="ghost-link" to="/changes">Inspect recent changes <Icon name="arrow" size={14} /></Link>}
             </Panel>;
diff --git a/apps/web/src/screens/findings.test.tsx b/apps/web/src/screens/findings.test.tsx
index dcdb2815..256ca210 100644
--- a/apps/web/src/screens/findings.test.tsx
+++ b/apps/web/src/screens/findings.test.tsx
@@ -130,14 +130,86 @@ describe("Findings screen", () => {
     expect(html).toContain("Review the declared dependency and the target container state.");
   });
 
+  it("renders daemon-state host-port advice with static generic copy and a changes link", () => {
+    const daemonStatePort = structuredClone(findings);
+    daemonStatePort.findings[0] = {
+      id: "finding_docker_daemon_state_bind_mount_publishes_port_docker_container_redacted",
+      ruleId: "docker.daemon_state_bind_mount_publishes_port",
+      severity: "warning",
+      summary: "A container with Docker daemon state access also has a published host port.",
+      recommendation: "Review whether the daemon-state access and host-port publication are both intended.",
+      subjectRef: "docker_container_redacted", targetRef: "host_risk_docker_daemon_state",
+      evidenceRefs: [
+        { version: 1, id: "mount-path-secret", provider: "docker", kind: "docker_daemon_state_bind_mount", assertionKind: "observed", summary: "provider-text-secret", subjectRef: "docker_container_redacted", collectedAt: 1, providerRevision: "opaque-pair", providerSlot: null, freshness: "fresh" },
+        { version: 1, id: "host-port-secret", provider: "docker", kind: "docker_port_publication", assertionKind: "observed", summary: "provider-text-secret", subjectRef: "docker_container_redacted", collectedAt: 1, providerRevision: "opaque-pair", providerSlot: null, freshness: "fresh" }
+      ]
+    };
+    const html = render({ findings: daemonStatePort });
+    expect(html).toContain("Docker daemon-state and host-port publication need review");
+    expect(html).toContain("A container with Docker daemon state access also has a published host port.");
+    expect(html).toContain("Review whether the daemon-state access and host-port publication are both intended.");
+    expect(html).toContain('href="/changes"');
+    for (const hidden of ["docker_container_redacted", "mount-path-secret", "host-port-secret", "provider-text-secret", "opaque-pair"]) expect(html).not.toContain(hidden);
+  });
+
+  it("accepts the legacy omitted V1 Docker provider slots for a coherent daemon-state host-port pair", () => {
+    const daemonStatePort = structuredClone(findings);
+    daemonStatePort.findings[0] = {
+      id: "finding_docker_daemon_state_bind_mount_publishes_port_docker_container_legacy",
+      ruleId: "docker.daemon_state_bind_mount_publishes_port", severity: "warning",
+      summary: "A container with Docker daemon state access also has a published host port.",
+      recommendation: "Review whether the daemon-state access and host-port publication are both intended.",
+      subjectRef: "docker_container_legacy", targetRef: "host_risk_docker_daemon_state",
+      evidenceRefs: [
+        { version: 1, id: "opaque-mount", provider: "docker", kind: "docker_daemon_state_bind_mount", assertionKind: "observed", summary: "opaque", subjectRef: "docker_container_legacy", collectedAt: 1, providerRevision: "opaque", providerSlot: null, freshness: "fresh" },
+        { version: 1, id: "opaque-port", provider: "docker", kind: "docker_port_publication", assertionKind: "observed", summary: "opaque", subjectRef: "docker_container_legacy", collectedAt: 1, providerRevision: "opaque", providerSlot: null, freshness: "fresh" }
+      ]
+    };
+    for (const evidence of daemonStatePort.findings[0].evidenceRefs) delete (evidence as { providerSlot?: unknown }).providerSlot;
+    const html = render({ findings: daemonStatePort });
+    expect(html).toContain("Docker daemon-state and host-port publication need review");
+  });
+
+  it("fails closed for malformed or mismatched daemon-state host-port pairs", () => {
+    const daemonStatePort = structuredClone(findings);
+    daemonStatePort.findings[0] = {
+      id: "finding_docker_daemon_state_bind_mount_publishes_port_docker_container_pair",
+      ruleId: "docker.daemon_state_bind_mount_publishes_port", severity: "warning",
+      summary: "A container with Docker daemon state access also has a published host port.",
+      recommendation: "Review whether the daemon-state access and host-port publication are both intended.",
+      subjectRef: "docker_container_pair", targetRef: "host_risk_docker_daemon_state",
+      evidenceRefs: [
+        { version: 1, id: "opaque-mount", provider: "docker", kind: "docker_daemon_state_bind_mount", assertionKind: "observed", summary: "opaque", subjectRef: "docker_container_pair", collectedAt: 1, providerRevision: "first", providerSlot: null, freshness: "fresh" },
+        { version: 1, id: "opaque-port", provider: "docker", kind: "docker_port_publication", assertionKind: "observed", summary: "opaque", subjectRef: "docker_container_other", collectedAt: 2, providerRevision: "second", providerSlot: null, freshness: "fresh" }
+      ]
+    };
+    const html = render({ findings: daemonStatePort });
+    expect(html).not.toContain("Docker daemon-state and host-port publication need review");
+    expect(html).not.toContain("docker_container_pair");
+    expect(html).not.toContain("docker_container_other");
+  });
+
   it("suppresses findings in demo and mock contexts even if fixture data is injected", () => {
+    const daemonStatePort = structuredClone(findings);
+    daemonStatePort.findings[0] = {
+      id: "finding_docker_daemon_state_bind_mount_publishes_port_docker_container_fixture",
+      ruleId: "docker.daemon_state_bind_mount_publishes_port", severity: "warning",
+      summary: "A container with Docker daemon state access also has a published host port.",
+      recommendation: "Review whether the daemon-state access and host-port publication are both intended.",
+      subjectRef: "docker_container_fixture", targetRef: "host_risk_docker_daemon_state",
+      evidenceRefs: [
+        { version: 1, id: "opaque-mount", provider: "docker", kind: "docker_daemon_state_bind_mount", assertionKind: "observed", summary: "opaque", subjectRef: "docker_container_fixture", collectedAt: 1, providerRevision: "opaque", providerSlot: null, freshness: "fresh" },
+        { version: 1, id: "opaque-port", provider: "docker", kind: "docker_port_publication", assertionKind: "observed", summary: "opaque", subjectRef: "docker_container_fixture", collectedAt: 1, providerRevision: "opaque", providerSlot: null, freshness: "fresh" }
+      ]
+    };
     for (const context of [
       { evidenceMode: "demo" as const, modelProvenance: "demo" as const },
       { evidenceMode: "mock" as const, modelProvenance: "mock" as const }
     ]) {
-      const html = render({ findings, ...context });
+      const html = render({ findings: daemonStatePort, ...context });
       expect(html).toContain("Live evidence is not established");
-      expect(html).not.toContain("Declared dependency needs review");
+      expect(html).not.toContain("Docker daemon-state and host-port publication need review");
+      expect(html).not.toContain("docker_container_fixture");
     }
   });
 });