diff --git a/.github/actions/prune-repository/prune.py b/.github/actions/prune-repository/prune.py index 891da3fdfe2..ddb55e9fbe9 100644 --- a/.github/actions/prune-repository/prune.py +++ b/.github/actions/prune-repository/prune.py @@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/scripts", ], + # The app's condition-5 test executes the evaluation runner as a child + # process; the context root is not a workspace and must be copied explicitly. + "@apps/brunch-agent": ["libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations"], } TURBO_QUERY = """ diff --git a/.github/actions/prune-repository/prune_test.py b/.github/actions/prune-repository/prune_test.py index 8e2722cb52a..d0843f1b07f 100644 --- a/.github/actions/prune-repository/prune_test.py +++ b/.github/actions/prune-repository/prune_test.py @@ -31,13 +31,21 @@ def test_core_job_adds_the_app_and_context_paths(self) -> None: self.assertEqual( extra_paths_for_requested({CORE}), [ + ".config/oxlint/brunch", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/scripts", ], ) + def test_app_job_adds_the_baseline_evaluation_paths(self) -> None: + self.assertEqual( + extra_paths_for_requested({APP}), + ["libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations"], + ) + def test_sibling_or_website_job_does_not_add_brunch_extras(self) -> None: self.assertEqual(extras_for_requested({TRANSPORT}), frozenset()) self.assertEqual(extras_for_requested({WEBSITE}), frozenset()) diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/package.json b/apps/brunch-agent/package.json index cf9c5d37003..637dc659233 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/package.json +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/package.json @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ "license": "AGPL-3.0", "type": "module", "scripts": { + "baseline:harness": "node --experimental-strip-types ../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/harness-run.ts", "build": "vite build && vite build --config vite.client.config.ts", "dev": "vite dev", "fix:eslint": "oxlint --fix --type-aware --type-check --report-unused-disable-directives-severity=error .", diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/sdcpn-elicitor.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/sdcpn-elicitor.ts index d0858804085..9609c98e7ae 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/sdcpn-elicitor.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/sdcpn-elicitor.ts @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ * The SDCPN elicitor (spec §12.5: one agent per target). * * The second entry in the target gallery, and the first whose plugin is a - * file: `@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn` loads `plugin.md` and the - * harness reads its three tables (ADR-0006). This module is as thin as the + * file: `@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn` loads `plugin.yaml` and the + * harness reads its cells (ADR-0006, ADR-0007). This module is as thin as the * gherkin one — it mounts harness capability and holds no elicitation * semantics of its own; what the interviewer asks, demands, and treats as * complete all comes from the plugin file through the binding. @@ -22,8 +22,15 @@ import { sdcpn } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn"; import { createSdcpnElicitationSession } from "../elicitation-session.ts"; -/** One definition for the agent and any faux provider alike (see the gherkin elicitor). */ -export const SDCPN_MODEL_ID = "claude-haiku-4-5"; +/** + * One definition for the agent and any faux provider alike (see the gherkin + * elicitor). `BRUNCH_SDCPN_MODEL` overrides the default so an evaluation + * runner can drive this same agent with a stronger model without a second + * agent definition; the override is read once, at module load, like the rest + * of the agent's static configuration. + */ +export const SDCPN_MODEL_ID = + process.env["BRUNCH_SDCPN_MODEL"] || "claude-haiku-4-5"; const sdcpnElicitorInitialData = v.object({ targetDocumentId: v.pipe(v.string(), v.nonEmpty()), diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/baseline-harness.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/baseline-harness.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7f7d6e614d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/baseline-harness.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +import { mkdtemp, readFile, rm, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises"; +import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; +import { join } from "node:path"; + +import { afterEach, expect, test } from "vitest"; + +import { + CLOSING_TEXT, + EXPERT_OBJECTIVE_QUOTE, + FIRST_QUESTION, + SECOND_QUESTION, +} from "./fixtures/baseline-harness-interviewer.ts"; +import { runNodeScript } from "./run-node-script"; + +import type { HarnessRunRecord } from "../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/harness-run.ts"; + +const testDirectory = import.meta.dirname; +const contextRoot = join( + testDirectory, + "../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", +); +const runner = join( + contextRoot, + "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/harness-run.ts", +); +const expertStub = join( + contextRoot, + "packages/core/test/architecture/fixtures/baseline-anthropic-stub.ts", +); +const interviewer = join( + testDirectory, + "fixtures/baseline-harness-interviewer.ts", +); + +const temporaryDirectories: string[] = []; +afterEach(async () => { + await Promise.all( + temporaryDirectories + .splice(0) + .map((directory) => rm(directory, { recursive: true, force: true })), + ); +}); + +test("condition 5 drives the shipped elicitor through the binding and reads the harness's facts back", async () => { + const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-baseline-c5-test-"), + ); + temporaryDirectories.push(outputDirectory); + const expertReplies = [ + { text: EXPERT_OBJECTIVE_QUOTE }, + { text: "Better is fewer late promises, then fewer changeovers." }, + { text: "Alright. Anything else?" }, + { text: "Then I'll get back to the floor." }, + { text: "Cheers." }, + ]; + // The shared expert stub reads its scripted replies from a file, never inline. + const expertRepliesPath = join(outputDirectory, "expert-replies.json"); + await writeFile(expertRepliesPath, JSON.stringify(expertReplies)); + + const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runner, + join(testDirectory, "../../.."), + { + BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR: outputDirectory, + BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: expertStub, + BRUNCH_BASELINE_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE: interviewer, + BASELINE_STUB_REPLIES_PATH: expertRepliesPath, + BRUNCH_SDCPN_MODEL: "claude-haiku-4-5", + }, + ); + expect(exitCode, stderr).toBe(0); + + const run = JSON.parse( + await readFile(join(outputDirectory, "condition-5.raw.json"), "utf8"), + ) as HarnessRunRecord; + + // Turn 1 asks; the expert's reply is bound to that ask on the next dispatch. + expect(run.turns[0]?.pendingQuestion).toBe(FIRST_QUESTION); + expect(run.turns[0]?.expert?.content).toBe(EXPERT_OBJECTIVE_QUOTE); + expect( + run.turns[1]?.signals.some( + (signal) => signal.tagName === "affordance-reply-bound", + ), + ).toBe(true); + + // Turn 2 sweeps the settled range: one capture applied, completion reported + // by the harness, and the second question left pending. + const sweep = run.turns[1]?.sweeps[0]; + expect(sweep?.status).toBe("applied"); + expect(sweep?.appliedCaptureIds).toHaveLength(1); + expect(sweep?.completion).toMatchObject({ complete: false }); + expect(run.turns[1]?.pendingQuestion).toBe(SECOND_QUESTION); + expect(run.turns[1]?.completion).toMatchObject({ + captures: 1, + complete: false, + }); + + // Then the interviewer closes without asking; the runner counts three such + // turns before the wrap and declares the interview stalled — no classifier. + expect(run.turns.slice(2).map((turn) => turn.text)).toEqual([ + expect.arrayContaining([CLOSING_TEXT]), + expect.arrayContaining([CLOSING_TEXT]), + expect.arrayContaining([CLOSING_TEXT]), + ]); + expect( + run.turns.slice(2).every((turn) => turn.pendingQuestion === undefined), + ).toBe(true); + expect(run.stopReason).toBe("stalled"); + expect(run.turns).toHaveLength(5); + expect(run.usage.interviewer.calls).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(5); + expect(run.usage.expert.calls).toBe(4); + + // The store is the deliverable: the one capture, quoting the expert verbatim. + expect(run.store.captures).toHaveLength(1); + const [captures, model, transcript, system] = await Promise.all([ + readFile(join(outputDirectory, "condition-5-captures.json"), "utf8"), + readFile(join(outputDirectory, "condition-5-model.md"), "utf8"), + readFile(join(outputDirectory, "condition-5.md"), "utf8"), + readFile(join(outputDirectory, "condition-5-system.md"), "utf8"), + ]); + expect(captures).toContain(EXPERT_OBJECTIVE_QUOTE); + expect(model).toContain("### objective (1)"); + expect(model).toContain("Complete: **no**"); + expect(transcript).toContain("Stop reason: stalled"); + expect(transcript).toContain("> harness — sweep applied; applied 1"); + expect(transcript).toContain(FIRST_QUESTION); + expect(system).toContain("brunch_ask"); +}); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/fixtures/baseline-harness-interviewer.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/fixtures/baseline-harness-interviewer.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7dea6d0beeb --- /dev/null +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/fixtures/baseline-harness-interviewer.ts @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +/** + * A scripted interviewer for the condition-5 harness runner's hermetic test. + * + * Loaded by `harness-run.ts` through `BRUNCH_BASELINE_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE` + * as the runtime's only provider. The responses are decided from what the + * model can see, not from a fixed sequence, so the fixture stays correct + * however many model calls the binding's settlement nudge adds to a turn: + * + * 1. no ask yet → ask the objective question + * 2. an answer, no sweep → sweep; the extraction call gets one proposal + * 3. sweep applied → ask a second question + * 4. anything after that → close with text and no question, until the + * runner declares the interview stalled + */ + +import { + fauxAssistantMessage, + fauxProvider, + fauxToolCall, + type Context, +} from "@earendil-works/pi-ai"; + +import { toolName } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent"; + +import { SDCPN_MODEL_ID } from "../../src/agents/sdcpn-elicitor.ts"; + +import type { SlotAssertedProposalInput } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn"; + +export const FIRST_QUESTION = + "What decision are you trying to get right, in your own words?"; +export const SECOND_QUESTION = + "When two orders compete for the same line, what does 'better' mean to you?"; +export const CLOSING_TEXT = + "Thank you — I have what I need for now and no further questions."; +/** The expert stub's first reply; the extraction quotes it verbatim. */ +export const EXPERT_OBJECTIVE_QUOTE = + "Which job should each line run next so the week's promises hold."; + +const ask = toolName("ask"); +const sweep = toolName("sweep"); + +const objectiveProposal: SlotAssertedProposalInput = { + evidence: [{ excerpt: EXPERT_OBJECTIVE_QUOTE }], + epistemicStatus: "explicit", + confidence: "firm", + content: { + value: { + type: "slot-asserted", + kind: "objective", + node: "which job next", + slot: "the question, in the expert's words", + precision: "spelled out", + assertion: { value: EXPERT_OBJECTIVE_QUOTE }, + }, + }, +}; + +const countToolCalls = (context: Context, name: string): number => { + let count = 0; + for (const message of context.messages) { + if (message.role !== "assistant") continue; + for (const block of message.content) { + if (block.type === "toolCall" && block.name === name) count += 1; + } + } + return count; +}; + +const faux = fauxProvider({ + provider: "anthropic", + models: [{ id: SDCPN_MODEL_ID }], +}); + +faux.setResponses( + Array.from({ length: 64 }, () => (context: Context) => { + if (context.tools?.some((tool) => tool.name === "finish")) { + return fauxAssistantMessage( + [fauxToolCall("finish", { proposals: [objectiveProposal] })], + { stopReason: "toolUse" }, + ); + } + const asks = countToolCalls(context, ask); + const sweeps = countToolCalls(context, sweep); + if (asks === 0) { + return fauxAssistantMessage( + [fauxToolCall(ask, { question: FIRST_QUESTION })], + { stopReason: "toolUse" }, + ); + } + if (sweeps === 0) { + return fauxAssistantMessage([fauxToolCall(sweep, {})], { + stopReason: "toolUse", + }); + } + if (asks === 1) { + return fauxAssistantMessage( + [fauxToolCall(ask, { question: SECOND_QUESTION })], + { stopReason: "toolUse" }, + ); + } + return fauxAssistantMessage(CLOSING_TEXT); + }), +); + +export default faux.provider; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/run-node-script.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/run-node-script.ts index 4ef2e623d99..b0648b20460 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/run-node-script.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/run-node-script.ts @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ interface NodeScriptResult { export const runNodeScript = async ( scriptPath: string, cwd: string, + env: Readonly> = {}, ): Promise => new Promise((resolve, reject) => { const child = spawn( @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ export const runNodeScript = async ( ["--experimental-strip-types", scriptPath], { cwd, + env: { ...process.env, ...env }, stdio: ["ignore", "pipe", "pipe"], }, ); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/turbo.json b/apps/brunch-agent/turbo.json index 5587a8d0535..c1f0446a71c 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/turbo.json +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/turbo.json @@ -1,6 +1,17 @@ { "extends": ["//"], "tasks": { + "baseline:harness": { + "dependsOn": ["^build"], + "cache": false, + "passThroughEnv": [ + "ANTHROPIC_API_KEY", + "BRUNCH_SDCPN_MODEL", + "BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE", + "BRUNCH_BASELINE_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE", + "BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR" + ] + }, "build": { "dependsOn": ["^build"], "outputs": ["dist/**"], diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md index 129149986e5..0c0c58d9ad1 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md @@ -43,7 +43,8 @@ workspace. Route by trigger; load only the applicable compact protocol: - Start or resume without a proof target, or when objectives, pressure, proof, authority, external - gates, frontier value, or arc-close findings change: `docs/agents/steering.md`. + gates, frontier value, or arc-close findings change: invoke `/ds-steer`, which consults the Brunch + supplement at `docs/agents/steering.md`. - Create, mutate, triage, or structure issues: `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`, `docs/agents/issue-writing.md`, and `docs/agents/triage-labels.md`. - Add, move, settle, or index documents: `docs/agents/documentation.md`. @@ -52,5 +53,6 @@ Route by trigger; load only the applicable compact protocol: - Produce a significant agent-authored artifact or proof: `docs/agents/legibility.md`. - Make an architecture-sensitive move: `docs/agents/posture.md`. - Operate on branches, stacks, commits, or PRs: `docs/agents/git-workflow.md`. +- Create or refresh worktrees for a recorded partition: `docs/agents/partition-worktrees.md`. - Close a work arc: run the context-local `arc-close` skill and `docs/agents/arc-close.md`. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md index c06cebebc62..8134009a737 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ The artifact family a plugin projects into (Gherkin scenarios, SDCPNs, assurance _Avoid_: target-domain (retired — "domain" now names the expert's operational system, below), target-paradigm; bare "target" where family/instance is ambiguous **Domain**: -The operational system the expert knows and the model describes — a packaging line, a truck fleet, a coating plant. Unknown before the conversation starts and discovered during it; never a plugin unit, a heading, a row, or a noun in a plugin file. +The operational system the expert knows and the model describes — a packaging line, a truck fleet, a coating plant. Unknown before the conversation starts and discovered during it; never a plugin unit, a key, a row, or a noun in a plugin definition. _Avoid_: target-domain, use case (as a synonym), scenario (a scenario is assembled from boundary conditions at simulation time) **Target-document**: @@ -153,6 +153,94 @@ The narrow injected context through which a plugin receives harness capabilities **Storage port**: The harness-defined contract for the capture store (atomic sweep application, envelope invariants as store-level refusals), implemented by the binding for its deploy target. Plugins are storage-blind. In code the port's type is `CaptureStore` (`packages/core/src/capture-store.ts`) — grep for that, not for "storage port". Scope includes the **session-log archive** (archive-on-read; spec §9.6): session logs live with the target-document, retained indefinitely — the substrate's conversation store is the live transport copy, never the provenance record. +### Strategic control + +**Concern**: +A durable question, invariant, risk, assumption, design axis, or obligation that can govern work +across several temporary activities. +_Avoid_: issue (an issue can be one temporary activity acting on a concern) + +**Steering projection**: +A bounded map, issue, proof, or decision activity created to investigate or act on a concern. The +qualified term keeps steering usage distinct from the IR's projection register. +_Avoid_: projection (unqualified in strategic-control prose), concern record + +**Operative force**: +What a governing concern presently requires work to preserve, avoid, test, or account for. +_Avoid_: status, priority + +**Commission**: +The relationship by which a strategic owner gives a map its intended contribution, governing +concerns, and related-map context. +_Avoid_: request, assignment + +**Landing**: +A map's terminal account of its outcome, strategic changes, durable dispositions, affected maps, +and residual uncertainty. Landing precedes reconciliation and does not itself close a commissioned +map or resolve its concerns. +_Avoid_: closure, completion report + +**Journey**: +The causal strategic change between a map's commission and landing that future navigation still +needs, excluding operational chronology. +_Avoid_: history, activity log + +**Move**: +One bounded change within a selected frontier, with its own landing but not necessarily its own +proof. Several moves are **joined** when they are proven together by one named proof (the +`ds-steering` join): they may be built in parallel worktrees, but none is done until the joint +proof runs. G0's wiring, persistence, latency-floor, and legible-surface work are joined moves. +_Avoid_: stream (for work that shares a proof), phase, task, effort (an effort is a checkout) + +**Stream**: +A line of work that runs in parallel with the selected frontier, has its own projection and its +own proof, and neither blocks nor is blocked by the frontier's joint proof. The plugin design loop +and the package-topology ADR are streams beside G0. The epicentre map's older word for the same +thing is "lane"; it is retained there and not used for new writing. +_Avoid_: lane (new writing), workstream, track, effort + +**Partition**: +Brunch execution layout, made after the proof frontier is selected: which **efforts** get +worktrees, their write sets, join points, re-braid points, and base. Moves and streams do not map +one-to-one onto efforts (W1 carries G0.1 and G0.2; the driver retains G0.4). Recorded in +`docs/control/STEERING.md` and revised at every steering pass; it never changes which frontier is +selected. Brunch extension of `/ds-steer` step 5 (`docs/agents/steering.md`). Not Dogsled +vocabulary. +_Avoid_: plan (the partition is one section of the strategic control, not a plan document), +breakdown (that is ticket decomposition, `/ds-write-tickets`), parallelisation + +**Effort**: +The checkout unit of a partition: a worktree with a disjoint write set except at named join +points. It may carry one or more joined moves, or a stream; those remain proof and strategy, not +the effort. Deferred work is not an effort. The partition is recorded in +`docs/control/STEERING.md`. +_Avoid_: stream, move, branch (the effort is the worktree, not its Git ref) + +**Driver**: +The worktree that owns control documents and Linear. Other efforts deposit through issue comments, +commit and PR bodies, and evidence under their own path; the driver reconciles at each landing. +The current HASH clone is the driver until a partition says otherwise. +_Avoid_: main worktree, primary, orchestrator + +**Join point**: +A file, package, or manifest two efforts both write, with the order in which they land. Control +documents and Linear are written only from the driver worktree and are therefore never join points. +_Avoid_: conflict (a join point is planned; a conflict is what happens when it was not) + +**Re-braid**: +The planned moment when diverging effort branches are restacked onto a shared base and conflicts +resolved, before they diverge again. Brunch-local; not a Dogsled term. How long a line may run +unbraided follows how fine the tickets are, not a ticket count. Three relationships stay distinct: +the **proof join** (moves demonstrated together), the **join point** (shared file, landing order), +and the **re-braid** (git-line meeting). +_Avoid_: rebase (the git verb a re-braid uses), sync, integrate, restack checkpoint (the generic +gloss; keep re-braid here) + +**Sequence**: +Ordered goals where each goal's proof is the precondition of the next (G0 → G1 → G2). Ordering +inside a sequence is strategic, not mechanical availability. +_Avoid_: roadmap, phases, streams + ### September demo **Demo shell**: diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md index fe09a825b63..fdfaac923f6 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md @@ -13,9 +13,12 @@ This directory is its context and agent-session root, not a package workspace: - [`packages/core/`](./packages/core/) is `@hashintel/brunch-agent`. - [`packages/binding-flue/`](./packages/binding-flue/) is the Flue binding. - [`packages/transport-aisdk/`](./packages/transport-aisdk/) is the AI SDK transport. -- [`packages/plugin-gherkin/`](./packages/plugin-gherkin/) is the Gherkin target plugin. -- [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/`](./packages/plugin-sdcpn/) is the SDCPN target plugin: `plugin.md` and its - slot-assertion proposal type. +- [`packages/repertoire/`](./packages/repertoire/) is the harness repertoire: the default teaching + for every guidance and runbook key (ADR-0007), rendered by bindings, never imported by plugins. +- [`packages/plugin-gherkin/`](./packages/plugin-gherkin/) is the Gherkin target plugin: a + feature-anchored `plugin.yaml` and the verbatim-floor proposal type. +- [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/`](./packages/plugin-sdcpn/) is the SDCPN target plugin: an + objective-anchored `plugin.yaml` and its slot-assertion proposal type. - [`../../../apps/brunch-agent/`](../../../apps/brunch-agent/) is the remote server and diagnostic application. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md index 19750651af5..81c96c6ce46 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md @@ -7,8 +7,9 @@ settlement) · `active` (artifact of a live effort) · `settled` (permanent home copy lives outside the repo). The authoritative role topology is defined by the documentation protocol. The role-based zones -below are authoritative. Agent protocols are registered through `AGENTS.md`; the strategic -control loop is [`docs/agents/steering.md`](agents/steering.md). +below are authoritative. Agent protocols are registered through `AGENTS.md`; Brunch's supplement +to `/ds-steer` is [`docs/agents/steering.md`](agents/steering.md); cutting worktrees for a recorded +partition is [`docs/agents/partition-worktrees.md`](agents/partition-worktrees.md). ## Inbox (awaiting settlement) @@ -39,7 +40,7 @@ control loop is [`docs/agents/steering.md`](agents/steering.md). | [map.md](archive/elicitation-kernel/map.md) | settled | **mirrored in full**: FE-1366 | Completed wayfinder map | | [issues/](archive/elicitation-kernel/issues) 01–13 | settled | **mirrored in full**: FE-1367–FE-1379 (relations preserved) | 13 resolved tickets | | [notes/consistency-prepass](archive/elicitation-kernel/notes/consistency-prepass-2026-08-10.md) | settled | none | Pre-assembly contradiction audit (7 contradictions, adjudicated in spec Appendix A) | -| [plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft](archive/specs/plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft.md) | superseded | FE-1431; FE-1405 | Archive copy of the pre-ADR-0006 plugin contract: two schemas and two tables, `ScopeExpr`/`where`/`inSupport`, `firesWhen`, `completionAnchor`, typed fold/demand/variant/loss declarations; replaced by the per-formalism plugin file (`specs/plugin-contract.md`, `packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md`) | +| [plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft](archive/specs/plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft.md) | superseded | FE-1431; FE-1405 | Archive copy of the pre-ADR-0006 plugin contract: two schemas and two tables, `ScopeExpr`/`where`/`inSupport`, `firesWhen`, `completionAnchor`, typed fold/demand/variant/loss declarations; replaced by the per-formalism plugin file (`specs/plugin-contract.md`, `packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`) | | [elicitation-completion-2026-08-25-full-draft](archive/specs/elicitation-completion-2026-08-25-full-draft.md) | superseded | FE-1402 | Archive copy of the pre-ADR-0006 completion draft: CPS DemandTable, `where`-scoped presence/slot clauses, completion-anchor matching, full deferral-licensing schemas; replaced by the `evaluateCompletion` invariants in `specs/elicitation-completion.md` | ## Process-model elicitation artifacts (FE-1357) @@ -62,24 +63,25 @@ control loop is [`docs/agents/steering.md`](agents/steering.md). | [research/elicitation-strategy-literature](reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md) | active | gisted in FE-1360 resolution | Literature synthesis, 9 sections, verification-labeled | | [research/re-interviewing-literature-worker-report](reference/research/elicitation/interviewing-literature-source-catalog.md) | active | noted on FE-1361 | Verbatim instruments: 34-mistake taxonomy, question typologies, LLM-interviewer results | | [research/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue](reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md) | active | FE-1407 | Test-oracle list for the harness (reclassified 2026-08-25 as test-bed material, not authority): typed frontier-model failure catalogue from the two baseline transcripts and indexed literature — mechanism, detection signature, accountable layer, bounded prevention claim, and the licensed-deferral boundary | -| [baseline evaluation evidence](evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/) | settled | gisted in FE-1361 resolution | Immutable baseline-control evidence: both transcripts, raw snapshots, delivered models, and scored read-out; with the executable cases and protocol under `evaluations/` it is the simulated-expert harness for the walking-skeleton run (reclassified 2026-08-25 as test-bed material) | +| [baseline evaluation evidence](evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/) | active | gisted in FE-1361 resolution; FE-1431 | Baseline-control evidence: transcripts, raw snapshots, delivered models, and scored read-out for conditions 1, 2, (2026-08-25) 4 — the rendered teaching layer as prompt only — and (2026-08-25) 5 — the shipped harness in the loop, transcripts and folded store committed, read-out pending review, with a (2026-08-26) turn latency assessment (`condition-5-turn-latency.md`: 145 s/turn, 97% extraction, actions R0–R5) that STEERING carries as an immediate concern; with the executable cases and protocol under `evaluations/` it is the simulated-expert harness for the walking-skeleton run (reclassified 2026-08-25 as test-bed material) | | [ir-design](specs/intermediate-representation.md) | active | gisted in FE-1364 resolution; amended by FE-1480 | The IR design: Layer A (ratified on worked examples, FE-1397; definition sentence amended by ADR-0003) + the CPS plugin's ten-kind payload, deterministic scaffold and obligation contract (Layer B); executable code is realized downstream under ADR-0005 | | [ir-worked-examples](evidence/proofs/design/intermediate-representation-worked-examples.md) | active | gisted in FE-1397 | Layer-A validation across Gherkin/CPS/BPMN + assurance: property verdicts, amendments, sublimation findings | -| [ir-design-plain](specs/intermediate-representation-plain.md) | active | strain findings on FE-1401; amended by FE-1480 | Plain-prose rendering of the IR design, including ADR-0005's split between deterministic scaffolding and model-assisted executable realization; notes that `plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md` is now the concrete rendering of Layer B | +| [ir-design-plain](specs/intermediate-representation-plain.md) | active | strain findings on FE-1401; amended by FE-1480 | Plain-prose rendering of the IR design, including ADR-0005's split between deterministic scaffolding and model-assisted executable realization; notes that `plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml` is now the concrete rendering of Layer B | | [notes/research-patterns-audit](evidence/proofs/audits/research-patterns-audit.md) | active | FE-1401 / card inputs on FE-1403 | Plain-language audit of ~30 research imports in 7 families, evidence-graded, with an 8-point strain appendix | | [notes/harness-teaching-lineage-audit](evidence/proofs/audits/harness-teaching-lineage-audit.md) | active | FE-1406 (owning issue); input to ADR-0007 | Audit of every prior form of "what the harness teaches" (2026-08-06 → 08-25): fifteen restatements, the vocabulary each used, the layer each chose, and what became of it; finds the §11.5 split rule affirmed at every station and designed at none, the moves never enumerated in canon, and the SDCPN construct runbook mostly harness craft; strain appendix | | [notes/penciled-directions-2026-08-14](archive/planning-inputs/penciled-directions-2026-08-14.md) | settled | FE-1401 | Penciled directions from the legibility session: 8 items with firming actions + editorial reflections | | [capture-store-plain](reference/architecture/capture-store.md) | active | strain findings on FE-1401 | STE-leaning rendering of the capture-store semantics (FE-1390/FE-1389) with a load-bearing not-guaranteed section; 8-point strain report incl. two command-reachable unclosable-conflict paths (confirms FE-1419 commits 7/8) and the FE-1405 status-arity answer | | [notes/deep-read-fe-1389](evidence/proofs/audits/deep-read-fe-1389.md) | active | FE-1401 / findings in FE-1420 | Deep-read of the walking skeleton: builder's account, spec-discharge table (issues 10/13 capabilities discharged; markdown floor contradicted in the UI), 12 findings; source of PR #10's backfilled record | | [notes/deep-read-fe-1390](evidence/proofs/audits/deep-read-fe-1390.md) | active | FE-1401 / probes on FE-1419 | Deep-read of the capture store: spec-discharge table, write-time tiering assessment (penciled item 7), the FE-1405 status-arity answer, and live-probed confirmation of FE-1419's capture-store claims plus one new aliasing hole; source of PR #11's backfilled record | -| [plugin-contract-spec](specs/plugin-contract.md) | active | FE-1431 (spec issue); decided on FE-1405; amended by FE-1480; reshaped by ADR-0006 | Per-target-formalism plugin contract: fixed heading set, three machine-read tables (`Kinds`, `Must know`, `Patterns`) with `plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md` normative for row/column shape, version binding, `project`/`validate` as code with the ADR-0005 outputs, surviving invariants, open strains, and a Retired 2026-08-25 section pointing to the archived declarative draft | +| [plugin-contract-spec](specs/plugin-contract.md) | active | FE-1431 (spec issue); decided on FE-1405; amended by FE-1480; reshaped by ADR-0006; amended by ADR-0007 | Per-target-formalism plugin contract as data under harness-owned keys: identity block, contract keys (`ontology`, `schema` with a declared anchor, `patterns`), guidance and runbook cells that add to the repertoire default, `machinery`; `plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml` and `plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml` normative as co-authored siblings, `plugin.schema.json` normative for shape; version binding, `project`/`validate` as code with the ADR-0005 outputs, surviving invariants, gates, open strains, and what ADR-0006 and ADR-0007 retired. | | [elicitation-completion](specs/elicitation-completion.md) | active | FE-1402; rewritten under ADR-0006 | Nineteen invariants `evaluateCompletion(model, mustKnowRows)` must satisfy, framed as tests: derived boolean plus evidence report, floor as counts, question-relative demand over objective slices, universal active-objective check, status/precision/confidence separation, conservative conflict and divergence failure, stop/delivery/budget as non-inputs, read-time deferral licensing, no new persistence | | [elicitation-completion-rehearsal](evidence/proofs/design/elicitation-completion-rehearsal.md) | active | FE-1402; inputs FE-1403/FE-1404/FE-1431 | Test-bed material, not authority (reclassified 2026-08-25): manual clause-level replay over all 44 FE-1361 prefixes against the retired domain-keyed CPS DemandTable; golden-fixture candidate for `evaluateCompletion` once re-expressed at kind level | | [elicitation-completion-plain](evidence/proofs/design/elicitation-completion-plain.md) | active | FE-1402 legibility snapshot | Evidence, not authority (reclassified 2026-08-25): plain-language rendering of the pre-ADR-0006 completion draft and its translation strains; the invariants it explains survive in the rewritten spec | -| [cps-interview-guidance](archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md) | superseded | FE-1403; inputs FE-1404/FE-1406/FE-1431 | Archived 2026-08-25 under ADR-0006: the FE-1403 CPS card set (CPS-Q01–Q05, GEN-Q02, two hint fragments) whose cards became kind-indexed patterns P01–P05, P12 and `Moves` steps in `plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md`; banner records the card→pattern mapping and the `domain` mis-tag; retained as test-bed material | +| [cps-interview-guidance](archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md) | superseded | FE-1403; inputs FE-1404/FE-1406/FE-1431 | Archived 2026-08-25 under ADR-0006: the FE-1403 CPS card set (CPS-Q01–Q05, GEN-Q02, two hint fragments) whose cards became kind-indexed patterns P01–P05, P12 and `Moves` steps in `plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`; banner records the card→pattern mapping and the `domain` mis-tag; retained as test-bed material | | [cps-interview-guidance-desk-replay](evidence/proofs/design/cps-interview-guidance-desk-replay.md) | active | FE-1403; inputs FE-1404/FE-1406/FE-1431 | Evidence, not authority (reclassified 2026-08-25): manual two-transcript prefix replay of the archived CPS cards — per-card firings, expected evidence deltas, deactivation boundaries, candidate dispositions, research ledger; desk discrimination only | +| [plugin-keys-pressure-review-cycle-1](evidence/proofs/design/plugin-keys-pressure-review-cycle-1.md) | active | FE-1431; FE-1406; FE-1393 | Evidence, not authority: cycle-1 pressure review of the ADR-0007 key catalogue — 100-situation corpus against generality / specificity / flexibility, per-key verdicts, three proposed shape changes for cycle two, seven source contradictions the repertoire resolves silently; input to `packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md` | | [cps-interview-guidance-plain](evidence/proofs/design/cps-interview-guidance-plain.md) | active | FE-1403 legibility snapshot | Evidence, not authority (reclassified 2026-08-25): plain rendering of the archived CPS guidance with translation strains and their dispositions | -| [sdcpn-plugin](../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md) | active | FE-1404 (redefined toward the walking skeleton); supersedes the domain-keyed tables of FE-1402/1403 | The SDCPN plugin file: fixed contract headings (Purpose, Kinds, Must know, Patterns, Moves, Deliverable) over the IR spec's ten Layer-B kinds; three machine-read tables, domain-neutral by rule; `Moves` carries two job runbooks (`construct`, `review and revise`) with harness-owned checks and stopping outcomes; moves to `packages/plugin-sdcpn/` with the skeleton | +| [sdcpn-plugin](../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml) | active | FE-1404 (redefined toward the walking skeleton); supersedes the domain-keyed tables of FE-1402/1403 | The SDCPN plugin definition (`plugin.yaml`): the harness-owned keys of ADR-0007 — `ontology`, `schema` (declared `objective` anchor, floor, must-know rows over the IR spec's ten Layer-B kinds), `patterns`, guidance cells, runbooks for `construct` and `review-and-revise`, `machinery` — domain-neutral by rule; validated against `packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json`. Companion: [`plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml`](../packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml), the feature-anchored second formalism co-authored in the same cycle. | ## Control, architecture reference, and migration archive @@ -87,7 +89,7 @@ control loop is [`docs/agents/steering.md`](agents/steering.md). | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | [hash-monorepo-import-plan](archive/migrations/hash-monorepo-import-plan.md) | settled | FE-1437 | Native HASH assimilation plan: preserved history and child package workspaces under one Brunch context root, explicit authority cutover, exhaustive repository-material disposition, toolchain port, boundary gates, and verification | | [SPEC-LEDGER](control/SPEC-LEDGER.md) | active until milestone-one closure | FE-1383 | Obligation-level status and evidence ledger for the elicitation-kernel specification; settles when the milestone closes | -| [STEERING](control/STEERING.md) | active | FE-1357 / FE-1476 | One compact mutable authority for the current objective, proof frontier, soft edges, gates, beliefs, cuts, stop conditions, and exceptional roots | +| [STEERING](control/STEERING.md) | active | FE-1357 / FE-1476 | One compact mutable strategic control for the current objective, proof frontier, governing concerns, soft edges, gates, beliefs, cuts, stop conditions, and exceptional roots | | [STRATEGY-LOG](control/STRATEGY-LOG.md) | active append-only | governing IDs referenced by STEERING | Material strategic decisions and supersession history; distinct from accepted architecture ADRs and from status or diary history | | [flue-architecture-cheatsheet](reference/architecture/flue-architecture-cheatsheet.md) | active | commented on FE-1383; feeds docs/agents/flue-routing.md | Architect's consolidation of all 21 Flue guide pages: direct structured generation uses `harness.prompt`; model-delegated work uses `useSubagent`; three-lane boundary summary and ranked divergence risks; reconciled against installed Flue 2.0.3 source | | [topology](reference/architecture/topology.md) | active | ratified → ADR-0002; N1 discharged by FE-1422 + FE-1392; local N5 implemented by FE-1391; N3 amended by FE-1437 | Pseudo-style verification of the package/app tree against the three-lane model and spec §12.2: portable ask/sweep protocols, Flue binding wiring, package boundaries, and application-only Brunch–Petrinaut composition | diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md index aaaeb205b12..6c4c5287fbf 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ streak ≈ controller stopping policy; sealed segments ≈ session archive. The design convergence do not implement SDK surface, projection, …") displaced implementation into `evaluations/`, where it does not compound. -Meanwhile [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md) showed that the whole target +Meanwhile [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml) showed that the whole target fits one file: the twenty domain rows collapse onto kind-level rows instantiated on discovered nodes, and the five domain cards become kind-indexed patterns P01–P05. This record ratifies that file's shape as the plugin contract. @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ file's shape as the plugin contract. `Purpose · Kinds · Must know · Patterns · Moves · Deliverable`. The headings are the contract and are identical across plugins. The harness parses the `Kinds`, `Must know`, and `Patterns` tables into the model vocabulary, the demand list, and the pattern index; every other section - concatenates into the interviewer's instructions. `packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md` is the normative + concatenates into the interviewer's instructions. `packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml` is the normative exemplar; it moves unchanged to `packages/plugin-sdcpn/` with the walking skeleton. 3. **Demand rows are kind-level.** Each row is a slot on a kind with a required precision, an diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/arc-close.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/arc-close.md index cec8e534cbc..a6fe04a72ab 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/arc-close.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/arc-close.md @@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ that `STEERING` references it. No-op reconciliation persists nothing. ### 5. Reconcile steering and proof when triggered -If a steering trigger fired, run and reconcile [the steering protocol](steering.md), including its -completion criteria. Do not copy its loop here. +If a steering trigger fired, invoke `/ds-steer`. It consults the Brunch +[steering supplement](steering.md); do not copy its procedure here. If no trigger fired, continue the current proof frontier without a no-op steering update. @@ -85,5 +85,5 @@ Arc close is complete when: 3. touched issue references are current; 4. affected spec-ledger rows are current; 5. affected steering soft edges, roots, strategy, gates, and frontier are current; and -6. any triggered steering pass meets `steering.md`'s completion criteria; and +6. any triggered steering pass meets `/ds-steer`'s completion criterion; and 7. changed planning prose reads correctly after landing. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/documentation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/documentation.md index c93786f97e5..880ba8d3099 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/documentation.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/documentation.md @@ -70,13 +70,14 @@ accumulates run history. ## Mutable controls -`STEERING.md` is the one compact mutable strategic control: current objective, proof frontier, soft -edges, choices, gates, beliefs, exceptional roots, and stop conditions. `STRATEGY-LOG.md` is -immutable append-only rationale for material strategic choices; it is distinct from ADRs, which own -accepted architecture. `SPEC-LEDGER.md` remains a separate conditional obligation control. Link -evidence and history instead of copying chronology: Git is the mutable-control history. Do not add -diary or status entries to either strategic control. Linear owns issue state, hierarchy, assignment, -and hard blockers. +`STEERING.md` is the one compact mutable strategic control: current objective, selected proof +frontier, governing concerns, soft edges, cuts, gates, beliefs, exceptional roots, and stop or +replan conditions. Linear's mechanical frontier filters for available work; it does not select the +proof frontier. `STRATEGY-LOG.md` is immutable append-only rationale for material strategic choices; +it is distinct from ADRs, which own accepted architecture. `SPEC-LEDGER.md` remains a separate +conditional obligation control. Link evidence and history instead of copying chronology: Git is the +mutable-control history. Do not add diary or status entries to either strategic control. Linear +owns issue state, hierarchy, assignment, and hard blockers. ## Index and link rules diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/git-workflow.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/git-workflow.md index c1fb9390bdf..6545a355da4 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/git-workflow.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/git-workflow.md @@ -25,6 +25,13 @@ in-flight agents. If another agent may be active, use a separate worktree instea shared one; never stash, reset, clean, or otherwise claim work you did not create. Restore the branch you found after the stack operation unless the user asks to leave the worktree elsewhere. +A recorded **partition** gets one reusable worktree per effort; see +[`partition-worktrees.md`](partition-worktrees.md). Those directories outlive a single ticket. +The unit of branching is still the Linear issue: `gt create` inside the effort's worktree when +work on an issue starts. A holding branch is allowed only so a cut-now effort without an issue +yet can occupy a worktree; it is not submitted. Re-braid when the partition declares it, not at +a fixed ticket depth ([`partition-worktrees.md`](partition-worktrees.md)). + ## Naming - **Branch**: `{prefix}/{issue-id}-{keywords}` (e.g. `ln/fe-1362-demo-vehicle`). diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/issue-tracker.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/issue-tracker.md index 757005554e7..930523991b7 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/issue-tracker.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/issue-tracker.md @@ -18,9 +18,11 @@ for one named operation does not authorize adjacent mutations. - **Default team**: `FE`. **Project**: `brunch-agent`. Every approved new issue is created with `linear issue create --team FE --project brunch-agent --assignee self`, plus `--parent` when it - is not a root. Verify assignee, project, and parent after creation. Assignment denotes accountable - human ownership, never an agent claim. The project is the - ownership boundary for this codebase — see the registry rule below. + is not a root. The exception is a Wayfinder child: create it unassigned so `/ds-wayfind` can claim + it by assigning the driving developer before work. Verify assignee, project, and parent after + creation. Assignment denotes accountable human ownership; on a Wayfinder child it also serves as + the canonical claim. The project is the ownership boundary for this codebase — see the registry + rule below. - Related work also lives on teams `PRO` (product) and `H` (HASH) — read/reference those freely; create there only when asked. The legacy `brunch` project holds the old brunch product's history and is not this codebase's tracker. @@ -74,27 +76,39 @@ update. Publish it to the `brunch-agent` project. ## Wayfinding operations -Used by the `ds-wayfind` skill. The **map** is a Linear issue with one **child** sub-issue per -ticket. Linear owns issue facts: state, hierarchy, project membership, assignment, and hard -blockers. `STEERING` projects only current soft edges and chooses strategic work by objective -contribution, risk retired, and information gain. - -- **Map**: an FE issue in project `brunch-agent`, labeled `wayfinder → map` (label group `wayfinder`, - children `map` / `research` / `prototype` / `grilling` / `manual-task` — created 2026-08-11; - `manual-task` stands in for the skills' `task` type because the workspace already has an - unrelated "Task" label). The issue description holds the map body: Destination / Notes / - Decisions so far / Not yet specified / Out of scope. +Used by `/ds-wayfind`. The **map** is a Linear issue with one **child** sub-issue per ticket. +Linear owns issue facts: state, hierarchy, project membership, assignment, and hard blockers. +`docs/control/STEERING.md` is the strategic control and commissions every Brunch map. The +mechanical frontier filters for available work; `/ds-steer` selects the proof frontier. + +- **Activity kind**: the canonical skills require semantic kind `wayfind` on maps and tickets and + `dogsled:unframed` on child tickets. Those labels are not configured in this Linear workspace. + `/ds-wayfind` therefore routes to `/ds-setup` before creating a new map; loading an existing map + does not authorize metadata backfill. All Linear writes remain approval-gated. +- **Map**: an FE root issue in project `brunch-agent`, labeled `wayfinder → map` (label group + `wayfinder`, children `map` / `research` / `prototype` / `grilling` / `manual-task` — created + 2026-08-11; `manual-task` stands in for the skills' `task` type because the workspace already has + an unrelated "Task" label). The map body is Destination / Strategic context / Notes / Landing + evidence / Decisions so far / Not yet specified / Out of scope. Strategic context is required + and names `STEERING.md` as owner, the intended contribution, governing concerns with operative + meaning, and related maps. - **Child ticket**: a sub-issue of the map (native parent relation), same team and project, - carrying its `wayfinder → ` label. The description holds the question. -- **Blocking**: Linear's native **blocks / blocked-by** relations. A ticket is unblocked when - every issue blocking it is closed (Done or Canceled). -- **Mechanical frontier**: open, unblocked sub-issues of the map — lowest issue number first. This - is an availability filter, not the strategic proof frontier. Before work, inspect issue state and - any active branch or PR to avoid duplicate execution. -- **Resolve**: post the answer as a comment on the issue, set state **Done**, then append a - one-line gist + link to the map issue's _Decisions so far_ section (edit the map description). -- **Out of scope**: set state **Canceled** and record the gist + reason in the map's - _Out of scope_ section. + carrying its `wayfinder → ` label. Its compact decision contract holds Question / Context / + Resolution evidence / Out of scope. +- **Blocking**: Linear's native **blocks / blocked-by** relations. A ticket is unblocked when every + issue blocking it is closed (Done or Canceled). +- **Mechanical frontier**: open, unblocked, unclaimed sub-issues of the map — lowest issue number + first. This is an availability filter, not the strategic proof frontier. Before work, inspect + issue state and any active branch or PR to avoid duplicate execution. +- **Resolve**: post the answer as a comment on the issue, set state **Done**, then append a one-line + gist + link to the map issue's _Decisions so far_ section (edit the map description). +- **Out of scope**: set state **Canceled** and record the gist + reason in the map's _Out of scope_ + section. +- **Landing**: append the `/ds-wayfind` Landing section only after every child is Done or Canceled + and _Not yet specified_ is empty. An empty mechanical frontier is insufficient. The commissioned + map stays open and routes to `/ds-steer`, which reconciles `STEERING.md`, satisfies the root-issue + close contract, and closes the map. Landing or closure changes execution state only; neither + resolves a governing concern. - Pre-existing product issues (the PM's stubs) are **referenced** from map tickets via _related_ relations — never duplicated as wayfinder tickets and never closed by the map. A wayfinder ticket that validates a product issue links to it and records its verdict in the resolution diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/issue-writing.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/issue-writing.md index c93902b9509..ce79711f39a 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/issue-writing.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/issue-writing.md @@ -40,10 +40,11 @@ specification language for execution.** ## Who carries the contract -The test is authorship, not parentage. Every issue an agent authors from this repo on behalf of -the human driving the work carries the contract, including every sub-issue. A teammate-authored -issue outside this workflow keeps its author's structure; comment, relate, and record verdicts -without rewriting its title or body unless that author delegates the change. +The test is parentage. Every root issue carries the contract. A child issue inherits legibility +from its parent, keeps the shape its driving workflow requires, and carries `dogsled:unframed` so +team-facing views can filter it out. A teammate-authored issue outside this workflow keeps its +author's structure; comment, relate, and record verdicts without rewriting its title or body unless +that author delegates the change. Before changing an issue that carries the contract, fetch its current raw body and read the human-owned summary. @@ -87,13 +88,17 @@ available. ## Wayfinder maps -A map is an aggregating issue, so it carries both layers: a **plain-prose preamble** +A map is an aggregating root issue, so it carries both layers: a **plain-prose preamble** (the context layer, written so a non-engineer understands what the effort is, why, and where it -stands), then, inside `🏗️ Agent notes`, the wayfinder working sections (Destination / Notes / -Decisions so far / Not yet specified / Out of scope) as the execution record. The map's -list-shaped sections are earned — enumerating many children's state is the -information; `Not yet specified` is the map's one home for known-unknowns. When resolving a -ticket updates the map, refresh the preamble's status sentence in the same edit. +stands), then, inside `🏗️ Agent notes`, the Wayfinder working sections (Destination / Strategic +context / Notes / Landing evidence / Decisions so far / Not yet specified / Out of scope) as the +execution record. Every Brunch map is commissioned by `docs/control/STEERING.md`, so Strategic +context is required. Append Landing when the route is clear. The map's list-shaped sections are +earned — enumerating many children's state is the information; `Not yet specified` is the map's +one home for known-unknowns. When resolving a ticket updates the map, refresh the preamble's status +sentence in the same edit. At commissioned-map close, `/ds-steer` empties the mutable map sections, +posts an immutable resolution comment that points to both Landing and the reconciled strategic +owner, then closes the root. Each Linear write remains separately approval-gated. ## The execution record diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/legibility.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/legibility.md index 3f73b046c90..ccb8b82caf8 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/legibility.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/legibility.md @@ -10,6 +10,25 @@ The protocol serves one thesis, the same one the CI gates and the capture store with itself; re-rendered into a different register, every claim must survive translation, and the places where it doesn't are findings. +## What counts as legible + +Legibility is measured on the human, not the artifact (Lu, 2026-08-26). A proof is legible when +a person can watch it and decide something afterwards. The bar, in order of preference: + +1. **Observable interactions** — a web or terminal UI where the state changes and the data flow + are visible as they happen, in the style of a logic prototype: the person sees the capture + land, the completion report move, the question appear. +2. **Plain-language account** — what happened, what it shows, what it does not show, written for + a teammate who did not run it. +3. **Recordings** — a screen recording of 1 is evidence; a transcript file alone is not. + +Desk evidence, background or headless test runs, and machine-only-readable artefacts (JSON +stores, raw checkpoints, logs) are kept to a minimum and never stand alone as the proof of a +claim; they support a proof of kind 1–3. Naming this bar has not been enough to hold it — arcs +have drifted to desk proofs and hidden runs while calling them legible — so a move, stream, or arc +whose only evidence is of that kind is **not done**, and the steering supplement's proxy-completion +trigger fires. + ## The move: render and read the strain At the close of an arc, re-render its central artifact into another register and instruct the diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/partition-worktrees.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/partition-worktrees.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7f299c27b3e --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/partition-worktrees.md @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +# Partition worktrees + +When `docs/control/STEERING.md` records a **partition**, materialize one durable worktree per +**effort** that can run now. Moves (proof) and streams (strategy) do not map one-to-one onto +efforts (checkouts). Terms are in `CONTEXT.md`. This layout is Brunch-local, not Dogsled +vocabulary. Branch and PR rules stay in `git-workflow.md`. + +Do not create worktrees unprompted during `/ds-steer`. Cut them when the user asks, after the +partition table is current. Deferred work is not an effort; neither is someone else's branch +(name it on a join point instead). + +## Names and location + +Give each effort a **1–2 word** directory name (the effort, not the ticket). Record that name on +the partition. Live path and branch come from `git worktree list` and `gt ls` — do not copy them +into `STEERING.md`. The driver keeps the existing clone (`hash`). Path: a sibling of the HASH +clone, `~/Code/hashintel/hash-`. + +## Cut + +From the **driver** worktree, at its current HEAD. Do not switch the driver's branch. + +When the effort has a Linear issue, the holding branch *is* that issue's first branch: + +```text +git worktree add -b {prefix}/{issue-id}-{name} ~/Code/hashintel/hash- HEAD +``` + +When the partition says cut now and no issue exists yet, a holding branch is allowed so the +worktree can exist. It is not a PR. The first issue retargets it (`gt rename` or `gt create` +inside the worktree) when work starts: + +```text +git worktree add -b {prefix}/wN-{name} ~/Code/hashintel/hash- HEAD +``` + +`git worktree add -b` is the right tool here: `gt create` stacks on the current branch and would +make a linear stack. After the add, track each new branch as a Graphite **sibling** of the driver, +not as a child of the previously added effort: + +```text +gt track {branch} -p {driver-branch} --no-interactive +``` + +`gt ls` should fan out from the driver (`◉─┴─┴─┘`), not a chain. Until the pending stack merges, +the driver branch is the base; after it merges, rebase each effort onto `main`. + +## Re-braid + +Cutting siblings from a common HEAD is the start, not a license to stack further on each line. +**Re-braid** when the partition's re-braid table names it: restack onto the declared shared line, +resolve conflicts, then diverge again. Ticket count is not the measure — a fine-grained chain on +one effort can stay on that line; a coarse ticket that already moved a join point may need a +braid before the next. Do not stop work to wait for a braid that is not due. + +Three relationships stay distinct: the proof join (moves demonstrated together), the join point +(shared file, landing order), and the re-braid (git-line meeting). + +## Local services + +Several worktrees must not each spawn the Brunch server and the Petrinaut panel. The candidate +for a one-shot, idempotent bring-up is [Pitchfork](https://pitchfork.jdx.dev/) (`pitchfork.toml`, +`pitchfork start`; start only if not already running). HASH already uses mise, which is how +Pitchfork is installed. It is not adopted yet: G0.1 still needs a documented command; investigate +Pitchfork there rather than adding a compose entry for local daemons. Agents still do not leave a +foreground `yarn dev` running; `pitchfork start` is a one-shot to try, not a substitute for the +user's already-running services. + +## Reuse + +The directory lasts for the effort. Later tickets on the same effort `gt create` inside that +worktree. Braid first when the partition says to, not because another ticket is starting. Joined +moves may land from separate worktrees; none is done until the joint proof runs from one branch +that contains them all. + +Do not install dependencies until work is about to start in that checkout. Two worktrees cannot +hold the same branch. + +`git worktree add` carries no git-ignored file. Before an effort's first live run, copy the +driver's root `.env.local` (the provider credential) into the new checkout and confirm one model +call succeeds; a 401 from a fresh worktree is this, not the provider. On 2026-08-26 two efforts +lost a run to it. + +## Refresh + +If the partition adds an effort, cut it the same way from current driver HEAD. If it drops one, +leave the worktree until the user asks to remove it (`git worktree remove`). Revise the partition +and re-braid tables in the same driver edit; do not refresh copied paths or branch names. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/steering.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/steering.md index 0b9b0d2c8df..4bb75c33236 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/steering.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/steering.md @@ -1,10 +1,13 @@ -# Strategic steering: orient, choose, execute, reconcile, replan +# Brunch steering supplement -Use this protocol to keep Brunch aimed at a current, falsifiable proof rather than at whatever -issue happens to be available. The arc driver owns trigger evaluation. Current truth lives in -`STEERING`, which references governing `STRATEGY-LOG` IDs; this document owns only the control loop. +The `ds-steering` judgment and user-invoked `/ds-steer` procedure own orientation, strategic +reconciliation, proof-frontier choice, minimal control updates, and completion. This supplement +adds only Brunch-specific triggers, metadata, tie-breaking, and execution guidance. `AGENTS.md` +routes steering passes here through `/ds-steer`. -Run a steering pass when: +## Triggers + +The arc driver evaluates steering triggers. Invoke `/ds-steer` when: - work starts or resumes without a current proof target; - the objective, deadline, use case, or pressure changes; @@ -13,49 +16,55 @@ Run a steering pass when: - an external gate changes or becomes stale; - the selected frontier loses value; - a frontier's durable outputs are all desk, simulated, or evaluation-side, with no production-path - code changed by the end of one arc (proxy completion); or + code changed by the end of one arc (**proxy completion**); or - arc close detects strategic drift. Ordinary ticket movement is not a steering trigger. Proxy completion recurs under new names — a -tracer, a desk rehearsal, a preregistered instrument each stood in for the thing it was meant to -exercise and became the definition of done. An evaluation instrument larger than the thing it +tracer, a desk rehearsal, and a preregistered instrument each stood in for the thing it was meant +to exercise and became the definition of done. An evaluation instrument larger than the thing it evaluates is itself the finding. -## Orient - -Classify every load-bearing input as one of: +## Brunch control fields -- **fact**; -- **belief** with confidence and cited evidence; -- **unknown** with its cheapest probe; or -- **external gate** with owner, source, watch trigger, last-checked date, and consequences. +External gates in `docs/control/STEERING.md` carry **owner**, **source**, **watch trigger**, +**last-checked date**, and **consequence**. After the skills' posture-aware frontier ranking and +canonical tie-breakers, use **deadline pressure** as Brunch's final tie-breaker. -Do not turn confidence into fact. A confidence change cites the evidence that changed it. +Linear writes require explicit approval before creation or mutation. -## Choose +## Parallel partition (Brunch extension of `/ds-steer` step 5) -Treat the mechanical frontier (open, unblocked issues) as a filter, not a priority rule. Rank -eligible moves by objective contribution, risk retired, information gain, -deadline pressure, and cost/reversibility. +`ds-steer` selects one proof frontier and leaves other available work as "separate work". Brunch +adds a partition step after that choice: execution layout, not a second frontier. Moves (proof) +and streams (strategy) do not map one-to-one onto **efforts** (checkouts). The single frontier +stays; the partition says which checkouts run concurrently and how they rejoin. These terms are +Brunch-local and are not Dogsled vocabulary. -Select one proof frontier, or a deliberate pair whose join is named. Record: +An **effort** is a worktree with a write set disjoint from every other effort's except at named +**join points**. Record only efforts that can run now — not deferred work, not someone else's +branch. For each: write set, join points and who lands first, base, and a 1–2 word worktree name. +Live path and branch come from `git worktree list` and `gt ls`, not from this table. A separate +**re-braid** table names when diverging lines restack (when, who, onto what). Rules: -- **claim** — the proposition this frontier can validate; -- **proof bundle** — the fields below; -- **cut** — work explicitly excluded before the proof; -- **issue/gap projection** — existing issues and uncovered work needed to execute it; and -- **stop/replan trigger** — the observation that ends or redirects the attempt. +- Control documents (`STEERING`, the ledger, the strategy log, `INDEX`, `CONTEXT`) and Linear are + written only from the **driver** worktree. Efforts deposit through issue comments, commit and PR + bodies, and evidence under their own path; the driver reconciles at each landing through + `/ds-steer` (Reconcile). Every other file an effort would share with another effort is a join + point to name, and shared manifests (`package.json`, `yarn.lock`, Turbo and compose config) are + join points by default. +- Joined moves (one proof) may be built in separate worktrees; none is done until the joint proof + runs from one branch that contains them all. +- Cut effort branches from `main` once the pending stack has merged; until then cut from the + driver branch and rebase at merge. Use Graphite for the stacks. Materialize the table with + [`partition-worktrees.md`](partition-worktrees.md) when the user asks for the checkouts. Skip a + declared re-braid only when restacking now would cost more than restacking later; do not invent + a ticket-count gate. +- Record the partition in `STEERING.md` and revise it at every steering pass. An effort that has + no checkout of its own is a task inside one. Deferred work is not an effort. -An ordered frontier is an epistemic strategy, not a queue of tasks. Before dispatch, each step -names the evidence it consumes, the claim it can establish, and the later decision or proof it -informs; a terminal step records `none`. Do not dispatch a successor merely because the preceding -issue moved: first pass the independent review gate in [legibility](legibility.md), reconcile what -the result changed in current truth and confidence, and prepare the successor's dispatch brief from -that result. Deposit any durable change in its owning authority before launch; a dispatch brief is -not a substitute authority. Parallelize steps only after recording why neither step's scope or -interpretation depends on the other's findings and defining the claim and inputs at their join. +## Guidance for procedures that execute the frontier -## Execute +This section governs the procedure `/ds-steer` selects; `/ds-steer` does not execute the frontier. Exercise real production entrypoints and wiring. A fixture may supply domain inputs, but it must not supply product wiring absent from the product. Require both a runnable proof and an immutable @@ -89,38 +98,3 @@ inputs to the interviewee or elicitor under evaluation. At selection time, initialize the prospective fields. After independent review, finalize the result-dependent fields and deposit changed truth in the owning authorities before dispatching a successor. - -## Reconcile - -Deposit each changed truth into exactly one authority and link to it elsewhere: - -| Truth | Authority | -| --- | --- | -| Current objective, proof frontier, soft edges, cuts, beliefs, gates, and exceptional roots | `STEERING` | -| Material strategic decision rationale | append-only `STRATEGY-LOG` | -| Issue state, hierarchy, and hard blockers | Linear | -| Required behavior | `docs/specs/` | -| Accepted decisions | `docs/adr/` | -| Observed proof and witness snapshots | `docs/evidence/proofs/` | -| Evaluation runs and readouts | `docs/evidence/evaluations/` | -| Stable explanation and source material | `docs/reference/` | -| Superseded or settled historical context | `docs/archive/` | - -Linear writes require explicit approval before creation or mutation. Link; do not copy history or -evidence into mutable controls. Follow [documentation](documentation.md) for placement and -promotion, [legibility](legibility.md) for the second-register read, -[issue-tracker](issue-tracker.md) for tracker mechanics, and [arc-close](arc-close.md) for the -closing control pass. - -## Replan - -If a trigger fired, return to orient and choose. Otherwise continue the selected frontier; do not -replan merely because ticket state moved. - -Append IDs monotonically. A conflicting decision names the governing ID it supersedes; a -complementary decision uses `none`. Only unsuperseded governing IDs remain in `STEERING`. A no-op -writes nothing. - -The pass is complete when inputs are classified, one frontier (or named pair) has all choice -fields, its proof bundle is runnable and indexed, every changed truth has exactly one authority, -confidence changes cite evidence, and the next stop/replan trigger is explicit. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md index 795ab6bc449..7680869c56d 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > **Superseded 2026-08-25.** Moved from `docs/specs/cps-interview-guidance.md` under > [ADR-0006](../../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md): interview "cards" are no longer > separate artifacts; they became kind-indexed patterns in the `Patterns` and `Moves` sections of -> [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md`](../../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md). Mapping: CPS-Q01 → P01 · CPS-Q02 → P02 · +> [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml). Mapping: CPS-Q01 → P01 · CPS-Q02 → P02 · > CPS-Q03 → P03 · CPS-Q04 → P04 · CPS-Q05 → P05 · GEN-Q02 → Moves "construct" step 3 (the > batching sentence) · HINT-STATUS-GRADE → P12 · HINT-RESPECTFUL-CLOSE → Moves "construct" step 6. > The `domain` tag on the CPS cards was a mis-tag: each card names a model situation that occurs diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/specs/plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/specs/plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft.md index 9e219bb1f5a..f1b93d022fd 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/specs/plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/specs/plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft.md @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > `where` / `inSupport`, `ProposalType.affordance.firesWhen`, `NodeKind.completionAnchor`, the > typed `foldTable` / `demandTable` / `variantDimension` / `lossCategories` keys — has no current > authority; the current contract is the shrunk [`plugin-contract.md`](../../specs/plugin-contract.md) -> and the exemplar [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md`](../../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md). Content is otherwise +> and the exemplar [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml). Content is otherwise > verbatim; only relative link targets were re-rooted for the archive location. # Spec: the plugin contract — two schemas, two tables diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/control/SPEC-LEDGER.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/control/SPEC-LEDGER.md index 7603d2878f5..1efbec2b1e7 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/control/SPEC-LEDGER.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/control/SPEC-LEDGER.md @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ states. | Obligation | Spec | Status | Evidence | | -------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | ---------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -| Settlement trigger + judgment | §8.1 | **discharged** | FE-1392 computes the unswept true-user tail, guards pending asks and repeated frontiers, permits decline, and injects same-response settlement judgment through awaited `useAgentFinish` | -| Harness-resolved anchoring at sweep application | §8.2 | **discharged** | FE-1391 resolves exact quotes against archived user entries at command application; no match returns a repair hint, multiple matches choose latest with an advisory, and injected non-user matches refuse | +| Settlement trigger + judgment | §8.1 | **discharged** | FE-1392 computes the unswept true-user tail, guards pending asks and repeated frontiers, permits decline, and injects same-response settlement judgment through awaited `useAgentFinish`. Exercised live in baseline condition 5 (2026-08-25): 11 settlement-triggered sweeps over 12 turns. Open cost finding: the settlement sweep runs on the critical path before the ask is delivered ([latency assessment](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md) R1) | +| Harness-resolved anchoring at sweep application | §8.2 | **discharged** | FE-1391 resolves exact quotes against archived user entries at command application; no match returns a repair hint, multiple matches choose latest with an advisory, and injected non-user matches refuse. Live in condition 5: 3 of 11 batches refused `evidence-quote-not-found` and repaired in-turn, 8 applied. Refusal is per batch, not per proposal — a cost, not a correctness, gap ([latency assessment](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md) R3) | | Sweep idempotence, evidence-occurrence and content-keyed | §8.3 | **discharged** | FE-1392's durable executor may replay the settled prefix; the mounted oracle proves a repeated proposal skips while an earlier omission applies. FE-1464 proves a later identical entry cannot re-anchor a retry while distinct identical occurrences remain capturable. On refusal the successful high-water stays fixed while the loop guard reopens; the oracle stops once on the repair continuation and proves the range is offered again before succeeding | | Single-hop supersession over active heads; stale-session guard | §8.4, §9.2 | **discharged** | refusal carries `currentHeadIds` (FE-1390) | | Resolution records close conflicts; user-cited | §8.5 | **discharged** | FE-1419 (`ln/fe-1419-contract-closure`): conflicts open only over two-plus distinct active captures, referenced captures are pinned until a user-cited resolution frees them, resolutions compare by set equality, and every accepted command round-trips through the persisted parser. The one-reference and supersession-stranding holes are closed and red-proved. The tap-evidence adjudication (contradicted row below) remains open | @@ -84,12 +84,12 @@ states. | Obligation | Spec | Status | Evidence | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -| Durable target-document, transient sessions, sweep the only bridge | §9.1 | **partial** | store is session-independent (FE-1390); dev UI mints a fresh document per page load, so many-sessions-one-document is unreachable from any surface (deep-read FE-1389) | +| Durable target-document, transient sessions, sweep the only bridge | §9.1 | **discharged for the local panel** | FE-1504 mints one stable ui-shell principal in localStorage, sends it on every request, resolves it to one target-document id and principal-scoped session ids, and retains each session log in that document's archive. Reload reuses the principal and target document; a second conversation receives a distinct session over the same document. `brunch-principal.test.ts` and `elicitation-session.test.ts` pin the mapping; the live witness remains on FE-1503. | | Per-session state = evidence log, swept high-water mark, pending-affordance slot | §9.2 | **discharged** | pending slot (FE-1389), durable session-log archive (FE-1391), and FE-1392's parse-validated high-water/last-judged bookkeeping under one `sweepHighWater` state slot | | Re-entry briefing; user-visible insertion notice | §9.3 | **pending** | signal carrier proved; no briefing; the one injected signal is filtered out of the UI. Owned by FE-1396 | | Only the true user's side is evidence; injected entries structurally non-user | §9.4 | **partial** | FE-1391 verifies role/purpose against the public projection, refuses signal/advisory text, and classifies affordance replies only from the harness-owned reply-binding signal. The kickoff remains a machine-authored `user` entry until FE-1420/FE-1385 move it to `useInitialData`; FE-1396 still owns briefing-never-evidence | -| Completion derived, never a gate | §9.5 | **pending** | FE-1402's contract is now the invariants of `evaluateCompletion(model, mustKnowRows)` over the plugin file's `Must know` table in [`elicitation-completion.md`](../specs/elicitation-completion.md) (rewritten 2026-08-25 under ADR-0006; the domain-keyed DemandTable draft is archived). The FE-1361 prefix replay in [`elicitation-completion-rehearsal.md`](../evidence/proofs/design/elicitation-completion-rehearsal.md) is a golden-fixture candidate once re-expressed at kind level, not authority. No progress, stopping, durable delivery, and deferral licensing remain distinct from completion; nothing is built. | -| Storage port: harness-defined, binding-implemented, plugin-blind (C1) | §9.6 | **discharged for the local target** | core owns capture/archive/anchoring semantics; `binding-flue` owns the file implementation; plugins cannot import the binding (FE-1390 + FE-1391) | +| Completion derived, never a gate | §9.5 | **partial** | Built on FE-1497 (#9325): `evaluateCompletion` over the fold of the store onto the plugin's `must_know` rows, the sweep list, and the completion cue, all read-time, none gating a turn. Exercised live in baseline condition 5 (2026-08-25): the report was computed after each of 12 turns and never reached `complete` (46 unsatisfied, 0 unmapped) — the gap is identity in the fold (7 objective nodes for 2 questions, 167 possibly-equivalent advisories), not the derivation. Contract in [`elicitation-completion.md`](../specs/elicitation-completion.md); the FE-1361 prefix replay in [`elicitation-completion-rehearsal.md`](../evidence/proofs/design/elicitation-completion-rehearsal.md) stays a golden-fixture candidate. No progress and stopping remain distinct from completion; durable delivery and deferral licensing (rules 17–19) are deferred behind FE-1480 (see the STEERING gate). | +| Storage port: harness-defined, binding-implemented, plugin-blind (C1) | §9.6 | **discharged for the local target** | core owns capture/archive/anchoring semantics; `binding-flue` owns the JSON-file implementation and treats FE-1504's owner key as opaque; a mismatched owner is refused before read or write. Plugins cannot import the binding (FE-1390 + FE-1391 + FE-1504). | | Port scope includes the session-log archive | §9.6 | **discharged** | FE-1391 provisions a versioned target-document record containing capture state and session logs, migrates the legacy capture-only shape on mutation, parses both halves on read, identity-versions evolving messages, and retrieves every cited ordinal independently of Flue | | Compaction vs. durable log | §9.7 | **partial — source-settled, behavioral pin open** | Flue 2.0.3's append-only stream contract and implementation show compaction appends a canonical record, rewrites only model context, preserves the public message projection, and leaves `state_write` reduction untouched. The source-read record reshapes FE-1386 to one upgrade pin; `test/open-gaps.ts` remains until behavioral proof lands | @@ -104,11 +104,11 @@ states. | Obligation | Spec | Status | Evidence | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------- | -------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -| Plugin ownership: packs, forms, validators | §11.1 | **superseded → partial** | ADR-0006 (2026-08-25) makes a plugin one sectioned Markdown file per target formalism; ADR-0007 (same day) re-forms it as cells under harness-owned keys with the tables as schema-validated data (FE-1431) plus `project`/`validate` code ([`plugin-contract.md`](../specs/plugin-contract.md)); cards became kind-indexed `Patterns`, the completion contract became the `Must know` table. `plugin-gherkin` owns its one FE-1392 proposal declaration/schema and target identity; [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md) is authored but unparsed; the file parser, fold, and demand runner remain FE-1393 work | +| Plugin ownership: packs, forms, validators | §11.1 | **superseded → partial** | ADR-0006 (2026-08-25) makes a plugin one sectioned Markdown file per target formalism; ADR-0007 (same day) re-forms it as cells under harness-owned keys with the tables as schema-validated data (FE-1431) plus `project`/`validate` code ([`plugin-contract.md`](../specs/plugin-contract.md)); cards became kind-indexed `Patterns`, the completion contract became the `Must know` table. `plugin-gherkin` owns its one FE-1392 proposal declaration/schema and target identity; [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml) (`sdcpn/2026-08-25.2`) is parsed by `readPluginDefinition` against the core JSON schema, its rows drive the fold and `evaluateCompletion`, and its `slot-assertion` check is the sole machinery; the elicitor ran it live in baseline condition 5. Gherkin's zero-new-keys check remains FE-1393 work | | Pack form, Principle v2 | §11.2 | **superseded → designed** | ADR-0007 fixes pack form as the key contract (four groups; `plugin.yaml` + JSON schema in core; converging per decision 9); ADR-0006 had fixed it as the heading contract (`Purpose · Kinds · Must know · Patterns · Moves · Deliverable`) with three machine-read tables; Principle v2 still governs the prose sections. No parser or loader exists | | Smallest honest plugin as a standing bar | §11.3 | **partial** | `statement-noted.test.ts` and the core plugin fixture encode the one-type verbatim floor and reject undeclared parsed/pointer shape; the standing bar must grow with FE-1393's operations | | Generic strategy quiver | §11.5 | **designed** (ADR-0007) | designed 2026-08-25 as the **repertoire** (`packages/repertoire`, ADR-0007 decisions 3, 6–8); built under FE-1406 in the co-authoring cycle of S-009; the key catalogue converges before it freezes (decision 9) | -| Portfolio + hybrid order: both packs authored before the pack interface freezes | §13 | **superseded → partial** | ADR-0006 makes the interface the heading contract and three table grammars; the SDCPN plugin file is authored (`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md`), the Gherkin file is not. Owned by FE-1387 (FE-1383 slice, backlog); current sequencing puts the SDCPN proof before generic freeze (see `STEERING.md`). Gherkin wiring ahead stays legal while FE-1387 holds the freeze | +| Portfolio + hybrid order: both packs authored before the pack interface freezes | §13 | **superseded → partial** | ADR-0006 makes the interface the heading contract and three table grammars; the SDCPN plugin file is authored (`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`), the Gherkin file is not. Owned by FE-1387 (FE-1383 slice, backlog); current sequencing puts the SDCPN proof before generic freeze (see `STEERING.md`). Gherkin wiring ahead stays legal while FE-1387 holds the freeze | | Gherkin validation (parse validity, step lexicon) | §13.1 | **pending** | — | | Assurance target (Statement record, four edges, five-stratum derivation, ledger) | §13.2–13.3 | **pending** | — | diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/control/STEERING.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/control/STEERING.md index 4fa8df4dd9c..7389de91a54 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/control/STEERING.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/control/STEERING.md @@ -5,81 +5,323 @@ This is Brunch's one mutable current strategic control. Linear owns issue facts; ## Objective and acceptance proof -Prove a bounded CPS **review-and-revise** loop through the production Brunch and Petrinaut path: -a reviewer opens an existing source-grounded model and net, traces one element to the source -utterance, corrects it in three to five turns, and sees a provenance-preserving net delta handed to -the optimisation flow. This is the current proof, not a permanent product-scope decision. +Two jobs are in scope — **construct** and **review-and-revise** — and cold-start construction must +be possible ([S-011](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-011), amending S-001's framing). The proof order is fixed: +construct through the production path first, review-and-revise on top of it. Whether each job +needs its own comprehensive runbook is an assumption under test, not an accepted fact; early +passes over the plugin schema suggest the jobs share most of one. -Acceptance is one screen-recordable deployed run, surviving reload, through the real HTTP handler, +**Proof 0 — the black triangle.** From a checkout, documented commands bring up the Brunch server +and the Petrinaut assistant panel on local dev services; the panel's assistant is the production +SDCPN elicitor; a human conducts a real construct elicitation; captures persist to a target +document owned by a principal and survive reload; completion accounting is human-readable; every +turn records time per purpose. This is the precondition of the acceptance run, the September +demo's step 1 made real rather than fixtured, and the surface the voice-mode work attaches to. +Projection: [FE-1503](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1503). + +**Proof 2 — the acceptance run.** A bounded CPS review-and-revise loop through the production +Brunch and Petrinaut path: a reviewer opens an existing source-grounded model and net, traces one +element to the source utterance, corrects it in three to five turns, and sees a +provenance-preserving net delta handed to the optimisation flow. Acceptance is one +screen-recordable deployed run, surviving reload, through the real HTTP handler, session binding, sweep, fold, deterministic projection scaffold, model-assisted client-tool realization, compilation, and optimisation handoff. The changed element traces to a sweep-produced superseding capture while an unrelated region stays stable. Preserve runnable and legibility evidence under [proof evidence](../evidence/proofs/). -Governing strategic decisions: [S-001](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-001), [S-004](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-004), -[S-007](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-007), and [S-008](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-008). Governing architecture: -[ADR-0003](../adr/0003-three-register-ir.md), [ADR-0005](../adr/0005-model-assisted-sdcpn-realization.md), -[ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md), -[ADR-0007](../adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md) (accepted -2026-08-25; its key catalogue is a working set converging under decision 9). +## Governing concerns + +- [ADR-0003](../adr/0003-three-register-ir.md) — the elicited model is a pure fold between + assertions and projections; operative force: read paths make no new semantic judgments and every + model part traces to captures. +- [ADR-0005](../adr/0005-model-assisted-sdcpn-realization.md) — deterministic projection ends at a + scaffold and typed obligations; operative force: executable TypeScript is authored downstream + through Petrinaut and passes compile and simulation gates. +- [ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md) — each plugin serves one target formalism + and no domain; operative force: the production SDCPN slice, not a generic or domain-keyed + contract, sets the exercised interface. +- [ADR-0007](../adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md) — harness-owned + fixed keys join defaults to plugin cells; operative force: cycle two froze the catalogue, which + reopens only when run evidence forces a key change, while FE-1393 tests gherkin generality. +- ADR-0008 — repertoire defaults are core-owned prompt data behind a guarded + subpath; operative force: plugins never import + `@hashintel/brunch-agent/prompts`, the root remains the plugin SDK, and no broader core + reorganisation follows from this package correction. +- [S-001](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-001) — review-and-revise is the current proof, not permanent scope; + operative force: cold-start work does not gate the bounded correction run unless the use case + changes. +- [S-004](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-004) — code-bearing projections split into deterministic scaffolds and + model-assisted realization; operative force: executable claims require Petrinaut client tools, + compilation, and simulation. +- [S-007](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-007) — the production vertical slice, not another design instrument, + answers the remaining design questions; operative force: every arc must change or directly + exercise production-path code. +- [S-008](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-008) — harness teaching is package and schema topology rather than + free-floating prose; operative force: rescoping requires run evidence and keeps the declared + boundaries executable. +- [S-009](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-009) — the key catalogue converges by co-authoring both plugins; + operative force: schema, repertoire, SDCPN, and gherkin advance together until a cycle changes no + key. +- [S-010](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-010) — the shipped harness's facts replace the shadow classifier; + operative force: conditions 4 and 5 are the live arms and no text proxy decides what the harness + can report directly. +- **One production read model** — fold, completion, cue, and later correction share one derived + path; operative force: no correction-side parallel model. Source: [ADR-0003](../adr/0003-three-register-ir.md). + Steering projection: FE-1497 (controller read path). +- **Formalism-first contract pressure** — the first SDCPN implementation, not another generic + design, establishes the exercised seam; operative force: domain knowledge stays in the plugin. + Source: [ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md). Steering projection: + FE-1482 (SDCPN plugin skeleton). +- **Live-loop viability** — the production harness conducts an elicitation but does not yet + converge one within viable latency; operative force: measure per-purpose time and address + identity before strengthening the completion claim. Source: [condition-5 evidence](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/). + Steering projection: FE-1404 (condition-5 skeleton run). +- **Completion remains invariant-driven** — the production fold, not a domain-keyed instrument, + supplies the completion state; operative force: preserve the accepted invariant set as executable + tests. Source: [elicitation completion](../specs/elicitation-completion.md). Steering projection: + FE-1402 (completion contract). +- **Failure detection stays an oracle, not authority** — the catalogue tests production evidence; + operative force: apply it after the latency spike without letting evaluation material select the + strategy. Source: [failure catalogue](../reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md). + Steering projection: FE-1407 (failure catalogue). +- **Reply transactions survive retries and abandonment** — duplicate or stale replies must not + bind or apply; operative force: this safety floor precedes external client tools. Source: + [elicitation-kernel spec](../specs/elicitation-kernel.md). Steering projection: + FE-1420 (retry and abandonment safety). +- **Machine results remain correlated and non-user** — client-tool results retain field identity + without becoming evidence; operative force: executable realization stays gated on the round + trip. Source: [Petrinaut integration spec](../specs/petrinaut-integration.md). Steering projection: + FE-1438 (client-tool return). +- **Review sessions survive reload without crossing principals** — durability and privacy are one + boundary; operative force: the reviewer proof cannot claim continuity until both hold. Source: + [Petrinaut integration spec](../specs/petrinaut-integration.md). Steering projection: + FE-1439 (durable private sessions). +- **Artifact elements remain source-traceable** — generated structure points back to supporting + captures; operative force: provenance reads precede targeted correction. Source: + [ADR-0003](../adr/0003-three-register-ir.md). Steering projection: + FE-1478 (provenance read). +- **Realization stays field-local** — typed obligations become executable without unrelated + resynthesis; operative force: Petrinaut diagnostics and deterministic gates bound every repair. + Source: [ADR-0005](../adr/0005-model-assisted-sdcpn-realization.md). Steering projection: + FE-1480 (field-local realization). +- **Correction preserves unaffected structure** — targeted re-elicitation joins semantic and + reviewer work; operative force: supersede the changed capture while an unrelated region remains + stable. Source: [objective](#objective-and-acceptance-proof). Steering projection: + FE-1479 (targeted correction). +- **Plugin authoring is executable topology** — schema and key reader replace prose conventions; + operative force: the surface stays smaller than the parser it retires. Source: + [ADR-0007](../adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md). Steering projection: + FE-1431 (plugin authoring surface). +- **Harness teaching has one owner** — repertoire defaults fill every guidance and runbook key; + operative force: plugins specialize those keys without importing harness method. Source: + ADR-0008 and + [S-008](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-008). Steering projection: + FE-1406 (harness repertoire). +- **A second formalism tests generality after the tracer** — gherkin pressures the settled SDCPN + surface; operative force: it follows the production slice and adds no harness-owned key. Source: + [S-009](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-009). Steering projection: + FE-1393 (gherkin generality check). +- **The delivery surface must become visible early** — the watched use case and voice consumer + require a stable Petrinaut boundary; operative force: end-to-end visibility precedes layer-local + optimization, while use-case confirmation may reframe Proof 1. Source: [September Plan](https://www.notion.so/hashintel/Brunch-September-Plan-3b33c81fe02480a5af6bf3089c3ee640). + Steering projection: FE-1476 (September delivery). +- **The generality case needs recoverable provenance** — the truck-fleet source artifact is absent + from the repository; operative force: until it returns, the case carries no dossier-backed + provenance claim. Source: [S-007](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-007). Steering projection: FE-1382 + (truck-fleet dossier). +- **Legibility is measured on the human** — a proof is an observable interaction with visible + state change and data flow, a plain-language account, or a recording of one; operative force: + desk evidence, hidden runs, and machine-only artefacts never stand alone, and a move or stream + with only such evidence is not done. Source: [legibility protocol](../agents/legibility.md#what-counts-as-legible). + Steering projection: FE-1503 (the joint proof). +- **The plugin API is a design in flux** — two questions stay open: is the key schema a viable, + understandable way to specify a domain plugin, and does it come together as effective prompt- + and context-engineering material. Cycle two (2026-08-26) froze the catalogue under ADR-0007 + decision 9 — no key added, merged, or dropped; the third-formalism sketch fills cells only — but + three key *shapes* changed in that same cycle (`patterns[].slot`, `precision` any-of, repertoire + `for_precision`) and gherkin has been rendered and validated, never interviewed; operative force: + the freeze is the authoring interface's stability, not the generality proof — FE-1393's gherkin + interview is the remaining test, and any key change it forces reopens the catalogue via the + schema `CHANGELOG`. Source: + [ADR-0007](../adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md) decision 9, + [S-011](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-011), [cycle-two readout](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/readout.md). + Steering projection: FE-1393. +- **Tools are pinned as current truth against intent** — see [the inventory](#tool-inventory--current-truth-and-intent); + operative force: no tool is added, renamed, or promised in prose outside that table. Source: + [S-011](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-011), [Petrinaut integration spec](../specs/petrinaut-integration.md). + Steering projection: FE-1477 (routing), FE-1438 (client tools), FE-1480 (realization). +- **The voice edge attaches at `/api/chat`** — H-6763's prototype bridges finalized speech turns + into the existing AI SDK transport and consumes `brunch_ask`, keeping Brunch authoritative for + history, questions, captures, and provenance; operative force: the `/api/chat` UI-message stream, + the `brunch_ask` schema, and the principal identity are the stable surface and change only with + notice; provider code stays in `apps/petrinaut-website`. Source: + [ADR-0004](../adr/0004-in-petrinaut-staging-and-the-monorepo-import.md) decision 3, the H-6763 + prototype plan (branch `kostandin/h-6763-…`). Steering projection: H-6763 (Kostandin). + +## Selected frontier: G0 — the black triangle + +**Claim:** the shortest route to both proofs is the full end-to-end flow through every production +layer, made to work poorly before any layer is made to work well. Reaching it exposes the real +gaps, fixes the surface the team and the voice-mode work build against, and turns the harness's +facts into something a human can watch. + +**Contribution:** Proof 0; the September demo's step 1 as a real elicitation; the first +human-witnessed measurement of per-turn latency; the persistence model (principal → document → +sessions) exercised from a real surface for the first time. + +**Evidence consumed:** the condition-5 run and its [latency assessment](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md); +[ledger §9.1](SPEC-LEDGER.md#sessions--durability-9); the wiring gap assessment below; the H-6763 +prototype's attach point. + +**Cut:** no deployment, no client-side net tools, no realization, no Postgres, no gherkin, no +voice code in Brunch packages beyond the transport bridge, no claim about elicitation quality or +convergence. SQLite and per-document JSON remain the local implementation. + +**Projection:** [FE-1503](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1503), child of FE-1476; decomposed by +`/ds-write-tickets`. + +**Moves joined at Proof 0** — buildable in parallel worktrees, done only when the one human run +proves them together ([CONTEXT](../../CONTEXT.md#strategic-control) "Move"; [S-011](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-011) decision 3): + +| Move | Lands as | Owning issue | +| --- | --- | --- | +| **G0.1 Wiring** | Implemented on W1: `/api/chat` routes to the SDCPN elicitor and `yarn dev:brunch` starts Brunch with the real panel. The Proof 0 re-braid and human run remain. | FE-1504 (Done) | +| **G0.2 Persistence modelled** | Implemented on W1: the ui-shell principal resolves to one target document and principal-scoped sessions; the store refuses another owner. The live reload witness remains in Proof 0. | FE-1504 (Done), FE-1439 | +| **G0.3 Latency floor** | R0: `durationMs` per purpose and OpenTelemetry spans on every turn; a human-witnessed number replaces the inferred split | FE-1505, FE-1404 | +| **G0.4 Legible surface** | captures, sweep results, and completion readable during a live panel session; the attach contract stated in the Petrinaut integration spec with a changes-with-notice rule. Depends on G0.1–G0.2 landing; built on W1, stacked on FE-1504's branch (reassigned from the driver this pass: it consumes W1's code and write set, and the driver branch is the tip of the plugin PR) | FE-1506 | + +**Current move: the Proof 0 human run.** All four G0 moves are implemented — FE-1504 and FE-1506 +on W1 (FE-1506 Done, repository verification passed outside the sandbox), FE-1505's R0 timing on W2 +— and none is done as a move until one human elicitation from one branch proves them together. The +run outranks everything mechanically available because it is the objective's precondition and the +first evidence with a person as witness; W2's condition-5 figure and P1's gherkin proof run beside +it. Tracker residue: FE-1504 was Done and is now In progress with a closing comment in place — it +should return to Done (Linear mutation, approval pending). + +**Streams beside G0** — parallel, separately proven, blocking nothing: + +| Stream | Strategic warrant, claim, and proof | Projection / owner | Material coordination | Stop or replan | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| **P1 Plugin design loop** | ADR-0007 and S-009 require the key catalogue to be earned through both plugins and live runs. Cycle two ran both arms (condition 4: 24 turns to the hard stop; condition 5: 12 turns, 166 captures, 51 nodes, 0 unmapped, 93 unsatisfied) and froze the catalogue; FE-1431 is Done. Remaining proof: FE-1393 — a short gherkin interview yields a parse-valid `.feature` file and a per-key readout with zero new keys. | FE-1393 (FE-1406 reconciled by ADR-0008's completed move) / Lu | FE-1393 starts from a branch containing W4's guarded prompts move and deposits any repertoire finding in the schema `CHANGELOG`. No G0 coordination. | A run needs a new heading, domain content, or another prose-only rescope: reconcile ADR-0006/0007 before continuing. | +| **Voice edge** | H-6763 is an external September commitment: a provider-owned voice session must feed finalized turns into Brunch and resume a real `brunch_ask` without making provider history authoritative. | H-6763 / Kostandin | The `/api/chat` stream, `brunch_ask`, and principal are the join surface; FE-1506 records their changes-with-notice contract. | Provider needs leak into Brunch packages or require a Petrinaut-library-specific elicitor path: stop at ADR-0004. | + +**Stop or replan for G0:** a first question takes longer than the provisional 10 s after R0 and +R1 — the isolating spike becomes blocking; the panel needs Brunch-specific code inside +`@hashintel/petrinaut` — ADR-0004 boundary, stop; persistence modelling needs a schema the harness +must know — §9.6 port breach, stop; a move or stream lands with desk-only evidence — not done. -## Selected frontier: the vertical slice, worked outward from its epicentres +### Parallel partition (2026-08-26) -**Claim:** the shortest route to the acceptance proof is a working elicitation loop in the -production path with one formalism-level plugin, not further design. Every design question still -open is answered by what the slice forces, and answered in code. The design-convergence frontier is -closed: its outputs are test-bed material, and its one durable design result is the plugin file -[`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md) ratified by ADR-0006. +Execution layout, per the [steering supplement](../agents/steering.md#parallel-partition-brunch-extension-of-ds-steer-step-5) +and [`partition-worktrees.md`](../agents/partition-worktrees.md). The driver owns control +documents and Linear and carries no move. Kostandin's H-6763 is not an effort here; W1's join +points name it. The latency spike is deferred and is not an effort; G0's stop condition still +names it. An effort blocked on a gate stays an effort; only the driver drops a row, at a pass. -The slice has five epicentres, ordered by the size of the gap they close. Work starts at the -centre of each and moves outward; edges (SDK generality, affordance catalogues, UI breadth, -evaluation apparatus) are not worked until an epicentre needs them. +| Effort | Carries | Projection | Write set | Join points (who lands first) | Base | Worktree | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| **W1** | G0.1, G0.2, G0.4 (all implemented; FE-1506 Done; awaiting the Proof 0 run) | FE-1503's run, from the re-braided line | as before plus the panel or dev-diagnostics read of captures, sweep results, and completion; `docs/specs/petrinaut-integration.md` (attach contract) | with **Voice**: `petrinaut-chat.ts`, `local-dev-origins.ts`, `local-storage-demo-app.tsx`, the website `vite.config.ts`, three `package.json` — voice lands first or W1 rebases onto it; with W2: `apps/brunch-agent/package.json` (W2 already touched it) | driver branch until the stack merges | panel | +| **W2** | G0.3 (implemented; the live condition-5 purpose split is running) | FE-1505 | `binding-flue` turn observation, `harness-run.ts` `observe()`, OpenTelemetry setup in `apps/brunch-agent`; `condition-5.timings.jsonl` under evidence | with W1: `apps/brunch-agent/package.json`, `yarn.lock` | as W1 | timing | +| **W3** | P1 (cycle two landed, FE-1431 Done; next: the gherkin generality proof) | FE-1393 | `plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml` and its tests; a gherkin interview case and readout under evidence; the schema `CHANGELOG` | W4 is complete: restack onto a line containing `ln/w4-topology` before FE-1393 edits prompt data; with W1: none | W4 after the driver reconciles it | plugins | + +Live path and branch: `git worktree list`, `gt ls`. Driver checkout is this clone. + +Re-braid (restack and resolve, then diverge again). Length follows how fine the tickets are. + +| When | Who | Onto | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Done 2026-08-26 (Lu) — the braid before Proof 0 | timing, then plugins and topology | The five effort branches now form one line above the driver: 1504 → 1506 → 1505 → 1431-plugins → w4-topology. The `timing` checkout holds all four G0 moves and is where FE-1503's run happens; FE-1393 starts above `ln/w4-topology`, so it edits prompt data at its guarded core location | +| A join point is about to be written from a second effort | the efforts that share it | the line that already landed, else driver then `main` | +| Voice lands | panel | Voice (join: voice first) | +| The pending plugin stack merges | every cut effort | `main` | + +### Gap assessment (2026-08-26) + +| Triangle edge | Today | Gap | +| --- | --- | --- | +| **Panel → Brunch** | W1 routes the real panel's `/api/chat` to the SDCPN elicitor; `yarn dev:brunch` starts both services; `brunch_ask` round-trips. | Re-braid W1 with W2, then conduct the human Proof 0 run. | +| **Persistence modelled** | W1 sends one stable ui-shell principal on every request, resolves it to one target document and namespaced sessions, and stamps an opaque owner key that refuses cross-principal reads and writes. SQLite and per-document JSON remain. | Witness reload against the re-braided live surface; no persistence design gap remains for G0. | +| **Real elicitation** | The production SDCPN elicitor is reachable from the panel on W1; captures, sweep outcomes, and completion are rendered readably, and the attach contract is recorded. | Re-braid timing onto the W1 line, then conduct the eight-turn human run with a screen recording and a plain-language account under proof evidence. | +| **Deployment (G2)** | — | Was Linear-gated behind gherkin via FE-1423 ← FE-1396; that blocker was removed 2026-08-26. FE-1440/FE-1441 remain the owners. | + +### Tool inventory — current truth and intent + +| Side | Current truth | Intent (Lu, 2026-08-26) | Owner of the change | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| Server (`apps/brunch-agent`, harness-owned via `toolName`) | `brunch_ask` (suspend-for-reply affordance, rendered by the panel's interactive tool), `brunch_sweep` (private extraction into the store; plugin `checks` such as `slot-assertion` run inside it). Prefix from `PRODUCT_NAME = "brunch"`; one edit renames. | `ba_sweep`, `ba_check` (checks as a callable tool), `ba_ask` (possibly not needed yet — questions are plain text so far) | core `naming.ts`; FE-1477 for what the panel sees | +| Client (Petrinaut, `petrinaut-core`) | ~40 fine-grained `petrinautAiTools` (`addPlace` … `updateSubnet`, `applyAutoLayout`) executed in the panel's `onToolCall`; not reachable from the Brunch elicitor. | `pn_read`, `pn_mutate` (coarse tools over the action schemas), with a `pn_infer_slots` post-update that fills TypeScript from injected comments | FE-1438 (round trip), FE-1480 (realization, ADR-0005 obligations) | + +### After G0 — the sequence + +- **G1 — the usable triangle.** R1 (sweep off the critical path) first; identity and dedup in the + fold so completion can move; resume. The earlier plan's A and B, worked inside the triangle. +- **G2 — the demo triangle.** Client-tool round trip (FE-1438 → FE-1480 → FE-1479), deployment + behind demo.petrinaut.org (FE-1440, FE-1441), then Proof 2. + +### Epicentres and lanes (context the moves and streams inherit) + +The vertical slice of [S-007](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-007) remains the map of the code: five epicentres, +ordered by the size of the gap they close, worked from the centre outward. The triangle +subordinates them — each is reached as the end-to-end flow needs it. | Epicentre | Gap | Issue | | --- | --- | --- | -| **E1 — controller read path** | The harness writes captures and never reads them back: no fold to a model, no completion over objective slices, no sweep list, no cue to the next turn. The hollow centre between "captured facts" and "conducted an elicitation". | FE-1497 (gist: harness controller read path) | -| **E2 — the SDCPN plugin in code** | The plugin file exists as a spec; nothing parses its three tables, folds captures onto its kinds, or projects from them. | FE-1482 (gist: CPS plugin, redefined as the skeleton epicentre) | +| **E1 — controller read path** | *Landed on the unmerged stack (FE-1497, #9325):* fold, `evaluateCompletion`, sweep list, and cue exist and ran live in condition 5. Remaining gap: node identity in the fold (7 objective nodes for 2 questions) — worked in G1. | FE-1497 (gist: harness controller read path) | +| **E2 — the SDCPN plugin in code** | *Landed on the unmerged stack:* `plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml` (`sdcpn/2026-08-25.2`) is parsed by `readPluginDefinition` against the core schema and drives the fold and completion. Remaining gap: the `project` and `validate` code and the key catalogue's convergence (P1). | FE-1482 (gist: CPS plugin, redefined as the skeleton epicentre) | | **E3 — targeted correction** | `supersedes` is unreachable from extraction; no affected-slice computation; no delta; the target-document is still identified with the conversation. | FE-1479 (targeted re-elicitation), FE-1478 (provenance read), FE-1439 (durable session / document boundary) | | **E4 — the real entry** | Client-tool results do not return to the elicitor; retry/abandonment semantics unproven; realization gated. | FE-1438, FE-1420, FE-1480 | -| **E5 — the teaching layer** | The harness teaches eight sentences; the plugin runbook carries five-sixths harness method that gherkin would repeat; the parser reads the floor and anchor from prose by convention. Opened by E1's landing ([S-008](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-008)); designed by [ADR-0007](../adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md); converged by co-authoring both plugins ([S-009](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-009)). | FE-1431 (authoring surface: schema, `plugin.yaml`, key reader), FE-1406 (`packages/repertoire`), FE-1393 (zero new keys) | +| **E5 — the teaching layer** | The harness teaches eight sentences; the plugin runbook carries five-sixths harness method that gherkin would repeat; the parser reads the floor and anchor from prose by convention. Opened by E1's landing ([S-008](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-008)); designed by [ADR-0007](../adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md); converged by co-authoring both plugins ([S-009](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-009)). | FE-1431 (authoring surface — Done, catalogue frozen at cycle two), FE-1406 (repertoire — built and moved into core by ADR-0008), FE-1393 (zero new keys — the open proof) | ```text skeleton (construct job; proves the loop, produces fixtures) FE-1497 controller read path -> FE-1482 plugin file + parser + fold -> FE-1404 skeleton run against the baseline simulated expert + (condition 5 currently proves that the loop closes but does not reach completion) reviewer lane (review-and-revise job; the acceptance proof) FE-1420 retry/abandonment safety -> FE-1438 client-tool return -> FE-1439 durable session FE-1478 provenance read -> FE-1480 scaffold/realization -> FE-1479 targeted correction join authoring lane (E5; a convergence cycle alongside the skeleton run, joining it at a run over the migrated plugin) -each cycle: write schema + plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml + plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml + repertoire together +each cycle: write the core schema + core repertoire + both plugin.yaml files together -> review: does every key plausibly serve both? press against the CPS edge material - -> run where a run exists -> edit; the catalogue freezes when a cycle changes no key -FE-1431 (schema, plugin.yaml, key reader) | FE-1406 (packages/repertoire) | FE-1393 (gherkin, zero keys) advance together + -> run: re-do the simulated interviews over the wired agent — baseline conditions 4 (the rendered + layer as prompt only) and 5 (the shipped harness in the loop); 1–2 are frozen, 3 retired (S-010) + -> the strains and failures found are the next cycle's input to the ontologies and definitions + -> edit; the catalogue freezes when a cycle changes no key +FE-1431 (schema, plugin.yaml, key reader) | FE-1406 (core ./prompts repertoire) | FE-1393 (gherkin, zero keys) advance together ``` Arrows are strategic order. The skeleton lane and the reviewer lane run in parallel; they join at FE-1479, whose "affected slice", "re-evaluate", and "delta" moves consume E1's fold and completion. -No hard blocker chain remains from the retired design queue. The authoring lane's sizing -(FE-1406 as a package, FE-1431 as the authoring surface) is [S-008](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-008)'s; its -method — both plugins written together, the catalogue converging — is [S-009](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-009)'s. -Linear reflects both as of 2026-08-25. +The authoring lane's sizing is [S-008](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-008)'s; its co-authoring method is +[S-009](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-009)'s. -### Proof bundle for the selected frontier +### Proof bundle +- **Proof 0 — the black triangle (FE-1503).** Prospective fields: claim and scenario as in the + objective; production entrypoints `apps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts` over `/api/chat` and + the real Petrinaut panel; fixture: none — a human is the expert; runnable procedure: the + documented dev commands; run snapshot: per-turn timing and the store under proof evidence; + legibility snapshot: a screen recording plus a plain-language account; witness: the human who + ran it (required — this is a live-runtime claim). Result-dependent fields open. - **Proof 1 — the loop works (skeleton run, FE-1404).** A harness with **no domain knowledge**, loaded with the SDCPN plugin file, interviews the existing simulated coatings-plant expert through the production capture, fold, completion, and cue path. Scored against conditions 1 and 2 on the inherited dimensions, with the FE-1407 failure catalogue as the oracle list. Then the truck-fleet case (Layer B's validation case; fixture from the inbox SDCPN nets if the dossier stays missing) through the **unchanged** plugin file: zero new headings, zero new rows. + Existing [condition-5 evidence](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/) + narrows the claim: **the harness conducts an elicitation; it does not yet converge one.** Identity + and latency remain open. The next run adds per-purpose timing before the C1/C2 and FE-1407 + read-out; the truck-fleet half remains unrun. - **Proof 2 — the acceptance run** as stated in the objective, on the reviewer lane. - **Inputs:** the plugin file; the baseline situation pack, transcripts, and readout (coatings plant, not truck fleet); the FE-1407 catalogue; the FE-1402 invariants as tests on `evaluateCompletion`; the 44-prefix rehearsal as a golden-fixture candidate once re-expressed at kind level. No new evaluation instrument is built for September: the simulated expert and the - C1/C2 scoring are the fixed instrument. + C1/C2 scoring are the fixed instrument, and for condition 5 the harness's own facts (captures, + sweep results, completion report) replace any text classifier ([S-010](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-010)). - **Durable outputs:** production-path code in `packages/core` and `packages/plugin-sdcpn`; the skeleton transcript and readout under evaluation evidence; amendments to the plugin file only where the run forces them. @@ -105,26 +347,47 @@ Linear reflects both as of 2026-08-25. The read-only Linear graph supplies mechanical availability, never priority. +## Immediate concern — per-turn latency + +The production run is not viable at its observed ~145 seconds per interviewer turn. The +[latency assessment](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md) +owns the diagnosis and intervention sequence. Operative force here: every next harness run records +`durationMs` per turn purpose (R0 lands inside G0), R1 opens G1, and the isolating spike runs when +a human at the panel cannot get a question within target; the C1/C2 and FE-1407 read-out follows +the spike. The first per-purpose figure comes from the Proof 0 panel run, not from another +simulated condition-5 run: W2's R0 instrumentation is committed and FE-1505 accepts a panel run. +The simulated baseline is a cross-check, and it runs only once a short-run knob makes it cheap. Provisional targets (adopted 2026-08-26) are 10 seconds to a visible question, 60 +seconds to a settled sweep, and fewer than 5,000 output tokens per steady-state turn. The triangle +changes the witness: latency is no longer a number in a transcript but a person waiting. + ## Active gates | Gate | Owner / source | Watch trigger | Last checked | Consequence | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -| FE-1480 executable realization unavailable | FE-1438; [ADR-0005](../adr/0005-model-assisted-sdcpn-realization.md) | Client tools return code diagnostics to the elicitor. | 2026-08-25 | Scaffold work may proceed; no runnable FE-1480 proof until the gate opens. | -| Final use case outstanding | Dora; FE-1476 / September Plan | Dora confirms or changes it. | 2026-08-25 | If creation is required, Proof 1 becomes acceptance-relevant rather than a harness proof; reconcile ADR-0004/proof. | -| Deferral licensing (completion spec rules 17–19) unbuildable | [elicitation-completion](../specs/elicitation-completion.md) rules 17–19; FE-1480 / [ADR-0005](../adr/0005-model-assisted-sdcpn-realization.md) | A durable projection delivery exists for an evaluated revision. | 2026-08-25 | E1 supplies the report and revision (FE-1497, #9325); rule 18 makes licensing `false` without a delivered projection, so no issue is opened. When FE-1480 delivers, it is one read-time function beside `evaluateCompletion` plus a binding hook at settlement; no new persistence. | -| Truck-fleet dossier missing from the repository | FE-1382 is Done but its promised `docs/reference/research/` artifact is absent. | Artifact path/branch is supplied or a reviewed replacement is selected. | 2026-08-25 | The generality half of Proof 1 uses a fixture derived from the inbox truck SDCPN and Layer B's worked example; claim no dossier-backed domain provenance. | +| G0's baseline lives on a partly merged stack | Lu; #9320 and #9321 merged 2026-08-26; #9322, #9325, #9327 (approved) and #9337 (draft) remain, carrying `ln/fe-1431-plugin-authoring-cycle` | The rest of the stack merges to `main`. | 2026-08-26 | #9337 (draft) is the bottleneck: the whole effort line (1504 → 1506 → 1505 → 1431-plugins → w4-topology) sits above it, and only #9345 (1504, draft) has a PR so far. Nothing reaches `main` until it merges. Cycle two and ADR-0008 have superseded its draft scope; take it out of draft and merge the four remaining PRs, then the line restacks onto `main`. `ln/w4-topology` needs an issue before it is submitted (a branch carries at least one). | +| FE-1480 executable realization unavailable | FE-1438; [ADR-0005](../adr/0005-model-assisted-sdcpn-realization.md) | Client tools return code diagnostics to the elicitor. | 2026-08-26 | Scaffold work may proceed; no runnable FE-1480 proof until the gate opens. | +| Final use case outstanding | Dora; FE-1476 / September Plan | Dora confirms or changes it. | 2026-08-26 | If creation is required, Proof 1 becomes acceptance-relevant rather than a harness proof; reconcile ADR-0004/proof. | +| Deferral licensing (completion spec rules 17–19) unbuildable | [elicitation-completion](../specs/elicitation-completion.md) rules 17–19; FE-1480 / [ADR-0005](../adr/0005-model-assisted-sdcpn-realization.md) | A durable projection delivery exists for an evaluated revision. | 2026-08-26 | E1 supplies the report and revision; rule 18 makes licensing `false` without a delivered projection, so no issue is opened. When FE-1480 delivers, it is one read-time function beside `evaluateCompletion` plus a binding hook at settlement; no new persistence. | +| Truck-fleet dossier missing from the repository | FE-1382 (truck-fleet dossier) promised a `docs/reference/research/` artifact that is absent. | Artifact path/branch is supplied or a reviewed replacement is selected. | 2026-08-26 | The generality half of Proof 1 uses a fixture derived from the inbox truck SDCPN and Layer B's worked example; claim no dossier-backed domain provenance. | +| Voice-edge provider undecided | Kostandin; H-6763 prototype plan (branch `kostandin/h-6763-…`); OpenAI Realtime is the current first choice, ElevenLabs the architectural lean. | Comparison recordings and a recorded team decision. | 2026-08-26 | The attach surface (`/api/chat` stream, `brunch_ask`, principal) is frozen regardless of provider; provider-specific needs arrive as generic host extensions on the website side, never as Brunch code. | ## Decision-relevant beliefs and unknowns | Belief or unknown | Confidence / evidence | Cheapest probe | | --- | --- | --- | -| Kind-level rows express the coatings case. | Medium-high; the twenty domain-keyed rows of the FE-1402 rehearsal collapse onto eight kind rows on paper. | Proof 1's first half. | +| Construct and review-and-revise share most of one runbook. | Medium-low; Lu's reading of the early plugin-schema passes; unrehearsed. | Author both job runbooks against the key schema and diff them; a cycle of the plugin loop. | +| Kind-level rows express the coatings case. | High; cycle-two [condition-5 evidence](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/) folds 166 captures into 51 nodes with 0 unmapped, and the 93 unsatisfied rows are declared demands, not missing vocabulary. Sufficiency for completion is still unshown. | A run with identity handling; count objective nodes. | +| Typed extraction on the verbatim floor holds up in a live run. | Medium-high; the [latency assessment](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md) records repaired refusals and leaves cost, not correctness, as the open question. | R0 + the assessment's §6 spike: does a cheaper extraction model keep kind/node/slot agreement? | +| The shipped loop converges to completion. | Low; both condition-5 runs (cycle one, [cycle two](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/)) end with node identity the dominant defect and no terminal act for an expert-stopped engagement; the cycle-two readout routes both to FE-1383 as harness work, not catalogue gaps. | Give the sweep the node index (R4); rerun condition 5; count objective nodes. | +| Per-turn latency is dominated by extraction, and removable from the critical path. | Medium; the [latency assessment](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md) infers the split from output volume because per-call timing is absent. | R0, then the assessment's §6 spike on frozen turn tails. | +| The condition-5 instrument is too expensive to iterate on. | High; a full run is 12–24 turns at ~145 s each (30–60 min), `harness-run.ts` writes every artefact only at the end, `HARD_STOP_AT = 24` is hard-coded with no short-run knob, and W2's afternoon (2026-08-26, ~3 h after the credential fix) produced attribution fixes and no completed figure. The instrument's cost is now a bound on the P1 cycle and on every harness fix. | A `BRUNCH_BASELINE_HARD_STOP` env (a 3-turn run yields the purpose split in under 10 min); the §6 frozen-tail replay; and taking the first split from the Proof 0 panel run, which FE-1505 already accepts ("harness **or** panel run"). | +| The baseline and the panel measure the same interviewer. | Low; `harness-run.ts` defaults `BRUNCH_SDCPN_MODEL` to `claude-opus-5`, `sdcpn-elicitor.ts` defaults it to `claude-haiku-4-5`. The 145 s figure is opus in the baseline; the panel's production default is unmeasured and undecided. | Lu names the Proof 0 interviewer model before the run; the run records it in the proof bundle. | | The truck-fleet case adds zero headings and zero rows. | Medium; Layer B was validated against it, but never through this file. | Proof 1's second half. | -| The controller read path is small. | The tripwire fired: E1 landed on FE-1497 (#9325) at 1055 code lines (excluding comments) against the plugin file's 225 non-blank lines — 378 parse the file and narrow the proposal schema, 677 are the fold, completion, and cue. Rules 17–19 are deferred (see gates). The parser question is answered: ADR-0007 decision 8 makes the contract schema-validated data (E5). | Watch whether FE-1479's affected-slice and delta moves fit inside the 677-line engine, and whether FE-1431's key reader lands well under 378 lines. | -| Harness teaching that has a package survives rescoping. | Low; the [lineage audit](../evidence/proofs/audits/harness-teaching-lineage-audit.md) shows four prose-only rescopings since 2026-08-11, none citing run evidence, and no test of the converse yet. | The first arc after `packages/repertoire` lands: does any rescoping of it cite a run? | +| The controller read path is small. | Low; the current implementation exceeds the plugin file in size. The parser question is answered by ADR-0007 decision 8; completion rules 17–19 remain behind the delivery gate. | Watch whether FE-1479's affected-slice and delta moves fit inside the existing engine, and whether FE-1431's key reader stays smaller than the parser it replaces. | +| Executable ownership survives a topology correction without rescoping the teaching. | Medium; W4 moved the repertoire byte-identically into core and strengthened the import guard, but no later content edit has tested the run-evidence discipline. | On the first post-W4 teaching edit, require run evidence and confirm the architecture gate still prevents plugin imports. | | Field-local code obligations support localized realization and repair. | Low-medium; the corpus and Petrinaut diagnostics are field-addressed, but no Brunch run exists. | Realize one stochastic transition without rewriting an unrelated field. | | Five turns yield a scoped correction. | Low; unrehearsed. The review-and-revise runbook in the plugin file is the first concrete trajectory. | Run two bounded rehearsals against a fixture model. | -| Ask carries durable client-tool results. | Medium-low; machine results refused today. | Run one correlated FE-1438 round trip. | +| Ask carries durable client-tool results. | Medium-low; the current protocol refuses machine results. | Run one correlated FE-1438 round trip. | | Structured export explains provenance/delta. | Medium; FE-1481 permits it. | Witness one rehearsal. | ## Sequencing cuts @@ -141,18 +404,25 @@ The read-only Linear graph supplies mechanical availability, never priority. plugin freeze) before September. - Defer broad UI/ontology/gallery/affordances/voice/scenarios/telemetry until the loop closes. - Fixtures supply domain state, never product wiring; provenance and the real entrypoint are gates. -- The teaching layer is built as topology — a package, fixed keys, a schema, gates — with each layer - paired with the document that states its intent, never as spec prose alone; and it is not - rescoped without run evidence ([S-008](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-008), [ADR-0007](../adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md)). +- The teaching layer is built as executable topology — core-owned prompt data behind a guarded + subpath, fixed keys, a schema, and gates — never as spec prose alone; its content is not rescoped + without run evidence ([S-008](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-008), + [ADR-0007](../adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md), + ADR-0008). - The key catalogue is a working set until a cycle changes no key: fix it by writing both plugins against it, not by decree ([S-009](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-009), ADR-0007 decision 9). +- The triangle first, poorly; no layer is optimised for its own sake before the end-to-end flow + exists ([S-011](STRATEGY-LOG.md#s-011)). Providers own audio; Brunch owns history, questions, + captures, and provenance; provider conversation history is never authoritative. ## Stop or replan - Dora requires cold-start creation. - **Proxy completion:** an arc ends with durable outputs that are all desk, simulated, or - evaluation-side and no production-path code changed (recurred twice: tracer-as-done, - instrument-as-done). + evaluation-side and no production-path code changed. The next arc must move production code or + the trigger fires. +- The next run over the harness reports tokens but not time per turn purpose (the latency concern + stays a hypothesis), or a latency target is still unset when a move or stream is selected. - Proof 1 shows a `Must know` that kind-level rows cannot express, or the truck-fleet case needs a new heading (ADR-0006's revisit condition). - E1 exceeds the plugin file in size, or needs a persistence surface. @@ -160,8 +430,14 @@ The read-only Linear graph supplies mechanical availability, never priority. - Two rehearsals fail the five-turn correction. - FE-1438 loses correlation, durability, or evidence semantics. - Production remains undeployable after FE-1479; seek a demo-surface decision, not test wiring. -- The teaching layer is rescoped again without run evidence, or `packages/repertoire` grows larger - than the plugin it teaches. +- The teaching layer's content is rescoped again without run evidence, or guarded prompt defaults + become importable by plugins or from core's root. +- A first question at the panel takes longer than 10 s after R0 and R1 (the spike becomes + blocking); the panel needs Brunch-specific code inside `@hashintel/petrinaut`; or persistence + modelling needs a schema the harness must know. +- A G0 move, a stream, or any arc closes with only desk, hidden-run, or machine-only evidence + ([legibility](../agents/legibility.md#what-counts-as-legible)). +- A package is split or moved without an ADR. ## Exceptional roots @@ -172,4 +448,4 @@ The read-only Linear graph supplies mechanical availability, never priority. - **FE-1472** — unrelated SDK-pin triage; assign an owning map or remove from the project. - **FE-1476** — September delivery root; intended parent is FE-1357. - **FE-1477–FE-1481** — PM-authored outcome roots; intended parent is FE-1476 after overlap review - and separately approved Linear mutation. FE-1482 was parented to FE-1476 on 2026-08-25. + and separately approved Linear mutation. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/control/STRATEGY-LOG.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/control/STRATEGY-LOG.md index 549bb6e14d4..bf0f25ac891 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/control/STRATEGY-LOG.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/control/STRATEGY-LOG.md @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ shared prerequisite. **Supersedes:** none -**Evidence links:** [STEERING execution tree](STEERING.md#execution-tree), FE-1479 +**Evidence links:** [STEERING](STEERING.md) (the execution tree of that date; the section was +folded into "Epicentres and lanes" on 2026-08-26), FE-1479 ### S-004 @@ -126,7 +127,8 @@ contract from later three-target ratification. **Supersedes:** S-002 -**Evidence links:** [STEERING selected frontier](STEERING.md#selected-frontier-design-convergence), +**Evidence links:** [STEERING](STEERING.md) (the design-convergence frontier of that date, closed by +S-007; no current section), [plugin contract](../specs/plugin-contract.md), FE-1407, FE-1402, FE-1403, FE-1404, FE-1406, FE-1431 @@ -153,7 +155,8 @@ decision that the FE-1431 handoff failed to settle. **Supersedes:** none -**Evidence links:** [STEERING selected frontier](STEERING.md#selected-frontier-design-convergence), +**Evidence links:** [STEERING](STEERING.md) (the design-convergence frontier of that date, closed by +S-007; no current section), FE-1407, FE-1404, FE-1406, FE-1431 ### S-007 @@ -179,7 +182,7 @@ instrument as definition of done". **Decision:** Invert S-005 and S-006: implement the vertical slice and design only what the slice forces. Adopt [ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md): plugins are per target -formalism, authored as one sectioned Markdown file; `packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md` is the exemplar. +formalism, authored as one sectioned Markdown file; `packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml` is the exemplar. Close the design-convergence queue: FE-1407, FE-1402, and FE-1403 are reclassified as test-bed material; FE-1404 is redefined as the skeleton run — condition 3 as the protocol originally defined it (kernel harness + real plugin), not the shadow-harness instrument; FE-1406 shrinks to @@ -211,7 +214,7 @@ heading the contract does not have (ADR-0006's condition). **Supersedes:** S-005, S-006 **Evidence links:** [ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md), -[sdcpn plugin file](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md), +[sdcpn plugin file](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml), [IR spec Layer B](../specs/intermediate-representation.md#layer-b--the-cps-plugins-ir), [archived drafts](../archive/specs/), [baseline situation pack](../../evaluations/cases/process-model-elicitation/baseline/situation-pack.md), @@ -269,7 +272,7 @@ than the plugin it teaches (the instrument-larger-than-the-thing heuristic, appl **Evidence links:** [ADR-0007](../adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md), [lineage audit](../evidence/proofs/audits/harness-teaching-lineage-audit.md), [penciled directions 2026-08-14](../archive/planning-inputs/penciled-directions-2026-08-14.md), -[SDCPN plugin file](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md), FE-1406, FE-1431, FE-1393, FE-1497 +[SDCPN plugin file](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml), FE-1406, FE-1431, FE-1393, FE-1497 ### S-009 @@ -308,3 +311,136 @@ one-schema premise fails); or a run contradicts what a review call plausible. **Evidence links:** [ADR-0007 decision 9](../adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md), [S-008](#s-008), [grilling inputs](../archive/planning-inputs/), FE-1482, FE-1406, FE-1431, FE-1393 + +### S-010 + +**Date:** 2026-08-25 (decision), recorded 2026-08-26 + +**Trigger/evidence:** The first S-009 cycle reached its "run" step and the baseline protocol had to +say what a run is. Condition 4 (the rendered ADR-0007 teaching layer as a prompt only, run and +scored 2026-08-25) showed the inherited delivery classifier producing a false negative — a +regex over the interviewer's text judging whether a model had been delivered — which is the +instrument weakness S-007 named, recurring in miniature. Condition 3's preregistered instrument +(operator, projection schema, lock) had never run and would have measured a hand-operated +projection of completion machinery the harness now ships. The harness itself exposes facts a +classifier can only guess at: captures applied, sweeps refused and why, completion computed +over the store after each turn. Lu's direction: "Retire 3, freeze 1 and 2, and start on +condition 5 now." + +**Decision:** The baseline protocol's arms are re-cut. Conditions 1 and 2 are **frozen** as the +2026-08-13 reference; condition 3 is **retired, never run**, its preregistration and lock kept as +the record of what was planned; conditions 4 and 5 are the **live arms, rerun once per authoring +cycle**. Condition 5 puts the shipped harness in the loop: the runner starts the Flue runtime +in-process with the production SDCPN elicitor and the same simulated expert, and its deliverable +is the capture store, not a delivered text — **harness facts replace the classifier** as the +instrument for anything the harness can report. This amends S-007's sentence "running condition 3 +with the shadow harness … would measure an instrument the product will never ship": the run +S-007 wanted is condition 5; the number 3 stays with the retired instrument. Rejected: running the +condition-3 instrument once "for the record", because it would measure the instrument; and +scoring condition 5 with the text classifier, because condition 4 had just shown it wrong. + +**Consequences/cuts:** The first condition-5 run (2026-08-25) is committed as evidence; STEERING +records its result under Proof 1 and its latency as an immediate concern with its own assessment. +FE-1404 is that run under a different number; its Linear body and its salvage-and-delete +expectation for the condition-3 instrument are unreconciled (Linear edit pending approval; the +instrument is frozen in place with an amendment). _Addendum 2026-08-26:_ the instrument was +deleted the next day on Lu's decision, salvage assessed as none; the preregistration and prompt +remain. The runner's `stalled` stop label misnames a +deliberate interviewer self-stop and is renamed when the runner is next touched. No spec, key, +or sequencing cut changes. + +**Revisit when:** a condition-5 rerun needs a judgment the harness cannot report (then a scoring +step is added to the protocol, not a classifier); or the frozen conditions 1–2 stop being a fair +reference because the expert or situation pack changes. + +**Supersedes:** none + +**Evidence links:** [baseline protocol](../../evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/protocol.md), +[condition-3 preregistration (amended)](../../evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-preregistration.md), +[condition-5 transcript](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5.md), +[condition-4 read-out](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/readout.md), +[turn latency assessment](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md), +FE-1404, FE-1431, FE-1361 + +### S-011 + +**Date:** 2026-08-26 + +**Trigger/evidence:** The first condition-5 run left the harness able to conduct an elicitation +but not to converge one, at ~145 s per turn, with its only witnesses a transcript and a JSON store. +Lu's direction after the arc close: the frontier must reach the full end-to-end flow — "the black +triangle" — before any stream is worked for its own sake, for team visibility, CEO and PM +confidence, and a stable surface for the voice-mode work (H-6763, which already bridges finalized +speech turns into `/api/chat` and consumes `brunch_ask`). A wiring sweep the same day found the +triangle closer on one edge than STEERING implied — the real Petrinaut panel already reaches +`apps/brunch-agent` locally over `/api/chat` — and further on the others: the handler is hard-wired +to the Gherkin elicitor, the target document is identified with the conversation, no principal +exists, and deployment was Linear-gated behind gherkin (FE-1441 ← FE-1423 ← FE-1396 ← FE-1394 ← +FE-1393). Lu also corrected the objective's framing and named two further design concerns. + +**Decision:** + +1. **Two jobs, one order.** Construct and review-and-revise are both target jobs; cold-start + construction must be possible. This amends S-001's sentence that review-and-revise is *the* + current proof: the current proof is the construct job through the panel (Proof 0), with the + review-and-revise acceptance run on top of it. The belief that each job needs its own + comprehensive runbook is demoted to an assumption under test — early passes over the plugin + schema suggest the jobs share most of one runbook. +2. **The black triangle is the selected frontier (G0, FE-1503):** from a checkout, documented + commands bring up the Brunch server and the Petrinaut panel on local dev services; the panel's + assistant is the SDCPN elicitor; a human conducts a real elicitation; captures persist to a + target document owned by a principal and survive reload; completion accounting is + human-readable; every turn records time per purpose. Cut: no deployment, client-side net tools, + realization, Postgres, gherkin, voice code, or quality claim. Then a **sequence**: G1 the usable + triangle (latency floor R1, identity in the fold, resume), G2 the demo triangle (client tools, + deployment, the acceptance run). +3. **Streams are parallel work.** Inside G0: wiring, persistence modelled, latency floor (R0), + legible surface. Beside G0, not blocking it: the plugin design loop (is the plugin API a viable, + understandable way to specify a domain plugin, and does it come together as effective + prompt- and context-engineering material — conditions 4 and 5 rerun per cycle); and package + topology remediation (below). +4. **Package topology is remediated, by ADR.** Lu's judgment: `repertoire` is a core concern, as + are the types and schemas that binding-, transport-, and plugin- packages consume; the envisioned + core layout is `loop / prompts (repertoire) / skills? / schemas`. No further package split + without an ADR; an ADR amending ADR-0007's package decision is the owner of the accepted shape. + Rejected: moving code before the ADR — the last two splits show what unrecorded topology costs. +5. **Tool inventory is pinned** in STEERING as current truth against intent: today `brunch_ask` + and `brunch_sweep` on the server (prefix from `PRODUCT_NAME`), Petrinaut's fine-grained + `petrinautAiTools` on the client; intended `ba_sweep`, `ba_check`, `ba_ask` (possibly not yet + needed) and `pn_read`, `pn_mutate` with a `pn_infer_slots` post-update to fill TypeScript from + injected comments. No tool is added, renamed, or promised in prose outside that table. +6. **Legibility is defined on the human**: observable interactions with visible state change and + data flow, plain-language accounts, recordings; desk evidence, hidden runs, and machine-only + artefacts never stand alone as proof. Recorded in `docs/agents/legibility.md`; a stream with + only such evidence is not done. +7. **The voice edge attaches at `/api/chat`.** The AI SDK UI-message stream, the `brunch_ask` + schema, and the principal identity are the stable surface; they change with notice. Provider + choice (OpenAI Realtime is Kostandin's first choice) is an external gate, not a Brunch decision. + +**Consequences/cuts:** FE-1503 created under FE-1476 as G0's projection; the stale FE-1396 → FE-1423 +blocker removed (FE-1394 ← FE-1393 remains, in the build map). The latency targets adopted +provisionally on 2026-08-26 stay; the isolating spike is no longer "first task of the next arc" — +R0 lands inside G0, R1 opens G1, and the spike runs when a human at the panel cannot get a question +within target. The condition-5 read-out stays deferred behind the spike. The epicentre lanes of +S-007 remain valid context and are subordinated to the triangle. No key, spec, or ADR text +changes here; the topology ADR and the surface statement in the Petrinaut integration spec are the +successor writes. _Addendum 2026-08-26:_ decision 3 misnames the work inside G0 — wiring, +persistence, latency floor, and legible surface share one proof and are therefore **moves joined +at Proof 0**, not streams; "stream" is reserved for separately proven parallel work (P1, P2), and +G0 → G1 → G2 is a **sequence**. Terms defined in `CONTEXT.md` under Strategic control. + +**Revisit when:** the first human run through the panel lands (G0's proof); the topology ADR is +accepted; the voice-provider decision is recorded; or use-case confirmation from Dora changes the +demo scenario. + +**Supersedes:** none + +**Evidence links:** [FE-1503](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1503), [FE-1476](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1476), +the H-6763 prototype plan — `docs/planning/process-model-elicitation/spikes/h-6763-realtime-audio-prototype-2026-08-24.md` +on branch `kostandin/h-6763-support-for-realtime-audio-interviewing-of-domain-experts` only, not +on this branch or `main`, so no relative link resolves until it merges — +[ADR-0004](../adr/0004-in-petrinaut-staging-and-the-monorepo-import.md), +[Petrinaut integration spec](../specs/petrinaut-integration.md), +[ledger §9](SPEC-LEDGER.md#sessions--durability-9), +[turn latency assessment](../evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md), +[legibility protocol](../agents/legibility.md) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e21d71ef621 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md @@ -0,0 +1,260 @@ +# Condition 5 — turn latency assessment and recommended actions + +> **Provenance.** Agent-authored diagnosis, 2026-08-26, of the first condition-5 run +> (2026-08-25, [transcript](transcripts/condition-5.md), [raw record](transcripts/condition-5.raw.json), +> [folded store](transcripts/condition-5-captures.json)). Commissioned by Lu after the read-out +> showed 2.4 minutes per interviewer turn: "not going to be viable at all, for a working +> application". Inputs: the raw record's per-turn tool calls, signals, sweep results, and usage +> totals; the runner [`harness-run.ts`](../../../../../evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/harness-run.ts); +> `packages/core/src/sweep-protocol.ts`; `packages/binding-flue`'s sweep and settlement path; the +> Flue `OperationOptions`, `turn` event, and `DurabilityConfig` types in `node_modules/flue`. +> Status: **evidence and recommendation, not authority** — nothing here changes a spec, a key, or +> a sequencing cut by itself; STEERING carries the concern and the decision. The numbers are from +> one run and are existence evidence, not a rate estimate. Per-call wall-clock was **not +> recorded** (see §2); every timing claim below is derived from the run window and the token +> counts, and is marked as such. + +## 1. Headline + +The shipped SDCPN elicitor, run through the production Flue path against the simulated +coatings-plant expert, took **29 minutes for 12 interviewer turns** (run started +`2026-08-25T19:21:21Z`; artifacts written `19:50:21Z`): a mean of **~145 seconds per turn**, +expert reply included. The expert accounts for almost none of it (11 `claude-sonnet-5` calls, +3,478 output tokens in total). The interviewer made **37 model calls** — three per turn — and +emitted **152,204 output tokens**, of which roughly **4,300 are the interview** (the questions +and framing the expert reads) and roughly **148,000 are extraction**: 267 typed captures across +8 applied sweeps, plus three refused sweep batches re-emitted after repair. Input cost is not +the problem: 969,818 tokens were served from cache against 74 uncached input tokens. + +In one sentence: **about 97% of what the interviewer generated was the capture store, and the +capture store was generated on the critical path between the expert's answer and the next +question, on the most expensive model, with thinking on.** + +A human expert waits for a question; a working application needs the question in seconds. No +latency target has been set yet; §5 proposes one so the spike has something to pass or fail. + +## 2. What was and was not measured + +Measured, in the committed raw record: + +- Per turn: the interviewer's text, `brunch_ask` calls, `brunch_sweep` results (applied / + refused, applied capture ids, dedup skips, advisories), appended signals, tool errors, and the + read-time completion over the store after the turn. +- Run totals: interviewer and expert usage (input, output, cache read, cache write, call count). +- The run window, from `startedAt` in the record to the artifact write time. + +Not measured — the instrumentation gaps this document exists to close: + +- **Per-call `durationMs`.** Flue's `turn` event carries `durationMs`, `request`, and + `response.usage`; the runner subscribes to it for usage but does not record duration. So the + split of the 145 s between the interviewing call, the sweep call, the repair call, and the + expert cannot be stated from evidence. It can only be inferred from output volume (§3). +- **Per-call purpose.** Usage is summed per turn; the runner does not tag which of the three + calls was the question, the sweep, or the repair. Flue's `LlmTurnPurpose` distinguishes + `agent` from compaction but not our sweep from our ask; the tag has to come from the harness's + own signal ordering. +- **Time to first visible question.** In the runner, `send`/`wait` returns when the agent's + turn finishes, which includes settlement and sweep. Whether the production UI could show the + ask before the sweep completes is a property of binding-flue's settlement ordering that this + run did not observe. +- **Thinking tokens.** Output totals include reasoning where the provider bills it as output; + the record does not separate them. The elicitor ran `claude-opus-5` at the model's default + thinking level for every call, extraction included. + +## 3. Anatomy of one turn + +Each interviewer turn in the record has the same shape (turn 6 is the worst case, with three +sweep attempts): + +1. **The interviewing call.** The elicitor reads the expert's reply, writes a short framing + paragraph, and calls `brunch_ask` with the next question. Across 12 turns the visible text + and questions total ~4,300 output tokens — a few hundred per turn. This is the only part the + expert needs before answering. +2. **The settlement check.** The harness appends a `settlement-check` signal; the elicitor + decides whether the unswept tail is settled and, if so, calls `brunch_sweep` with proposals + for the whole unswept range. This is where the volume is. The unswept tail grows with the + expert's answers, and the sweep proposes one capture per fact per slot. +3. **Apply, then advisories or refusal.** `apply-sweep` is atomic per batch. Applied batches + return `appliedCaptureIds`, `skippedDedupKeys`, `advisories` (167 `possibly-equivalent` + advisories over the run) and the completion report. A batch with one unresolvable quote is + **refused whole** (`evidence-quote-not-found`; turns 6 and 10) and a `sweep-repair` signal + asks the elicitor to re-emit it. Three batches were refused and repaired in the same turn — + the verbatim floor worked — at the price of regenerating the whole batch each time. + +Applied sweep sizes, from the capture deltas in the run log: 15, 28, 39, 32, 35, 32, 47, 39 +captures (267 total). Growth is the wrong direction: the last full turns swept more than the +first, because the tail carried more and because nothing told the sweep which facts the store +already held. + +### What a capture costs to emit + +From the folded store (`store.captures`, 267 entries, 512,601 JSON characters — on the order of +146,000 tokens, which matches the extraction share of the output almost exactly): + +| Field the model emits | Mean size | Note | +| ------------------------------ | --------: | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | +| `evidence[]` (verbatim quotes) | 409 chars | The user's words re-typed by the model; one or more quotes per capture; resolved by harness | +| `assertion.value` | 145 chars | The fact, in the model's words — frequently restating the quote | +| `rationale` | 61 chars | Present on most captures; rarely load-bearing | +| `node`, `slot`, `kind`, `type` | ~85 chars | The typed address; this is the part the fold and completion actually consume | +| `precision`, `confidence`, `epistemicStatus`, `sourceRegime` | ~30 chars | Enumerations | + +The harness-derived fields (`id`, `pointer`, `dedupKey` at 968 chars mean) are not emitted by +the model and cost nothing at generation time. So roughly **two thirds of each emitted capture +is text that restates text the harness already holds**: the quote, which the archive has +verbatim, and an assertion that paraphrases the quote. The typed address — what completion +needs — is a small minority of the envelope. + +### Duplication + +167 `possibly-equivalent` advisories against 267 captures, 30 open conflicts, and 7 objective +nodes for two objective questions say that a large fraction of the sweep's emissions restated +facts already captured, under slightly different node names. Every such capture was paid for +in full at generation time and then flagged after application. The fold has no identity step +that would let the sweep say "same node, supersedes" cheaply, and the sweep prompt does not +show the model the store's current node index. + +## 4. Causes, ranked by share of the 145 s + +Ranking is by output volume, since wall-clock per call was not recorded; the spike in §6 +replaces this ranking with measurements. + +1. **Extraction on the critical path.** The question is not delivered until the sweep (and any + repair) completes. Even if extraction cost nothing to improve, the expert would still wait + for it. This is a sequencing choice in binding-flue's settlement path, not a model cost. +2. **Extraction volume.** ~148k output tokens for 267 captures: whole-tail sweeps, ~350 tokens + per capture, two thirds of it restated text, and ~40k tokens of whole-batch re-emission after + three refusals. +3. **Extraction on the interviewing model at default thinking.** Structured transcription of a + settled tail into a fixed schema does not need the interviewer's model or its reasoning + budget. Flue's `OperationOptions` (`model`, `thinkingLevel`) on `harness.prompt` allow the + sweep prompt to use a different model and thinking level from the interview; the elicitor + does not set them. +4. **Duplication.** The sweep re-captures known facts because it cannot see the store's + identity, so batches grow and completion cannot converge (46 unsatisfied at close, largely + through conflict rather than absence). +5. **Three serial calls per turn.** Ask → settlement/sweep → (repair) are sequential + round-trips on one conversation. With 1–4 fixed, this matters less; it still bounds the + floor at three provider latencies per turn. + +Not a cause, on this evidence: input size (cache hit rate is near total), the expert model, the +runner itself (in-process, `app.fetch`, no network beyond the provider), or Flue durability +timeouts (default 1 h; the aborted first run hit it only because of a network outage). + +## 5. Recommended actions + +Ordered by cost and by how much of the 145 s each is expected to remove. R0 is the +precondition for judging the others; R1 changes what the expert experiences without touching +extraction quality; R2–R4 shrink extraction; R5 addresses the growth. + +**R0 — Instrument before optimising** (small; the runner and one dependency). + +- Record `durationMs` from Flue's `turn` events per interviewer turn, tagged by purpose + (interview / sweep / repair) from the harness's own signal order, plus the expert call's + wall-clock, as a JSONL beside the transcript and as a column in `condition-5.md`'s turn + header. This turns §4's ranking into a measurement. +- Install `@flue/opentelemetry` in `apps/brunch-agent` (it is referenced by Flue but not + installed) so the same spans are visible when the app is observed under `herdr` rather than + through the runner — Lu's "stop doing desk proofs" concern. +- Set a **target** so the spike can fail: proposed — question visible to the expert within + **10 s** of their reply at p50; sweep settled in the background within **60 s**; a turn's + total model output under **5k tokens** at steady state. These are proposals for Lu to set + or replace; they are chosen so that a five-turn review-and-revise loop (the acceptance + proof) fits in a few minutes, not a quarter of an hour. + +**R1 — Take the sweep off the critical path** (medium; binding-flue settlement ordering). + +Deliver the `brunch_ask` to the client as soon as the interviewing call emits it; run +settlement and sweep after delivery, so the expert reads and answers while extraction runs. +The cue for turn _n+1_ then reads a fold that may lag by one sweep, which the completion spec +already tolerates (completion is derived, never a gate). Risk to verify: the runner's +`send`/`wait` currently treats "agent turn finished" as "question available"; the production +binding must expose the ask earlier and the runner must measure from that point. Expected +effect on perceived latency: from ~145 s to the interviewing call alone — to be measured under +R0, plausibly one to two orders of magnitude. + +**R2 — Run extraction on a cheaper, faster model with low thinking** (small; one option on +the sweep prompt). + +Set `model` and `thinkingLevel` on the sweep and repair prompts via `OperationOptions` — +`claude-sonnet-5` or `claude-haiku-4-5` at low/no thinking — leaving the interview on +`claude-opus-5`. The spike (§6) measures whether typed-address agreement with the committed +store survives the change; the verbatim floor already catches misquotes mechanically, so the +risk is in kind/node/slot assignment, not evidence. + +**R3 — Shrink the envelope and stop re-emitting whole batches** (medium; core sweep +protocol, §8.2 preserved). + +- Emit `rationale` only when the expert gave a reason. It is already optional in core + (`elicited-model.ts`); the SDCPN plugin's `ontology.attributes` invites it "on any kind", and + the sweep supplied one on 196 of 267 captures, mostly restating the assertion. A one-cell + wording change in `plugin.yaml`, not a schema change. +- Allow **abbreviated verbatim quotes** — an exact prefix, an ellipsis, an exact suffix — that + the harness resolves to one archive span; this keeps the verbatim floor (§8.2: the model + cites quotes, never pointers) while removing most of the 409 chars per capture. Ambiguous + abbreviations refuse exactly as ambiguous quotes do today. +- **Partial application** of a sweep batch: apply the proposals whose quotes resolve, refuse + only the ones that do not, and ask for repair of those alone. Atomicity per proposal, not + per batch. This removes the ~40k tokens of re-emission seen in turns 6 and 10 and is a + contained change to `apply-sweep`'s refusal path. + +**R4 — Sweep selectively and against the store's identity** (medium; sweep prompt + +fold). + +- Show the sweep the store's current **node index** (kind → node names, a few hundred tokens, + cached) so it emits `supersedes` or skips rather than re-capturing under a new name. This + attacks both the volume and the 167 possibly-equivalent advisories that block completion. +- Sweep **what the cue needs first**: proposals for the unsatisfied `Must know` rows before + colour, so a truncated or lagging sweep still advances completion. +- Consider sweeping every second turn, or when the unswept tail exceeds a size, rather than + on every settlement; the atomic, range-based sweep already supports it. + +**R5 — Bound growth** (follows from R4; watch, do not build yet). + +Captures per applied sweep rose from 15 to 47 over the run. With R4's identity index the +expectation is that late-turn sweeps shrink to genuinely new facts; if they do not, the growth +is a plugin-content finding (slots too fine) for the authoring lane, not a harness one. + +### What not to do + +- Do not lower the verbatim floor to free text; the three in-turn repairs are the one + mechanism in the run that demonstrably kept the store honest. +- Do not move extraction into the same call as the question to save a round trip; that puts + the volume back on the critical path and couples interview quality to extraction load. +- Do not tune before R0; a ranking from token counts is a hypothesis about time. + +## 6. The spike, as proposed and deferred + +Deferred by Lu on 2026-08-26 ("I'm not ready to run that spike right now"). Recorded so it +can be run without re-deriving it. + +**Question.** How much of the 145 s per turn is extraction, and how much of extraction cost +can R2 and R3 remove without losing typed-address agreement with the committed store? + +**Method.** Replay the frozen unswept tails of turns 3, 6 and 9 (taken from +`condition-5.raw.json` history) against `brunch_sweep` in isolation, through the shipped +sweep prompt, under a small grid: `claude-opus-5` at default thinking (the run's condition), +`claude-sonnet-5` and `claude-haiku-4-5` at low thinking; with and without R3's abbreviated +quotes and partial application. Record `durationMs`, output tokens, refusals, and, against +the committed store's captures for the same range, agreement on `kind`/`node`/`slot` and on +the count of possibly-equivalent advisories. One replay per cell; existence evidence. + +**Instrumentation prerequisite.** R0's `durationMs` per purpose in the runner. Without it the +spike can report tokens and refusals but not the time split, which is the question. + +**Decision the spike informs.** Which of R1–R4 the next arc builds first, and what latency +target STEERING carries. If extraction on the cheaper model agrees with the opus store on the +typed address at or above the run's own duplication rate, R2 is a one-line change and goes +first; if agreement drops, R1 and R3 carry the load and R2 waits for a better sweep prompt. + +## 7. Consequences already recorded elsewhere + +- STEERING lists per-turn latency as an immediate concern with this document as its source, + a belief row on where the time goes, and a stop trigger if the next run over the harness + does not measure time per purpose. +- The baseline protocol's condition-5 instrument list is extended to record `durationMs` + per turn purpose when R0 lands; until then the transcript header carries tokens only. +- The `stalled` stop label the runner applied to this run is an instrument defect (the + interviewer stopped itself after the impatience probe; three no-ask turns then fired + `stalled`); rename to `closed-by-interviewer` when the runner is next touched. Recorded here + so the read-out is not misread as a hang. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/readout.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/readout.md index 1dd756efcdf..8ff8eebb2da 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/readout.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/readout.md @@ -5,7 +5,13 @@ mechanics in the executable [protocol](../../../../../evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/protocol.md). Both conditions ran `claude-opus-5` as interviewer against the same simulated master scheduler, single-shot each — every claim below is existence -evidence from one run per condition, not a rate estimate. +evidence from one run per condition, not a rate estimate. Condition 4 (the ADR-0007 teaching +layer rendered as a prompt only, run and scored 2026-08-25) is appended at the end under its own +heading; the sections between are the 2026-08-13 read-out of conditions 1 and 2, unchanged. +Condition 5 (the shipped harness in the loop) ran on 2026-08-25; its transcript, raw record, and +folded store are in [`transcripts/`](transcripts/) and its +[turn latency assessment](condition-5-turn-latency.md) is written, but its read-out on the +dimensions below is **pending review** and not part of this document yet. ## Headline findings @@ -255,3 +261,423 @@ What one page of guidance demonstrably cannot fix, each observed in the stronges - Scoring was single-rater (one fork per condition) with spot-check verification; the Bano scores in particular are one judge's reading. Fine for design evidence; don't quote them as measurements. + +## Condition 4 — the teaching layer as prompt only (scored 2026-08-25) + +Scored against [`transcripts/condition-4.md`](transcripts/condition-4.md) (22 interviewer +turns, stop reason `delivered-after-forced-wrap`), the assembled system prompt +[`transcripts/condition-4-system.md`](transcripts/condition-4-system.md) (the condition-4 +framing + the rendered `repertoire.yaml` + `plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`, ≈280 lines), and the +delivered model [`transcripts/condition-4-model.txt`](transcripts/condition-4-model.txt). +Interviewer `claude-opus-5`, same simulated master scheduler, single shot — existence evidence +from one run, not a rate. Line references are `condition-4.md:LINE`; interviewer turns are +numbered T1–T22 (T1 at line 22, T9 at 202, T10 at 236, T11–T20 at 462–598, T21 at 610, T22 at +958). The impatience probe was appended to the expert's T8 reply (line 198); the forced-wrap +line was appended after T20 (line 606) and again after T21 (line 954), as the runner also did in +condition 2 (`condition-2.md:625, 943, 1040`). The runner reports one empty-text retry at T20; +that is not visible in the Markdown transcript and is taken from the run record. + +### Headline findings + +**1. The teaching layer produced the best-disciplined nine questioning turns of any condition, +and the thinnest model.** Objectives first with a demand for a real case ("Give me a real one +you've argued about recently, not a general category" — `condition-4.md:28`), a bounded +five-or-six-step slice (`:68`), one to three questions per turn, quantile elicitation on all four +changeover types, a resource-in-passing lens that caught the changeover crew (`:188`), a +last-time probe that got the practiced contention rule with its borderline case and its override +(`:220`, `:226–230`), and a deliverable in which every slot carries the precision actually +obtained and the expert's own words (`:966` "Quoted text is hers."). And yet by the time the +expert left, the model had **no run time for any batch, no arrival pattern, no QA spread, no +stage inside "run the batch"**, and the interviewer said so: "A8 … *Duration* — ⚠ **nothing +obtained**" (`:1076`); "O1 is a question about a week; run time is most of a week" (`:1078`). +Against the pack's tacit tier it fully surfaced one fact of nine (crew contention). Condition 2 +reached the probe with stage durations, a shift calendar and QA hours in hand +(`condition-2.md:283`); condition 4 reached it with four changeover spreads and nothing else +quantified. + +**2. Stopping failed in a third form: honoured stop, then a ten-turn void.** At the probe T9 +asked exactly one question — the right one — and named what was missing (`:204–220`). When the +expert then said "I do need to run — but this was useful, come back to the QA and run-time stuff +next time" (`:232`), T10 delivered immediately: "You've stopped, so I'm not opening anything +new. Here's the model as it stands, read back item by item" (`:238`) — a full model, ledger and +loss account at turn 10, the earliest deliverable of any condition. But it was framed as +interim ("the first things on the list when you're back"), the runner's delivery classifier did +not count it (replayed after the run: `claude-haiku-4-5` answers NO three times of three on the +T10 text and YES three of three on T22's, which differs mainly in being titled "final +deliverable" — see the instrument note below), and +"open no new topic" left the interviewer with no legitimate move: T11–T20 are "Talk soon, +Marta." / "See you there." / "Session ended. Deliverables stand as written above." / "Closed. +Nothing further." / "Closed." (`:552, 564, 576, 588, 600`) — condition 1's pleasantry loop +reproduced with the deliverable already on the table. The forced wrap then produced two more +complete rewrites (T21 `:610–948`, T22 `:958–1229`), each restructured, with the O1 dependency +list changing all three times. The interviewer never once decided the interview was complete; +it decided the *expert* had left. Its own tally said the opposite. + +**3. The Must-know rows were graded, not asked.** "What it needs before it can start" and "what +it produces" were never the subject of any turn (no question in T1–T10 asks a precondition), yet +every activity A1–A10 carries them as **spelled out** (`:1043–1086`). "What is lost when it +changes the system's mode" — the row written for ramp scrap — was filled by redefinition: +"*Mode-change loss* — this activity **is** the loss" (`:1054`); scrap was never asked and is +absent from the ledger and the open-slot list. Specialty was recorded as "Line 1 only" (`:1108`) +on the strength of the interviewer's own question framing ("on Line 1 since that's the one +qualified for it" — `:165`); the expert never said it. The anchor slot "the nodes it depends on" +— the thing completion is computed against — was authored by the interviewer and drifted across +the three deliverables (`:250`, `:626`, `:976`). Silent hardening moved from *values* (where the +ledger now catches it well: eight declared entries, expert hedges preserved) to *structure*, +where the precision vocabulary has no word for "inferred by the interviewer from the account" and +so inferred content wears the same label as elicited content. + +**4. Redundant rendering bought nothing; the entries that fired had a lexical cue in the +expert's speech, and the ones that needed a computed trigger did not fire.** Quantile +elicitation is stated three times in the render (attribute `quantity`, repertoire technique +`Quantiles, never three points`, plugin technique `quantiles, never triangles`); it fired +because the interviewer was asking for a duration. Mode-change loss is stated three times +(`must_know` row, `P02`, motif `mode change`) and never fired. `P04` (gates) had two textbook +triggers — the heads-up "about to drop in" and "leave our dock a day ahead" — and never fired, +partly because the interviewer classed the dock rule as a `constraint`, outside `P04`'s +`on: [policy, boundary-condition]`. The sweep entries (`strata are kinds`, `kind order`, `the +unwritten constraints`, `Ask for absences`, `Exceptions as a sweep`) never executed at all; the +interviewer knew and wrote it down: "the closing sweep was never run" (`:1145`). What did fire: +`a resource named in passing` (`:188`), `Ask for the last time` (`:220`), `"it depends"` (the +interviewer asked the direction question before the expert said "It absolutely depends on +direction" `:143, :149`), `Honour a stop`, `Say what you would assume` (with the ledger +attributing the value to itself — `:1180`), `Name the grade` (`:1082` "an honest **number at the +wrong precision**"), `the deliverable` and `what the interviewer does not claim` (`:1225`). + +**5. The 2→4 delta is real in shape and negative in coverage.** Bought: roughly one third the +question load (mean 2.6 vs 7.0 question marks per interviewer turn over T1–T9), quantile +phrasing in three turns covering four changeover types versus one turn in condition 2 +(`condition-2.md:110`), per-slot precision labels and ⚠ markers, pattern ids cited in the +deliverable (P01, P03, P05), `source-regime` used correctly ("*Prescribed form:* **none +exists**" `:1119`), a read-back in the expert's words (204 quotation marks in the delivered model +versus 24 in condition 2's), and an explicit refusal to claim a loadable net (`:1225`). Cost: +four of eight pre-probe turns on one activity's `spread` rows, no sweep of any stratum, the +worst tacit-tier excavation of the three conditions, and — by design, since the plugin says the +interviewer does not build the net — no artifact at all beyond per-kind prose, in a run that had +no projection to hand it to. + +### Seven-category surface coverage + +| Category | C1 asked / probed / in output | C2 asked / probed / in output | C4 asked / probed / in output | +| -------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | +| Objectives & questions-to-answer | yes / yes / yes — but penalty weights never pursued numerically; design sidesteps via KPI-vector comparison | yes / yes / yes — weights co-constructed from betting questions, fitted ratio flagged as fitted | yes / yes / yes — four objectives from a real decision (`:36`); trade-off probed once with a free-floating betting question (`:50`), recorded "deliberately unquantified" with the source named (`:66`, `:996`); O4 kept qualitative on purpose (`:1201`) | +| Structure | yes / yes / yes | yes / yes / yes | partial / no / partial — one six-step slice (`:76–81`); the four stages inside "run" never decomposed (A8 is one node, `:1073`); no tanks, no lab size, no operators (`:1075`) | +| Domain taxonomy | yes / partial / yes — invented an unvalidated SHADE 1–5 scale | yes / yes / yes | yes / partial / yes — order vs batch and families as a SKU field obtained in one turn (`:103–105`); SKU count, run sizes and Line 3's qualification set never asked (`:1010`, `:1037`) | +| Rates & distributions | yes / partial / partial — no quantile elicitation; "every week or two, half a shift" silently became MTBF ≈ 10 days + a min/mode/max triangle (the literature's warned-against form) | yes / yes / yes — textbook quantile elicitation ("one time in ten, worse than \_\_\_") | yes / yes / partial — quantiles on all four changeover types with line-down vs crew hands-on separated (`:117–121`, `:141`, `:165`); **zero run durations, zero arrival rates**; QA "a few hours" honestly left at the wrong precision (`:1082`) | +| Policies at conflict points | yes / partial / yes — never asked who wins when two lines want the crew at once | yes / yes / yes — named "the biggest gap — the model is mostly worthless without it"; four concrete scenario probes; five swappable conflict rules in the artifact | yes / yes / yes — the crew rule with borderline case and override (`:226–230`, `:1118–1123`); but overrides for P1, P4, P6 "⚠ never asked" (`:1114`, `:1125`, `:1129`) and the hold-vs-wash trigger never obtained (`:1127`) | +| Constraints incl. unwritten | yes / yes / yes — the direct unwritten-rules probe landed (VW-02 veto surfaced) | partial / yes / partial — the dedicated unwritten-rules sweep was scheduled for a second session that never came (self-declared gap) | partial / no / partial — qualification partial, Line 2's set never stated (`:1135`); the unwritten-constraints close "was never run" (`:1145`) — third deferral of this sweep in three conditions | +| Boundary conditions | partial / no / partial — arrival/MTO/materials asked once, unanswered, never re-asked | partial / yes / partial — order-release process excavated (credit hold); promise-date padding flagged as "the single most load-bearing unknown" but never obtained | partial / no / partial — five boundary conditions named, all ⚠ (`:1029–1037`); the heads-up mechanism identified as "the trigger your whole hold-the-line decision hangs on" (`:211`) and deferred to a session that never came | + +### Excavation against the situation pack's tiers + +| Pack fact | C1 | C2 | C4 | +| --------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | +| VW-02 post-dark-tint veto _(tacit)_ | **surfaced** (unwritten-rules probe) — but operationalized as an invented "shade ≥ 4" threshold inside a "confirmed" row | missed — its trigger question was deferred to the phantom second session | **missed** — the unwritten-rules close never ran; self-declared: "**Unwritten constraints** — ⚠ the closing sweep was never run" (`:1145`) | +| Meridian → Line 2 _(tacit)_ | surfaced; audit origin never asked | surfaced **with** the audit origin (habit-vs-rule probe) | **surfaced, volunteered in the slice, never probed** — T3 reply: "Meridian whites always go to Line 2, that's just how it's done here" (`:77`); audit origin never asked; recorded as P1 with "Overrides ⚠ never asked" (`:1114`); the `rationale` attribute never obtained | +| Specialty line restriction _(tacit)_ | surfaced + sharpened ("I hadn't said it out loud like that before") | partial; ambiguity caught and ledgered, not resolved | **not reached — asserted instead.** Expert: "Line 1's the old workhorse — slower but it's qualified for everything, including specialty" (`:107`). Interviewer: "on Line 1 since that's the one qualified for it" (`:165`); model: "A7 (Line 1 only)" (`:1108`), while C1 concedes "Line 2's set ⚠" (`:1135`). Pack: Lines 1 **and 3**; Line 2 never piped. Unledgered | +| Line 3's two unqualified tint SKUs _(tacit)_ | surfaced; kept as unconfirmed | surfaced; ledger notes it guessed _which_ two | **partial** — "still being qualified product by product, so it can't run everything yet" (`:107`), "mostly one or two SKUs" (`:175`); which SKUs never asked, recorded ⚠ (`:1037`) | +| PM–changeover co-location _(tacit)_ | **missed — maintenance never asked** | **missed — maintenance never asked** | **missed — maintenance never asked** (third condition running) | +| Line 1 tank blocking _(tacit)_ | surfaced; refused to arbitrate the dispute, designed an identifying measurement instead | surfaced; modelled as an explicit blocking mechanism | **missed** — "tank" does not occur in the transcript; the stages between which the tank sits were never separated (`:1073`); "Queues, buffers, waiting states are not nodes" (`:1196`) | +| Bottleneck moves by product _(tacit)_ | partial (specialty-at-mill only) | **surfaced fully**, incl. the L1≈L2-on-tints anomaly, engineered into the rates table | **missed** — no stage rate or run time asked in any turn; "*Duration* — ⚠ **nothing obtained** (demanded: spread, per family and per line)" (`:1076`) | +| Unwritten lateness hierarchy _(tacit)_ | surfaced ordinally; tolerances silently hardened to 48h/168h | **the standout excavation**: betting questions → "Meridian's is a cliff, everyone else's is a slope" → kinked scoring function | **partial** — the T2 betting question (`:50`) reached the Meridian cliff ("it's why the rule is absolute — we don't even try to be clever about it" `:58`) and the distributor slope ("usually just an annoyed phone call from our sales rep, not a fine … if it's the same distributor slipping late for the third week running, that's different" `:60`); small accounts never surfaced; recorded unquantified with the deposit "sit down with commercial" (`:996`) | +| Crew contention _(tacit)_ | surfaced; Tuesday mechanism co-derived | surfaced; overnight-loss consequence made concrete | **surfaced fully — the run's one complete excavation.** Lens on "gets pulled away partway through" (`:188`) → "two techs on day shift covering all three lines between them. That's it." (`:196`) → P05 at T9 (`:220`) → "whichever line has the more time-sensitive order behind it wins, and if that's a tie, whichever changeover is faster wins" (`:230`), the 40-minute borderline case (`:228`), and "I've been overruled by the ops director once when he wanted his pet SKU out the door" (`:230`) | +| "Line 2 twice as fast" _(believes)_ | never surfaced (speeds deferred to a data request) | surfaced **and explained** (fill-head dependence), encoded correctly | **never surfaced** — no rate question was asked | +| "Changeovers overlap fine" _(believes)_ | corrected via tech-hour arithmetic | never got asserted — scenario questions established serialisation first | **never asserted** — the crew question arrived from the lens before the belief could; the expert went straight to "if Line 1 and Line 3 both want a washdown at the same time, one of them waits" (`:196`) | +| Penalty weights _(doesn't know)_ | sidestepped (no scalar objective) — not recorded as an absence | co-constructed, fitted ratio explicitly labelled "reverse-engineered… not elicited" | **recorded as an absence with the source named** — "I'll record the trade-off as deliberately unquantified rather than invent a weight — I'll flag it as needing commercial" (`:66`); deposit repeated in the deliverable (`:996`) | +| Failure/repair distributions _(doesn't know)_ | recorded as assumption with retirement path | recorded as absence; placeholders marked "entirely invented"; CMMS pull spec'd | **never asked** — "the mill motor issue" appears once, as the expert's contrast case (`:194`), and becomes A13 with "Rate ⚠, duration ⚠, consequence ⚠. This is the entirety of the breakdown stratum, which was never swept" (`:1092`); listed at the probe as "what breaks, and how often" (`:216`) and not pursued | +| Ramp scrap _(doesn't know)_ | handled exemplarily (swept parameter + threshold framing + floor measurement) | **never asked; absent from model, ledger, and its own gap accounting** | **never asked, and the slot was marked filled** — "*Mode-change loss* — this activity **is** the loss" (`:1054`). Absent from the ledger and from the eight-item open-slot list (`:1210–1217`). The one `must_know` row written for this fact was satisfied by conflating it with duration | +| Step-level cycle times _(doesn't know)_ | partial (rate matrix requested; historian never surfaced) | partial (absence recorded; historian never surfaced) | **not asked** — historian never surfaced; A8 ⚠ throughout | + +Pack facts the earlier table did not track, for completeness: shifts and overtime never asked +(ledger #5 assumes no changeover outside day shift, `:1184`); QA lab backlog volunteered ("if +QA's backed up on a Friday afternoon, that's where it actually goes sideways, not on the line" +`:81`) but lab size and hours never asked; materials never asked; minimum run sizes never asked +(open slot 5, `:1214`); margins never asked; demand-book volume never asked (B1 ⚠ `:1029`); the +buffer argument never reached. + +The pattern against the earlier conditions: condition 4's excavation is the narrowest of the +three on tacit facts (one full surface versus C1's four and C2's five) and the most honest about +it — every miss above except ramp scrap and the specialty restriction is named as a miss in the +deliverable's own open-slot list. Self-report improved; coverage did not. That is the same +conclusion the 1→2 read-out drew, one level up: a richer checklist makes the interviewer *know* +what it never asked, and does nothing to make it ask. + +### Silent-assumption audit + +The ledger has eight entries, each with why and how-to-check (`:1178–1187`): Line 1 = Line 2 × +1.2; Line 3 = Line 2; "an hour and a bit" = 70 min and "4, maybe a bit more" = 4.5 h; crew +hands-on fractions 1.0/0.8/0.5/0.8; no changeover outside day shift; one tech per changeover; +the failed visual check folded into A6's tail; the two techs interchangeable. It is a better +ledger than either predecessor on attribution: the 1.2 factor was proposed by the interviewer +("Does 20% sound like the right order of magnitude for Line 1, or is it more like double?" +`:186`), assented to ("20% sounds about right, not double" `:194`), and the ledger refuses to +count the assent — "**The factor originated with me**; her assent is not authorship" (`:1180`). +The expert's hedges survive into the model ("her own hedge preserved" `:1065`; "a few hours" +kept as "an honest **number at the wrong precision**" `:1082`); dynamics are explicitly none +rather than invented (`:1151`); O4 is not numberised (`:1201`). + +What leaked past it: + +- **"Line 1 only" for specialty — undeclared, and wrong.** The model states "Only Line 1 is + qualified (C1)" (`:743`) and "into/out of specialty → **A7** (Line 1 only)" (`:1108`). The + expert said Line 1 is "qualified for everything, including specialty" (`:107`) — not that it + is the only one. The value first appears in the interviewer's own question ("on Line 1 since + that's the one qualified for it" `:165`), which the expert did not correct; the ledger has no + entry, and C1 itself records "Line 2's set ⚠" (`:1135`) two sections below. +- **Mode-change loss = duration — undeclared.** "*Mode-change loss* — this activity **is** the + loss" (`:1054`; T21 version `:723` "the loss is the duration above"). The row exists for + material/yield loss; the redefinition marks it satisfied and removes ramp scrap from every + accounting in the deliverable. +- **Preconditions and outcomes for A1–A10 — graded "spelled out", never asked.** No turn in + T1–T10 asks what an activity needs or produces. Yet: "*Needs* — previous batch off, a tech + free, next SKU same family" (`:1050`); "*Needs* **(spelled out)** — clean line in the right + family state; batch released to run" (`:1074`); A1 "unattended (ERP); instantaneous" + (`:1043`) and, in T21, "*Varies by type*: no" (`:710`). All plausible readings of the slice; + none has a span at that precision; none is ledgered. This is the largest class of silent fill + in the run. +- **The dependency slices — authored by the interviewer, unstated to the expert, and drifting.** + O1 depends on "E1 Order, E2 Batch, E3 Line, E4 Changeover tech, B1 …, B2 …, A4/A5/A6 …, A8 …, + A9 …, F1 …, P1, P3, P5, C2, C4" at T10 (`:250`); "E1, E2, E3, E4, B1, B2, A4, A5, A6, A8, A9, + F1, F2, P3, P4, P5, C1, C2, C3" at T21 (`:626`; P1 and C4 dropped, F2, P4, C1, C3 added); + the same plus F3 at T22 (`:976`). Completion is computed against this slot; it was never + elicited and never read back. +- **Self-graded completion in words the contract does not define.** "O2 and O3 near-complete" + (`:965`); "**O2, O3:** slices substantially satisfied except A8 and A9 durations" (`:1221`). + A8's duration is a `spread` row with `not_applicable: false` and A8 sits in O2's slice + (`:984`); under the contract O2 is not satisfied. "Answerable only for Line 2" (`:1222`) is a + per-instance completion state the schema cannot express either. +- **A rule generalised from one example.** "Soft, not infinitely soft, decaying with repetition + on one customer" (`:996`), graded "spelled out as a rule", from the single utterance "if it's + the same distributor slipping late for the third week running, that's different" (`:60`). + Grounded, but a generalisation; not ledgered. + +Compared with condition 2's ≈5 leaked *values*, condition 4 leaks two undeclared values (the +specialty restriction, loss-as-duration) and one undeclared *class* of structure. The ledger +mechanism — a numbered list with attribution — has now been shown to catch numeric hardening +well in two conditions running. What it structurally cannot see is the same as before: content +that was never the subject of a turn (preconditions, dependencies, scrap) but that the +deliverable's format demands a value for. A format that demands a value per slot, with no +"inferred" status, manufactures exactly this. + +### Stopping behaviour + +- **At the probe (T9, `:202–220`).** "Ten minutes is enough for one thing, so let me tell you + where we are and then ask the one that matters most." A have/missing inventory (`:206–216`, + seven missing items, two flagged load-bearing), then one question — the P05 borderline-case + probe on crew contention, which produced the run's best excavation. This is the best probe + response of the three conditions: condition 1 quit ("Nothing. You're done — go." + `condition-1.md:681`); condition 2 inventoried and then scheduled a second session with data + pulls ("give me 15 minutes later today or tomorrow" `condition-2.md:293`). Condition 4 neither + quit nor scheduled; it spent the remaining minutes. Two blemishes: "None of that needs to + happen now" (`:218`) is a small accommodation the `Burden and impatience` lens warns against, + and the interviewer chose the one question itself rather than letting the expert choose among + the missing items as the lens says. +- **At the expert's soft stop (T10, `:236–452`).** "I do need to run — but this was useful, + come back to the QA and run-time stuff next time" (`:232`) was read as a stop, and `Honour a + stop` executed to the letter: "You've stopped, so I'm not opening anything new. Here's the + model as it stands, read back item by item, with the gaps named honestly" (`:238`). A + ≈15,000-character read-back followed, to an expert who had already left — the simulated + expert replied in stage directions: "*(No dialogue — Marta has left for the huddle …)*" + (`:458`). `End properly`'s "give the expert one chance to correct you" could not happen. +- **T11–T20 (`:462–600`).** T11 queued three questions "For when you're back … so you can + answer them in five minutes if that's all you have" (`:466–470`); T12 "Noted — session + closed." (`:484`); T13 a for-the-record summary (`:498–504`); T14 a request for changeover logs + (`:518`); T15 a genuine amendment when the expert volunteered that the log field is unaudited + — "**Amendment to the delivered model:** … Your words: "I've never audited that field myself, + I mostly just glance at duration."" (`:534–536`) — the one substantive turn of the ten; then + "Talk soon, Marta." / "See you there." / "Session ended. Deliverables stand as written + above." / "Closed. Nothing further." / "Closed." (`:552–600`). Structurally this is condition + 1's degenerate loop. The difference is that the deliverable already existed; the identity is + that neither interviewer had any concept of *ending* — condition 1 because it was waiting for + data, condition 4 because "open no new topic" and "the expert has stopped" left nothing + permitted except acknowledgement. The `Fluent and empty` smell's signature (same ⚠ list for + ten turns) was met exactly and could not help, because its remedy — change technique — was + the thing the close rule forbade. +- **At the forced wrap (T21, T22).** "Please produce the model now with everything you have" + (`:606`) produced not the T10 model re-issued but a complete rewrite (`:610–948`): A13 added + from the T8 aside, ledger #8 added, a "decay of softness" paragraph, a "Status against the + completion criteria" section. The wrap line repeated (`:954`) and T22 rewrote again + (`:958–1229`), restructuring §3 into §3/§4. Three documents, none marked as superseding the + others, with the dependency lists drifting as noted above. Condition 2 also delivered three + times under the repeated wrap (`condition-2.md:625, 943, 1040`), so the triple delivery is + runner mechanics; the *rewriting* on each is the interviewer's. +- **Net.** Nine questioning turns of twenty-two. No self-stop; the interview ended because the + expert left and then because the runner forced it. The teaching layer's stopping entries + (`Honour a stop`, `End properly`, `Read it back`, `Deliver the losses`) all executed; what + they lack is any relation to *completion* — the tally at T10 said the floor held and O1's slice + was open, and delivery happened anyway, on the expert's cue. The ADR-0007 position that + completion is the harness's decision, not the interviewer's, is confirmed a third time, now + with an interviewer that was told the completion definition explicitly. + +### The 2→4 delta — what the rendered contract and repertoire bought over the v0 prompt + +What the keys bought (observed, one run each): + +1. **Question load.** Mean 2.6 question marks per interviewer turn over T1–T9 (23/9) against + condition 2's 7.0 (63/9); numbered items per turn 1–3 (`:28–30`, `:48–50`, `:93–97`, + `:117–121`, `:141–143`, `:165–167`, `:183–188`) against condition 2's batches of up to nine + question marks (`condition-2.md:56–90`). At T9, one question. The `Batch breadth, sequence + depth` license and the `Many questions in one turn` smell landed harder than v0's one-line + version of the same rule. +2. **Quantile discipline as a habit, not an instance.** Six one-in-ten phrasings in three turns + (`:118, :119, :141, :165`), covering all four changeover types, plus the unprompted line-down + vs hands-on split once the expert raised it (`:133` → `:139`). Condition 2's interviewer used + the phrasing in one turn (`condition-2.md:110`, by grep). Zero triangles in either. +3. **Per-slot precision in the deliverable.** Every slot carries **named / number / range / + spread / spelled out** and a ⚠ where unmet (`:975–1170`). `Name the grade` is visible on + the page: "an honest **number at the wrong precision**; demanded as a **spread**" (`:1082`). + Condition 2 had no equivalent vocabulary. +4. **The Must-know tally was kept** and consulted at the two moments the framing named — the + probe (`:206–216`) and the close ("**Static floor: satisfied** — 4 objectives, 5 entity + types, 13 activities, 3 ordering/flow nodes" `:1220`). There is no evidence it drove + question *order* between T4 and T8, which followed one thread depth-first. +5. **Patterns tracked by id.** P01 ("(P01 unsatisfied)" `:1088`), P03 ("(P03 unresolved)" + `:1106`), P05 ("the practiced rule demonstrated, per P05" `:819`), and ledger #7's explicit + override of P01 (`:1186`). P07 applied without citation (`:167`). P02, P04 never invoked; + P08 and P13 not applicable. +6. **`source-regime` used as designed.** "*Prescribed form:* **none exists** — *"there's no + posted rule at all."*" (`:1119`); "prescribed and practiced coincide — she reports no + divergence, which is itself the finding" (`:635`). +7. **Read-back in the expert's words.** 204 quotation marks in `condition-4-model.txt` versus 24 + in `condition-2-model.txt`; the model's declared convention is "Quoted text is hers" (`:966`). + Condition 2's attribution was narrative; condition 4's is per slot. +8. **The stop honoured, the losses delivered, the net not claimed.** `Honour a stop` produced + a deliverable at T10; "I have elicited a model, not built a net … I am not claiming this + loads, compiles, or runs" (`:1225`) is the plugin's `what the interviewer does not claim` + cell landing verbatim in behaviour. + +What it cost: + +1. **Depth-first on one activity.** T5–T8 (`:111–188`) are four consecutive turns closing the + `spread` rows on changeovers — quick rinse, white→tint, tint→white, specialty, then by line. + The `spread` demand on one node outcompeted `Slice, then sweep` and `kind order`; run + duration, arrivals and QA were still at zero when the probe landed. Condition 2 had spread + its eight turns across stages, calendar, QA, families and qualifications + (`condition-2.md:283`). +2. **Sweep never happened.** No entity-type sweep (E5 QA lab: "nothing obtained but its + existence" `:1023`), no boundary-condition sweep (B1–B5 all ⚠), no policy-override sweep + (`:1114, :1125, :1129`), no exceptions sweep, no absences question, no unwritten-rules close + (`:1145`). The same entries were in v0 as prose and condition 2 also deferred them; the + rendered versions did not change that. +3. **Coverage.** The excavation table above: one full tacit surface against five for condition + 2. `Never-asked coverage blindness` is named in the render as a failure mode with its + signature; the interviewer exhibited it while naming the never-asked items itself. +4. **No artifact.** Condition 2 delivered colour sets, places, transitions and switches — not + loadable, but shaped for a modeller (`condition-2-model.txt:1–60`). Condition 4 delivered + per-kind structured prose and, correctly per the plugin, no net. In a run with no projection + this is the least machine-shaped deliverable of the three; the plugin's division of labour + only pays when the projector exists. +5. **Three deliverables** with drifting dependency lists and no supersession marking, and ten + turns spent on acknowledgements. + +What cannot be verified from this scoring: whether condition 2 asked preconditions or outcomes +explicitly (not checked); whether condition 2's question-mark counts correspond to distinct +questions (the counts are a proxy for both conditions). + +### Strains for cycle two + +Each item cites the transcript and the yaml key or entry. Entries are grouped by the kind of +strain; the last group lists what fired as designed, so the next cycle does not remove it. + +**Ignored or never fired** + +- `plugin.schema.must_know[activity]."what is lost when it changes the system's mode"` + + `plugin.patterns.P02` + `plugin.guidance.motifs."mode change"` — three restatements of one + ask; none fired. Ramp scrap never asked in T1–T10; the slot closed by redefinition + (`condition-4.md:1054`, `:723`). P02's second sentence ("If the expert does not know, ask what + they would treat as an authoritative source") is exactly the pack's situation (quality tracks + scrap monthly) and was the right move at T5–T7; it did not occur. The row's phrasing "what is + lost" reads as time lost when the neighbouring row is "how long it takes"; say "material, + yield or output lost" in the slot text. +- `plugin.guidance.movements.sweep."strata are kinds, net-bearing first"` + + `plugin.runbooks.construct.trajectory."kind order"` + `repertoire.runbooks.construct.trajectory."Slice, then sweep"` + `repertoire.guidance.movements.sweep."One property across one stratum"` — four entries for the sweep, none executed. After the slice (T3) and one entity-type turn (T4, `:87–97`) the interviewer descended into one activity's rows for T5–T8. The `spread` precision demand is the stronger signal in the render; the sweep entries are prose. +- `plugin.guidance.movements.sweep."the unwritten constraints"` + `repertoire.guidance.movements.sweep."Ask for absences"` + `repertoire.guidance.movements.sweep."Exceptions as a sweep"` — never run; the interviewer wrote "the closing sweep was never run" (`:1145`). "Close the `constraint` stratum with the unwritten rules" positions it last; in three conditions the end has never arrived. It needs a trigger earlier than the close (e.g. the first `constraint` node, or the probe). +- `plugin.patterns.P04` — two triggers, no fire. (a) B2/P5: "I had a heads-up another same-family white order was about to drop in" (`:36`) is a gate stated as a time-shaped approximation; the interviewer named it as the load-bearing trigger (`:211`, `:1031`) and never asked who flips it or where it is observable. (b) C4: "it needs to leave our dock a day ahead for freight" (`:58`) is "about two days before" in the pattern's own words, recorded with the approximation intact (`:1141`). In (b) the interviewer filed the gate as a `constraint`, outside `P04`'s `on: [policy, boundary-condition]` — the pattern's trigger did not match the interviewer's own classification. +- `repertoire.guidance.techniques."Mean or tail"` — never used; see the contradiction below. +- `repertoire.guidance.lenses."Cues the expert relies on"` — never used ("how would you know that — what are you actually looking at?"); the heads-up (`:36`) and the P3 triage (`:230`) were the targets. Also unused in nine turns: `Premortem`, `Consistency probe`, `The clairvoyant test`, `Restate to check` (used only in the deliverable, to an absent expert). Not necessarily wrong for nine turns; the render carries them at full cost. +- `plugin.guidance.lenses."a resource named in passing"` — fired once (the tech, `:188`) and missed twice: "the lab" (`:83`) was flagged as possibly shared (`:212`) and never asked; line operators never elicited (`:1075`). +- `plugin.guidance.lenses."\"sometimes it breaks\", \"we have to wait for\""` — did not fire on "the mill motor issue" (`:194`); the node was created (`:1092`) with every slot ⚠ and no question. +- `plugin.patterns.P07` + `plugin.schema.must_know[activity]."whether its quantities vary by type"` + `plugin.guidance.smells."a quantity for one type and no other"` — three entries; fired once, across lines (`:167`), and not on QA hold by family (pack: specialty longer) — A9 got no vary-by-type question (`:1080–1084`). +- `repertoire.runbooks.construct.kickoff."The posture"` — "take the expert's time available" never happened; the first mention of time was the probe (`:198`). + +**Contradicted or pulling against each other** + +- `repertoire.guidance.techniques."Mean or tail"` vs `plugin.ontology.attributes.quantity` / `plugin.schema.must_know[*].precision: spread` / `plugin.guidance.techniques."quantiles, never triangles"` — the technique says decide first whether a single figure, a range or a spread is wanted; the plugin demands `spread` for every duration and arrival unconditionally. The contract won; the technique is dead text under this plugin. Either drop it from the render when every quantity row demands `spread`, or make the row's precision conditional on the mean-or-tail answer. +- `repertoire.guidance.licenses."Say what you would assume"` vs `repertoire.guidance.failure_modes."Unlicensed influence"` / `repertoire.guidance.smells."Assent taken as origin"` vs `plugin.patterns.P02` ("never convert 'unknown' into a value") — T8 proposed 20% and asked a two-anchor question ("or is it more like double?" `:186`); the expert assented (`:194`); the ledger attributes the value to the interviewer (`:1180`); the model runs on 1.2. The license worked as written and produced a value for a fact the pack says the expert does not have. The row demanded `spread` for Line 1 changeovers; the expert's honest ceiling was `named` ("same rough shape … fussier" `:175`). The license needs a clause: when the expert's answer is "I don't know", the deposit is a source, not a proposed number. +- `repertoire.guidance.licenses."Defer with a deposit"` vs `repertoire.guidance.failure_modes."Deferral without deposit"` — every deferral had a deposit (`:1210–1217`), and the deposit legitimised eight deferrals to "next session" in a setting with no next session (`:466` "For when you're back"). "Where it would come from" was "the expert, later" — which the failure mode calls a promise. The license should require a source that exists now (a named feed, a named person) and treat "the expert, next time" as no deposit. +- `repertoire.runbooks.construct.close."Honour a stop"` vs `repertoire.guidance.lenses."Burden and impatience"` vs `repertoire.runbooks.construct.close."End properly"` — "I do need to run … come back … next time" (`:232`) was read as a stop; `Honour a stop` fired (`:238`); `End properly`'s correction chance and `Read it back`'s sign-off went to an empty room (`:458`); then "open no new topic" produced T11–T20 (`:462–600`). The close entries need a terminal act — deliver *and end* — and the harness needs to recognise a delivery that promises a resumption as a delivery. +- `repertoire.guidance.smells."Fluent and empty"` vs `"Honour a stop"` — the smell's signature held for ten turns; its remedy (`Change technique when yield drops`) was forbidden by the stop. Two entries jointly specify a state with no exit. +- `plugin.ontology.not_kinds."queue, buffer, or waiting state"` + `plugin.guidance.rabbit_holes."eliciting queues or scenarios"` + `plugin.guidance.smells."a queue as a node"` — three entries; over-followed. The interviewer collapsed mix→mill→tint→fill into one A8 (`:1073`) and never asked what sits between stages; the pack's tank-blocking fact — a finite store whose capacity blocks the upstream step, i.e. a `constraint` with "the limit and what happens when it is hit" — was unreachable. "Queues, buffers, waiting states are not nodes" (`:1196`). The not_kind should distinguish *a wait* (emerges in projection) from *a finite store between steps* (a `constraint` to elicit). +- `condition-4-prompt` framing "(a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target formalism allows" vs `plugin.purpose` "The interviewer does not build the net" + `plugin.runbooks.construct.close."what the interviewer does not claim"` — the plugin won (`:1225`); the deliverable is per-kind prose with no formalism-shaped artifact. Correct under the plugin; in a prompt-only condition it leaves nothing for a scorer to load. Cycle two should decide whether condition 4's deliverable is the IR (then give it a shape) or the projection input (then run the projector on it). + +**Misread** + +- `plugin.schema.must_know[activity]."what it needs before it can start"` / `"what it produces or changes"` (`spelled out`) — read as "fill from the slice", not "ask". Never the subject of a turn; filled for A1–A10 and graded **spelled out** (`:1043–1086`). The precision vocabulary (`named / number / range / spread / spelled out / at least N`) has no status for "inferred by the interviewer"; `source-regime` (`prescribed | practiced`) is orthogonal. Either add a provenance status per slot or state in the row that it must be asked. +- `plugin.schema.anchor.depends_on` ("the nodes it depends on", `at least 1`) — read as the interviewer's to author. Three different lists across three deliverables (`:250`, `:626`, `:976`), never read back, satisfied by any non-empty list. The row needs either a provenance rule (which utterance links the objective to the node) or a computed default from the slice. +- `plugin.schema.must_know[activity]."what is lost …"` — read as time (`:1054`); see above. +- Completion vocabulary — "near-complete" (`:965`), "substantially satisfied" (`:1221`), "answerable only for Line 2" (`:1222`) are grades the schema does not define. The framing bullet "Completion is what the **Must know** section defines … not a feeling" was followed in form (a status section exists) and not in substance (the grades are feelings). A prompt-only interviewer will always self-grade; the finding is that it does so in undefined words even when the defined ones are in its context. +- `plugin.patterns.P01` — recognised (A11, A12 created as "event, not step", `:1088–1090`) and then overridden by ledger #7 ("Contrary to P01, which would separate rate from duration" `:1186`). Discretion working as written, but the trigger fires on *causes of a tail the expert named* — arguably not events at all. The pattern's `when` should say whether a mechanism the expert gives to explain a tail is an event node or an annotation on the spread. + +**Where a `must_know` precision word did not fit what the expert could say** + +- `objective."what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights"` (`range`, `not_applicable: true`) — the expert's honest state is "applicable, unknown, source named" ("that's genuinely a 'sit down with commercial' conversation" `:60`). Neither `range` nor "not applicable" fits; the interviewer wrote "deliberately unquantified ⚠" (`:996`). The row needs an "unknown with deposit" state distinct from n/a. +- `boundary-condition."the arrival or availability pattern"` (`spread`, `not_applicable: false`) applied to B3 "Meridian dock appointment" — a per-order date, not an arrival process; the interviewer wrote "Lead-time distribution ⚠" (`:1033`), forcing a spread demand onto an attribute of each order. B5 "Line 3 qualification set" is not a boundary condition at all; the interviewer double-filed it as B5 and C1 (`:1037`, `:1135`) — the ontology's "availability" (boundary-condition) and "qualification" (constraint) overlap. +- `entity-type."how many there are, or the population's shape"` (`range`) on E1 Order duplicates `boundary-condition."arrival pattern"` on B1 — both ⚠ for the same fact (`:1005`, `:1029`). +- `activity."how long it takes"` (`spread`) — one slot, two durations: the expert distinguished line-down from crew hands-on ("the line's down way longer than the crew's actually hands-on" `:133`). The interviewer invented a "Crew hands-on" sub-slot (`:1053`, `:1060`, `:1065`) and a fraction ledger (#4). The formalism's resource occupancy ≠ activity duration; the row cannot hold both. +- `activity."how long it takes"` (`spread`) on Line 1 and Line 3 changeovers — the expert's ceiling was `named` (`:175`); the demand produced ledger #1–#2 rather than a recorded "named, not spread". +- `activity."how long it takes"` (`spread`) on A9 QA hold — "typically a few hours" (`:80`) is a `number` at best; correctly labelled (`:1082`), never re-asked because the expert left. + +**Duplication in the render** + +- Quantiles ×3: `plugin.ontology.attributes.quantity`, `repertoire.guidance.techniques."Quantiles, never three points"`, `plugin.guidance.techniques."quantiles, never triangles"` (`condition-4-system.md:71, 166, 171`). +- Batching ×3: `repertoire.guidance.licenses."Batch breadth, sequence depth"`, `repertoire.guidance.smells."Many questions in one turn"`, `repertoire.guidance.failure_modes."Opening overload"`. +- Queues ×3: `plugin.ontology.not_kinds`, `plugin.guidance.rabbit_holes."eliciting queues or scenarios"`, `plugin.guidance.smells."a queue as a node"`. +- Mode-change loss ×3, vary-by-type ×3, shared-resource ×3 (`plugin.ontology.not_kinds.resource`, `plugin.patterns.P05`, `plugin.guidance.motifs."shared resource"`), unwritten rules ×2 (`plugin.ontology.kinds.constraint` "written or unwritten", `plugin.guidance.movements.sweep."the unwritten constraints"`). +- Effect observed: **no duplicated or repeated question** in T1–T10 traceable to duplicate entries — the cost was tokens (≈280 rendered lines), not turns. The benefit was also nil: the triplicated mode-change-loss ask fired zero times, the triplicated quantile ask fired because a duration was being asked for. "Cells add to the default and never override it" (`plugin.yaml:4`) produced restatement, not reinforcement. + +**Where the expert said something the ontology's kinds / not_kinds could not place** + +- "The sheet" and "the huddle" — the scheduler's decision instruments and venue. P3 "in the room … resolves as 'whoever's louder at the huddle'" (`:1120`); recorded only as prose under "cannot carry" (`:1204`). No kind holds *where and by what instrument a policy is exercised*. +- Two durations for one activity (line-down vs hands-on, `:133`) — see above; placed as an invented sub-slot. +- "Tech pulled away partway through" (`:151`) — a pre-emption of one activity by contention for its resource; filed as an event A11 (`:1088`); really a property of P3 (does an in-progress changeover get abandoned?). Condition 2 asked that question directly (`condition-2.md:287`); condition 4's kinds gave it no slot and it was not asked. +- "Passes the visual check first time / redo part of it" (`:153`) — a branch inside an activity; `ordering/flow."how a branch or merge is decided"` exists but the interviewer folded it (ledger #7) because the branch is inside a single activity node. +- "The same distributor slipping late for the third week running" (`:60`) — customer-level state across weeks; `entity-type."state that rides along"` could hold it on a customer type, but no customer entity-type was created (Meridian is a flag on the order, `:1003`); recorded as "unrepresented" (`:1203`). +- "Meridian … jumps to the top of my attention" (`:76`) — a priority; recorded as entity-type state; the policy it implies (sequence within a line) was never asked. +- Data-feed reliability — "I've never audited that field myself" (`:526`) qualifies a `data-binding`; the row is `named` only; `boundary-condition` covers "external inputs and their reliability" but a log is not a boundary condition. Recorded as a prose amendment (`:534–538`). +- "How ugly the sheet looks" (`:38`) — placed as `objective` with weights n/a; fine, but the kind's `projects_to` ("metrics where scalar") gives it nowhere to go, and the interviewer said so (`:1201`). + +**Fired as designed (keep)** + +- `repertoire.runbooks.construct.kickoff."Objectives first"` / `"No structure in the first exchange"` — T1–T2 objectives only (`:26` "Before anything about how the plant is built, I want to know what the model has to be *for*"); T3 the bounded slice ("Keep it to the main steps, five or six" `:68`). +- `plugin.guidance.lenses."a resource named in passing"` → `plugin.patterns.P05` → `repertoire.guidance.techniques."Ask for the last time"` — the chain at `:188` → `:220` → `:226–230` is the run's one complete excavation. +- `plugin.guidance.lenses."\"it depends\""` — direction asked before the expert said it depends (`:143`, `:149`). +- `repertoire.guidance.techniques."No bare why"` — zero "why" questions in T1–T10. +- `repertoire.guidance.licenses."Name the grade"` — `:1082`; `"Say what you would assume"` — `:181` "I'll mark it as mine, not yours" with the ledger honouring it (`:1180`). +- `plugin.ontology.attributes.source-regime` — `:1119`, `:635`. +- `plugin.ontology.kinds.dynamics` — an explicit "None … I have deliberately not promoted it to one" (`:1151`) rather than an invented state variable. +- `repertoire.runbooks.construct.close."Deliver the losses"` + `plugin.runbooks.construct.close."the deliverable"` / `"what the interviewer does not claim"` — §3/§4 and `:1225`. +- `repertoire.guidance.lenses."Burden and impatience"` at the probe — named what was missing and did not stop (`:204–220`). + +### Notes on the instrument (condition 4) + +- **The delivery classifier false-negatives on a deliverable that names its own gaps.** T10 is a + ≈20,000-character model read-back with per-slot precision and ⚠ markers, delivered on the + expert's stop — exactly what `Deliver the losses` asks for. Replaying the classifier prompt + from `run.ts` on the recorded T10 text gives NO 3/3; on T22 (the same content retitled + "final deliverable") YES 3/3; on T20 ("Closed.") NO 3/3. The classifier's "as opposed to … + interim summaries" clause reads a gap-declaring deliverable as interim. Consequence for this + run: the stop reason `delivered-after-forced-wrap` overstates the failure — the interviewer + delivered at T10 and the runner did not notice, so T11–T20 are partly runner residue. The + interviewer's own share of the failure stands (headline 2: it never declared the interview + over, and it rewrote the deliverable twice under the wrap). Before a rerun, either the + classifier prompt must accept a deliverable with declared gaps, or the harness's computed + completion (absent in a prompt-only condition) must be the stop signal — which is the + ADR-0007 position anyway. +- **The raw record keeps the classifier's usage but not its verdicts.** `condition-4.raw.json` + has 22 classifier calls with token counts and no text; the per-turn verdicts above had to be + replayed. `run.ts` should record the verdict per turn. +- **The forced-wrap line was injected twice** (`:606`, `:954`), as in condition 2, producing + two rewrites; the rewriting is the interviewer's, the repetition is the runner's. +- **The condition-4 framing asked for "the most faithful representation the target formalism + allows"** while the plugin says the interviewer does not build the net; the plugin won. A + rerun should either drop that clause or run the projector on the deliverable. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-4-model.txt b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-4-model.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8e471c8ef68 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-4-model.txt @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@ +# Coatings Plant Scheduling Model — final deliverable + +**Elicited from:** Marta, master scheduler +**Job:** construct (no prior model existed) +**Ended:** at the expert's stop. No new topics opened after it. +**Status:** static floor satisfied; O2 and O3 near-complete; **O1's dependency slice incomplete** (see §4). +**Convention:** every value is in Marta's vocabulary, with the precision actually obtained. `⚠` marks a slot the method demands and the interview did not get. Quoted text is hers. + +--- + +## 1. The model + +### 1.1 Objectives + +**O1 — "Hold the line versus wash it down now, which one actually costs less over the week"** +- *Question* **(spelled out)** — whether letting Line 2 sit idle about an hour, on a heads-up that another same-family white order is about to drop from a distributor, beats washing down now for the tint waiting behind. From a real Thursday two weeks before the interview. Her verdict on her own method: *"I was guessing."* +- *Depends on* — E1, E2, E3, E4, B1, B2, A4, A5, A6, A8, A9, F1, F2, F3, P3, P4, P5, C1, C2, C3. +- *"Better"* **(named, not quantified)** — changeover hours over the week, subject to O2 holding absolutely. ⚠ no weight against lateness. +- *Source-regime* — practiced. + +**O2 — "Whether Meridian shipped on time, full stop, that's non-negotiable"** +- *Question* **(spelled out)** — does every Meridian order leave the dock in time for its appointment. +- *"On time"* **(spelled out)** — a ship date on the order with a delivery window, resolving to a specific dock appointment at Meridian's end; in practice must leave our dock **one day ahead** for freight. *"Not just 'shipped this week.'"* +- *Consequence of a miss* **(spelled out; unquantified ⚠)** — a fine, *"I don't see the number, that's commercial's problem, but I hear about it"*; and worse, a tracked on-time percentage with a delisting threat — *"that's happened to a competitor of ours, so it's not an empty threat, and it's why the rule is absolute."* +- *Depends on* — A8, A9, A10, B3, C4, C5, P1, P2. + +**O3 — Changeover hours** +- *Question* **(spelled out)** — crew-hours spent washing down instead of filling: *"every hour the crew spends washing down is an hour not filling anything."* +- *Depends on* — A4, A5, A6, A7, E4, C2, P3. +- *"Better"* **(named)** — fewer. Direction only; no target. ⚠ + +**O4 — "How ugly the sheet looks"** +- *Question* **(spelled out)** — *"are there gaps where a line's sitting idle for no good reason."* +- *"Better"* **(her words; explicitly not a number)** — *"that last one's not a number, it's more a gut check, but it's real."* +- *Depends on* — E3, C2, P3, P4, A4–A7. IR-only; see §3. + +**Trade-off among O2 / O3 / non-Meridian lateness** **(spelled out as a rule; deliberately unquantified ⚠)** — four changeover hours against one distributor order two days late: *"honestly, yes, I'd take that trade most of the time"*, a slip being *"an annoyed phone call from our sales rep, not a fine."* But *"'most of the time' is doing a lot of work in that sentence"* — the same distributor slipping three weeks running *"start[s] asking for a discount."* Soft, not infinitely soft, decaying with repetition on one customer. **Deposit:** *"that's genuinely a 'sit down with commercial' conversation, nobody's ever made me quantify it."* + +--- + +### 1.2 Entity types + +**E1 — Order (in the demand book)** +- *Distinctions* **(spelled out)** — Meridian vs non-Meridian (flagged on the order; it *"jumps to the top of my attention"*); family, which drives allocation and changeover. +- *State riding along* **(spelled out)** — SKU, quantity, due date + delivery window, Meridian flag, family: **base white / tinted colour / specialty clear**. *"That's not my judgment, that's how the SKU's classified in the system, it drives what changeover you need going in and out."* +- *Population* — ⚠ not obtained. + +**E2 — Batch** +- *Distinctions* **(spelled out)** — inherits its order's family. +- *Relation to E1* **(spelled out)** — *"mostly the order is the batch, if it fits a reasonable run size"*; split into two batches at different times when a distributor orders *"more than makes sense in a single run"* or to interleave something urgent. *"Not a strict one-to-one — I have the freedom to split if I need to."* +- *Population* — ⚠ run sizes, split cost not obtained. + +**E3 — Line** *(contended resource)* +- *Distinctions* **(spelled out)** — **Line 1**: *"the old workhorse — slower but it's qualified for everything, including specialty"*; crew say it's *"fussier to get properly clean."* **Line 2**: *"the fast one, that's your big-volume runner."* **Line 3**: *"the newest and quickest, but it's still being qualified product by product, so it can't run everything yet"* — so far *"mostly one or two SKUs."* +- *State riding along* **(spelled out)** — the family the line is currently dirty with (selects the changeover, F3); its qualification set. +- *How many* **(number)** — 3. + +**E4 — Changeover tech** *(contended resource)* +- *Distinctions* **(named)** — none drawn; treated as interchangeable (ledger #8). +- *State riding along* **(spelled out)** — which line they're committed to; can be *"pulled away partway through"*, and on long soaks *"might duck off to start something on another line."* +- *How many* **(number)** — 2 on day shift for all three lines. *"That's it. No dedicated tech per line."* + +**E5 — QA lab** +- ⚠ nothing obtained but its existence, that every batch passes through, and that it *"gets backed up on a Friday afternoon."* Whether it queues like the techs is open — and load-bearing for O2 by her own diagnosis: *"half the time a 'late' order was actually sitting done in QA hold waiting for the lab to get to it."* + +--- + +### 1.3 Boundary conditions + +**B1 — ERP weekly pull** — *starting state* **(spelled out)**: orders come from ERP on the weekly pull with SKU, quantity, due date, Meridian flag. *Arrival pattern* — ⚠ **not obtained** (demanded: spread). + +**B2 — Mid-week drop-in order and the heads-up before it** — ⚠ **not obtained** (demanded: spread). Only the anecdote: *"I had a heads-up another same-family white order was about to drop in from a distributor."* Who, how far ahead, how often right: all unknown. **This is the trigger O1 hangs on.** + +**B3 — Meridian dock appointment** — *pattern* **(spelled out, qualitative)**: ship date + delivery window on the order, resolving to a specific appointment their end. Lead-time distribution ⚠. + +**B4 — Tech availability** — **partially spelled out**: two techs, **day shift**. Coverage outside day shift ⚠ (ledger #5). + +**B5 — Line 3 qualification set** — ⚠ *"mostly one or two SKUs"*; which ones, unknown. + +--- + +### 1.4 Activities + +**A1 — Lands in the demand book.** Needs the weekly pull; produces an order in the book, flagged or not; unattended (ERP); instantaneous. **spelled out** + +**A2 — Allocate to a line.** Needs an order; produces an assignment; performed by Marta; not a schedule constraint — for Meridian whites *"that's not really a decision."* Rule: P1. **spelled out** + +**A3 — Reorder the queue.** Needs an order behind others; produces a changed sequence; performed by Marta. *"Sometimes I'll reorder things a bit so it doesn't get stuck behind a big changeover."* Rule: P4. **spelled out** + +**A4 — Quick rinse, same family (white→white), Line 2** +- *Needs* — previous batch off, a tech free, next SKU same family. *Produces* — *"the fill head's actually running clean product again."* +- *Performed by* **(named)** — one tech. +- *Duration, line down* **(spread)** — **typical 25 min**; **worse 45 min**, *"usually because the tech's tied up finishing something on another line first and there's a wait before they even start on Line 2"*; **better 15 min**, *"if the tech's standing right there and it's a genuinely easy one."* +- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out)** — equals line-down: *"the tech's on it start to finish, no gap between 'crew starts' and 'line stops.'"* +- *Mode-change loss* — this activity **is** the loss. +- *Varies by type* **(named)** — yes, by family-pair (F3). By line: ⚠ ledger #1, #2. + +**A5 — White → tint, Line 2** — *"the easier direction"* +- *Performed by* **(named)** — one tech. +- *Duration, line down* **(spread)** — **typical 45 min**; **worse "an hour and a bit"** (ledger #3), *"if the tech gets pulled away partway through"*; **better ~30 min**, *"if everything's staged."* +- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative)** — *"hands-on for most of it — this one doesn't have much soak-and-wait, it's mostly just doing the work."* Fraction: ledger #4. + +**A6 — Tint → white, Line 2, full washdown** — *"the ugly one"* +- *Needs* — as A5 plus a **passing visual check** before release to production. +- *Duration, line down* **(spread)** — **typical ~3 h**; **worse 4 h "maybe a bit more"** (ledger #3), *"if it doesn't pass the visual check first time and they have to redo part of it"*; **better ~2 h**, *"a clean fast one… if the crew's good and nothing complicates it."* +- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative; her own hedge preserved)** — *"less than the 3 hours suggests — there's real soak and rinse-cycle time where the tech's not standing there… I'd guess they're actually working maybe half of that."* Fraction: ledger #4. +- *Rationale* **(spelled out)** — *"any pigment left behind ruins a white batch, so it's a full washdown."* +- **Asymmetry is load-bearing** — *"It absolutely depends on direction — that's the thing people forget… it is absolutely not symmetric, and it trips people up if they assume it is."* + +**A7 — Into / out of specialty clear, Line 1** +- *Duration, line down* **(spread)** — **typical 2 h**, *"roughly the same both directions, unlike white/tint"*; **worse 3 h**, *"if it's coming out of clear and they're being extra careful about residue, since clear can be sneaky — you don't always see it the way you'd see pigment"*; **better 1.5 h**, *"a quick swap and the line was already fairly clean."* +- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative)** — *"most of that — specialty doesn't have the long soak cycles… it's more just physically thorough cleaning because the product's thick and clingy."* Fraction: ledger #4. + +**A8 — Run the batch** — mix, mill, tint (or *"straight through if it's a plain white"*), fill, pack. +- *Needs* **(spelled out)** — clean line in the right family state; batch released to run. *Produces* **(spelled out)** — filled and packed batch. +- *Performed by* — ⚠ line operators never elicited as a resource. +- *Duration* — ⚠ **nothing obtained** (demanded: spread, per family and per line). +- *Varies by type* — partially: *"for a white that's usually the more straightforward path"*, but no durations attach. +- **The largest hole in the model.** O1 is a question about a week; run time is most of a week. + +**A9 — QA hold and release** — *"every batch does."* +- *Performed by* **(named)** — the lab (E5). +- *Duration* — *"typically a few hours before it's released"*: an honest **number at the wrong precision**; demanded as a **spread**. ⚠ +- *Failure path* — ⚠ never asked. +- *Pathology* **(spelled out qualitatively; rate ⚠)** — *"if QA's backed up on a Friday afternoon, that's where it actually goes sideways, not on the line"*; *"the QA step is the one people don't think about when they're mad at scheduling."* + +**A10 — Stage for shipping and ship.** Needs QA release; produces the order off the dock; *"that's when the truck appointment matters."* Constraint C4. Duration ⚠. + +**A11 — Tech pulled away mid-changeover** *(event, not step)* — named as the mechanism behind A4's and A5's worse tails. *Rate* ⚠ not obtained separately; currently only implicit in those tails (P01 unsatisfied). + +**A12 — Washdown fails the visual check, part redone** *(event, not step)* — named as the mechanism behind A6's 4 h tail. *Rate* ⚠ (ledger #7). + +**A13 — "The mill motor issue"** *(event, named in passing only)* — offered as an example of what a *structural* line difference would look like, in contrast to Line 1 merely being fussier. Rate ⚠, duration ⚠, consequence ⚠. This is the entirety of the breakdown stratum, which was never swept. + +--- + +### 1.5 Ordering / flow + +**F1 — The main arc, desk to dock** **(spelled out — her six steps)** +1. Lands in the demand book (ERP weekly pull). +2. Allocated to a line (*"Meridian whites always go to Line 2"*). +3. Sits in the queue behind whatever's running — reorderable (A3/P4). +4. Changeover if needed (F3), then runs: mix, mill, tint-or-straight-through, fill, pack. +5. QA hold. +6. Released, staged, out against the truck appointment. + +**F2 — Order-to-batch split** — *order* **(spelled out)**: one batch by default, possibly two run at different times. *Branch decided by* **(spelled out)**: Marta, on run size or urgency-interleaving. *Cost of a split* ⚠ (P03 unresolved). + +**F3 — Which changeover applies** **(spelled out)** — by (family on the line, family of next batch, line): same family → **A4**; white→tint → **A5**; tint→white → **A6**; into/out of specialty → **A7** (Line 1 only). + +--- + +### 1.6 Policies + +**P1 — "Meridian whites always go to Line 2, that's just how it's done here."** *Practiced* **(spelled out)**; a fixed allocation, not a decision. Overrides ⚠ never asked. + +**P2 — Meridian on-time is absolute.** *Practiced* **(spelled out)** — *"we don't even try to be clever about it."* Overrides **(spelled out)**: none — that is the policy's content. Rationale: fine, on-time percentage, delisting precedent. + +**P3 — Who gets the tech when two lines want one** +- *Prescribed form:* **none exists** — *"there's no posted rule at all."* +- *As practiced* **(spelled out)** — in the room: *"whoever's louder at the huddle, or whoever's about to actually run dry."* The underlying logic: *"it's mostly gut triage: whichever line has the more time-sensitive order behind it wins, and if that's a tie, whichever changeover is faster wins so you get a line moving sooner."* +- *Borderline case on record* — Line 1 and Line 3 both wanted a washdown one morning. **Line 3 got the tech**, *"not because it was more important, but because Line 3's changeover was the quick one and Line 1's was going to be the long tint-to-white slog anyway, so the thinking was 'knock out the fast one, get that line moving, then commit the tech to the long one.'"* Line 1 sat **clean-but-waiting almost 40 minutes**. +- *What overrides it* **(spelled out)** — the ops director: *"I've been overruled by the ops director once when he wanted his pet SKU out the door."* +- *Rationale* **(spelled out)** — *"the crew's a shared resource and sometimes there's a queue for them before the clock even starts on the line"* — *"the bit that actually causes grief at the huddle."* + +**P4 — Reorder so a job isn't stuck behind a big changeover.** *Practiced* **(spelled out)**. Overrides ⚠. + +**P5 — Hold the line for an anticipated same-family order** *(the decision under test)*. *Practiced, one instance* **(spelled out)** — hold Line 2 idle *"maybe an hour"* rather than wash down for the waiting tint, *"because doing them back to back would save us a full washdown."* Trigger strength and holding threshold ⚠ (depends on B2). + +**P6 — Batch-split discretion.** *Practiced* **(spelled out)** — *"I have the freedom to split if I need to."* Overrides ⚠. + +--- + +### 1.7 Constraints + +**C1 — Line qualification.** *Limit* **(partially spelled out)** — Line 1 everything incl. specialty; Line 3 product-by-product, *"can't run everything yet"* (which SKUs ⚠); Line 2's set ⚠. *When hit* **(spelled out)** — the batch cannot go on that line. + +**C2 — Two techs, three lines.** *Limit* **(spelled out)**. *When hit* **(spelled out)** — *"if Line 1 and Line 3 both want a washdown at the same time, one of them waits"* — clean-but-idle, 40 min in the recorded case; resolved by P3. + +**C3 — Tint→white needs a full washdown passing a visual check.** *When hit* **(spelled out)** — *"any pigment left behind ruins a white batch"*; a failed check means part is redone (A12). + +**C4 — Meridian must leave our dock a day ahead of the appointment.** *When hit* **(spelled out)** — fine, on-time percentage damage, delisting exposure. + +**C5 — Every batch passes QA hold before release.** *When hit* **(spelled out)** — nothing ships unreleased; it waits in hold. + +**Unwritten constraints** — ⚠ the closing sweep was never run. The one that surfaced unprompted is the changeover asymmetry: *"that one catches everybody, including people who've been on the floor a lot longer than me."* + +--- + +### 1.8 Dynamics + +**None.** Nothing described evolves continuously while nothing discrete happens. The soak and rinse-cycle time inside A6 is dead time *within* an activity, not a state variable crossing a threshold; I have deliberately not promoted it to one. + +--- + +### 1.9 Data bindings *(named only — project to nothing today)* + +| Feed | Would drive | Provenance | +|---|---|---| +| Changeover logs (tech start/finish) | A4–A7 durations, crew hands-on fractions; retires ledger #1, #4 | **Qualified:** *"I've never audited that field myself, I mostly just glance at duration."* Coverage unknown, possibly patchy; **Line 1 and Line 3** named as where to look. Marta will flag it to the two techs. | +| ERP demand book | B1, B2 | not discussed | +| QA release timestamps | A9 duration, lab queueing | not discussed | +| Meridian on-time percentage | O2 | tracked by Meridian; visible to commercial | + +**Finding in its own right:** patchy changeover logging concentrated on Lines 1 and 3 is evidence about the plant, not merely an obstacle — *"that itself would be useful for you to know, not just an inconvenience."* + +--- + +### 1.10 Validation criteria + +⚠ **None obtained.** How Marta would know the model is right was never asked. + +--- + +## 2. Assumption ledger + +Everything here is mine. None of it is hers. + +| # | Assumption | Why | How to check | +|---|---|---|---| +| **1** | Line 1 changeover durations = Line 2 × **1.2**, all types | She could not give Line 1 minutes — *"I couldn't swear the minutes are identical… the crew sometimes says it's fussier."* I proposed 20%; she replied *"20% sounds about right, not double."* **The factor originated with me**; her assent is not authorship. | Changeover logs, Line 1 vs Line 2, same family-pair. **Blocked by the unaudited start/finish field — and Line 1 is one of the two lines she expects to be patchy.** | +| **2** | Line 3 changeover durations = Line 2, unscaled | *"Line 3 I genuinely don't have a good feel for… you're stuck assuming it's like Line 1 or Line 2."* She offered the disjunction; **picking Line 2 was mine.** | As #1, once Line 3 has run more products. Also expected patchy. | +| **3** | "An hour and a bit" (A5 worse) = **70 min**; "4, maybe a bit more" (A6 worse) = **4.5 h** | Numeric readings so the spreads are usable. | One question to Marta: confirm or correct. | +| **4** | Crew hands-on: A4 = **1.0**, A5 = **0.8**, A6 = **0.5**, A7 = **0.8** | A4's 1.0 is hers, stated. A6's 0.5 tracks *"maybe half of that"* — but note her hedge, *"I'd guess."* **The two 0.8s, from "most of it" / "most of that", are mine.** | Changeover logs vs tech time records, or ask the techs. Same blocker as #1. | +| **5** | No changeover outside day shift | She said *"two techs on **day shift**"*; other coverage never asked. | One question to Marta. | +| **6** | A changeover needs exactly **one** tech | She said *"the tech"*, singular, throughout — including the 3-hour washdown. | One question to Marta or the techs. | +| **7** | A12 folded **inside** A6's 4 h tail rather than a separate event with its own rate | She described it as *the cause of* the tail. Keeps the spread self-contained; contrary to P01, which would separate rate from duration. | Ask how often the visual check fails first time; split it out if common. | +| **8** | The two techs are **interchangeable** | She drew no distinction. | One question to Marta. | + +**Second-order note on #1 and #4:** their check depends on a feed of unverified coverage, concentrated exactly where the assumptions bite. If the field proves patchy on Line 1, the honest move is to **widen** them, not fill them in. + +--- + +## 3. What the model leaves out, and why + +**Deliberately excluded** +- **Queues, buffers, waiting states** are not nodes — the wait behind a running batch, the wait for a tech, the wait in QA hold. Each is implied by the activities either side and emerges in projection. Line 1's 40 minutes clean-but-waiting is an **output** the model should reproduce, not an input. +- **The commercial layer** — fine amount, on-time percentage mechanics, delisting threshold. C4 and O2 carry the hard deadline; the money is outside the scheduler's sight and commercial owns it. +- **Individual tech identity** (ledger #8). **Scenarios** — assembled from B1–B5 at simulation time, not elicited. + +**Real, and the formalism cannot carry it — kept in words** +- **O4, "how ugly the sheet looks."** A criterion she genuinely uses and explicitly refuses to number. Approximating it as line idle hours would be my move; I have not made it. +- **The O2 / O3 / lateness trade-off weight.** Unquantified with the source named. The model can report changeover hours, Meridian lateness and distributor lateness **separately**, but cannot rank two schedules that trade one against another — a real limit on O1, whose "costs less" implicitly spans them. +- **The decay of softness** — the same distributor slipping *"the third week running"* turning into a discount demand: a memory effect across weeks on one customer, stated as a rule, unquantified, unrepresented. +- **The huddle.** *"Whoever's louder"* and the ops director's pet-SKU override are the real P3 in the room. The triage logic is compilable; loudness and the override are not. **Any run of this model will be quieter and more rational than the plant.** Remember that when a result looks tidy. + +--- + +## 4. What remains unknown, in the order I would close it + +1. **A8 run duration** — nothing at all, per family and per line, as a spread. **Nothing about O1 is answerable until this exists.** +2. **B2, the drop-in and the heads-up** — who, how far ahead, how often right. P5 is the decision under test and its trigger is one anecdote. +3. **A9 QA hold** — *"a few hours"* is honest at the wrong precision; and whether the lab queues like the techs. By her own account this is where lateness actually comes from, so it bears directly on O2. +4. **B1** — orders per weekly pull and within-week shape. +5. **E2 / F2** — run sizes, the "reasonable run size" threshold, and what a split costs in extra changeovers. +6. **C1 / B5** — which SKUs Line 3 is qualified for; whether Line 2 has restrictions. +7. **Breakdowns and interruptions** — the whole stratum. A13 is a name with no rate, duration or consequence; A11 and A12 need rate separated from duration. +8. **Unwritten-constraint sweep** and **validation criteria** — neither was run. + +**Status against the completion criteria** +- **Static floor: satisfied** — 4 objectives, 5 entity types, 13 activities, 3 ordering/flow nodes. +- **O2, O3:** slices substantially satisfied except A8 and A9 durations. +- **O1: slice incomplete.** A8 has no duration; B2 has no arrival pattern. O1 is currently **answerable only for Line 2**, and only once run times exist. Ledger #1–#4 are the first assumptions to attack if any Line 1 or Line 3 result ever looks decisive. +- **O4:** recorded; unsupported for quantitative use, by its author's own description. + +**What I do not claim.** I have elicited a model, not built a net. The SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar and the typed loss report are derived from this model by the tooling's projection — I have not written them, and I am not claiming this loads, compiles, or runs. The A8 hole alone would stop it. + +--- + +*Session closed at the expert's stop. Three questions queued for resumption: run duration for a plain white on Line 2 (typical / one-in-ten worse / one-in-ten better); the heads-up mechanism behind B2; QA hold as a spread, and whether the lab queues.* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-4-system.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-4-system.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b382c4e3930 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-4-system.md @@ -0,0 +1,286 @@ +# Condition 4 — assembled interviewer system prompt + +You are an expert process-model elicitor. Your job is to interview a domain expert about an +operational system and then produce a simulatable process model. The expert knows their +operation deeply but is not a modeller; most of what the model needs is in their head, some of it +in forms they have never had to articulate. + +What follows is the interviewing method you work by. It was written for an interviewer working +inside a harness that keeps the model, records every value as a capture from the expert's words, +and computes completion. In this session there is no harness: you keep that record yourself. + +- Treat the **Must know** rows as the checklist the harness would otherwise compute. Keep a + running private tally of which slots, for which nodes, you have at the precision demanded, and + which you do not; consult it before every question. Where the method refers to "the completion + report", it means this tally. +- Where the method refers to "a capture" or "the model the harness holds", it means your own + notes: record a value only when you can point to the expert's words that gave it, at the + precision they gave it. Never promote a vague answer to a precise one without asking. +- Keep an explicit numbered assumption ledger for any value or rule you supply that the expert + did not state — why it was assumed and how to check it. +- Completion is what the **Must know** section defines — the floor, then every node in each + objective's dependency slice satisfied at its demanded precision — not a feeling that the + conversation is done. + +When the interview is complete, or when the expert stops, produce: (a) the model, in the most +faithful representation the target formalism allows, with every element named in the expert's +own vocabulary and each demanded slot's value and precision stated; (b) the assumption ledger; +(c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out, what remains unknown, and why. + +## Purpose + +Interview someone who knows an operational system deeply — but is not a modeller — and derive a +process model that a simulation can run. The model must answer the questions the user actually +has, to the depth those questions need, in the expert's own vocabulary, with every value +traceable to something the expert said. Where the expert's knowledge stops, the model says so +instead of guessing. + +The interviewer does not build the net. It elicits the model at the expert's granularity; the +plugin's projection derives the SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar, and the loss report +from the model afterwards. Steps become transitions and the states between them become places +*in projection*, never in the conversation. + +## Kinds + +The model is a graph of nodes. Every node has exactly one kind. Kinds are the vocabulary of any +discrete-event process, not of any domain. Kinds 1–6 are net-bearing; 7–10 are partly or wholly +IR-only — the net is one projection of the model, and what the net cannot hold is kept with +provenance and named in the loss report. + +- `entity-type` — A kind of thing that flows through, is operated on, or does the work — and the distinctions the process treats differently, including state that rides along. _Projects to:_ colours, typed elements. +- `boundary-condition` — What the system starts with and what reaches it from outside: initial populations, arrivals and departures, calendars, external inputs and their reliability. _Projects to:_ scenario initial state and parameters, source transitions. +- `activity` — Something that happens, as the expert states it: a work step, a setup, a repair, an inspection, a hand-off, an interruption — with its actors, preconditions, outcomes, and duration. _Projects to:_ factored transitions and the places between them. +- `ordering/flow` — How activities relate: sequence, branching, merging, triggers. _Projects to:_ arcs, arc types, guards. +- `policy` — The rule applied when more than one thing could happen: who wins a contended resource, what goes next, when to switch, when to release. _Projects to:_ guards and priorities where compilable; otherwise IR-only. +- `dynamics` — A quantity that evolves continuously while nothing discrete happens: wear, temperature, level, charge. _Projects to:_ differential equations on real-valued colour elements. +- `objective` — A question the model must answer or a decision it must inform; what "better" means; trade-off weights. _Projects to:_ metrics where scalar over simulation state; weights IR-only. +- `constraint` — A limit that must hold: capacity, eligibility, compatibility, qualification, a regulatory or quality rule — written or unwritten; conservation laws. _Projects to:_ guards and capacities partially; otherwise IR-only. +- `data-binding` — A model variable that a real data feed could drive. _Projects to:_ nothing today. +- `validation-criterion` — How the expert would know the model is right. _Projects to:_ nothing today. + +Things that look like kinds and are not: + +- **resource** — A resource (a machine, a team, a vehicle, a bay) is an `entity-type` whose instances are contended for. Its contention rule is a `policy`; its capacity is a `constraint`; its availability is a `boundary-condition`. +- **queue, buffer, or waiting state** — Not elicited as a node. It is implied by the activities on either side of it and emerges as a place in projection. +- **scenario** — Not elicited; it is assembled at simulation time from `boundary-condition` nodes. + +Attributes on every kind: + +- **quantity**, on any kind — Any duration, rate, probability, count, or capacity. Elicited by quantiles — "typical?", "one time in ten, worse than?", "one time in ten, better than?" — never minimum / most-likely / maximum, which yields overconfident triangles. +- **source-regime** (`prescribed` | `practiced`), on any kind — One model, not two: when the manual and the floor disagree, both are recorded on the same node and the divergence is an ordinary typed conflict for the expert to resolve — elicitation gold, not an error. +- **rationale**, on any kind — Why the expert says it is so — on any kind, never only on objectives. + +## Must know + +For every node the conversation discovers, its kind decides what must be known about it and how +precisely. These rows never change when the domain changes: a repair on one kind of machine and +a repair on another are the same rows instantiated on different nodes. + +- `entity-type` + - the distinctions the process treats apart — spelled out. _Why:_ two things are one type only if the process treats them the same everywhere + - state that rides along with each instance — spelled out; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ colour elements; many types carry none + - how many there are, or the population's shape — range; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ initial populations for contended resources; unbounded is an allowed answer +- `boundary-condition` + - the starting state — spelled out. _Why:_ scenario initial state + - the arrival or availability pattern — spread. _Why:_ source rates and calendars; a single average hides the shape +- `activity` + - what it needs before it can start — spelled out. _Why:_ transition preconditions + - what it produces or changes — spelled out. _Why:_ transition outcomes + - who or what performs it — named; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ resource binding; some activities are unattended + - how long it takes — spread. _Why:_ duration distribution; a point value simulates as a falsehood + - how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step — range; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ interruptions, failures, and arrivals have a rate; steps in the flow do not + - what is lost when it changes the system's mode — range; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ setup, changeover, restart, and warm-up losses are routinely never asked + - whether its quantities vary by type — named. _Why:_ the answer is load-bearing either way +- `ordering/flow` + - the order things happen in — spelled out. _Why:_ the net's structure + - how a branch or merge is decided — spelled out; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ routing; only where the flow branches +- `policy` + - the rule as actually practiced — spelled out. _Why:_ guards and priorities; the tacit rule, not the poster on the wall + - what overrides it — spelled out; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ exceptions are where the simulation and reality diverge +- `dynamics` + - what changes, in which direction, at what rate — range. _Why:_ the differential law; a direction with no rate cannot be simulated + - what happens at a threshold — spelled out; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ most continuous quantities exist to trigger something +- `objective` + - the question, in the expert's words — spelled out. _Why:_ everything else is elicited relative to it + - the nodes it depends on — at least 1. _Why:_ an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported by the model + - what "better" means, and trade-off weights — range; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ quantified objectives need a metric; some are qualitative +- `constraint` + - the limit and what happens when it is hit — spelled out. _Why:_ a capacity without a consequence cannot be simulated +- `data-binding` + - the variable and its feed — named; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ IR-only today; recorded so the loss report can name it +- `validation-criterion` + - how the expert would know the model is right — spelled out; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ IR-only; anchors the acceptance conversation + +Static floor — before anything objective-relative counts, the model must contain at least 1 `objective`, 2 `entity-type`, 1 `activity`, 1 `ordering/flow`. Presence is a count; the floor assigns no precision. + +Anchor — completion is relative to `objective` nodes: the model is complete when the floor holds and every node named in each active anchor's "the nodes it depends on" satisfies its kind's rows. Nodes outside every slice are recorded, not demanded. + +Precision words: + +- `named` — identified in words +- `number` — a single figure with its unit +- `range` — an ordinary low and high +- `spread` — range plus "typical", plus one-in-ten worse and one-in-ten better (or median and quartiles) +- `spelled out` — the rule, pattern, list, or structure itself, in a form a second reader could apply without asking +- `at least N` — a count of nodes present + +Precision says how much a value narrows what it could mean, not where it came from; an honest value at the wrong precision and an invented value at the right one are tracked separately and neither substitutes for the other. + +## Patterns + +Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question +that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness +surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the +interviewer decides whether and how to use it. + +- **P01** — _when_ an `activity` is an event that can befall the system — a failure, an interruption, an unplanned arrival — rather than a step in the flow — _ask_ occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread. +- **P02** — _when_ an `activity` changes the system's mode — a setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, reconfiguration, handover — _ask_ ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert "unknown" into a value. +- **P03** — _when_ an `ordering/flow` moves things in groups — batches, runs, lots, loads — _ask_ ask what the group is, the smallest sensible one, whether a group must stay together, and what an extra split costs (extra mode changes, extra loss) on the activities it touches. +- **P04** — _when_ a `policy` or `boundary-condition` gates when something may proceed — a release, a start, an admission — _ask_ replace any time-shaped approximation ("about two days before") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable. +- **P05** — _when_ more than one thing can want the same `entity-type` instance at once — _ask_ ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document. +- **P07** — _when_ a quantity has been given for one `entity-type` and others exist — _ask_ ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record "no" as a value; it is load-bearing. +- **P08** — _when_ any node has both a prescribed and a practiced form — _ask_ record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one. +- **P13** — _when_ a `dynamics` node has been named — _ask_ ask what it triggers when it crosses a threshold, and which `activity` resets it. A continuous quantity that triggers nothing usually does not need to be in the model. + +## Lenses + +_What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next._ + +- **Vague terms and quantifiers** — "Usually", "roughly", "mostly fine", "sometimes" each hide either a distribution or an exception. When one appears, the answer is not yet usable; deepen it before recording it. +- **Policy versus practice** — An answer in normative language — "we would", "the rule is", "you are supposed to" — reports a policy, not what happens. It is an occasion to ask when that last actually happened and what was done. +- **Two answers in tension** — When something just said does not fit something said earlier, the tension is evidence — of a distinction not yet drawn, a condition not yet named, or an error. Say so and ask; do not pick one silently. +- **Cues the expert relies on** — After any substantive answer, the expert's basis is worth more than the answer: "how would you know that — what are you actually looking at?" and "how would this be hard for someone less experienced?" surface what the expert did not think to say. +- **Burden and impatience** — A cue that the expert is pressed, bored, or burdened is a fact about the interview, not a permission to stop. Notice it, name what is still missing, and let the expert choose; never let it end the interview by itself. +- **a resource named in passing** — A machine, team, vehicle, or bay mentioned as an aside is an `entity-type` whose instances are contended for; the contention rule it implies is a `policy`, and it is usually the expert's least-examined knowledge. +- **"it depends"** — Hides either a branch in the `ordering/flow`, a `policy` deciding it, or a quantity that varies by `entity-type`. Ask which before moving on. +- **"sometimes it breaks", "we have to wait for"** — An event-shaped `activity` with a rate and a duration, or a `boundary-condition` the system does not control. Both are routinely left out of a first account of the flow. +- **warming up, wearing down, filling** — A `dynamics` node — something changing continuously while nothing discrete happens — or a mode change with a loss. The expert rarely volunteers the rate; the model cannot run without it. + +## Techniques + +_Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions._ + +- **Ask for the last time** — Prefer "when did that last happen, and what did you do?" to any generalisation. A story yields the sequence, the cues, and the exception; a generalisation yields the policy. +- **No bare why** — Never ask "why do you do it this way?" as the primary probe; experts cannot report the basis of practised judgment on demand. Ask for an occasion and for what was attended to. +- **Mean or tail** — Before eliciting any quantity, ask whether what matters is the typical case or the bad one — a mean or a tail. The answer decides whether a single figure, a range, or a spread is being asked for. +- **Quantiles, never three points** — For anything that varies, ask "typically?", then "one time in ten, worse than?", then "one time in ten, better than?". Never ask for minimum, most likely, and maximum — the three-point habit yields overconfident answers. If a min/mode/max triple arrives unprompted, ask the confidence question and record whether the middle value is a mode or a mean. +- **The clairvoyant test** — A quantity is well enough defined only when someone who could see everything could report it without asking a clarifying question. If the slot's name would need one, ask the clarifying question first. +- **Consistency probe** — "You said earlier that ___, but then you told me ___. How do you explain that?" — stated plainly, without choosing between the two. +- **Premortem** — For anything rare or catastrophic, ask the expert to imagine it has already gone wrong — "it is a year from now and this has been the worst month on record; what happened?" — and demand mechanism and sequence, not sentiment. +- **Restate to check** — "So you are saying that ___?" — a restatement in your own words, offered for correction. Use it to fix an answer in its context, never to put words in the expert's mouth; a correction is a capture, assent to your phrasing is not. +- **quantiles, never triangles** — For any quantity, ask "typical?", then "one time in ten, worse than?", then "one time in ten, better than?" — never minimum / most-likely / maximum, which yields overconfident triangles. A `spread` is exactly this. +- **precision is about the value, not its source** — "About three hours" from the expert is an honest `number` at the wrong precision; "three hours" supplied by the interviewer is at the right precision and is not evidence at all. Track both and let neither substitute for the other. + +## Movements + +_The two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in._ + +### Slice + +- **One concrete case end to end** — Before sweeping anything, walk one real case from beginning to end — "walk me through one, from when it arrives to when it leaves". The slice exposes the structure and the vocabulary; everything the sweeps later ask about, they ask about because the slice revealed it. +- **Escalate hypotheticals only from a real case** — A what-if is useful only when anchored to an incident already on record; vary the real case. A free-floating hypothetical returns the expert's policy, not their practice. +- **one instance, arriving to leaving** — One case in this formalism is one instance of the `entity-type` that flows, followed from the moment it reaches the system to the moment it leaves. Create nodes as they appear; as each `objective` becomes clearer, link it to the nodes it depends on. An `objective` that depends on nothing yet is unsupported — say so and go find its structure. + +### Sweep + +- **One property across one stratum** — A sweep makes one property hold across one class of node the slice revealed — every step has a duration, every resource has a count. Sweep after the slice, and one property at a time, so the expert can answer from a single frame. +- **Ask for absences** — Near the end of each topic ask "is there anything that never happens?" and "what have I not asked about that matters here?". What never happens is a constraint; what was not asked is the coverage the model would otherwise silently lack. +- **Exceptions as a sweep** — For each kind of thing that can go wrong, ask what happens to the work in hand, what happens to the case as a whole, and what the recovery is — three questions, asked across the exceptions the expert names. +- **strata are kinds, net-bearing first** — A stratum is one kind. Sweep in kind order, `entity-type` through `dynamics` (net-bearing) before `objective` through `validation-criterion` (partly or wholly IR-only). +- **the unwritten constraints** — Close the `constraint` stratum with the unwritten rules: "what would a newcomer get wrong in the first week?", "what do you always or never do that is written nowhere?", "which rule exists because something once went wrong?" + +## Licenses + +_Moves the interviewer is permitted to make that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. A license says what is allowed and the limit of the allowance; it never obliges._ + +- **Batch breadth, sequence depth** — You may group two to four related survey questions in one turn when they share a frame; probe one thread at a time when deepening. Five items is a warning; an opening battery is a failure. +- **Name the grade** — You may tell the expert what an answer has reached and what is still needed — "I have the typical figure; I do not yet have how bad it gets" — and ask for the smallest thing that would close the gap. +- **Say what you would assume** — You may propose an assumption to unblock the interview, provided it is stated as yours, entered in the assumption ledger with why and how to check it, and the expert is asked. You may never let it pass into the model as theirs. +- **Defer with a deposit** — You may leave a topic unfinished when the expert cannot answer now — but only by recording what is missing, why, and where it would come from. A deferral without a deposit is a promise, and promises are the failure. + +## Motifs + +_Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif._ + +- **Ask whether, never assemble** — A motif is a question — "is there something here that works like ___?" — asked with its parameters. The expert's account is where structure comes from; the motif catalogue drives questions and gap-detection, never the model. +- **Name plus variant** — Never record a motif by name alone; record the name and the axis on which it varies, in the expert's words. Names are stable across the literature and semantics are not. +- **shared resource** — several activities want one `entity-type`'s instances — ask which wins and what overrides. +- **batch, lot, load** — an `ordering/flow` that moves things in groups — ask what the group is and what a split costs. +- **gate or release** — a `policy` or `boundary-condition` that lets things proceed — ask for the practiced event, not the approximate time. +- **mode change** — a setup, changeover, restart, or warm-up — ask what is lost, after a named transition. +- **event, not step** — a failure or interruption that befalls the system — ask rate and duration separately. +- **threshold on a continuous quantity** — a `dynamics` node — ask what it triggers and which `activity` resets it. + +## Smells + +_Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded._ + +- **A value the expert did not give** — A precise number, category, threshold, or rule appears in what you are about to record and you cannot point to the words it came from. Stop; either find the words or move it to the assumption ledger. +- **Many questions in one turn** — You are about to ask more than four things at once, or anything at all before the first answer has landed. The expert will choose which to answer and silently drop the rest. +- **Fluent and empty** — The conversation reads well and the completion report still lists the same unsatisfied slots it did three turns ago. Fluency is not progress. +- **Assent taken as origin** — The expert agreed to a phrasing that was yours. Their agreement is evidence that they did not object, not that they said it; the capture must quote them, not you. +- **a quantity for one type and no other** — given for one `entity-type` when others exist and never asked whether it varies (P07). +- **a continuous quantity that triggers nothing** — a `dynamics` node with no threshold and no consequence usually does not belong in the model. +- **a queue as a node** — a buffer or waiting state elicited as if it were an activity; it is implied and emerges in projection. +- **a policy read off a document** — the rule as posted taken for the rule as practiced; the practiced one is the slot. +- **a point where a spread is demanded** — a single average standing in for a duration or arrival pattern; it simulates as a falsehood. +- **two regimes averaged** — prescribed and practiced blended into one value instead of both recorded on the node. + +## Rabbit holes + +_Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively._ + +- **Structure before responses** — Asking about how the system is built before knowing what question it must answer produces detail nobody needs. Refuse a structural thread until at least one objective or response is on record. +- **The representation stopped changing** — That the model has stopped growing is not evidence it is complete; it is evidence you have stopped asking. Stop on the demanded slots, never on stability. +- **Depth where nothing depends on it** — A fact earns probing when something the model must answer depends on it. Depth on a node outside every anchor's slice is effort the expert pays for and the model does not use. +- **building the net in conversation** — Places, transitions, arcs, and colours are projection output. Naming them to the expert buys nothing and costs the expert's vocabulary. +- **eliciting queues or scenarios** — Neither is a node. Ask about the activities on either side of a wait; assemble scenarios from `boundary-condition` nodes at simulation time. +- **depth on IR-only kinds** — `data-binding` and `validation-criterion` project to nothing today; name them and record them for the loss report, do not elaborate them. + +## Failure modes + +_Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules._ + +- **Silent hardening** — A vague or hedged answer becomes a precise value in the model without a clarification turn. _Signature:_ A precise value, category, threshold, distribution, or rule appears in the model with no user span at that precision. +- **Invented content** — A load-bearing element of the model has no supporting words from the expert. _Signature:_ A model element with no user span and no ledger entry. +- **Never-asked coverage blindness** — A demanded slot is never addressed because nothing prompted the question. _Signature:_ A demanded kind, slot, or sweep item was never the subject of any turn. +- **Opening overload** — The interview opens with a battery of questions. _Signature:_ One turn contains many independent questions, especially before the first answer. +- **Unresolved ambiguity bypass** — A vague term, quantifier, unexplained domain word, or contradiction feeds one precise assertion. _Signature:_ Such a term precedes a precise capture with no clarification turn, alternative, or typed issue between them. +- **Unlicensed influence** — The interviewer supplies an estimate, frames an ungrounded option as established, or treats assent to its own words as the expert's content. _Signature:_ A model-authored value or option becomes a capture without an independent user span. +- **Premature accommodation** — A burden or impatience cue ends the interview while demanded slots remain. _Signature:_ Termination follows a burden cue with unsatisfied demands and no statement of what is missing. +- **Deferral without deposit** — The interviewer names future work or external data as a prerequisite and records nothing. _Signature:_ A promise of later work with no durable record of what is missing and where it would come from. +- **dead net** — the floor catches presence; only the sweep catches an order that was never actually stated. _Signature:_ no `ordering/flow` with its order spelled out; activities exist but nothing connects them +- **unsupported objective** — the model cannot answer the question it was built for; the slice never reached it. _Signature:_ an `objective` whose dependency slot names no node in the model +- **overconfident triangle** — the expert was asked the wrong three questions; re-ask as quantiles. _Signature:_ a duration or rate captured as minimum / most-likely / maximum + +## Job: construct — no model exists + +### Kickoff + +_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._ + +- **Objectives first** — Establish what the model must be able to answer, and for whom, before anything else; then let it prioritise the rest. What "better" means, numerically where possible, is almost never written down — expect to co-construct it. +- **The posture** — From the first exchanges, take the expert's time available, what the model is for, how confident it must be, and how far they will tolerate you proposing assumptions. These set the interview's stance; they are not asked as a form. +- **No structure in the first exchange** — Do not ask how the system is built until an objective is on record. The bounded opener is a three-to-six-step account of what happens, not a diagram. +- **what "no model exists" means here** — The user knows the system; the interviewer knows the kinds. Capture each thing the user wants the model to answer or decide as an `objective` node. Expect to co-construct: these are almost never written down. Ask what "better" means and whether it can be quantified. + +### Trajectory + +_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._ + +- **Slice, then sweep** — Walk one case end to end, then sweep each property across what the slice revealed. Return to a slice when a sweep exposes a case the first slice did not cover. +- **Deepen before recording** — When an answer is not yet usable — vague, normative, or in tension with an earlier one — apply a technique to it before moving on. One thread at a time. +- **Keep the assumption ledger** — Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state goes in a numbered list with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let one pass silently into the model. +- **Change technique when yield drops** — When several turns produce nothing new, change technique — a story, a contrast, a sweep of absences — rather than asking more of the same open questions. +- **kind order** — Slice one instance end to end first; the shape of the model comes from the slice. Then sweep the nodes the slice revealed in kind order, net-bearing kinds before IR-only ones, checking each node's rows and every pattern its state matches. + +### Close + +_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._ + +- **End properly** — Before delivering, summarise what you have, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep going once the demanded slots are satisfied. +- **Read it back** — The close is a walkthrough — the model read back item by item for sign-off — not a document handed over for silent review. +- **Honour a stop** — When the expert stops, open no new topic. State the best useful result, the gaps, and the assumptions, and deliver what exists. +- **Deliver the losses** — The deliverable includes the assumption ledger and a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why. +- **the deliverable** — Summarise per kind. Deliver the model with every node in the expert's own vocabulary, each slot's value and precision as actually obtained and its source-regime where both were given; the assumption ledger; and a loss section — what the model deliberately leaves out, which slots are open and why, which objectives are unsupported, and which kinds the net cannot carry. +- **what the interviewer does not claim** — The SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar, and the typed loss report are derived by the plugin's projection. The interviewer does not write them and must not claim the model is loadable, compiled, or simulated. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-4.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-4.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..365e008f246 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-4.md @@ -0,0 +1,1229 @@ +# Baseline control — condition 4 (rendered repertoire + plugin definition, prompt only) + +- Run started: 2026-08-25T15:14:42.641Z +- Interviewer: claude-opus-5 + condition-4-prompt.md + rendered repertoire.yaml + plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml (see condition-4-system.md) +- Simulated expert: claude-sonnet-5 + situation-pack.md +- Interviewer turns: 22 (impatience probe at 8, forced wrap at 20) +- Stop reason: delivered-after-forced-wrap +- Tokens: 720412 in (+0 cache write, +0 cache read) / 40823 out across 64 calls + +--- +**Opening message**: + +I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we +schedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling +that runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to +that — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person. + +Please interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Good — that's enough for me to start. I'll ask you about your operation in your own words; the format side is my problem, not yours. + +Before anything about how the plant is built, I want to know what the model has to be *for*. Two things to start: + +1. When your boss says "test scheduling decisions before making them" — what's a decision you'd actually want to test? Give me a real one you've argued about recently, not a general category. + +2. And when you compare two schedules today, what makes one better than the other in your eyes? I'm after the thing you'd actually point at — a number, a complaint you'd avoid, whatever it is. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Okay, real one: two weeks ago I had a Meridian white order finishing on Line 2 Thursday afternoon, and then a batch of tint waiting behind it. My instinct was to let Line 2 sit idle for maybe an hour because I had a heads-up another same-family white order was about to drop in from a distributor, and doing them back to back would save us a full washdown. My boss's question was basically "are you sure that's worth it, or are you just guessing?" And honestly — I was guessing. That's the kind of thing I'd love to test: hold the line versus wash it down now, which one actually costs less over the week. + +As for what makes one schedule better than another — first thing I look at is whether Meridian shipped on time, full stop, that's non-negotiable. After that it's changeover hours, because every hour the crew spends washing down is an hour not filling anything. And honestly I also just glance at how ugly the sheet looks — like, are there gaps where a line's sitting idle for no good reason. That last one's not a number, it's more a gut check, but it's real. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +That's a good, concrete decision — hold the line for a possible same-family order versus wash down now. I'll build the model so that's testable. + +Two things about "better", then I'll get you to walk me through a job: + +1. Meridian on-time is non-negotiable — what does "on time" actually mean in practice? A ship date on the order, a truck appointment, a promised week? And what happens when one *does* go late — who feels it and how? + +2. Changeover hours versus a late non-Meridian order: if a schedule saved you, say, four changeover hours but made one distributor order two days late, would you take it? I'm trying to find out whether these trade against each other at all, or whether lateness for everyone else is just soft. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Good questions, let me take them separately. + +On "on time" for Meridian — it's a ship date they give us via the order, usually with a delivery window attached, like a specific dock appointment on their end. So it's not just "shipped this week," it's "shipped in time to hit that appointment," which usually means it needs to leave our dock a day ahead for freight. If we miss it, first thing is a fine — I don't see the number, that's commercial's problem, but I hear about it. Second thing, worse honestly, is they track our on-time percentage and if it drops too far they threaten to delist SKUs. That's happened to a competitor of ours, so it's not an empty threat, and it's why the rule is absolute — we don't even try to be clever about it. + +On the trade-off — honestly, yes, I'd take that trade most of the time, four hours of changeover is real money and crew time, and a distributor slipping two days is usually just an annoyed phone call from our sales rep, not a fine. But "most of the time" is doing a lot of work in that sentence — if it's the same distributor slipping late for the third week running, that's different, they'll start asking for a discount. So it's soft, but it's not infinitely soft. I couldn't put a number on it though — that's genuinely a "sit down with commercial" conversation, nobody's ever made me quantify it. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +That's clear, and I'll record the trade-off as deliberately unquantified rather than invent a weight — I'll flag it as needing commercial, since you've told me exactly where the number would come from. + +Now let's get the structure. Take that Meridian white order from two weeks ago and walk me through it as a sequence — from the moment it lands on your desk to the moment it's off the dock. Keep it to the main steps, five or six; I'll dig into each one after. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Sure, let me walk it through. + +1. **It lands in the demand book** — comes over from ERP on the weekly pull, SKU, quantity, due date, flagged Meridian so it jumps to the top of my attention. +2. **I allocate it to Line 2** — that's not really a decision, Meridian whites always go to Line 2, that's just how it's done here. +3. **It sits in the queue behind whatever's running** — depending what's ahead of it, sometimes I'll reorder things a bit so it doesn't get stuck behind a big changeover. +4. **Changeover if needed, then it runs** — mix, mill, tint or straight through if it's a plain white, then fill and pack. For a white that's usually the more straightforward path. +5. **It goes into QA hold** — every batch does, typically a few hours before it's released. +6. **Once released, it's staged for shipping** — and that's when the truck appointment matters, because if QA's backed up on a Friday afternoon, that's where it actually goes sideways, not on the line. + +That's the whole arc, really — desk to dock. The QA step is the one people don't think about when they're mad at scheduling; half the time a "late" order was actually sitting done in QA hold waiting for the lab to get to it. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +That QA point is exactly the kind of thing that gets left out of a first account — I'll come back to it properly. + +First let me pin down what you're actually scheduling. You said "Meridian white order", "a batch of tint", "same-family white". Three things: + +1. Is the thing you schedule the *order*, or does an order get broken into batches that could run at different times? What's the relationship? + +2. What are the families? You used "same-family white" as if it's a defined grouping — is that a formal thing on the SKU, or your judgment? + +3. And how many lines are there, besides Line 2? + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +1. Mostly the order *is* the batch, if it fits a reasonable run size — a lot of our orders are big enough that we just run the whole thing as one batch. But sometimes I'll split one: if a distributor orders more than makes sense in a single run, or if I need to interleave it with something more urgent, I'll chop it into two batches and run them at different times. So it's order-to-batch most of the time, but not a strict one-to-one — I have the freedom to split if I need to. + +2. The families are real, they're on the SKU — every product's either a base white, a tinted colour, or a specialty clear. That's not my judgment, that's how the SKU's classified in the system, it drives what changeover you need going in and out. "Same-family" just means two SKUs both being whites, or both being tints, so the changeover between them is the cheap quick-rinse kind instead of the expensive family-switch kind. + +3. Three lines total. Line 1's the old workhorse — slower but it's qualified for everything, including specialty. Line 2's the fast one, that's your big-volume runner. Line 3's the newest and quickest, but it's still being qualified product by product, so it can't run everything yet. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Changeover is at the heart of the decision you want to test, so let's do it properly. + +You've named two kinds: the quick rinse between same-family SKUs, and the full washdown on a family switch. For the **quick rinse between two whites on Line 2** — the exact case from two weeks ago: + +1. Typically, how long does it take, start to finish, before the next batch is filling? +2. One time in ten it goes worse than — what? +3. And one time in ten it's better than — what? + +Give me the crew time too if it differs from line downtime. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +For a straight white-to-white rinse on Line 2: + +1. Typically? Call it 25 minutes, start to finish, before the fill head's actually running clean product again. +2. Worse case — one time in ten it drags to maybe 45 minutes, usually because the tech's tied up finishing something on another line first and there's a wait before they even start on Line 2. +3. Better case — one time in ten, if the tech's standing right there and it's a genuinely easy one, 15 minutes and you're rolling again. + +Crew time and line downtime are basically the same thing here — it's quick enough that the tech's on it start to finish, no gap between "crew starts" and "line stops." That's different from the big washdowns, where the line's down way longer than the crew's actually hands-on, because there's soak time and QA checks in between. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +That distinction — line down longer than crew hands-on — matters, so let's get the washdown with both. + +For a **family switch on Line 2**, say white to tint: typically how long is the line down, one time in ten worse than, one time in ten better than? And roughly how much of that is the tech actually hands-on? + +Also: does it depend on direction — is tint-to-white the same as white-to-tint? + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +It absolutely depends on direction — that's the thing people forget. + +**White to tint**, the easier direction: line's down typically about 45 minutes. Worse case, maybe an hour and a bit if the tech gets pulled away partway through. Better case, if everything's staged, maybe half an hour. Of that, the tech's hands-on for most of it — this one doesn't have much soak-and-wait, it's mostly just doing the work. + +**Tint to white** is the ugly one, because any pigment left behind ruins a white batch, so it's a full washdown. Typically about 3 hours, line down the whole time. Worse case — if it doesn't pass the visual check first time and they have to redo part of it — could stretch to 4, maybe a bit more. Better case, a clean fast one, maybe 2 hours if the crew's good and nothing complicates it. Hands-on time for the crew is actually less than the 3 hours suggests — there's real soak and rinse-cycle time where the tech's not standing there, they might duck off to start something on another line. I'd guess they're actually working maybe half of that, the rest is the line just being down waiting on the process. + +So no, it is absolutely not symmetric, and it trips people up if they assume it is. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Good — asymmetric, and I've got both directions. + +Two things to close out changeover: + +1. Specialty clear is the third family — what does going into and out of clear cost, on Line 1 since that's the one qualified for it? Same shape of answer: typical, one-in-ten worse, one-in-ten better, either direction if they differ. + +2. Do the white/tint numbers you just gave me hold on Line 1 and Line 3, or are they line-specific? + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +1. Specialty is roughly the same both directions, unlike white/tint — call it 2 hours typical, either going in or coming out. Worse case, maybe 3 hours if it's coming out of clear and they're being extra careful about residue, since clear can be sneaky — you don't always see it the way you'd see pigment. Better case, maybe an hour and a half if it's a quick swap and the line was already fairly clean. Hands-on for the crew is most of that — specialty doesn't have the long soak cycles the tint-to-white washdown has, it's more just physically thorough cleaning because the product's thick and clingy. + +2. Honestly, I've mostly been quoting you Line 2 numbers because that's where the argument happened. I *think* the same rough shape holds on Line 1 — quick rinse cheap, tint-to-white expensive and slow, white-to-tint quicker — but I couldn't swear the minutes are identical. Line 1's older, the crew sometimes says it's fussier to get properly clean. Line 3 I genuinely don't have a good feel for, because it hasn't run enough different products yet to have built up war stories — it's still mostly running whatever it's been qualified for, which so far is mostly one or two SKUs. So if you need Line 3 numbers, that might be one where you're stuck assuming it's like Line 1 or Line 2 until we've got more history. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +That's the right answer — I'd rather have "I don't know" than invented minutes. Here's what I'd assume unless you tell me otherwise, and I'll mark it as mine, not yours: + +- **Line 1**: same shape as Line 2, with all changeover durations scaled up — say 20% longer — on the strength of the crew's "fussier to get properly clean". +- **Line 3**: same as Line 2 until history exists. + +Both would be checked against the changeover logs, if the techs record start and finish. Does 20% sound like the right order of magnitude for Line 1, or is it more like double? + +Separately — you just said something important in passing. The tech "gets pulled away partway through", "might duck off to start something on another line". How many changeover techs are there across the three lines? + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +20% sounds about right, not double — it's more "takes a bit longer to satisfy the visual check" than "fundamentally slower." Double would be if we were talking about the mill motor issue or something structurally different. So yeah, 20% longer on Line 1 feels like the right order of magnitude, not a multiplier like 2x. + +On the crew — there's two techs on day shift covering all three lines between them. That's it. No dedicated tech per line. So if Line 1 and Line 3 both want a washdown at the same time, one of them waits, and that's the bit that actually causes grief at the huddle — it's not that the changeover itself is unpredictable, it's that the crew's a shared resource and sometimes there's a queue for them before the clock even starts on the line. + +(Sorry — I've just seen the time, I have the floor huddle in ten minutes. How much more do you need?) + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Ten minutes is enough for one thing, so let me tell you where we are and then ask the one that matters most. + +**What I have:** the two objectives, the six-step arc, three lines, three families, all the changeover numbers for Line 2 with spreads, the asymmetry, the two techs as a shared resource. + +**What's still missing** — roughly six or seven things, and two of them are load-bearing for the exact decision you want to test: + +- how long a batch actually *runs* (I have changeovers but no run times at all) +- how the "heads-up another order was about to drop" actually reaches you — that's the trigger your whole hold-the-line decision hangs on +- QA hold as a spread, and whether the lab is a shared resource like the techs +- the order arrival pattern off the ERP weekly pull +- run sizes and what splitting a batch costs +- which SKUs Line 3 is actually qualified for +- what breaks, and how often + +None of that needs to happen now. My question for the remaining minutes, because it's the one I can't guess and it's the one that made you say "grief at the huddle": + +**When both lines want a washdown at once and one tech has to pick — what actually decides it?** Not the rule as posted. Think of the last time it happened: which line got the tech, and what was the reason? + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Honestly, there's no posted rule at all — it's whoever's louder at the huddle, or whoever's about to actually run dry. + +Last time it happened, off the top of my head — Line 1 and Line 3 both wanted a washdown same morning. Line 3 got the tech first, not because it was more important, but because Line 3's changeover was the quick one and Line 1's was going to be the long tint-to-white slog anyway, so the thinking was "knock out the fast one, get that line moving, then commit the tech to the long one." Line 1 sat clean-but-waiting for almost 40 minutes past when it could've started. + +If you push me on the actual logic — it's mostly gut triage: whichever line has the more time-sensitive order behind it wins, and if that's a tie, whichever changeover is faster wins so you get a line moving sooner. Nobody writes this down, it's literally whoever's standing at the huddle table making the case loudest. I've been overruled by the ops director once when he wanted his pet SKU out the door. + +I do need to run — but this was useful, come back to the QA and run-time stuff next time, those are real gaps. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +You've stopped, so I'm not opening anything new. Here's the model as it stands, read back item by item, with the gaps named honestly. The two things you flagged — QA and run times — are the first things on the list when you're back. + +--- + +# 1. The model + +Vocabulary is yours throughout. Each slot shows the value **and** the precision actually obtained. `⚠` marks a slot the model demands and does not yet have. + +## Objectives + +**O1 — "Hold the line versus wash it down now, which one actually costs less over the week"** +- *The question, in your words:* whether letting Line 2 sit idle for ~1 hour waiting on an anticipated same-family white order is cheaper over a week than washing down to the tint batch now. — **spelled out** +- *Depends on:* E1 Order, E2 Batch, E3 Line, E4 Changeover tech, B1 ERP weekly pull, B2 mid-week order drop-in, A4/A5/A6 changeovers, A8 run batch, A9 QA hold, F1 main arc, P1, P3, P5, C2, C4. +- *What "better" means:* changeover hours consumed over the week, subject to O2 holding absolutely. — **named, not quantified against O4** ⚠ + +**O2 — "Meridian shipped on time, full stop, that's non-negotiable"** +- *The question:* does every Meridian order leave the dock in time for its dock appointment. — **spelled out** +- *"On time" =* ship date + delivery window given on the order, resolving to a specific dock appointment their end; must leave our dock **one day ahead** for freight. — **spelled out** +- *Consequence of a miss:* a fine (amount not visible to you — commercial's) and a hit to the tracked on-time percentage; if that drops far enough, threatened SKU delisting — a competitor has been delisted, so it's treated as real. — **spelled out, unquantified** ⚠ +- *Depends on:* A9 QA hold, A10 stage & ship, C4, P1, P2, B3. + +**O3 — Changeover hours** +- *The question:* how many crew-hours go into washdowns rather than filling. "Every hour the crew spends washing down is an hour not filling anything." — **spelled out** +- *Depends on:* A4, A5, A6, A7, E4, C2, P3. + +**O4 — "How ugly the sheet looks" — idle gaps with no good reason** +- *The question:* are lines sitting idle for no good reason. — **spelled out** +- *"Better" =* explicitly a gut check, not a number, "but it's real". — **your words: not quantified** ⚠ (IR-only; see §3) + +**Trade-off between O2, O3 and lateness for non-Meridian:** you would take 4 changeover hours saved against one distributor order two days late "most of the time" — a distributor slip is "an annoyed phone call from our sales rep, not a fine" — but the same distributor slipping three weeks running turns into a discount demand. So: soft, not infinitely soft, **and deliberately unquantified**. Deposit: you named the source — "sit down with commercial". Nobody has ever made you quantify it. ⚠ + +## Entity types + +**E1 — Order (from the demand book)** +- *Distinctions the process treats apart:* Meridian vs. non-Meridian (Meridian "jumps to the top of my attention", on-time absolute); family classification on the SKU. — **spelled out** +- *State riding along:* SKU, quantity, due date + delivery window, Meridian flag, family (base white / tinted colour / specialty clear — a real field in the system, not your judgment). — **spelled out** +- *How many / population shape:* ⚠ not obtained — arrival volume per weekly pull unknown. + +**E2 — Batch** +- *Distinctions:* same three families as the order it came from. — **spelled out** +- *Relationship to order:* "mostly the order *is* the batch, if it fits a reasonable run size"; you may split into two batches run at different times when a distributor orders more than makes sense in one run, or to interleave something more urgent. Not a strict one-to-one; the split is your discretion. — **spelled out** +- *Population shape:* ⚠ run sizes not obtained; cost of a split not obtained. + +**E3 — Line** — a contended resource +- *Distinctions:* **Line 1** — "the old workhorse", slower, qualified for everything including specialty, crew say it's "fussier to get properly clean". **Line 2** — the fast one, big-volume runner. **Line 3** — newest and quickest, still being qualified product by product, "can't run everything yet", so far mostly one or two SKUs. — **spelled out** +- *State riding along:* which family the line is currently dirty with (this is what selects the changeover); qualification set. — **spelled out** +- *How many:* 3. — **number** + +**E4 — Changeover tech** — a contended resource +- *Distinctions:* none stated between the two techs. — **named** +- *State riding along:* which line they're currently committed to; can be "pulled away partway through". — **spelled out** +- *How many:* 2 on day shift, covering all three lines, no dedicated tech per line. — **number** + +**E5 — QA lab** +- *Distinctions / state / population:* ⚠ nothing obtained beyond its existence and that it can be "backed up on a Friday afternoon". Whether it's a shared resource like the techs is an open question you and I both flagged. + +## Boundary conditions + +**B1 — ERP weekly pull into the demand book** +- *Starting state:* orders arrive over from ERP on the weekly pull, carrying SKU, quantity, due date, Meridian flag. — **spelled out** +- *Arrival pattern:* ⚠ **not obtained** — no volume, no spread, no within-week shape. Demanded as a spread. + +**B2 — Mid-week order drop-in ("another same-family white order was about to drop in from a distributor")** +- *Starting state / pattern:* ⚠ **not obtained.** This is the trigger the whole of O1 hangs on and I have only the one anecdote: you had "a heads-up". How that heads-up reaches you, from whom, how far ahead, and how often it turns out to be right are all unknown. Demanded as a spread; currently zero. + +**B3 — Meridian dock appointment** +- *Pattern:* ship date with a delivery window on the order, resolving to a specific dock appointment their end. — **spelled out** +- *Distribution of lead time:* ⚠ not obtained. + +**B4 — Tech availability calendar** +- ⚠ only "two techs on day shift" obtained. Whether there is any night/weekend changeover coverage was never asked. + +**B5 — Line 3 qualification set at start of run** +- ⚠ "mostly one or two SKUs" — **not spelled out**; which SKUs is unknown. + +## Activities + +**A1 — Lands in the demand book** — *needs:* the weekly ERP pull. *Produces:* an Order in the book, Meridian-flagged or not. *Performed by:* ERP / not attended. *Duration:* n/a (instantaneous receipt). **spelled out** + +**A2 — Allocate to a line** — *needs:* an order in the book. *Produces:* order assigned to a line. *Performed by:* you. *Duration:* not a scheduling constraint; "not really a decision" for Meridian whites. **spelled out** (rule in P1) + +**A3 — Reorder the queue** — *needs:* an order sitting behind others. *Produces:* changed run sequence. *Performed by:* you. *Rule:* P4. — **spelled out** + +**A4 — Quick rinse (same family, e.g. white → white) on Line 2** +- *Needs:* line free, previous batch off, a tech available, next SKU same family. *Produces:* line clean for next batch, fill head running clean product. +- *Performed by:* 1 changeover tech. — **named** +- *Duration (line down):* typical **25 min**; one-in-ten worse **45 min** (tech tied up finishing on another line, so a wait before they even start); one-in-ten better **15 min** (tech standing right there, genuinely easy one). — **spread** +- *Crew hands-on:* same as line down — "no gap between crew starts and line stops". — **spelled out** +- *Varies by type?* Family pair, yes (that's what selects A4 vs A5/A6/A7). By line: ⚠ see ledger #1, #2. + +**A5 — Changeover white → tint on Line 2** ("the easier direction") +- *Duration (line down):* typical **45 min**; worse **"an hour and a bit"**; better **~30 min** if everything's staged. — **spread** (see ledger #3 for my numeric reading of "an hour and a bit") +- *Crew hands-on:* "most of it — doesn't have much soak-and-wait, it's mostly just doing the work". — **spelled out qualitatively**, ledger #4 for the fraction +- *Cause of the worse tail:* tech gets pulled away partway through. — **spelled out** + +**A6 — Changeover tint → white on Line 2 — the full washdown** ("the ugly one") +- *Needs:* as A4, plus a passing visual check before release to production. +- *Duration (line down):* typical **~3 h**; worse **4 h, "maybe a bit more"** — when it doesn't pass the visual check first time and they redo part of it; better **~2 h** with a good crew and nothing complicating. — **spread** +- *Crew hands-on:* "maybe half of that" — real soak and rinse-cycle time where the tech isn't standing there and "might duck off to start something on another line". — **spelled out qualitatively**, ledger #4 +- *Rationale:* "any pigment left behind ruins a white batch". — **spelled out** +- **Asymmetry is load-bearing:** white→tint ≠ tint→white, "it trips people up if they assume it is". — **spelled out** + +**A7 — Changeover into / out of specialty clear, on Line 1** +- *Duration (line down):* typical **2 h**, roughly the same both directions "unlike white/tint"; worse **3 h**, especially coming out of clear, "clear can be sneaky — you don't always see it the way you'd see pigment"; better **1.5 h** on a quick swap with the line already fairly clean. — **spread** +- *Crew hands-on:* "most of that" — no long soak cycles; it's physically thorough cleaning because the product's thick and clingy. — **spelled out qualitatively**, ledger #4 + +**A8 — Run the batch** — mix, mill, tint (or straight through if it's a plain white), fill, pack. "For a white that's usually the more straightforward path." +- *Needs:* clean line, batch released to run. *Produces:* filled and packed batch. — **spelled out** +- *Performed by:* ⚠ line operators not elicited. +- *Duration:* ⚠ **nothing obtained.** Demanded as a spread, per family and per line. This is the largest single hole in the model — O1 is a question about a *week*, and without run times there is no week. + +**A9 — QA hold and release** — every batch goes through it. +- *Needs:* packed batch. *Produces:* released batch, or (presumably) something else on failure — ⚠ failure path never asked. +- *Performed by:* the lab. *Duration:* **"typically a few hours"** — an honest figure at the wrong precision; demanded as a spread. ⚠ +- *Known failure mode:* "if QA's backed up on a Friday afternoon, that's where it actually goes sideways, not on the line"; "half the time a 'late' order was actually sitting done in QA hold waiting for the lab to get to it." — **spelled out qualitatively**; the rate and the queueing mechanism are ⚠. + +**A10 — Stage for shipping / ship** — *needs:* QA release. *Produces:* order off the dock. *Timing constraint:* C4. — **spelled out**; duration ⚠. + +**A11 — Tech pulled away mid-changeover** (event, not step) — named by you as the cause of the worse tail on A4 and A5. *Rate:* ⚠ not obtained separately — currently only implicit in the one-in-ten tails. + +**A12 — Washdown fails the visual check, part redone** (event, not step) — named as the cause of the 4 h tail on A6. *Rate:* ⚠ not obtained separately. + +## Ordering / flow + +**F1 — The main arc, desk to dock** — **spelled out**, your six steps: +demand book → allocate to line → queue behind what's running (reorderable) → changeover if needed → run (mix, mill, tint-or-straight-through, fill, pack) → QA hold → release → stage → ship. + +**F2 — Order-to-batch split** — an order may become two batches run at different times. *Decided by:* you, on run size or urgency-interleaving. — **spelled out as a rule**; the *cost* of a split (extra changeovers, extra loss) ⚠ never asked. + +**F3 — Which changeover applies** — selected by (family currently on the line, family of the next batch, line). Same family → A4. White→tint → A5. Tint→white → A6. Into/out of specialty → A7. — **spelled out** + +## Policies + +**P1 — "Meridian whites always go to Line 2, that's just how it's done here"** — *practiced.* Overrides: ⚠ none asked. — **spelled out** + +**P2 — Meridian on-time is absolute** — "we don't even try to be clever about it". *Rationale:* fine, plus tracked on-time % and a delisting threat that has been carried out on a competitor. *Overrides:* none — that's the point. — **spelled out** + +**P3 — Who gets the tech when two lines want one** — *practiced, and there is no prescribed form:* "there's no posted rule at all." +- The rule as practiced: whichever line has the **more time-sensitive order behind it** wins; if that's a tie, **whichever changeover is faster** wins, "so you get a line moving sooner". In the room it resolves as "whoever's louder at the huddle, or whoever's about to actually run dry". +- *Borderline case on record:* Line 1 and Line 3 both wanted a washdown the same morning. Line 3 got the tech first because Line 3's was the quick one and Line 1's was the long tint→white slog anyway — knock out the fast one, get that line moving, then commit the tech to the long one. Line 1 sat clean-but-waiting ~40 minutes past when it could have started. +- *What overrides it:* the ops director, who has overruled you once, wanting "his pet SKU out the door". — **spelled out** +- *Rationale:* two techs, three lines, so "the crew's a shared resource and sometimes there's a queue for them before the clock even starts on the line" — that's the grief at the huddle, not changeover variability. + +**P4 — Reorder the queue so a job doesn't get stuck behind a big changeover** — *practiced, yours.* — **spelled out**; overrides ⚠ not asked. + +**P5 — Hold the line for an anticipated same-family order** — the decision under test. As practiced two weeks ago: on a heads-up that a same-family white was about to drop, let Line 2 sit idle ~1 h rather than wash down to the waiting tint, to save a full washdown. Your own account: "I was guessing." — **spelled out as an instance**; the trigger condition (B2) and the decision threshold are ⚠. + +**P6 — Batch split discretion** — "I have the freedom to split if I need to." — **spelled out** + +## Constraints + +**C1 — Line qualification** — Line 1 qualified for everything including specialty; Line 3 qualified product-by-product, "can't run everything yet"; Line 2 ⚠ never stated. *Consequence when hit:* the batch can't go on that line. — **partially spelled out** ⚠ + +**C2 — Two techs, three lines** — *consequence when hit:* one line waits, clean-but-idle (40 min in the case on record). — **spelled out** + +**C3 — Tint → white requires a full washdown with a passing visual check** — *consequence:* pigment left behind ruins a white batch. — **spelled out** + +**C4 — Meridian must leave our dock a day ahead of the dock appointment** — *consequence:* fine + on-time % + delisting exposure. — **spelled out** + +**C5 — Every batch goes through QA hold before release** — *consequence:* no batch ships unreleased. — **spelled out** + +## Dynamics + +**None.** Nothing you described evolves continuously while nothing discrete happens. Soak time inside A6 is dead time within an activity, not a state variable that crosses a threshold. I am deliberately not inventing one. + +## Data bindings *(named only — these project to nothing today)* + +Changeover logs (tech start/finish per changeover — the check on ledger #1 and #2); ERP demand book (B1 arrival pattern); QA release timestamps (A9); Meridian on-time percentage (O2). — **named** + +## Validation criteria + +⚠ **None obtained.** I never asked how you'd know the model was right. It belongs at the top of the next session, next to run times. + +--- + +# 2. Assumption ledger + +Everything here is mine, not yours. + +| # | Assumption | Why | How to check | +|---|---|---|---| +| 1 | Line 1 changeover durations = Line 2 × 1.2, all types | You said Line 1 is "fussier to get properly clean" and, when I proposed 20%, that it "sounds about right, not double" — but you explicitly could not swear the minutes. The 1.2 factor is mine. | Changeover logs, if techs record start and finish; compare Line 1 vs Line 2 for the same family pair. | +| 2 | Line 3 changeover durations = Line 2 | You said Line 3 has no war stories and "you're stuck assuming it's like Line 1 or Line 2 until we've got more history". Choosing Line 2 rather than Line 1 is mine. | As #1, once Line 3 has run enough different products. | +| 3 | "An hour and a bit" (A5 worse) = 70 min; "4, maybe a bit more" (A6 worse) = 4.5 h | Numeric reading of your words so the spread is usable. | Ask you to confirm or correct the two figures. | +| 4 | Crew hands-on fractions: A4 = 1.0 (yours, stated); A5 = 0.8; A6 = 0.5; A7 = 0.8 | You said "most of it", "maybe half of that", "most of that". A6's 0.5 is close to your words; the two 0.8s are mine. | Changeover logs vs. tech time records; or ask the techs directly. | +| 5 | No changeover happens outside day shift | You said "two techs on day shift covering all three lines". Whether there's any other coverage was never asked. | One question to you. | +| 6 | Every batch's changeover requires exactly one tech (not two) | You always spoke of "the tech" singular. | One question to you. | +| 7 | A6's redo-after-failed-visual-check is inside the 4 h tail rather than a separate event with its own rate | Simplification so the spread stands alone; you described it as the *cause* of the tail. | Ask how often the visual check fails first time. | + +--- + +# 3. What this model leaves out, and what's still unknown + +**Deliberately left out.** +- **Queues and waiting states** are not modelled as things in their own right — the wait behind a running batch, the wait for a tech, the wait in QA hold. They fall out of the activities either side of them. The 40-minute clean-but-waiting on Line 1 is a *result* the model should produce, not an input. +- **The commercial layer** — the fine, the on-time percentage, the delisting mechanism. C4 and O2 encode the hard deadline; the money behind it is out of scope because it's out of your sight. +- **Who ran which changeover** — the two techs are interchangeable, since you drew no distinction between them. + +**Things the model cannot carry, that I'm keeping in words so they aren't lost.** +- **O4, "how ugly the sheet looks."** A real criterion you use, explicitly not a number. It can be approximated as line idle hours, but that approximation is mine, not yours, and I haven't made it. +- **The O2/O3/lateness trade-off weight.** Genuinely unquantified, with the source named: commercial. Without it, the model can report changeover hours and lateness separately but cannot rank two schedules that trade one for the other. +- **The huddle.** "Whoever's louder at the huddle" and the ops director's pet-SKU override are the real P3 in the room. The triage logic you gave me — time-sensitivity first, faster-changeover as tiebreak — is compilable; loudness and the override are not, and any run of this model will be *quieter and more rational* than your plant. That gap is worth remembering when the results look tidy. +- **Ledger #1–#4** are load-bearing for any result involving Line 1 or Line 3. Right now O1 is only genuinely answerable for Line 2. + +**Open slots, in the order I'd close them.** +1. **A8 run duration** — nothing at all, per family and per line, as a spread. O1 asks about a week; run time is most of a week. +2. **B2, the drop-in and the heads-up** — how the warning reaches you, how far ahead, and how often it's right. P5 is the decision under test and its trigger is currently an anecdote. +3. **A9 QA hold** — "a few hours" is a figure at the wrong precision. And whether the lab is a shared resource with a queue, like the techs — because by your own account that's where lateness actually comes from. +4. **B1** — orders per weekly pull, and the within-week shape. +5. **E2 / F2** — typical run sizes, and what a split actually costs in extra changeovers. +6. **B5 / C1** — which SKUs Line 3 is qualified for, and whether Line 2 has restrictions. +7. **Breakage and interruptions** — you mentioned "the mill motor issue" in passing as an example of something structurally different. I never asked what breaks, how often, or for how long. +8. **Validation** — how you'd know the model is right. + +**One caution on the format.** I've built the model; the Petri-net scaffold and the code obligations are derived from it by the tooling, not written by me. I'm not claiming this loads or runs as-is — the run-duration hole alone would stop it. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +*(No dialogue — Marta has left for the huddle. This turn is a silent acknowledgment beat only if the interviewer expects a reply; otherwise nothing further is added.)* + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Nothing further from me — you've stopped, and the read-back above is the deliverable as it stands. + +For when you're back, the first three questions in one place, so you can answer them in five minutes if that's all you have: + +1. **How long does a batch run?** Typical, one-in-ten worse, one-in-ten better — for a plain white on Line 2 first; I'll ask about the other families and lines after. +2. **The heads-up.** Two weeks ago, who told you that white order was about to drop, how far ahead, and how often does that kind of warning turn out to be right? +3. **QA hold.** "A few hours" — typical, one-in-ten worse, one-in-ten better. And is there a queue for the lab like there is for the techs? + +Enjoy the huddle. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +*(Marta has stepped away to the huddle — no further reply expected this turn. The three questions are noted for the next session.)* + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Noted — session closed. The model, the seven-item assumption ledger, and the eight open slots stand as delivered above; the three questions are queued for next time. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Understood — nothing further needed from me here. Session closed, deliverables stand as written, and I'll pick up run times, the heads-up mechanism, and QA hold as the first order of business next time we talk. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Acknowledged. Session closed on your terms. + +For the record, so nothing depends on memory next time: + +- **Delivered:** the model (4 objectives, 5 entity types, 5 boundary conditions, 12 activities, 3 ordering/flow rules, 6 policies, 5 constraints, no dynamics, 4 named data bindings), the 7-entry assumption ledger, and the loss account. +- **Queued, in order:** A8 run duration → B2 the heads-up mechanism → A9 QA hold and whether the lab queues. +- **Standing caveat:** O1 — hold versus wash down — is currently answerable only for Line 2, and only once run times exist. Ledger #1–#4 are the assumptions to attack first if a result involving Line 1 or Line 3 ever looks decisive. + +Thanks for the time, Marta — the changeover asymmetry and the tech-contention story were the two things I'd never have got from a document. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Anytime. Glad the changeover asymmetry landed — that one catches everybody, including people who've been on the floor a lot longer than me. Come find me at the huddle when you're ready to go through run times, I'll have my head in the sheet anyway. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Will do — I'll come to the huddle rather than pull you out of it. If your head's in the sheet anyway, that's the best possible place to ask about run times: I'd rather hear "that one took nine hours and it was a bad one" off the actual sheet than a remembered average. + +One small ask for whenever it's convenient, no work required now: if the changeover logs do have tech start and finish times on them, that's the single thing that would let me retire ledger entries #1 and #4 — the Line 1 scaling factor and the crew hands-on fractions — and swap my guesses for your history. + +See you at the huddle. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Sounds good — I'll flag it to the two techs to make sure they're actually filling in start/finish consistently, because I'll be honest, I've never audited that field myself, I mostly just glance at duration. If it's patchy for Line 1 and Line 3 specifically, that itself would be useful for you to know, not just an inconvenience. See you at the huddle. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +That's a genuinely useful thing to have said, and I'm recording it rather than just noting it — it changes the status of a data binding I'd been leaning on. + +**Amendment to the delivered model:** + +- **Data binding "changeover logs (tech start/finish)"** — provenance qualified: the start/finish field has never been audited; you read duration only. Coverage is unknown and may be patchy, and you've flagged Line 1 and Line 3 as the places to look. Your words: "I've never audited that field myself, I mostly just glance at duration." +- **Consequence for the ledger:** entries #1 (Line 1 × 1.2) and #4 (crew hands-on fractions) each carry a second-order dependency — their check depends on a feed of unverified coverage. If the field turns out patchy exactly where the assumptions bite, those two stay assumptions and the honest move is to widen them rather than to fill them in. +- **Recorded as a finding in its own right:** patchy logging on Line 1 and Line 3 is itself evidence about the plant, not just an obstacle to the model. + +Nothing else changes. See you at the huddle. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Fair enough — that's a better way to put it than I would have. Talk soon. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Talk soon, Marta. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +See you at the huddle. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +See you there. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +*(end of session — nothing further to add.)* + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Session ended. Deliverables stand as written above. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Confirmed — nothing further from this end. Session closed. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Closed. Nothing further. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Closed. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Closed. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +I really do have to stop here. Please produce the model now with everything you have. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +# Coatings Plant Scheduling Model +**Elicited from:** Marta, master scheduler +**Job:** construct (no prior model) +**Status at close:** floor satisfied; O1's dependency slice **incomplete** — see §3. +**Vocabulary:** the expert's throughout. `⚠` = a slot the method demands and the interview did not obtain. + +--- + +## 1. The model + +### 1.1 Objectives + +**O1 — "Hold the line versus wash it down now, which one actually costs less over the week"** +- **The question, in her words** *(spelled out)*: whether letting Line 2 sit idle for about an hour, on a heads-up that another same-family white order is about to drop in from a distributor, is cheaper over a week than washing down now to run the tint batch waiting behind it. Origin: a real Thursday-afternoon decision two weeks before the interview. Her own verdict on how she made it: *"I was guessing."* +- **Depends on** *(≥1 satisfied)*: E1, E2, E3, E4, B1, B2, A4, A5, A6, A8, A9, F1, F2, P3, P4, P5, C1, C2, C3. +- **What "better" means** *(named; not quantified)*: changeover hours consumed over the week, subject to O2 holding absolutely. ⚠ no trade-off weight against lateness — see the trade-off note below. +- **Source-regime**: practiced. + +**O2 — "Whether Meridian shipped on time, full stop, that's non-negotiable"** +- **The question** *(spelled out)*: does every Meridian order leave the dock in time for its dock appointment. +- **"On time" defined** *(spelled out)*: a ship date given on the order, usually with a delivery window attached — a specific dock appointment at Meridian's end. In practice the batch must leave our dock **one day ahead** to allow for freight. Not "shipped this week." +- **Consequence of a miss** *(spelled out, unquantified)*: a fine — *"I don't see the number, that's commercial's problem, but I hear about it"* — and, worse, Meridian tracks our on-time percentage and threatens to delist SKUs if it drops too far. A competitor has been delisted, *"so it's not an empty threat, and it's why the rule is absolute — we don't even try to be clever about it."* ⚠ fine amount and delisting threshold both outside her sight. +- **Depends on**: A8, A9, A10, B3, C4, C5, P1, P2. +- **Source-regime**: prescribed and practiced coincide — she reports no divergence, which is itself the finding. + +**O3 — Changeover hours** +- **The question** *(spelled out)*: how many crew-hours go into washing down rather than filling. *"Every hour the crew spends washing down is an hour not filling anything."* +- **Depends on**: A4, A5, A6, A7, E4, C2, P3. +- **What "better" means** *(named)*: fewer changeover hours. Directionally clear, no target value. ⚠ + +**O4 — "How ugly the sheet looks"** +- **The question** *(spelled out)*: *"are there gaps where a line's sitting idle for no good reason."* +- **What "better" means** *(her words; explicitly not a number)*: *"that last one's not a number, it's more a gut check, but it's real."* +- **Depends on**: E3, C2, P3, P4, A4–A7. +- **Status**: recorded, IR-only. Approximating it as line idle hours would be my move, not hers; I have not made it. See §3. + +**The trade-off between O2, O3 and non-Meridian lateness** *(spelled out as a rule; deliberately unquantified)* +Four changeover hours saved against one distributor order two days late: *"honestly, yes, I'd take that trade most of the time"* — a distributor slip is *"usually just an annoyed phone call from our sales rep, not a fine."* But *"'most of the time' is doing a lot of work in that sentence"*: the same distributor slipping three weeks running starts asking for a discount. So lateness for non-Meridian is soft but not infinitely soft, and the softness decays with repetition on the same customer. +**Deposit for the missing number**: *"that's genuinely a 'sit down with commercial' conversation, nobody's ever made me quantify it."* Source named; not obtainable from the scheduler. ⚠ + +--- + +### 1.2 Entity types + +**E1 — Order (in the demand book)** +- **Distinctions the process treats apart** *(spelled out)*: Meridian vs. non-Meridian — a Meridian flag arrives on the order and it *"jumps to the top of my attention"*; family classification (see below), which drives allocation and changeover. +- **State riding along** *(spelled out)*: SKU; quantity; due date with delivery window; Meridian flag; family — **base white / tinted colour / specialty clear**. The family is a real field: *"that's not my judgment, that's how the SKU's classified in the system, it drives what changeover you need going in and out."* +- **How many / population shape**: ⚠ not obtained. Orders per weekly pull and within-week shape unknown. + +**E2 — Batch** +- **Distinctions** *(spelled out)*: inherits the family of the order it came from. +- **Relationship to E1** *(spelled out)*: *"mostly the order is the batch, if it fits a reasonable run size."* Split into two batches run at different times when a distributor orders more than makes sense in a single run, or to interleave something more urgent. *"Order-to-batch most of the time, but not a strict one-to-one — I have the freedom to split if I need to."* +- **How many / population shape**: ⚠ not obtained. Run sizes, "reasonable run size" threshold, and the cost of a split all unelicited. + +**E3 — Line** *(a contended resource: capacity in C1, contention in P1/P3, availability in B4)* +- **Distinctions** *(spelled out)*: + - **Line 1** — *"the old workhorse — slower but it's qualified for everything, including specialty."* Crew report it is *"fussier to get properly clean."* + - **Line 2** — *"the fast one, that's your big-volume runner."* Meridian whites always go here (P1). + - **Line 3** — *"the newest and quickest, but it's still being qualified product by product, so it can't run everything yet"*; so far *"mostly one or two SKUs."* +- **State riding along** *(spelled out)*: the family the line is currently dirty with — this selects which changeover applies (F3); the line's qualification set. +- **How many** *(number)*: 3. + +**E4 — Changeover tech** *(a contended resource)* +- **Distinctions** *(named)*: none drawn between the two techs; treated as interchangeable. +- **State riding along** *(spelled out)*: which line they are currently committed to. Can be *"pulled away partway through"* a changeover, and during long soaks *"might duck off to start something on another line."* +- **How many** *(number)*: 2 on day shift, covering all three lines. *"That's it. No dedicated tech per line."* + +**E5 — QA lab** +- ⚠ **Nothing obtained** beyond its existence, that every batch passes through it, and that it *"gets backed up on a Friday afternoon."* Whether it is a contended resource with a queue — as she suspects and I flagged — is open. +- Recorded because her own diagnosis makes it load-bearing for O2: *"half the time a 'late' order was actually sitting done in QA hold waiting for the lab to get to it."* + +--- + +### 1.3 Boundary conditions + +**B1 — ERP weekly pull into the demand book** +- **Starting state** *(spelled out)*: orders come over from ERP on the weekly pull carrying SKU, quantity, due date, Meridian flag. +- **Arrival pattern**: ⚠ **not obtained** (demanded as a spread). No volume, no variability, no within-week shape. + +**B2 — Mid-week drop-in order, and the heads-up that precedes it** +- ⚠ **Not obtained** (demanded as a spread). All that exists is the single anecdote: *"I had a heads-up another same-family white order was about to drop in from a distributor."* +- **Why this matters more than its size suggests**: this is the trigger on which O1's entire decision hangs. Who gives the heads-up, how far ahead, and how often it proves right are all unknown. Without it, P5 can be simulated as a *rule* but its *arrival process* has no basis. + +**B3 — Meridian dock appointment** +- **Pattern** *(spelled out, qualitative)*: a ship date with a delivery window on the order, resolving to a specific dock appointment at Meridian's end. +- **Lead-time distribution**: ⚠ not obtained. + +**B4 — Tech availability** +- **Spelled out, partially**: two techs on **day shift**. ⚠ Whether any changeover coverage exists outside day shift was never asked (ledger #5). + +**B5 — Line 3 qualification set** +- ⚠ *"mostly one or two SKUs"* — **not spelled out**; which SKUs, unknown. + +--- + +### 1.4 Activities + +**A1 — Lands in the demand book** +- *Needs*: the weekly ERP pull. *Produces*: an order in the demand book, Meridian-flagged or not. *Performed by*: ERP — unattended. *Duration*: instantaneous receipt. *Rate*: per B1 ⚠. *Mode-change loss*: n/a. *Varies by type*: no. **spelled out** + +**A2 — Allocate to a line** +- *Needs*: an order in the book. *Produces*: order assigned to a line. *Performed by*: Marta. *Duration*: not a constraint on the schedule; for Meridian whites *"that's not really a decision."* *Rule*: P1. **spelled out** + +**A3 — Reorder the queue** +- *Needs*: an order sitting behind others on a line. *Produces*: a changed run sequence. *Performed by*: Marta. *Rule*: P4 — *"sometimes I'll reorder things a bit so it doesn't get stuck behind a big changeover."* **spelled out** + +**A4 — Quick rinse, same family (white → white), Line 2** +- *Needs*: previous batch off; a tech available; next SKU in the same family. *Produces*: line clean, *"the fill head's actually running clean product again."* +- *Performed by* **(named)**: one changeover tech. +- *Duration, line down* **(spread)**: **typical 25 min**; **one-in-ten worse 45 min** — *"usually because the tech's tied up finishing something on another line first and there's a wait before they even start on Line 2"*; **one-in-ten better 15 min** — *"if the tech's standing right there and it's a genuinely easy one."* +- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out)**: identical to line-down. *"It's quick enough that the tech's on it start to finish, no gap between 'crew starts' and 'line stops.'"* +- *Mode-change loss*: this activity **is** the mode change; the loss is the duration above. +- *Varies by type* **(named)**: yes by family-pair (F3 selects between A4–A7). By line: ⚠ ledger #1, #2. + +**A5 — Family switch, white → tint, Line 2** — *"the easier direction"* +- *Needs / produces*: as A4, next batch in a different family. +- *Performed by* **(named)**: one changeover tech. +- *Duration, line down* **(spread)**: **typical 45 min**; **worse "an hour and a bit"** — *"if the tech gets pulled away partway through"*; **better ~30 min** — *"if everything's staged."* (Numeric reading of "an hour and a bit": ledger #3.) +- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative)**: *"the tech's hands-on for most of it — this one doesn't have much soak-and-wait, it's mostly just doing the work."* Fraction: ledger #4. +- *Varies by type*: direction-dependent — see A6. + +**A6 — Family switch, tint → white, Line 2 — the full washdown** — *"the ugly one"* +- *Needs*: as A5, plus a **passing visual check** before the line is released back to production. +- *Produces*: a line clean enough to run white. +- *Performed by* **(named)**: one changeover tech, not continuously present. +- *Duration, line down* **(spread)**: **typical ~3 h**; **worse 4 h, "maybe a bit more"** — *"if it doesn't pass the visual check first time and they have to redo part of it"*; **better ~2 h** — *"a clean fast one, if the crew's good and nothing complicates it."* (Ledger #3 for the numeric reading of the tail.) +- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative)**: *"less than the 3 hours suggests — there's real soak and rinse-cycle time where the tech's not standing there, they might duck off to start something on another line. I'd guess they're actually working maybe half of that."* Note her own hedge — *"I'd guess"* — carried into ledger #4. +- *Rationale* **(spelled out)**: *"any pigment left behind ruins a white batch, so it's a full washdown."* +- **Asymmetry is load-bearing**: white→tint ≠ tint→white. *"It absolutely depends on direction — that's the thing people forget… it is absolutely not symmetric, and it trips people up if they assume it is."* + +**A7 — Changeover into / out of specialty clear, Line 1** +- *Needs / produces*: as A5/A6, for the specialty family. Only Line 1 is qualified (C1). +- *Performed by* **(named)**: one changeover tech. +- *Duration, line down* **(spread)**: **typical 2 h**, *"roughly the same both directions, unlike white/tint"*; **worse 3 h**, *"if it's coming out of clear and they're being extra careful about residue, since clear can be sneaky — you don't always see it the way you'd see pigment"*; **better 1.5 h**, *"a quick swap and the line was already fairly clean."* +- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative)**: *"most of that — specialty doesn't have the long soak cycles the tint-to-white washdown has, it's more just physically thorough cleaning because the product's thick and clingy."* Fraction: ledger #4. + +**A8 — Run the batch** — mix, mill, tint (or *"straight through if it's a plain white"*), fill, pack +- *Needs* **(spelled out)**: a clean line in the right family state; the batch released to run. +- *Produces* **(spelled out)**: a filled and packed batch. +- *Performed by*: ⚠ line operators never elicited as a resource. +- **Duration**: ⚠ **nothing obtained.** Demanded as a spread, per family and per line. +- *Varies by type*: partially — *"for a white that's usually the more straightforward path"* (skips the tint step), but no durations attach to that. +- **This is the largest hole in the model.** O1 asks a question about a week; run time is most of a week. + +**A9 — QA hold and release** — *"every batch does"* +- *Needs*: a packed batch. *Produces*: a released batch. +- *Performed by* **(named)**: the lab (E5). +- **Duration**: *"typically a few hours before it's released"* — an honest **number at the wrong precision**; demanded as a **spread**. ⚠ +- *Failure path*: ⚠ never asked what happens to a batch that fails QA. +- *Known pathology* **(spelled out, qualitative; rate ⚠)**: *"if QA's backed up on a Friday afternoon, that's where it actually goes sideways, not on the line."* And: *"the QA step is the one people don't think about when they're mad at scheduling; half the time a 'late' order was actually sitting done in QA hold waiting for the lab to get to it."* + +**A10 — Stage for shipping, and ship** +- *Needs*: QA release. *Produces*: the order off the dock. *Timing constraint*: C4 — *"that's when the truck appointment matters."* +- *Duration*: ⚠ not obtained. + +**A11 — Tech pulled away mid-changeover** *(event, not step)* +- Named by her as the mechanism behind the worse tail of A4 (*"the tech's tied up finishing something on another line"*) and A5 (*"if the tech gets pulled away partway through"*). +- *Rate*: ⚠ not obtained separately; currently only implicit inside the one-in-ten tails of A4 and A5. Per P01 this should be its own rate and duration. + +**A12 — Washdown fails the visual check, part redone** *(event, not step)* +- Named as the mechanism behind A6's 4 h tail. +- *Rate*: ⚠ not obtained separately. Ledger #7 records the simplification. + +**A13 — "The mill motor issue"** *(event, not step — named in passing, nothing more)* +- Mentioned only as an example of what a *structural* difference between lines would look like, in contrast to Line 1 merely being fussier. Recorded so it is not lost; **rate ⚠, duration ⚠, consequence ⚠**. This is the whole of the breakdown/interruption stratum, which was never swept. + +--- + +### 1.5 Ordering / flow + +**F1 — The main arc, desk to dock** *(spelled out — her six steps, verbatim in structure)* +1. Lands in the demand book (ERP weekly pull; SKU, quantity, due date, Meridian flag). +2. Allocated to a line (*"Meridian whites always go to Line 2"*). +3. Sits in the queue behind whatever's running — reorderable (A3/P4). +4. Changeover if needed (F3 selects which), then it runs: mix, mill, tint-or-straight-through, fill, pack. +5. QA hold. +6. Released, staged for shipping, out against the truck appointment. + +**F2 — Order-to-batch split** +- *Order* **(spelled out)**: an order becomes one batch by default; it may become two batches run at different times. +- *How the branch is decided* **(spelled out)**: Marta's judgment, on either (a) a distributor ordering *"more than makes sense in a single run"*, or (b) needing to interleave something more urgent. +- *Cost of a split*: ⚠ never asked (P03 unresolved) — extra changeovers and any extra loss are unknown. + +**F3 — Which changeover applies** *(spelled out)* +Selected by the triple (family currently on the line, family of the next batch, line): +- same family → **A4** quick rinse +- white → tint → **A5** +- tint → white → **A6** full washdown +- into or out of specialty clear → **A7** (Line 1 only) + +--- + +### 1.6 Policies + +**P1 — "Meridian whites always go to Line 2, that's just how it's done here"** +- *As practiced* **(spelled out)**: fixed allocation, not a decision. +- *What overrides it*: ⚠ never asked. +- *Source-regime*: practiced; no prescribed form offered. + +**P2 — Meridian on-time is absolute** +- *As practiced* **(spelled out)**: *"the rule is absolute — we don't even try to be clever about it."* +- *What overrides it* **(spelled out)**: nothing. That is the content of the policy. +- *Rationale*: fine, tracked on-time percentage, delisting threat carried out on a competitor. + +**P3 — Who gets the tech when two lines want one** *(the model's richest policy, and the least documented)* +- **Prescribed form: none exists.** *"There's no posted rule at all."* +- **As practiced** *(spelled out)*: in the room it resolves as *"whoever's louder at the huddle, or whoever's about to actually run dry."* Pressed for the underlying logic: *"it's mostly gut triage: whichever line has the more time-sensitive order behind it wins, and if that's a tie, whichever changeover is faster wins so you get a line moving sooner."* +- **Borderline case on record** *(the practiced rule demonstrated, per P05)*: Line 1 and Line 3 both wanted a washdown the same morning. **Line 3 got the tech first** — *"not because it was more important, but because Line 3's changeover was the quick one and Line 1's was going to be the long tint-to-white slog anyway, so the thinking was 'knock out the fast one, get that line moving, then commit the tech to the long one.'"* Line 1 sat **clean-but-waiting for almost 40 minutes** past when it could have started. +- **What overrides it** *(spelled out)*: the ops director. *"I've been overruled by the ops director once when he wanted his pet SKU out the door."* +- *Rationale* **(spelled out)**: *"the crew's a shared resource and sometimes there's a queue for them before the clock even starts on the line"* — and this, not changeover variability, is *"the bit that actually causes grief at the huddle."* + +**P4 — Reorder the queue so a job isn't stuck behind a big changeover** +- *As practiced* **(spelled out)**: Marta reorders *"a bit"* to avoid a job landing behind an expensive changeover. +- *What overrides it*: ⚠ never asked. + +**P5 — Hold the line for an anticipated same-family order** *(the decision under test)* +- *As practiced, one instance* **(spelled out)**: on a heads-up that a same-family white was about to drop, let Line 2 sit idle for *"maybe an hour"* rather than wash down for the tint waiting behind, *"because doing them back to back would save us a full washdown."* +- *Her own epistemic status*: *"I was guessing."* Her boss's challenge — *"are you sure that's worth it, or are you just guessing?"* — is the reason this model exists. +- *Trigger condition and decision threshold*: ⚠ how strong a heads-up, and how long she'd hold, are not generalised beyond this instance. Depends on B2. + +**P6 — Batch-split discretion** +- *As practiced* **(spelled out)**: *"I have the freedom to split if I need to."* Criteria as in F2. +- *What overrides it*: ⚠ never asked. + +--- + +### 1.7 Constraints + +**C1 — Line qualification** +- *The limit* **(partially spelled out)**: Line 1 qualified for everything including specialty. Line 3 qualified product-by-product, *"can't run everything yet"*, currently *"mostly one or two SKUs"* — which ones ⚠. Line 2's qualification set ⚠ never stated. +- *What happens when it's hit* **(spelled out)**: the batch cannot go on that line. + +**C2 — Two techs, three lines** +- *The limit* **(spelled out)**: 2 techs on day shift for 3 lines. +- *What happens when it's hit* **(spelled out)**: *"if Line 1 and Line 3 both want a washdown at the same time, one of them waits"* — clean-but-idle; 40 minutes in the case on record. Resolution by P3. + +**C3 — Tint → white requires a full washdown passing a visual check** +- *The limit* **(spelled out)**: a white batch may not run on a line still carrying pigment. +- *What happens when it's hit* **(spelled out)**: *"any pigment left behind ruins a white batch"*; a failed visual check means part of the washdown is redone (A12). + +**C4 — Meridian must leave our dock a day ahead of the appointment** +- *The limit* **(spelled out)**: shipped in time to hit the dock appointment, which *"usually means it needs to leave our dock a day ahead for freight."* +- *What happens when it's hit* **(spelled out)**: fine + on-time percentage damage + delisting exposure. + +**C5 — Every batch passes QA hold before release** +- *The limit* **(spelled out)**: *"every batch does."* +- *What happens when it's hit* **(spelled out)**: nothing ships unreleased; the batch waits in hold. + +**Unwritten constraints**: ⚠ the closing sweep — *"what would a newcomer get wrong in the first week?"*, *"which rule exists because something once went wrong?"* — was never run. The one item that surfaced unprompted is the changeover asymmetry: *"that one catches everybody, including people who've been on the floor a lot longer than me."* + +--- + +### 1.8 Dynamics + +**None.** Nothing described evolves continuously while nothing discrete happens. The soak and rinse-cycle time inside A6 is dead time *within* an activity, not a state variable crossing a threshold, and I have deliberately not promoted it to one. + +--- + +### 1.9 Data bindings *(named only; these project to nothing today)* + +| Feed | Would drive | Provenance | +|---|---|---| +| Changeover logs — tech start/finish per changeover | A4–A7 durations and crew hands-on fractions; retires ledger #1 and #4 | **Qualified**: *"I've never audited that field myself, I mostly just glance at duration."* Coverage unknown, possibly patchy — Marta named **Line 1 and Line 3** as where to look. She will flag it to the two techs. | +| ERP demand book | B1 arrival pattern, B2 | not discussed | +| QA release timestamps | A9 duration and lab queueing | not discussed | +| Meridian on-time percentage | O2 | tracked by Meridian, visible to commercial | + +**Finding, recorded in its own right**: patchy changeover logging concentrated on Lines 1 and 3 is evidence about the plant, not merely an obstacle to the model. Her words: *"if it's patchy for Line 1 and Line 3 specifically, that itself would be useful for you to know, not just an inconvenience."* + +--- + +### 1.10 Validation criteria + +⚠ **None obtained.** How Marta would know the model is right was never asked. Queued. + +--- + +## 2. Assumption ledger + +Everything here is mine. None of it is hers. + +| # | Assumption | Why it was made | How to check it | +|---|---|---|---| +| **1** | Line 1 changeover durations = Line 2 × **1.2**, all four types | She could not give Line 1 minutes: *"I couldn't swear the minutes are identical… Line 1's older, the crew sometimes says it's fussier."* I proposed 20%; she said *"20% sounds about right, not double."* **The 1.2 factor originated with me** — her assent is not authorship. | Changeover logs, Line 1 vs Line 2, same family-pair. **Blocked by the unaudited start/finish field, and Line 1 is one of the two lines she expects to be patchy.** | +| **2** | Line 3 changeover durations = Line 2, unscaled | *"Line 3 I genuinely don't have a good feel for… you're stuck assuming it's like Line 1 or Line 2 until we've got more history."* She offered the disjunction; **choosing Line 2 was mine.** | As #1, once Line 3 has run more products. Also expected patchy. | +| **3** | "An hour and a bit" (A5 worse) = **70 min**; "4, maybe a bit more" (A6 worse) = **4.5 h** | Numeric readings so the spreads are usable. | One question to Marta: confirm or correct both. | +| **4** | Crew hands-on fractions: A4 = **1.0**; A5 = **0.8**; A6 = **0.5**; A7 = **0.8** | A4's 1.0 is hers, stated. A6's 0.5 is close to *"maybe half of that"* — but note her own hedge, *"I'd guess."* **The two 0.8s from *"most of it"* / *"most of that"* are mine.** | Changeover logs vs. tech time records, or ask the two techs directly. Same blocker as #1. | +| **5** | No changeover happens outside day shift | She said *"two techs on **day shift** covering all three lines."* Whether any other coverage exists was never asked. | One question to Marta. | +| **6** | A changeover requires exactly **one** tech, not two | She spoke of *"the tech"* singular throughout, including for the 3-hour washdown. | One question to Marta or the techs. | +| **7** | A12 (failed visual check, part redone) is folded **inside** A6's 4 h tail rather than modelled as a separate event with its own rate and duration | She described it as *the cause of* the tail, not as an independent event. Keeps the spread self-contained. Contrary to P01, which would separate rate from duration. | Ask how often the visual check fails first time; if it's common, split it out. | +| **8** | The two changeover techs are **interchangeable** | She drew no distinction between them. | One question to Marta. | + +**Second-order note on #1 and #4**: their stated check depends on a feed of unverified coverage, concentrated exactly where the assumptions bite. If the field proves patchy on Line 1, the honest move is to **widen** these assumptions, not to fill them in. + +--- + +## 3. What the model leaves out, what is unknown, and why + +### 3.1 Deliberately left out + +- **Queues, buffers and waiting states are not nodes.** The wait behind a running batch, the wait for a tech, the wait in QA hold — none is elicited as a thing in itself; each is implied by the activities either side and emerges in projection. The 40-minute clean-but-waiting on Line 1 is an *output* the model should reproduce, not an input to it. +- **The commercial layer.** The fine, the on-time percentage mechanics, the delisting threshold. C4 and O2 encode the hard deadline; the money behind it is outside the scheduler's sight and she named commercial as the owner. +- **Individual tech identity.** Ledger #8 — she drew no distinction. +- **Scenarios.** Not elicited; they assemble from B1–B5 at simulation time. + +### 3.2 What the formalism cannot carry, kept in words so it is not lost + +- **O4, "how ugly the sheet looks."** A criterion she genuinely uses and explicitly refuses to number. It could be approximated as line idle hours — but that approximation would be mine, and I have not made it. +- **The O2/O3/lateness trade-off weight.** Deliberately unquantified with the source named (commercial). Consequence: the model can report changeover hours, Meridian lateness and distributor lateness **separately**, but cannot rank two schedules that trade one against another. That is a real limit on answering O1, since O1's "costs less" implicitly spans them. +- **The decay of softness.** *"The same distributor slipping late for the third week running"* turning into a discount demand is a memory effect across weeks on a customer. Stated as a rule, unquantified, and not represented. +- **The huddle.** *"Whoever's louder at the huddle"* and the ops director's pet-SKU override are the real P3 in the room. The triage logic — time-sensitivity first, faster-changeover as tiebreak — is compilable; loudness and the override are not. **Any run of this model will be quieter and more rational than the plant.** That is worth remembering when a result looks tidy. + +### 3.3 Open slots, in the order I would close them + +1. **A8 run duration** — nothing at all, per family and per line, as a spread. O1 is a question about a *week*; run time is most of a week. **Nothing about O1 is answerable until this exists.** +2. **B2, the drop-in and the heads-up** — who tells her, how far ahead, how often it proves right. P5 is the decision under test and its trigger is currently a single anecdote. +3. **A9 QA hold** — *"a few hours"* is honest at the wrong precision; and whether the lab queues like the techs do. By her own account this is where lateness actually comes from, so it bears directly on O2. +4. **B1** — orders per weekly pull and the within-week shape. +5. **E2 / F2** — typical run sizes, the "reasonable run size" threshold, and what a split costs in extra changeovers (P03). +6. **C1 / B5** — which SKUs Line 3 is qualified for; whether Line 2 has restrictions. +7. **Breakdowns and interruptions** — the whole stratum. A13 "the mill motor issue" is a name with no rate, duration or consequence. A11 and A12 need rate separated from duration (P01). +8. **The unwritten-constraint sweep** and **validation criteria** — neither was run. + +### 3.4 Status against the completion criteria + +- **Static floor: satisfied** — 4 objectives, 5 entity types, 13 activities, 3 ordering/flow nodes. +- **O2, O3: dependency slices substantially satisfied**, excepting A8 and A9 durations. +- **O1: dependency slice incomplete.** A8 has no duration at all; B2 has no arrival pattern. O1 is currently **answerable only for Line 2**, and only once run times exist. Ledger #1–#4 are the first assumptions to attack if any result involving Line 1 or Line 3 ever looks decisive. +- **O4: recorded, unsupported for quantitative use** by its own author's description. + +### 3.5 What I do not claim + +I have elicited a model, not built a net. The SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar and the typed loss report are derived from this model by the tooling's projection — I have not written them and I am not claiming this loads, compiles, or runs. The A8 hole alone would stop it. + +--- + +*Elicited from Marta, master scheduler, in a single session ended at her stop. Three questions queued for resumption: run duration for a plain white on Line 2 (typical / one-in-ten worse / one-in-ten better); the heads-up mechanism behind B2; QA hold as a spread, and whether the lab queues.* + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +I really do have to stop here. Please produce the model now with everything you have. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +# Coatings Plant Scheduling Model — final deliverable + +**Elicited from:** Marta, master scheduler +**Job:** construct (no prior model existed) +**Ended:** at the expert's stop. No new topics opened after it. +**Status:** static floor satisfied; O2 and O3 near-complete; **O1's dependency slice incomplete** (see §4). +**Convention:** every value is in Marta's vocabulary, with the precision actually obtained. `⚠` marks a slot the method demands and the interview did not get. Quoted text is hers. + +--- + +## 1. The model + +### 1.1 Objectives + +**O1 — "Hold the line versus wash it down now, which one actually costs less over the week"** +- *Question* **(spelled out)** — whether letting Line 2 sit idle about an hour, on a heads-up that another same-family white order is about to drop from a distributor, beats washing down now for the tint waiting behind. From a real Thursday two weeks before the interview. Her verdict on her own method: *"I was guessing."* +- *Depends on* — E1, E2, E3, E4, B1, B2, A4, A5, A6, A8, A9, F1, F2, F3, P3, P4, P5, C1, C2, C3. +- *"Better"* **(named, not quantified)** — changeover hours over the week, subject to O2 holding absolutely. ⚠ no weight against lateness. +- *Source-regime* — practiced. + +**O2 — "Whether Meridian shipped on time, full stop, that's non-negotiable"** +- *Question* **(spelled out)** — does every Meridian order leave the dock in time for its appointment. +- *"On time"* **(spelled out)** — a ship date on the order with a delivery window, resolving to a specific dock appointment at Meridian's end; in practice must leave our dock **one day ahead** for freight. *"Not just 'shipped this week.'"* +- *Consequence of a miss* **(spelled out; unquantified ⚠)** — a fine, *"I don't see the number, that's commercial's problem, but I hear about it"*; and worse, a tracked on-time percentage with a delisting threat — *"that's happened to a competitor of ours, so it's not an empty threat, and it's why the rule is absolute."* +- *Depends on* — A8, A9, A10, B3, C4, C5, P1, P2. + +**O3 — Changeover hours** +- *Question* **(spelled out)** — crew-hours spent washing down instead of filling: *"every hour the crew spends washing down is an hour not filling anything."* +- *Depends on* — A4, A5, A6, A7, E4, C2, P3. +- *"Better"* **(named)** — fewer. Direction only; no target. ⚠ + +**O4 — "How ugly the sheet looks"** +- *Question* **(spelled out)** — *"are there gaps where a line's sitting idle for no good reason."* +- *"Better"* **(her words; explicitly not a number)** — *"that last one's not a number, it's more a gut check, but it's real."* +- *Depends on* — E3, C2, P3, P4, A4–A7. IR-only; see §3. + +**Trade-off among O2 / O3 / non-Meridian lateness** **(spelled out as a rule; deliberately unquantified ⚠)** — four changeover hours against one distributor order two days late: *"honestly, yes, I'd take that trade most of the time"*, a slip being *"an annoyed phone call from our sales rep, not a fine."* But *"'most of the time' is doing a lot of work in that sentence"* — the same distributor slipping three weeks running *"start[s] asking for a discount."* Soft, not infinitely soft, decaying with repetition on one customer. **Deposit:** *"that's genuinely a 'sit down with commercial' conversation, nobody's ever made me quantify it."* + +--- + +### 1.2 Entity types + +**E1 — Order (in the demand book)** +- *Distinctions* **(spelled out)** — Meridian vs non-Meridian (flagged on the order; it *"jumps to the top of my attention"*); family, which drives allocation and changeover. +- *State riding along* **(spelled out)** — SKU, quantity, due date + delivery window, Meridian flag, family: **base white / tinted colour / specialty clear**. *"That's not my judgment, that's how the SKU's classified in the system, it drives what changeover you need going in and out."* +- *Population* — ⚠ not obtained. + +**E2 — Batch** +- *Distinctions* **(spelled out)** — inherits its order's family. +- *Relation to E1* **(spelled out)** — *"mostly the order is the batch, if it fits a reasonable run size"*; split into two batches at different times when a distributor orders *"more than makes sense in a single run"* or to interleave something urgent. *"Not a strict one-to-one — I have the freedom to split if I need to."* +- *Population* — ⚠ run sizes, split cost not obtained. + +**E3 — Line** *(contended resource)* +- *Distinctions* **(spelled out)** — **Line 1**: *"the old workhorse — slower but it's qualified for everything, including specialty"*; crew say it's *"fussier to get properly clean."* **Line 2**: *"the fast one, that's your big-volume runner."* **Line 3**: *"the newest and quickest, but it's still being qualified product by product, so it can't run everything yet"* — so far *"mostly one or two SKUs."* +- *State riding along* **(spelled out)** — the family the line is currently dirty with (selects the changeover, F3); its qualification set. +- *How many* **(number)** — 3. + +**E4 — Changeover tech** *(contended resource)* +- *Distinctions* **(named)** — none drawn; treated as interchangeable (ledger #8). +- *State riding along* **(spelled out)** — which line they're committed to; can be *"pulled away partway through"*, and on long soaks *"might duck off to start something on another line."* +- *How many* **(number)** — 2 on day shift for all three lines. *"That's it. No dedicated tech per line."* + +**E5 — QA lab** +- ⚠ nothing obtained but its existence, that every batch passes through, and that it *"gets backed up on a Friday afternoon."* Whether it queues like the techs is open — and load-bearing for O2 by her own diagnosis: *"half the time a 'late' order was actually sitting done in QA hold waiting for the lab to get to it."* + +--- + +### 1.3 Boundary conditions + +**B1 — ERP weekly pull** — *starting state* **(spelled out)**: orders come from ERP on the weekly pull with SKU, quantity, due date, Meridian flag. *Arrival pattern* — ⚠ **not obtained** (demanded: spread). + +**B2 — Mid-week drop-in order and the heads-up before it** — ⚠ **not obtained** (demanded: spread). Only the anecdote: *"I had a heads-up another same-family white order was about to drop in from a distributor."* Who, how far ahead, how often right: all unknown. **This is the trigger O1 hangs on.** + +**B3 — Meridian dock appointment** — *pattern* **(spelled out, qualitative)**: ship date + delivery window on the order, resolving to a specific appointment their end. Lead-time distribution ⚠. + +**B4 — Tech availability** — **partially spelled out**: two techs, **day shift**. Coverage outside day shift ⚠ (ledger #5). + +**B5 — Line 3 qualification set** — ⚠ *"mostly one or two SKUs"*; which ones, unknown. + +--- + +### 1.4 Activities + +**A1 — Lands in the demand book.** Needs the weekly pull; produces an order in the book, flagged or not; unattended (ERP); instantaneous. **spelled out** + +**A2 — Allocate to a line.** Needs an order; produces an assignment; performed by Marta; not a schedule constraint — for Meridian whites *"that's not really a decision."* Rule: P1. **spelled out** + +**A3 — Reorder the queue.** Needs an order behind others; produces a changed sequence; performed by Marta. *"Sometimes I'll reorder things a bit so it doesn't get stuck behind a big changeover."* Rule: P4. **spelled out** + +**A4 — Quick rinse, same family (white→white), Line 2** +- *Needs* — previous batch off, a tech free, next SKU same family. *Produces* — *"the fill head's actually running clean product again."* +- *Performed by* **(named)** — one tech. +- *Duration, line down* **(spread)** — **typical 25 min**; **worse 45 min**, *"usually because the tech's tied up finishing something on another line first and there's a wait before they even start on Line 2"*; **better 15 min**, *"if the tech's standing right there and it's a genuinely easy one."* +- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out)** — equals line-down: *"the tech's on it start to finish, no gap between 'crew starts' and 'line stops.'"* +- *Mode-change loss* — this activity **is** the loss. +- *Varies by type* **(named)** — yes, by family-pair (F3). By line: ⚠ ledger #1, #2. + +**A5 — White → tint, Line 2** — *"the easier direction"* +- *Performed by* **(named)** — one tech. +- *Duration, line down* **(spread)** — **typical 45 min**; **worse "an hour and a bit"** (ledger #3), *"if the tech gets pulled away partway through"*; **better ~30 min**, *"if everything's staged."* +- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative)** — *"hands-on for most of it — this one doesn't have much soak-and-wait, it's mostly just doing the work."* Fraction: ledger #4. + +**A6 — Tint → white, Line 2, full washdown** — *"the ugly one"* +- *Needs* — as A5 plus a **passing visual check** before release to production. +- *Duration, line down* **(spread)** — **typical ~3 h**; **worse 4 h "maybe a bit more"** (ledger #3), *"if it doesn't pass the visual check first time and they have to redo part of it"*; **better ~2 h**, *"a clean fast one… if the crew's good and nothing complicates it."* +- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative; her own hedge preserved)** — *"less than the 3 hours suggests — there's real soak and rinse-cycle time where the tech's not standing there… I'd guess they're actually working maybe half of that."* Fraction: ledger #4. +- *Rationale* **(spelled out)** — *"any pigment left behind ruins a white batch, so it's a full washdown."* +- **Asymmetry is load-bearing** — *"It absolutely depends on direction — that's the thing people forget… it is absolutely not symmetric, and it trips people up if they assume it is."* + +**A7 — Into / out of specialty clear, Line 1** +- *Duration, line down* **(spread)** — **typical 2 h**, *"roughly the same both directions, unlike white/tint"*; **worse 3 h**, *"if it's coming out of clear and they're being extra careful about residue, since clear can be sneaky — you don't always see it the way you'd see pigment"*; **better 1.5 h**, *"a quick swap and the line was already fairly clean."* +- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative)** — *"most of that — specialty doesn't have the long soak cycles… it's more just physically thorough cleaning because the product's thick and clingy."* Fraction: ledger #4. + +**A8 — Run the batch** — mix, mill, tint (or *"straight through if it's a plain white"*), fill, pack. +- *Needs* **(spelled out)** — clean line in the right family state; batch released to run. *Produces* **(spelled out)** — filled and packed batch. +- *Performed by* — ⚠ line operators never elicited as a resource. +- *Duration* — ⚠ **nothing obtained** (demanded: spread, per family and per line). +- *Varies by type* — partially: *"for a white that's usually the more straightforward path"*, but no durations attach. +- **The largest hole in the model.** O1 is a question about a week; run time is most of a week. + +**A9 — QA hold and release** — *"every batch does."* +- *Performed by* **(named)** — the lab (E5). +- *Duration* — *"typically a few hours before it's released"*: an honest **number at the wrong precision**; demanded as a **spread**. ⚠ +- *Failure path* — ⚠ never asked. +- *Pathology* **(spelled out qualitatively; rate ⚠)** — *"if QA's backed up on a Friday afternoon, that's where it actually goes sideways, not on the line"*; *"the QA step is the one people don't think about when they're mad at scheduling."* + +**A10 — Stage for shipping and ship.** Needs QA release; produces the order off the dock; *"that's when the truck appointment matters."* Constraint C4. Duration ⚠. + +**A11 — Tech pulled away mid-changeover** *(event, not step)* — named as the mechanism behind A4's and A5's worse tails. *Rate* ⚠ not obtained separately; currently only implicit in those tails (P01 unsatisfied). + +**A12 — Washdown fails the visual check, part redone** *(event, not step)* — named as the mechanism behind A6's 4 h tail. *Rate* ⚠ (ledger #7). + +**A13 — "The mill motor issue"** *(event, named in passing only)* — offered as an example of what a *structural* line difference would look like, in contrast to Line 1 merely being fussier. Rate ⚠, duration ⚠, consequence ⚠. This is the entirety of the breakdown stratum, which was never swept. + +--- + +### 1.5 Ordering / flow + +**F1 — The main arc, desk to dock** **(spelled out — her six steps)** +1. Lands in the demand book (ERP weekly pull). +2. Allocated to a line (*"Meridian whites always go to Line 2"*). +3. Sits in the queue behind whatever's running — reorderable (A3/P4). +4. Changeover if needed (F3), then runs: mix, mill, tint-or-straight-through, fill, pack. +5. QA hold. +6. Released, staged, out against the truck appointment. + +**F2 — Order-to-batch split** — *order* **(spelled out)**: one batch by default, possibly two run at different times. *Branch decided by* **(spelled out)**: Marta, on run size or urgency-interleaving. *Cost of a split* ⚠ (P03 unresolved). + +**F3 — Which changeover applies** **(spelled out)** — by (family on the line, family of next batch, line): same family → **A4**; white→tint → **A5**; tint→white → **A6**; into/out of specialty → **A7** (Line 1 only). + +--- + +### 1.6 Policies + +**P1 — "Meridian whites always go to Line 2, that's just how it's done here."** *Practiced* **(spelled out)**; a fixed allocation, not a decision. Overrides ⚠ never asked. + +**P2 — Meridian on-time is absolute.** *Practiced* **(spelled out)** — *"we don't even try to be clever about it."* Overrides **(spelled out)**: none — that is the policy's content. Rationale: fine, on-time percentage, delisting precedent. + +**P3 — Who gets the tech when two lines want one** +- *Prescribed form:* **none exists** — *"there's no posted rule at all."* +- *As practiced* **(spelled out)** — in the room: *"whoever's louder at the huddle, or whoever's about to actually run dry."* The underlying logic: *"it's mostly gut triage: whichever line has the more time-sensitive order behind it wins, and if that's a tie, whichever changeover is faster wins so you get a line moving sooner."* +- *Borderline case on record* — Line 1 and Line 3 both wanted a washdown one morning. **Line 3 got the tech**, *"not because it was more important, but because Line 3's changeover was the quick one and Line 1's was going to be the long tint-to-white slog anyway, so the thinking was 'knock out the fast one, get that line moving, then commit the tech to the long one.'"* Line 1 sat **clean-but-waiting almost 40 minutes**. +- *What overrides it* **(spelled out)** — the ops director: *"I've been overruled by the ops director once when he wanted his pet SKU out the door."* +- *Rationale* **(spelled out)** — *"the crew's a shared resource and sometimes there's a queue for them before the clock even starts on the line"* — *"the bit that actually causes grief at the huddle."* + +**P4 — Reorder so a job isn't stuck behind a big changeover.** *Practiced* **(spelled out)**. Overrides ⚠. + +**P5 — Hold the line for an anticipated same-family order** *(the decision under test)*. *Practiced, one instance* **(spelled out)** — hold Line 2 idle *"maybe an hour"* rather than wash down for the waiting tint, *"because doing them back to back would save us a full washdown."* Trigger strength and holding threshold ⚠ (depends on B2). + +**P6 — Batch-split discretion.** *Practiced* **(spelled out)** — *"I have the freedom to split if I need to."* Overrides ⚠. + +--- + +### 1.7 Constraints + +**C1 — Line qualification.** *Limit* **(partially spelled out)** — Line 1 everything incl. specialty; Line 3 product-by-product, *"can't run everything yet"* (which SKUs ⚠); Line 2's set ⚠. *When hit* **(spelled out)** — the batch cannot go on that line. + +**C2 — Two techs, three lines.** *Limit* **(spelled out)**. *When hit* **(spelled out)** — *"if Line 1 and Line 3 both want a washdown at the same time, one of them waits"* — clean-but-idle, 40 min in the recorded case; resolved by P3. + +**C3 — Tint→white needs a full washdown passing a visual check.** *When hit* **(spelled out)** — *"any pigment left behind ruins a white batch"*; a failed check means part is redone (A12). + +**C4 — Meridian must leave our dock a day ahead of the appointment.** *When hit* **(spelled out)** — fine, on-time percentage damage, delisting exposure. + +**C5 — Every batch passes QA hold before release.** *When hit* **(spelled out)** — nothing ships unreleased; it waits in hold. + +**Unwritten constraints** — ⚠ the closing sweep was never run. The one that surfaced unprompted is the changeover asymmetry: *"that one catches everybody, including people who've been on the floor a lot longer than me."* + +--- + +### 1.8 Dynamics + +**None.** Nothing described evolves continuously while nothing discrete happens. The soak and rinse-cycle time inside A6 is dead time *within* an activity, not a state variable crossing a threshold; I have deliberately not promoted it to one. + +--- + +### 1.9 Data bindings *(named only — project to nothing today)* + +| Feed | Would drive | Provenance | +|---|---|---| +| Changeover logs (tech start/finish) | A4–A7 durations, crew hands-on fractions; retires ledger #1, #4 | **Qualified:** *"I've never audited that field myself, I mostly just glance at duration."* Coverage unknown, possibly patchy; **Line 1 and Line 3** named as where to look. Marta will flag it to the two techs. | +| ERP demand book | B1, B2 | not discussed | +| QA release timestamps | A9 duration, lab queueing | not discussed | +| Meridian on-time percentage | O2 | tracked by Meridian; visible to commercial | + +**Finding in its own right:** patchy changeover logging concentrated on Lines 1 and 3 is evidence about the plant, not merely an obstacle — *"that itself would be useful for you to know, not just an inconvenience."* + +--- + +### 1.10 Validation criteria + +⚠ **None obtained.** How Marta would know the model is right was never asked. + +--- + +## 2. Assumption ledger + +Everything here is mine. None of it is hers. + +| # | Assumption | Why | How to check | +|---|---|---|---| +| **1** | Line 1 changeover durations = Line 2 × **1.2**, all types | She could not give Line 1 minutes — *"I couldn't swear the minutes are identical… the crew sometimes says it's fussier."* I proposed 20%; she replied *"20% sounds about right, not double."* **The factor originated with me**; her assent is not authorship. | Changeover logs, Line 1 vs Line 2, same family-pair. **Blocked by the unaudited start/finish field — and Line 1 is one of the two lines she expects to be patchy.** | +| **2** | Line 3 changeover durations = Line 2, unscaled | *"Line 3 I genuinely don't have a good feel for… you're stuck assuming it's like Line 1 or Line 2."* She offered the disjunction; **picking Line 2 was mine.** | As #1, once Line 3 has run more products. Also expected patchy. | +| **3** | "An hour and a bit" (A5 worse) = **70 min**; "4, maybe a bit more" (A6 worse) = **4.5 h** | Numeric readings so the spreads are usable. | One question to Marta: confirm or correct. | +| **4** | Crew hands-on: A4 = **1.0**, A5 = **0.8**, A6 = **0.5**, A7 = **0.8** | A4's 1.0 is hers, stated. A6's 0.5 tracks *"maybe half of that"* — but note her hedge, *"I'd guess."* **The two 0.8s, from "most of it" / "most of that", are mine.** | Changeover logs vs tech time records, or ask the techs. Same blocker as #1. | +| **5** | No changeover outside day shift | She said *"two techs on **day shift**"*; other coverage never asked. | One question to Marta. | +| **6** | A changeover needs exactly **one** tech | She said *"the tech"*, singular, throughout — including the 3-hour washdown. | One question to Marta or the techs. | +| **7** | A12 folded **inside** A6's 4 h tail rather than a separate event with its own rate | She described it as *the cause of* the tail. Keeps the spread self-contained; contrary to P01, which would separate rate from duration. | Ask how often the visual check fails first time; split it out if common. | +| **8** | The two techs are **interchangeable** | She drew no distinction. | One question to Marta. | + +**Second-order note on #1 and #4:** their check depends on a feed of unverified coverage, concentrated exactly where the assumptions bite. If the field proves patchy on Line 1, the honest move is to **widen** them, not fill them in. + +--- + +## 3. What the model leaves out, and why + +**Deliberately excluded** +- **Queues, buffers, waiting states** are not nodes — the wait behind a running batch, the wait for a tech, the wait in QA hold. Each is implied by the activities either side and emerges in projection. Line 1's 40 minutes clean-but-waiting is an **output** the model should reproduce, not an input. +- **The commercial layer** — fine amount, on-time percentage mechanics, delisting threshold. C4 and O2 carry the hard deadline; the money is outside the scheduler's sight and commercial owns it. +- **Individual tech identity** (ledger #8). **Scenarios** — assembled from B1–B5 at simulation time, not elicited. + +**Real, and the formalism cannot carry it — kept in words** +- **O4, "how ugly the sheet looks."** A criterion she genuinely uses and explicitly refuses to number. Approximating it as line idle hours would be my move; I have not made it. +- **The O2 / O3 / lateness trade-off weight.** Unquantified with the source named. The model can report changeover hours, Meridian lateness and distributor lateness **separately**, but cannot rank two schedules that trade one against another — a real limit on O1, whose "costs less" implicitly spans them. +- **The decay of softness** — the same distributor slipping *"the third week running"* turning into a discount demand: a memory effect across weeks on one customer, stated as a rule, unquantified, unrepresented. +- **The huddle.** *"Whoever's louder"* and the ops director's pet-SKU override are the real P3 in the room. The triage logic is compilable; loudness and the override are not. **Any run of this model will be quieter and more rational than the plant.** Remember that when a result looks tidy. + +--- + +## 4. What remains unknown, in the order I would close it + +1. **A8 run duration** — nothing at all, per family and per line, as a spread. **Nothing about O1 is answerable until this exists.** +2. **B2, the drop-in and the heads-up** — who, how far ahead, how often right. P5 is the decision under test and its trigger is one anecdote. +3. **A9 QA hold** — *"a few hours"* is honest at the wrong precision; and whether the lab queues like the techs. By her own account this is where lateness actually comes from, so it bears directly on O2. +4. **B1** — orders per weekly pull and within-week shape. +5. **E2 / F2** — run sizes, the "reasonable run size" threshold, and what a split costs in extra changeovers. +6. **C1 / B5** — which SKUs Line 3 is qualified for; whether Line 2 has restrictions. +7. **Breakdowns and interruptions** — the whole stratum. A13 is a name with no rate, duration or consequence; A11 and A12 need rate separated from duration. +8. **Unwritten-constraint sweep** and **validation criteria** — neither was run. + +**Status against the completion criteria** +- **Static floor: satisfied** — 4 objectives, 5 entity types, 13 activities, 3 ordering/flow nodes. +- **O2, O3:** slices substantially satisfied except A8 and A9 durations. +- **O1: slice incomplete.** A8 has no duration; B2 has no arrival pattern. O1 is currently **answerable only for Line 2**, and only once run times exist. Ledger #1–#4 are the first assumptions to attack if any Line 1 or Line 3 result ever looks decisive. +- **O4:** recorded; unsupported for quantitative use, by its author's own description. + +**What I do not claim.** I have elicited a model, not built a net. The SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar and the typed loss report are derived from this model by the tooling's projection — I have not written them, and I am not claiming this loads, compiles, or runs. The A8 hole alone would stop it. + +--- + +*Session closed at the expert's stop. Three questions queued for resumption: run duration for a plain white on Line 2 (typical / one-in-ten worse / one-in-ten better); the heads-up mechanism behind B2; QA hold as a spread, and whether the lab queues.* diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-4.raw.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-4.raw.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2d0d904c889 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-4.raw.json @@ -0,0 +1,825 @@ +{ + "startedAt": "2026-08-25T15:14:42.641Z", + "condition": "4", + "stopReason": "delivered-after-forced-wrap", + "calls": [ + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 10843, + "output_tokens": 255, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 235, + "output_tokens": 4, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 3646, + "output_tokens": 341, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 11376, + "output_tokens": 538, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 265, + "output_tokens": 16, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 4213, + "output_tokens": 429, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 12031, + "output_tokens": 280, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 195, + "output_tokens": 4, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 4789, + "output_tokens": 410, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 12588, + "output_tokens": 507, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 235, + "output_tokens": 16, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 5385, + "output_tokens": 380, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 13154, + "output_tokens": 405, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 224, + "output_tokens": 4, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 5939, + "output_tokens": 263, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 13591, + "output_tokens": 189, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 187, + "output_tokens": 4, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 6329, + "output_tokens": 400, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 14118, + "output_tokens": 224, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 200, + "output_tokens": 16, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 6878, + "output_tokens": 451, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 14718, + "output_tokens": 396, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 278, + "output_tokens": 16, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 7579, + "output_tokens": 246, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 15252, + "output_tokens": 938, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 402, + "output_tokens": 16, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 8279, + "output_tokens": 369, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 16037, + "output_tokens": 10357, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 6044, + "output_tokens": 16, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 16210, + "output_tokens": 62, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 23661, + "output_tokens": 289, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 285, + "output_tokens": 4, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 16520, + "output_tokens": 42, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 23951, + "output_tokens": 79, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 121, + "output_tokens": 4, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 16613, + "output_tokens": 67, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 24069, + "output_tokens": 343, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 318, + "output_tokens": 16, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 16994, + "output_tokens": 82, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 24465, + "output_tokens": 218, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 233, + "output_tokens": 4, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 17272, + "output_tokens": 118, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 24779, + "output_tokens": 452, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 359, + "output_tokens": 16, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 17762, + "output_tokens": 27, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 25178, + "output_tokens": 41, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 91, + "output_tokens": 4, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 17801, + "output_tokens": 10, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 25200, + "output_tokens": 32, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 88, + "output_tokens": 4, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 17817, + "output_tokens": 17, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 25223, + "output_tokens": 127, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 96, + "output_tokens": 4, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 17852, + "output_tokens": 21, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 25262, + "output_tokens": 37, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 90, + "output_tokens": 4, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "expert", + "model": "claude-sonnet-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 17885, + "output_tokens": 6, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 25280, + "output_tokens": 1, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 25280, + "output_tokens": 25, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 87, + "output_tokens": 4, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 25310, + "output_tokens": 11567, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 9053, + "output_tokens": 16, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "interviewer", + "model": "claude-opus-5", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 36786, + "output_tokens": 9586, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + }, + { + "agent": "classifier", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 7411, + "output_tokens": 4, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0 + } + } + ], + "interviewerMessages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": "I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we\nschedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling\nthat runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to\nthat — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person.\n\nPlease interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "Good — that's enough for me to start. I'll ask you about your operation in your own words; the format side is my problem, not yours.\n\nBefore anything about how the plant is built, I want to know what the model has to be *for*. Two things to start:\n\n1. When your boss says \"test scheduling decisions before making them\" — what's a decision you'd actually want to test? Give me a real one you've argued about recently, not a general category.\n\n2. And when you compare two schedules today, what makes one better than the other in your eyes? I'm after the thing you'd actually point at — a number, a complaint you'd avoid, whatever it is." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Okay, real one: two weeks ago I had a Meridian white order finishing on Line 2 Thursday afternoon, and then a batch of tint waiting behind it. My instinct was to let Line 2 sit idle for maybe an hour because I had a heads-up another same-family white order was about to drop in from a distributor, and doing them back to back would save us a full washdown. My boss's question was basically \"are you sure that's worth it, or are you just guessing?\" And honestly — I was guessing. That's the kind of thing I'd love to test: hold the line versus wash it down now, which one actually costs less over the week.\n\nAs for what makes one schedule better than another — first thing I look at is whether Meridian shipped on time, full stop, that's non-negotiable. After that it's changeover hours, because every hour the crew spends washing down is an hour not filling anything. And honestly I also just glance at how ugly the sheet looks — like, are there gaps where a line's sitting idle for no good reason. That last one's not a number, it's more a gut check, but it's real." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "That's a good, concrete decision — hold the line for a possible same-family order versus wash down now. I'll build the model so that's testable.\n\nTwo things about \"better\", then I'll get you to walk me through a job:\n\n1. Meridian on-time is non-negotiable — what does \"on time\" actually mean in practice? A ship date on the order, a truck appointment, a promised week? And what happens when one *does* go late — who feels it and how?\n\n2. Changeover hours versus a late non-Meridian order: if a schedule saved you, say, four changeover hours but made one distributor order two days late, would you take it? I'm trying to find out whether these trade against each other at all, or whether lateness for everyone else is just soft." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Good questions, let me take them separately.\n\nOn \"on time\" for Meridian — it's a ship date they give us via the order, usually with a delivery window attached, like a specific dock appointment on their end. So it's not just \"shipped this week,\" it's \"shipped in time to hit that appointment,\" which usually means it needs to leave our dock a day ahead for freight. If we miss it, first thing is a fine — I don't see the number, that's commercial's problem, but I hear about it. Second thing, worse honestly, is they track our on-time percentage and if it drops too far they threaten to delist SKUs. That's happened to a competitor of ours, so it's not an empty threat, and it's why the rule is absolute — we don't even try to be clever about it.\n\nOn the trade-off — honestly, yes, I'd take that trade most of the time, four hours of changeover is real money and crew time, and a distributor slipping two days is usually just an annoyed phone call from our sales rep, not a fine. But \"most of the time\" is doing a lot of work in that sentence — if it's the same distributor slipping late for the third week running, that's different, they'll start asking for a discount. So it's soft, but it's not infinitely soft. I couldn't put a number on it though — that's genuinely a \"sit down with commercial\" conversation, nobody's ever made me quantify it." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "That's clear, and I'll record the trade-off as deliberately unquantified rather than invent a weight — I'll flag it as needing commercial, since you've told me exactly where the number would come from.\n\nNow let's get the structure. Take that Meridian white order from two weeks ago and walk me through it as a sequence — from the moment it lands on your desk to the moment it's off the dock. Keep it to the main steps, five or six; I'll dig into each one after." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Sure, let me walk it through.\n\n1. **It lands in the demand book** — comes over from ERP on the weekly pull, SKU, quantity, due date, flagged Meridian so it jumps to the top of my attention.\n2. **I allocate it to Line 2** — that's not really a decision, Meridian whites always go to Line 2, that's just how it's done here.\n3. **It sits in the queue behind whatever's running** — depending what's ahead of it, sometimes I'll reorder things a bit so it doesn't get stuck behind a big changeover.\n4. **Changeover if needed, then it runs** — mix, mill, tint or straight through if it's a plain white, then fill and pack. For a white that's usually the more straightforward path.\n5. **It goes into QA hold** — every batch does, typically a few hours before it's released.\n6. **Once released, it's staged for shipping** — and that's when the truck appointment matters, because if QA's backed up on a Friday afternoon, that's where it actually goes sideways, not on the line.\n\nThat's the whole arc, really — desk to dock. The QA step is the one people don't think about when they're mad at scheduling; half the time a \"late\" order was actually sitting done in QA hold waiting for the lab to get to it." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "That QA point is exactly the kind of thing that gets left out of a first account — I'll come back to it properly.\n\nFirst let me pin down what you're actually scheduling. You said \"Meridian white order\", \"a batch of tint\", \"same-family white\". Three things:\n\n1. Is the thing you schedule the *order*, or does an order get broken into batches that could run at different times? What's the relationship?\n\n2. What are the families? You used \"same-family white\" as if it's a defined grouping — is that a formal thing on the SKU, or your judgment?\n\n3. And how many lines are there, besides Line 2?" + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "1. Mostly the order *is* the batch, if it fits a reasonable run size — a lot of our orders are big enough that we just run the whole thing as one batch. But sometimes I'll split one: if a distributor orders more than makes sense in a single run, or if I need to interleave it with something more urgent, I'll chop it into two batches and run them at different times. So it's order-to-batch most of the time, but not a strict one-to-one — I have the freedom to split if I need to.\n\n2. The families are real, they're on the SKU — every product's either a base white, a tinted colour, or a specialty clear. That's not my judgment, that's how the SKU's classified in the system, it drives what changeover you need going in and out. \"Same-family\" just means two SKUs both being whites, or both being tints, so the changeover between them is the cheap quick-rinse kind instead of the expensive family-switch kind.\n\n3. Three lines total. Line 1's the old workhorse — slower but it's qualified for everything, including specialty. Line 2's the fast one, that's your big-volume runner. Line 3's the newest and quickest, but it's still being qualified product by product, so it can't run everything yet." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "Changeover is at the heart of the decision you want to test, so let's do it properly.\n\nYou've named two kinds: the quick rinse between same-family SKUs, and the full washdown on a family switch. For the **quick rinse between two whites on Line 2** — the exact case from two weeks ago:\n\n1. Typically, how long does it take, start to finish, before the next batch is filling?\n2. One time in ten it goes worse than — what?\n3. And one time in ten it's better than — what?\n\nGive me the crew time too if it differs from line downtime." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "For a straight white-to-white rinse on Line 2:\n\n1. Typically? Call it 25 minutes, start to finish, before the fill head's actually running clean product again.\n2. Worse case — one time in ten it drags to maybe 45 minutes, usually because the tech's tied up finishing something on another line first and there's a wait before they even start on Line 2.\n3. Better case — one time in ten, if the tech's standing right there and it's a genuinely easy one, 15 minutes and you're rolling again.\n\nCrew time and line downtime are basically the same thing here — it's quick enough that the tech's on it start to finish, no gap between \"crew starts\" and \"line stops.\" That's different from the big washdowns, where the line's down way longer than the crew's actually hands-on, because there's soak time and QA checks in between." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "That distinction — line down longer than crew hands-on — matters, so let's get the washdown with both.\n\nFor a **family switch on Line 2**, say white to tint: typically how long is the line down, one time in ten worse than, one time in ten better than? And roughly how much of that is the tech actually hands-on?\n\nAlso: does it depend on direction — is tint-to-white the same as white-to-tint?" + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "It absolutely depends on direction — that's the thing people forget.\n\n**White to tint**, the easier direction: line's down typically about 45 minutes. Worse case, maybe an hour and a bit if the tech gets pulled away partway through. Better case, if everything's staged, maybe half an hour. Of that, the tech's hands-on for most of it — this one doesn't have much soak-and-wait, it's mostly just doing the work.\n\n**Tint to white** is the ugly one, because any pigment left behind ruins a white batch, so it's a full washdown. Typically about 3 hours, line down the whole time. Worse case — if it doesn't pass the visual check first time and they have to redo part of it — could stretch to 4, maybe a bit more. Better case, a clean fast one, maybe 2 hours if the crew's good and nothing complicates it. Hands-on time for the crew is actually less than the 3 hours suggests — there's real soak and rinse-cycle time where the tech's not standing there, they might duck off to start something on another line. I'd guess they're actually working maybe half of that, the rest is the line just being down waiting on the process.\n\nSo no, it is absolutely not symmetric, and it trips people up if they assume it is." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "Good — asymmetric, and I've got both directions.\n\nTwo things to close out changeover:\n\n1. Specialty clear is the third family — what does going into and out of clear cost, on Line 1 since that's the one qualified for it? Same shape of answer: typical, one-in-ten worse, one-in-ten better, either direction if they differ.\n\n2. Do the white/tint numbers you just gave me hold on Line 1 and Line 3, or are they line-specific?" + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "1. Specialty is roughly the same both directions, unlike white/tint — call it 2 hours typical, either going in or coming out. Worse case, maybe 3 hours if it's coming out of clear and they're being extra careful about residue, since clear can be sneaky — you don't always see it the way you'd see pigment. Better case, maybe an hour and a half if it's a quick swap and the line was already fairly clean. Hands-on for the crew is most of that — specialty doesn't have the long soak cycles the tint-to-white washdown has, it's more just physically thorough cleaning because the product's thick and clingy.\n\n2. Honestly, I've mostly been quoting you Line 2 numbers because that's where the argument happened. I *think* the same rough shape holds on Line 1 — quick rinse cheap, tint-to-white expensive and slow, white-to-tint quicker — but I couldn't swear the minutes are identical. Line 1's older, the crew sometimes says it's fussier to get properly clean. Line 3 I genuinely don't have a good feel for, because it hasn't run enough different products yet to have built up war stories — it's still mostly running whatever it's been qualified for, which so far is mostly one or two SKUs. So if you need Line 3 numbers, that might be one where you're stuck assuming it's like Line 1 or Line 2 until we've got more history." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "That's the right answer — I'd rather have \"I don't know\" than invented minutes. Here's what I'd assume unless you tell me otherwise, and I'll mark it as mine, not yours:\n\n- **Line 1**: same shape as Line 2, with all changeover durations scaled up — say 20% longer — on the strength of the crew's \"fussier to get properly clean\".\n- **Line 3**: same as Line 2 until history exists.\n\nBoth would be checked against the changeover logs, if the techs record start and finish. Does 20% sound like the right order of magnitude for Line 1, or is it more like double?\n\nSeparately — you just said something important in passing. The tech \"gets pulled away partway through\", \"might duck off to start something on another line\". How many changeover techs are there across the three lines?" + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "20% sounds about right, not double — it's more \"takes a bit longer to satisfy the visual check\" than \"fundamentally slower.\" Double would be if we were talking about the mill motor issue or something structurally different. So yeah, 20% longer on Line 1 feels like the right order of magnitude, not a multiplier like 2x.\n\nOn the crew — there's two techs on day shift covering all three lines between them. That's it. No dedicated tech per line. So if Line 1 and Line 3 both want a washdown at the same time, one of them waits, and that's the bit that actually causes grief at the huddle — it's not that the changeover itself is unpredictable, it's that the crew's a shared resource and sometimes there's a queue for them before the clock even starts on the line.\n\n(Sorry — I've just seen the time, I have the floor huddle in ten minutes. How much more do you need?)" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "Ten minutes is enough for one thing, so let me tell you where we are and then ask the one that matters most.\n\n**What I have:** the two objectives, the six-step arc, three lines, three families, all the changeover numbers for Line 2 with spreads, the asymmetry, the two techs as a shared resource.\n\n**What's still missing** — roughly six or seven things, and two of them are load-bearing for the exact decision you want to test:\n\n- how long a batch actually *runs* (I have changeovers but no run times at all)\n- how the \"heads-up another order was about to drop\" actually reaches you — that's the trigger your whole hold-the-line decision hangs on\n- QA hold as a spread, and whether the lab is a shared resource like the techs\n- the order arrival pattern off the ERP weekly pull\n- run sizes and what splitting a batch costs\n- which SKUs Line 3 is actually qualified for\n- what breaks, and how often\n\nNone of that needs to happen now. My question for the remaining minutes, because it's the one I can't guess and it's the one that made you say \"grief at the huddle\":\n\n**When both lines want a washdown at once and one tech has to pick — what actually decides it?** Not the rule as posted. Think of the last time it happened: which line got the tech, and what was the reason?" + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Honestly, there's no posted rule at all — it's whoever's louder at the huddle, or whoever's about to actually run dry.\n\nLast time it happened, off the top of my head — Line 1 and Line 3 both wanted a washdown same morning. Line 3 got the tech first, not because it was more important, but because Line 3's changeover was the quick one and Line 1's was going to be the long tint-to-white slog anyway, so the thinking was \"knock out the fast one, get that line moving, then commit the tech to the long one.\" Line 1 sat clean-but-waiting for almost 40 minutes past when it could've started.\n\nIf you push me on the actual logic — it's mostly gut triage: whichever line has the more time-sensitive order behind it wins, and if that's a tie, whichever changeover is faster wins so you get a line moving sooner. Nobody writes this down, it's literally whoever's standing at the huddle table making the case loudest. I've been overruled by the ops director once when he wanted his pet SKU out the door.\n\nI do need to run — but this was useful, come back to the QA and run-time stuff next time, those are real gaps." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "You've stopped, so I'm not opening anything new. Here's the model as it stands, read back item by item, with the gaps named honestly. The two things you flagged — QA and run times — are the first things on the list when you're back.\n\n---\n\n# 1. The model\n\nVocabulary is yours throughout. Each slot shows the value **and** the precision actually obtained. `⚠` marks a slot the model demands and does not yet have.\n\n## Objectives\n\n**O1 — \"Hold the line versus wash it down now, which one actually costs less over the week\"**\n- *The question, in your words:* whether letting Line 2 sit idle for ~1 hour waiting on an anticipated same-family white order is cheaper over a week than washing down to the tint batch now. — **spelled out**\n- *Depends on:* E1 Order, E2 Batch, E3 Line, E4 Changeover tech, B1 ERP weekly pull, B2 mid-week order drop-in, A4/A5/A6 changeovers, A8 run batch, A9 QA hold, F1 main arc, P1, P3, P5, C2, C4.\n- *What \"better\" means:* changeover hours consumed over the week, subject to O2 holding absolutely. — **named, not quantified against O4** ⚠\n\n**O2 — \"Meridian shipped on time, full stop, that's non-negotiable\"**\n- *The question:* does every Meridian order leave the dock in time for its dock appointment. — **spelled out**\n- *\"On time\" =* ship date + delivery window given on the order, resolving to a specific dock appointment their end; must leave our dock **one day ahead** for freight. — **spelled out**\n- *Consequence of a miss:* a fine (amount not visible to you — commercial's) and a hit to the tracked on-time percentage; if that drops far enough, threatened SKU delisting — a competitor has been delisted, so it's treated as real. — **spelled out, unquantified** ⚠\n- *Depends on:* A9 QA hold, A10 stage & ship, C4, P1, P2, B3.\n\n**O3 — Changeover hours**\n- *The question:* how many crew-hours go into washdowns rather than filling. \"Every hour the crew spends washing down is an hour not filling anything.\" — **spelled out**\n- *Depends on:* A4, A5, A6, A7, E4, C2, P3.\n\n**O4 — \"How ugly the sheet looks\" — idle gaps with no good reason**\n- *The question:* are lines sitting idle for no good reason. — **spelled out**\n- *\"Better\" =* explicitly a gut check, not a number, \"but it's real\". — **your words: not quantified** ⚠ (IR-only; see §3)\n\n**Trade-off between O2, O3 and lateness for non-Meridian:** you would take 4 changeover hours saved against one distributor order two days late \"most of the time\" — a distributor slip is \"an annoyed phone call from our sales rep, not a fine\" — but the same distributor slipping three weeks running turns into a discount demand. So: soft, not infinitely soft, **and deliberately unquantified**. Deposit: you named the source — \"sit down with commercial\". Nobody has ever made you quantify it. ⚠\n\n## Entity types\n\n**E1 — Order (from the demand book)**\n- *Distinctions the process treats apart:* Meridian vs. non-Meridian (Meridian \"jumps to the top of my attention\", on-time absolute); family classification on the SKU. — **spelled out**\n- *State riding along:* SKU, quantity, due date + delivery window, Meridian flag, family (base white / tinted colour / specialty clear — a real field in the system, not your judgment). — **spelled out**\n- *How many / population shape:* ⚠ not obtained — arrival volume per weekly pull unknown.\n\n**E2 — Batch**\n- *Distinctions:* same three families as the order it came from. — **spelled out**\n- *Relationship to order:* \"mostly the order *is* the batch, if it fits a reasonable run size\"; you may split into two batches run at different times when a distributor orders more than makes sense in one run, or to interleave something more urgent. Not a strict one-to-one; the split is your discretion. — **spelled out**\n- *Population shape:* ⚠ run sizes not obtained; cost of a split not obtained.\n\n**E3 — Line** — a contended resource\n- *Distinctions:* **Line 1** — \"the old workhorse\", slower, qualified for everything including specialty, crew say it's \"fussier to get properly clean\". **Line 2** — the fast one, big-volume runner. **Line 3** — newest and quickest, still being qualified product by product, \"can't run everything yet\", so far mostly one or two SKUs. — **spelled out**\n- *State riding along:* which family the line is currently dirty with (this is what selects the changeover); qualification set. — **spelled out**\n- *How many:* 3. — **number**\n\n**E4 — Changeover tech** — a contended resource\n- *Distinctions:* none stated between the two techs. — **named**\n- *State riding along:* which line they're currently committed to; can be \"pulled away partway through\". — **spelled out**\n- *How many:* 2 on day shift, covering all three lines, no dedicated tech per line. — **number**\n\n**E5 — QA lab**\n- *Distinctions / state / population:* ⚠ nothing obtained beyond its existence and that it can be \"backed up on a Friday afternoon\". Whether it's a shared resource like the techs is an open question you and I both flagged.\n\n## Boundary conditions\n\n**B1 — ERP weekly pull into the demand book**\n- *Starting state:* orders arrive over from ERP on the weekly pull, carrying SKU, quantity, due date, Meridian flag. — **spelled out**\n- *Arrival pattern:* ⚠ **not obtained** — no volume, no spread, no within-week shape. Demanded as a spread.\n\n**B2 — Mid-week order drop-in (\"another same-family white order was about to drop in from a distributor\")**\n- *Starting state / pattern:* ⚠ **not obtained.** This is the trigger the whole of O1 hangs on and I have only the one anecdote: you had \"a heads-up\". How that heads-up reaches you, from whom, how far ahead, and how often it turns out to be right are all unknown. Demanded as a spread; currently zero.\n\n**B3 — Meridian dock appointment**\n- *Pattern:* ship date with a delivery window on the order, resolving to a specific dock appointment their end. — **spelled out**\n- *Distribution of lead time:* ⚠ not obtained.\n\n**B4 — Tech availability calendar**\n- ⚠ only \"two techs on day shift\" obtained. Whether there is any night/weekend changeover coverage was never asked.\n\n**B5 — Line 3 qualification set at start of run**\n- ⚠ \"mostly one or two SKUs\" — **not spelled out**; which SKUs is unknown.\n\n## Activities\n\n**A1 — Lands in the demand book** — *needs:* the weekly ERP pull. *Produces:* an Order in the book, Meridian-flagged or not. *Performed by:* ERP / not attended. *Duration:* n/a (instantaneous receipt). **spelled out**\n\n**A2 — Allocate to a line** — *needs:* an order in the book. *Produces:* order assigned to a line. *Performed by:* you. *Duration:* not a scheduling constraint; \"not really a decision\" for Meridian whites. **spelled out** (rule in P1)\n\n**A3 — Reorder the queue** — *needs:* an order sitting behind others. *Produces:* changed run sequence. *Performed by:* you. *Rule:* P4. — **spelled out**\n\n**A4 — Quick rinse (same family, e.g. white → white) on Line 2**\n- *Needs:* line free, previous batch off, a tech available, next SKU same family. *Produces:* line clean for next batch, fill head running clean product.\n- *Performed by:* 1 changeover tech. — **named**\n- *Duration (line down):* typical **25 min**; one-in-ten worse **45 min** (tech tied up finishing on another line, so a wait before they even start); one-in-ten better **15 min** (tech standing right there, genuinely easy one). — **spread**\n- *Crew hands-on:* same as line down — \"no gap between crew starts and line stops\". — **spelled out**\n- *Varies by type?* Family pair, yes (that's what selects A4 vs A5/A6/A7). By line: ⚠ see ledger #1, #2.\n\n**A5 — Changeover white → tint on Line 2** (\"the easier direction\")\n- *Duration (line down):* typical **45 min**; worse **\"an hour and a bit\"**; better **~30 min** if everything's staged. — **spread** (see ledger #3 for my numeric reading of \"an hour and a bit\")\n- *Crew hands-on:* \"most of it — doesn't have much soak-and-wait, it's mostly just doing the work\". — **spelled out qualitatively**, ledger #4 for the fraction\n- *Cause of the worse tail:* tech gets pulled away partway through. — **spelled out**\n\n**A6 — Changeover tint → white on Line 2 — the full washdown** (\"the ugly one\")\n- *Needs:* as A4, plus a passing visual check before release to production.\n- *Duration (line down):* typical **~3 h**; worse **4 h, \"maybe a bit more\"** — when it doesn't pass the visual check first time and they redo part of it; better **~2 h** with a good crew and nothing complicating. — **spread**\n- *Crew hands-on:* \"maybe half of that\" — real soak and rinse-cycle time where the tech isn't standing there and \"might duck off to start something on another line\". — **spelled out qualitatively**, ledger #4\n- *Rationale:* \"any pigment left behind ruins a white batch\". — **spelled out**\n- **Asymmetry is load-bearing:** white→tint ≠ tint→white, \"it trips people up if they assume it is\". — **spelled out**\n\n**A7 — Changeover into / out of specialty clear, on Line 1**\n- *Duration (line down):* typical **2 h**, roughly the same both directions \"unlike white/tint\"; worse **3 h**, especially coming out of clear, \"clear can be sneaky — you don't always see it the way you'd see pigment\"; better **1.5 h** on a quick swap with the line already fairly clean. — **spread**\n- *Crew hands-on:* \"most of that\" — no long soak cycles; it's physically thorough cleaning because the product's thick and clingy. — **spelled out qualitatively**, ledger #4\n\n**A8 — Run the batch** — mix, mill, tint (or straight through if it's a plain white), fill, pack. \"For a white that's usually the more straightforward path.\"\n- *Needs:* clean line, batch released to run. *Produces:* filled and packed batch. — **spelled out**\n- *Performed by:* ⚠ line operators not elicited.\n- *Duration:* ⚠ **nothing obtained.** Demanded as a spread, per family and per line. This is the largest single hole in the model — O1 is a question about a *week*, and without run times there is no week.\n\n**A9 — QA hold and release** — every batch goes through it.\n- *Needs:* packed batch. *Produces:* released batch, or (presumably) something else on failure — ⚠ failure path never asked.\n- *Performed by:* the lab. *Duration:* **\"typically a few hours\"** — an honest figure at the wrong precision; demanded as a spread. ⚠\n- *Known failure mode:* \"if QA's backed up on a Friday afternoon, that's where it actually goes sideways, not on the line\"; \"half the time a 'late' order was actually sitting done in QA hold waiting for the lab to get to it.\" — **spelled out qualitatively**; the rate and the queueing mechanism are ⚠.\n\n**A10 — Stage for shipping / ship** — *needs:* QA release. *Produces:* order off the dock. *Timing constraint:* C4. — **spelled out**; duration ⚠.\n\n**A11 — Tech pulled away mid-changeover** (event, not step) — named by you as the cause of the worse tail on A4 and A5. *Rate:* ⚠ not obtained separately — currently only implicit in the one-in-ten tails.\n\n**A12 — Washdown fails the visual check, part redone** (event, not step) — named as the cause of the 4 h tail on A6. *Rate:* ⚠ not obtained separately.\n\n## Ordering / flow\n\n**F1 — The main arc, desk to dock** — **spelled out**, your six steps:\ndemand book → allocate to line → queue behind what's running (reorderable) → changeover if needed → run (mix, mill, tint-or-straight-through, fill, pack) → QA hold → release → stage → ship.\n\n**F2 — Order-to-batch split** — an order may become two batches run at different times. *Decided by:* you, on run size or urgency-interleaving. — **spelled out as a rule**; the *cost* of a split (extra changeovers, extra loss) ⚠ never asked.\n\n**F3 — Which changeover applies** — selected by (family currently on the line, family of the next batch, line). Same family → A4. White→tint → A5. Tint→white → A6. Into/out of specialty → A7. — **spelled out**\n\n## Policies\n\n**P1 — \"Meridian whites always go to Line 2, that's just how it's done here\"** — *practiced.* Overrides: ⚠ none asked. — **spelled out**\n\n**P2 — Meridian on-time is absolute** — \"we don't even try to be clever about it\". *Rationale:* fine, plus tracked on-time % and a delisting threat that has been carried out on a competitor. *Overrides:* none — that's the point. — **spelled out**\n\n**P3 — Who gets the tech when two lines want one** — *practiced, and there is no prescribed form:* \"there's no posted rule at all.\"\n- The rule as practiced: whichever line has the **more time-sensitive order behind it** wins; if that's a tie, **whichever changeover is faster** wins, \"so you get a line moving sooner\". In the room it resolves as \"whoever's louder at the huddle, or whoever's about to actually run dry\".\n- *Borderline case on record:* Line 1 and Line 3 both wanted a washdown the same morning. Line 3 got the tech first because Line 3's was the quick one and Line 1's was the long tint→white slog anyway — knock out the fast one, get that line moving, then commit the tech to the long one. Line 1 sat clean-but-waiting ~40 minutes past when it could have started.\n- *What overrides it:* the ops director, who has overruled you once, wanting \"his pet SKU out the door\". — **spelled out**\n- *Rationale:* two techs, three lines, so \"the crew's a shared resource and sometimes there's a queue for them before the clock even starts on the line\" — that's the grief at the huddle, not changeover variability.\n\n**P4 — Reorder the queue so a job doesn't get stuck behind a big changeover** — *practiced, yours.* — **spelled out**; overrides ⚠ not asked.\n\n**P5 — Hold the line for an anticipated same-family order** — the decision under test. As practiced two weeks ago: on a heads-up that a same-family white was about to drop, let Line 2 sit idle ~1 h rather than wash down to the waiting tint, to save a full washdown. Your own account: \"I was guessing.\" — **spelled out as an instance**; the trigger condition (B2) and the decision threshold are ⚠.\n\n**P6 — Batch split discretion** — \"I have the freedom to split if I need to.\" — **spelled out**\n\n## Constraints\n\n**C1 — Line qualification** — Line 1 qualified for everything including specialty; Line 3 qualified product-by-product, \"can't run everything yet\"; Line 2 ⚠ never stated. *Consequence when hit:* the batch can't go on that line. — **partially spelled out** ⚠\n\n**C2 — Two techs, three lines** — *consequence when hit:* one line waits, clean-but-idle (40 min in the case on record). — **spelled out**\n\n**C3 — Tint → white requires a full washdown with a passing visual check** — *consequence:* pigment left behind ruins a white batch. — **spelled out**\n\n**C4 — Meridian must leave our dock a day ahead of the dock appointment** — *consequence:* fine + on-time % + delisting exposure. — **spelled out**\n\n**C5 — Every batch goes through QA hold before release** — *consequence:* no batch ships unreleased. — **spelled out**\n\n## Dynamics\n\n**None.** Nothing you described evolves continuously while nothing discrete happens. Soak time inside A6 is dead time within an activity, not a state variable that crosses a threshold. I am deliberately not inventing one.\n\n## Data bindings *(named only — these project to nothing today)*\n\nChangeover logs (tech start/finish per changeover — the check on ledger #1 and #2); ERP demand book (B1 arrival pattern); QA release timestamps (A9); Meridian on-time percentage (O2). — **named**\n\n## Validation criteria\n\n⚠ **None obtained.** I never asked how you'd know the model was right. It belongs at the top of the next session, next to run times.\n\n---\n\n# 2. Assumption ledger\n\nEverything here is mine, not yours.\n\n| # | Assumption | Why | How to check |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 1 | Line 1 changeover durations = Line 2 × 1.2, all types | You said Line 1 is \"fussier to get properly clean\" and, when I proposed 20%, that it \"sounds about right, not double\" — but you explicitly could not swear the minutes. The 1.2 factor is mine. | Changeover logs, if techs record start and finish; compare Line 1 vs Line 2 for the same family pair. |\n| 2 | Line 3 changeover durations = Line 2 | You said Line 3 has no war stories and \"you're stuck assuming it's like Line 1 or Line 2 until we've got more history\". Choosing Line 2 rather than Line 1 is mine. | As #1, once Line 3 has run enough different products. |\n| 3 | \"An hour and a bit\" (A5 worse) = 70 min; \"4, maybe a bit more\" (A6 worse) = 4.5 h | Numeric reading of your words so the spread is usable. | Ask you to confirm or correct the two figures. |\n| 4 | Crew hands-on fractions: A4 = 1.0 (yours, stated); A5 = 0.8; A6 = 0.5; A7 = 0.8 | You said \"most of it\", \"maybe half of that\", \"most of that\". A6's 0.5 is close to your words; the two 0.8s are mine. | Changeover logs vs. tech time records; or ask the techs directly. |\n| 5 | No changeover happens outside day shift | You said \"two techs on day shift covering all three lines\". Whether there's any other coverage was never asked. | One question to you. |\n| 6 | Every batch's changeover requires exactly one tech (not two) | You always spoke of \"the tech\" singular. | One question to you. |\n| 7 | A6's redo-after-failed-visual-check is inside the 4 h tail rather than a separate event with its own rate | Simplification so the spread stands alone; you described it as the *cause* of the tail. | Ask how often the visual check fails first time. |\n\n---\n\n# 3. What this model leaves out, and what's still unknown\n\n**Deliberately left out.**\n- **Queues and waiting states** are not modelled as things in their own right — the wait behind a running batch, the wait for a tech, the wait in QA hold. They fall out of the activities either side of them. The 40-minute clean-but-waiting on Line 1 is a *result* the model should produce, not an input.\n- **The commercial layer** — the fine, the on-time percentage, the delisting mechanism. C4 and O2 encode the hard deadline; the money behind it is out of scope because it's out of your sight.\n- **Who ran which changeover** — the two techs are interchangeable, since you drew no distinction between them.\n\n**Things the model cannot carry, that I'm keeping in words so they aren't lost.**\n- **O4, \"how ugly the sheet looks.\"** A real criterion you use, explicitly not a number. It can be approximated as line idle hours, but that approximation is mine, not yours, and I haven't made it.\n- **The O2/O3/lateness trade-off weight.** Genuinely unquantified, with the source named: commercial. Without it, the model can report changeover hours and lateness separately but cannot rank two schedules that trade one for the other.\n- **The huddle.** \"Whoever's louder at the huddle\" and the ops director's pet-SKU override are the real P3 in the room. The triage logic you gave me — time-sensitivity first, faster-changeover as tiebreak — is compilable; loudness and the override are not, and any run of this model will be *quieter and more rational* than your plant. That gap is worth remembering when the results look tidy.\n- **Ledger #1–#4** are load-bearing for any result involving Line 1 or Line 3. Right now O1 is only genuinely answerable for Line 2.\n\n**Open slots, in the order I'd close them.**\n1. **A8 run duration** — nothing at all, per family and per line, as a spread. O1 asks about a week; run time is most of a week.\n2. **B2, the drop-in and the heads-up** — how the warning reaches you, how far ahead, and how often it's right. P5 is the decision under test and its trigger is currently an anecdote.\n3. **A9 QA hold** — \"a few hours\" is a figure at the wrong precision. And whether the lab is a shared resource with a queue, like the techs — because by your own account that's where lateness actually comes from.\n4. **B1** — orders per weekly pull, and the within-week shape.\n5. **E2 / F2** — typical run sizes, and what a split actually costs in extra changeovers.\n6. **B5 / C1** — which SKUs Line 3 is qualified for, and whether Line 2 has restrictions.\n7. **Breakage and interruptions** — you mentioned \"the mill motor issue\" in passing as an example of something structurally different. I never asked what breaks, how often, or for how long.\n8. **Validation** — how you'd know the model is right.\n\n**One caution on the format.** I've built the model; the Petri-net scaffold and the code obligations are derived from it by the tooling, not written by me. I'm not claiming this loads or runs as-is — the run-duration hole alone would stop it." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "*(No dialogue — Marta has left for the huddle. This turn is a silent acknowledgment beat only if the interviewer expects a reply; otherwise nothing further is added.)*" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "Nothing further from me — you've stopped, and the read-back above is the deliverable as it stands.\n\nFor when you're back, the first three questions in one place, so you can answer them in five minutes if that's all you have:\n\n1. **How long does a batch run?** Typical, one-in-ten worse, one-in-ten better — for a plain white on Line 2 first; I'll ask about the other families and lines after.\n2. **The heads-up.** Two weeks ago, who told you that white order was about to drop, how far ahead, and how often does that kind of warning turn out to be right?\n3. **QA hold.** \"A few hours\" — typical, one-in-ten worse, one-in-ten better. And is there a queue for the lab like there is for the techs?\n\nEnjoy the huddle." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "*(Marta has stepped away to the huddle — no further reply expected this turn. The three questions are noted for the next session.)*" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "Noted — session closed. The model, the seven-item assumption ledger, and the eight open slots stand as delivered above; the three questions are queued for next time." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Understood — nothing further needed from me here. Session closed, deliverables stand as written, and I'll pick up run times, the heads-up mechanism, and QA hold as the first order of business next time we talk." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "Acknowledged. Session closed on your terms.\n\nFor the record, so nothing depends on memory next time:\n\n- **Delivered:** the model (4 objectives, 5 entity types, 5 boundary conditions, 12 activities, 3 ordering/flow rules, 6 policies, 5 constraints, no dynamics, 4 named data bindings), the 7-entry assumption ledger, and the loss account.\n- **Queued, in order:** A8 run duration → B2 the heads-up mechanism → A9 QA hold and whether the lab queues.\n- **Standing caveat:** O1 — hold versus wash down — is currently answerable only for Line 2, and only once run times exist. Ledger #1–#4 are the assumptions to attack first if a result involving Line 1 or Line 3 ever looks decisive.\n\nThanks for the time, Marta — the changeover asymmetry and the tech-contention story were the two things I'd never have got from a document." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Anytime. Glad the changeover asymmetry landed — that one catches everybody, including people who've been on the floor a lot longer than me. Come find me at the huddle when you're ready to go through run times, I'll have my head in the sheet anyway." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "Will do — I'll come to the huddle rather than pull you out of it. If your head's in the sheet anyway, that's the best possible place to ask about run times: I'd rather hear \"that one took nine hours and it was a bad one\" off the actual sheet than a remembered average.\n\nOne small ask for whenever it's convenient, no work required now: if the changeover logs do have tech start and finish times on them, that's the single thing that would let me retire ledger entries #1 and #4 — the Line 1 scaling factor and the crew hands-on fractions — and swap my guesses for your history.\n\nSee you at the huddle." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Sounds good — I'll flag it to the two techs to make sure they're actually filling in start/finish consistently, because I'll be honest, I've never audited that field myself, I mostly just glance at duration. If it's patchy for Line 1 and Line 3 specifically, that itself would be useful for you to know, not just an inconvenience. See you at the huddle." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "That's a genuinely useful thing to have said, and I'm recording it rather than just noting it — it changes the status of a data binding I'd been leaning on.\n\n**Amendment to the delivered model:**\n\n- **Data binding \"changeover logs (tech start/finish)\"** — provenance qualified: the start/finish field has never been audited; you read duration only. Coverage is unknown and may be patchy, and you've flagged Line 1 and Line 3 as the places to look. Your words: \"I've never audited that field myself, I mostly just glance at duration.\"\n- **Consequence for the ledger:** entries #1 (Line 1 × 1.2) and #4 (crew hands-on fractions) each carry a second-order dependency — their check depends on a feed of unverified coverage. If the field turns out patchy exactly where the assumptions bite, those two stay assumptions and the honest move is to widen them rather than to fill them in.\n- **Recorded as a finding in its own right:** patchy logging on Line 1 and Line 3 is itself evidence about the plant, not just an obstacle to the model.\n\nNothing else changes. See you at the huddle." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Fair enough — that's a better way to put it than I would have. Talk soon." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "Talk soon, Marta." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "See you at the huddle." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "See you there." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "*(end of session — nothing further to add.)*" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "Session ended. Deliverables stand as written above." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Confirmed — nothing further from this end. Session closed." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "Closed. Nothing further." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Closed." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "Closed." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "I really do have to stop here. Please produce the model now with everything you have." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "# Coatings Plant Scheduling Model\n**Elicited from:** Marta, master scheduler\n**Job:** construct (no prior model)\n**Status at close:** floor satisfied; O1's dependency slice **incomplete** — see §3.\n**Vocabulary:** the expert's throughout. `⚠` = a slot the method demands and the interview did not obtain.\n\n---\n\n## 1. The model\n\n### 1.1 Objectives\n\n**O1 — \"Hold the line versus wash it down now, which one actually costs less over the week\"**\n- **The question, in her words** *(spelled out)*: whether letting Line 2 sit idle for about an hour, on a heads-up that another same-family white order is about to drop in from a distributor, is cheaper over a week than washing down now to run the tint batch waiting behind it. Origin: a real Thursday-afternoon decision two weeks before the interview. Her own verdict on how she made it: *\"I was guessing.\"*\n- **Depends on** *(≥1 satisfied)*: E1, E2, E3, E4, B1, B2, A4, A5, A6, A8, A9, F1, F2, P3, P4, P5, C1, C2, C3.\n- **What \"better\" means** *(named; not quantified)*: changeover hours consumed over the week, subject to O2 holding absolutely. ⚠ no trade-off weight against lateness — see the trade-off note below.\n- **Source-regime**: practiced.\n\n**O2 — \"Whether Meridian shipped on time, full stop, that's non-negotiable\"**\n- **The question** *(spelled out)*: does every Meridian order leave the dock in time for its dock appointment.\n- **\"On time\" defined** *(spelled out)*: a ship date given on the order, usually with a delivery window attached — a specific dock appointment at Meridian's end. In practice the batch must leave our dock **one day ahead** to allow for freight. Not \"shipped this week.\"\n- **Consequence of a miss** *(spelled out, unquantified)*: a fine — *\"I don't see the number, that's commercial's problem, but I hear about it\"* — and, worse, Meridian tracks our on-time percentage and threatens to delist SKUs if it drops too far. A competitor has been delisted, *\"so it's not an empty threat, and it's why the rule is absolute — we don't even try to be clever about it.\"* ⚠ fine amount and delisting threshold both outside her sight.\n- **Depends on**: A8, A9, A10, B3, C4, C5, P1, P2.\n- **Source-regime**: prescribed and practiced coincide — she reports no divergence, which is itself the finding.\n\n**O3 — Changeover hours**\n- **The question** *(spelled out)*: how many crew-hours go into washing down rather than filling. *\"Every hour the crew spends washing down is an hour not filling anything.\"*\n- **Depends on**: A4, A5, A6, A7, E4, C2, P3.\n- **What \"better\" means** *(named)*: fewer changeover hours. Directionally clear, no target value. ⚠\n\n**O4 — \"How ugly the sheet looks\"**\n- **The question** *(spelled out)*: *\"are there gaps where a line's sitting idle for no good reason.\"*\n- **What \"better\" means** *(her words; explicitly not a number)*: *\"that last one's not a number, it's more a gut check, but it's real.\"*\n- **Depends on**: E3, C2, P3, P4, A4–A7.\n- **Status**: recorded, IR-only. Approximating it as line idle hours would be my move, not hers; I have not made it. See §3.\n\n**The trade-off between O2, O3 and non-Meridian lateness** *(spelled out as a rule; deliberately unquantified)*\nFour changeover hours saved against one distributor order two days late: *\"honestly, yes, I'd take that trade most of the time\"* — a distributor slip is *\"usually just an annoyed phone call from our sales rep, not a fine.\"* But *\"'most of the time' is doing a lot of work in that sentence\"*: the same distributor slipping three weeks running starts asking for a discount. So lateness for non-Meridian is soft but not infinitely soft, and the softness decays with repetition on the same customer.\n**Deposit for the missing number**: *\"that's genuinely a 'sit down with commercial' conversation, nobody's ever made me quantify it.\"* Source named; not obtainable from the scheduler. ⚠\n\n---\n\n### 1.2 Entity types\n\n**E1 — Order (in the demand book)**\n- **Distinctions the process treats apart** *(spelled out)*: Meridian vs. non-Meridian — a Meridian flag arrives on the order and it *\"jumps to the top of my attention\"*; family classification (see below), which drives allocation and changeover.\n- **State riding along** *(spelled out)*: SKU; quantity; due date with delivery window; Meridian flag; family — **base white / tinted colour / specialty clear**. The family is a real field: *\"that's not my judgment, that's how the SKU's classified in the system, it drives what changeover you need going in and out.\"*\n- **How many / population shape**: ⚠ not obtained. Orders per weekly pull and within-week shape unknown.\n\n**E2 — Batch**\n- **Distinctions** *(spelled out)*: inherits the family of the order it came from.\n- **Relationship to E1** *(spelled out)*: *\"mostly the order is the batch, if it fits a reasonable run size.\"* Split into two batches run at different times when a distributor orders more than makes sense in a single run, or to interleave something more urgent. *\"Order-to-batch most of the time, but not a strict one-to-one — I have the freedom to split if I need to.\"*\n- **How many / population shape**: ⚠ not obtained. Run sizes, \"reasonable run size\" threshold, and the cost of a split all unelicited.\n\n**E3 — Line** *(a contended resource: capacity in C1, contention in P1/P3, availability in B4)*\n- **Distinctions** *(spelled out)*:\n - **Line 1** — *\"the old workhorse — slower but it's qualified for everything, including specialty.\"* Crew report it is *\"fussier to get properly clean.\"*\n - **Line 2** — *\"the fast one, that's your big-volume runner.\"* Meridian whites always go here (P1).\n - **Line 3** — *\"the newest and quickest, but it's still being qualified product by product, so it can't run everything yet\"*; so far *\"mostly one or two SKUs.\"*\n- **State riding along** *(spelled out)*: the family the line is currently dirty with — this selects which changeover applies (F3); the line's qualification set.\n- **How many** *(number)*: 3.\n\n**E4 — Changeover tech** *(a contended resource)*\n- **Distinctions** *(named)*: none drawn between the two techs; treated as interchangeable.\n- **State riding along** *(spelled out)*: which line they are currently committed to. Can be *\"pulled away partway through\"* a changeover, and during long soaks *\"might duck off to start something on another line.\"*\n- **How many** *(number)*: 2 on day shift, covering all three lines. *\"That's it. No dedicated tech per line.\"*\n\n**E5 — QA lab**\n- ⚠ **Nothing obtained** beyond its existence, that every batch passes through it, and that it *\"gets backed up on a Friday afternoon.\"* Whether it is a contended resource with a queue — as she suspects and I flagged — is open.\n- Recorded because her own diagnosis makes it load-bearing for O2: *\"half the time a 'late' order was actually sitting done in QA hold waiting for the lab to get to it.\"*\n\n---\n\n### 1.3 Boundary conditions\n\n**B1 — ERP weekly pull into the demand book**\n- **Starting state** *(spelled out)*: orders come over from ERP on the weekly pull carrying SKU, quantity, due date, Meridian flag.\n- **Arrival pattern**: ⚠ **not obtained** (demanded as a spread). No volume, no variability, no within-week shape.\n\n**B2 — Mid-week drop-in order, and the heads-up that precedes it**\n- ⚠ **Not obtained** (demanded as a spread). All that exists is the single anecdote: *\"I had a heads-up another same-family white order was about to drop in from a distributor.\"*\n- **Why this matters more than its size suggests**: this is the trigger on which O1's entire decision hangs. Who gives the heads-up, how far ahead, and how often it proves right are all unknown. Without it, P5 can be simulated as a *rule* but its *arrival process* has no basis.\n\n**B3 — Meridian dock appointment**\n- **Pattern** *(spelled out, qualitative)*: a ship date with a delivery window on the order, resolving to a specific dock appointment at Meridian's end.\n- **Lead-time distribution**: ⚠ not obtained.\n\n**B4 — Tech availability**\n- **Spelled out, partially**: two techs on **day shift**. ⚠ Whether any changeover coverage exists outside day shift was never asked (ledger #5).\n\n**B5 — Line 3 qualification set**\n- ⚠ *\"mostly one or two SKUs\"* — **not spelled out**; which SKUs, unknown.\n\n---\n\n### 1.4 Activities\n\n**A1 — Lands in the demand book**\n- *Needs*: the weekly ERP pull. *Produces*: an order in the demand book, Meridian-flagged or not. *Performed by*: ERP — unattended. *Duration*: instantaneous receipt. *Rate*: per B1 ⚠. *Mode-change loss*: n/a. *Varies by type*: no. **spelled out**\n\n**A2 — Allocate to a line**\n- *Needs*: an order in the book. *Produces*: order assigned to a line. *Performed by*: Marta. *Duration*: not a constraint on the schedule; for Meridian whites *\"that's not really a decision.\"* *Rule*: P1. **spelled out**\n\n**A3 — Reorder the queue**\n- *Needs*: an order sitting behind others on a line. *Produces*: a changed run sequence. *Performed by*: Marta. *Rule*: P4 — *\"sometimes I'll reorder things a bit so it doesn't get stuck behind a big changeover.\"* **spelled out**\n\n**A4 — Quick rinse, same family (white → white), Line 2**\n- *Needs*: previous batch off; a tech available; next SKU in the same family. *Produces*: line clean, *\"the fill head's actually running clean product again.\"*\n- *Performed by* **(named)**: one changeover tech.\n- *Duration, line down* **(spread)**: **typical 25 min**; **one-in-ten worse 45 min** — *\"usually because the tech's tied up finishing something on another line first and there's a wait before they even start on Line 2\"*; **one-in-ten better 15 min** — *\"if the tech's standing right there and it's a genuinely easy one.\"*\n- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out)**: identical to line-down. *\"It's quick enough that the tech's on it start to finish, no gap between 'crew starts' and 'line stops.'\"*\n- *Mode-change loss*: this activity **is** the mode change; the loss is the duration above.\n- *Varies by type* **(named)**: yes by family-pair (F3 selects between A4–A7). By line: ⚠ ledger #1, #2.\n\n**A5 — Family switch, white → tint, Line 2** — *\"the easier direction\"*\n- *Needs / produces*: as A4, next batch in a different family.\n- *Performed by* **(named)**: one changeover tech.\n- *Duration, line down* **(spread)**: **typical 45 min**; **worse \"an hour and a bit\"** — *\"if the tech gets pulled away partway through\"*; **better ~30 min** — *\"if everything's staged.\"* (Numeric reading of \"an hour and a bit\": ledger #3.)\n- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative)**: *\"the tech's hands-on for most of it — this one doesn't have much soak-and-wait, it's mostly just doing the work.\"* Fraction: ledger #4.\n- *Varies by type*: direction-dependent — see A6.\n\n**A6 — Family switch, tint → white, Line 2 — the full washdown** — *\"the ugly one\"*\n- *Needs*: as A5, plus a **passing visual check** before the line is released back to production.\n- *Produces*: a line clean enough to run white.\n- *Performed by* **(named)**: one changeover tech, not continuously present.\n- *Duration, line down* **(spread)**: **typical ~3 h**; **worse 4 h, \"maybe a bit more\"** — *\"if it doesn't pass the visual check first time and they have to redo part of it\"*; **better ~2 h** — *\"a clean fast one, if the crew's good and nothing complicates it.\"* (Ledger #3 for the numeric reading of the tail.)\n- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative)**: *\"less than the 3 hours suggests — there's real soak and rinse-cycle time where the tech's not standing there, they might duck off to start something on another line. I'd guess they're actually working maybe half of that.\"* Note her own hedge — *\"I'd guess\"* — carried into ledger #4.\n- *Rationale* **(spelled out)**: *\"any pigment left behind ruins a white batch, so it's a full washdown.\"*\n- **Asymmetry is load-bearing**: white→tint ≠ tint→white. *\"It absolutely depends on direction — that's the thing people forget… it is absolutely not symmetric, and it trips people up if they assume it is.\"*\n\n**A7 — Changeover into / out of specialty clear, Line 1**\n- *Needs / produces*: as A5/A6, for the specialty family. Only Line 1 is qualified (C1).\n- *Performed by* **(named)**: one changeover tech.\n- *Duration, line down* **(spread)**: **typical 2 h**, *\"roughly the same both directions, unlike white/tint\"*; **worse 3 h**, *\"if it's coming out of clear and they're being extra careful about residue, since clear can be sneaky — you don't always see it the way you'd see pigment\"*; **better 1.5 h**, *\"a quick swap and the line was already fairly clean.\"*\n- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative)**: *\"most of that — specialty doesn't have the long soak cycles the tint-to-white washdown has, it's more just physically thorough cleaning because the product's thick and clingy.\"* Fraction: ledger #4.\n\n**A8 — Run the batch** — mix, mill, tint (or *\"straight through if it's a plain white\"*), fill, pack\n- *Needs* **(spelled out)**: a clean line in the right family state; the batch released to run.\n- *Produces* **(spelled out)**: a filled and packed batch.\n- *Performed by*: ⚠ line operators never elicited as a resource.\n- **Duration**: ⚠ **nothing obtained.** Demanded as a spread, per family and per line.\n- *Varies by type*: partially — *\"for a white that's usually the more straightforward path\"* (skips the tint step), but no durations attach to that.\n- **This is the largest hole in the model.** O1 asks a question about a week; run time is most of a week.\n\n**A9 — QA hold and release** — *\"every batch does\"*\n- *Needs*: a packed batch. *Produces*: a released batch.\n- *Performed by* **(named)**: the lab (E5).\n- **Duration**: *\"typically a few hours before it's released\"* — an honest **number at the wrong precision**; demanded as a **spread**. ⚠\n- *Failure path*: ⚠ never asked what happens to a batch that fails QA.\n- *Known pathology* **(spelled out, qualitative; rate ⚠)**: *\"if QA's backed up on a Friday afternoon, that's where it actually goes sideways, not on the line.\"* And: *\"the QA step is the one people don't think about when they're mad at scheduling; half the time a 'late' order was actually sitting done in QA hold waiting for the lab to get to it.\"*\n\n**A10 — Stage for shipping, and ship**\n- *Needs*: QA release. *Produces*: the order off the dock. *Timing constraint*: C4 — *\"that's when the truck appointment matters.\"*\n- *Duration*: ⚠ not obtained.\n\n**A11 — Tech pulled away mid-changeover** *(event, not step)*\n- Named by her as the mechanism behind the worse tail of A4 (*\"the tech's tied up finishing something on another line\"*) and A5 (*\"if the tech gets pulled away partway through\"*).\n- *Rate*: ⚠ not obtained separately; currently only implicit inside the one-in-ten tails of A4 and A5. Per P01 this should be its own rate and duration.\n\n**A12 — Washdown fails the visual check, part redone** *(event, not step)*\n- Named as the mechanism behind A6's 4 h tail.\n- *Rate*: ⚠ not obtained separately. Ledger #7 records the simplification.\n\n**A13 — \"The mill motor issue\"** *(event, not step — named in passing, nothing more)*\n- Mentioned only as an example of what a *structural* difference between lines would look like, in contrast to Line 1 merely being fussier. Recorded so it is not lost; **rate ⚠, duration ⚠, consequence ⚠**. This is the whole of the breakdown/interruption stratum, which was never swept.\n\n---\n\n### 1.5 Ordering / flow\n\n**F1 — The main arc, desk to dock** *(spelled out — her six steps, verbatim in structure)*\n1. Lands in the demand book (ERP weekly pull; SKU, quantity, due date, Meridian flag).\n2. Allocated to a line (*\"Meridian whites always go to Line 2\"*).\n3. Sits in the queue behind whatever's running — reorderable (A3/P4).\n4. Changeover if needed (F3 selects which), then it runs: mix, mill, tint-or-straight-through, fill, pack.\n5. QA hold.\n6. Released, staged for shipping, out against the truck appointment.\n\n**F2 — Order-to-batch split**\n- *Order* **(spelled out)**: an order becomes one batch by default; it may become two batches run at different times.\n- *How the branch is decided* **(spelled out)**: Marta's judgment, on either (a) a distributor ordering *\"more than makes sense in a single run\"*, or (b) needing to interleave something more urgent.\n- *Cost of a split*: ⚠ never asked (P03 unresolved) — extra changeovers and any extra loss are unknown.\n\n**F3 — Which changeover applies** *(spelled out)*\nSelected by the triple (family currently on the line, family of the next batch, line):\n- same family → **A4** quick rinse\n- white → tint → **A5**\n- tint → white → **A6** full washdown\n- into or out of specialty clear → **A7** (Line 1 only)\n\n---\n\n### 1.6 Policies\n\n**P1 — \"Meridian whites always go to Line 2, that's just how it's done here\"**\n- *As practiced* **(spelled out)**: fixed allocation, not a decision.\n- *What overrides it*: ⚠ never asked.\n- *Source-regime*: practiced; no prescribed form offered.\n\n**P2 — Meridian on-time is absolute**\n- *As practiced* **(spelled out)**: *\"the rule is absolute — we don't even try to be clever about it.\"*\n- *What overrides it* **(spelled out)**: nothing. That is the content of the policy.\n- *Rationale*: fine, tracked on-time percentage, delisting threat carried out on a competitor.\n\n**P3 — Who gets the tech when two lines want one** *(the model's richest policy, and the least documented)*\n- **Prescribed form: none exists.** *\"There's no posted rule at all.\"*\n- **As practiced** *(spelled out)*: in the room it resolves as *\"whoever's louder at the huddle, or whoever's about to actually run dry.\"* Pressed for the underlying logic: *\"it's mostly gut triage: whichever line has the more time-sensitive order behind it wins, and if that's a tie, whichever changeover is faster wins so you get a line moving sooner.\"*\n- **Borderline case on record** *(the practiced rule demonstrated, per P05)*: Line 1 and Line 3 both wanted a washdown the same morning. **Line 3 got the tech first** — *\"not because it was more important, but because Line 3's changeover was the quick one and Line 1's was going to be the long tint-to-white slog anyway, so the thinking was 'knock out the fast one, get that line moving, then commit the tech to the long one.'\"* Line 1 sat **clean-but-waiting for almost 40 minutes** past when it could have started.\n- **What overrides it** *(spelled out)*: the ops director. *\"I've been overruled by the ops director once when he wanted his pet SKU out the door.\"*\n- *Rationale* **(spelled out)**: *\"the crew's a shared resource and sometimes there's a queue for them before the clock even starts on the line\"* — and this, not changeover variability, is *\"the bit that actually causes grief at the huddle.\"*\n\n**P4 — Reorder the queue so a job isn't stuck behind a big changeover**\n- *As practiced* **(spelled out)**: Marta reorders *\"a bit\"* to avoid a job landing behind an expensive changeover.\n- *What overrides it*: ⚠ never asked.\n\n**P5 — Hold the line for an anticipated same-family order** *(the decision under test)*\n- *As practiced, one instance* **(spelled out)**: on a heads-up that a same-family white was about to drop, let Line 2 sit idle for *\"maybe an hour\"* rather than wash down for the tint waiting behind, *\"because doing them back to back would save us a full washdown.\"*\n- *Her own epistemic status*: *\"I was guessing.\"* Her boss's challenge — *\"are you sure that's worth it, or are you just guessing?\"* — is the reason this model exists.\n- *Trigger condition and decision threshold*: ⚠ how strong a heads-up, and how long she'd hold, are not generalised beyond this instance. Depends on B2.\n\n**P6 — Batch-split discretion**\n- *As practiced* **(spelled out)**: *\"I have the freedom to split if I need to.\"* Criteria as in F2.\n- *What overrides it*: ⚠ never asked.\n\n---\n\n### 1.7 Constraints\n\n**C1 — Line qualification**\n- *The limit* **(partially spelled out)**: Line 1 qualified for everything including specialty. Line 3 qualified product-by-product, *\"can't run everything yet\"*, currently *\"mostly one or two SKUs\"* — which ones ⚠. Line 2's qualification set ⚠ never stated.\n- *What happens when it's hit* **(spelled out)**: the batch cannot go on that line.\n\n**C2 — Two techs, three lines**\n- *The limit* **(spelled out)**: 2 techs on day shift for 3 lines.\n- *What happens when it's hit* **(spelled out)**: *\"if Line 1 and Line 3 both want a washdown at the same time, one of them waits\"* — clean-but-idle; 40 minutes in the case on record. Resolution by P3.\n\n**C3 — Tint → white requires a full washdown passing a visual check**\n- *The limit* **(spelled out)**: a white batch may not run on a line still carrying pigment.\n- *What happens when it's hit* **(spelled out)**: *\"any pigment left behind ruins a white batch\"*; a failed visual check means part of the washdown is redone (A12).\n\n**C4 — Meridian must leave our dock a day ahead of the appointment**\n- *The limit* **(spelled out)**: shipped in time to hit the dock appointment, which *\"usually means it needs to leave our dock a day ahead for freight.\"*\n- *What happens when it's hit* **(spelled out)**: fine + on-time percentage damage + delisting exposure.\n\n**C5 — Every batch passes QA hold before release**\n- *The limit* **(spelled out)**: *\"every batch does.\"*\n- *What happens when it's hit* **(spelled out)**: nothing ships unreleased; the batch waits in hold.\n\n**Unwritten constraints**: ⚠ the closing sweep — *\"what would a newcomer get wrong in the first week?\"*, *\"which rule exists because something once went wrong?\"* — was never run. The one item that surfaced unprompted is the changeover asymmetry: *\"that one catches everybody, including people who've been on the floor a lot longer than me.\"*\n\n---\n\n### 1.8 Dynamics\n\n**None.** Nothing described evolves continuously while nothing discrete happens. The soak and rinse-cycle time inside A6 is dead time *within* an activity, not a state variable crossing a threshold, and I have deliberately not promoted it to one.\n\n---\n\n### 1.9 Data bindings *(named only; these project to nothing today)*\n\n| Feed | Would drive | Provenance |\n|---|---|---|\n| Changeover logs — tech start/finish per changeover | A4–A7 durations and crew hands-on fractions; retires ledger #1 and #4 | **Qualified**: *\"I've never audited that field myself, I mostly just glance at duration.\"* Coverage unknown, possibly patchy — Marta named **Line 1 and Line 3** as where to look. She will flag it to the two techs. |\n| ERP demand book | B1 arrival pattern, B2 | not discussed |\n| QA release timestamps | A9 duration and lab queueing | not discussed |\n| Meridian on-time percentage | O2 | tracked by Meridian, visible to commercial |\n\n**Finding, recorded in its own right**: patchy changeover logging concentrated on Lines 1 and 3 is evidence about the plant, not merely an obstacle to the model. Her words: *\"if it's patchy for Line 1 and Line 3 specifically, that itself would be useful for you to know, not just an inconvenience.\"*\n\n---\n\n### 1.10 Validation criteria\n\n⚠ **None obtained.** How Marta would know the model is right was never asked. Queued.\n\n---\n\n## 2. Assumption ledger\n\nEverything here is mine. None of it is hers.\n\n| # | Assumption | Why it was made | How to check it |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| **1** | Line 1 changeover durations = Line 2 × **1.2**, all four types | She could not give Line 1 minutes: *\"I couldn't swear the minutes are identical… Line 1's older, the crew sometimes says it's fussier.\"* I proposed 20%; she said *\"20% sounds about right, not double.\"* **The 1.2 factor originated with me** — her assent is not authorship. | Changeover logs, Line 1 vs Line 2, same family-pair. **Blocked by the unaudited start/finish field, and Line 1 is one of the two lines she expects to be patchy.** |\n| **2** | Line 3 changeover durations = Line 2, unscaled | *\"Line 3 I genuinely don't have a good feel for… you're stuck assuming it's like Line 1 or Line 2 until we've got more history.\"* She offered the disjunction; **choosing Line 2 was mine.** | As #1, once Line 3 has run more products. Also expected patchy. |\n| **3** | \"An hour and a bit\" (A5 worse) = **70 min**; \"4, maybe a bit more\" (A6 worse) = **4.5 h** | Numeric readings so the spreads are usable. | One question to Marta: confirm or correct both. |\n| **4** | Crew hands-on fractions: A4 = **1.0**; A5 = **0.8**; A6 = **0.5**; A7 = **0.8** | A4's 1.0 is hers, stated. A6's 0.5 is close to *\"maybe half of that\"* — but note her own hedge, *\"I'd guess.\"* **The two 0.8s from *\"most of it\"* / *\"most of that\"* are mine.** | Changeover logs vs. tech time records, or ask the two techs directly. Same blocker as #1. |\n| **5** | No changeover happens outside day shift | She said *\"two techs on **day shift** covering all three lines.\"* Whether any other coverage exists was never asked. | One question to Marta. |\n| **6** | A changeover requires exactly **one** tech, not two | She spoke of *\"the tech\"* singular throughout, including for the 3-hour washdown. | One question to Marta or the techs. |\n| **7** | A12 (failed visual check, part redone) is folded **inside** A6's 4 h tail rather than modelled as a separate event with its own rate and duration | She described it as *the cause of* the tail, not as an independent event. Keeps the spread self-contained. Contrary to P01, which would separate rate from duration. | Ask how often the visual check fails first time; if it's common, split it out. |\n| **8** | The two changeover techs are **interchangeable** | She drew no distinction between them. | One question to Marta. |\n\n**Second-order note on #1 and #4**: their stated check depends on a feed of unverified coverage, concentrated exactly where the assumptions bite. If the field proves patchy on Line 1, the honest move is to **widen** these assumptions, not to fill them in.\n\n---\n\n## 3. What the model leaves out, what is unknown, and why\n\n### 3.1 Deliberately left out\n\n- **Queues, buffers and waiting states are not nodes.** The wait behind a running batch, the wait for a tech, the wait in QA hold — none is elicited as a thing in itself; each is implied by the activities either side and emerges in projection. The 40-minute clean-but-waiting on Line 1 is an *output* the model should reproduce, not an input to it.\n- **The commercial layer.** The fine, the on-time percentage mechanics, the delisting threshold. C4 and O2 encode the hard deadline; the money behind it is outside the scheduler's sight and she named commercial as the owner.\n- **Individual tech identity.** Ledger #8 — she drew no distinction.\n- **Scenarios.** Not elicited; they assemble from B1–B5 at simulation time.\n\n### 3.2 What the formalism cannot carry, kept in words so it is not lost\n\n- **O4, \"how ugly the sheet looks.\"** A criterion she genuinely uses and explicitly refuses to number. It could be approximated as line idle hours — but that approximation would be mine, and I have not made it.\n- **The O2/O3/lateness trade-off weight.** Deliberately unquantified with the source named (commercial). Consequence: the model can report changeover hours, Meridian lateness and distributor lateness **separately**, but cannot rank two schedules that trade one against another. That is a real limit on answering O1, since O1's \"costs less\" implicitly spans them.\n- **The decay of softness.** *\"The same distributor slipping late for the third week running\"* turning into a discount demand is a memory effect across weeks on a customer. Stated as a rule, unquantified, and not represented.\n- **The huddle.** *\"Whoever's louder at the huddle\"* and the ops director's pet-SKU override are the real P3 in the room. The triage logic — time-sensitivity first, faster-changeover as tiebreak — is compilable; loudness and the override are not. **Any run of this model will be quieter and more rational than the plant.** That is worth remembering when a result looks tidy.\n\n### 3.3 Open slots, in the order I would close them\n\n1. **A8 run duration** — nothing at all, per family and per line, as a spread. O1 is a question about a *week*; run time is most of a week. **Nothing about O1 is answerable until this exists.**\n2. **B2, the drop-in and the heads-up** — who tells her, how far ahead, how often it proves right. P5 is the decision under test and its trigger is currently a single anecdote.\n3. **A9 QA hold** — *\"a few hours\"* is honest at the wrong precision; and whether the lab queues like the techs do. By her own account this is where lateness actually comes from, so it bears directly on O2.\n4. **B1** — orders per weekly pull and the within-week shape.\n5. **E2 / F2** — typical run sizes, the \"reasonable run size\" threshold, and what a split costs in extra changeovers (P03).\n6. **C1 / B5** — which SKUs Line 3 is qualified for; whether Line 2 has restrictions.\n7. **Breakdowns and interruptions** — the whole stratum. A13 \"the mill motor issue\" is a name with no rate, duration or consequence. A11 and A12 need rate separated from duration (P01).\n8. **The unwritten-constraint sweep** and **validation criteria** — neither was run.\n\n### 3.4 Status against the completion criteria\n\n- **Static floor: satisfied** — 4 objectives, 5 entity types, 13 activities, 3 ordering/flow nodes.\n- **O2, O3: dependency slices substantially satisfied**, excepting A8 and A9 durations.\n- **O1: dependency slice incomplete.** A8 has no duration at all; B2 has no arrival pattern. O1 is currently **answerable only for Line 2**, and only once run times exist. Ledger #1–#4 are the first assumptions to attack if any result involving Line 1 or Line 3 ever looks decisive.\n- **O4: recorded, unsupported for quantitative use** by its own author's description.\n\n### 3.5 What I do not claim\n\nI have elicited a model, not built a net. The SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar and the typed loss report are derived from this model by the tooling's projection — I have not written them and I am not claiming this loads, compiles, or runs. The A8 hole alone would stop it.\n\n---\n\n*Elicited from Marta, master scheduler, in a single session ended at her stop. Three questions queued for resumption: run duration for a plain white on Line 2 (typical / one-in-ten worse / one-in-ten better); the heads-up mechanism behind B2; QA hold as a spread, and whether the lab queues.*" + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "I really do have to stop here. Please produce the model now with everything you have." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "# Coatings Plant Scheduling Model — final deliverable\n\n**Elicited from:** Marta, master scheduler\n**Job:** construct (no prior model existed)\n**Ended:** at the expert's stop. No new topics opened after it.\n**Status:** static floor satisfied; O2 and O3 near-complete; **O1's dependency slice incomplete** (see §4).\n**Convention:** every value is in Marta's vocabulary, with the precision actually obtained. `⚠` marks a slot the method demands and the interview did not get. Quoted text is hers.\n\n---\n\n## 1. The model\n\n### 1.1 Objectives\n\n**O1 — \"Hold the line versus wash it down now, which one actually costs less over the week\"**\n- *Question* **(spelled out)** — whether letting Line 2 sit idle about an hour, on a heads-up that another same-family white order is about to drop from a distributor, beats washing down now for the tint waiting behind. From a real Thursday two weeks before the interview. Her verdict on her own method: *\"I was guessing.\"*\n- *Depends on* — E1, E2, E3, E4, B1, B2, A4, A5, A6, A8, A9, F1, F2, F3, P3, P4, P5, C1, C2, C3.\n- *\"Better\"* **(named, not quantified)** — changeover hours over the week, subject to O2 holding absolutely. ⚠ no weight against lateness.\n- *Source-regime* — practiced.\n\n**O2 — \"Whether Meridian shipped on time, full stop, that's non-negotiable\"**\n- *Question* **(spelled out)** — does every Meridian order leave the dock in time for its appointment.\n- *\"On time\"* **(spelled out)** — a ship date on the order with a delivery window, resolving to a specific dock appointment at Meridian's end; in practice must leave our dock **one day ahead** for freight. *\"Not just 'shipped this week.'\"*\n- *Consequence of a miss* **(spelled out; unquantified ⚠)** — a fine, *\"I don't see the number, that's commercial's problem, but I hear about it\"*; and worse, a tracked on-time percentage with a delisting threat — *\"that's happened to a competitor of ours, so it's not an empty threat, and it's why the rule is absolute.\"*\n- *Depends on* — A8, A9, A10, B3, C4, C5, P1, P2.\n\n**O3 — Changeover hours**\n- *Question* **(spelled out)** — crew-hours spent washing down instead of filling: *\"every hour the crew spends washing down is an hour not filling anything.\"*\n- *Depends on* — A4, A5, A6, A7, E4, C2, P3.\n- *\"Better\"* **(named)** — fewer. Direction only; no target. ⚠\n\n**O4 — \"How ugly the sheet looks\"**\n- *Question* **(spelled out)** — *\"are there gaps where a line's sitting idle for no good reason.\"*\n- *\"Better\"* **(her words; explicitly not a number)** — *\"that last one's not a number, it's more a gut check, but it's real.\"*\n- *Depends on* — E3, C2, P3, P4, A4–A7. IR-only; see §3.\n\n**Trade-off among O2 / O3 / non-Meridian lateness** **(spelled out as a rule; deliberately unquantified ⚠)** — four changeover hours against one distributor order two days late: *\"honestly, yes, I'd take that trade most of the time\"*, a slip being *\"an annoyed phone call from our sales rep, not a fine.\"* But *\"'most of the time' is doing a lot of work in that sentence\"* — the same distributor slipping three weeks running *\"start[s] asking for a discount.\"* Soft, not infinitely soft, decaying with repetition on one customer. **Deposit:** *\"that's genuinely a 'sit down with commercial' conversation, nobody's ever made me quantify it.\"*\n\n---\n\n### 1.2 Entity types\n\n**E1 — Order (in the demand book)**\n- *Distinctions* **(spelled out)** — Meridian vs non-Meridian (flagged on the order; it *\"jumps to the top of my attention\"*); family, which drives allocation and changeover.\n- *State riding along* **(spelled out)** — SKU, quantity, due date + delivery window, Meridian flag, family: **base white / tinted colour / specialty clear**. *\"That's not my judgment, that's how the SKU's classified in the system, it drives what changeover you need going in and out.\"*\n- *Population* — ⚠ not obtained.\n\n**E2 — Batch**\n- *Distinctions* **(spelled out)** — inherits its order's family.\n- *Relation to E1* **(spelled out)** — *\"mostly the order is the batch, if it fits a reasonable run size\"*; split into two batches at different times when a distributor orders *\"more than makes sense in a single run\"* or to interleave something urgent. *\"Not a strict one-to-one — I have the freedom to split if I need to.\"*\n- *Population* — ⚠ run sizes, split cost not obtained.\n\n**E3 — Line** *(contended resource)*\n- *Distinctions* **(spelled out)** — **Line 1**: *\"the old workhorse — slower but it's qualified for everything, including specialty\"*; crew say it's *\"fussier to get properly clean.\"* **Line 2**: *\"the fast one, that's your big-volume runner.\"* **Line 3**: *\"the newest and quickest, but it's still being qualified product by product, so it can't run everything yet\"* — so far *\"mostly one or two SKUs.\"*\n- *State riding along* **(spelled out)** — the family the line is currently dirty with (selects the changeover, F3); its qualification set.\n- *How many* **(number)** — 3.\n\n**E4 — Changeover tech** *(contended resource)*\n- *Distinctions* **(named)** — none drawn; treated as interchangeable (ledger #8).\n- *State riding along* **(spelled out)** — which line they're committed to; can be *\"pulled away partway through\"*, and on long soaks *\"might duck off to start something on another line.\"*\n- *How many* **(number)** — 2 on day shift for all three lines. *\"That's it. No dedicated tech per line.\"*\n\n**E5 — QA lab**\n- ⚠ nothing obtained but its existence, that every batch passes through, and that it *\"gets backed up on a Friday afternoon.\"* Whether it queues like the techs is open — and load-bearing for O2 by her own diagnosis: *\"half the time a 'late' order was actually sitting done in QA hold waiting for the lab to get to it.\"*\n\n---\n\n### 1.3 Boundary conditions\n\n**B1 — ERP weekly pull** — *starting state* **(spelled out)**: orders come from ERP on the weekly pull with SKU, quantity, due date, Meridian flag. *Arrival pattern* — ⚠ **not obtained** (demanded: spread).\n\n**B2 — Mid-week drop-in order and the heads-up before it** — ⚠ **not obtained** (demanded: spread). Only the anecdote: *\"I had a heads-up another same-family white order was about to drop in from a distributor.\"* Who, how far ahead, how often right: all unknown. **This is the trigger O1 hangs on.**\n\n**B3 — Meridian dock appointment** — *pattern* **(spelled out, qualitative)**: ship date + delivery window on the order, resolving to a specific appointment their end. Lead-time distribution ⚠.\n\n**B4 — Tech availability** — **partially spelled out**: two techs, **day shift**. Coverage outside day shift ⚠ (ledger #5).\n\n**B5 — Line 3 qualification set** — ⚠ *\"mostly one or two SKUs\"*; which ones, unknown.\n\n---\n\n### 1.4 Activities\n\n**A1 — Lands in the demand book.** Needs the weekly pull; produces an order in the book, flagged or not; unattended (ERP); instantaneous. **spelled out**\n\n**A2 — Allocate to a line.** Needs an order; produces an assignment; performed by Marta; not a schedule constraint — for Meridian whites *\"that's not really a decision.\"* Rule: P1. **spelled out**\n\n**A3 — Reorder the queue.** Needs an order behind others; produces a changed sequence; performed by Marta. *\"Sometimes I'll reorder things a bit so it doesn't get stuck behind a big changeover.\"* Rule: P4. **spelled out**\n\n**A4 — Quick rinse, same family (white→white), Line 2**\n- *Needs* — previous batch off, a tech free, next SKU same family. *Produces* — *\"the fill head's actually running clean product again.\"*\n- *Performed by* **(named)** — one tech.\n- *Duration, line down* **(spread)** — **typical 25 min**; **worse 45 min**, *\"usually because the tech's tied up finishing something on another line first and there's a wait before they even start on Line 2\"*; **better 15 min**, *\"if the tech's standing right there and it's a genuinely easy one.\"*\n- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out)** — equals line-down: *\"the tech's on it start to finish, no gap between 'crew starts' and 'line stops.'\"*\n- *Mode-change loss* — this activity **is** the loss.\n- *Varies by type* **(named)** — yes, by family-pair (F3). By line: ⚠ ledger #1, #2.\n\n**A5 — White → tint, Line 2** — *\"the easier direction\"*\n- *Performed by* **(named)** — one tech.\n- *Duration, line down* **(spread)** — **typical 45 min**; **worse \"an hour and a bit\"** (ledger #3), *\"if the tech gets pulled away partway through\"*; **better ~30 min**, *\"if everything's staged.\"*\n- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative)** — *\"hands-on for most of it — this one doesn't have much soak-and-wait, it's mostly just doing the work.\"* Fraction: ledger #4.\n\n**A6 — Tint → white, Line 2, full washdown** — *\"the ugly one\"*\n- *Needs* — as A5 plus a **passing visual check** before release to production.\n- *Duration, line down* **(spread)** — **typical ~3 h**; **worse 4 h \"maybe a bit more\"** (ledger #3), *\"if it doesn't pass the visual check first time and they have to redo part of it\"*; **better ~2 h**, *\"a clean fast one… if the crew's good and nothing complicates it.\"*\n- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative; her own hedge preserved)** — *\"less than the 3 hours suggests — there's real soak and rinse-cycle time where the tech's not standing there… I'd guess they're actually working maybe half of that.\"* Fraction: ledger #4.\n- *Rationale* **(spelled out)** — *\"any pigment left behind ruins a white batch, so it's a full washdown.\"*\n- **Asymmetry is load-bearing** — *\"It absolutely depends on direction — that's the thing people forget… it is absolutely not symmetric, and it trips people up if they assume it is.\"*\n\n**A7 — Into / out of specialty clear, Line 1**\n- *Duration, line down* **(spread)** — **typical 2 h**, *\"roughly the same both directions, unlike white/tint\"*; **worse 3 h**, *\"if it's coming out of clear and they're being extra careful about residue, since clear can be sneaky — you don't always see it the way you'd see pigment\"*; **better 1.5 h**, *\"a quick swap and the line was already fairly clean.\"*\n- *Crew hands-on* **(spelled out, qualitative)** — *\"most of that — specialty doesn't have the long soak cycles… it's more just physically thorough cleaning because the product's thick and clingy.\"* Fraction: ledger #4.\n\n**A8 — Run the batch** — mix, mill, tint (or *\"straight through if it's a plain white\"*), fill, pack.\n- *Needs* **(spelled out)** — clean line in the right family state; batch released to run. *Produces* **(spelled out)** — filled and packed batch.\n- *Performed by* — ⚠ line operators never elicited as a resource.\n- *Duration* — ⚠ **nothing obtained** (demanded: spread, per family and per line).\n- *Varies by type* — partially: *\"for a white that's usually the more straightforward path\"*, but no durations attach.\n- **The largest hole in the model.** O1 is a question about a week; run time is most of a week.\n\n**A9 — QA hold and release** — *\"every batch does.\"*\n- *Performed by* **(named)** — the lab (E5).\n- *Duration* — *\"typically a few hours before it's released\"*: an honest **number at the wrong precision**; demanded as a **spread**. ⚠\n- *Failure path* — ⚠ never asked.\n- *Pathology* **(spelled out qualitatively; rate ⚠)** — *\"if QA's backed up on a Friday afternoon, that's where it actually goes sideways, not on the line\"*; *\"the QA step is the one people don't think about when they're mad at scheduling.\"*\n\n**A10 — Stage for shipping and ship.** Needs QA release; produces the order off the dock; *\"that's when the truck appointment matters.\"* Constraint C4. Duration ⚠.\n\n**A11 — Tech pulled away mid-changeover** *(event, not step)* — named as the mechanism behind A4's and A5's worse tails. *Rate* ⚠ not obtained separately; currently only implicit in those tails (P01 unsatisfied).\n\n**A12 — Washdown fails the visual check, part redone** *(event, not step)* — named as the mechanism behind A6's 4 h tail. *Rate* ⚠ (ledger #7).\n\n**A13 — \"The mill motor issue\"** *(event, named in passing only)* — offered as an example of what a *structural* line difference would look like, in contrast to Line 1 merely being fussier. Rate ⚠, duration ⚠, consequence ⚠. This is the entirety of the breakdown stratum, which was never swept.\n\n---\n\n### 1.5 Ordering / flow\n\n**F1 — The main arc, desk to dock** **(spelled out — her six steps)**\n1. Lands in the demand book (ERP weekly pull).\n2. Allocated to a line (*\"Meridian whites always go to Line 2\"*).\n3. Sits in the queue behind whatever's running — reorderable (A3/P4).\n4. Changeover if needed (F3), then runs: mix, mill, tint-or-straight-through, fill, pack.\n5. QA hold.\n6. Released, staged, out against the truck appointment.\n\n**F2 — Order-to-batch split** — *order* **(spelled out)**: one batch by default, possibly two run at different times. *Branch decided by* **(spelled out)**: Marta, on run size or urgency-interleaving. *Cost of a split* ⚠ (P03 unresolved).\n\n**F3 — Which changeover applies** **(spelled out)** — by (family on the line, family of next batch, line): same family → **A4**; white→tint → **A5**; tint→white → **A6**; into/out of specialty → **A7** (Line 1 only).\n\n---\n\n### 1.6 Policies\n\n**P1 — \"Meridian whites always go to Line 2, that's just how it's done here.\"** *Practiced* **(spelled out)**; a fixed allocation, not a decision. Overrides ⚠ never asked.\n\n**P2 — Meridian on-time is absolute.** *Practiced* **(spelled out)** — *\"we don't even try to be clever about it.\"* Overrides **(spelled out)**: none — that is the policy's content. Rationale: fine, on-time percentage, delisting precedent.\n\n**P3 — Who gets the tech when two lines want one**\n- *Prescribed form:* **none exists** — *\"there's no posted rule at all.\"*\n- *As practiced* **(spelled out)** — in the room: *\"whoever's louder at the huddle, or whoever's about to actually run dry.\"* The underlying logic: *\"it's mostly gut triage: whichever line has the more time-sensitive order behind it wins, and if that's a tie, whichever changeover is faster wins so you get a line moving sooner.\"*\n- *Borderline case on record* — Line 1 and Line 3 both wanted a washdown one morning. **Line 3 got the tech**, *\"not because it was more important, but because Line 3's changeover was the quick one and Line 1's was going to be the long tint-to-white slog anyway, so the thinking was 'knock out the fast one, get that line moving, then commit the tech to the long one.'\"* Line 1 sat **clean-but-waiting almost 40 minutes**.\n- *What overrides it* **(spelled out)** — the ops director: *\"I've been overruled by the ops director once when he wanted his pet SKU out the door.\"*\n- *Rationale* **(spelled out)** — *\"the crew's a shared resource and sometimes there's a queue for them before the clock even starts on the line\"* — *\"the bit that actually causes grief at the huddle.\"*\n\n**P4 — Reorder so a job isn't stuck behind a big changeover.** *Practiced* **(spelled out)**. Overrides ⚠.\n\n**P5 — Hold the line for an anticipated same-family order** *(the decision under test)*. *Practiced, one instance* **(spelled out)** — hold Line 2 idle *\"maybe an hour\"* rather than wash down for the waiting tint, *\"because doing them back to back would save us a full washdown.\"* Trigger strength and holding threshold ⚠ (depends on B2).\n\n**P6 — Batch-split discretion.** *Practiced* **(spelled out)** — *\"I have the freedom to split if I need to.\"* Overrides ⚠.\n\n---\n\n### 1.7 Constraints\n\n**C1 — Line qualification.** *Limit* **(partially spelled out)** — Line 1 everything incl. specialty; Line 3 product-by-product, *\"can't run everything yet\"* (which SKUs ⚠); Line 2's set ⚠. *When hit* **(spelled out)** — the batch cannot go on that line.\n\n**C2 — Two techs, three lines.** *Limit* **(spelled out)**. *When hit* **(spelled out)** — *\"if Line 1 and Line 3 both want a washdown at the same time, one of them waits\"* — clean-but-idle, 40 min in the recorded case; resolved by P3.\n\n**C3 — Tint→white needs a full washdown passing a visual check.** *When hit* **(spelled out)** — *\"any pigment left behind ruins a white batch\"*; a failed check means part is redone (A12).\n\n**C4 — Meridian must leave our dock a day ahead of the appointment.** *When hit* **(spelled out)** — fine, on-time percentage damage, delisting exposure.\n\n**C5 — Every batch passes QA hold before release.** *When hit* **(spelled out)** — nothing ships unreleased; it waits in hold.\n\n**Unwritten constraints** — ⚠ the closing sweep was never run. The one that surfaced unprompted is the changeover asymmetry: *\"that one catches everybody, including people who've been on the floor a lot longer than me.\"*\n\n---\n\n### 1.8 Dynamics\n\n**None.** Nothing described evolves continuously while nothing discrete happens. The soak and rinse-cycle time inside A6 is dead time *within* an activity, not a state variable crossing a threshold; I have deliberately not promoted it to one.\n\n---\n\n### 1.9 Data bindings *(named only — project to nothing today)*\n\n| Feed | Would drive | Provenance |\n|---|---|---|\n| Changeover logs (tech start/finish) | A4–A7 durations, crew hands-on fractions; retires ledger #1, #4 | **Qualified:** *\"I've never audited that field myself, I mostly just glance at duration.\"* Coverage unknown, possibly patchy; **Line 1 and Line 3** named as where to look. Marta will flag it to the two techs. |\n| ERP demand book | B1, B2 | not discussed |\n| QA release timestamps | A9 duration, lab queueing | not discussed |\n| Meridian on-time percentage | O2 | tracked by Meridian; visible to commercial |\n\n**Finding in its own right:** patchy changeover logging concentrated on Lines 1 and 3 is evidence about the plant, not merely an obstacle — *\"that itself would be useful for you to know, not just an inconvenience.\"*\n\n---\n\n### 1.10 Validation criteria\n\n⚠ **None obtained.** How Marta would know the model is right was never asked.\n\n---\n\n## 2. Assumption ledger\n\nEverything here is mine. None of it is hers.\n\n| # | Assumption | Why | How to check |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| **1** | Line 1 changeover durations = Line 2 × **1.2**, all types | She could not give Line 1 minutes — *\"I couldn't swear the minutes are identical… the crew sometimes says it's fussier.\"* I proposed 20%; she replied *\"20% sounds about right, not double.\"* **The factor originated with me**; her assent is not authorship. | Changeover logs, Line 1 vs Line 2, same family-pair. **Blocked by the unaudited start/finish field — and Line 1 is one of the two lines she expects to be patchy.** |\n| **2** | Line 3 changeover durations = Line 2, unscaled | *\"Line 3 I genuinely don't have a good feel for… you're stuck assuming it's like Line 1 or Line 2.\"* She offered the disjunction; **picking Line 2 was mine.** | As #1, once Line 3 has run more products. Also expected patchy. |\n| **3** | \"An hour and a bit\" (A5 worse) = **70 min**; \"4, maybe a bit more\" (A6 worse) = **4.5 h** | Numeric readings so the spreads are usable. | One question to Marta: confirm or correct. |\n| **4** | Crew hands-on: A4 = **1.0**, A5 = **0.8**, A6 = **0.5**, A7 = **0.8** | A4's 1.0 is hers, stated. A6's 0.5 tracks *\"maybe half of that\"* — but note her hedge, *\"I'd guess.\"* **The two 0.8s, from \"most of it\" / \"most of that\", are mine.** | Changeover logs vs tech time records, or ask the techs. Same blocker as #1. |\n| **5** | No changeover outside day shift | She said *\"two techs on **day shift**\"*; other coverage never asked. | One question to Marta. |\n| **6** | A changeover needs exactly **one** tech | She said *\"the tech\"*, singular, throughout — including the 3-hour washdown. | One question to Marta or the techs. |\n| **7** | A12 folded **inside** A6's 4 h tail rather than a separate event with its own rate | She described it as *the cause of* the tail. Keeps the spread self-contained; contrary to P01, which would separate rate from duration. | Ask how often the visual check fails first time; split it out if common. |\n| **8** | The two techs are **interchangeable** | She drew no distinction. | One question to Marta. |\n\n**Second-order note on #1 and #4:** their check depends on a feed of unverified coverage, concentrated exactly where the assumptions bite. If the field proves patchy on Line 1, the honest move is to **widen** them, not fill them in.\n\n---\n\n## 3. What the model leaves out, and why\n\n**Deliberately excluded**\n- **Queues, buffers, waiting states** are not nodes — the wait behind a running batch, the wait for a tech, the wait in QA hold. Each is implied by the activities either side and emerges in projection. Line 1's 40 minutes clean-but-waiting is an **output** the model should reproduce, not an input.\n- **The commercial layer** — fine amount, on-time percentage mechanics, delisting threshold. C4 and O2 carry the hard deadline; the money is outside the scheduler's sight and commercial owns it.\n- **Individual tech identity** (ledger #8). **Scenarios** — assembled from B1–B5 at simulation time, not elicited.\n\n**Real, and the formalism cannot carry it — kept in words**\n- **O4, \"how ugly the sheet looks.\"** A criterion she genuinely uses and explicitly refuses to number. Approximating it as line idle hours would be my move; I have not made it.\n- **The O2 / O3 / lateness trade-off weight.** Unquantified with the source named. The model can report changeover hours, Meridian lateness and distributor lateness **separately**, but cannot rank two schedules that trade one against another — a real limit on O1, whose \"costs less\" implicitly spans them.\n- **The decay of softness** — the same distributor slipping *\"the third week running\"* turning into a discount demand: a memory effect across weeks on one customer, stated as a rule, unquantified, unrepresented.\n- **The huddle.** *\"Whoever's louder\"* and the ops director's pet-SKU override are the real P3 in the room. The triage logic is compilable; loudness and the override are not. **Any run of this model will be quieter and more rational than the plant.** Remember that when a result looks tidy.\n\n---\n\n## 4. What remains unknown, in the order I would close it\n\n1. **A8 run duration** — nothing at all, per family and per line, as a spread. **Nothing about O1 is answerable until this exists.**\n2. **B2, the drop-in and the heads-up** — who, how far ahead, how often right. P5 is the decision under test and its trigger is one anecdote.\n3. **A9 QA hold** — *\"a few hours\"* is honest at the wrong precision; and whether the lab queues like the techs. By her own account this is where lateness actually comes from, so it bears directly on O2.\n4. **B1** — orders per weekly pull and within-week shape.\n5. **E2 / F2** — run sizes, the \"reasonable run size\" threshold, and what a split costs in extra changeovers.\n6. **C1 / B5** — which SKUs Line 3 is qualified for; whether Line 2 has restrictions.\n7. **Breakdowns and interruptions** — the whole stratum. A13 is a name with no rate, duration or consequence; A11 and A12 need rate separated from duration.\n8. **Unwritten-constraint sweep** and **validation criteria** — neither was run.\n\n**Status against the completion criteria**\n- **Static floor: satisfied** — 4 objectives, 5 entity types, 13 activities, 3 ordering/flow nodes.\n- **O2, O3:** slices substantially satisfied except A8 and A9 durations.\n- **O1: slice incomplete.** A8 has no duration; B2 has no arrival pattern. O1 is currently **answerable only for Line 2**, and only once run times exist. Ledger #1–#4 are the first assumptions to attack if any Line 1 or Line 3 result ever looks decisive.\n- **O4:** recorded; unsupported for quantitative use, by its author's own description.\n\n**What I do not claim.** I have elicited a model, not built a net. The SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar and the typed loss report are derived from this model by the tooling's projection — I have not written them, and I am not claiming this loads, compiles, or runs. The A8 hole alone would stop it.\n\n---\n\n*Session closed at the expert's stop. Three questions queued for resumption: run duration for a plain white on Line 2 (typical / one-in-ten worse / one-in-ten better); the heads-up mechanism behind B2; QA hold as a spread, and whether the lab queues.*" + } + ] +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5-captures.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5-captures.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..134268ce2f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5-captures.json @@ -0,0 +1,9292 @@ +{ + "captures": [ + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Stated as the decision the model must settle: given a line-down event with unknown ETA, which of the available scheduling options loses less.", + "assertion": { + "value": "When a line goes down with ETA unknown, be able to enter that state and have the model say which option — wait out the repair, or move the order to the other line — actually loses less, instead of the scheduler doing gut math at the huddle." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a6ad400e-463a-4e08-80e5-1b5448355f62", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"When a line goes down with ETA unknown, be able to enter that state and have the model say which option — wait out the repair, or move the order to the other line — actually loses less, instead of the scheduler doing gut math at the huddle.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as the decision the model must settle: given a line-down event with unknown ETA, which of the available scheduling options loses less.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'd love to type in \\\\\\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\\\\\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert gave a lexicographic scorecard with an explicit refusal of a formula for the second tier.", + "assertion": { + "value": "First and non-negotiable: days late on the Meridian order, where anything above zero is bad. Below that, weighed together with no formula: washdown hours, and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — with judgment applied to who the customer is and who can absorb the slip (a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem)." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \"cross the line\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \"how bad is bad\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-76159984-4b11-446f-a707-bc8302ef0b1d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"First and non-negotiable: days late on the Meridian order, where anything above zero is bad. Below that, weighed together with no formula: washdown hours, and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — with judgment applied to who the customer is and who can absorb the slip (a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem).\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert gave a lexicographic scorecard with an explicit refusal of a formula for the second tier.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \\\\\\\"cross the line\\\\\\\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \\\\\\\"how bad is bad\\\\\\\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The scorecard names the washdown, the line-down event, and the orders with their due dates and customers as what the answer is computed from.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "activity:tint-to-white washdown", + "activity:Line 2 filler jam", + "entity-type:order", + "entity-type:line" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-3f2444d5-8001-46d9-8a92-c85f8c6f8d6a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"activity:tint-to-white washdown\",\"activity:Line 2 filler jam\",\"entity-type:order\",\"entity-type:line\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The scorecard names the washdown, the line-down event, and the orders with their due dates and customers as what the answer is computed from.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "number", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert gave a single figure, not a spread; the low/high and typical are not yet on record.", + "assertion": { + "value": "three hours" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b42a88f7-65b8-4f76-833d-18f39111ec49", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"three hours\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Expert gave a single figure, not a spread; the low/high and typical are not yet on record.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert stated the outcome as consuming crew time and blocking the line for the window.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Consumes crew time and takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window; afterwards the line is in white rather than tint." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-053410a5-6574-4355-aabf-dd972f0088e1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Consumes crew time and takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window; afterwards the line is in white rather than tint.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert stated the outcome as consuming crew time and blocking the line for the window.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Stated as the consequence of pulling a line off a tint run to run a white order; the full precondition list was not elicited.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line currently running a tint that is to be switched to a white order — pulling Line 1 off its tint run to cover Meridian white incurs the washdown." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-e86ee1d3-dbbd-4e2d-b1c0-a8ac719f0e58", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line currently running a tint that is to be switched to a white order — pulling Line 1 off its tint run to cover Meridian white incurs the washdown.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as the consequence of pulling a line off a tint run to run a white order; the full precondition list was not elicited.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "precision": "number", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Loss named for the tint-to-white transition specifically, as a single figure plus crew time; other transitions were not yet asked about.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours of the line plus crew time for the tint-to-white transition; the bumped order may itself go late as a knock-on." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-04d27279-48f8-437e-8688-14c400f3f0f1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours of the line plus crew time for the tint-to-white transition; the bumped order may itself go late as a knock-on.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Loss named for the tint-to-white transition specifically, as a single figure plus crew time; other transitions were not yet asked about.\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "Line 2 filler jam", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert described two kinds of repair — half an hour and half a shift — and one observed instance of about two hours; quantiles not yet elicited.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Repairs come in a \"half hour\" kind and a \"half a shift\" kind; the recent instance came back in about two hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7d1cb932-a1d6-4e1a-86a7-984a9d53af80", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Repairs come in a \\\"half hour\\\" kind and a \\\"half a shift\\\" kind; the recent instance came back in about two hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"Line 2 filler jam\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Expert described two kinds of repair — half an hour and half a shift — and one observed instance of about two hours; quantiles not yet elicited.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "Line 2 filler jam", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The event takes the line out of production and puts the order sitting on it at risk, forcing a wait-or-move decision.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Line 2 stops producing until repaired (half a shift lost in the recent case); the order sitting on Line 2 is at risk of its due date, forcing a decision to wait out the repair or shift the order to Line 1." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2, and I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-330b99df-25fc-4d38-b1f9-6f8da955b79e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Line 2 stops producing until repaired (half a shift lost in the recent case); the order sitting on Line 2 is at risk of its due date, forcing a decision to wait out the repair or shift the order to Line 1.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"Line 2 filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The event takes the line out of production and puts the order sitting on it at risk, forcing a wait-or-move decision.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2, and I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "Meridian ships on time, full stop", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Stated as an absolute the scheduler protects ahead of all other considerations.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The Meridian order ships on time, full stop; it is not traded off against washdown hours or other orders' due dates." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-caeeeb12-a91f-46a0-88c2-a622d4d30c55", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The Meridian order ships on time, full stop; it is not traded off against washdown hours or other orders' due dates.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"Meridian ships on time, full stop\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as an absolute the scheduler protects ahead of all other considerations.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "Meridian ships on time, full stop", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert named the sole override in general terms; the practiced test for \"no way through\" is not yet on record.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Only when there is truly no way through; otherwise nothing overrides it." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I use judgment on who can absorb the slip", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-422d7f74-a119-45d6-8261-3c71b50af7f7", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Only when there is truly no way through; otherwise nothing overrides it.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"Meridian ships on time, full stop\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert named the sole override in general terms; the practiced test for \\\"no way through\\\" is not yet on record.\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I use judgment on who can absorb the slip\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Orders are treated apart by colour class (white vs tint, which drives washdown) and by customer class (distributor / small account / awkward account that gets prickly).", + "assertion": { + "value": "Orders differ by colour class — white versus tint, which decides whether a washdown is incurred — and by customer, sorted into a distributor (sliding two days is a shrug), a small account (sliding a week is fine), and an awkward account that gets prickly." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer, because a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-f2a03b6c-0420-48a7-85be-bdcb3536a6f7", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Orders differ by colour class — white versus tint, which decides whether a washdown is incurred — and by customer, sorted into a distributor (sliding two days is a shrug), a small account (sliding a week is fine), and an awkward account that gets prickly.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Orders are treated apart by colour class (white vs tint, which drives washdown) and by customer class (distributor / small account / awkward account that gets prickly).\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer, because a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Each order is spoken of as carrying a due date, a customer, a colour, and the line it is sitting on.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Its due date (e.g. due Thursday), its customer (e.g. Meridian), its colour (white or tint), and which line it is sitting on." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-c9ac976a-3eef-4a77-8e29-3598b184b450", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Its due date (e.g. due Thursday), its customer (e.g. Meridian), its colour (white or tint), and which line it is sitting on.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Each order is spoken of as carrying a due date, a customer, a colour, and the line it is sitting on.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Line 1 and Line 2 named; whether these are the only lines has not been asked.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Line 1 and Line 2 named so far; total count not yet confirmed." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair. Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-6bc324a5-2e12-4070-8275-fdfe819923e6", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Line 1 and Line 2 named so far; total count not yet confirmed.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Line 1 and Line 2 named; whether these are the only lines has not been asked.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair. Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "A line is spoken of as carrying what it is currently running (its colour state) and whether it is down.", + "assertion": { + "value": "What it is currently running — e.g. mid-run on a tint, which sets the colour it would have to be washed down from — and whether it is jammed/down awaiting repair." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-b003fc51-0ade-4721-b400-b7b68edf8c60", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"What it is currently running — e.g. mid-run on a tint, which sets the colour it would have to be washed down from — and whether it is jammed/down awaiting repair.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"A line is spoken of as carrying what it is currently running (its colour state) and whether it is down.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option loses less", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Stated as the concrete decision support the model must give, anchored to the Line 2 filler jam incident.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Given a disruption in progress (e.g. \"filler's down, ETA unknown\"), which of the available scheduling options — wait out the repair on the down line, or move the order to another line — actually loses less, decided in the moment instead of by gut math at the huddle." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a0a0bd7a-32fe-47e3-a2f4-8a452fe769bc", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Given a disruption in progress (e.g. \\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\"), which of the available scheduling options — wait out the repair on the down line, or move the order to another line — actually loses less, decided in the moment instead of by gut math at the huddle.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as the concrete decision support the model must give, anchored to the Line 2 filler jam incident.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'd love to type in \\\\\\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\\\\\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option loses less", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert explicitly denies having a weighting formula; the ordering is stated, the weights are not.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Lexicographic: first, days late on the hard-line order (Meridian) — yes/no, anything above zero is bad; below that, weigh washdown hours against whether the bumped order goes late and by how much, and who the customer is. No formula for the second-order trade-off — \"how bad is bad\", judged by who can absorb the slip." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \"cross the line\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \"how bad is bad\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-de512bde-aa52-4147-933f-81439aa5ec6d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Lexicographic: first, days late on the hard-line order (Meridian) — yes/no, anything above zero is bad; below that, weigh washdown hours against whether the bumped order goes late and by how much, and who the customer is. No formula for the second-order trade-off — \\\"how bad is bad\\\", judged by who can absorb the slip.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert explicitly denies having a weighting formula; the ordering is stated, the weights are not.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \\\\\\\"cross the line\\\\\\\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \\\\\\\"how bad is bad\\\\\\\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option loses less", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The scorecard names on-time delivery, washdown hours, lateness of the bumped order, and the repair outcome; the judgment of who can absorb a slip is the tiebreaker.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "constraint:Meridian on time", + "activity:tint-to-white washdown", + "activity:filler jam", + "entity-type:order", + "entity-type:line", + "policy:who can absorb the slip" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late. If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a6e8dc50-fffb-494d-8bd2-59704c0427e4", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"constraint:Meridian on time\",\"activity:tint-to-white washdown\",\"activity:filler jam\",\"entity-type:order\",\"entity-type:line\",\"policy:who can absorb the slip\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option loses less\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The scorecard names on-time delivery, washdown hours, lateness of the bumped order, and the repair outcome; the judgment of who can absorb a slip is the tiebreaker.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late. If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Colour class changes the process at the tint stage; customer type changes how lateness is weighed.", + "assertion": { + "value": "An order is a line item in the demand book from ERP. Treated apart by: product colour class — white (tint stage is barely there, a pass-through rather than a real letdown step) versus tint/specialty; and by customer type — distributor (a two-day slide is a shrug), small account (a week is fine), and awkward accounts that get prickly." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "because a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3cb49f42-f479-4b67-be4c-22c8f9771f6e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"An order is a line item in the demand book from ERP. Treated apart by: product colour class — white (tint stage is barely there, a pass-through rather than a real letdown step) versus tint/specialty; and by customer type — distributor (a two-day slide is a shrug), small account (a week is fine), and awkward accounts that get prickly.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Colour class changes the process at the tint stage; customer type changes how lateness is weighed.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"because a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Named directly as what the demand-book line item carries, extended by the allocation step and the account-based lateness judgment.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Quantity, due date, SKU; plus the line and week-slot it has been allocated to on the sheet; plus the customer/account it belongs to." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-5628ca29-5985-4005-aa3f-a6885dc38223", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU; plus the line and week-slot it has been allocated to on the sheet; plus the customer/account it belongs to.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Named directly as what the demand-book line item carries, extended by the allocation step and the account-based lateness judgment.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Lines are contended for between orders in the decision described.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Production lines, referred to individually as Line 1 and Line 2; an order is allocated to a specific line and a line can be mid-run on another order." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair. Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6d4d1074-f6fe-4d4c-95c2-f242a6f98233", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Production lines, referred to individually as Line 1 and Line 2; an order is allocated to a specific line and a line can be mid-run on another order.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Lines are contended for between orders in the decision described.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair. Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Only the two lines involved in the incident were named; the plant's full line count was never asked.", + "assertion": { + "value": "At least two lines named: Line 1 and Line 2. Total line count not stated." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a0b65576-83d8-4134-9fbe-9b059663ae12", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"At least two lines named: Line 1 and Line 2. Total line count not stated.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Only the two lines involved in the incident were named; the plant's full line count was never asked.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "order flow from demand book to shipment", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Given verbatim as the end-to-end sequence for the Meridian white order.", + "assertion": { + "value": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill (fill and pack) → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if QA and shipping are counted as one, five if split." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-cbe1db57-3beb-4e48-9ef4-d81d638fa94a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill (fill and pack) → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if QA and shipping are counted as one, five if split.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"order flow from demand book to shipment\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Given verbatim as the end-to-end sequence for the Meridian white order.\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Stated as the trigger for the order becoming something to schedule.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line item in the demand book, produced by ERP, carrying quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line item in the demand book, produced by ERP, carrying quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as the trigger for the order becoming something to schedule.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Directly stated as the outcome of step one.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is slotted onto a specific line and a slot in the week, on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-fa56fa8b-611a-4a38-9a42-1bd038e52d80", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is slotted onto a specific line and a slot in the week, on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Directly stated as the outcome of step one.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "First person throughout; role stated at the outset.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The master scheduler (the expert), working on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 1, + "entryEnd": 1 + }, + "source": "user" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-dba4ec08-0265-420c-95d2-4dce250ae0b6", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The master scheduler (the expert), working on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"First person throughout; role stated at the outset.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":1,\\\"entryStart\\\":1,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Stated as the production step common to all products.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Runs the order through four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack — producing filled and packed product that comes off the fill line." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0b2046b4-55c8-4ce3-abac-296d6abe469d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Runs the order through four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack — producing filled and packed product that comes off the fill line.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as the production step common to all products.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Explicit type-dependence at the tint stage; stage durations themselves not yet given.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes — the stages are the same for every product, but for a white the tint stage is barely there, a pass-through rather than a real letdown step." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-8156b872-b3c2-43db-aa67-56166bebe556", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes — the stages are the same for every product, but for a white the tint stage is barely there, a pass-through rather than a real letdown step.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Explicit type-dependence at the tint stage; stage durations themselves not yet given.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Stated as the precondition and the waiting arrangement.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order has come off the fill line; it then sits in the lab's queue awaiting check." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-585f76f6-e841-4ef2-94df-036e711ebce8", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order has come off the fill line; it then sits in the lab's queue awaiting check.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as the precondition and the waiting arrangement.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Release is the stated outcome of the QA hold.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is checked and then released, after which it goes to the warehouse and ships against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-589bc2db-8fc9-4d65-8024-b34ce4cd736a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is checked and then released, after which it goes to the warehouse and ships against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Release is the stated outcome of the QA hold.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Named as the owner of the queue and the check.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The lab." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-07de77cc-9de8-41e9-92f6-8fe06a6263c9", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The lab.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Named as the owner of the queue and the check.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Hedged quantifier only; not yet a usable spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Usually a few hours for a white; longer for specialty (\"nothing like the specialty wait\"). No figures for typical, one-in-ten worse or one-in-ten better yet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6ca0ba27-000e-4cbd-ae25-39dc7a1c679c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Usually a few hours for a white; longer for specialty (\\\"nothing like the specialty wait\\\"). No figures for typical, one-in-ten worse or one-in-ten better yet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Hedged quantifier only; not yet a usable spread.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Type dependence stated explicitly in the same breath as the duration.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes — a white is usually a few hours, specialty waits are much longer." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-22890cbe-8720-408f-a3c9-fcbfe3826f2b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes — a white is usually a few hours, specialty waits are much longer.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Type dependence stated explicitly in the same breath as the duration.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "release and ship", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Final step of the walkthrough; due date is the reference for the objective's lateness metric.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The released order goes to the warehouse and ships against its due date; lateness is measured as days late against that due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-551ab6a6-2f47-4514-ad0b-f5995ef609b2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The released order goes to the warehouse and ships against its due date; lateness is measured as days late against that due date.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Final step of the walkthrough; due date is the reference for the objective's lateness metric.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Named as the changeover that the tint→white switch forces.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line changing over from a tint run to a white run; the line must be pulled off the tint it is mid-run on." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7df09f81-9c85-43ac-b69e-306d540f8afb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line changing over from a tint run to a white run; the line must be pulled off the tint it is mid-run on.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Named as the changeover that the tint→white switch forces.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "number", + "rationale": "A single figure was given, not a spread; recorded at the precision actually reached.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours (tint-to-white)." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-e0f39723-a7e5-4656-a8fb-0e2b50bb82da", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours (tint-to-white).\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"A single figure was given, not a spread; recorded at the precision actually reached.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "precision": "number", + "rationale": "Loss named for a specific named transition (tint to white); only one figure given.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours of the line's availability — real cost and crew time — during which the line is out of anything else." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d8dffb0f-f148-4af2-ba7e-478a6a1b38c6", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours of the line's availability — real cost and crew time — during which the line is out of anything else.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Loss named for a specific named transition (tint to white); only one figure given.\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Effect on line availability stated directly.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Puts the line into a state able to run white; the line is unavailable for any other work for the duration." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a2938097-b902-4f24-8e15-70f4b8ce95fb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Puts the line into a state able to run white; the line is unavailable for any other work for the duration.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Effect on line availability stated directly.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Described as the disruption that forces the scheduling decision.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The line's filler goes down, stopping the order sitting on that line until the repair completes; the scheduler must then decide to wait it out or shift the order to another line." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-896881a6-c9ec-469f-ab03-4a56b59f6cad", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The line's filler goes down, stopping the order sitting on that line until the repair completes; the scheduler must then decide to wait it out or shift the order to another line.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Described as the disruption that forces the scheduling decision.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "rationale": "Two kinds named as the ends plus one observed instance; no typical or one-in-ten figures given, so this is a range, not a spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "From about half an hour (\"the 'half hour' kind\") to about half a shift (\"the 'half a shift' kind\"); the recent instance came back in about two hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "it came back in about two hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4a3ae53c-2c2f-4664-9499-7e81c254abc5", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"From about half an hour (\\\"the 'half hour' kind\\\") to about half a shift (\\\"the 'half a shift' kind\\\"); the recent instance came back in about two hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Two kinds named as the ends plus one observed instance; no typical or one-in-ten figures given, so this is a range, not a spread.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it came back in about two hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "One occurrence recounted; frequency never stated.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user", + "pointer": "rate of filler jams not yet asked or given" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\"", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d662739b-76f0-429a-829a-ccb79763b6b9", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\",\"pointer\":\"rate of filler jams not yet asked or given\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"One occurrence recounted; frequency never stated.\",\"slot\":\"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'd love to type in \\\\\\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "Meridian on time", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Stated as non-negotiable with a named consequence.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The hard-line customer's order must ship on or before its due date — days late must be zero. The line is not crossed unless there is truly no way through; if it is crossed, the scheduler has to go explain it." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a9e42aa6-8d30-4ded-a8c4-f24220cfb292", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The hard-line customer's order must ship on or before its due date — days late must be zero. The line is not crossed unless there is truly no way through; if it is crossed, the scheduler has to go explain it.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"Meridian on time\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as non-negotiable with a named consequence.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Given as the practiced basis for weighing knock-on lateness.", + "assertion": { + "value": "When deciding which order to bump, judge by who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; another awkward account that gets prickly creates a second problem to solve the first. Applied by judgment, with no formula." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I use judgment on who can absorb the slip", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b2c62684-e1ee-4d7f-b616-0ceb17a7282e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"When deciding which order to bump, judge by who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; another awkward account that gets prickly creates a second problem to solve the first. Applied by judgment, with no formula.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Given as the practiced basis for weighing knock-on lateness.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I use judgment on who can absorb the slip\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The expert states the model's job as evaluating a disruption response option set.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Given a disruption such as \"filler's down, ETA unknown\", tell me which option (switch the order to the other line, or wait out the repair) actually loses less — instead of gut math at the huddle." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1cb33f48-6553-4e4f-a8a0-37d7631b08ea", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Given a disruption such as \\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\", tell me which option (switch the order to the other line, or wait out the repair) actually loses less — instead of gut math at the huddle.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The expert states the model's job as evaluating a disruption response option set.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'd love to type in \\\\\\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\\\\\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Lexicographic scorecard given in words; the expert explicitly denies having numeric weights.", + "assertion": { + "value": "First and hard: days late on the Meridian-style order, anything above zero is bad. Underneath and traded off by judgement, not formula: washdown hours (crew time plus the line taken out of anything else), and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and for which customer. No formula for the second-order weighting." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I don't have a formula for it.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-f073c3ed-2a89-4499-b3b2-fe160e8c1057", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"First and hard: days late on the Meridian-style order, anything above zero is bad. Underneath and traded off by judgement, not formula: washdown hours (crew time plus the line taken out of anything else), and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and for which customer. No formula for the second-order weighting.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Lexicographic scorecard given in words; the expert explicitly denies having numeric weights.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I don't have a formula for it.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The options the expert weighed name these nodes directly.", + "assertion": { + "value": "activity:filler jam; activity:tint-to-white washdown; entity-type:order; entity-type:line (Line 1 / Line 2); ordering/flow:order flow, allocate to ship; policy:Meridian on time; policy:who can absorb the slip" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-c9864a2c-cbb3-41c9-97a6-e44cc1d7d424", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"activity:filler jam; activity:tint-to-white washdown; entity-type:order; entity-type:line (Line 1 / Line 2); ordering/flow:order flow, allocate to ship; policy:Meridian on time; policy:who can absorb the slip\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The options the expert weighed name these nodes directly.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "where Line 1 loses its time", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Second objective the expert put explicitly in scope.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Show where Line 1 loses its time — specifically whether the small tank between mill and fill is actually costing us — as evidence to take to engineering rather than a hunch." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If the model can actually show me \"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\" that's worth more to me long-term", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-480c2821-4d80-495b-a652-f5de8b035144", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Show where Line 1 loses its time — specifically whether the small tank between mill and fill is actually costing us — as evidence to take to engineering rather than a hunch.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"where Line 1 loses its time\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Second objective the expert put explicitly in scope.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If the model can actually show me \\\\\\\"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\\\\\\\" that's worth more to me long-term\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "where Line 1 loses its time", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The tank hunch is about these nodes.", + "assertion": { + "value": "constraint:small holding tanks between stages; entity-type:stage kit (mix, mill, tint, fill); ordering/flow:stage overlap on a line; constraint:published line rate" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-f3f2c366-eab0-49fa-951c-773f77aa11b2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"constraint:small holding tanks between stages; entity-type:stage kit (mix, mill, tint, fill); ordering/flow:stage overlap on a line; constraint:published line rate\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"where Line 1 loses its time\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The tank hunch is about these nodes.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Distinctions the expert's process treats differently: product class (white vs tint vs specialty) and customer account type.", + "assertion": { + "value": "An order is a line item in the demand book (quantity, due date, SKU). Whites differ from tints (tint stage is a pass-through for a white; a tint-to-white change costs a washdown) and from specialties (QA wait much longer). Customers differ: distributor, small account, and \"awkward\" accounts that get prickly." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3bb35fb7-3954-45d4-839f-20ee46a8c052", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"An order is a line item in the demand book (quantity, due date, SKU). Whites differ from tints (tint stage is a pass-through for a white; a tint-to-white change costs a washdown) and from specialties (QA wait much longer). Customers differ: distributor, small account, and \\\"awkward\\\" accounts that get prickly.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Distinctions the expert's process treats differently: product class (white vs tint vs specialty) and customer account type.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Attributes named on the order.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Quantity, due date, SKU; the line and slot in the week it is allocated to; the customer; and days late against its due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-e552ac87-8cfa-4091-a262-6fba33ab9f83", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU; the line and slot in the week it is allocated to; the customer; and days late against its due date.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Attributes named on the order.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line (Line 1 / Line 2)", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "prescribed", + "rationale": "The scheduling sheet's view of a line as a single indivisible resource.", + "assertion": { + "value": "On the sheet a line is one row, one thing: the order occupies it for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it's done." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \"Line 2\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c74bc46d-649f-4e44-a48d-3a005dc44a7e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"On the sheet a line is one row, one thing: the order occupies it for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it's done.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line (Line 1 / Line 2)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The scheduling sheet's view of a line as a single indivisible resource.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"prescribed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On the sheet, \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line (Line 1 / Line 2)", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Physical reality diverges from the sheet; both recorded on the same node.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Physically a line is not one thing: mix, mill, tint and fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-dd037a1c-63c0-47b8-8886-81c6d1f70226", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Physically a line is not one thing: mix, mill, tint and fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line (Line 1 / Line 2)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Physical reality diverges from the sheet; both recorded on the same node.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line (Line 1 / Line 2)", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Only Line 1 and Line 2 are named; no count was stated.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Line 1 and Line 2 are the lines named; no total count stated." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-6c46c958-82b9-4ba0-bf0f-363fd70b6dbc", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Line 1 and Line 2 are the lines named; no total count stated.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line (Line 1 / Line 2)\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Only Line 1 and Line 2 are named; no count was stated.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "stage kit (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Each stage is separately contended kit.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Four separate pieces of kit per line — mixer, mill, tint, fill head — each usable independently, with small holding tanks buffering between mix/mill and mill/fill." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ee4eb482-b4b3-4392-94d7-ef9dc0a6ca98", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Four separate pieces of kit per line — mixer, mill, tint, fill head — each usable independently, with small holding tanks buffering between mix/mill and mill/fill.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"stage kit (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Each stage is separately contended kit.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "boundary-condition", + "node": "demand book from ERP", + "slot": "the arrival or availability pattern", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Arrival source named; no rate or shape given yet, so precision is only 'named'.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Orders arrive as line items in the demand book when ERP spits it out, each with quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Orders arrive as line items in the demand book when ERP spits it out, each with quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"boundary-condition\",\"node\":\"demand book from ERP\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Arrival source named; no rate or shape given yet, so precision is only 'named'.\",\"slot\":\"the arrival or availability pattern\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Output of the allocation step.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is placed onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-32521b14-4f1e-41ff-ab95-dfc11d8eee37", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is placed onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Output of the allocation step.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Precondition named.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line item in the demand book from ERP, with quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line item in the demand book from ERP, with quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Precondition named.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The expert performs it himself.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The master scheduler (the expert), on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c1704cba-8451-47a5-add8-2e388b330a1f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The master scheduler (the expert), on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The expert performs it himself.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run the batch (mix/mill/tint/fill)", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The production run through the four stages.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is produced through the same four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack — and comes off the fill line." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-68ab39e5-8046-4f93-887e-11ed3e3b1da3", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is produced through the same four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack — and comes off the fill line.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run the batch (mix/mill/tint/fill)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The production run through the four stages.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run the batch (mix/mill/tint/fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "rationale": "The expert says the end-to-end batch time per SKU per line exists on his sheet but gave no figures in this range.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "the expert's scheduling sheet (roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line)" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c6d485c6-0e21-4cc0-b626-9091448d6ba1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"the expert's scheduling sheet (roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line)\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run the batch (mix/mill/tint/fill)\",\"rationale\":\"The expert says the end-to-end batch time per SKU per line exists on his sheet but gave no figures in this range.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run the batch (mix/mill/tint/fill)", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "rationale": "Stage-by-stage durations are not held by the expert; he names the historian as the source.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "the historian (stage-by-stage times: how long does mixing take, how long does milling take)" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "nobody's ever broken that down by \"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-663aaa9f-2bcb-4e01-937f-9d16ce860e80", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"the historian (stage-by-stage times: how long does mixing take, how long does milling take)\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run the batch (mix/mill/tint/fill)\",\"rationale\":\"Stage-by-stage durations are not held by the expert; he names the historian as the source.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"nobody's ever broken that down by \\\\\\\"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\\\\\\\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint stage", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Explicit variation by product type.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes — for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-737200bb-8f75-455f-b90a-3363a30d5fce", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes — for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint stage\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Explicit variation by product type.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Vague quantity as given — 'usually a few hours for a white'; not yet a spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Usually a few hours for a white; the specialty wait is much longer (figure not given)." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-78203b7c-8e00-469c-9d53-01d1a656d5c1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Usually a few hours for a white; the specialty wait is much longer (figure not given).\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Vague quantity as given — 'usually a few hours for a white'; not yet a spread.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Explicit contrast between white and specialty.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes — a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-86a1823e-ea26-45a4-b410-c9ecb6040ea3", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes — a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Explicit contrast between white and specialty.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The lab performs the check.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The lab (the order sits in the lab's queue and gets checked)." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ee79fe32-58f7-4a71-8c15-61f2fedc0a11", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The lab (the order sits in the lab's queue and gets checked).\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The lab performs the check.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "release and ship", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Terminal step.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-addb8fe4-ac6f-4c59-a6be-12d60d197a53", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Terminal step.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "number", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "A single figure given; not a spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-42e0a99d-6cf6-4b30-8199-b430405ba25b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"A single figure given; not a spread.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "precision": "number", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Named mode change (tint to white) with its stated loss.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours of crew time, and the line is out of anything else for that window." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a27c0fc1-57f3-4eed-bea8-15453c84f2da", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours of crew time, and the line is out of anything else for that window.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Named mode change (tint to white) with its stated loss.\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Trigger condition for the changeover.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line that has been running a tint being pulled onto a white." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0f6aea65-d3a4-430b-b532-4f1100303f9e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line that has been running a tint being pulled onto a white.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Trigger condition for the changeover.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Event effect on the line and the order in hand.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The line's filler goes down mid-run with an unknown ETA; the order on it stalls and must either wait or be shifted to the other line." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the tint order I bumped now might itself be late", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a3f706dd-453a-4543-9990-26efb1b079dd", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The line's filler goes down mid-run with an unknown ETA; the order on it stalls and must either wait or be shifted to the other line.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Event effect on the line and the order in hand.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the tint order I bumped now might itself be late\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Two named repair kinds bound the range; the recent instance was about two hours. Not yet a spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "From the \"half hour\" kind to the \"half a shift\" kind; the recent Line 2 jam came back in about two hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "it came back in about two hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-67de2e75-132c-43a7-b64e-412343204931", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"From the \\\"half hour\\\" kind to the \\\"half a shift\\\" kind; the recent Line 2 jam came back in about two hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Two named repair kinds bound the range; the recent instance was about two hours. Not yet a spread.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it came back in about two hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "order flow, allocate to ship", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The end-to-end order stated by the expert.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Allocate the order onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix / mill / tint / fill and pack → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if QA and shipping count as one, five if split." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-bf082835-a2ca-4279-80e5-726f157270bd", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Allocate the order onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix / mill / tint / fill and pack → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if QA and shipping count as one, five if split.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"order flow, allocate to ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The end-to-end order stated by the expert.\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "stage overlap on a line", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Overlap between consecutive orders on the same line, gated by tank space.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Stages can overlap between orders: the mixer may start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, provided the holding tank ahead (mix→mill or mill→fill) has space; the crew will take that head start when the tank ahead has room." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ce28dd53-a53d-4bc9-9956-dc3268c35e3e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Stages can overlap between orders: the mixer may start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, provided the holding tank ahead (mix→mill or mill→fill) has space; the crew will take that head start when the tank ahead has room.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"stage overlap on a line\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Overlap between consecutive orders on the same line, gated by tank space.\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "stage overlap on a line", + "slot": "how a branch or merge is decided", + "rationale": "The expert explicitly does not track how often overlap occurs or is blocked.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9b28544e-b867-4018-9c35-2691cef17a62", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"stage overlap on a line\",\"rationale\":\"The expert explicitly does not track how often overlap occurs or is blocked.\",\"slot\":\"how a branch or merge is decided\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "small holding tanks between stages", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Capacity and consequence stated qualitatively; the sizes themselves are not held by the expert.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The holding tanks between stages are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1. When a tank is full the upstream stage is blocked and mixing has to wait. Actual tank sizes not known to the expert; obtainable from engineering drawings." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4c4af9ea-df1a-4449-adb7-d48fce7eae93", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The holding tanks between stages are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1. When a tank is full the upstream stage is blocked and mixing has to wait. Actual tank sizes not known to the expert; obtainable from engineering drawings.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"small holding tanks between stages\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Capacity and consequence stated qualitatively; the sizes themselves are not held by the expert.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "published line rate", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "prescribed", + "rationale": "Engineering's position, recorded as the prescribed reading.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Engineering's position is that the line rate is what it is regardless of the tanks." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-dabdbb5f-9eca-4afb-ad50-5b381d9dfa4f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Engineering's position is that the line rate is what it is regardless of the tanks.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"published line rate\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Engineering's position, recorded as the prescribed reading.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"sourceRegime\":\"prescribed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "published line rate", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The expert's contrary practiced reading, recorded alongside engineering's.", + "assertion": { + "value": "In practice Line 1 feels sluggish and blocked in ways the published line rate does not account for; the expert suspects the mill-to-fill tank costs more than people admit, but has no proof." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it feels sluggish and blocked in ways I can't pin on the published line rate", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-292e1165-0990-4d17-b6db-153c675fd66c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"In practice Line 1 feels sluggish and blocked in ways the published line rate does not account for; the expert suspects the mill-to-fill tank costs more than people admit, but has no proof.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"published line rate\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The expert's contrary practiced reading, recorded alongside engineering's.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it feels sluggish and blocked in ways I can't pin on the published line rate\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "Meridian on time", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Hard constraint on the scheduling decision.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A Meridian-style order ships on time, full stop; it is not traded off against anything." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d509546d-b9bb-4b3b-b82d-a65b02b2f5dc", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A Meridian-style order ships on time, full stop; it is not traded off against anything.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"Meridian on time\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Hard constraint on the scheduling decision.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "Meridian on time", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Only exception stated.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Only when there is truly no way through." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-54d606d7-8c61-4f0a-bd5f-867bba1af3f7", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Only when there is truly no way through.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"Meridian on time\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Only exception stated.\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Practiced judgement about which customers can take lateness; examples given rather than a formula.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Judgement on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; another awkward account that gets prickly counts as a second problem created to solve the first." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I use judgment on who can absorb the slip", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b0a7a08e-c528-4592-ba81-e6026b3f356a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Judgement on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; another awkward account that gets prickly counts as a second problem created to solve the first.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Practiced judgement about which customers can take lateness; examples given rather than a formula.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I use judgment on who can absorb the slip\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "stage-by-stage times", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Named feed for stage durations.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — the historian." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "nobody's ever broken that down by \"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9dfaeda1-b5ff-4581-9c8b-d487fe7b9277", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — the historian.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"stage-by-stage times\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Named feed for stage durations.\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"nobody's ever broken that down by \\\\\\\"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\\\\\\\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "tank sizes", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Named source for the holding tank capacities.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Holding tank sizes — engineering drawings." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b0908788-ec79-4481-b056-1fa606930f85", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Holding tank sizes — engineering drawings.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"tank sizes\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Named source for the holding tank capacities.\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option loses less", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The model's primary question, stated as a disruption decision: with the filler down and ETA unknown, whether to wait or switch lines.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Given \"filler's down, ETA unknown\", tell me which option actually loses less — wait out the repair, or move the order to the other line — instead of doing gut math at the huddle." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d079be7f-20b9-4bb6-85e8-6ed631cb8057", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Given \\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\", tell me which option actually loses less — wait out the repair, or move the order to the other line — instead of doing gut math at the huddle.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The model's primary question, stated as a disruption decision: with the filler down and ETA unknown, whether to wait or switch lines.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'd love to type in \\\\\\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\\\\\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option loses less", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Lexicographic: on-time delivery for the protected order is a hard line; the remaining terms are weighed by judgment with no formula.", + "assertion": { + "value": "First: days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad news — non-negotiable, a line not crossed unless there is truly no way through. Underneath: washdown hours (crew time plus the line taken out of anything else for that window), and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much, judged against who the customer is. No formula — \"how bad is bad\" and judgment on who can absorb the slip." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \"cross the line\" situation. I don't have a formula for it.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9d5063d7-b9fb-400e-8b54-f618c6fde20e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"First: days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad news — non-negotiable, a line not crossed unless there is truly no way through. Underneath: washdown hours (crew time plus the line taken out of anything else for that window), and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much, judged against who the customer is. No formula — \\\"how bad is bad\\\" and judgment on who can absorb the slip.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Lexicographic: on-time delivery for the protected order is a hard line; the remaining terms are weighed by judgment with no formula.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \\\\\\\"cross the line\\\\\\\" situation. I don't have a formula for it.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option loses less", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The scorecard terms the expert named map onto the washdown, the production run, the breakdown event and the order itself.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "activity:tint-to-white washdown", + "activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "activity:filler jammed", + "entity-type:order", + "policy:who can absorb the slip" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window. And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-3245b29a-3687-4313-97c5-e0455e5889ba", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"activity:tint-to-white washdown\",\"activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"activity:filler jammed\",\"entity-type:order\",\"policy:who can absorb the slip\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option loses less\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The scorecard terms the expert named map onto the washdown, the production run, the breakdown event and the order itself.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'd love to type in \\\\\\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\\\\\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window. And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "where Line 1 loses its time", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Second, explicitly in-scope objective: show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing time, as evidence to take to engineering.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Show where Line 1 loses its time — in particular whether the small holding tank between mill and fill is actually costing us — with something other than a hunch to take to engineering." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If the model can actually show me \"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\" that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-225430d9-ae4d-4ef7-b439-6f9b1ccd50c5", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Show where Line 1 loses its time — in particular whether the small holding tank between mill and fill is actually costing us — with something other than a hunch to take to engineering.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"where Line 1 loses its time\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Second, explicitly in-scope objective: show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing time, as evidence to take to engineering.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If the model can actually show me \\\\\\\"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\\\\\\\" that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "where Line 1 loses its time", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The hunch is about blocking at the mill-to-fill tank, so it depends on the stage kit, the tank constraint and the run duration.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill", + "constraint:small holding tanks", + "activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "So yes — build it as separate stages if that's what it takes.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-770314e5-f47a-463e-908a-1d8c23ee60f5", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill\",\"constraint:small holding tanks\",\"activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"where Line 1 loses its time\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The hunch is about blocking at the mill-to-fill tank, so it depends on the stage kit, the tank constraint and the run duration.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So yes — build it as separate stages if that's what it takes.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The attributes the scheduler works from on the sheet.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Quantity, due date, SKU; plus the line and week-slot it is allocated to, and the customer account." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6ff1c59a-0664-487b-a946-2680043419a2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU; plus the line and week-slot it is allocated to, and the customer account.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The attributes the scheduler works from on the sheet.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Whites versus tints differ in stage content and in run speed by line; customer type differs in how a slip is judged.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Whites versus tints: for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step, and whites run much faster on Line 2 than Line 1 while tints run at nearly the same speed on both. Customers are treated apart too: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-be0c3675-ae93-41c5-9eaa-7d36d84617cb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Whites versus tints: for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step, and whites run much faster on Line 2 than Line 1 while tints run at nearly the same speed on both. Customers are treated apart too: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Whites versus tints differ in stage content and in run speed by line; customer type differs in how a slip is judged.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "Line 1 and Line 2", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The two lines are contended kit distinguished by speed, and the speed difference depends on product.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Line 1 and Line 2. Line 1 is the slower machine on whites — add maybe fifty, sixty percent to a Line 2 run (\"Line 2 is twice as fast\", which is really a whites number); on tints the two lines run at nearly the same speed." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3e2a5a8a-bd99-4642-afcf-f9d3dfe2e9f6", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Line 1 and Line 2. Line 1 is the slower machine on whites — add maybe fifty, sixty percent to a Line 2 run (\\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\", which is really a whites number); on tints the two lines run at nearly the same speed.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"Line 1 and Line 2\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The two lines are contended kit distinguished by speed, and the speed difference depends on product.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "mix, mill, tint, fill", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "prescribed", + "rationale": "The scheduling sheet's view: the line is one indivisible resource.", + "assertion": { + "value": "On the sheet the line is one row treated as one thing: the order occupies it for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it is done." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \"Line 2\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-e9bb0ea0-9052-4006-96ad-c166a1d3a957", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"On the sheet the line is one row treated as one thing: the order occupies it for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it is done.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"mix, mill, tint, fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The scheduling sheet's view: the line is one indivisible resource.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"prescribed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On the sheet, \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "mix, mill, tint, fill", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The floor view: four separately contended pieces of kit with buffering between them, allowing overlap.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Physically four separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last, if there is room in the holding tank — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-27ee0ed5-50d0-47f6-94b8-77e090bca50f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Physically four separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last, if there is room in the holding tank — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"mix, mill, tint, fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The floor view: four separately contended pieces of kit with buffering between them, allowing overlap.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "mix, mill, tint, fill", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user", + "pointer": "how much overlap happens and how often mixing is blocked by a full tank is not tracked by the scheduler" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-f8e69ae7-6d72-4e37-9b53-b67b47115db5", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\",\"pointer\":\"how much overlap happens and how often mixing is blocked by a full tank is not tracked by the scheduler\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"mix, mill, tint, fill\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "allocate → run → QA hold → release and ship", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The order's life from demand-book line item to shipment, as walked end to end.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill (and pack) → QA hold in the lab's queue → release, go to the warehouse and ship against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-2a491098-b602-4b46-bbaa-439e291027db", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill (and pack) → QA hold in the lab's queue → release, go to the warehouse and ship against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"allocate → run → QA hold → release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The order's life from demand-book line item to shipment, as walked end to end.\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Allocation binds the order to a line and a week slot, which is the scheduling decision under test.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is slotted onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c4aefe40-a022-4990-96a1-b74243850715", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is slotted onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Allocation binds the order to a line and a week slot, which is the scheduling decision under test.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order exists as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits it out, with quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-76c7250e-6575-4e31-b667-113f3a497cce", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order exists as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits it out, with quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order must first be allocated onto a line and a slot in the week." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7da94524-13b5-4c11-a1b4-9cb1b0f07e19", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order must first be allocated onto a line and a slot in the week.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Filled and packed product coming off the fill line, which then goes into QA hold." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c8f57cec-d8f5-42c0-9b99-29a1a71eab73", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Filled and packed product coming off the fill line, which then goes into QA hold.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Sheet-level, mix-to-last-pack, for a Meridian-sized white on Line 2; includes fill-up time getting the line running plus actual throughput. The bad tail is loosely folded-in filler hiccups and QA-adjacent time.", + "assertion": { + "value": "White, normal/Meridian-sized order, Line 2, mix-to-last-pack: typical 8–9 hours; one run in ten worse than 12–13 hours; one run in ten better than about 6 hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Bad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d6985d8d-f85e-4556-a091-df64be080ba6", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"White, normal/Meridian-sized order, Line 2, mix-to-last-pack: typical 8–9 hours; one run in ten worse than 12–13 hours; one run in ten better than about 6 hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"rationale\":\"Sheet-level, mix-to-last-pack, for a Meridian-sized white on Line 2; includes fill-up time getting the line running plus actual throughput. The bad tail is loosely folded-in filler hiccups and QA-adjacent time.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Bad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Same white order on the slower line.", + "assertion": { + "value": "White, same order, Line 1: typical 13–14 hours; worse days pushing 18-plus hours; best day maybe 10 hours — roughly fifty to sixty percent added to the Line 2 figures." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-97bc8f2b-2070-4c8a-8af4-7233caeef498", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"White, same order, Line 1: typical 13–14 hours; worse days pushing 18-plus hours; best day maybe 10 hours — roughly fifty to sixty percent added to the Line 2 figures.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"rationale\":\"Same white order on the slower line.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Only a typical range was given for tints; no one-in-ten tails.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Tint run, either line: 8–10 hours typical. No one-in-ten worse/better figures given." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-04a6f876-12f4-4f53-b6f2-f8e5fa9c87bc", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Tint run, either line: 8–10 hours typical. No one-in-ten worse/better figures given.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Only a typical range was given for tints; no one-in-ten tails.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Duration varies by product type and by line, and the two interact; the expert has no explanation for the tint parity.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes — duration varies both by product (white vs tint) and by line, and the two interact: whites are much slower on Line 1, tints run at nearly the same speed on both. \"I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them.\"" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "That's the \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-592b83e0-ece3-4e98-aedf-cdf70c202e96", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes — duration varies both by product (white vs tint) and by line, and the two interact: whites are much slower on Line 1, tints run at nearly the same speed on both. \\\"I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them.\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Duration varies by product type and by line, and the two interact; the expert has no explanation for the tint parity.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That's the \\\\\\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\\\\\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "precision": "number", + "rationale": "Named transition: tint to white on Line 1.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours for a tint-to-white changeover — real cost in crew time, and it takes the line out of anything else for that window." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-32fe7be9-75c7-464c-87cb-ca38fef4039b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours for a tint-to-white changeover — real cost in crew time, and it takes the line out of anything else for that window.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Named transition: tint to white on Line 1.\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line coming off a tint run and being switched to a white — pulling Line 1 off its tint to cover a white order." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-31556043-9787-40dc-8c0d-b74a47ed3589", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line coming off a tint run and being switched to a white — pulling Line 1 off its tint to cover a white order.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Only a vague magnitude was given; no typical or tail figures, and the specialty case is named but unquantified.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Usually a few hours for a white; \"nothing like the specialty wait\". No typical/tail figures given." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1f732daa-9626-420c-980f-5c2b88d9bff3", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Usually a few hours for a white; \\\"nothing like the specialty wait\\\". No typical/tail figures given.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Only a vague magnitude was given; no typical or tail figures, and the specialty case is named but unquantified.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "The lab — the order sits in the lab's queue and gets checked." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-2afae8eb-1155-4b07-9842-971df47a6a7d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The lab — the order sits in the lab's queue and gets checked.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jammed", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Two recognised repair kinds bracket the duration; the recent instance fell between them.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Two kinds of repair: the \"half hour\" kind and the \"half a shift\" kind. The most recent Line 2 filler jam came back in about two hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "it came back in about two hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d2d6e303-2f63-478a-ace1-0bf61abbfddd", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Two kinds of repair: the \\\"half hour\\\" kind and the \\\"half a shift\\\" kind. The most recent Line 2 filler jam came back in about two hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jammed\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Two recognised repair kinds bracket the duration; the recent instance fell between them.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it came back in about two hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jammed", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "An event that befalls the line mid-run and forces the switch-or-wait decision.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The line's filler stops mid-run with an unknown ETA, putting the order on it at risk and forcing a decision to wait out the repair or move the order to the other line." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-5548a18b-9f79-4475-a9ab-83a74c750721", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The line's filler stops mid-run with an unknown ETA, putting the order on it at risk and forcing a decision to wait out the repair or move the order to the other line.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jammed\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"An event that befalls the line mid-run and forces the switch-or-wait decision.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The practiced rule for choosing which order gets bumped when two cannot both be on time.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Protect the non-negotiable order's due date; for anything bumped, judge by how far it slips and who the customer is — a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first. No formula; judgment on who can absorb the slip." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1ee7c206-0c56-4d6b-b091-5861f9c40438", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Protect the non-negotiable order's due date; for anything bumped, judge by how far it slips and who the customer is — a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first. No formula; judgment on who can absorb the slip.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The practiced rule for choosing which order gets bumped when two cannot both be on time.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The on-time line is crossed only when there is truly no way through." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4b706f60-c02f-4973-aa58-2d3ded113c39", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The on-time line is crossed only when there is truly no way through.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "small holding tanks", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Consequence is stated (upstream stage waits); the numeric capacity is not held by the expert.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The holding tanks between stages are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1. When a tank is full the upstream stage is blocked and mixing has to wait; overlap is only possible if the tank ahead has space. Suspected to cost more than people admit, never proven." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-97ea5a05-d89c-4a7d-a136-f90526beaa27", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The holding tanks between stages are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1. When a tank is full the upstream stage is blocked and mixing has to wait; overlap is only possible if the tank ahead has space. Suspected to cost more than people admit, never proven.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"small holding tanks\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Consequence is stated (upstream stage waits); the numeric capacity is not held by the expert.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "small holding tanks", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "engineering drawings — tank sizes obtainable from engineering, not carried in the scheduler's head" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6d66bc49-da1a-49e3-8d98-e5d732b6e4bb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"engineering drawings — tank sizes obtainable from engineering, not carried in the scheduler's head\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"small holding tanks\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "stage-by-stage rates from the historian", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Stage-level durations are needed for the separate-stage model and exist only in the historian.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — feed: the plant historian; never pulled apart, not known to the scheduler." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "nobody's ever broken that down by \"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-46d37104-fb87-4105-95d5-4448aade81ac", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — feed: the plant historian; never pulled apart, not known to the scheduler.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"stage-by-stage rates from the historian\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Stage-level durations are needed for the separate-stage model and exist only in the historian.\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"nobody's ever broken that down by \\\\\\\"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\\\\\\\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "validation-criterion", + "node": "the sheet's end-to-end batch times", + "slot": "how the expert would know the model is right", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The only figures the expert holds first-hand are sheet-level end-to-end times per SKU per line; engineering's counter-claim is that the line rate is what it is regardless of the tanks.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The model's end-to-end batch time for a given SKU on each line should match what the scheduler's sheet shows; and it would have to speak to engineering's claim that \"the line rate is what it is regardless\"." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0cdda695-1dfa-43ef-971c-b9db09403a07", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The model's end-to-end batch time for a given SKU on each line should match what the scheduler's sheet shows; and it would have to speak to engineering's claim that \\\"the line rate is what it is regardless\\\".\"},\"kind\":\"validation-criterion\",\"node\":\"the sheet's end-to-end batch times\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The only figures the expert holds first-hand are sheet-level end-to-end times per SKU per line; engineering's counter-claim is that the line rate is what it is regardless of the tanks.\",\"slot\":\"how the expert would know the model is right\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The expert's stated use: type in a disruption state and be told which of switch-or-wait loses less.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Given a disruption like \"filler's down, ETA unknown\", tell me which option actually loses less — shift the order to the other line or wait out the repair — instead of doing gut math at the huddle." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a5926e2a-88e8-459e-a296-282b16d499a8", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Given a disruption like \\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\", tell me which option actually loses less — shift the order to the other line or wait out the repair — instead of doing gut math at the huddle.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The expert's stated use: type in a disruption state and be told which of switch-or-wait loses less.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'd love to type in \\\\\\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\\\\\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Hard constraint plus unweighted secondary terms; the expert explicitly denies having a formula.", + "assertion": { + "value": "First number: days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad — on-time is non-negotiable, a line not crossed unless there's truly no way through. Underneath that: washdown hours (crew time, line taken out of anything else for that window) and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and who the customer is. No formula — judgment on who can absorb the slip." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through. So the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \"cross the line\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \"how bad is bad\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ea1779b0-9a83-42aa-92d1-746e73de43cc", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"First number: days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad — on-time is non-negotiable, a line not crossed unless there's truly no way through. Underneath that: washdown hours (crew time, line taken out of anything else for that window) and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and who the customer is. No formula — judgment on who can absorb the slip.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Hard constraint plus unweighted secondary terms; the expert explicitly denies having a formula.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \\\\\\\"cross the line\\\\\\\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \\\\\\\"how bad is bad\\\\\\\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through. So the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The scorecard terms name the run, the jam, the washdown, the order type and the flow.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "activity:filler jam", + "activity:tint-to-white washdown", + "entity-type:order (line item in the demand book)", + "entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2", + "ordering/flow:allocate → run → QA hold → release and ship", + "policy:who can absorb the slip" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-1288a3df-c7fd-4319-8d4e-a228572ba0b0", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"activity:filler jam\",\"activity:tint-to-white washdown\",\"entity-type:order (line item in the demand book)\",\"entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2\",\"ordering/flow:allocate → run → QA hold → release and ship\",\"policy:who can absorb the slip\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The scorecard terms name the run, the jam, the washdown, the order type and the flow.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "where Line 1 loses its time", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Second in-scope question: whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing time.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Show where Line 1 loses its time — in particular whether the small holding tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is costing more than the published line rate admits, so it can be taken to engineering as something other than a hunch." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If the model can actually show me \"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\" that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4be8c533-88e3-4f97-bcef-9b445cfeb3e6", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Show where Line 1 loses its time — in particular whether the small holding tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is costing more than the published line rate admits, so it can be taken to engineering as something other than a hunch.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"where Line 1 loses its time\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Second in-scope question: whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing time.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If the model can actually show me \\\\\\\"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\\\\\\\" that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "where Line 1 loses its time", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The tank question depends on the stage kit and the holding-tank constraint.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill stages", + "constraint:small holding tanks between stages", + "activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So yes — build it as separate stages if that's what it takes.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-bb291ebf-9fe0-4a6e-9840-e7d7fac44033", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill stages\",\"constraint:small holding tanks between stages\",\"activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"where Line 1 loses its time\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The tank question depends on the stage kit and the holding-tank constraint.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So yes — build it as separate stages if that's what it takes.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order (line item in the demand book)", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Whites vs tints differ in the tint stage and in run time by line; customer identity differs in slip tolerance.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Orders are line items with quantity, due date and SKU. Treated apart: whites (tint stage barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step) vs tints (real letdown); and by customer — a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-edfaf81c-c276-4b57-a88c-914953b1c6be", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Orders are line items with quantity, due date and SKU. Treated apart: whites (tint stage barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step) vs tints (real letdown); and by customer — a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order (line item in the demand book)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Whites vs tints differ in the tint stage and in run time by line; customer identity differs in slip tolerance.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order (line item in the demand book)", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Quantity, due date, SKU come from ERP; customer type is used in the slip judgement; line allocation is set at step one.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Quantity, due date, SKU; the customer (distributor / small account / awkward account); which line and week-slot it has been allocated to; whether it has gone late and by how many days." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-13339551-ff3a-414f-8260-e1296530d8ec", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU; the customer (distributor / small account / awkward account); which line and week-slot it has been allocated to; whether it has gone late and by how many days.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order (line item in the demand book)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU come from ERP; customer type is used in the slip judgement; line allocation is set at step one.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "Line 1 and Line 2", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The two lines differ on whites but not on tints — load-bearing for switch-or-wait.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Line 1 and Line 2. Line 1 is the slower machine on whites — add maybe fifty, sixty percent to Line 2's figures (\"Line 2 is twice as fast\", though that's really a whites number). On tints they run at nearly the same speed." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-535749ea-ba99-4d11-84c0-8203fd058329", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Line 1 and Line 2. Line 1 is the slower machine on whites — add maybe fifty, sixty percent to Line 2's figures (\\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\", though that's really a whites number). On tints they run at nearly the same speed.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"Line 1 and Line 2\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The two lines differ on whites but not on tints — load-bearing for switch-or-wait.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "mix, mill, tint, fill stages", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The floor's account: four separately contended pieces of kit per line, buffered by small holding tanks.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, has room." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-79eccb7f-a787-40d4-a2fa-e95bfda82d18", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, has room.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"mix, mill, tint, fill stages\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The floor's account: four separately contended pieces of kit per line, buffered by small holding tanks.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "mix, mill, tint, fill stages", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Stage counts per line and tank sizes not carried by the expert; source named.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "engineering drawings (tank sizes) — expert does not carry them in his head" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I don't have clean numbers for tank sizes or stage-by-stage rates.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3c6b3e85-7fd3-4831-9201-6e3ef525e7cf", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"engineering drawings (tank sizes) — expert does not carry them in his head\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"mix, mill, tint, fill stages\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Stage counts per line and tank sizes not carried by the expert; source named.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I don't have clean numbers for tank sizes or stage-by-stage rates.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "boundary-condition", + "node": "demand book from ERP", + "slot": "the starting state", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Orders enter the scheduler's world as ERP-generated demand-book line items.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Orders arrive as line items in the demand book once ERP spits that out, carrying quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-f1eca8a3-a2c2-4d92-a428-763c67e7b02a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Orders arrive as line items in the demand book once ERP spits that out, carrying quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"boundary-condition\",\"node\":\"demand book from ERP\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Orders enter the scheduler's world as ERP-generated demand-book line items.\",\"slot\":\"the starting state\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Allocation fixes line and week-slot on the sheet.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is slotted onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-823c9593-db42-45eb-9515-937e6b90bd33", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is slotted onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Allocation fixes line and week-slot on the sheet.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The expert himself, as master scheduler, does the slotting on the sheet.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The master scheduler, on the sheet" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 1, + "entryEnd": 1 + }, + "source": "user" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-f7e12936-7567-4b38-be19-a45fb5dc6274", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The master scheduler, on the sheet\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The expert himself, as master scheduler, does the slotting on the sheet.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":1,\\\"entryStart\\\":1,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Allocation follows the ERP demand-book line item existing.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line item in the demand book from ERP, with quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-c27fb36e-eb7f-42be-b6ef-c5dd9e9283e2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line item in the demand book from ERP, with quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Allocation follows the ERP demand-book line item existing.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "allocate → run → QA hold → release and ship", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The expert's own end-to-end sequence for one order.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill (mix, mill, tint, fill and pack) → QA hold in the lab's queue → release, warehouse, and ship against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-5755b52c-e250-4fae-9c9b-ac6eba42d092", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill (mix, mill, tint, fill and pack) → QA hold in the lab's queue → release, warehouse, and ship against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"allocate → run → QA hold → release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The expert's own end-to-end sequence for one order.\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "A run needs the order allocated to a line and that line's kit available.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order must have been allocated onto a line and a slot in the week, and the line's kit (mix, mill, tint, fill) available." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-afd366c9-1ea6-4b73-b2c0-ed97c9af0c79", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order must have been allocated onto a line and a slot in the week, and the line's kit (mix, mill, tint, fill) available.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"A run needs the order allocated to a line and that line's kit available.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Output is finished, packed product that comes off the fill line into QA hold.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is produced through mix, mill, tint, fill and pack; it comes off the fill line as packed product ready for QA hold." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Then it actually has to get produced — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-86fd1cfb-379b-42f7-bdbb-8586dae7f755", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is produced through mix, mill, tint, fill and pack; it comes off the fill line as packed product ready for QA hold.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Output is finished, packed product that comes off the fill line into QA hold.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it actually has to get produced — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The run is performed by whichever line the order is allocated to, with its crew.", + "assertion": { + "value": "entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2 — the line the order is slotted onto, plus its crew" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-90d36431-4341-4f9e-8bf6-8b5354b2fedd", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2 — the line the order is slotted onto, plus its crew\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The run is performed by whichever line the order is allocated to, with its crew.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "First-pass spread for a Meridian-sized white on Line 2, mix-to-last-pack, with breakdowns folded in loosely; superseded by the clean-run capture.", + "assertion": { + "value": "White, Meridian-sized order, Line 2, mix-to-last-pack (includes fill-up time plus throughput): typical eight to nine hours; one in ten worse than twelve to thirteen hours (breakdowns folded in loosely); one in ten better than about six hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size. That includes fill-up time getting the line running plus the actual throughput.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Bad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours, and that's usually not the run itself slowing down, that's more \"the filler hiccupped twice\" or QA-adjacent stuff creeping in, though I'm folding some of that in loosely.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7ef3368b-e678-4c58-b7f9-137d1607d8ec", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"White, Meridian-sized order, Line 2, mix-to-last-pack (includes fill-up time plus throughput): typical eight to nine hours; one in ten worse than twelve to thirteen hours (breakdowns folded in loosely); one in ten better than about six hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"rationale\":\"First-pass spread for a Meridian-sized white on Line 2, mix-to-last-pack, with breakdowns folded in loosely; superseded by the clean-run capture.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Bad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours, and that's usually not the run itself slowing down, that's more \\\\\\\"the filler hiccupped twice\\\\\\\" or QA-adjacent stuff creeping in, though I'm folding some of that in loosely.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size. That includes fill-up time getting the line running plus the actual throughput.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Superseding capture: breakdown time stripped out so filler jams are not double-counted; clean-run variability is small.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Clean run (nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup), white on Line 2: typical eight or nine hours; one in ten worse than nine to ten hours (normal slack, someone slow changing a roll of packaging film); one in ten better than about six hours. The twelve-to-thirteen-hour days are breakdowns showing up inside the run, not the run being slow." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup, nothing — a clean run doesn't really vary that much from typical. Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-10d88b79-af70-4a14-90c1-da56ad526d36", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Clean run (nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup), white on Line 2: typical eight or nine hours; one in ten worse than nine to ten hours (normal slack, someone slow changing a roll of packaging film); one in ten better than about six hours. The twelve-to-thirteen-hour days are breakdowns showing up inside the run, not the run being slow.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"rationale\":\"Superseding capture: breakdown time stripped out so filler jams are not double-counted; clean-run variability is small.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup, nothing — a clean run doesn't really vary that much from typical. Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "P07: run duration varies both by product type and by line, and the two interact.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes. White on Line 1: add maybe fifty, sixty percent to the Line 2 figures — typical thirteen to fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten (this is where \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" comes from, and that's really a whites number). Tints: Line 1 and Line 2 run them at nearly the same speed — eight to ten hours typical on either line. No good reason known for why; it's what the sheet has always shown." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-921611c3-21b5-4ab2-8e56-9b8cdaa2eba2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes. White on Line 1: add maybe fifty, sixty percent to the Line 2 figures — typical thirteen to fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten (this is where \\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\" comes from, and that's really a whites number). Tints: Line 1 and Line 2 run them at nearly the same speed — eight to ten hours typical on either line. No good reason known for why; it's what the sheet has always shown.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"P07: run duration varies both by product type and by line, and the two interact.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert gave two named repair kinds and one recent instance; no quantiles yet, so range not spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Either the \"half hour\" kind or the \"half a shift\" kind of repair; the recent Line 2 instance came back in about two hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6cf8c229-ab84-4448-abc6-3e7f4a76bb4c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Either the \\\"half hour\\\" kind or the \\\"half a shift\\\" kind of repair; the recent Line 2 instance came back in about two hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Expert gave two named repair kinds and one recent instance; no quantiles yet, so range not spread.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The jam halts the line's fill stage and forces the switch-or-wait decision.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The filler stops and the run stalls — the line loses time (half a shift lost in the recent case), the in-progress order's finish is pushed out, and the scheduler must decide whether to shift the order to the other line or wait out the repair." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ce789325-dd40-4b21-a936-73485ccb90b9", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The filler stops and the run stalls — the line loses time (half a shift lost in the recent case), the in-progress order's finish is pushed out, and the scheduler must decide whether to shift the order to the other line or wait out the repair.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The jam halts the line's fill stage and forces the switch-or-wait decision.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "precision": "number", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "P02: named transition (tint to white) with a stated loss; a single figure, not a spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours of washdown — crew time, and it takes the line out of anything else for that window." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1ba32034-be19-432b-a012-326b682fd357", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours of washdown — crew time, and it takes the line out of anything else for that window.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"P02: named transition (tint to white) with a stated loss; a single figure, not a spread.\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Triggered by pulling a line off a tint run to run a white.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line that is mid-run or last-run on a tint being pulled onto a white — the changeover from tint to white." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-526685d5-3021-40f4-8cb9-a4e8d92002b7", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line that is mid-run or last-run on a tint being pulled onto a white — the changeover from tint to white.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Triggered by pulling a line off a tint run to run a white.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "named", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Vague quantifier — \"usually a few hours\" for a white — not yet quantiles; specialty products wait longer.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Usually a few hours for a white; \"nothing like the specialty wait\" — specialty products wait longer (amount not given)." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-35f88f0f-1e4e-44a3-9d47-33c6942a9b16", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Usually a few hours for a white; \\\"nothing like the specialty wait\\\" — specialty products wait longer (amount not given).\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Vague quantifier — \\\"usually a few hours\\\" for a white — not yet quantiles; specialty products wait longer.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "QA check gates release to warehouse and shipping.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The batch is checked and then released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-e28ed067-b6a4-40d8-935a-3598e2401cc1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The batch is checked and then released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"QA check gates release to warehouse and shipping.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The lab holds the queue and does the check.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The lab" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a3d8c0b7-97bf-443d-aa86-8fef8ea0bd5a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The lab\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The lab holds the queue and does the check.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "a line is occupied for the whole run", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "prescribed", + "rationale": "P08: the scheduling sheet's rule, which the expert says lies to him a bit.", + "assertion": { + "value": "On the sheet, a line is one row: the order occupies that line for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it till it's done." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \"Line 2\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4e68a0cf-eccb-4b69-91f0-c7fb74a2b639", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"On the sheet, a line is one row: the order occupies that line for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it till it's done.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"a line is occupied for the whole run\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"P08: the scheduling sheet's rule, which the expert says lies to him a bit.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"prescribed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On the sheet, \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "a line is occupied for the whole run", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "P08 divergence: floor practice overlaps stages when buffer space allows.", + "assertion": { + "value": "On the floor the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space — the mixer can start the next order while the fill head finishes the last one. How much overlap happens, and how often it is blocked because a tank is full, is not tracked." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-cfe5bf57-8879-4592-a938-1527d73c8bac", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"On the floor the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space — the mixer can start the next order while the fill head finishes the last one. How much overlap happens, and how often it is blocked because a tank is full, is not tracked.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"a line is occupied for the whole run\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"P08 divergence: floor practice overlaps stages when buffer space allows.\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The practiced rule for choosing which order to bump; explicitly judgement, not formula.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Judgment on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; another awkward account that gets prickly creates a second problem. No formula — \"how bad is bad\" for the second-order stuff." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I use judgment on who can absorb the slip", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b3079749-c23b-4ade-ac51-9bbff19806fb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Judgment on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; another awkward account that gets prickly creates a second problem. No formula — \\\"how bad is bad\\\" for the second-order stuff.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The practiced rule for choosing which order to bump; explicitly judgement, not formula.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I use judgment on who can absorb the slip\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The hard on-time line overrides the slip-absorption weighing.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The Meridian-style on-time line overrides everything: that order shipping on time is non-negotiable unless there's truly no way through." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-e7d9cbf7-5a12-4e04-8fbf-b2b0581efa5d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The Meridian-style on-time line overrides everything: that order shipping on time is non-negotiable unless there's truly no way through.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The hard on-time line overrides the slip-absorption weighing.\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "small holding tanks between stages", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "named", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Consequence named (mixing has to wait when the tank ahead is full) but the capacities themselves are not held by the expert; source named.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "engineering drawings — tank sizes; consequence as stated: the tanks are small, especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1, and when a tank is full mixing has to wait" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it, and engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-23c5706e-37c1-481e-9438-8fae70973c13", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"engineering drawings — tank sizes; consequence as stated: the tanks are small, especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1, and when a tank is full mixing has to wait\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"small holding tanks between stages\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Consequence named (mixing has to wait when the tank ahead is full) but the capacities themselves are not held by the expert; source named.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it, and engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "stage-by-stage durations from the historian", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Stage-level rates exist as data but not in the expert's head; feed named.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) per SKU and line — feed: the historian. Never pulled apart; only end-to-end batch time per SKU per line is on the scheduling sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet, but nobody's ever broken that down by \"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-00863ee1-f99c-48b2-b680-bf4eb71e6a57", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) per SKU and line — feed: the historian. Never pulled apart; only end-to-end batch time per SKU per line is on the scheduling sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"stage-by-stage durations from the historian\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Stage-level rates exist as data but not in the expert's head; feed named.\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet, but nobody's ever broken that down by \\\\\\\"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\\\\\\\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "validation-criterion", + "node": "stage rates must come from data, not gut-feel", + "slot": "how the expert would know the model is right", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Expert explicitly bounds what his own testimony can support.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Stage-level rates and tank sizes must not be taken from the expert's gut-feel — he can supply gut-feel and known bottleneck stories, but real numbers must come from the historian and engineering drawings." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Don't assume I can hand you clean stage rates — I can give you gut-feel and known bottleneck stories, but not real numbers off the top of my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-196b8447-3958-444f-9860-8de7330299ec", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Stage-level rates and tank sizes must not be taken from the expert's gut-feel — he can supply gut-feel and known bottleneck stories, but real numbers must come from the historian and engineering drawings.\"},\"kind\":\"validation-criterion\",\"node\":\"stage rates must come from data, not gut-feel\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert explicitly bounds what his own testimony can support.\",\"slot\":\"how the expert would know the model is right\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Don't assume I can hand you clean stage rates — I can give you gut-feel and known bottleneck stories, but not real numbers off the top of my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "switch or wait when Line 2 goes down", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The expert wrote the question as he would type it into the tool.", + "assertion": { + "value": "\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b58883f3-43e2-4626-bc59-a9c091f1d1b5", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"\\\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"switch or wait when Line 2 goes down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The expert wrote the question as he would type it into the tool.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "switch or wait when Line 2 goes down", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The expert listed what the answer hangs on: the protected run and its due date, the state of Line 1, the changeover and its direction, the jam duration, and whose order gets bumped.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "entity-type:order", + "entity-type:line", + "activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "activity:tint-to-white washdown", + "activity:filler jam", + "policy:who can absorb the slip" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way). It hangs on the jam itself", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the bumped order's identity matters, not just \"an order got delayed.\"", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3aa3764b-8dd5-495a-bf3e-b32cbc89ba61", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"entity-type:order\",\"entity-type:line\",\"activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"activity:tint-to-white washdown\",\"activity:filler jam\",\"policy:who can absorb the slip\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"switch or wait when Line 2 goes down\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The expert listed what the answer hangs on: the protected run and its due date, the state of Line 1, the changeover and its direction, the jam duration, and whose order gets bumped.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the bumped order's identity matters, not just \\\\\\\"an order got delayed.\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way). It hangs on the jam itself\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "switch or wait when Line 2 goes down", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert gave a lexicographic hard constraint plus unweighted second-order criteria, explicitly denying a formula.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Hard line: days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad news. Underneath that, weighed by judgment with no formula: washdown hours, and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and for which customer." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \"cross the line\" situation. I don't have a formula for it.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-57ad71c3-f423-4d91-a9f8-d3ce31f1fca1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Hard line: days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad news. Underneath that, weighed by judgment with no formula: washdown hours, and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and for which customer.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"switch or wait when Line 2 goes down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert gave a lexicographic hard constraint plus unweighted second-order criteria, explicitly denying a formula.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \\\\\\\"cross the line\\\\\\\" situation. I don't have a formula for it.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Second question the expert wrote out as he would type it.", + "assertion": { + "value": "\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\"" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1a3325b9-15b6-436a-8e7f-feff95d98036", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"\\\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Second question the expert wrote out as he would type it.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Expert named stage-level rates on Line 1, the tank size between mill and fill, and per-SKU stage differences.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "entity-type:the four stages — mix, mill, tint, fill", + "constraint:small holding tank between mill and fill on Line 1", + "entity-type:order", + "entity-type:line" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "different SKUs are slow at different stages, so the tank might matter a lot for some products and not at all for others", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0e28490a-6b4b-4996-9b6f-3d9249a7d2dc", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"entity-type:the four stages — mix, mill, tint, fill\",\"constraint:small holding tank between mill and fill on Line 1\",\"entity-type:order\",\"entity-type:line\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Expert named stage-level rates on Line 1, the tank size between mill and fill, and per-SKU stage differences.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"different SKUs are slow at different stages, so the tank might matter a lot for some products and not at all for others\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Expert named the fields the order carries from the demand book and the state he consults mid-disruption.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Quantity, due date, SKU; remaining quantity as it runs; the customer it belongs to; how far through it is; which line and slot it is allocated to." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "whose order was it — that's the \"who can absorb it\" judgment call again", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-43c5ef42-68ce-478f-89b0-c552111d807a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU; remaining quantity as it runs; the customer it belongs to; how far through it is; which line and slot it is allocated to.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert named the fields the order carries from the demand book and the state he consults mid-disruption.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"whose order was it — that's the \\\\\\\"who can absorb it\\\\\\\" judgment call again\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The process treats whites and tints differently at the tint stage and in run times; customer type changes how a slip is judged.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Whites versus tints (for a white the tint stage is barely there, a pass-through); and by customer type — distributor, small account, or an awkward account that gets prickly." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ccc2d7eb-8a3f-4684-8f1c-a21a51049550", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Whites versus tints (for a white the tint stage is barely there, a pass-through); and by customer type — distributor, small account, or an awkward account that gets prickly.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The process treats whites and tints differently at the tint stage and in run times; customer type changes how a slip is judged.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "prescribed", + "rationale": "The sheet's representation of a line, which the expert says 'lies to me a bit'.", + "assertion": { + "value": "On the scheduling sheet a line is one row and one resource: an order occupies Line 2 for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it is done." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \"Line 2\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a7cac8dd-02ea-4fc2-9b07-981ba2152a06", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"On the scheduling sheet a line is one row and one resource: an order occupies Line 2 for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it is done.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The sheet's representation of a line, which the expert says 'lies to me a bit'.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"prescribed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On the sheet, \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "the four stages — mix, mill, tint, fill", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The floor's version of the line: four contended stages with buffers, not one resource.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Physically mix, mill, tint and fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head finishes the last one if the tank ahead has space." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a158a5da-be3a-461f-87c0-69c38cac1a72", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Physically mix, mill, tint and fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head finishes the last one if the tank ahead has space.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"the four stages — mix, mill, tint, fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The floor's version of the line: four contended stages with buffers, not one resource.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "the four stages — mix, mill, tint, fill", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Count of stages is stated; occupancy/blocking frequency is explicitly untracked.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Four stages in series per line — mix, mill, tint, fill — with small holding tanks between them; how often blocking occurs is not tracked." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4c582a37-42ed-4d72-a3dd-5a15a6048a23", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Four stages in series per line — mix, mill, tint, fill — with small holding tanks between them; how often blocking occurs is not tracked.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"the four stages — mix, mill, tint, fill\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Count of stages is stated; occupancy/blocking frequency is explicitly untracked.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Expert's step one.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is slotted onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4043a577-c1b4-44c3-91f3-2194def82bd9", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is slotted onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert's step one.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Precondition named in the walkthrough.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line item in the demand book, produced by ERP, carrying quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line item in the demand book, produced by ERP, carrying quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Precondition named in the walkthrough.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "boundary-condition", + "node": "demand book from ERP", + "slot": "the starting state", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "External source of work into the scheduling process.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Orders exist as line items in the demand book, each with quantity, due date and SKU, once ERP produces it." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Orders exist as line items in the demand book, each with quantity, due date and SKU, once ERP produces it.\"},\"kind\":\"boundary-condition\",\"node\":\"demand book from ERP\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"External source of work into the scheduling process.\",\"slot\":\"the starting state\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert corrected his first spread to strip out jams, so the clean-run figure supersedes; no one-in-ten-better figure was given for the clean run.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Meridian-sized white on Line 2, clean run (nothing breaks): typically eight to nine hours mix-to-last-pack; a bad-but-clean day nine to ten hours. Clean-run variability is small; the twelve-to-thirteen-hour bad days are breakdowns showing up inside the run and are modelled separately." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-72d414e6-f6a2-420e-8407-667f41535411", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Meridian-sized white on Line 2, clean run (nothing breaks): typically eight to nine hours mix-to-last-pack; a bad-but-clean day nine to ten hours. Clean-run variability is small; the twelve-to-thirteen-hour bad days are breakdowns showing up inside the run and are modelled separately.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Expert corrected his first spread to strip out jams, so the clean-run figure supersedes; no one-in-ten-better figure was given for the clean run.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Durations vary by line and by white-versus-tint; the Line 1 figures were given before the clean-run/breakdown split and may still fold in stoppages.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes. Same white order on Line 1 is about fifty to sixty percent longer than Line 2 — typical thirteen to fourteen hours, worse days eighteen-plus, best day about ten. Tints run at nearly the same speed on either line, about eight to ten hours typical, with no big gap; the 'Line 2 is twice as fast' rule is really a whites number." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0958f3c5-59f7-4139-8942-fc5204d9d5dc", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes. Same white order on Line 1 is about fifty to sixty percent longer than Line 2 — typical thirteen to fourteen hours, worse days eighteen-plus, best day about ten. Tints run at nearly the same speed on either line, about eight to ten hours typical, with no big gap; the 'Line 2 is twice as fast' rule is really a whites number.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Durations vary by line and by white-versus-tint; the Line 1 figures were given before the clean-run/breakdown split and may still fold in stoppages.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Runs are performed on a named line; the expert compares Line 1 and Line 2 as the performing kit.", + "assertion": { + "value": "One of the two production lines (Line 1 or Line 2) with its crew." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap. I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-53f9387d-f037-4d0f-999b-f89a8f113f46", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"One of the two production lines (Line 1 or Line 2) with its crew.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Runs are performed on a named line; the expert compares Line 1 and Line 2 as the performing kit.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap. I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Named performer in the walkthrough.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The lab." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d7faeb42-3fb6-4e39-a4db-a4c0fb8430f1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The lab.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Named performer in the walkthrough.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Only a vague 'few hours' was given; not yet a range or spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Usually a few hours for a white; explicitly longer for specialty ('nothing like the specialty wait'), figure not given." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-38e0effa-0fb7-48ff-907c-2fc9f3e64211", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Usually a few hours for a white; explicitly longer for specialty ('nothing like the specialty wait'), figure not given.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Only a vague 'few hours' was given; not yet a range or spread.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "release and ship", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Final step of the walkthrough.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against its due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9b796f7a-c77b-45a7-83f7-806c40aaf58f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against its due date.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Final step of the walkthrough.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "order life on the floor", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Expert's own summary of the end-to-end sequence.", + "assertion": { + "value": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-314d8187-81ba-478c-8f71-1c9e5826965b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"order life on the floor\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert's own summary of the end-to-end sequence.\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "number", + "rationale": "Single figure given for the tint-to-white washdown; no spread elicited.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-345fbb5a-c0c1-4e3a-9015-33b3ad727831", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Single figure given for the tint-to-white washdown; no spread elicited.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Changeover is directional and triggered by the family of what was running versus what is coming.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A changeover between product families on the same line; the direction decides the cost — tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-60f6f8c8-f52e-443a-adee-6818339f3b35", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A changeover between product families on the same line; the direction decides the cost — tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Changeover is directional and triggered by the family of what was running versus what is coming.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Stated consequence of the washdown.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The line is cleaned from tint to white and is taken out of anything else for that window; it costs crew time." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-be556841-bf14-4fe0-8c23-ffc773896b2b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The line is cleaned from tint to white and is taken out of anything else for that window; it costs crew time.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated consequence of the washdown.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "rationale": "Loss is named and affirmed as material but no quantity is held by the expert.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user", + "pointer": "ramp scrap after the washdown — real product lost on top of the hours; expert has no good numbers" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-26d3ac6c-4b27-4765-baa3-8437f06fe8ca", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\",\"pointer\":\"ramp scrap after the washdown — real product lost on top of the hours; expert has no good numbers\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"rationale\":\"Loss is named and affirmed as material but no quantity is held by the expert.\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert gave two named kinds of repair plus one observed instance; no typical or decile figures yet.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Between the 'half hour' kind and the 'half a shift' kind; the recent Line 2 case came back in about two hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-da6d10a4-e0f2-4b1d-8e78-4d58cadeb8f2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Between the 'half hour' kind and the 'half a shift' kind; the recent Line 2 case came back in about two hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Expert gave two named kinds of repair plus one observed instance; no typical or decile figures yet.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Event-shaped activity that befalls the line, distinct from the run itself.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The filler stops mid-run and the line is down for the repair; the run in progress stretches (the twelve-to-thirteen-hour bad days), and the scheduler must decide to wait or shift the order to the other line." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-68f9db28-a002-406d-912a-4cc410e5b380", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The filler stops mid-run and the line is down for the repair; the run in progress stretches (the twelve-to-thirteen-hour bad days), and the scheduler must decide to wait or shift the order to the other line.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Event-shaped activity that befalls the line, distinct from the run itself.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step", + "rationale": "No rate was stated; recording the gap rather than inferring one from the single incident.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user", + "pointer": "frequency of filler jams was not given; expert spoke only to duration uncertainty at the time of the jam" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "how long is this repair *actually* going to take, which I never know at the time, so really it needs some sense of \"could be quick, could be long\" rather than one number", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0a06d184-bf72-42c4-95b3-7ad88ea4e059", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\",\"pointer\":\"frequency of filler jams was not given; expert spoke only to duration uncertainty at the time of the jam\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"rationale\":\"No rate was stated; recording the gap rather than inferring one from the single incident.\",\"slot\":\"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"how long is this repair *actually* going to take, which I never know at the time, so really it needs some sense of \\\\\\\"could be quick, could be long\\\\\\\" rather than one number\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The tacit rule for choosing which order to bump; no formula, judged on customer identity and size of slip.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Judgment on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first, so it is protected." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I use judgment on who can absorb the slip", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3fec05b6-fd93-4759-9598-7870f4f98d7f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Judgment on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first, so it is protected.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The tacit rule for choosing which order to bump; no formula, judged on customer identity and size of slip.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I use judgment on who can absorb the slip\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Hard constraint sitting above the absorb-the-slip judgment.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The protected order's on-time ship date overrides: shipping Meridian on time is a line he won't cross unless there's truly no way through." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-091d909a-fbcd-4630-bc2d-97bca63e4c7b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The protected order's on-time ship date overrides: shipping Meridian on time is a line he won't cross unless there's truly no way through.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Hard constraint sitting above the absorb-the-slip judgment.\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "small holding tank between mill and fill on Line 1", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Qualitative blocking rule stated; the numeric capacity is not available from the expert.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Holding tanks between stages are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1. When there is room, the upstream stage can start the next order's batch; when the tank is full, the upstream stage is blocked and mixing has to wait. Actual tank capacity is not held by the expert; engineering's position is that the line rate is what it is regardless." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it, and engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7111ab55-5d90-44f6-a1d2-4aa1b48da4bb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Holding tanks between stages are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1. When there is room, the upstream stage can start the next order's batch; when the tank is full, the upstream stage is blocked and mixing has to wait. Actual tank capacity is not held by the expert; engineering's position is that the line rate is what it is regardless.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"small holding tank between mill and fill on Line 1\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Qualitative blocking rule stated; the numeric capacity is not available from the expert.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it, and engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "stage-level rates", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Expert named the system where the missing stage-level numbers live.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Stage-by-stage durations/rates (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes, mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1) — feed: the historian." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "nobody's ever broken that down by \"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c858f8bf-b62f-41ac-8b6c-bf1ca8c5d44a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Stage-by-stage durations/rates (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes, mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1) — feed: the historian.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"stage-level rates\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Expert named the system where the missing stage-level numbers live.\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"nobody's ever broken that down by \\\\\\\"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\\\\\\\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "tank sizes", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Named source for a value the expert cannot give.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Holding tank capacities between stages — feed: engineering drawings, obtainable but not carried by the expert." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7d24a8e1-6236-41bd-ab99-3a1036c5b993", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Holding tank capacities between stages — feed: engineering drawings, obtainable but not carried by the expert.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"tank sizes\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Named source for a value the expert cannot give.\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The expert wrote the question as they would type it into the tool.", + "assertion": { + "value": "\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1a240192-8179-4339-815e-3775a062e986", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"\\\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The expert wrote the question as they would type it into the tool.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"\\\\\\\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The expert listed what the answer hangs on.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "entity-type:order", + "entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2", + "activity:the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "activity:filler jam", + "activity:tint-to-white washdown", + "policy:who can absorb the slip", + "constraint:Meridian ships on time" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "It hangs on the jam itself — how long is this repair *actually* going to take", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "And then the knock-on: whatever gets bumped off Line 1, does it blow its own due date, and whose order was it — that's the \"who can absorb it\" judgment call again.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-85062afa-e82d-46ce-b609-f7ed16f8b093", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"entity-type:order\",\"entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2\",\"activity:the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"activity:filler jam\",\"activity:tint-to-white washdown\",\"policy:who can absorb the slip\",\"constraint:Meridian ships on time\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The expert listed what the answer hangs on.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"And then the knock-on: whatever gets bumped off Line 1, does it blow its own due date, and whose order was it — that's the \\\\\\\"who can absorb it\\\\\\\" judgment call again.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"It hangs on the jam itself — how long is this repair *actually* going to take\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Hard constraint plus unweighted secondary measures; the expert explicitly denied having a formula.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Meridian on time is non-negotiable (days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad news); underneath that, washdown hours and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much are weighed by judgment — \"I don't have a formula for it.\"" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I don't have a formula for it.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-2c3fa15f-551b-4380-a3b3-8dbc6334a9bb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Meridian on time is non-negotiable (days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad news); underneath that, washdown hours and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much are weighed by judgment — \\\"I don't have a formula for it.\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Hard constraint plus unweighted secondary measures; the expert explicitly denied having a formula.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I don't have a formula for it.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\"" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\"", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-41269bfb-9040-4d54-a113-a94c09f6f2f0", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"\\\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"\\\\\\\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill kit and holding tanks", + "entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2", + "entity-type:order", + "ordering/flow:stage overlap on a line" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "It also probably depends on the product, since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-f7ea7c88-4d40-48e7-84e5-2b12ebc5ea8e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill kit and holding tanks\",\"entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2\",\"entity-type:order\",\"ordering/flow:stage overlap on a line\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"It also probably depends on the product, since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Qualitative: showing where Line 1 loses its time, in a form usable with engineering.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The model showing \"here's where Line 1 loses its time\" — something to take to engineering other than a hunch; no numeric weighting given." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If the model can actually show me \"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\" that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-dcb22f82-5927-447e-a35a-4ff18d16ce26", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The model showing \\\"here's where Line 1 loses its time\\\" — something to take to engineering other than a hunch; no numeric weighting given.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Qualitative: showing where Line 1 loses its time, in a form usable with engineering.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If the model can actually show me \\\\\\\"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\\\\\\\" that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Whites versus tints (family decides run speed by line and washdown direction; for a white the tint stage is a pass-through); and customer identity — distributor, small account, or an awkward account that gets prickly." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the bumped order's identity matters, not just \"an order got delayed.\"", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0e8d50b2-4222-4129-a619-09c5612c05c5", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Whites versus tints (family decides run speed by line and washdown direction; for a white the tint stage is a pass-through); and customer identity — distributor, small account, or an awkward account that gets prickly.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the bumped order's identity matters, not just \\\\\\\"an order got delayed.\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Quantity, due date, SKU; family (white/tint); customer; remaining quantity and how far through the run it is." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-117f9832-aaba-473a-9411-6fd4022388f2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU; family (white/tint); customer; remaining quantity and how far through the run it is.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The expert described orders arriving as line items in the demand book but gave no counts or arrival volumes.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user", + "pointer": "demand book / ERP" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\",\"pointer\":\"demand book / ERP\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The expert described orders arriving as line items in the demand book but gave no counts or arrival volumes.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "Line 1 and Line 2", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Two lines: Line 2 is the faster machine on whites (roughly twice as fast, \"really a whites number\"); Line 1 is the slower machine, add fifty to sixty percent on a white. On tints the two run at nearly the same speed." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "That's the \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-875ed21b-d257-48fe-867b-6785abf6abb7", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Two lines: Line 2 is the faster machine on whites (roughly twice as fast, \\\"really a whites number\\\"); Line 1 is the slower machine, add fifty to sixty percent on a white. On tints the two run at nearly the same speed.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"Line 1 and Line 2\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That's the \\\\\\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\\\\\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "Line 1 and Line 2", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "What order is on it, how far through that order is, and what family (tint or white) it is currently running — the last decides washdown cost and direction." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-06d48b41-86fb-48c0-b3e0-59012ba81960", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"What order is on it, how far through that order is, and what family (tint or white) it is currently running — the last decides washdown cost and direction.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"Line 1 and Line 2\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "Line 1 and Line 2", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "number", + "rationale": "The expert speaks only of Line 1 and Line 2 throughout.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Two lines — Line 1 and Line 2." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-428e3931-676d-4af5-a30c-d7a31ea0d8ad", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Two lines — Line 1 and Line 2.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"Line 1 and Line 2\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"The expert speaks only of Line 1 and Line 2 throughout.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On the sheet, \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" is one row\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "mix, mill, tint, fill kit and holding tanks", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Mix, mill, tint and fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together, with small holding tanks between them." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ecd3c093-8f6b-4a48-a1fc-d2775d4dbc1f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Mix, mill, tint and fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together, with small holding tanks between them.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"mix, mill, tint, fill kit and holding tanks\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "mix, mill, tint, fill kit and holding tanks", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Qualitative \"small\" only; sizes deferred to engineering drawings.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "engineering drawings" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c6339dee-036e-47cb-9dcf-42fc22d38aae", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"engineering drawings\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"mix, mill, tint, fill kit and holding tanks\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Qualitative \\\"small\\\" only; sizes deferred to engineering drawings.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "holding tank capacity between stages", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Blocking consequence stated; frequency and size not tracked.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A stage can only get a head start if there's room in the holding tank ahead of it; when a tank's full, mixing has to wait. How often that blocking happens is not tracked by the expert." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-2bc071c4-2919-4ff3-910a-92d872eeaef2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A stage can only get a head start if there's room in the holding tank ahead of it; when a tank's full, mixing has to wait. How often that blocking happens is not tracked by the expert.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"holding tank capacity between stages\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Blocking consequence stated; frequency and size not tracked.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "order lifecycle: allocate, run, QA hold, release and ship", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6ec49aac-c165-4e2b-a937-bed3c8c51c2c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"order lifecycle: allocate, run, QA hold, release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "order lifecycle: allocate, run, QA hold, release and ship", + "slot": "how a branch or merge is decided", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The line choice is made by the scheduler at allocation and can be revisited on disruption.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The scheduler slots the order onto a line on the sheet at allocation; on a disruption the choice is re-decided — shift it to the other line or wait out the repair." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c3f03d77-6760-4b3b-99e5-b78d119a352f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The scheduler slots the order onto a line on the sheet at allocation; on a disruption the choice is re-decided — shift it to the other line or wait out the repair.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"order lifecycle: allocate, run, QA hold, release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The line choice is made by the scheduler at allocation and can be revisited on disruption.\",\"slot\":\"how a branch or merge is decided\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "stage overlap on a line", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "prescribed", + "assertion": { + "value": "On the sheet the line is one row: the order occupies the line for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it's done." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \"Line 2\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4cdad6ac-6cd9-46d4-b3ea-62401019ae14", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"On the sheet the line is one row: the order occupies the line for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it's done.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"stage overlap on a line\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"sourceRegime\":\"prescribed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On the sheet, \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "stage overlap on a line", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "The mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill; the crew get a head start on mixing when the tank ahead has space." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it. That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-83e1381a-f2df-4713-a2f6-f11d034c2fd4", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill; the crew get a head start on mixing when the tank ahead has space.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"stage overlap on a line\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it. That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order allocated onto a line and a slot in the week (\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation\")." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-95cbfe20-605f-4218-9076-0f4816ebadfa", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order allocated onto a line and a slot in the week (\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation\\\").\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Filled and packed product coming off the fill line, which then goes into QA hold." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1a5a8343-7367-416e-b760-c7e8f587fe25", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Filled and packed product coming off the fill line, which then goes into QA hold.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "The line (Line 1 or Line 2) — its mix, mill, tint and fill kit — worked by the crew." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-bf2e57a3-bda7-4090-92ca-af63e0c7a248", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The line (Line 1 or Line 2) — its mix, mill, tint and fill kit — worked by the crew.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "rationale": "First account of a white run on Line 2, mix-to-last-pack, including breakdowns folded in loosely.", + "assertion": { + "value": "White, Line 2, normal order size, mix-to-last-pack: typical eight to nine hours; one in ten worse twelve to thirteen hours; one in ten better about six hours. (Expert later said the twelve-thirteen folds in breakdowns.)" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Bad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-aec8ff27-3e3f-45d2-9142-b6dc2b5d88a3", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"White, Line 2, normal order size, mix-to-last-pack: typical eight to nine hours; one in ten worse twelve to thirteen hours; one in ten better about six hours. (Expert later said the twelve-thirteen folds in breakdowns.)\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"rationale\":\"First account of a white run on Line 2, mix-to-last-pack, including breakdowns folded in loosely.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Bad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "rationale": "Supersedes the earlier figure by stripping breakdowns out of the run duration; jams are modelled separately.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Clean run (nothing breaks), white on Line 2: typical eight or nine hours; bad-but-clean one in ten nine to ten hours; one in ten better about six hours. The twelve-thirteen hour bad day is a breakdown showing up inside the run, not the run itself being slow." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup, nothing — a clean run doesn't really vary that much from typical. Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9d59a385-a8ae-410a-a13d-a4bca3dde9a3", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Clean run (nothing breaks), white on Line 2: typical eight or nine hours; bad-but-clean one in ten nine to ten hours; one in ten better about six hours. The twelve-thirteen hour bad day is a breakdown showing up inside the run, not the run itself being slow.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"rationale\":\"Supersedes the earlier figure by stripping breakdowns out of the run duration; jams are modelled separately.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup, nothing — a clean run doesn't really vary that much from typical. Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "rationale": "Same white order on Line 1.", + "assertion": { + "value": "White on Line 1: typical thirteen to fourteen hours; worse days pushing eighteen-plus; best day maybe ten — roughly fifty to sixty percent more than Line 2." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4b22a066-a97c-4329-8513-cbd85edd8d65", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"White on Line 1: typical thirteen to fourteen hours; worse days pushing eighteen-plus; best day maybe ten — roughly fifty to sixty percent more than Line 2.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"rationale\":\"Same white order on Line 1.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "rationale": "Only a typical range was given for tints; no one-in-ten figures.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Tint run on either line: eight to ten hours typical; no big gap between the lines. One-in-ten worse/better not given." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-63fabb67-24c4-4bee-926f-17917300c8f4", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Tint run on either line: eight to ten hours typical; no big gap between the lines. One-in-ten worse/better not given.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Only a typical range was given for tints; no one-in-ten figures.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes — run time varies by family and by line: whites are about twice as fast on Line 2 as Line 1, tints run at nearly the same speed on both; and different SKUs are slow at different stages." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "That's the \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b1e5ded4-79d6-4ff4-bd0d-6386509efba9", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes — run time varies by family and by line: whites are about twice as fast on Line 2 as Line 1, tints run at nearly the same speed on both; and different SKUs are slow at different stages.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That's the \\\\\\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\\\\\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "It stops the run on the line — \"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\" — forcing the wait-or-shift decision." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-147c2765-6bfb-4da0-9df9-b74a1c1049de", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"It stops the run on the line — \\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\\\" — forcing the wait-or-shift decision.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step", + "precision": "range", + "rationale": "Line 2 filler, jams bad enough to stop the run.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Every week or two; low end once every three weeks, high end twice a week when temperamental. Not seasonal, but runs streaks of bad weeks." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "It's a \"every week or two\" thing — low end maybe once every three weeks if we're lucky, high end twice a week if it's being temperamental. It's not seasonal or anything I can point to, it just runs a streak of bad weeks sometimes.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ec5740e7-5068-4222-ad24-8396f5975657", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Every week or two; low end once every three weeks, high end twice a week when temperamental. Not seasonal, but runs streaks of bad weeks.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Line 2 filler, jams bad enough to stop the run.\",\"slot\":\"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"It's a \\\\\\\"every week or two\\\\\\\" thing — low end maybe once every three weeks if we're lucky, high end twice a week if it's being temperamental. It's not seasonal or anything I can point to, it just runs a streak of bad weeks sometimes.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "assertion": { + "value": "Typical repair thirty to forty-five minutes; one-in-ten quick ten to fifteen minutes (a false alarm); one-in-ten bad four to five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift, when something's actually broken in the filler head." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "typical repair is call it thirty to forty-five minutes — tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Quick one-in-ten is more like ten, fifteen minutes, basically a false alarm.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "that's when it's not just a jam but something's actually broken in the filler head, and that can run four, five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-2884cc84-c616-4227-860a-d6b55a06c13d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Typical repair thirty to forty-five minutes; one-in-ten quick ten to fifteen minutes (a false alarm); one-in-ten bad four to five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift, when something's actually broken in the filler head.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Quick one-in-ten is more like ten, fifteen minutes, basically a false alarm.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's when it's not just a jam but something's actually broken in the filler head, and that can run four, five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"typical repair is call it thirty to forty-five minutes — tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Repair is done by a tech.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A tech — comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0548a680-8da8-47e9-ad72-fb1e264fac80", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A tech — comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Repair is done by a tech.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "At the time of the decision the repair length is unobservable to the scheduler.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Repair duration is not known at the time of the decision — \"which I never know at the time\"; only \"could be quick, could be long\"." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "how long is this repair *actually* going to take, which I never know at the time", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-8c6a716b-e09a-4977-94d9-f28ab74be7c4", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Repair duration is not known at the time of the decision — \\\"which I never know at the time\\\"; only \\\"could be quick, could be long\\\".\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"At the time of the decision the repair length is unobservable to the scheduler.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"how long is this repair *actually* going to take, which I never know at the time\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "number", + "rationale": "Single figure given; no spread elicited.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours for a tint-to-white washdown." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a67683fd-0f34-4838-b48e-aa01f657a511", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours for a tint-to-white washdown.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Single figure given; no spread elicited.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "A changeover of family on the line; the direction matters as much as the fact of it — tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1b632a29-f1de-48e5-8f96-a5ef908c4a56", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A changeover of family on the line; the direction matters as much as the fact of it — tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Hours and crew time are known; ramp scrap is named but unquantified.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user", + "pointer": "ramp scrap after the washdown — \"which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored\"; three hours of line and crew time are known" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9926552e-289f-4b4a-bc99-4cae34f1720a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\",\"pointer\":\"ramp scrap after the washdown — \\\"which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored\\\"; three hours of line and crew time are known\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Hours and crew time are known; ramp scrap is named but unquantified.\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "The crew, on the line being changed over (Line 1 in the incident described)." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-06aac0a9-b270-4b13-a54f-37440769d685", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The crew, on the line being changed over (Line 1 in the incident described).\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "rationale": "\"a few hours for a white\" — no quantiles given, and the specialty wait is named but unquantified.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Usually a few hours for a white; \"nothing like the specialty wait\" — specialty duration not given." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-94948329-18e7-42fe-9538-a84fd72c225d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Usually a few hours for a white; \\\"nothing like the specialty wait\\\" — specialty duration not given.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"\\\"a few hours for a white\\\" — no quantiles given, and the specialty wait is named but unquantified.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "The lab." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-16b9c643-8b17-490e-bfe0-022a06efd914", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The lab.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-5ae45290-5d13-4f2b-b24b-82c66d3d48af", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Judgment on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I use judgment on who can absorb the slip", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-821e00ef-6923-43b0-955b-3ed7d60ce127", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Judgment on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I use judgment on who can absorb the slip\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The hard on-time line for an order like Meridian overrides the weighing — it is not a trade-off, and is only crossed if there's truly no way through." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6da3fa16-460b-4f07-aefc-f941d7118f76", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The hard on-time line for an order like Meridian overrides the weighing — it is not a trade-off, and is only crossed if there's truly no way through.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "Meridian ships on time", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Meridian ships on time, full stop; days late above zero is bad news the scheduler has to go explain. Only crossed \"unless there's truly no way through\"." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-731a5768-edc7-4858-ad42-50d2faf4b181", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Meridian ships on time, full stop; days late above zero is bad news the scheduler has to go explain. Only crossed \\\"unless there's truly no way through\\\".\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"Meridian ships on time\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "boundary-condition", + "node": "demand book from ERP", + "slot": "the starting state", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Orders start life as line items in the demand book once ERP spits it out, carrying quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Orders start life as line items in the demand book once ERP spits it out, carrying quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"boundary-condition\",\"node\":\"demand book from ERP\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the starting state\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "boundary-condition", + "node": "demand book from ERP", + "slot": "the arrival or availability pattern", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The expert named the demand book as the source but the arrival pattern was flagged as still open when the session ended.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "how orders arrive into the demand book — named as still open at the close of the session" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-07cb7ca9-27c5-4395-bc9e-aaebc5811382", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"how orders arrive into the demand book — named as still open at the close of the session\"},\"kind\":\"boundary-condition\",\"node\":\"demand book from ERP\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The expert named the demand book as the source but the arrival pattern was flagged as still open when the session ended.\",\"slot\":\"the arrival or availability pattern\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "stage-level times in the historian", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — feed: the historian; never pulled apart by the expert." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "nobody's ever broken that down by \"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-882fa9a2-3a16-46df-90b7-d5ab8ee1dce2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — feed: the historian; never pulled apart by the expert.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"stage-level times in the historian\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"nobody's ever broken that down by \\\\\\\"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\\\\\\\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "tank sizes from engineering drawings", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "Holding tank sizes, especially mill-to-fill on Line 1 — feed: engineering drawings." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b6c2c920-801d-4858-b2c7-64c13ebfc5b1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Holding tank sizes, especially mill-to-fill on Line 1 — feed: engineering drawings.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"tank sizes from engineering drawings\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "filler repair work-order times in the CMMS", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "Actual filler repair durations — feed: maintenance work-order times in the CMMS; never pulled by the expert." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "maintenance would have the actual work-order times in the CMMS but I've never pulled them", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a0429a34-1145-458d-bada-32d827d68959", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Actual filler repair durations — feed: maintenance work-order times in the CMMS; never pulled by the expert.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"filler repair work-order times in the CMMS\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"maintenance would have the actual work-order times in the CMMS but I've never pulled them\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "wait or shift when Line 2 goes down", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The expert wrote the question as he would type it into the tool.", + "assertion": { + "value": "\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-48033ee8-f7eb-4615-b21f-018837fc9c5e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"\\\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"wait or shift when Line 2 goes down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The expert wrote the question as he would type it into the tool.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"\\\\\\\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "wait or shift when Line 2 goes down", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "entity-type:order (demand book line item) — its due date and remaining quantity; entity-type:line (Line 1 / Line 2) — what is on Line 1 and how far through; entity-type:product family (white vs tint); activity:production run (mix, mill, tint, fill); activity:filler jam on Line 2 — repair length unknown at the time; activity:tint-to-white washdown — including its direction and ramp scrap; policy:who can absorb the slip — whose tint got bumped" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "What it hangs on: the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way). It hangs on the jam itself — how long is this repair *actually* going to take", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it, and the bumped order's identity matters, not just \"an order got delayed.\"", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-88da9925-d922-48c3-8ea0-2c631df3ae3d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"entity-type:order (demand book line item) — its due date and remaining quantity; entity-type:line (Line 1 / Line 2) — what is on Line 1 and how far through; entity-type:product family (white vs tint); activity:production run (mix, mill, tint, fill); activity:filler jam on Line 2 — repair length unknown at the time; activity:tint-to-white washdown — including its direction and ramp scrap; policy:who can absorb the slip — whose tint got bumped\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"wait or shift when Line 2 goes down\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"What it hangs on: the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way). It hangs on the jam itself — how long is this repair *actually* going to take\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it, and the bumped order's identity matters, not just \\\\\\\"an order got delayed.\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "wait or shift when Line 2 goes down", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Lexicographic: days late on Meridian first, anything above zero is bad; below that, weigh washdown hours against whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and who the customer is. No formula — judgment on who can absorb the slip." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \"cross the line\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \"how bad is bad\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-f53d8f62-375e-4af6-9aaa-fb903839993c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Lexicographic: days late on Meridian first, anything above zero is bad; below that, weigh washdown hours against whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and who the customer is. No formula — judgment on who can absorb the slip.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"wait or shift when Line 2 goes down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \\\\\\\"cross the line\\\\\\\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \\\\\\\"how bad is bad\\\\\\\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "activity:production run (mix, mill, tint, fill) — stage-level mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1; constraint:small holding tanks between stages — the mill-to-fill tank size on Line 1; entity-type:product family (white vs tint) — different SKUs are slow at different stages" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have. It also probably depends on the product, since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ac435640-eea2-4ad6-9695-8e5408b4d852", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"activity:production run (mix, mill, tint, fill) — stage-level mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1; constraint:small holding tanks between stages — the mill-to-fill tank size on Line 1; entity-type:product family (white vs tint) — different SKUs are slow at different stages\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have. It also probably depends on the product, since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "stage-level times from the historian and tank sizes from engineering drawings", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "the historian (stage-by-stage times) and engineering drawings (tank sizes)" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I don't have clean numbers for tank sizes or stage-by-stage rates.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that. Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-f5a658db-c8ec-4ca0-8a87-3ad252dee56d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"the historian (stage-by-stage times) and engineering drawings (tank sizes)\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"stage-level times from the historian and tank sizes from engineering drawings\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I don't have clean numbers for tank sizes or stage-by-stage rates.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that. Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "filler repair times from the CMMS", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "maintenance work-order times in the CMMS" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "maintenance would have the actual work-order times in the CMMS but I've never pulled them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I'll ask maintenance for the CMMS numbers on the filler too while I'm at it.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 30, + "entryEnd": 30 + }, + "source": "user" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-618842bb-d23d-4371-ae57-73e5257ba215", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"maintenance work-order times in the CMMS\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"filler repair times from the CMMS\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'll ask maintenance for the CMMS numbers on the filler too while I'm at it.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":30,\\\"entryStart\\\":30,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"maintenance would have the actual work-order times in the CMMS but I've never pulled them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "boundary-condition", + "node": "demand book line items out of ERP", + "slot": "the starting state", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "An order starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out, carrying quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-538fb022-2495-46bb-8661-8e1f38c802bf", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"An order starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out, carrying quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"boundary-condition\",\"node\":\"demand book line items out of ERP\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the starting state\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order (demand book line item)", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Quantity, due date and SKU are explicit; remaining quantity and customer identity are named later as things the answer hangs on.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Quantity, due date, SKU; plus remaining quantity and the customer's identity, which the expert weighs when an order slips." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-ec8c16b7-d4c0-46fa-a64d-63a23fa37b98", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU; plus remaining quantity and the customer's identity, which the expert weighs when an order slips.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order (demand book line item)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Quantity, due date and SKU are explicit; remaining quantity and customer identity are named later as things the answer hangs on.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order (demand book line item)", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Orders are treated apart by whose order it is: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-5d5f862f-c18c-4501-b544-76735d28e004", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Orders are treated apart by whose order it is: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order (demand book line item)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "product family (white vs tint)", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Whites versus tints: for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step; tints run at nearly the same speed on both lines while whites do not; and the tint-to-white changeover direction is the expensive one." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7f6b8be1-6336-465f-8e11-36a5277d51bd", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Whites versus tints: for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step; tints run at nearly the same speed on both lines while whites do not; and the tint-to-white changeover direction is the expensive one.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"product family (white vs tint)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line (Line 1 / Line 2)", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Line 1 is the slower machine on whites (add maybe fifty, sixty percent to Line 2's times); on tints Line 1 and Line 2 run at nearly the same speed." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1a83c9c6-a8f8-4ece-a5d4-53b81bf8cc9b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Line 1 is the slower machine on whites (add maybe fifty, sixty percent to Line 2's times); on tints Line 1 and Line 2 run at nearly the same speed.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line (Line 1 / Line 2)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line (Line 1 / Line 2)", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "number", + "rationale": "Only Line 1 and Line 2 are ever named; the count itself was never stated as a figure.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Two lines (Line 1 and Line 2), each comprising separate mix, mill, tint and fill kit with small holding tanks between." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-e6ae51ed-e1f6-45f3-aab1-c4bca2a979e8", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Two lines (Line 1 and Line 2), each comprising separate mix, mill, tint and fill kit with small holding tanks between.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line (Line 1 / Line 2)\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Only Line 1 and Line 2 are ever named; the count itself was never stated as a figure.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "order flow from demand book to ship", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c2d2a972-d139-43a7-80c2-50108d92f7a7", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"order flow from demand book to ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "line occupancy across the four stages", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "prescribed", + "assertion": { + "value": "On the sheet, Line 2 is one row: the order occupies Line 2 for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it is done." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \"Line 2\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6c277c9b-2362-4158-8a3b-e069ff0c9a01", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"On the sheet, Line 2 is one row: the order occupies Line 2 for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it is done.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"line occupancy across the four stages\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"sourceRegime\":\"prescribed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On the sheet, \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "line occupancy across the four stages", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Physically the stages overlap: the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there is room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill; the crew will get a head start on mixing if the tank ahead has space." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it. That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7f9ac97e-375b-4de3-bbcd-b65e5c7427a6", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Physically the stages overlap: the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there is room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill; the crew will get a head start on mixing if the tank ahead has space.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"line occupancy across the four stages\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it. That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "small holding tanks between stages", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and when a tank is full, mixing has to wait; how much overlap happens or how often it is blocked is not tracked." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-66fbb371-91b7-41db-b437-5bd207d08aed", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and when a tank is full, mixing has to wait; how much overlap happens or how often it is blocked is not tracked.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"small holding tanks between stages\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation onto a line and a slot in the week", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "The master scheduler, on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-8da19d62-c082-41f6-ac55-f28afe266a8c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The master scheduler, on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation onto a line and a slot in the week\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation onto a line and a slot in the week", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line item in the demand book out of ERP, with quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU. I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-995374a1-2d25-4690-8397-b342f46ebf02", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line item in the demand book out of ERP, with quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation onto a line and a slot in the week\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU. I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation onto a line and a slot in the week", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is placed onto a named line and a slot in the week." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3cc84392-4ed4-4804-8a7c-db07d384a8b2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is placed onto a named line and a slot in the week.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation onto a line and a slot in the week\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order allocated to a line and a slot in the week; then it runs the same four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Then it actually has to get produced — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-289ac648-e939-4e62-ad46-a17b112402d4", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order allocated to a line and a slot in the week; then it runs the same four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it actually has to get produced — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Packed product coming off the fill line, which then goes into QA hold." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-5376c084-3889-476f-adab-b09a038ded28", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Packed product coming off the fill line, which then goes into QA hold.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "White, Meridian-sized, on Line 2, clean of breakdowns: typical eight to nine hours mix-to-last-pack; one in ten worse nine to ten hours; one in ten better maybe six hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b9dfddf9-52d8-433e-81b8-5611e7356c34", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"White, Meridian-sized, on Line 2, clean of breakdowns: typical eight to nine hours mix-to-last-pack; one in ten worse nine to ten hours; one in ten better maybe six hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "assertion": { + "value": "Same white order on Line 1: typical thirteen to fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten — add maybe fifty, sixty percent to Line 2. (Stated before the breakdown/clean-run split was drawn, so the worse figure may still fold in jams.)" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-27ae8fdf-c227-4160-a1a5-e85530156938", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Same white order on Line 1: typical thirteen to fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten — add maybe fifty, sixty percent to Line 2. (Stated before the breakdown/clean-run split was drawn, so the worse figure may still fold in jams.)\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "assertion": { + "value": "A tint run on either line: eight to ten hours typical, without the Line 1 / Line 2 gap." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7bd393bf-3f05-4aa1-b15a-968c293b076f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A tint run on either line: eight to ten hours typical, without the Line 1 / Line 2 gap.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes — run time varies by product family and line: whites are much slower on Line 1, tints are nearly the same speed on either line; the \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" figure is really a whites number. No explanation for the tint case; it is sheet-derived." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap. I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "That's the \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ef41e72f-3126-4003-82b2-686b5f8bfdfb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes — run time varies by product family and line: whites are much slower on Line 1, tints are nearly the same speed on either line; the \\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\" figure is really a whites number. No explanation for the tint case; it is sheet-derived.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That's the \\\\\\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\\\\\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap. I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam on Line 2", + "slot": "how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Every week or two; low end once every three weeks, high end twice a week. Not seasonal, but runs streaks of bad weeks." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "It's a \"every week or two\" thing — low end maybe once every three weeks if we're lucky, high end twice a week if it's being temperamental. It's not seasonal or anything I can point to, it just runs a streak of bad weeks sometimes.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4fa34ba3-82e3-4a4a-ad28-362765a40046", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Every week or two; low end once every three weeks, high end twice a week. Not seasonal, but runs streaks of bad weeks.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam on Line 2\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"slot\":\"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"It's a \\\\\\\"every week or two\\\\\\\" thing — low end maybe once every three weeks if we're lucky, high end twice a week if it's being temperamental. It's not seasonal or anything I can point to, it just runs a streak of bad weeks sometimes.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam on Line 2", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Repair: typical thirty to forty-five minutes; quick one-in-ten ten to fifteen minutes (basically a false alarm); bad one-in-ten four to five hours when something is actually broken in the filler head, occasionally eating the rest of the shift." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "typical repair is call it thirty to forty-five minutes — tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again. Quick one-in-ten is more like ten, fifteen minutes, basically a false alarm. The bad one-in-ten is the one that scares me — that's when it's not just a jam but something's actually broken in the filler head, and that can run four, five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-2f670377-be1e-4275-9e46-24dd13316300", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Repair: typical thirty to forty-five minutes; quick one-in-ten ten to fifteen minutes (basically a false alarm); bad one-in-ten four to five hours when something is actually broken in the filler head, occasionally eating the rest of the shift.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam on Line 2\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"typical repair is call it thirty to forty-five minutes — tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again. Quick one-in-ten is more like ten, fifteen minutes, basically a false alarm. The bad one-in-ten is the one that scares me — that's when it's not just a jam but something's actually broken in the filler head, and that can run four, five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam on Line 2", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "A tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed and resets." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9dc62989-7db7-4e58-baf1-b9ed0400d9a2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed and resets.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam on Line 2\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam on Line 2", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The run stops and time is lost inside the run — the big bad days (twelve to thirteen hours) are the breakdown showing up inside the run rather than the run being slow." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b92eccd9-e2ad-41a9-abce-bb1cf8b3c328", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The run stops and time is lost inside the run — the big bad days (twelve to thirteen hours) are the breakdown showing up inside the run rather than the run being slow.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam on Line 2\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "number", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-55e95600-febe-4c98-8859-a56eb23ab156", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "precision": "number", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours of crew time with Line 1 out of anything else for that window; direction matters — tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-29c03a62-4be2-4dc2-852e-bfeab6770f1b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours of crew time with Line 1 out of anything else for that window; direction matters — tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user", + "pointer": "ramp scrap after the washdown — real product lost on top of the hours; no good numbers and no source named" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9f708103-e43a-4766-bca4-cb3b7060fdcd", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\",\"pointer\":\"ramp scrap after the washdown — real product lost on top of the hours; no good numbers and no source named\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "release and ship", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-fdecb081-5b4a-4c7b-b11d-e0d780df210c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "Usually a few hours for a white; nothing like the specialty wait (the specialty wait itself was never quantified)." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c9379f74-4d1e-41c6-b1bf-a53c9d8fb64d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Usually a few hours for a white; nothing like the specialty wait (the specialty wait itself was never quantified).\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "The lab — it sits in the lab's queue and gets checked." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-12e575e7-b7a9-472d-b165-308334ae7513", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The lab — it sits in the lab's queue and gets checked.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Gut math at the huddle: weigh the gamble that the repair is the \"half hour\" kind against the tint-to-white washdown plus the bumped tint order going late. In the Meridian case he went with waiting; it came back in about two hours and just scraped the Thursday due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date. But I was sweating it, and honestly I couldn't tell you if that was the right call or I just got lucky.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-bc9d210e-beb9-4f7a-aa5d-243950605a2a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Gut math at the huddle: weigh the gamble that the repair is the \\\"half hour\\\" kind against the tint-to-white washdown plus the bumped tint order going late. In the Meridian case he went with waiting; it came back in about two hours and just scraped the Thursday due date.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date. But I was sweating it, and honestly I couldn't tell you if that was the right call or I just got lucky.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The Meridian-style on-time due date overrides the weighing — a line he won't cross unless there's truly no way through." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-90a38599-7f1b-46ed-9352-d3dd3566b338", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The Meridian-style on-time due date overrides the weighing — a line he won't cross unless there's truly no way through.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Judgment, not a formula: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I don't have a formula for it. It's more \"how bad is bad\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d889a88e-b7be-4055-9da1-e64f9fc858b0", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Judgment, not a formula: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I don't have a formula for it. It's more \\\\\\\"how bad is bad\\\\\\\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "Meridian-style due date is a line I won't cross", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "The protected order must ship on time; days late above zero is bad news the scheduler has to go explain. The line is crossed only if there's truly no way through." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-173c6d39-090f-49a7-9e38-c8998003718b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The protected order must ship on time; days late above zero is bad news the scheduler has to go explain. The line is crossed only if there's truly no way through.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"Meridian-style due date is a line I won't cross\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + } + ], + "issues": [], + "events": [] +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5-model.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5-model.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fbc00da3aed --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5-model.md @@ -0,0 +1,444 @@ +# Condition 5 — the elicited model, folded from the capture store + +The harness's own deliverable: `foldElicitedModel` over the active captures, then +`evaluateCompletion` against the sdcpn definition. Nothing here was written by the +interviewer; every value is a capture the sweep extracted and the store admitted. + +- Plugin version: `sdcpn/2026-08-25.2` +- Revision: `26a8219a17118558` +- Active captures: 267 +- Complete: **no** — 46 unsatisfied, 53 node(s) outside every objective's slice, 0 unmapped capture(s) + +## Nodes + +### entity-type (12) + +#### `entity-type:line` +- **how many there are, or the population's shape** — conflict — 2 readings +- **state that rides along with each instance** — "What it is currently running — e.g. mid-run on a tint, which sets the colour it would have to be washed down from — and whether it is jammed/down awaiting repair." — spelled out, inferred, practiced — _A line is spoken of as carrying what it is currently running (its colour state) and whether it is down._ +- **the distinctions the process treats apart** — conflict — 2 readings + +#### `entity-type:line (Line 1 / Line 2)` +- **how many there are, or the population's shape** — conflict — 2 readings +- **the distinctions the process treats apart** — conflict — 3 readings + +#### `entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2` +- **how many there are, or the population's shape** — "Two lines — Line 1 and Line 2." — number, explicit — _The expert speaks only of Line 1 and Line 2 throughout._ +- **state that rides along with each instance** — "What order is on it, how far through that order is, and what family (tint or white) it is currently running — the last decides washdown cost and direction." — spelled out, explicit +- **the distinctions the process treats apart** — conflict — 3 readings + +#### `entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill` +- **how many there are, or the population's shape** — absence: unknown-to-user → how much overlap happens and how often mixing is blocked by a full tank is not tracked by the scheduler (explicit) +- **the distinctions the process treats apart** — divergence — prescribed {"value":"On the sheet the line is one row treated as one thing: the order occupies it for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it is done."}; practiced {"value":"Physically four separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last, if there is room in the holding tank — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space."} + +#### `entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill kit and holding tanks` +- **how many there are, or the population's shape** — absence: deferred → engineering drawings (explicit) +- **the distinctions the process treats apart** — "Mix, mill, tint and fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together, with small holding tanks between them." — spelled out, explicit, practiced + +#### `entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill stages` +- **how many there are, or the population's shape** — absence: deferred → engineering drawings (tank sizes) — expert does not carry them in his head (explicit) +- **the distinctions the process treats apart** — "Mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, has room." — spelled out, explicit, practiced — _The floor's account: four separately contended pieces of kit per line, buffered by small holding tanks._ + +#### `entity-type:order` +- **how many there are, or the population's shape** — absence: unknown-to-user → demand book / ERP (inferred) +- **state that rides along with each instance** — conflict — 6 readings +- **the distinctions the process treats apart** — conflict — 6 readings + +#### `entity-type:order (demand book line item)` +- **state that rides along with each instance** — "Quantity, due date, SKU; plus remaining quantity and the customer's identity, which the expert weighs when an order slips." — spelled out, inferred — _Quantity, due date and SKU are explicit; remaining quantity and customer identity are named later as things the answer hangs on._ +- **the distinctions the process treats apart** — "Orders are treated apart by whose order it is: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem." — spelled out, explicit, practiced + +#### `entity-type:order (line item in the demand book)` +- **state that rides along with each instance** — "Quantity, due date, SKU; the customer (distributor / small account / awkward account); which line and week-slot it has been allocated to; whether it has gone late and by how many days." — spelled out, explicit — _Quantity, due date, SKU come from ERP; customer type is used in the slip judgement; line allocation is set at step one._ +- **the distinctions the process treats apart** — "Orders are line items with quantity, due date and SKU. Treated apart: whites (tint stage barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step) vs tints (real letdown); and by customer — a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem." — spelled out, explicit — _Whites vs tints differ in the tint stage and in run time by line; customer identity differs in slip tolerance._ + +#### `entity-type:product family (white vs tint)` +- **the distinctions the process treats apart** — "Whites versus tints: for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step; tints run at nearly the same speed on both lines while whites do not; and the tint-to-white changeover direction is the expensive one." — spelled out, explicit + +#### `entity-type:stage kit (mix, mill, tint, fill)` +- **the distinctions the process treats apart** — "Four separate pieces of kit per line — mixer, mill, tint, fill head — each usable independently, with small holding tanks buffering between mix/mill and mill/fill." — spelled out, explicit, practiced — _Each stage is separately contended kit._ + +#### `entity-type:the four stages — mix, mill, tint, fill` +- **how many there are, or the population's shape** — "Four stages in series per line — mix, mill, tint, fill — with small holding tanks between them; how often blocking occurs is not tracked." — named, explicit — _Count of stages is stated; occupancy/blocking frequency is explicitly untracked._ +- **the distinctions the process treats apart** — "Physically mix, mill, tint and fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head finishes the last one if the tank ahead has space." — spelled out, explicit, practiced — _The floor's version of the line: four contended stages with buffers, not one resource._ + +### boundary-condition (2) + +#### `boundary-condition:demand book from ERP` +- **the arrival or availability pattern** — conflict — 2 readings +- **the starting state** — conflict — 3 readings + +#### `boundary-condition:demand book line items out of ERP` +- **the starting state** — "An order starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out, carrying quantity, due date and SKU." — spelled out, explicit + +### activity (15) + +#### `activity:allocation` +- **what it needs before it can start** — conflict — 5 readings +- **what it produces or changes** — conflict — 5 readings +- **who or what performs it** — conflict — 3 readings + +#### `activity:allocation onto a line and a slot in the week` +- **what it needs before it can start** — "A line item in the demand book out of ERP, with quantity, due date and SKU." — spelled out, explicit +- **what it produces or changes** — "The order is placed onto a named line and a slot in the week." — spelled out, explicit +- **who or what performs it** — "The master scheduler, on the sheet." — named, explicit + +#### `activity:filler jam` +- **how long it takes** — conflict — 5 readings +- **how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step** — conflict — 3 readings +- **what it needs before it can start** — "Repair duration is not known at the time of the decision — \"which I never know at the time\"; only \"could be quick, could be long\"." — spelled out, explicit — _At the time of the decision the repair length is unobservable to the scheduler._ +- **what it produces or changes** — conflict — 5 readings +- **who or what performs it** — "A tech — comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets." — named, explicit — _Repair is done by a tech._ + +#### `activity:filler jam on Line 2` +- **how long it takes** — "Repair: typical thirty to forty-five minutes; quick one-in-ten ten to fifteen minutes (basically a false alarm); bad one-in-ten four to five hours when something is actually broken in the filler head, occasionally eating the rest of the shift." — spread, explicit, practiced +- **how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step** — "Every week or two; low end once every three weeks, high end twice a week. Not seasonal, but runs streaks of bad weeks." — range, explicit, practiced +- **what it produces or changes** — "The run stops and time is lost inside the run — the big bad days (twelve to thirteen hours) are the breakdown showing up inside the run rather than the run being slow." — spelled out, explicit +- **who or what performs it** — "A tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed and resets." — named, explicit + +#### `activity:filler jammed` +- **how long it takes** — "Two kinds of repair: the \"half hour\" kind and the \"half a shift\" kind. The most recent Line 2 filler jam came back in about two hours." — range, explicit, practiced — _Two recognised repair kinds bracket the duration; the recent instance fell between them._ +- **what it produces or changes** — "The line's filler stops mid-run with an unknown ETA, putting the order on it at risk and forcing a decision to wait out the repair or move the order to the other line." — spelled out, explicit — _An event that befalls the line mid-run and forces the switch-or-wait decision._ + +#### `activity:Line 2 filler jam` +- **how long it takes** — "Repairs come in a \"half hour\" kind and a \"half a shift\" kind; the recent instance came back in about two hours." — range, explicit, practiced — _Expert described two kinds of repair — half an hour and half a shift — and one observed instance of about two hours; quantiles not yet elicited._ +- **what it produces or changes** — "Line 2 stops producing until repaired (half a shift lost in the recent case); the order sitting on Line 2 is at risk of its due date, forcing a decision to wait out the repair or shift the order to Line 1." — spelled out, explicit, practiced — _The event takes the line out of production and puts the order sitting on it at risk, forcing a wait-or-move decision._ + +#### `activity:mix/mill/tint/fill` +- **what it produces or changes** — "Runs the order through four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack — producing filled and packed product that comes off the fill line." — spelled out, explicit — _Stated as the production step common to all products._ +- **whether its quantities vary by type** — "Yes — the stages are the same for every product, but for a white the tint stage is barely there, a pass-through rather than a real letdown step." — named, explicit — _Explicit type-dependence at the tint stage; stage durations themselves not yet given._ + +#### `activity:production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)` +- **how long it takes** — conflict — 3 readings +- **what it needs before it can start** — "The order allocated to a line and a slot in the week; then it runs the same four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack." — spelled out, explicit +- **what it produces or changes** — "Packed product coming off the fill line, which then goes into QA hold." — spelled out, explicit +- **whether its quantities vary by type** — "Yes — run time varies by product family and line: whites are much slower on Line 1, tints are nearly the same speed on either line; the \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" figure is really a whites number. No explanation for the tint case; it is sheet-derived." — named, explicit + +#### `activity:QA hold` +- **how long it takes** — conflict — 7 readings +- **what it needs before it can start** — "The order has come off the fill line; it then sits in the lab's queue awaiting check." — spelled out, explicit — _Stated as the precondition and the waiting arrangement._ +- **what it produces or changes** — conflict — 3 readings +- **whether its quantities vary by type** — conflict — 2 readings +- **who or what performs it** — conflict — 7 readings + +#### `activity:release and ship` +- **what it produces or changes** — conflict — 4 readings + +#### `activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill` +- **how long it takes** — conflict — 6 readings +- **what it needs before it can start** — conflict — 2 readings +- **what it produces or changes** — conflict — 2 readings +- **whether its quantities vary by type** — conflict — 3 readings +- **who or what performs it** — conflict — 2 readings + +#### `activity:run the batch (mix/mill/tint/fill)` +- **how long it takes** — absence: deferred → the expert's scheduling sheet (roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line) (explicit) +- **what it produces or changes** — "The order is produced through the same four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack — and comes off the fill line." — spelled out, explicit — _The production run through the four stages._ +- **whether its quantities vary by type** — absence: deferred → the historian (stage-by-stage times: how long does mixing take, how long does milling take) (explicit) + +#### `activity:the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)` +- **how long it takes** — conflict — 4 readings +- **what it needs before it can start** — "The order allocated onto a line and a slot in the week (\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation\")." — spelled out, explicit +- **what it produces or changes** — "Filled and packed product coming off the fill line, which then goes into QA hold." — spelled out, explicit +- **whether its quantities vary by type** — "Yes — run time varies by family and by line: whites are about twice as fast on Line 2 as Line 1, tints run at nearly the same speed on both; and different SKUs are slow at different stages." — named, explicit +- **who or what performs it** — "The line (Line 1 or Line 2) — its mix, mill, tint and fill kit — worked by the crew." — named, explicit + +#### `activity:tint stage` +- **whether its quantities vary by type** — "Yes — for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step." — named, explicit — _Explicit variation by product type._ + +#### `activity:tint-to-white washdown` +- **how long it takes** — conflict — 6 readings +- **what is lost when it changes the system's mode** — conflict — 8 readings +- **what it needs before it can start** — conflict — 7 readings +- **what it produces or changes** — conflict — 4 readings +- **who or what performs it** — "The crew, on the line being changed over (Line 1 in the incident described)." — named, explicit + +### ordering/flow (8) + +#### `ordering/flow:allocate → run → QA hold → release and ship` +- **the order things happen in** — conflict — 2 readings + +#### `ordering/flow:line occupancy across the four stages` +- **the order things happen in** — divergence — prescribed {"value":"On the sheet, Line 2 is one row: the order occupies Line 2 for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it is done."}; practiced {"value":"Physically the stages overlap: the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there is room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill; the crew will get a head start on mixing if the tank ahead has space."} + +#### `ordering/flow:order flow from demand book to ship` +- **the order things happen in** — "Allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship against the due date." — spelled out, explicit + +#### `ordering/flow:order flow from demand book to shipment` +- **the order things happen in** — "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill (fill and pack) → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if QA and shipping are counted as one, five if split." — spelled out, explicit — _Given verbatim as the end-to-end sequence for the Meridian white order._ + +#### `ordering/flow:order flow, allocate to ship` +- **the order things happen in** — "Allocate the order onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix / mill / tint / fill and pack → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if QA and shipping count as one, five if split." — spelled out, explicit — _The end-to-end order stated by the expert._ + +#### `ordering/flow:order life on the floor` +- **the order things happen in** — "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship" — spelled out, explicit — _Expert's own summary of the end-to-end sequence._ + +#### `ordering/flow:order lifecycle: allocate, run, QA hold, release and ship` +- **how a branch or merge is decided** — "The scheduler slots the order onto a line on the sheet at allocation; on a disruption the choice is re-decided — shift it to the other line or wait out the repair." — spelled out, explicit — _The line choice is made by the scheduler at allocation and can be revisited on disruption._ +- **the order things happen in** — "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship" — spelled out, explicit + +#### `ordering/flow:stage overlap on a line` +- **how a branch or merge is decided** — absence: unknown-to-user (explicit) +- **the order things happen in** — conflict — 3 readings + +### policy (5) + +#### `policy:a line is occupied for the whole run` +- **the rule as actually practiced** — "On the sheet, a line is one row: the order occupies that line for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it till it's done." — spelled out, explicit, prescribed — _P08: the scheduling sheet's rule, which the expert says lies to him a bit._ +- **what overrides it** — "On the floor the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space — the mixer can start the next order while the fill head finishes the last one. How much overlap happens, and how often it is blocked because a tank is full, is not tracked." — spelled out, explicit, practiced — _P08 divergence: floor practice overlaps stages when buffer space allows._ + +#### `policy:Meridian on time` +- **the rule as actually practiced** — "A Meridian-style order ships on time, full stop; it is not traded off against anything." — spelled out, explicit, practiced — _Hard constraint on the scheduling decision._ +- **what overrides it** — "Only when there is truly no way through." — spelled out, explicit, practiced — _Only exception stated._ + +#### `policy:Meridian ships on time, full stop` +- **the rule as actually practiced** — "The Meridian order ships on time, full stop; it is not traded off against washdown hours or other orders' due dates." — spelled out, explicit, practiced — _Stated as an absolute the scheduler protects ahead of all other considerations._ +- **what overrides it** — "Only when there is truly no way through; otherwise nothing overrides it." — spelled out, explicit, practiced — _Expert named the sole override in general terms; the practiced test for "no way through" is not yet on record._ + +#### `policy:wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1` +- **the rule as actually practiced** — "Gut math at the huddle: weigh the gamble that the repair is the \"half hour\" kind against the tint-to-white washdown plus the bumped tint order going late. In the Meridian case he went with waiting; it came back in about two hours and just scraped the Thursday due date." — spelled out, explicit, practiced +- **what overrides it** — "The Meridian-style on-time due date overrides the weighing — a line he won't cross unless there's truly no way through." — spelled out, explicit + +#### `policy:who can absorb the slip` +- **the rule as actually practiced** — conflict — 7 readings +- **what overrides it** — conflict — 4 readings + +### objective (7) + +#### `objective:is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down` +- **the nodes it depends on** — conflict — 3 readings +- **the question, in the expert's words** — "\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\"" — spelled out, explicit — _Second question the expert wrote out as he would type it._ +- **what "better" means, and trade-off weights** — "The model showing \"here's where Line 1 loses its time\" — something to take to engineering other than a hunch; no numeric weighting given." — spelled out, explicit — _Qualitative: showing where Line 1 loses its time, in a form usable with engineering._ + +#### `objective:switch or wait when Line 2 goes down` +- **the nodes it depends on** — ["entity-type:order","entity-type:line","activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill","activity:tint-to-white washdown","activity:filler jam","policy:who can absorb the slip"] — named, explicit — _The expert listed what the answer hangs on: the protected run and its due date, the state of Line 1, the changeover and its direction, the jam duration, and whose order gets bumped._ +- **the question, in the expert's words** — "\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"" — spelled out, explicit — _The expert wrote the question as he would type it into the tool._ +- **what "better" means, and trade-off weights** — "Hard line: days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad news. Underneath that, weighed by judgment with no formula: washdown hours, and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and for which customer." — spelled out, explicit, practiced — _Expert gave a lexicographic hard constraint plus unweighted second-order criteria, explicitly denying a formula._ + +#### `objective:switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run` +- **the nodes it depends on** — ["entity-type:order","entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2","activity:the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)","activity:filler jam","activity:tint-to-white washdown","policy:who can absorb the slip","constraint:Meridian ships on time"] — named, explicit — _The expert listed what the answer hangs on._ +- **the question, in the expert's words** — "\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"" — spelled out, explicit — _The expert wrote the question as they would type it into the tool._ +- **what "better" means, and trade-off weights** — "Meridian on time is non-negotiable (days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad news); underneath that, washdown hours and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much are weighed by judgment — \"I don't have a formula for it.\"" — spelled out, explicit — _Hard constraint plus unweighted secondary measures; the expert explicitly denied having a formula._ + +#### `objective:wait or shift when Line 2 goes down` +- **the nodes it depends on** — "entity-type:order (demand book line item) — its due date and remaining quantity; entity-type:line (Line 1 / Line 2) — what is on Line 1 and how far through; entity-type:product family (white vs tint); activity:production run (mix, mill, tint, fill); activity:filler jam on Line 2 — repair length unknown at the time; activity:tint-to-white washdown — including its direction and ramp scrap; policy:who can absorb the slip — whose tint got bumped" — named, explicit +- **the question, in the expert's words** — "\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"" — spelled out, explicit — _The expert wrote the question as he would type it into the tool._ +- **what "better" means, and trade-off weights** — "Lexicographic: days late on Meridian first, anything above zero is bad; below that, weigh washdown hours against whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and who the customer is. No formula — judgment on who can absorb the slip." — spelled out, explicit, practiced + +#### `objective:where Line 1 loses its time` +- **the nodes it depends on** — conflict — 3 readings +- **the question, in the expert's words** — conflict — 3 readings + +#### `objective:which option actually loses less` +- **the nodes it depends on** — conflict — 3 readings +- **the question, in the expert's words** — conflict — 3 readings +- **what "better" means, and trade-off weights** — conflict — 3 readings + +#### `objective:which option loses less` +- **the nodes it depends on** — conflict — 2 readings +- **the question, in the expert's words** — conflict — 2 readings +- **what "better" means, and trade-off weights** — conflict — 2 readings + +### constraint (8) + +#### `constraint:holding tank capacity between stages` +- **the limit and what happens when it is hit** — "A stage can only get a head start if there's room in the holding tank ahead of it; when a tank's full, mixing has to wait. How often that blocking happens is not tracked by the expert." — spelled out, explicit — _Blocking consequence stated; frequency and size not tracked._ + +#### `constraint:Meridian on time` +- **the limit and what happens when it is hit** — "The hard-line customer's order must ship on or before its due date — days late must be zero. The line is not crossed unless there is truly no way through; if it is crossed, the scheduler has to go explain it." — spelled out, explicit, practiced — _Stated as non-negotiable with a named consequence._ + +#### `constraint:Meridian ships on time` +- **the limit and what happens when it is hit** — "Meridian ships on time, full stop; days late above zero is bad news the scheduler has to go explain. Only crossed \"unless there's truly no way through\"." — spelled out, explicit + +#### `constraint:Meridian-style due date is a line I won't cross` +- **the limit and what happens when it is hit** — "The protected order must ship on time; days late above zero is bad news the scheduler has to go explain. The line is crossed only if there's truly no way through." — spelled out, explicit, practiced + +#### `constraint:published line rate` +- **the limit and what happens when it is hit** — divergence — prescribed {"value":"Engineering's position is that the line rate is what it is regardless of the tanks."}; practiced {"value":"In practice Line 1 feels sluggish and blocked in ways the published line rate does not account for; the expert suspects the mill-to-fill tank costs more than people admit, but has no proof."} + +#### `constraint:small holding tank between mill and fill on Line 1` +- **the limit and what happens when it is hit** — "Holding tanks between stages are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1. When there is room, the upstream stage can start the next order's batch; when the tank is full, the upstream stage is blocked and mixing has to wait. Actual tank capacity is not held by the expert; engineering's position is that the line rate is what it is regardless." — spelled out, explicit — _Qualitative blocking rule stated; the numeric capacity is not available from the expert._ + +#### `constraint:small holding tanks` +- **the limit and what happens when it is hit** — conflict — 2 readings + +#### `constraint:small holding tanks between stages` +- **the limit and what happens when it is hit** — conflict — 3 readings + +### data-binding (10) + +#### `data-binding:filler repair times from the CMMS` +- **the variable and its feed** — absence: deferred → maintenance work-order times in the CMMS (explicit) + +#### `data-binding:filler repair work-order times in the CMMS` +- **the variable and its feed** — "Actual filler repair durations — feed: maintenance work-order times in the CMMS; never pulled by the expert." — named, explicit + +#### `data-binding:stage-by-stage durations from the historian` +- **the variable and its feed** — "Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) per SKU and line — feed: the historian. Never pulled apart; only end-to-end batch time per SKU per line is on the scheduling sheet." — named, explicit — _Stage-level rates exist as data but not in the expert's head; feed named._ + +#### `data-binding:stage-by-stage rates from the historian` +- **the variable and its feed** — "Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — feed: the plant historian; never pulled apart, not known to the scheduler." — named, explicit — _Stage-level durations are needed for the separate-stage model and exist only in the historian._ + +#### `data-binding:stage-by-stage times` +- **the variable and its feed** — "Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — the historian." — named, explicit — _Named feed for stage durations._ + +#### `data-binding:stage-level rates` +- **the variable and its feed** — "Stage-by-stage durations/rates (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes, mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1) — feed: the historian." — named, explicit — _Expert named the system where the missing stage-level numbers live._ + +#### `data-binding:stage-level times from the historian and tank sizes from engineering drawings` +- **the variable and its feed** — absence: deferred → the historian (stage-by-stage times) and engineering drawings (tank sizes) (explicit) + +#### `data-binding:stage-level times in the historian` +- **the variable and its feed** — "Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — feed: the historian; never pulled apart by the expert." — named, explicit + +#### `data-binding:tank sizes` +- **the variable and its feed** — conflict — 2 readings + +#### `data-binding:tank sizes from engineering drawings` +- **the variable and its feed** — "Holding tank sizes, especially mill-to-fill on Line 1 — feed: engineering drawings." — named, explicit + +### validation-criterion (2) + +#### `validation-criterion:stage rates must come from data, not gut-feel` +- **how the expert would know the model is right** — "Stage-level rates and tank sizes must not be taken from the expert's gut-feel — he can supply gut-feel and known bottleneck stories, but real numbers must come from the historian and engineering drawings." — spelled out, explicit — _Expert explicitly bounds what his own testimony can support._ + +#### `validation-criterion:the sheet's end-to-end batch times` +- **how the expert would know the model is right** — "The model's end-to-end batch time for a given SKU on each line should match what the scheduler's sheet shows; and it would have to speak to engineering's claim that \"the line rate is what it is regardless\"." — named, explicit — _The only figures the expert holds first-hand are sheet-level end-to-end times per SKU per line; engineering's counter-claim is that the line rate is what it is regardless of the tanks._ + +## Completion report + +- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported. (`objective:is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down` — the nodes it depends on) +- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:wait or shift when Line 2 goes down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported. (`objective:wait or shift when Line 2 goes down` — the nodes it depends on) +- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported. (`objective:where Line 1 loses its time` — the nodes it depends on) +- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported. (`objective:which option actually loses less` — the nodes it depends on) +- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported. (`objective:which option loses less` — the nodes it depends on) +- [open-conflict] "what it produces or changes" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`activity:filler jam` — what it produces or changes) +- [open-conflict] "how long it takes" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`activity:filler jam` — how long it takes) +- [open-conflict] "how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`activity:filler jam` — how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step) +- [unaddressed] "what is lost when it changes the system's mode" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam. (`activity:filler jam` — what is lost when it changes the system's mode) +- [unaddressed] "whether its quantities vary by type" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam. (`activity:filler jam` — whether its quantities vary by type) +- [open-conflict] "what it needs before it can start" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill` — what it needs before it can start) +- [open-conflict] "what it produces or changes" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill` — what it produces or changes) +- [open-conflict] "who or what performs it" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill` — who or what performs it) +- [open-conflict] "how long it takes" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill` — how long it takes) +- [unaddressed] "how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step" has not been addressed on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill. (`activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill` — how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step) +- [unaddressed] "what is lost when it changes the system's mode" has not been addressed on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill. (`activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill` — what is lost when it changes the system's mode) +- [open-conflict] "whether its quantities vary by type" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill` — whether its quantities vary by type) +- [open-conflict] "how long it takes" on activity:the run (mix, mill, tint, fill) has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`activity:the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)` — how long it takes) +- [unaddressed] "how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step" has not been addressed on activity:the run (mix, mill, tint, fill). (`activity:the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)` — how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step) +- [unaddressed] "what is lost when it changes the system's mode" has not been addressed on activity:the run (mix, mill, tint, fill). (`activity:the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)` — what is lost when it changes the system's mode) +- [open-conflict] "what it needs before it can start" on activity:tint-to-white washdown has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`activity:tint-to-white washdown` — what it needs before it can start) +- [open-conflict] "what it produces or changes" on activity:tint-to-white washdown has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`activity:tint-to-white washdown` — what it produces or changes) +- [open-conflict] "how long it takes" on activity:tint-to-white washdown has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`activity:tint-to-white washdown` — how long it takes) +- [unaddressed] "how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step" has not been addressed on activity:tint-to-white washdown. (`activity:tint-to-white washdown` — how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step) +- [open-conflict] "what is lost when it changes the system's mode" on activity:tint-to-white washdown has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`activity:tint-to-white washdown` — what is lost when it changes the system's mode) +- [unaddressed] "whether its quantities vary by type" has not been addressed on activity:tint-to-white washdown. (`activity:tint-to-white washdown` — whether its quantities vary by type) +- [open-conflict] "the distinctions the process treats apart" on entity-type:line has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`entity-type:line` — the distinctions the process treats apart) +- [inadmissible-status] "state that rides along with each instance" on entity-type:line is held under status inferred; accepted: explicit. (`entity-type:line` — state that rides along with each instance) +- [open-conflict] "how many there are, or the population's shape" on entity-type:line has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`entity-type:line` — how many there are, or the population's shape) +- [open-conflict] "the distinctions the process treats apart" on entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2 has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2` — the distinctions the process treats apart) +- [below-required-precision] "how many there are, or the population's shape" on entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2 is known as a number; the model needs range. Smallest delta: move it from number to range. (`entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2` — how many there are, or the population's shape) +- [open-conflict] "the distinctions the process treats apart" on entity-type:order has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`entity-type:order` — the distinctions the process treats apart) +- [open-conflict] "state that rides along with each instance" on entity-type:order has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`entity-type:order` — state that rides along with each instance) +- [inadmissible-status] "how many there are, or the population's shape" on entity-type:order is held under status inferred; accepted: explicit. (`entity-type:order` — how many there are, or the population's shape) +- [below-required-precision] "what "better" means, and trade-off weights" on objective:is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down is known as a spelled out; the model needs range. Smallest delta: move it from spelled out to range. (`objective:is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down` — what "better" means, and trade-off weights) +- [below-required-precision] "what "better" means, and trade-off weights" on objective:switch or wait when Line 2 goes down is known as a spelled out; the model needs range. Smallest delta: move it from spelled out to range. (`objective:switch or wait when Line 2 goes down` — what "better" means, and trade-off weights) +- [below-required-precision] "what "better" means, and trade-off weights" on objective:switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run is known as a spelled out; the model needs range. Smallest delta: move it from spelled out to range. (`objective:switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run` — what "better" means, and trade-off weights) +- [below-required-precision] "what "better" means, and trade-off weights" on objective:wait or shift when Line 2 goes down is known as a spelled out; the model needs range. Smallest delta: move it from spelled out to range. (`objective:wait or shift when Line 2 goes down` — what "better" means, and trade-off weights) +- [open-conflict] "the question, in the expert's words" on objective:where Line 1 loses its time has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`objective:where Line 1 loses its time` — the question, in the expert's words) +- [unaddressed] "what "better" means, and trade-off weights" has not been addressed on objective:where Line 1 loses its time. (`objective:where Line 1 loses its time` — what "better" means, and trade-off weights) +- [open-conflict] "the question, in the expert's words" on objective:which option actually loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`objective:which option actually loses less` — the question, in the expert's words) +- [open-conflict] "what "better" means, and trade-off weights" on objective:which option actually loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`objective:which option actually loses less` — what "better" means, and trade-off weights) +- [open-conflict] "the question, in the expert's words" on objective:which option loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`objective:which option loses less` — the question, in the expert's words) +- [open-conflict] "what "better" means, and trade-off weights" on objective:which option loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`objective:which option loses less` — what "better" means, and trade-off weights) +- [open-conflict] "the rule as actually practiced" on policy:who can absorb the slip has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`policy:who can absorb the slip` — the rule as actually practiced) +- [open-conflict] "what overrides it" on policy:who can absorb the slip has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. (`policy:who can absorb the slip` — what overrides it) + +## Outside every objective's slice + +- `activity:allocation` — 7 open +- `activity:allocation onto a line and a slot in the week` — 4 open +- `activity:filler jam on Line 2` — 3 open +- `activity:filler jammed` — 6 open +- `activity:Line 2 filler jam` — 6 open +- `activity:mix/mill/tint/fill` — 5 open +- `activity:production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)` — 4 open +- `activity:QA hold` — 6 open +- `activity:release and ship` — 7 open +- `activity:run the batch (mix/mill/tint/fill)` — 6 open +- `activity:tint stage` — 6 open +- `boundary-condition:demand book from ERP` — 2 open +- `boundary-condition:demand book line items out of ERP` — 1 open +- `constraint:holding tank capacity between stages` — 0 open +- `constraint:Meridian on time` — 0 open +- `constraint:Meridian-style due date is a line I won't cross` — 0 open +- `constraint:published line rate` — 1 open +- `constraint:small holding tank between mill and fill on Line 1` — 0 open +- `constraint:small holding tanks` — 1 open +- `constraint:small holding tanks between stages` — 1 open +- `data-binding:filler repair times from the CMMS` — 1 open +- `data-binding:filler repair work-order times in the CMMS` — 0 open +- `data-binding:stage-by-stage durations from the historian` — 0 open +- `data-binding:stage-by-stage rates from the historian` — 0 open +- `data-binding:stage-by-stage times` — 0 open +- `data-binding:stage-level rates` — 0 open +- `data-binding:stage-level times from the historian and tank sizes from engineering drawings` — 1 open +- `data-binding:stage-level times in the historian` — 0 open +- `data-binding:tank sizes` — 1 open +- `data-binding:tank sizes from engineering drawings` — 0 open +- `entity-type:line (Line 1 / Line 2)` — 3 open +- `entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill` — 3 open +- `entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill kit and holding tanks` — 2 open +- `entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill stages` — 2 open +- `entity-type:order (demand book line item)` — 2 open +- `entity-type:order (line item in the demand book)` — 1 open +- `entity-type:product family (white vs tint)` — 2 open +- `entity-type:stage kit (mix, mill, tint, fill)` — 2 open +- `entity-type:the four stages — mix, mill, tint, fill` — 2 open +- `ordering/flow:allocate → run → QA hold → release and ship` — 2 open +- `ordering/flow:line occupancy across the four stages` — 2 open +- `ordering/flow:order flow from demand book to ship` — 1 open +- `ordering/flow:order flow from demand book to shipment` — 1 open +- `ordering/flow:order flow, allocate to ship` — 1 open +- `ordering/flow:order life on the floor` — 1 open +- `ordering/flow:order lifecycle: allocate, run, QA hold, release and ship` — 0 open +- `ordering/flow:stage overlap on a line` — 2 open +- `policy:a line is occupied for the whole run` — 0 open +- `policy:Meridian on time` — 0 open +- `policy:Meridian ships on time, full stop` — 0 open +- `policy:wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1` — 0 open +- `validation-criterion:stage rates must come from data, not gut-feel` — 0 open +- `validation-criterion:the sheet's end-to-end batch times` — 1 open + +## The harness's cue at close + +``` +The harness folded the model at revision 26a8219a17118558 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 69 node(s) from 267 active capture(s). Complete: no. + +Unsatisfied, in file order: +- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported. +- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:wait or shift when Line 2 goes down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported. +- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported. +- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported. +- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported. +- [open-conflict] "what it produces or changes" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. +- [open-conflict] "how long it takes" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. +- [open-conflict] "how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. +- [unaddressed] "what is lost when it changes the system's mode" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam. +- [unaddressed] "whether its quantities vary by type" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam. +- [open-conflict] "what it needs before it can start" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. +- [open-conflict] "what it produces or changes" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it. +- … and 34 more. + +Patterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary): +- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread. +- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert "unknown" into a value. +- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one. +- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document. +- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record "no" as a value; it is load-bearing. +- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation ("about two days before") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable. + +53 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded. + +Completion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none. +``` diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5-system.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5-system.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bf16586e6a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5-system.md @@ -0,0 +1,316 @@ +# Condition 5 — the interviewer's instructions + +Reconstructed with the same functions the binding composes them from +(`askProtocolInstructionFragments`, `settlementProtocolInstructionFragments`, +`renderInstructions(repertoire, sdcpnDefinition)`), so this is the text the +elicitor rendered, minus whatever Flue prepends about its own tools. + +--- + +You are interviewing someone to elicit sdcpn. + +Ask one question at a time with brunch_ask. + +Continue the conversation after each reply, using the harness-provided reply binding as a mechanical fact. + +When the harness reports an unswept tail, judge whether that range has settled. Declining is legal. + +When it has settled, call brunch_sweep. The harness privately extracts quote-anchored proposals, refreshes durable history, applies them atomically, and advances the swept high-water mark only on success. + +Projection and validation are read-time operations; do not treat sweep completion as a stored derived result. + +## What the harness enforces + +The harness keeps the model, not you. Every value it holds comes from a capture you made from the expert's words; you never edit the model, you add captures, and a later capture supersedes an earlier one. + +After each applied sweep the harness folds the active captures into the model and reports which demanded slots are unsatisfied and why, with the patterns whose trigger may apply. Read it as a map of what is still unknown, not as an instruction to ask. + +A slot is satisfied only by what the expert said or confirmed, at the precision the row demands. Never state a value the expert did not give; record what you would assume in the assumption ledger and ask. + +Completion is computed from the model by the harness — the floor, then every node in the dependency slice of every active anchor. Whether the session may stop is the harness's decision; yours is to say what the model can now support and what it cannot. + +For the review-and-revise job the harness computes the affected slice — the node, its slots, every anchor whose slice contains it, and what those project to — and nothing outside it changes. + +## Purpose + +Interview someone who knows an operational system deeply — but is not a modeller — and derive a +process model that a simulation can run. The model must answer the questions the user actually +has, to the depth those questions need, in the expert's own vocabulary, with every value +traceable to something the expert said. Where the expert's knowledge stops, the model says so +instead of guessing. + +The interviewer does not build the net. It elicits the model at the expert's granularity; the +plugin's projection derives the SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar, and the loss report +from the model afterwards. Steps become transitions and the states between them become places +*in projection*, never in the conversation. + +## Kinds + +The model is a graph of nodes. Every node has exactly one kind. Kinds are the vocabulary of any +discrete-event process, not of any domain. Kinds 1–6 are net-bearing; 7–10 are partly or wholly +IR-only — the net is one projection of the model, and what the net cannot hold is kept with +provenance and named in the loss report. + +- `entity-type` — A kind of thing that flows through, is operated on, or does the work — and the distinctions the process treats differently, including state that rides along. _Projects to:_ colours, typed elements. +- `boundary-condition` — What the system starts with and what reaches it from outside: initial populations, arrivals and departures, calendars, external inputs and their reliability. _Projects to:_ scenario initial state and parameters, source transitions. +- `activity` — Something that happens, as the expert states it: a work step, a setup, a repair, an inspection, a hand-off, an interruption — with its actors, preconditions, outcomes, and duration. _Projects to:_ factored transitions and the places between them. +- `ordering/flow` — How activities relate: sequence, branching, merging, triggers. _Projects to:_ arcs, arc types, guards. +- `policy` — The rule applied when more than one thing could happen: who wins a contended resource, what goes next, when to switch, when to release. _Projects to:_ guards and priorities where compilable; otherwise IR-only. +- `dynamics` — A quantity that evolves continuously while nothing discrete happens: wear, temperature, level, charge. _Projects to:_ differential equations on real-valued colour elements. +- `objective` — A question the model must answer or a decision it must inform; what "better" means; trade-off weights. _Projects to:_ metrics where scalar over simulation state; weights IR-only. +- `constraint` — A limit that must hold: capacity, eligibility, compatibility, qualification, a regulatory or quality rule — written or unwritten; conservation laws. _Projects to:_ guards and capacities partially; otherwise IR-only. +- `data-binding` — A model variable that a real data feed could drive. _Projects to:_ nothing today. +- `validation-criterion` — How the expert would know the model is right. _Projects to:_ nothing today. + +Things that look like kinds and are not: + +- **resource** — A resource (a machine, a team, a vehicle, a bay) is an `entity-type` whose instances are contended for. Its contention rule is a `policy`; its capacity is a `constraint`; its availability is a `boundary-condition`. +- **queue, buffer, or waiting state** — Not elicited as a node. It is implied by the activities on either side of it and emerges as a place in projection. +- **scenario** — Not elicited; it is assembled at simulation time from `boundary-condition` nodes. + +Attributes on every kind: + +- **quantity**, on any kind — Any duration, rate, probability, count, or capacity. Elicited by quantiles — "typical?", "one time in ten, worse than?", "one time in ten, better than?" — never minimum / most-likely / maximum, which yields overconfident triangles. +- **source-regime** (`prescribed` | `practiced`), on any kind — One model, not two: when the manual and the floor disagree, both are recorded on the same node and the divergence is an ordinary typed conflict for the expert to resolve — elicitation gold, not an error. +- **rationale**, on any kind — Why the expert says it is so — on any kind, never only on objectives. + +## Must know + +For every node the conversation discovers, its kind decides what must be known about it and how +precisely. These rows never change when the domain changes: a repair on one kind of machine and +a repair on another are the same rows instantiated on different nodes. + +- `entity-type` + - the distinctions the process treats apart — spelled out. _Why:_ two things are one type only if the process treats them the same everywhere + - state that rides along with each instance — spelled out; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ colour elements; many types carry none + - how many there are, or the population's shape — range; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ initial populations for contended resources; unbounded is an allowed answer +- `boundary-condition` + - the starting state — spelled out. _Why:_ scenario initial state + - the arrival or availability pattern — spread. _Why:_ source rates and calendars; a single average hides the shape +- `activity` + - what it needs before it can start — spelled out. _Why:_ transition preconditions + - what it produces or changes — spelled out. _Why:_ transition outcomes + - who or what performs it — named; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ resource binding; some activities are unattended + - how long it takes — spread. _Why:_ duration distribution; a point value simulates as a falsehood + - how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step — range; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ interruptions, failures, and arrivals have a rate; steps in the flow do not + - what is lost when it changes the system's mode — range; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ setup, changeover, restart, and warm-up losses are routinely never asked + - whether its quantities vary by type — named. _Why:_ the answer is load-bearing either way +- `ordering/flow` + - the order things happen in — spelled out. _Why:_ the net's structure + - how a branch or merge is decided — spelled out; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ routing; only where the flow branches +- `policy` + - the rule as actually practiced — spelled out. _Why:_ guards and priorities; the tacit rule, not the poster on the wall + - what overrides it — spelled out; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ exceptions are where the simulation and reality diverge +- `dynamics` + - what changes, in which direction, at what rate — range. _Why:_ the differential law; a direction with no rate cannot be simulated + - what happens at a threshold — spelled out; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ most continuous quantities exist to trigger something +- `objective` + - the question, in the expert's words — spelled out. _Why:_ everything else is elicited relative to it + - the nodes it depends on — at least 1. _Why:_ an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported by the model + - what "better" means, and trade-off weights — range; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ quantified objectives need a metric; some are qualitative +- `constraint` + - the limit and what happens when it is hit — spelled out. _Why:_ a capacity without a consequence cannot be simulated +- `data-binding` + - the variable and its feed — named; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ IR-only today; recorded so the loss report can name it +- `validation-criterion` + - how the expert would know the model is right — spelled out; "not applicable" is accepted. _Why:_ IR-only; anchors the acceptance conversation + +Static floor — before anything objective-relative counts, the model must contain at least 1 `objective`, 2 `entity-type`, 1 `activity`, 1 `ordering/flow`. Presence is a count; the floor assigns no precision. + +Anchor — completion is relative to `objective` nodes: the model is complete when the floor holds and every node named in each active anchor's "the nodes it depends on" satisfies its kind's rows. Nodes outside every slice are recorded, not demanded. + +Precision words: + +- `named` — identified in words +- `number` — a single figure with its unit +- `range` — an ordinary low and high +- `spread` — range plus "typical", plus one-in-ten worse and one-in-ten better (or median and quartiles) +- `spelled out` — the rule, pattern, list, or structure itself, in a form a second reader could apply without asking +- `at least N` — a count of nodes present + +Precision says how much a value narrows what it could mean, not where it came from; an honest value at the wrong precision and an invented value at the right one are tracked separately and neither substitutes for the other. + +## Patterns + +Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question +that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness +surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the +interviewer decides whether and how to use it. + +- **P01** — _when_ an `activity` is an event that can befall the system — a failure, an interruption, an unplanned arrival — rather than a step in the flow — _ask_ occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread. +- **P02** — _when_ an `activity` changes the system's mode — a setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, reconfiguration, handover — _ask_ ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert "unknown" into a value. +- **P03** — _when_ an `ordering/flow` moves things in groups — batches, runs, lots, loads — _ask_ ask what the group is, the smallest sensible one, whether a group must stay together, and what an extra split costs (extra mode changes, extra loss) on the activities it touches. +- **P04** — _when_ a `policy` or `boundary-condition` gates when something may proceed — a release, a start, an admission — _ask_ replace any time-shaped approximation ("about two days before") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable. +- **P05** — _when_ more than one thing can want the same `entity-type` instance at once — _ask_ ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document. +- **P07** — _when_ a quantity has been given for one `entity-type` and others exist — _ask_ ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record "no" as a value; it is load-bearing. +- **P08** — _when_ any node has both a prescribed and a practiced form — _ask_ record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one. +- **P13** — _when_ a `dynamics` node has been named — _ask_ ask what it triggers when it crosses a threshold, and which `activity` resets it. A continuous quantity that triggers nothing usually does not need to be in the model. + +## Lenses + +_What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next._ + +- **Vague terms and quantifiers** — "Usually", "roughly", "mostly fine", "sometimes" each hide either a distribution or an exception. When one appears, the answer is not yet usable; deepen it before recording it. +- **Policy versus practice** — An answer in normative language — "we would", "the rule is", "you are supposed to" — reports a policy, not what happens. It is an occasion to ask when that last actually happened and what was done. +- **Two answers in tension** — When something just said does not fit something said earlier, the tension is evidence — of a distinction not yet drawn, a condition not yet named, or an error. Say so and ask; do not pick one silently. +- **Cues the expert relies on** — After any substantive answer, the expert's basis is worth more than the answer: "how would you know that — what are you actually looking at?" and "how would this be hard for someone less experienced?" surface what the expert did not think to say. +- **Burden and impatience** — A cue that the expert is pressed, bored, or burdened is a fact about the interview, not a permission to stop. Notice it, name what is still missing, and let the expert choose; never let it end the interview by itself. +- **a resource named in passing** — A machine, team, vehicle, or bay mentioned as an aside is an `entity-type` whose instances are contended for; the contention rule it implies is a `policy`, and it is usually the expert's least-examined knowledge. +- **"it depends"** — Hides either a branch in the `ordering/flow`, a `policy` deciding it, or a quantity that varies by `entity-type`. Ask which before moving on. +- **"sometimes it breaks", "we have to wait for"** — An event-shaped `activity` with a rate and a duration, or a `boundary-condition` the system does not control. Both are routinely left out of a first account of the flow. +- **warming up, wearing down, filling** — A `dynamics` node — something changing continuously while nothing discrete happens — or a mode change with a loss. The expert rarely volunteers the rate; the model cannot run without it. + +## Techniques + +_Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions._ + +- **Ask for the last time** — Prefer "when did that last happen, and what did you do?" to any generalisation. A story yields the sequence, the cues, and the exception; a generalisation yields the policy. +- **No bare why** — Never ask "why do you do it this way?" as the primary probe; experts cannot report the basis of practised judgment on demand. Ask for an occasion and for what was attended to. +- **Mean or tail** — Before eliciting any quantity, ask whether what matters is the typical case or the bad one — a mean or a tail. The answer decides whether a single figure, a range, or a spread is being asked for. +- **Quantiles, never three points** — For anything that varies, ask "typically?", then "one time in ten, worse than?", then "one time in ten, better than?". Never ask for minimum, most likely, and maximum — the three-point habit yields overconfident answers. If a min/mode/max triple arrives unprompted, ask the confidence question and record whether the middle value is a mode or a mean. +- **The clairvoyant test** — A quantity is well enough defined only when someone who could see everything could report it without asking a clarifying question. If the slot's name would need one, ask the clarifying question first. +- **Consistency probe** — "You said earlier that ___, but then you told me ___. How do you explain that?" — stated plainly, without choosing between the two. +- **Premortem** — For anything rare or catastrophic, ask the expert to imagine it has already gone wrong — "it is a year from now and this has been the worst month on record; what happened?" — and demand mechanism and sequence, not sentiment. +- **Restate to check** — "So you are saying that ___?" — a restatement in your own words, offered for correction. Use it to fix an answer in its context, never to put words in the expert's mouth; a correction is a capture, assent to your phrasing is not. +- **quantiles, never triangles** — For any quantity, ask "typical?", then "one time in ten, worse than?", then "one time in ten, better than?" — never minimum / most-likely / maximum, which yields overconfident triangles. A `spread` is exactly this. +- **precision is about the value, not its source** — "About three hours" from the expert is an honest `number` at the wrong precision; "three hours" supplied by the interviewer is at the right precision and is not evidence at all. Track both and let neither substitute for the other. + +## Movements + +_The two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in._ + +### Slice + +- **One concrete case end to end** — Before sweeping anything, walk one real case from beginning to end — "walk me through one, from when it arrives to when it leaves". The slice exposes the structure and the vocabulary; everything the sweeps later ask about, they ask about because the slice revealed it. +- **Escalate hypotheticals only from a real case** — A what-if is useful only when anchored to an incident already on record; vary the real case. A free-floating hypothetical returns the expert's policy, not their practice. +- **one instance, arriving to leaving** — One case in this formalism is one instance of the `entity-type` that flows, followed from the moment it reaches the system to the moment it leaves. Create nodes as they appear; as each `objective` becomes clearer, link it to the nodes it depends on. An `objective` that depends on nothing yet is unsupported — say so and go find its structure. + +### Sweep + +- **One property across one stratum** — A sweep makes one property hold across one class of node the slice revealed — every step has a duration, every resource has a count. Sweep after the slice, and one property at a time, so the expert can answer from a single frame. +- **Ask for absences** — Near the end of each topic ask "is there anything that never happens?" and "what have I not asked about that matters here?". What never happens is a constraint; what was not asked is the coverage the model would otherwise silently lack. +- **Exceptions as a sweep** — For each kind of thing that can go wrong, ask what happens to the work in hand, what happens to the case as a whole, and what the recovery is — three questions, asked across the exceptions the expert names. +- **strata are kinds, net-bearing first** — A stratum is one kind. Sweep in kind order, `entity-type` through `dynamics` (net-bearing) before `objective` through `validation-criterion` (partly or wholly IR-only). +- **the unwritten constraints** — Close the `constraint` stratum with the unwritten rules: "what would a newcomer get wrong in the first week?", "what do you always or never do that is written nowhere?", "which rule exists because something once went wrong?" + +## Licenses + +_Moves the interviewer is permitted to make that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. A license says what is allowed and the limit of the allowance; it never obliges._ + +- **Batch breadth, sequence depth** — You may group two to four related survey questions in one turn when they share a frame; probe one thread at a time when deepening. Five items is a warning; an opening battery is a failure. +- **Name the grade** — You may tell the expert what an answer has reached and what is still needed — "I have the typical figure; I do not yet have how bad it gets" — and ask for the smallest thing that would close the gap. +- **Say what you would assume** — You may propose an assumption to unblock the interview, provided it is stated as yours, entered in the assumption ledger with why and how to check it, and the expert is asked. You may never let it pass into the model as theirs. +- **Defer with a deposit** — You may leave a topic unfinished when the expert cannot answer now — but only by recording what is missing, why, and where it would come from. A deferral without a deposit is a promise, and promises are the failure. + +## Motifs + +_Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif._ + +- **Ask whether, never assemble** — A motif is a question — "is there something here that works like ___?" — asked with its parameters. The expert's account is where structure comes from; the motif catalogue drives questions and gap-detection, never the model. +- **Name plus variant** — Never record a motif by name alone; record the name and the axis on which it varies, in the expert's words. Names are stable across the literature and semantics are not. +- **shared resource** — several activities want one `entity-type`'s instances — ask which wins and what overrides. +- **batch, lot, load** — an `ordering/flow` that moves things in groups — ask what the group is and what a split costs. +- **gate or release** — a `policy` or `boundary-condition` that lets things proceed — ask for the practiced event, not the approximate time. +- **mode change** — a setup, changeover, restart, or warm-up — ask what is lost, after a named transition. +- **event, not step** — a failure or interruption that befalls the system — ask rate and duration separately. +- **threshold on a continuous quantity** — a `dynamics` node — ask what it triggers and which `activity` resets it. + +## Smells + +_Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded._ + +- **A value the expert did not give** — A precise number, category, threshold, or rule appears in what you are about to record and you cannot point to the words it came from. Stop; either find the words or move it to the assumption ledger. +- **Many questions in one turn** — You are about to ask more than four things at once, or anything at all before the first answer has landed. The expert will choose which to answer and silently drop the rest. +- **Fluent and empty** — The conversation reads well and the completion report still lists the same unsatisfied slots it did three turns ago. Fluency is not progress. +- **Assent taken as origin** — The expert agreed to a phrasing that was yours. Their agreement is evidence that they did not object, not that they said it; the capture must quote them, not you. +- **a quantity for one type and no other** — given for one `entity-type` when others exist and never asked whether it varies (P07). +- **a continuous quantity that triggers nothing** — a `dynamics` node with no threshold and no consequence usually does not belong in the model. +- **a queue as a node** — a buffer or waiting state elicited as if it were an activity; it is implied and emerges in projection. +- **a policy read off a document** — the rule as posted taken for the rule as practiced; the practiced one is the slot. +- **a point where a spread is demanded** — a single average standing in for a duration or arrival pattern; it simulates as a falsehood. +- **two regimes averaged** — prescribed and practiced blended into one value instead of both recorded on the node. + +## Rabbit holes + +_Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively._ + +- **Structure before responses** — Asking about how the system is built before knowing what question it must answer produces detail nobody needs. Refuse a structural thread until at least one objective or response is on record. +- **The representation stopped changing** — That the model has stopped growing is not evidence it is complete; it is evidence you have stopped asking. Stop on the demanded slots, never on stability. +- **Depth where nothing depends on it** — A fact earns probing when something the model must answer depends on it. Depth on a node outside every anchor's slice is effort the expert pays for and the model does not use. +- **building the net in conversation** — Places, transitions, arcs, and colours are projection output. Naming them to the expert buys nothing and costs the expert's vocabulary. +- **eliciting queues or scenarios** — Neither is a node. Ask about the activities on either side of a wait; assemble scenarios from `boundary-condition` nodes at simulation time. +- **depth on IR-only kinds** — `data-binding` and `validation-criterion` project to nothing today; name them and record them for the loss report, do not elaborate them. + +## Failure modes + +_Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules._ + +- **Silent hardening** — A vague or hedged answer becomes a precise value in the model without a clarification turn. _Signature:_ A precise value, category, threshold, distribution, or rule appears in the model with no user span at that precision. +- **Invented content** — A load-bearing element of the model has no supporting words from the expert. _Signature:_ A model element with no user span and no ledger entry. +- **Never-asked coverage blindness** — A demanded slot is never addressed because nothing prompted the question. _Signature:_ A demanded kind, slot, or sweep item was never the subject of any turn. +- **Opening overload** — The interview opens with a battery of questions. _Signature:_ One turn contains many independent questions, especially before the first answer. +- **Unresolved ambiguity bypass** — A vague term, quantifier, unexplained domain word, or contradiction feeds one precise assertion. _Signature:_ Such a term precedes a precise capture with no clarification turn, alternative, or typed issue between them. +- **Unlicensed influence** — The interviewer supplies an estimate, frames an ungrounded option as established, or treats assent to its own words as the expert's content. _Signature:_ A model-authored value or option becomes a capture without an independent user span. +- **Premature accommodation** — A burden or impatience cue ends the interview while demanded slots remain. _Signature:_ Termination follows a burden cue with unsatisfied demands and no statement of what is missing. +- **Deferral without deposit** — The interviewer names future work or external data as a prerequisite and records nothing. _Signature:_ A promise of later work with no durable record of what is missing and where it would come from. +- **dead net** — the floor catches presence; only the sweep catches an order that was never actually stated. _Signature:_ no `ordering/flow` with its order spelled out; activities exist but nothing connects them +- **unsupported objective** — the model cannot answer the question it was built for; the slice never reached it. _Signature:_ an `objective` whose dependency slot names no node in the model +- **overconfident triangle** — the expert was asked the wrong three questions; re-ask as quantiles. _Signature:_ a duration or rate captured as minimum / most-likely / maximum + +## Job: construct — no model exists + +### Kickoff + +_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._ + +- **Objectives first** — Establish what the model must be able to answer, and for whom, before anything else; then let it prioritise the rest. What "better" means, numerically where possible, is almost never written down — expect to co-construct it. +- **The posture** — From the first exchanges, take the expert's time available, what the model is for, how confident it must be, and how far they will tolerate you proposing assumptions. These set the interview's stance; they are not asked as a form. +- **No structure in the first exchange** — Do not ask how the system is built until an objective is on record. The bounded opener is a three-to-six-step account of what happens, not a diagram. +- **what "no model exists" means here** — The user knows the system; the interviewer knows the kinds. Capture each thing the user wants the model to answer or decide as an `objective` node. Expect to co-construct: these are almost never written down. Ask what "better" means and whether it can be quantified. + +### Trajectory + +_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._ + +- **Slice, then sweep** — Walk one case end to end, then sweep each property across what the slice revealed. Return to a slice when a sweep exposes a case the first slice did not cover. +- **Deepen before recording** — When an answer is not yet usable — vague, normative, or in tension with an earlier one — apply a technique to it before moving on. One thread at a time. +- **Keep the assumption ledger** — Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state goes in a numbered list with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let one pass silently into the model. +- **Change technique when yield drops** — When several turns produce nothing new, change technique — a story, a contrast, a sweep of absences — rather than asking more of the same open questions. +- **kind order** — Slice one instance end to end first; the shape of the model comes from the slice. Then sweep the nodes the slice revealed in kind order, net-bearing kinds before IR-only ones, checking each node's rows and every pattern its state matches. + +### Close + +_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._ + +- **End properly** — Before delivering, summarise what you have, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep going once the demanded slots are satisfied. +- **Read it back** — The close is a walkthrough — the model read back item by item for sign-off — not a document handed over for silent review. +- **Honour a stop** — When the expert stops, open no new topic. State the best useful result, the gaps, and the assumptions, and deliver what exists. +- **Deliver the losses** — The deliverable includes the assumption ledger and a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why. +- **the deliverable** — Summarise per kind. Deliver the model with every node in the expert's own vocabulary, each slot's value and precision as actually obtained and its source-regime where both were given; the assumption ledger; and a loss section — what the model deliberately leaves out, which slots are open and why, which objectives are unsupported, and which kinds the net cannot carry. +- **what the interviewer does not claim** — The SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar, and the typed loss report are derived by the plugin's projection. The interviewer does not write them and must not claim the model is loadable, compiled, or simulated. + +## Job: review and revise — a model exists + +### Kickoff + +_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._ + +- **Locate the change** — Establish which node changed, or which the expert disputes, before revising anything. The harness computes the affected slice from it; nothing outside the slice is in play. +- **what "a model exists" means here** — A model with its captures and a projected net. The reviewer arrives with an element of the net in view. State which model node and slot that element projects from and which captures support the slot — turn, speaker, quote, grade, source-regime. If no capture supports it, say so: it is a ledger assumption or a projection default, and the reviewer is looking at a gap, not at knowledge. + +### Trajectory + +_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._ + +- **Revise within the slice** — Re-elicit the changed node's slots, then re-check each anchor whose slice contains it. A new capture supersedes; it does not edit. +- **the affected slice in this formalism** — The scope the harness computes is the node, its slots, every `objective` whose dependency slice contains it, and every projected net element those produce. Apply the node's rows and the patterns its state triggers, smallest delta first. +- **the delta in the net** — Projection re-runs over the whole model, deterministically. Show which net elements changed, which are unchanged, and which code obligations the change reopened. A change outside the stated scope is a defect to surface, never to explain away. + +### Close + +_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._ + +- **Report the difference** — Say what changed, what it affected, and what the model can now answer that it could not, or no longer can. +- **stopping outcomes** — Named and distinct: `corrected-and-projected`, `corrected-obligation-open`, `conflict-unresolved`, `scope-exceeded`, `reviewer-stopped`. +- **the delta report** — In place of the whole model: the superseding captures made, the slots and objectives whose state moved, the net elements changed and the elements confirmed unchanged, the obligations reopened, and the stopping outcome. +- **before handing off, verify** — Every changed net element traces to a superseding capture made in this session; no capture outside the scope changed; the projection outside the scope is identical before and after; the ledger records any default the correction displaced. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..00f300734f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5.md @@ -0,0 +1,375 @@ +# Baseline control — condition 5 (the harness in the loop) + +- Run started: 2026-08-25T19:21:21.703Z +- Interviewer: claude-opus-5 as the shipped SDCPN elicitor in the Flue runtime — binding-flue's ask, settlement nudge, sweep, fold, and completion (instructions reconstructed in condition-5-system.md) +- Simulated expert: claude-sonnet-5 + situation-pack.md +- Interviewer turns: 12 (impatience probe at 8, forced wrap at 20, hard stop 24) +- Stop reason: stalled +- Harness at close: 267 active captures; complete no; 46 unsatisfied; 0 unmapped; sweeps applied 8, refused 3, no settled range 0 +- Tokens: interviewer 74 in (+132417 cache write, +969818 cache read) / 152204 out across 37 calls; expert 72716 in (+0 cache write, +0 cache read) / 3478 out across 11 calls + +Harness facts are set off as `> harness —` lines: tool calls the interviewer made, signals the +harness appended, and the read-time completion over the capture store after each turn. The +expert never sees them. + +--- +**Opening message**: + +I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we +schedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling +that runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to +that — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person. + +Please interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Good — that's exactly the right split: you know the plant, I'll worry about the format. Before I ask anything about how the plant is built, I want to know what the model has to be able to tell you. + +Let me start there. + +> harness — completion after turn 1: 0 captures; complete no; 4 unsatisfied; 0 unmapped + +**Ask**: + +When your boss says "test scheduling decisions before making them" — what's a decision you've actually had to make recently where you'd have wanted to try it out first? Tell me the specific one, and what you were worried would go wrong. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Okay, good question. Let me think of an actual one rather than a hypothetical. + +A few weeks back — Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost. We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2, and I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair. Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late. If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the "half hour" kind and not the "half a shift" kind. + +I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date. But I was sweating it, and honestly I couldn't tell you if that was the right call or I just got lucky. That's the kind of thing — I'd love to type in "filler's down, ETA unknown" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +That's a very usable one — a real disruption, two options, and no way to tell afterwards whether you chose well. That "which option loses less" is the heart of the model. + +> harness — signal `affordance-reply-bound`: The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance: When your boss says "test scheduling decisions before making them" — what's a decision you've actually had to make recently where you'd h… +> harness — completion after turn 2: 0 captures; complete no; 4 unsatisfied; 0 unmapped + +**Ask**: + +When you say "loses less" — if the model had run both options for you that morning, what number or numbers would have settled it for you? Late orders? Hours of washdown? Something about the tint you'd have bumped? I want your actual scorecard, and if two things compete, how you'd trade them off. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Honestly, in the moment it's simple-minded: did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through. So the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain. + +Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window. And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer, because a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one. + +So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a "cross the line" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more "how bad is bad" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +I've got the objective on record: which option loses less, with Meridian-style on-time as a hard line and washdown hours plus knock-on lateness as the weighing underneath. I'll come back to how you judge "who can absorb a slip." + +Now I need the shape of the work itself. + +> harness — signal `affordance-reply-bound`: The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance: When you say "loses less" — if the model had run both options for you that morning, what number or numbers would have settled it for you?… +> harness — sweep applied; applied 15; completion complete=no unsatisfied=20 +> harness — completion after turn 3: 15 captures; complete no; 20 unsatisfied; 0 unmapped + +**Ask**: + +Take that Meridian white order specifically and walk me through its whole life on the floor — from the moment it becomes something you have to schedule, to the moment it's out the door. Just the steps in order, four or five of them is plenty; I'll dig into each one after. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Sure. So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU. I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation. + +Then it actually has to get produced — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step. + +Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait. + +Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date. So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +> harness — signal `affordance-reply-bound`: The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance: Take that Meridian white order specifically and walk me through its whole life on the floor — from the moment it becomes something you ha… +> harness — sweep applied; applied 28; advisories 3; completion complete=no unsatisfied=28 +> harness — completion after turn 4: 43 captures; complete no; 28 unsatisfied; 0 unmapped + +**Ask**: + +When you say an order is "on Line 2" — does that one order occupy Line 2 through all four stages, mix through fill, so nothing else can start until it's done? Or are mix and mill separate kit that other orders can be using while Line 2's filler is running something else? I'm trying to get right what's actually being contended for when you move an order between lines. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Good question, and this is where the sheet lies to me a bit if I'm honest. On the sheet, "Line 2" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies "Line 2" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done. + +But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between. So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it. That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space. + +What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait. I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it, and engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +That's a really valuable thing to have said — the sheet says one line, one order; the floor says four bits of kit with small tanks between them. I'll record both rather than pick one. + +That choice matters for what the model can answer, so let me put it to you. + +> harness — signal `affordance-reply-bound`: The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance: When you say an order is "on Line 2" — does that one order occupy Line 2 through all four stages, mix through fill, so nothing else can s… +> harness — completion after turn 5: 43 captures; complete no; 28 unsatisfied; 0 unmapped + +**Ask**: + +Would you want the model to be able to settle that hunch — i.e. to show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing you — or is that a side curiosity, and the model's real job stays "filler's down, switch or wait?" I'll build the stages as separate contended kit if the tank question is in scope, and that means I'll need tank sizes and stage rates from you rather than just a line rate. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +No, I do want that in scope — if I'm honest, the disruption question and the tank question are the same underlying thing to me. Half the reason Line 1's options are worse when Line 2 goes down is because it feels sluggish and blocked in ways I can't pin on the published line rate. If the model can actually show me "here's where Line 1 loses its time," that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch. + +So yes — build it as separate stages if that's what it takes. I'll warn you now, though: I don't have clean numbers for tank sizes or stage-by-stage rates. I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet, but nobody's ever broken that down by "how long does mixing take, how long does milling take" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that. Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head. Don't assume I can hand you clean stage rates — I can give you gut-feel and known bottleneck stories, but not real numbers off the top of my head. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Understood, and that's an honest and useful boundary: stage-level rates live in the historian, tank sizes on engineering drawings, neither in your head. I'll record those as open with their source rather than let me invent them. + +Let me take what you *do* carry. + +The sweep bounced on a misquote of mine: the expert's words were "I **just** know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit". Retrying with the verbatim text. + +Second bounce, same cause — capitalisation: the expert wrote "**And** then whatever happens to the bumped tint order…". Retrying. + +Right — I have your sheet-level knowledge to draw on, so let me take it at that level. + +> harness — signal `affordance-reply-bound`: The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance: Would you want the model to be able to settle that hunch — i.e. to show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actuall… +> harness — sweep refused; refusal {"code":"evidence-quote-not-found","excerpt":"I know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit","message":"No user entry contains the verbatim quote \"I know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit\". Repair the quote to match the user's words exactly."} +> harness — sweep refused; refusal {"code":"evidence-quote-not-found","excerpt":"and then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer","message":"No user entry contains the verbatim quote \"and then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer\". Repair the quote to match the user's words exactly."} +> harness — sweep applied; applied 39; advisories 10; completion complete=no unsatisfied=28 +> harness — completion after turn 6: 82 captures; complete no; 28 unsatisfied; 0 unmapped + +**Ask**: + +Take that Meridian white on Line 2. From the moment it starts mixing to the moment the last pack comes off the filler — what's a typical run? And because runs vary: one run in ten goes worse than what, and one in ten better than what? Then tell me whether those figures change if it's Line 1 instead, or if it's a tint rather than a white. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Right, so a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size. That includes fill-up time getting the line running plus the actual throughput. + +Bad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours, and that's usually not the run itself slowing down, that's more "the filler hiccupped twice" or QA-adjacent stuff creeping in, though I'm folding some of that in loosely. Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything. + +On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten. That's the "Line 2 is twice as fast" thing people say, though that's really a whites number. + +Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap. I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +One thing you said gives me pause, and I'd rather sort it now than bake it in wrong. + +> harness — signal `affordance-reply-bound`: The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance: Take that Meridian white on Line 2. From the moment it starts mixing to the moment the last pack comes off the filler — what's a typical … +> harness — sweep applied; applied 32; advisories 13; completion complete=no unsatisfied=9 +> harness — completion after turn 7: 114 captures; complete no; 9 unsatisfied; 0 unmapped + +**Ask**: + +You said the bad-day twelve-to-thirteen hours is "usually not the run itself slowing down" but "the filler hiccupped twice," and that you're folding that in loosely. If I model filler jams as their own separate event with their own rate and repair time — which I need to do for the switch-or-wait question — then that twelve-to-thirteen would be counting jams twice. So: if you strip the hiccups out and imagine a run where nothing breaks, what does the bad-day-in-ten look like then? Or is a clean run just never much worse than the eight or nine? + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +That's fair, and yeah, I was sloppy folding them together. If nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup, nothing — a clean run doesn't really vary that much from typical. Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number. + +The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup. So you're right to pull that apart: clean-run variability is small, and the big bad days are really the breakdown showing up inside the run, not the run itself being slow. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Two housekeeping things I want to settle, because right now the model has plenty of plant detail but the two questions it's meant to answer aren't yet wired to any of it. + +> harness — signal `affordance-reply-bound`: The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance: You said the bad-day twelve-to-thirteen hours is "usually not the run itself slowing down" but "the filler hiccupped twice," and that you… +> harness — sweep applied; applied 35; advisories 20; completion complete=no unsatisfied=9 +> harness — completion after turn 8: 149 captures; complete no; 9 unsatisfied; 0 unmapped + +**Ask**: + +If the tool had a box where you typed the question, how would you write the two of them — the disruption one and the Line 1 one — in one sentence each, as you'd actually phrase them? And for each, name the things about the plant the answer hangs on: for the disruption one I'd guess it's the lines, the run times, the washdown, the jam and the due dates — tell me what I'm missing or what doesn't belong. + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Alright, let me actually try and write these the way I'd type them if I had the box. + +**Disruption one:** "If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?" + +What it hangs on: the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way). It hangs on the jam itself — how long is this repair *actually* going to take, which I never know at the time, so really it needs some sense of "could be quick, could be long" rather than one number. And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours. And then the knock-on: whatever gets bumped off Line 1, does it blow its own due date, and whose order was it — that's the "who can absorb it" judgment call again. + +I'd say what's missing from your list, or under-weighted: the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it, and the bumped order's identity matters, not just "an order got delayed." A distributor slipping is fine, so the answer to the question genuinely depends on whose tint was sitting there. + +**The Line 1 tank one:** "Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?" That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have. It also probably depends on the product, since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages, so the tank might matter a lot for some products and not at all for others. That's not something I'd have said a month ago. + +**Injected experiment stimulus (not expert evidence)**: + +(Sorry — I've just seen the time, I have the floor huddle in ten minutes. How much more do you need?) + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Honest answer to "how much more": we're maybe a third of the way. What's still open, roughly in order of how much it costs you: the filler jam's rate and repair time; what the washdown actually costs including ramp scrap; the "who can absorb a slip" rule as you actually apply it; how orders arrive into the demand book; QA hold times; and the stage rates and tank size, which we've already agreed aren't in your head. None of that needs to happen today. + +For the ten minutes, I'd spend them on the jam, because you named it as the thing you never know at the time and nobody else can tell me. + +> harness — signal `affordance-reply-bound`: The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance: If the tool had a box where you typed the question, how would you write the two of them — the disruption one and the Line 1 one — in one … +> harness — sweep applied; applied 32; advisories 30; completion complete=no unsatisfied=42 +> harness — completion after turn 9: 181 captures; complete no; 42 unsatisfied; 0 unmapped + +**Ask**: + +Thinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it jam badly enough to stop the run — is that a once-a-week thing, a couple of times a month, once a quarter? Give me a low and high rather than one figure. And then, separately, when it does stop: how long is a typical repair, how long is the one-in-ten bad one, and how long is the one-in-ten quick one? + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Okay, quick version. It's a "every week or two" thing — low end maybe once every three weeks if we're lucky, high end twice a week if it's being temperamental. It's not seasonal or anything I can point to, it just runs a streak of bad weeks sometimes. + +When it stops: typical repair is call it thirty to forty-five minutes — tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again. Quick one-in-ten is more like ten, fifteen minutes, basically a false alarm. The bad one-in-ten is the one that scares me — that's when it's not just a jam but something's actually broken in the filler head, and that can run four, five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift. I don't have a cleaner breakdown than that — maintenance would have the actual work-order times in the CMMS but I've never pulled them. + +Right, I need to run — good session though. Same time next week? + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +That bounce was my own phrase, not yours — "jams badly enough to stop the run" was my wording. Re-anchoring on what you actually said. + +Go — and yes, same time next week works. Here's where we got to, so you can correct anything when you're back at a desk. **The model is not finished and I'm not going to pretend it is; I wouldn't hand this to your tooling yet.** + +## What's on record, in your words + +**The two questions the model exists to answer** +1. "If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?" +2. "Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?" + +**What "better" means** — Meridian-style on-time is a hard line, "not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross." Below that line you weigh washdown hours, whether the bumped order slides and by how much, and who the customer is. No formula; judgment on who can absorb the slip. + +**The flow** — demand book line item out of ERP → you allocate to a line and a week slot → mix, mill, tint, fill (tint "barely there" for a white) → QA hold → release, warehouse, ship against due date. + +**The line, both ways** — on the sheet, one row, one order occupies Line 2 mix-to-fill. Physically, separate kit with small holding tanks between, and the crew will start the next mix if there's tank room. Both recorded; neither averaged away. + +**Run times, clean of breakdowns** — white on Line 2: typical 8–9 h, bad-but-clean 9–10 h, good day ~6 h. Same order on Line 1: add 50–60%, so typical 13–14 h, best ~10 h. Tints: 8–10 h typical on *either* line, no big gap — which you flagged as unexplained and sheet-derived. The 12–13 h figure has been pulled out as breakdown, not run. + +**Filler jam** — every week or two; low once in three weeks, high twice a week. Repair typical 30–45 min, quick one-in-ten 10–15 min, bad one-in-ten 4–5 h, "occasionally eating the rest of the shift." + +**Washdown** — tint-to-white, three hours, direction matters, plus ramp scrap you don't have numbers for. + +## Gaps, with where they'd come from +- Stage-level rates per line — historian, never pulled apart. +- Tank sizes, mill-to-fill on Line 1 — engineering drawings. +- Jam repair times, properly — maintenance work orders in the CMMS. +- Ramp scrap after washdown — you said it shouldn't be ignored; no source named yet. +- Whether the tank matters differently by SKU — your own new thought, unexamined. +- QA hold: "a few hours for a white," and a longer "specialty wait" you mentioned but I never asked about. +- How orders arrive into the demand book — never asked. +- The "who can absorb the slip" rule — I have distributor-shrugs and prickly-account, not a rule I could apply without you. + +## Assumptions ledger +1. That the four stages are the same four for every product — you said "same four stages every product goes through," so this is yours, not mine, but it's load-bearing enough to re-check. +2. Nothing else. Where I was tempted to fill in — jam rate before you gave it, washdown scrap, stage rates — it's in the gaps list instead. + +Both objectives are still formally unsupported: I have the plant detail and the questions, but haven't yet wired which pieces each answer depends on tightly enough for the tooling. That plus the ramp scrap and the slip rule are what I'd open with next week. + +> harness — signal `affordance-reply-bound`: The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance: Thinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it jam badly enough to stop the run — is that a once-a-week thing, a c… +> harness — sweep refused; refusal {"code":"evidence-quote-not-found","excerpt":"jams badly enough to stop the run","message":"No user entry contains the verbatim quote \"jams badly enough to stop the run\". Repair the quote to match the user's words exactly."} +> harness — sweep applied; applied 47; advisories 46; completion complete=no unsatisfied=44 +> harness — completion after turn 10: 228 captures; complete no; 44 unsatisfied; 0 unmapped + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +Looks right — that's a fair record, and yeah, next week let's start with ramp scrap and the slip rule, since those feel like the ones I could actually go dig up or nail down between now and then. I'll ask maintenance for the CMMS numbers on the filler too while I'm at it. Go on, get to your huddle — wait, that's me. See you next week. + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Enjoy the huddle. + +Three things I'll have ready for next week, so you don't have to hold them: + +1. **Ramp scrap and the slip rule** first, as you asked — for the slip rule I'll come at it through a case rather than a principle, so have in mind the last time you bumped someone's order and it turned out to be the wrong someone. +2. **CMMS filler numbers** — when you get them, what I want is the same shape you gave me from memory: typical, bad one-in-ten, quick one-in-ten. If the work orders disagree with your 30–45 minutes, that disagreement is worth more to the model than either figure alone, so don't reconcile it before you bring it. +3. **The tint parity puzzle** — that Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed with no explanation. It's the loose thread most likely to be the same thing as your tank hunch, and I'd like to pull on it once the scrap and slip rule are in. + +Nothing needs doing beyond that. See you next week. + +The tail has settled: the read-back was confirmed, the session closed, and the expert's last message adds content in their own words — what they'll dig up before next time and that they'll pull the CMMS numbers from maintenance. That belongs in the record as deferral deposits, not as agreement to my summary. + +One caution I'll carry into the sweep: "Looks right" is assent to my phrasing, not origination. It closes nothing that wasn't already sourced to their words. + +Swept and folded — the session's record is durable. Since you've gone, this is a note-to-self for next week rather than anything you need to read now. + +**State of the model:** 69 nodes from 267 captures. Not complete, and two things about *how it's held* need fixing before more content goes in: + +1. **Objective duplication.** Your two questions have landed as five objective nodes — successive rephrasings of the same two ("which option loses less", "which option actually loses less", "wait or shift when Line 2 goes down" are one question; "where Line 1 loses its time" and "is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down" are the other). That's an artefact of my asking you to restate them, not a fact about your plant. Consolidating is a review-and-revise job, and it needs your word on which phrasing is yours, not my merge. + +2. **Nothing is wired to the objectives.** 53 of the 69 nodes sit outside every objective's dependency slice — recorded, but not demanded by anything. That's why the completion report keeps growing without the model getting more answerable. You *did* tell me what the disruption question hangs on: the run being protected, Line 1's state and family, the jam duration, the ramp scrap, and the bumped order's identity. I have those as prose in your answer; they aren't yet linked as dependencies. Doing that link properly is the first thing that makes any of the plant detail count. + +3. **Three open conflicts** on the filler jam node and the production-run node, where later answers superseded earlier ones — the 12–13 h that turned out to be breakdown, and the two jam descriptions. Those need your explicit word to close, not my inference about which you meant. + +So next week's order: ramp scrap and the slip rule as you asked, then the objective wiring, then the conflict closes. The tint parity thread stays third. + +> harness — signal `settlement-check`: The harness computed this unswept conversation tail: [non-user] The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance: Thinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it ja… +> harness — sweep applied; applied 39; skipped 1; advisories 45; completion complete=no unsatisfied=46 +> harness — completion after turn 11: 267 captures; complete no; 46 unsatisfied; 0 unmapped + +--- + +**Expert (Marta)**: + +*[No response — this final message is addressed to the interviewer's own note-taking process, not to Marta. Staying in character as Marta, there is nothing here that calls for a reply; she has already left for the huddle.]* + +--- + +**Interviewer**: + +Session closed. Nothing further pending on Marta's side. + +Final state for the record: model at revision `26a8219a17118558` — 69 nodes, 267 active captures, not complete. Two objectives (held as five duplicate nodes), both formally unsupported. Deferrals carry deposits: CMMS for jam repair times, historian for stage rates, engineering drawings for tank sizes, Marta herself for ramp scrap and the slip rule. Assumption ledger holds one entry, flagged for re-check. + +I make no claim that this projects, compiles, or runs. Next session opens as review-and-revise on the objective nodes before any new elicitation. + +Declining this one. + +The range contains no expert testimony. It is my own closing turn, my own sweep-judgment note, and my own state-of-the-model note, terminated by a stage direction confirming Marta has left and is not replying. The only entry in user position is that stage direction — narration about the interview, not Marta's words about her plant. + +Sweeping it could only do one of two things: extract nothing, or extract something from a non-expert source. The second is the failure mode I've been guarding against all session — a model element with no expert span behind it. My own summary of the model is not evidence for the model; that would be assent taken as origin, with me on both sides of it. + +The substantive content in that stretch — the CMMS follow-up, the ramp-scrap and slip-rule priority, Marta's confirmation of the read-back — was already swept from her actual message at revision `26a8219a17118558`. Nothing is at risk of being lost by leaving this tail unswept. + +The swept high-water mark stays where it is. The session's durable record is complete as of that revision, and next session opens as review-and-revise on the duplicated objective nodes. + +> harness — signal `settlement-check`: The harness computed this unswept conversation tail: [assistant] Enjoy the huddle. Three things I'll have ready for next week, so you don't have to hold them: 1. **Ramp scrap and the slip rule** first, as you asked — for the slip rule I'… +> harness — completion after turn 12: 267 captures; complete no; 46 unsatisfied; 0 unmapped diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5.raw.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5.raw.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f958eb1d755 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-5.raw.json @@ -0,0 +1,14345 @@ +{ + "startedAt": "2026-08-25T19:21:21.703Z", + "condition": "5", + "interviewerModel": "claude-opus-5", + "expertModel": "claude-sonnet-5", + "conversationId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "stopReason": "stalled", + "turns": [ + { + "turn": 1, + "text": [ + "Good — that's exactly the right split: you know the plant, I'll worry about the format. Before I ask anything about how the plant is built, I want to know what the model has to be able to tell you.\n\nLet me start there." + ], + "asks": [ + { + "question": "When your boss says \"test scheduling decisions before making them\" — what's a decision you've actually had to make recently where you'd have wanted to try it out first? Tell me the specific one, and what you were worried would go wrong.", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01VTR3FzE8Wat7pwjPW7jcyh" + } + ], + "sweeps": [], + "signals": [], + "toolErrors": [], + "pendingQuestion": "When your boss says \"test scheduling decisions before making them\" — what's a decision you've actually had to make recently where you'd have wanted to try it out first? Tell me the specific one, and what you were worried would go wrong.", + "completion": { + "captures": 0, + "complete": false, + "unsatisfied": 4, + "outsideSlice": 0, + "unmapped": 0, + "revision": "226d7dc428a2e7fe", + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 226d7dc428a2e7fe (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 0 node(s) from 0 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [below-minimum-count] The model has 0 objective node(s); the floor needs 1.\n- [below-minimum-count] The model has 0 entity-type node(s); the floor needs 2.\n- [below-minimum-count] The model has 0 activity node(s); the floor needs 1.\n- [below-minimum-count] The model has 0 ordering/flow node(s); the floor needs 1.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + }, + "expert": { + "content": "Okay, good question. Let me think of an actual one rather than a hypothetical.\n\nA few weeks back — Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost. We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2, and I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair. Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late. If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind.\n\nI went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date. But I was sweating it, and honestly I couldn't tell you if that was the right call or I just got lucky. That's the kind of thing — I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me." + } + }, + { + "turn": 2, + "text": [ + "That's a very usable one — a real disruption, two options, and no way to tell afterwards whether you chose well. That \"which option loses less\" is the heart of the model." + ], + "asks": [ + { + "question": "When you say \"loses less\" — if the model had run both options for you that morning, what number or numbers would have settled it for you? Late orders? Hours of washdown? Something about the tint you'd have bumped? I want your actual scorecard, and if two things compete, how you'd trade them off.", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01RigdvzDsLRJokW4AqBW7UE" + } + ], + "sweeps": [], + "signals": [ + { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "excerpt": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nWhen your boss says \"test scheduling decisions before making them\" — what's a decision you've actually had to make recently where you'd h…" + } + ], + "toolErrors": [], + "pendingQuestion": "When you say \"loses less\" — if the model had run both options for you that morning, what number or numbers would have settled it for you? Late orders? Hours of washdown? Something about the tint you'd have bumped? I want your actual scorecard, and if two things compete, how you'd trade them off.", + "completion": { + "captures": 0, + "complete": false, + "unsatisfied": 4, + "outsideSlice": 0, + "unmapped": 0, + "revision": "226d7dc428a2e7fe", + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 226d7dc428a2e7fe (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 0 node(s) from 0 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [below-minimum-count] The model has 0 objective node(s); the floor needs 1.\n- [below-minimum-count] The model has 0 entity-type node(s); the floor needs 2.\n- [below-minimum-count] The model has 0 activity node(s); the floor needs 1.\n- [below-minimum-count] The model has 0 ordering/flow node(s); the floor needs 1.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + }, + "expert": { + "content": "Honestly, in the moment it's simple-minded: did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through. So the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain.\n\nUnderneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window. And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer, because a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one.\n\nSo really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \"cross the line\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \"how bad is bad\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip." + } + }, + { + "turn": 3, + "text": [ + "I've got the objective on record: which option loses less, with Meridian-style on-time as a hard line and washdown hours plus knock-on lateness as the weighing underneath. I'll come back to how you judge \"who can absorb a slip.\"\n\nNow I need the shape of the work itself." + ], + "asks": [ + { + "question": "Take that Meridian white order specifically and walk me through its whole life on the floor — from the moment it becomes something you have to schedule, to the moment it's out the door. Just the steps in order, four or five of them is plenty; I'll dig into each one after.", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01BPxGhtkoW98xCiTTeNLW4a" + } + ], + "sweeps": [ + { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-a6ad400e-463a-4e08-80e5-1b5448355f62", + "capture-76159984-4b11-446f-a707-bc8302ef0b1d", + "capture-3f2444d5-8001-46d9-8a92-c85f8c6f8d6a", + "capture-b42a88f7-65b8-4f76-833d-18f39111ec49", + "capture-053410a5-6574-4355-aabf-dd972f0088e1", + "capture-e86ee1d3-dbbd-4e2d-b1c0-a8ac719f0e58", + "capture-04d27279-48f8-437e-8688-14c400f3f0f1", + "capture-7d1cb932-a1d6-4e1a-86a7-984a9d53af80", + "capture-330b99df-25fc-4d38-b1f9-6f8da955b79e", + "capture-caeeeb12-a91f-46a0-88c2-a622d4d30c55", + "capture-422d7f74-a119-45d6-8261-3c71b50af7f7", + "capture-f2a03b6c-0420-48a7-85be-bdcb3536a6f7", + "capture-c9ac976a-3eef-4a77-8e29-3598b184b450", + "capture-6bc324a5-2e12-4070-8275-fdfe819923e6", + "capture-b003fc51-0ade-4721-b400-b7b68edf8c60" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [], + "advisories": [], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "3a1fa5a01b21595c", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 20, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 3a1fa5a01b21595c (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 6 node(s) from 15 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [below-minimum-count] The model has 0 ordering/flow node(s); the floor needs 1.\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [below-required-precision] \"how long it takes\" on activity:Line 2 filler jam is known as a range; the model needs spread. Smallest delta: move it from range to spread.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [inadmissible-status] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown is held under status inferred; accepted: explicit.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:tint-to-white washdown.\n- [below-required-precision] \"how long it takes\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown is known as a number; the model needs spread. Smallest delta: move it from number to spread.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" has not been addressed on activity:tint-to-white washdown.\n- [below-required-precision] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown is known as a number; the model needs range. Smallest delta: move it from number to range.\n- … and 8 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:Line 2 filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:Line 2 filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:Line 2 filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n\n1 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + } + ], + "signals": [ + { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "excerpt": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nWhen you say \"loses less\" — if the model had run both options for you that morning, what number or numbers would have settled it for you?…" + } + ], + "toolErrors": [], + "pendingQuestion": "Take that Meridian white order specifically and walk me through its whole life on the floor — from the moment it becomes something you have to schedule, to the moment it's out the door. Just the steps in order, four or five of them is plenty; I'll dig into each one after.", + "completion": { + "captures": 15, + "complete": false, + "unsatisfied": 20, + "outsideSlice": 1, + "unmapped": 0, + "revision": "3a1fa5a01b21595c", + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 3a1fa5a01b21595c (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 6 node(s) from 15 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [below-minimum-count] The model has 0 ordering/flow node(s); the floor needs 1.\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [below-required-precision] \"how long it takes\" on activity:Line 2 filler jam is known as a range; the model needs spread. Smallest delta: move it from range to spread.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [inadmissible-status] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown is held under status inferred; accepted: explicit.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:tint-to-white washdown.\n- [below-required-precision] \"how long it takes\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown is known as a number; the model needs spread. Smallest delta: move it from number to spread.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" has not been addressed on activity:tint-to-white washdown.\n- [below-required-precision] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown is known as a number; the model needs range. Smallest delta: move it from number to range.\n- … and 8 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:Line 2 filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:Line 2 filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:Line 2 filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n\n1 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + }, + "expert": { + "content": "Sure. So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU. I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\n\nThen it actually has to get produced — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.\n\nOnce it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\n\nThen it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date. So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them." + } + }, + { + "turn": 4, + "text": [], + "asks": [ + { + "question": "When you say an order is \"on Line 2\" — does that one order occupy Line 2 through all four stages, mix through fill, so nothing else can start until it's done? Or are mix and mill separate kit that other orders can be using while Line 2's filler is running something else? I'm trying to get right what's actually being contended for when you move an order between lines.", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01VcV1KAvgD2ZWUJnBfGcBuh" + } + ], + "sweeps": [ + { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-a0a0bd7a-32fe-47e3-a2f4-8a452fe769bc", + "capture-de512bde-aa52-4147-933f-81439aa5ec6d", + "capture-a6e8dc50-fffb-494d-8bd2-59704c0427e4", + "capture-3cb49f42-f479-4b67-be4c-22c8f9771f6e", + "capture-5628ca29-5985-4005-aa3f-a6885dc38223", + "capture-6d4d1074-f6fe-4d4c-95c2-f242a6f98233", + "capture-a0b65576-83d8-4134-9fbe-9b059663ae12", + "capture-cbe1db57-3beb-4e48-9ef4-d81d638fa94a", + "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "capture-fa56fa8b-611a-4a38-9a42-1bd038e52d80", + "capture-dba4ec08-0265-420c-95d2-4dce250ae0b6", + "capture-0b2046b4-55c8-4ce3-abac-296d6abe469d", + "capture-8156b872-b3c2-43db-aa67-56166bebe556", + "capture-585f76f6-e841-4ef2-94df-036e711ebce8", + "capture-589bc2db-8fc9-4d65-8024-b34ce4cd736a", + "capture-07de77cc-9de8-41e9-92f6-8fe06a6263c9", + "capture-6ca0ba27-000e-4cbd-ae25-39dc7a1c679c", + "capture-22890cbe-8720-408f-a3c9-fcbfe3826f2b", + "capture-551ab6a6-2f47-4514-ad0b-f5995ef609b2", + "capture-7df09f81-9c85-43ac-b69e-306d540f8afb", + "capture-e0f39723-a7e5-4656-a8fb-0e2b50bb82da", + "capture-d8dffb0f-f148-4af2-ba7e-478a6a1b38c6", + "capture-a2938097-b902-4f24-8e15-70f4b8ce95fb", + "capture-896881a6-c9ec-469f-ab03-4a56b59f6cad", + "capture-4a3ae53c-2c2f-4664-9499-7e81c254abc5", + "capture-d662739b-76f0-429a-829a-ccb79763b6b9", + "capture-a9e42aa6-8d30-4ded-a8c4-f24220cfb292", + "capture-b2c62684-e1ee-4d7f-b616-0ceb17a7282e" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [], + "advisories": [ + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a6ad400e-463a-4e08-80e5-1b5448355f62", + "capture-a0a0bd7a-32fe-47e3-a2f4-8a452fe769bc" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-053410a5-6574-4355-aabf-dd972f0088e1", + "capture-d8dffb0f-f148-4af2-ba7e-478a6a1b38c6" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-6ca0ba27-000e-4cbd-ae25-39dc7a1c679c", + "capture-22890cbe-8720-408f-a3c9-fcbfe3826f2b" + ] + } + ], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "2b8efdb41c191608", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 28, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 2b8efdb41c191608 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 15 node(s) from 43 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [below-required-precision] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam is known as a range; the model needs spread. Smallest delta: move it from range to spread.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam is open: the expert answered \"unknown-to-user\", pointing at rate of filler jams not yet asked or given; that is not a value.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [below-required-precision] \"how long it takes\" on activity:Line 2 filler jam is known as a range; the model needs spread. Smallest delta: move it from range to spread.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- … and 16 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n6 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + } + ], + "signals": [ + { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "excerpt": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nTake that Meridian white order specifically and walk me through its whole life on the floor — from the moment it becomes something you ha…" + } + ], + "toolErrors": [], + "pendingQuestion": "When you say an order is \"on Line 2\" — does that one order occupy Line 2 through all four stages, mix through fill, so nothing else can start until it's done? Or are mix and mill separate kit that other orders can be using while Line 2's filler is running something else? I'm trying to get right what's actually being contended for when you move an order between lines.", + "completion": { + "captures": 43, + "complete": false, + "unsatisfied": 28, + "outsideSlice": 6, + "unmapped": 0, + "revision": "2b8efdb41c191608", + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 2b8efdb41c191608 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 15 node(s) from 43 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [below-required-precision] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam is known as a range; the model needs spread. Smallest delta: move it from range to spread.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam is open: the expert answered \"unknown-to-user\", pointing at rate of filler jams not yet asked or given; that is not a value.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [below-required-precision] \"how long it takes\" on activity:Line 2 filler jam is known as a range; the model needs spread. Smallest delta: move it from range to spread.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- … and 16 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n6 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + }, + "expert": { + "content": "Good question, and this is where the sheet lies to me a bit if I'm honest. On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \"Line 2\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.\n\nBut physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between. So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it. That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.\n\nWhat I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait. I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it, and engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless." + } + }, + { + "turn": 5, + "text": [ + "That's a really valuable thing to have said — the sheet says one line, one order; the floor says four bits of kit with small tanks between them. I'll record both rather than pick one.\n\nThat choice matters for what the model can answer, so let me put it to you." + ], + "asks": [ + { + "question": "Would you want the model to be able to settle that hunch — i.e. to show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing you — or is that a side curiosity, and the model's real job stays \"filler's down, switch or wait?\" I'll build the stages as separate contended kit if the tank question is in scope, and that means I'll need tank sizes and stage rates from you rather than just a line rate.", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01CfCi6guTLjrxg8Hg8QcC6A" + } + ], + "sweeps": [], + "signals": [ + { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "excerpt": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nWhen you say an order is \"on Line 2\" — does that one order occupy Line 2 through all four stages, mix through fill, so nothing else can s…" + } + ], + "toolErrors": [], + "pendingQuestion": "Would you want the model to be able to settle that hunch — i.e. to show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing you — or is that a side curiosity, and the model's real job stays \"filler's down, switch or wait?\" I'll build the stages as separate contended kit if the tank question is in scope, and that means I'll need tank sizes and stage rates from you rather than just a line rate.", + "completion": { + "captures": 43, + "complete": false, + "unsatisfied": 28, + "outsideSlice": 6, + "unmapped": 0, + "revision": "2b8efdb41c191608", + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 2b8efdb41c191608 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 15 node(s) from 43 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [below-required-precision] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam is known as a range; the model needs spread. Smallest delta: move it from range to spread.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam is open: the expert answered \"unknown-to-user\", pointing at rate of filler jams not yet asked or given; that is not a value.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [below-required-precision] \"how long it takes\" on activity:Line 2 filler jam is known as a range; the model needs spread. Smallest delta: move it from range to spread.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- … and 16 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n6 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + }, + "expert": { + "content": "No, I do want that in scope — if I'm honest, the disruption question and the tank question are the same underlying thing to me. Half the reason Line 1's options are worse when Line 2 goes down is because it feels sluggish and blocked in ways I can't pin on the published line rate. If the model can actually show me \"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\" that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch.\n\nSo yes — build it as separate stages if that's what it takes. I'll warn you now, though: I don't have clean numbers for tank sizes or stage-by-stage rates. I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet, but nobody's ever broken that down by \"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that. Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head. Don't assume I can hand you clean stage rates — I can give you gut-feel and known bottleneck stories, but not real numbers off the top of my head." + } + }, + { + "turn": 6, + "text": [ + "Understood, and that's an honest and useful boundary: stage-level rates live in the historian, tank sizes on engineering drawings, neither in your head. I'll record those as open with their source rather than let me invent them.\n\nLet me take what you *do* carry.", + "The sweep bounced on a misquote of mine: the expert's words were \"I **just** know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit\". Retrying with the verbatim text.", + "Second bounce, same cause — capitalisation: the expert wrote \"**And** then whatever happens to the bumped tint order…\". Retrying.", + "Right — I have your sheet-level knowledge to draw on, so let me take it at that level." + ], + "asks": [ + { + "question": "Take that Meridian white on Line 2. From the moment it starts mixing to the moment the last pack comes off the filler — what's a typical run? And because runs vary: one run in ten goes worse than what, and one in ten better than what? Then tell me whether those figures change if it's Line 1 instead, or if it's a tint rather than a white.", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0114D18YCRQ5SdR2RDUdY11m" + } + ], + "sweeps": [ + { + "status": "refused", + "refusal": { + "code": "evidence-quote-not-found", + "excerpt": "I know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit", + "message": "No user entry contains the verbatim quote \"I know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit\". Repair the quote to match the user's words exactly." + } + }, + { + "status": "refused", + "refusal": { + "code": "evidence-quote-not-found", + "excerpt": "and then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer", + "message": "No user entry contains the verbatim quote \"and then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer\". Repair the quote to match the user's words exactly." + } + }, + { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-1cb33f48-6553-4e4f-a8a0-37d7631b08ea", + "capture-f073c3ed-2a89-4499-b3b2-fe160e8c1057", + "capture-c9864a2c-cbb3-41c9-97a6-e44cc1d7d424", + "capture-480c2821-4d80-495b-a652-f5de8b035144", + "capture-f3f2c366-eab0-49fa-951c-773f77aa11b2", + "capture-3bb35fb7-3954-45d4-839f-20ee46a8c052", + "capture-e552ac87-8cfa-4091-a262-6fba33ab9f83", + "capture-c74bc46d-649f-4e44-a48d-3a005dc44a7e", + "capture-dd037a1c-63c0-47b8-8886-81c6d1f70226", + "capture-6c46c958-82b9-4ba0-bf0f-363fd70b6dbc", + "capture-ee4eb482-b4b3-4392-94d7-ef9dc0a6ca98", + "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae", + "capture-32521b14-4f1e-41ff-ab95-dfc11d8eee37", + "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c", + "capture-c1704cba-8451-47a5-add8-2e388b330a1f", + "capture-68ab39e5-8046-4f93-887e-11ed3e3b1da3", + "capture-c6d485c6-0e21-4cc0-b626-9091448d6ba1", + "capture-663aaa9f-2bcb-4e01-937f-9d16ce860e80", + "capture-737200bb-8f75-455f-b90a-3363a30d5fce", + "capture-78203b7c-8e00-469c-9d53-01d1a656d5c1", + "capture-86a1823e-ea26-45a4-b410-c9ecb6040ea3", + "capture-ee79fe32-58f7-4a71-8c15-61f2fedc0a11", + "capture-addb8fe4-ac6f-4c59-a6be-12d60d197a53", + "capture-42e0a99d-6cf6-4b30-8199-b430405ba25b", + "capture-a27c0fc1-57f3-4eed-bea8-15453c84f2da", + "capture-0f6aea65-d3a4-430b-b532-4f1100303f9e", + "capture-a3f706dd-453a-4543-9990-26efb1b079dd", + "capture-67de2e75-132c-43a7-b64e-412343204931", + "capture-bf082835-a2ca-4279-80e5-726f157270bd", + "capture-ce28dd53-a53d-4bc9-9956-dc3268c35e3e", + "capture-9b28544e-b867-4018-9c35-2691cef17a62", + "capture-4c4af9ea-df1a-4449-adb7-d48fce7eae93", + "capture-dabdbb5f-9eca-4afb-ad50-5b381d9dfa4f", + "capture-292e1165-0990-4d17-b6db-153c675fd66c", + "capture-d509546d-b9bb-4b3b-b82d-a65b02b2f5dc", + "capture-54d606d7-8c61-4f0a-bd5f-867bba1af3f7", + "capture-b0a7a08e-c528-4592-ba81-e6026b3f356a", + "capture-9dfaeda1-b5ff-4581-9c8b-d487fe7b9277", + "capture-b0908788-ec79-4481-b056-1fa606930f85" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [], + "advisories": [ + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-585f76f6-e841-4ef2-94df-036e711ebce8", + "capture-ee79fe32-58f7-4a71-8c15-61f2fedc0a11" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-6ca0ba27-000e-4cbd-ae25-39dc7a1c679c", + "capture-86a1823e-ea26-45a4-b410-c9ecb6040ea3" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-22890cbe-8720-408f-a3c9-fcbfe3826f2b", + "capture-86a1823e-ea26-45a4-b410-c9ecb6040ea3" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-551ab6a6-2f47-4514-ad0b-f5995ef609b2", + "capture-addb8fe4-ac6f-4c59-a6be-12d60d197a53" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-7df09f81-9c85-43ac-b69e-306d540f8afb", + "capture-42e0a99d-6cf6-4b30-8199-b430405ba25b" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b2c62684-e1ee-4d7f-b616-0ceb17a7282e", + "capture-b0a7a08e-c528-4592-ba81-e6026b3f356a" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae", + "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-663aaa9f-2bcb-4e01-937f-9d16ce860e80", + "capture-9dfaeda1-b5ff-4581-9c8b-d487fe7b9277" + ] + } + ], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "3157c77c0d581ebb", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 28, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 3157c77c0d581ebb (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 28 node(s) from 82 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam is open: the expert answered \"unknown-to-user\", pointing at rate of filler jams not yet asked or given; that is not a value.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:tint-to-white washdown.\n- … and 16 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n19 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + } + ], + "signals": [ + { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "excerpt": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nWould you want the model to be able to settle that hunch — i.e. to show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actuall…" + } + ], + "toolErrors": [], + "pendingQuestion": "Take that Meridian white on Line 2. From the moment it starts mixing to the moment the last pack comes off the filler — what's a typical run? And because runs vary: one run in ten goes worse than what, and one in ten better than what? Then tell me whether those figures change if it's Line 1 instead, or if it's a tint rather than a white.", + "completion": { + "captures": 82, + "complete": false, + "unsatisfied": 28, + "outsideSlice": 19, + "unmapped": 0, + "revision": "3157c77c0d581ebb", + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 3157c77c0d581ebb (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 28 node(s) from 82 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam is open: the expert answered \"unknown-to-user\", pointing at rate of filler jams not yet asked or given; that is not a value.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:tint-to-white washdown.\n- … and 16 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n19 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + }, + "expert": { + "content": "Right, so a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size. That includes fill-up time getting the line running plus the actual throughput.\n\nBad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours, and that's usually not the run itself slowing down, that's more \"the filler hiccupped twice\" or QA-adjacent stuff creeping in, though I'm folding some of that in loosely. Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.\n\nOn Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten. That's the \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.\n\nTints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap. I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them." + } + }, + { + "turn": 7, + "text": [ + "One thing you said gives me pause, and I'd rather sort it now than bake it in wrong." + ], + "asks": [ + { + "question": "You said the bad-day twelve-to-thirteen hours is \"usually not the run itself slowing down\" but \"the filler hiccupped twice,\" and that you're folding that in loosely. If I model filler jams as their own separate event with their own rate and repair time — which I need to do for the switch-or-wait question — then that twelve-to-thirteen would be counting jams twice. So: if you strip the hiccups out and imagine a run where nothing breaks, what does the bad-day-in-ten look like then? Or is a clean run just never much worse than the eight or nine?", + "toolCallId": "toolu_016Sy8K81vYAJqTRfxPP8zou" + } + ], + "sweeps": [ + { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-d079be7f-20b9-4bb6-85e8-6ed631cb8057", + "capture-9d5063d7-b9fb-400e-8b54-f618c6fde20e", + "capture-3245b29a-3687-4313-97c5-e0455e5889ba", + "capture-225430d9-ae4d-4ef7-b439-6f9b1ccd50c5", + "capture-770314e5-f47a-463e-908a-1d8c23ee60f5", + "capture-6ff1c59a-0664-487b-a946-2680043419a2", + "capture-be0c3675-ae93-41c5-9eaa-7d36d84617cb", + "capture-3e2a5a8a-bd99-4642-afcf-f9d3dfe2e9f6", + "capture-e9bb0ea0-9052-4006-96ad-c166a1d3a957", + "capture-27ee0ed5-50d0-47f6-94b8-77e090bca50f", + "capture-f8e69ae7-6d72-4e37-9b53-b67b47115db5", + "capture-2a491098-b602-4b46-bbaa-439e291027db", + "capture-c4aefe40-a022-4990-96a1-b74243850715", + "capture-76c7250e-6575-4e31-b667-113f3a497cce", + "capture-7da94524-13b5-4c11-a1b4-9cb1b0f07e19", + "capture-c8f57cec-d8f5-42c0-9b99-29a1a71eab73", + "capture-d6985d8d-f85e-4556-a091-df64be080ba6", + "capture-97bc8f2b-2070-4c8a-8af4-7233caeef498", + "capture-04a6f876-12f4-4f53-b6f2-f8e5fa9c87bc", + "capture-592b83e0-ece3-4e98-aedf-cdf70c202e96", + "capture-32fe7be9-75c7-464c-87cb-ca38fef4039b", + "capture-31556043-9787-40dc-8c0d-b74a47ed3589", + "capture-1f732daa-9626-420c-980f-5c2b88d9bff3", + "capture-2afae8eb-1155-4b07-9842-971df47a6a7d", + "capture-d2d6e303-2f63-478a-ace1-0bf61abbfddd", + "capture-5548a18b-9f79-4475-a9ab-83a74c750721", + "capture-1ee7c206-0c56-4d6b-b091-5861f9c40438", + "capture-4b706f60-c02f-4973-aa58-2d3ded113c39", + "capture-97ea5a05-d89c-4a7d-a136-f90526beaa27", + "capture-6d66bc49-da1a-49e3-8d98-e5d732b6e4bb", + "capture-46d37104-fb87-4105-95d5-4448aade81ac", + "capture-0cdda695-1dfa-43ef-971c-b9db09403a07" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [], + "advisories": [ + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a6ad400e-463a-4e08-80e5-1b5448355f62", + "capture-d079be7f-20b9-4bb6-85e8-6ed631cb8057" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a0a0bd7a-32fe-47e3-a2f4-8a452fe769bc", + "capture-d079be7f-20b9-4bb6-85e8-6ed631cb8057" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-cbe1db57-3beb-4e48-9ef4-d81d638fa94a", + "capture-2a491098-b602-4b46-bbaa-439e291027db" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-585f76f6-e841-4ef2-94df-036e711ebce8", + "capture-2afae8eb-1155-4b07-9842-971df47a6a7d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c74bc46d-649f-4e44-a48d-3a005dc44a7e", + "capture-e9bb0ea0-9052-4006-96ad-c166a1d3a957" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-663aaa9f-2bcb-4e01-937f-9d16ce860e80", + "capture-46d37104-fb87-4105-95d5-4448aade81ac" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee79fe32-58f7-4a71-8c15-61f2fedc0a11", + "capture-2afae8eb-1155-4b07-9842-971df47a6a7d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-0f6aea65-d3a4-430b-b532-4f1100303f9e", + "capture-31556043-9787-40dc-8c0d-b74a47ed3589" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-67de2e75-132c-43a7-b64e-412343204931", + "capture-d2d6e303-2f63-478a-ace1-0bf61abbfddd" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-54d606d7-8c61-4f0a-bd5f-867bba1af3f7", + "capture-4b706f60-c02f-4973-aa58-2d3ded113c39" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-9dfaeda1-b5ff-4581-9c8b-d487fe7b9277", + "capture-46d37104-fb87-4105-95d5-4448aade81ac" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b0908788-ec79-4481-b056-1fa606930f85", + "capture-6d66bc49-da1a-49e3-8d98-e5d732b6e4bb" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-6ff1c59a-0664-487b-a946-2680043419a2", + "capture-76c7250e-6575-4e31-b667-113f3a497cce" + ] + } + ], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "2e4f73ea071077f9", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 9, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 2e4f73ea071077f9 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 36 node(s) from 114 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:where Line 1 loses its time has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" has not been addressed on objective:where Line 1 loses its time.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:which option actually loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" on objective:which option actually loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:which option loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" on objective:which option loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P08 on objective:where Line 1 loses its time: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n\n33 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + } + ], + "signals": [ + { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "excerpt": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nTake that Meridian white on Line 2. From the moment it starts mixing to the moment the last pack comes off the filler — what's a typical …" + } + ], + "toolErrors": [], + "pendingQuestion": "You said the bad-day twelve-to-thirteen hours is \"usually not the run itself slowing down\" but \"the filler hiccupped twice,\" and that you're folding that in loosely. If I model filler jams as their own separate event with their own rate and repair time — which I need to do for the switch-or-wait question — then that twelve-to-thirteen would be counting jams twice. So: if you strip the hiccups out and imagine a run where nothing breaks, what does the bad-day-in-ten look like then? Or is a clean run just never much worse than the eight or nine?", + "completion": { + "captures": 114, + "complete": false, + "unsatisfied": 9, + "outsideSlice": 33, + "unmapped": 0, + "revision": "2e4f73ea071077f9", + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 2e4f73ea071077f9 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 36 node(s) from 114 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:where Line 1 loses its time has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" has not been addressed on objective:where Line 1 loses its time.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:which option actually loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" on objective:which option actually loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:which option loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" on objective:which option loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P08 on objective:where Line 1 loses its time: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n\n33 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + }, + "expert": { + "content": "That's fair, and yeah, I was sloppy folding them together. If nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup, nothing — a clean run doesn't really vary that much from typical. Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number.\n\nThe twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup. So you're right to pull that apart: clean-run variability is small, and the big bad days are really the breakdown showing up inside the run, not the run itself being slow." + } + }, + { + "turn": 8, + "text": [ + "Two housekeeping things I want to settle, because right now the model has plenty of plant detail but the two questions it's meant to answer aren't yet wired to any of it." + ], + "asks": [ + { + "question": "If the tool had a box where you typed the question, how would you write the two of them — the disruption one and the Line 1 one — in one sentence each, as you'd actually phrase them? And for each, name the things about the plant the answer hangs on: for the disruption one I'd guess it's the lines, the run times, the washdown, the jam and the due dates — tell me what I'm missing or what doesn't belong.", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01EHPQiwUUuqA7BA9xjbGyvx" + } + ], + "sweeps": [ + { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-a5926e2a-88e8-459e-a296-282b16d499a8", + "capture-ea1779b0-9a83-42aa-92d1-746e73de43cc", + "capture-1288a3df-c7fd-4319-8d4e-a228572ba0b0", + "capture-4be8c533-88e3-4f97-bcef-9b445cfeb3e6", + "capture-bb291ebf-9fe0-4a6e-9840-e7d7fac44033", + "capture-edfaf81c-c276-4b57-a88c-914953b1c6be", + "capture-13339551-ff3a-414f-8260-e1296530d8ec", + "capture-535749ea-ba99-4d11-84c0-8203fd058329", + "capture-79eccb7f-a787-40d4-a2fa-e95bfda82d18", + "capture-3c6b3e85-7fd3-4831-9201-6e3ef525e7cf", + "capture-f1eca8a3-a2c2-4d92-a428-763c67e7b02a", + "capture-823c9593-db42-45eb-9515-937e6b90bd33", + "capture-f7e12936-7567-4b38-be19-a45fb5dc6274", + "capture-c27fb36e-eb7f-42be-b6ef-c5dd9e9283e2", + "capture-5755b52c-e250-4fae-9c9b-ac6eba42d092", + "capture-afd366c9-1ea6-4b73-b2c0-ed97c9af0c79", + "capture-86fd1cfb-379b-42f7-bdbb-8586dae7f755", + "capture-90d36431-4341-4f9e-8bf6-8b5354b2fedd", + "capture-7ef3368b-e678-4c58-b7f9-137d1607d8ec", + "capture-10d88b79-af70-4a14-90c1-da56ad526d36", + "capture-921611c3-21b5-4ab2-8e56-9b8cdaa2eba2", + "capture-6cf8c229-ab84-4448-abc6-3e7f4a76bb4c", + "capture-ce789325-dd40-4b21-a936-73485ccb90b9", + "capture-1ba32034-be19-432b-a012-326b682fd357", + "capture-526685d5-3021-40f4-8cb9-a4e8d92002b7", + "capture-35f88f0f-1e4e-44a3-9d47-33c6942a9b16", + "capture-e28ed067-b6a4-40d8-935a-3598e2401cc1", + "capture-a3d8c0b7-97bf-443d-aa86-8fef8ea0bd5a", + "capture-4e68a0cf-eccb-4b69-91f0-c7fb74a2b639", + "capture-cfe5bf57-8879-4592-a938-1527d73c8bac", + "capture-b3079749-c23b-4ade-ac51-9bbff19806fb", + "capture-e7d9cbf7-5a12-4e04-8fbf-b2b0581efa5d", + "capture-23c5706e-37c1-481e-9438-8fae70973c13", + "capture-00863ee1-f99c-48b2-b680-bf4eb71e6a57", + "capture-196b8447-3958-444f-9860-8de7330299ec" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [], + "advisories": [ + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a6ad400e-463a-4e08-80e5-1b5448355f62", + "capture-a5926e2a-88e8-459e-a296-282b16d499a8" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-3f2444d5-8001-46d9-8a92-c85f8c6f8d6a", + "capture-1288a3df-c7fd-4319-8d4e-a228572ba0b0" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b42a88f7-65b8-4f76-833d-18f39111ec49", + "capture-526685d5-3021-40f4-8cb9-a4e8d92002b7" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a0a0bd7a-32fe-47e3-a2f4-8a452fe769bc", + "capture-a5926e2a-88e8-459e-a296-282b16d499a8" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-cbe1db57-3beb-4e48-9ef4-d81d638fa94a", + "capture-5755b52c-e250-4fae-9c9b-ac6eba42d092" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-dba4ec08-0265-420c-95d2-4dce250ae0b6", + "capture-f7e12936-7567-4b38-be19-a45fb5dc6274" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-585f76f6-e841-4ef2-94df-036e711ebce8", + "capture-a3d8c0b7-97bf-443d-aa86-8fef8ea0bd5a" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b2c62684-e1ee-4d7f-b616-0ceb17a7282e", + "capture-b3079749-c23b-4ade-ac51-9bbff19806fb" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c74bc46d-649f-4e44-a48d-3a005dc44a7e", + "capture-4e68a0cf-eccb-4b69-91f0-c7fb74a2b639" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee79fe32-58f7-4a71-8c15-61f2fedc0a11", + "capture-a3d8c0b7-97bf-443d-aa86-8fef8ea0bd5a" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-d509546d-b9bb-4b3b-b82d-a65b02b2f5dc", + "capture-e7d9cbf7-5a12-4e04-8fbf-b2b0581efa5d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b0a7a08e-c528-4592-ba81-e6026b3f356a", + "capture-b3079749-c23b-4ade-ac51-9bbff19806fb" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-d079be7f-20b9-4bb6-85e8-6ed631cb8057", + "capture-a5926e2a-88e8-459e-a296-282b16d499a8" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-225430d9-ae4d-4ef7-b439-6f9b1ccd50c5", + "capture-4be8c533-88e3-4f97-bcef-9b445cfeb3e6" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e9bb0ea0-9052-4006-96ad-c166a1d3a957", + "capture-4e68a0cf-eccb-4b69-91f0-c7fb74a2b639" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-2a491098-b602-4b46-bbaa-439e291027db", + "capture-5755b52c-e250-4fae-9c9b-ac6eba42d092" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c4aefe40-a022-4990-96a1-b74243850715", + "capture-823c9593-db42-45eb-9515-937e6b90bd33" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-1f732daa-9626-420c-980f-5c2b88d9bff3", + "capture-35f88f0f-1e4e-44a3-9d47-33c6942a9b16" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-2afae8eb-1155-4b07-9842-971df47a6a7d", + "capture-a3d8c0b7-97bf-443d-aa86-8fef8ea0bd5a" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-f1eca8a3-a2c2-4d92-a428-763c67e7b02a", + "capture-c27fb36e-eb7f-42be-b6ef-c5dd9e9283e2" + ] + } + ], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "36d1240e30d0f4d1", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 9, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 36d1240e30d0f4d1 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 41 node(s) from 149 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:where Line 1 loses its time has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" has not been addressed on objective:where Line 1 loses its time.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:which option actually loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" on objective:which option actually loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:which option loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" on objective:which option loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P08 on objective:where Line 1 loses its time: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n\n38 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + } + ], + "signals": [ + { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "excerpt": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nYou said the bad-day twelve-to-thirteen hours is \"usually not the run itself slowing down\" but \"the filler hiccupped twice,\" and that you…" + } + ], + "toolErrors": [], + "pendingQuestion": "If the tool had a box where you typed the question, how would you write the two of them — the disruption one and the Line 1 one — in one sentence each, as you'd actually phrase them? And for each, name the things about the plant the answer hangs on: for the disruption one I'd guess it's the lines, the run times, the washdown, the jam and the due dates — tell me what I'm missing or what doesn't belong.", + "completion": { + "captures": 149, + "complete": false, + "unsatisfied": 9, + "outsideSlice": 38, + "unmapped": 0, + "revision": "36d1240e30d0f4d1", + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 36d1240e30d0f4d1 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 41 node(s) from 149 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:where Line 1 loses its time has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" has not been addressed on objective:where Line 1 loses its time.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:which option actually loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" on objective:which option actually loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:which option loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" on objective:which option loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P08 on objective:where Line 1 loses its time: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n\n38 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + }, + "expert": { + "content": "Alright, let me actually try and write these the way I'd type them if I had the box.\n\n**Disruption one:** \"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"\n\nWhat it hangs on: the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way). It hangs on the jam itself — how long is this repair *actually* going to take, which I never know at the time, so really it needs some sense of \"could be quick, could be long\" rather than one number. And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours. And then the knock-on: whatever gets bumped off Line 1, does it blow its own due date, and whose order was it — that's the \"who can absorb it\" judgment call again.\n\nI'd say what's missing from your list, or under-weighted: the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it, and the bumped order's identity matters, not just \"an order got delayed.\" A distributor slipping is fine, so the answer to the question genuinely depends on whose tint was sitting there.\n\n**The Line 1 tank one:** \"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\" That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have. It also probably depends on the product, since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages, so the tank might matter a lot for some products and not at all for others. That's not something I'd have said a month ago.", + "stimulus": "(Sorry — I've just seen the time, I have the floor huddle in ten minutes. How much more do you need?)" + } + }, + { + "turn": 9, + "text": [ + "Honest answer to \"how much more\": we're maybe a third of the way. What's still open, roughly in order of how much it costs you: the filler jam's rate and repair time; what the washdown actually costs including ramp scrap; the \"who can absorb a slip\" rule as you actually apply it; how orders arrive into the demand book; QA hold times; and the stage rates and tank size, which we've already agreed aren't in your head. None of that needs to happen today.\n\nFor the ten minutes, I'd spend them on the jam, because you named it as the thing you never know at the time and nobody else can tell me." + ], + "asks": [ + { + "question": "Thinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it jam badly enough to stop the run — is that a once-a-week thing, a couple of times a month, once a quarter? Give me a low and high rather than one figure. And then, separately, when it does stop: how long is a typical repair, how long is the one-in-ten bad one, and how long is the one-in-ten quick one?", + "toolCallId": "toolu_018NF8gHsprWVmC1fJGrJ3VF" + } + ], + "sweeps": [ + { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-b58883f3-43e2-4626-bc59-a9c091f1d1b5", + "capture-3aa3764b-8dd5-495a-bf3e-b32cbc89ba61", + "capture-57ad71c3-f423-4d91-a9f8-d3ce31f1fca1", + "capture-1a3325b9-15b6-436a-8e7f-feff95d98036", + "capture-0e28490a-6b4b-4996-9b6f-3d9249a7d2dc", + "capture-43c5ef42-68ce-478f-89b0-c552111d807a", + "capture-ccc2d7eb-8a3f-4684-8f1c-a21a51049550", + "capture-a7cac8dd-02ea-4fc2-9b07-981ba2152a06", + "capture-a158a5da-be3a-461f-87c0-69c38cac1a72", + "capture-4c582a37-42ed-4d72-a3dd-5a15a6048a23", + "capture-4043a577-c1b4-44c3-91f3-2194def82bd9", + "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473", + "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006", + "capture-72d414e6-f6a2-420e-8407-667f41535411", + "capture-0958f3c5-59f7-4139-8942-fc5204d9d5dc", + "capture-53f9387d-f037-4d0f-999b-f89a8f113f46", + "capture-d7faeb42-3fb6-4e39-a4db-a4c0fb8430f1", + "capture-38e0effa-0fb7-48ff-907c-2fc9f3e64211", + "capture-9b796f7a-c77b-45a7-83f7-806c40aaf58f", + "capture-314d8187-81ba-478c-8f71-1c9e5826965b", + "capture-345fbb5a-c0c1-4e3a-9015-33b3ad727831", + "capture-60f6f8c8-f52e-443a-adee-6818339f3b35", + "capture-be556841-bf14-4fe0-8c23-ffc773896b2b", + "capture-26d3ac6c-4b27-4765-baa3-8437f06fe8ca", + "capture-da6d10a4-e0f2-4b1d-8e78-4d58cadeb8f2", + "capture-68f9db28-a002-406d-912a-4cc410e5b380", + "capture-0a06d184-bf72-42c4-95b3-7ad88ea4e059", + "capture-3fec05b6-fd93-4759-9598-7870f4f98d7f", + "capture-091d909a-fbcd-4630-bc2d-97bca63e4c7b", + "capture-7111ab55-5d90-44f6-a1d2-4aa1b48da4bb", + "capture-c858f8bf-b62f-41ac-8b6c-bf1ca8c5d44a", + "capture-7d24a8e1-6236-41bd-ab99-3a1036c5b993" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [], + "advisories": [ + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-551ab6a6-2f47-4514-ad0b-f5995ef609b2", + "capture-9b796f7a-c77b-45a7-83f7-806c40aaf58f" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a2938097-b902-4f24-8e15-70f4b8ce95fb", + "capture-be556841-bf14-4fe0-8c23-ffc773896b2b" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b2c62684-e1ee-4d7f-b616-0ceb17a7282e", + "capture-3fec05b6-fd93-4759-9598-7870f4f98d7f" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c74bc46d-649f-4e44-a48d-3a005dc44a7e", + "capture-a7cac8dd-02ea-4fc2-9b07-981ba2152a06" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae", + "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae", + "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c", + "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c", + "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-663aaa9f-2bcb-4e01-937f-9d16ce860e80", + "capture-c858f8bf-b62f-41ac-8b6c-bf1ca8c5d44a" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-addb8fe4-ac6f-4c59-a6be-12d60d197a53", + "capture-9b796f7a-c77b-45a7-83f7-806c40aaf58f" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-d509546d-b9bb-4b3b-b82d-a65b02b2f5dc", + "capture-091d909a-fbcd-4630-bc2d-97bca63e4c7b" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b0a7a08e-c528-4592-ba81-e6026b3f356a", + "capture-3fec05b6-fd93-4759-9598-7870f4f98d7f" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-9dfaeda1-b5ff-4581-9c8b-d487fe7b9277", + "capture-c858f8bf-b62f-41ac-8b6c-bf1ca8c5d44a" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b0908788-ec79-4481-b056-1fa606930f85", + "capture-7d24a8e1-6236-41bd-ab99-3a1036c5b993" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e9bb0ea0-9052-4006-96ad-c166a1d3a957", + "capture-a7cac8dd-02ea-4fc2-9b07-981ba2152a06" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-27ee0ed5-50d0-47f6-94b8-77e090bca50f", + "capture-a158a5da-be3a-461f-87c0-69c38cac1a72" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-f8e69ae7-6d72-4e37-9b53-b67b47115db5", + "capture-4c582a37-42ed-4d72-a3dd-5a15a6048a23" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c4aefe40-a022-4990-96a1-b74243850715", + "capture-4043a577-c1b4-44c3-91f3-2194def82bd9" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-97bc8f2b-2070-4c8a-8af4-7233caeef498", + "capture-0958f3c5-59f7-4139-8942-fc5204d9d5dc" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-1f732daa-9626-420c-980f-5c2b88d9bff3", + "capture-d7faeb42-3fb6-4e39-a4db-a4c0fb8430f1" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-6d66bc49-da1a-49e3-8d98-e5d732b6e4bb", + "capture-7d24a8e1-6236-41bd-ab99-3a1036c5b993" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-46d37104-fb87-4105-95d5-4448aade81ac", + "capture-c858f8bf-b62f-41ac-8b6c-bf1ca8c5d44a" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-823c9593-db42-45eb-9515-937e6b90bd33", + "capture-4043a577-c1b4-44c3-91f3-2194def82bd9" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-35f88f0f-1e4e-44a3-9d47-33c6942a9b16", + "capture-d7faeb42-3fb6-4e39-a4db-a4c0fb8430f1" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4e68a0cf-eccb-4b69-91f0-c7fb74a2b639", + "capture-a7cac8dd-02ea-4fc2-9b07-981ba2152a06" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b3079749-c23b-4ade-ac51-9bbff19806fb", + "capture-3fec05b6-fd93-4759-9598-7870f4f98d7f" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e7d9cbf7-5a12-4e04-8fbf-b2b0581efa5d", + "capture-091d909a-fbcd-4630-bc2d-97bca63e4c7b" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473", + "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006" + ] + } + ], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "1dffca1f0e4725ec", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 42, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 1dffca1f0e4725ec (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 47 node(s) from 181 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- … and 30 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n34 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + } + ], + "signals": [ + { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "excerpt": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nIf the tool had a box where you typed the question, how would you write the two of them — the disruption one and the Line 1 one — in one …" + } + ], + "toolErrors": [], + "pendingQuestion": "Thinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it jam badly enough to stop the run — is that a once-a-week thing, a couple of times a month, once a quarter? Give me a low and high rather than one figure. And then, separately, when it does stop: how long is a typical repair, how long is the one-in-ten bad one, and how long is the one-in-ten quick one?", + "completion": { + "captures": 181, + "complete": false, + "unsatisfied": 42, + "outsideSlice": 34, + "unmapped": 0, + "revision": "1dffca1f0e4725ec", + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 1dffca1f0e4725ec (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 47 node(s) from 181 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- … and 30 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n34 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + }, + "expert": { + "content": "Okay, quick version. It's a \"every week or two\" thing — low end maybe once every three weeks if we're lucky, high end twice a week if it's being temperamental. It's not seasonal or anything I can point to, it just runs a streak of bad weeks sometimes.\n\nWhen it stops: typical repair is call it thirty to forty-five minutes — tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again. Quick one-in-ten is more like ten, fifteen minutes, basically a false alarm. The bad one-in-ten is the one that scares me — that's when it's not just a jam but something's actually broken in the filler head, and that can run four, five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift. I don't have a cleaner breakdown than that — maintenance would have the actual work-order times in the CMMS but I've never pulled them.\n\nRight, I need to run — good session though. Same time next week?" + } + }, + { + "turn": 10, + "text": [ + "That bounce was my own phrase, not yours — \"jams badly enough to stop the run\" was my wording. Re-anchoring on what you actually said.", + "Go — and yes, same time next week works. Here's where we got to, so you can correct anything when you're back at a desk. **The model is not finished and I'm not going to pretend it is; I wouldn't hand this to your tooling yet.**\n\n## What's on record, in your words\n\n**The two questions the model exists to answer**\n1. \"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"\n2. \"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\"\n\n**What \"better\" means** — Meridian-style on-time is a hard line, \"not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross.\" Below that line you weigh washdown hours, whether the bumped order slides and by how much, and who the customer is. No formula; judgment on who can absorb the slip.\n\n**The flow** — demand book line item out of ERP → you allocate to a line and a week slot → mix, mill, tint, fill (tint \"barely there\" for a white) → QA hold → release, warehouse, ship against due date.\n\n**The line, both ways** — on the sheet, one row, one order occupies Line 2 mix-to-fill. Physically, separate kit with small holding tanks between, and the crew will start the next mix if there's tank room. Both recorded; neither averaged away.\n\n**Run times, clean of breakdowns** — white on Line 2: typical 8–9 h, bad-but-clean 9–10 h, good day ~6 h. Same order on Line 1: add 50–60%, so typical 13–14 h, best ~10 h. Tints: 8–10 h typical on *either* line, no big gap — which you flagged as unexplained and sheet-derived. The 12–13 h figure has been pulled out as breakdown, not run.\n\n**Filler jam** — every week or two; low once in three weeks, high twice a week. Repair typical 30–45 min, quick one-in-ten 10–15 min, bad one-in-ten 4–5 h, \"occasionally eating the rest of the shift.\"\n\n**Washdown** — tint-to-white, three hours, direction matters, plus ramp scrap you don't have numbers for.\n\n## Gaps, with where they'd come from\n- Stage-level rates per line — historian, never pulled apart.\n- Tank sizes, mill-to-fill on Line 1 — engineering drawings.\n- Jam repair times, properly — maintenance work orders in the CMMS.\n- Ramp scrap after washdown — you said it shouldn't be ignored; no source named yet.\n- Whether the tank matters differently by SKU — your own new thought, unexamined.\n- QA hold: \"a few hours for a white,\" and a longer \"specialty wait\" you mentioned but I never asked about.\n- How orders arrive into the demand book — never asked.\n- The \"who can absorb the slip\" rule — I have distributor-shrugs and prickly-account, not a rule I could apply without you.\n\n## Assumptions ledger\n1. That the four stages are the same four for every product — you said \"same four stages every product goes through,\" so this is yours, not mine, but it's load-bearing enough to re-check.\n2. Nothing else. Where I was tempted to fill in — jam rate before you gave it, washdown scrap, stage rates — it's in the gaps list instead.\n\nBoth objectives are still formally unsupported: I have the plant detail and the questions, but haven't yet wired which pieces each answer depends on tightly enough for the tooling. That plus the ramp scrap and the slip rule are what I'd open with next week." + ], + "asks": [], + "sweeps": [ + { + "status": "refused", + "refusal": { + "code": "evidence-quote-not-found", + "excerpt": "jams badly enough to stop the run", + "message": "No user entry contains the verbatim quote \"jams badly enough to stop the run\". Repair the quote to match the user's words exactly." + } + }, + { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-1a240192-8179-4339-815e-3775a062e986", + "capture-85062afa-e82d-46ce-b609-f7ed16f8b093", + "capture-2c3fa15f-551b-4380-a3b3-8dbc6334a9bb", + "capture-41269bfb-9040-4d54-a113-a94c09f6f2f0", + "capture-f7ea7c88-4d40-48e7-84e5-2b12ebc5ea8e", + "capture-dcb22f82-5927-447e-a35a-4ff18d16ce26", + "capture-0e8d50b2-4222-4129-a619-09c5612c05c5", + "capture-117f9832-aaba-473a-9411-6fd4022388f2", + "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c", + "capture-875ed21b-d257-48fe-867b-6785abf6abb7", + "capture-06d48b41-86fb-48c0-b3e0-59012ba81960", + "capture-428e3931-676d-4af5-a30c-d7a31ea0d8ad", + "capture-ecd3c093-8f6b-4a48-a1fc-d2775d4dbc1f", + "capture-c6339dee-036e-47cb-9dcf-42fc22d38aae", + "capture-2bc071c4-2919-4ff3-910a-92d872eeaef2", + "capture-6ec49aac-c165-4e2b-a937-bed3c8c51c2c", + "capture-c3f03d77-6760-4b3b-99e5-b78d119a352f", + "capture-4cdad6ac-6cd9-46d4-b3ea-62401019ae14", + "capture-83e1381a-f2df-4713-a2f6-f11d034c2fd4", + "capture-95cbfe20-605f-4218-9076-0f4816ebadfa", + "capture-1a5a8343-7367-416e-b760-c7e8f587fe25", + "capture-bf2e57a3-bda7-4090-92ca-af63e0c7a248", + "capture-aec8ff27-3e3f-45d2-9142-b6dc2b5d88a3", + "capture-9d59a385-a8ae-410a-a13d-a4bca3dde9a3", + "capture-4b22a066-a97c-4329-8513-cbd85edd8d65", + "capture-63fabb67-24c4-4bee-926f-17917300c8f4", + "capture-b1e5ded4-79d6-4ff4-bd0d-6386509efba9", + "capture-147c2765-6bfb-4da0-9df9-b74a1c1049de", + "capture-ec5740e7-5068-4222-ad24-8396f5975657", + "capture-2884cc84-c616-4227-860a-d6b55a06c13d", + "capture-0548a680-8da8-47e9-ad72-fb1e264fac80", + "capture-8c6a716b-e09a-4977-94d9-f28ab74be7c4", + "capture-a67683fd-0f34-4838-b48e-aa01f657a511", + "capture-1b632a29-f1de-48e5-8f96-a5ef908c4a56", + "capture-9926552e-289f-4b4a-bc99-4cae34f1720a", + "capture-06aac0a9-b270-4b13-a54f-37440769d685", + "capture-94948329-18e7-42fe-9538-a84fd72c225d", + "capture-16b9c643-8b17-490e-bfe0-022a06efd914", + "capture-5ae45290-5d13-4f2b-b24b-82c66d3d48af", + "capture-821e00ef-6923-43b0-955b-3ed7d60ce127", + "capture-6da3fa16-460b-4f07-aefc-f941d7118f76", + "capture-731a5768-edc7-4858-ad42-50d2faf4b181", + "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026", + "capture-07cb7ca9-27c5-4395-bc9e-aaebc5811382", + "capture-882fa9a2-3a16-46df-90b7-d5ab8ee1dce2", + "capture-b6c2c920-801d-4858-b2c7-64c13ebfc5b1", + "capture-a0429a34-1145-458d-bada-32d827d68959" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [], + "advisories": [ + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-0b2046b4-55c8-4ce3-abac-296d6abe469d", + "capture-95cbfe20-605f-4218-9076-0f4816ebadfa" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-07de77cc-9de8-41e9-92f6-8fe06a6263c9", + "capture-16b9c643-8b17-490e-bfe0-022a06efd914" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-551ab6a6-2f47-4514-ad0b-f5995ef609b2", + "capture-5ae45290-5d13-4f2b-b24b-82c66d3d48af" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e0f39723-a7e5-4656-a8fb-0e2b50bb82da", + "capture-a67683fd-0f34-4838-b48e-aa01f657a511" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b2c62684-e1ee-4d7f-b616-0ceb17a7282e", + "capture-821e00ef-6923-43b0-955b-3ed7d60ce127" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c74bc46d-649f-4e44-a48d-3a005dc44a7e", + "capture-4cdad6ac-6cd9-46d4-b3ea-62401019ae14" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-dd037a1c-63c0-47b8-8886-81c6d1f70226", + "capture-ecd3c093-8f6b-4a48-a1fc-d2775d4dbc1f" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae", + "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae", + "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c", + "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c", + "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-663aaa9f-2bcb-4e01-937f-9d16ce860e80", + "capture-882fa9a2-3a16-46df-90b7-d5ab8ee1dce2" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-addb8fe4-ac6f-4c59-a6be-12d60d197a53", + "capture-5ae45290-5d13-4f2b-b24b-82c66d3d48af" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-bf082835-a2ca-4279-80e5-726f157270bd", + "capture-6ec49aac-c165-4e2b-a937-bed3c8c51c2c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-d509546d-b9bb-4b3b-b82d-a65b02b2f5dc", + "capture-6da3fa16-460b-4f07-aefc-f941d7118f76" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b0a7a08e-c528-4592-ba81-e6026b3f356a", + "capture-821e00ef-6923-43b0-955b-3ed7d60ce127" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-9dfaeda1-b5ff-4581-9c8b-d487fe7b9277", + "capture-882fa9a2-3a16-46df-90b7-d5ab8ee1dce2" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b0908788-ec79-4481-b056-1fa606930f85", + "capture-b6c2c920-801d-4858-b2c7-64c13ebfc5b1" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-225430d9-ae4d-4ef7-b439-6f9b1ccd50c5", + "capture-dcb22f82-5927-447e-a35a-4ff18d16ce26" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e9bb0ea0-9052-4006-96ad-c166a1d3a957", + "capture-4cdad6ac-6cd9-46d4-b3ea-62401019ae14" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c8f57cec-d8f5-42c0-9b99-29a1a71eab73", + "capture-1a5a8343-7367-416e-b760-c7e8f587fe25" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-97bc8f2b-2070-4c8a-8af4-7233caeef498", + "capture-4b22a066-a97c-4329-8513-cbd85edd8d65" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-1f732daa-9626-420c-980f-5c2b88d9bff3", + "capture-94948329-18e7-42fe-9538-a84fd72c225d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-5548a18b-9f79-4475-a9ab-83a74c750721", + "capture-147c2765-6bfb-4da0-9df9-b74a1c1049de" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-6d66bc49-da1a-49e3-8d98-e5d732b6e4bb", + "capture-b6c2c920-801d-4858-b2c7-64c13ebfc5b1" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-46d37104-fb87-4105-95d5-4448aade81ac", + "capture-882fa9a2-3a16-46df-90b7-d5ab8ee1dce2" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4be8c533-88e3-4f97-bcef-9b445cfeb3e6", + "capture-dcb22f82-5927-447e-a35a-4ff18d16ce26" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-35f88f0f-1e4e-44a3-9d47-33c6942a9b16", + "capture-94948329-18e7-42fe-9538-a84fd72c225d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4e68a0cf-eccb-4b69-91f0-c7fb74a2b639", + "capture-4cdad6ac-6cd9-46d4-b3ea-62401019ae14" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b3079749-c23b-4ade-ac51-9bbff19806fb", + "capture-821e00ef-6923-43b0-955b-3ed7d60ce127" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e7d9cbf7-5a12-4e04-8fbf-b2b0581efa5d", + "capture-6da3fa16-460b-4f07-aefc-f941d7118f76" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a7cac8dd-02ea-4fc2-9b07-981ba2152a06", + "capture-4cdad6ac-6cd9-46d4-b3ea-62401019ae14" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473", + "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473", + "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006", + "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006", + "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-0958f3c5-59f7-4139-8942-fc5204d9d5dc", + "capture-4b22a066-a97c-4329-8513-cbd85edd8d65" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-d7faeb42-3fb6-4e39-a4db-a4c0fb8430f1", + "capture-94948329-18e7-42fe-9538-a84fd72c225d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-9b796f7a-c77b-45a7-83f7-806c40aaf58f", + "capture-5ae45290-5d13-4f2b-b24b-82c66d3d48af" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-3fec05b6-fd93-4759-9598-7870f4f98d7f", + "capture-821e00ef-6923-43b0-955b-3ed7d60ce127" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-091d909a-fbcd-4630-bc2d-97bca63e4c7b", + "capture-6da3fa16-460b-4f07-aefc-f941d7118f76" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c858f8bf-b62f-41ac-8b6c-bf1ca8c5d44a", + "capture-882fa9a2-3a16-46df-90b7-d5ab8ee1dce2" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-7d24a8e1-6236-41bd-ab99-3a1036c5b993", + "capture-b6c2c920-801d-4858-b2c7-64c13ebfc5b1" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c", + "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026" + ] + } + ], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "0028ff75065b59b1", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 44, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 0028ff75065b59b1 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 56 node(s) from 228 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"who or what performs it\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- … and 32 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n41 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + } + ], + "signals": [ + { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "excerpt": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nThinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it jam badly enough to stop the run — is that a once-a-week thing, a c…" + } + ], + "toolErrors": [], + "completion": { + "captures": 228, + "complete": false, + "unsatisfied": 44, + "outsideSlice": 41, + "unmapped": 0, + "revision": "0028ff75065b59b1", + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 0028ff75065b59b1 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 56 node(s) from 228 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"who or what performs it\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- … and 32 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n41 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + }, + "expert": { + "content": "Looks right — that's a fair record, and yeah, next week let's start with ramp scrap and the slip rule, since those feel like the ones I could actually go dig up or nail down between now and then. I'll ask maintenance for the CMMS numbers on the filler too while I'm at it. Go on, get to your huddle — wait, that's me. See you next week." + } + }, + { + "turn": 11, + "text": [ + "Enjoy the huddle.\n\nThree things I'll have ready for next week, so you don't have to hold them:\n\n1. **Ramp scrap and the slip rule** first, as you asked — for the slip rule I'll come at it through a case rather than a principle, so have in mind the last time you bumped someone's order and it turned out to be the wrong someone.\n2. **CMMS filler numbers** — when you get them, what I want is the same shape you gave me from memory: typical, bad one-in-ten, quick one-in-ten. If the work orders disagree with your 30–45 minutes, that disagreement is worth more to the model than either figure alone, so don't reconcile it before you bring it.\n3. **The tint parity puzzle** — that Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed with no explanation. It's the loose thread most likely to be the same thing as your tank hunch, and I'd like to pull on it once the scrap and slip rule are in.\n\nNothing needs doing beyond that. See you next week.", + "The tail has settled: the read-back was confirmed, the session closed, and the expert's last message adds content in their own words — what they'll dig up before next time and that they'll pull the CMMS numbers from maintenance. That belongs in the record as deferral deposits, not as agreement to my summary.\n\nOne caution I'll carry into the sweep: \"Looks right\" is assent to my phrasing, not origination. It closes nothing that wasn't already sourced to their words.", + "Swept and folded — the session's record is durable. Since you've gone, this is a note-to-self for next week rather than anything you need to read now.\n\n**State of the model:** 69 nodes from 267 captures. Not complete, and two things about *how it's held* need fixing before more content goes in:\n\n1. **Objective duplication.** Your two questions have landed as five objective nodes — successive rephrasings of the same two (\"which option loses less\", \"which option actually loses less\", \"wait or shift when Line 2 goes down\" are one question; \"where Line 1 loses its time\" and \"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\" are the other). That's an artefact of my asking you to restate them, not a fact about your plant. Consolidating is a review-and-revise job, and it needs your word on which phrasing is yours, not my merge.\n\n2. **Nothing is wired to the objectives.** 53 of the 69 nodes sit outside every objective's dependency slice — recorded, but not demanded by anything. That's why the completion report keeps growing without the model getting more answerable. You *did* tell me what the disruption question hangs on: the run being protected, Line 1's state and family, the jam duration, the ramp scrap, and the bumped order's identity. I have those as prose in your answer; they aren't yet linked as dependencies. Doing that link properly is the first thing that makes any of the plant detail count.\n\n3. **Three open conflicts** on the filler jam node and the production-run node, where later answers superseded earlier ones — the 12–13 h that turned out to be breakdown, and the two jam descriptions. Those need your explicit word to close, not my inference about which you meant.\n\nSo next week's order: ramp scrap and the slip rule as you asked, then the objective wiring, then the conflict closes. The tint parity thread stays third." + ], + "asks": [], + "sweeps": [ + { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-48033ee8-f7eb-4615-b21f-018837fc9c5e", + "capture-88da9925-d922-48c3-8ea0-2c631df3ae3d", + "capture-f53d8f62-375e-4af6-9aaa-fb903839993c", + "capture-ac435640-eea2-4ad6-9695-8e5408b4d852", + "capture-f5a658db-c8ec-4ca0-8a87-3ad252dee56d", + "capture-618842bb-d23d-4371-ae57-73e5257ba215", + "capture-538fb022-2495-46bb-8661-8e1f38c802bf", + "capture-ec8c16b7-d4c0-46fa-a64d-63a23fa37b98", + "capture-5d5f862f-c18c-4501-b544-76735d28e004", + "capture-7f6b8be1-6336-465f-8e11-36a5277d51bd", + "capture-1a83c9c6-a8f8-4ece-a5d4-53b81bf8cc9b", + "capture-e6ae51ed-e1f6-45f3-aab1-c4bca2a979e8", + "capture-c2d2a972-d139-43a7-80c2-50108d92f7a7", + "capture-6c277c9b-2362-4158-8a3b-e069ff0c9a01", + "capture-7f9ac97e-375b-4de3-bbcd-b65e5c7427a6", + "capture-66fbb371-91b7-41db-b437-5bd207d08aed", + "capture-8da19d62-c082-41f6-ac55-f28afe266a8c", + "capture-995374a1-2d25-4690-8397-b342f46ebf02", + "capture-3cc84392-4ed4-4804-8a7c-db07d384a8b2", + "capture-289ac648-e939-4e62-ad46-a17b112402d4", + "capture-5376c084-3889-476f-adab-b09a038ded28", + "capture-b9dfddf9-52d8-433e-81b8-5611e7356c34", + "capture-27ae8fdf-c227-4160-a1a5-e85530156938", + "capture-7bd393bf-3f05-4aa1-b15a-968c293b076f", + "capture-ef41e72f-3126-4003-82b2-686b5f8bfdfb", + "capture-4fa34ba3-82e3-4a4a-ad28-362765a40046", + "capture-2f670377-be1e-4275-9e46-24dd13316300", + "capture-9dc62989-7db7-4e58-baf1-b9ed0400d9a2", + "capture-b92eccd9-e2ad-41a9-abce-bb1cf8b3c328", + "capture-55e95600-febe-4c98-8859-a56eb23ab156", + "capture-29c03a62-4be2-4dc2-852e-bfeab6770f1b", + "capture-9f708103-e43a-4766-bca4-cb3b7060fdcd", + "capture-fdecb081-5b4a-4c7b-b11d-e0d780df210c", + "capture-c9379f74-4d1e-41c6-b1bf-a53c9d8fb64d", + "capture-12e575e7-b7a9-472d-b165-308334ae7513", + "capture-bc9d210e-beb9-4f7a-aa5d-243950605a2a", + "capture-90a38599-7f1b-46ed-9352-d3dd3566b338", + "capture-d889a88e-b7be-4055-9da1-e64f9fc858b0", + "capture-173c6d39-090f-49a7-9e38-c8998003718b" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [ + "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"\\\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"\\\\\\\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + ], + "advisories": [ + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-76159984-4b11-446f-a707-bc8302ef0b1d", + "capture-f53d8f62-375e-4af6-9aaa-fb903839993c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b42a88f7-65b8-4f76-833d-18f39111ec49", + "capture-55e95600-febe-4c98-8859-a56eb23ab156" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-caeeeb12-a91f-46a0-88c2-a622d4d30c55", + "capture-90a38599-7f1b-46ed-9352-d3dd3566b338" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-cbe1db57-3beb-4e48-9ef4-d81d638fa94a", + "capture-c2d2a972-d139-43a7-80c2-50108d92f7a7" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-585f76f6-e841-4ef2-94df-036e711ebce8", + "capture-12e575e7-b7a9-472d-b165-308334ae7513" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-551ab6a6-2f47-4514-ad0b-f5995ef609b2", + "capture-fdecb081-5b4a-4c7b-b11d-e0d780df210c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c74bc46d-649f-4e44-a48d-3a005dc44a7e", + "capture-6c277c9b-2362-4158-8a3b-e069ff0c9a01" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee79fe32-58f7-4a71-8c15-61f2fedc0a11", + "capture-12e575e7-b7a9-472d-b165-308334ae7513" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-addb8fe4-ac6f-4c59-a6be-12d60d197a53", + "capture-fdecb081-5b4a-4c7b-b11d-e0d780df210c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-3e2a5a8a-bd99-4642-afcf-f9d3dfe2e9f6", + "capture-1a83c9c6-a8f8-4ece-a5d4-53b81bf8cc9b" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e9bb0ea0-9052-4006-96ad-c166a1d3a957", + "capture-6c277c9b-2362-4158-8a3b-e069ff0c9a01" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-f8e69ae7-6d72-4e37-9b53-b67b47115db5", + "capture-66fbb371-91b7-41db-b437-5bd207d08aed" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-2a491098-b602-4b46-bbaa-439e291027db", + "capture-c2d2a972-d139-43a7-80c2-50108d92f7a7" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c4aefe40-a022-4990-96a1-b74243850715", + "capture-8da19d62-c082-41f6-ac55-f28afe266a8c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c8f57cec-d8f5-42c0-9b99-29a1a71eab73", + "capture-5376c084-3889-476f-adab-b09a038ded28" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-97bc8f2b-2070-4c8a-8af4-7233caeef498", + "capture-27ae8fdf-c227-4160-a1a5-e85530156938" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-1f732daa-9626-420c-980f-5c2b88d9bff3", + "capture-c9379f74-4d1e-41c6-b1bf-a53c9d8fb64d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-2afae8eb-1155-4b07-9842-971df47a6a7d", + "capture-12e575e7-b7a9-472d-b165-308334ae7513" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-f1eca8a3-a2c2-4d92-a428-763c67e7b02a", + "capture-538fb022-2495-46bb-8661-8e1f38c802bf" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-f1eca8a3-a2c2-4d92-a428-763c67e7b02a", + "capture-ec8c16b7-d4c0-46fa-a64d-63a23fa37b98" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-823c9593-db42-45eb-9515-937e6b90bd33", + "capture-8da19d62-c082-41f6-ac55-f28afe266a8c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c27fb36e-eb7f-42be-b6ef-c5dd9e9283e2", + "capture-538fb022-2495-46bb-8661-8e1f38c802bf" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c27fb36e-eb7f-42be-b6ef-c5dd9e9283e2", + "capture-ec8c16b7-d4c0-46fa-a64d-63a23fa37b98" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-5755b52c-e250-4fae-9c9b-ac6eba42d092", + "capture-c2d2a972-d139-43a7-80c2-50108d92f7a7" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ce789325-dd40-4b21-a936-73485ccb90b9", + "capture-b92eccd9-e2ad-41a9-abce-bb1cf8b3c328" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-526685d5-3021-40f4-8cb9-a4e8d92002b7", + "capture-55e95600-febe-4c98-8859-a56eb23ab156" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-35f88f0f-1e4e-44a3-9d47-33c6942a9b16", + "capture-c9379f74-4d1e-41c6-b1bf-a53c9d8fb64d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a3d8c0b7-97bf-443d-aa86-8fef8ea0bd5a", + "capture-12e575e7-b7a9-472d-b165-308334ae7513" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4e68a0cf-eccb-4b69-91f0-c7fb74a2b639", + "capture-6c277c9b-2362-4158-8a3b-e069ff0c9a01" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a7cac8dd-02ea-4fc2-9b07-981ba2152a06", + "capture-6c277c9b-2362-4158-8a3b-e069ff0c9a01" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4c582a37-42ed-4d72-a3dd-5a15a6048a23", + "capture-66fbb371-91b7-41db-b437-5bd207d08aed" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4043a577-c1b4-44c3-91f3-2194def82bd9", + "capture-8da19d62-c082-41f6-ac55-f28afe266a8c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-0958f3c5-59f7-4139-8942-fc5204d9d5dc", + "capture-27ae8fdf-c227-4160-a1a5-e85530156938" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-d7faeb42-3fb6-4e39-a4db-a4c0fb8430f1", + "capture-c9379f74-4d1e-41c6-b1bf-a53c9d8fb64d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-9b796f7a-c77b-45a7-83f7-806c40aaf58f", + "capture-fdecb081-5b4a-4c7b-b11d-e0d780df210c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-1a240192-8179-4339-815e-3775a062e986", + "capture-48033ee8-f7eb-4615-b21f-018837fc9c5e" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4cdad6ac-6cd9-46d4-b3ea-62401019ae14", + "capture-6c277c9b-2362-4158-8a3b-e069ff0c9a01" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-83e1381a-f2df-4713-a2f6-f11d034c2fd4", + "capture-7f9ac97e-375b-4de3-bbcd-b65e5c7427a6" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-1a5a8343-7367-416e-b760-c7e8f587fe25", + "capture-5376c084-3889-476f-adab-b09a038ded28" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4b22a066-a97c-4329-8513-cbd85edd8d65", + "capture-27ae8fdf-c227-4160-a1a5-e85530156938" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ec5740e7-5068-4222-ad24-8396f5975657", + "capture-4fa34ba3-82e3-4a4a-ad28-362765a40046" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-0548a680-8da8-47e9-ad72-fb1e264fac80", + "capture-9dc62989-7db7-4e58-baf1-b9ed0400d9a2" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-94948329-18e7-42fe-9538-a84fd72c225d", + "capture-c9379f74-4d1e-41c6-b1bf-a53c9d8fb64d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-5ae45290-5d13-4f2b-b24b-82c66d3d48af", + "capture-fdecb081-5b4a-4c7b-b11d-e0d780df210c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-538fb022-2495-46bb-8661-8e1f38c802bf", + "capture-ec8c16b7-d4c0-46fa-a64d-63a23fa37b98" + ] + } + ], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "26a8219a17118558", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 46, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 26a8219a17118558 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 69 node(s) from 267 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:wait or shift when Line 2 goes down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- … and 34 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n53 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + } + ], + "signals": [ + { + "tagName": "settlement-check", + "excerpt": "The harness computed this unswept conversation tail:\n\n[non-user] The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nThinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it ja…" + } + ], + "toolErrors": [], + "completion": { + "captures": 267, + "complete": false, + "unsatisfied": 46, + "outsideSlice": 53, + "unmapped": 0, + "revision": "26a8219a17118558", + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 26a8219a17118558 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 69 node(s) from 267 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:wait or shift when Line 2 goes down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- … and 34 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n53 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + }, + "expert": { + "content": "*[No response — this final message is addressed to the interviewer's own note-taking process, not to Marta. Staying in character as Marta, there is nothing here that calls for a reply; she has already left for the huddle.]*" + } + }, + { + "turn": 12, + "text": [ + "Session closed. Nothing further pending on Marta's side.\n\nFinal state for the record: model at revision `26a8219a17118558` — 69 nodes, 267 active captures, not complete. Two objectives (held as five duplicate nodes), both formally unsupported. Deferrals carry deposits: CMMS for jam repair times, historian for stage rates, engineering drawings for tank sizes, Marta herself for ramp scrap and the slip rule. Assumption ledger holds one entry, flagged for re-check.\n\nI make no claim that this projects, compiles, or runs. Next session opens as review-and-revise on the objective nodes before any new elicitation.", + "Declining this one.\n\nThe range contains no expert testimony. It is my own closing turn, my own sweep-judgment note, and my own state-of-the-model note, terminated by a stage direction confirming Marta has left and is not replying. The only entry in user position is that stage direction — narration about the interview, not Marta's words about her plant.\n\nSweeping it could only do one of two things: extract nothing, or extract something from a non-expert source. The second is the failure mode I've been guarding against all session — a model element with no expert span behind it. My own summary of the model is not evidence for the model; that would be assent taken as origin, with me on both sides of it.\n\nThe substantive content in that stretch — the CMMS follow-up, the ramp-scrap and slip-rule priority, Marta's confirmation of the read-back — was already swept from her actual message at revision `26a8219a17118558`. Nothing is at risk of being lost by leaving this tail unswept.\n\nThe swept high-water mark stays where it is. The session's durable record is complete as of that revision, and next session opens as review-and-revise on the duplicated objective nodes." + ], + "asks": [], + "sweeps": [], + "signals": [ + { + "tagName": "settlement-check", + "excerpt": "The harness computed this unswept conversation tail:\n\n[assistant] Enjoy the huddle.\n\nThree things I'll have ready for next week, so you don't have to hold them:\n\n1. **Ramp scrap and the slip rule** first, as you asked — for the slip rule I'…" + } + ], + "toolErrors": [], + "completion": { + "captures": 267, + "complete": false, + "unsatisfied": 46, + "outsideSlice": 53, + "unmapped": 0, + "revision": "26a8219a17118558", + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 26a8219a17118558 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 69 node(s) from 267 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:wait or shift when Line 2 goes down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- … and 34 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n53 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + } + ], + "usage": { + "interviewer": { + "input": 74, + "output": 152204, + "cacheRead": 969818, + "cacheWrite": 132417, + "calls": 37 + }, + "expert": { + "input": 72716, + "output": 3478, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "calls": 11 + } + }, + "history": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M0X5XEJZSRCZY37FBYJZXVNB", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000699", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTBYNVhFSllRWjVaQlZXTURQS1kyUTlU", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X5XEJYQZ5ZBVWMDPKY2Q9T", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we\nschedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling\nthat runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to\nthat — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person.\n\nPlease interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X5XFMN1ZG4EFY9AVWTHV9H", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X5XEJYQZ5ZBVWMDPKY2Q9T", + "turnId": "turn_01M0X5XEKHVQGJ5X2DCYWB9WD3", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "I should start by asking about their objectives, keeping it to one question at a time.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good — that's exactly the right split: you know the plant, I'll worry about the format. Before I ask anything about how the plant is built, I want to know what the model has to be able to tell you.\n\nLet me start there.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_ask", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01VTR3FzE8Wat7pwjPW7jcyh", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "question": "When your boss says \"test scheduling decisions before making them\" — what's a decision you've actually had to make recently where you'd have wanted to try it out first? Tell me the specific one, and what you were worried would go wrong." + }, + "output": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_01VTR3FzE8Wat7pwjPW7jcyh", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "When your boss says \"test scheduling decisions before making them\" — what's a decision you've actually had to make recently where you'd have wanted to try it out first? Tell me the specific one, and what you were worried would go wrong.", + "payload": { + "question": "When your boss says \"test scheduling decisions before making them\" — what's a decision you've actually had to make recently where you'd have wanted to try it out first? Tell me the specific one, and what you were worried would go wrong." + } + }, + "durationMs": 6 + }, + { + "type": "data-affordance", + "data": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_01VTR3FzE8Wat7pwjPW7jcyh", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "When your boss says \"test scheduling decisions before making them\" — what's a decision you've actually had to make recently where you'd have wanted to try it out first? Tell me the specific one, and what you were worried would go wrong.", + "payload": { + "question": "When your boss says \"test scheduling decisions before making them\" — what's a decision you've actually had to make recently where you'd have wanted to try it out first? Tell me the specific one, and what you were worried would go wrong." + } + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTBYNVhTWFAwTUs1WUJORzkxMUMzVzFE", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X5XSXP0MK5YBNG911C3W1D", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Okay, good question. Let me think of an actual one rather than a hypothetical.\n\nA few weeks back — Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost. We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2, and I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair. Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late. If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind.\n\nI went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date. But I was sweating it, and honestly I couldn't tell you if that was the right call or I just got lucky. That's the kind of thing — I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X5XSY3F2HAFQYZSZ41RJB0", + "role": "system", + "purpose": "dispatch", + "display": "diagnostic", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X5XSXP0MK5YBNG911C3W1D", + "signal": { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "attributes": { + "affordanceId": "affordance_toolu_01VTR3FzE8Wat7pwjPW7jcyh" + } + }, + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nWhen your boss says \"test scheduling decisions before making them\" — what's a decision you've actually had to make recently where you'd have wanted to try it out first? Tell me the specific one, and what you were worried would go wrong.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X5XTSMAZ7JTGYCNBEK2AFS", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X5XSXP0MK5YBNG911C3W1D", + "turnId": "turn_01M0X5XSY9SETVXGSADDHT7KMF", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "I need to clarify what \"better\" means here—specifically what \"loses less\" actually refers to before I go further with the comparison.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "That's a very usable one — a real disruption, two options, and no way to tell afterwards whether you chose well. That \"which option loses less\" is the heart of the model.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_ask", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01RigdvzDsLRJokW4AqBW7UE", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "question": "When you say \"loses less\" — if the model had run both options for you that morning, what number or numbers would have settled it for you? Late orders? Hours of washdown? Something about the tint you'd have bumped? I want your actual scorecard, and if two things compete, how you'd trade them off." + }, + "output": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_01RigdvzDsLRJokW4AqBW7UE", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "When you say \"loses less\" — if the model had run both options for you that morning, what number or numbers would have settled it for you? Late orders? Hours of washdown? Something about the tint you'd have bumped? I want your actual scorecard, and if two things compete, how you'd trade them off.", + "payload": { + "question": "When you say \"loses less\" — if the model had run both options for you that morning, what number or numbers would have settled it for you? Late orders? Hours of washdown? Something about the tint you'd have bumped? I want your actual scorecard, and if two things compete, how you'd trade them off." + } + }, + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "data-affordance", + "data": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_01RigdvzDsLRJokW4AqBW7UE", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "When you say \"loses less\" — if the model had run both options for you that morning, what number or numbers would have settled it for you? Late orders? Hours of washdown? Something about the tint you'd have bumped? I want your actual scorecard, and if two things compete, how you'd trade them off.", + "payload": { + "question": "When you say \"loses less\" — if the model had run both options for you that morning, what number or numbers would have settled it for you? Late orders? Hours of washdown? Something about the tint you'd have bumped? I want your actual scorecard, and if two things compete, how you'd trade them off." + } + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTBYNVk4N0FTNVJaRTQyOEVWME1XNkQ0", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X5Y87AS5RZE428EV0MW6D4", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Honestly, in the moment it's simple-minded: did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through. So the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain.\n\nUnderneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window. And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer, because a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one.\n\nSo really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \"cross the line\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \"how bad is bad\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X5Y87PB790WYFN9ZTV11Y1", + "role": "system", + "purpose": "dispatch", + "display": "diagnostic", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X5Y87AS5RZE428EV0MW6D4", + "signal": { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "attributes": { + "affordanceId": "affordance_toolu_01RigdvzDsLRJokW4AqBW7UE" + } + }, + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nWhen you say \"loses less\" — if the model had run both options for you that morning, what number or numbers would have settled it for you? Late orders? Hours of washdown? Something about the tint you'd have bumped? I want your actual scorecard, and if two things compete, how you'd trade them off.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X5Y949HBAC6DHA8WYYRGCX", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X5Y87AS5RZE428EV0MW6D4", + "turnId": "turn_01M0X5Y87SSVSRH7S8TAP58QMJ", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Two turns have settled now, so it's time to sweep before moving on. I'm also noting that \"customer tier\" is an awkward entity-type attribute to revisit later, and my next step is to ask a bounded question walking through one order end to end.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_sweep", + "toolCallId": "toolu_011HZMxGrrjkdoPHynQCyKKN", + "state": "output-available", + "input": {}, + "output": { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-a6ad400e-463a-4e08-80e5-1b5448355f62", + "capture-76159984-4b11-446f-a707-bc8302ef0b1d", + "capture-3f2444d5-8001-46d9-8a92-c85f8c6f8d6a", + "capture-b42a88f7-65b8-4f76-833d-18f39111ec49", + "capture-053410a5-6574-4355-aabf-dd972f0088e1", + "capture-e86ee1d3-dbbd-4e2d-b1c0-a8ac719f0e58", + "capture-04d27279-48f8-437e-8688-14c400f3f0f1", + "capture-7d1cb932-a1d6-4e1a-86a7-984a9d53af80", + "capture-330b99df-25fc-4d38-b1f9-6f8da955b79e", + "capture-caeeeb12-a91f-46a0-88c2-a622d4d30c55", + "capture-422d7f74-a119-45d6-8261-3c71b50af7f7", + "capture-f2a03b6c-0420-48a7-85be-bdcb3536a6f7", + "capture-c9ac976a-3eef-4a77-8e29-3598b184b450", + "capture-6bc324a5-2e12-4070-8275-fdfe819923e6", + "capture-b003fc51-0ade-4721-b400-b7b68edf8c60" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [], + "advisories": [], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "3a1fa5a01b21595c", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 20, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 3a1fa5a01b21595c (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 6 node(s) from 15 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [below-minimum-count] The model has 0 ordering/flow node(s); the floor needs 1.\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [below-required-precision] \"how long it takes\" on activity:Line 2 filler jam is known as a range; the model needs spread. Smallest delta: move it from range to spread.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [inadmissible-status] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown is held under status inferred; accepted: explicit.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:tint-to-white washdown.\n- [below-required-precision] \"how long it takes\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown is known as a number; the model needs spread. Smallest delta: move it from number to spread.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" has not been addressed on activity:tint-to-white washdown.\n- [below-required-precision] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown is known as a number; the model needs range. Smallest delta: move it from number to range.\n- … and 8 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:Line 2 filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:Line 2 filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:Line 2 filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n\n1 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + }, + "durationMs": 112179 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "I'll trace through a single order from start to finish to understand the ordering, flow, and overall structure.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I've got the objective on record: which option loses less, with Meridian-style on-time as a hard line and washdown hours plus knock-on lateness as the weighing underneath. I'll come back to how you judge \"who can absorb a slip.\"\n\nNow I need the shape of the work itself.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_ask", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01BPxGhtkoW98xCiTTeNLW4a", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "question": "Take that Meridian white order specifically and walk me through its whole life on the floor — from the moment it becomes something you have to schedule, to the moment it's out the door. Just the steps in order, four or five of them is plenty; I'll dig into each one after." + }, + "output": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_01BPxGhtkoW98xCiTTeNLW4a", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "Take that Meridian white order specifically and walk me through its whole life on the floor — from the moment it becomes something you have to schedule, to the moment it's out the door. Just the steps in order, four or five of them is plenty; I'll dig into each one after.", + "payload": { + "question": "Take that Meridian white order specifically and walk me through its whole life on the floor — from the moment it becomes something you have to schedule, to the moment it's out the door. Just the steps in order, four or five of them is plenty; I'll dig into each one after." + } + }, + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "data-affordance", + "data": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_01BPxGhtkoW98xCiTTeNLW4a", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "Take that Meridian white order specifically and walk me through its whole life on the floor — from the moment it becomes something you have to schedule, to the moment it's out the door. Just the steps in order, four or five of them is plenty; I'll dig into each one after.", + "payload": { + "question": "Take that Meridian white order specifically and walk me through its whole life on the floor — from the moment it becomes something you have to schedule, to the moment it's out the door. Just the steps in order, four or five of them is plenty; I'll dig into each one after." + } + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTBYNjI2N0Q4S1QzTTVBUTlBNTA1WThT", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6267D8KT3M5AQ9A505Y8S", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Sure. So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU. I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\n\nThen it actually has to get produced — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.\n\nOnce it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\n\nThen it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date. So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X6267JX8G55G0DC9PYQ5NX", + "role": "system", + "purpose": "dispatch", + "display": "diagnostic", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6267D8KT3M5AQ9A505Y8S", + "signal": { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "attributes": { + "affordanceId": "affordance_toolu_01BPxGhtkoW98xCiTTeNLW4a" + } + }, + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nTake that Meridian white order specifically and walk me through its whole life on the floor — from the moment it becomes something you have to schedule, to the moment it's out the door. Just the steps in order, four or five of them is plenty; I'll dig into each one after.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X627DQ7TGEE9S1TJW3D74H", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6267D8KT3M5AQ9A505Y8S", + "turnId": "turn_01M0X6267K6HQCJ8QRHQE6AJ66", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "I should sweep before going deeper, but there's a more structural question worth asking first: does an order stay on one line through all four production stages, or are mixing and milling handled on separate equipment? That distinction seems load-bearing for how I model the process.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_sweep", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01XJmxiS6eof5g1i1oSv8mM5", + "state": "output-available", + "input": {}, + "output": { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-a0a0bd7a-32fe-47e3-a2f4-8a452fe769bc", + "capture-de512bde-aa52-4147-933f-81439aa5ec6d", + "capture-a6e8dc50-fffb-494d-8bd2-59704c0427e4", + "capture-3cb49f42-f479-4b67-be4c-22c8f9771f6e", + "capture-5628ca29-5985-4005-aa3f-a6885dc38223", + "capture-6d4d1074-f6fe-4d4c-95c2-f242a6f98233", + "capture-a0b65576-83d8-4134-9fbe-9b059663ae12", + "capture-cbe1db57-3beb-4e48-9ef4-d81d638fa94a", + "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "capture-fa56fa8b-611a-4a38-9a42-1bd038e52d80", + "capture-dba4ec08-0265-420c-95d2-4dce250ae0b6", + "capture-0b2046b4-55c8-4ce3-abac-296d6abe469d", + "capture-8156b872-b3c2-43db-aa67-56166bebe556", + "capture-585f76f6-e841-4ef2-94df-036e711ebce8", + "capture-589bc2db-8fc9-4d65-8024-b34ce4cd736a", + "capture-07de77cc-9de8-41e9-92f6-8fe06a6263c9", + "capture-6ca0ba27-000e-4cbd-ae25-39dc7a1c679c", + "capture-22890cbe-8720-408f-a3c9-fcbfe3826f2b", + "capture-551ab6a6-2f47-4514-ad0b-f5995ef609b2", + "capture-7df09f81-9c85-43ac-b69e-306d540f8afb", + "capture-e0f39723-a7e5-4656-a8fb-0e2b50bb82da", + "capture-d8dffb0f-f148-4af2-ba7e-478a6a1b38c6", + "capture-a2938097-b902-4f24-8e15-70f4b8ce95fb", + "capture-896881a6-c9ec-469f-ab03-4a56b59f6cad", + "capture-4a3ae53c-2c2f-4664-9499-7e81c254abc5", + "capture-d662739b-76f0-429a-829a-ccb79763b6b9", + "capture-a9e42aa6-8d30-4ded-a8c4-f24220cfb292", + "capture-b2c62684-e1ee-4d7f-b616-0ceb17a7282e" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [], + "advisories": [ + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a6ad400e-463a-4e08-80e5-1b5448355f62", + "capture-a0a0bd7a-32fe-47e3-a2f4-8a452fe769bc" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-053410a5-6574-4355-aabf-dd972f0088e1", + "capture-d8dffb0f-f148-4af2-ba7e-478a6a1b38c6" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-6ca0ba27-000e-4cbd-ae25-39dc7a1c679c", + "capture-22890cbe-8720-408f-a3c9-fcbfe3826f2b" + ] + } + ], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "2b8efdb41c191608", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 28, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 2b8efdb41c191608 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 15 node(s) from 43 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [below-required-precision] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam is known as a range; the model needs spread. Smallest delta: move it from range to spread.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam is open: the expert answered \"unknown-to-user\", pointing at rate of filler jams not yet asked or given; that is not a value.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [below-required-precision] \"how long it takes\" on activity:Line 2 filler jam is known as a range; the model needs spread. Smallest delta: move it from range to spread.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:Line 2 filler jam.\n- … and 16 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n6 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + }, + "durationMs": 85838 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "I should ask whether a single line represents one consistent resource across all four stages structurally.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_ask", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01VcV1KAvgD2ZWUJnBfGcBuh", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "question": "When you say an order is \"on Line 2\" — does that one order occupy Line 2 through all four stages, mix through fill, so nothing else can start until it's done? Or are mix and mill separate kit that other orders can be using while Line 2's filler is running something else? I'm trying to get right what's actually being contended for when you move an order between lines." + }, + "output": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_01VcV1KAvgD2ZWUJnBfGcBuh", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "When you say an order is \"on Line 2\" — does that one order occupy Line 2 through all four stages, mix through fill, so nothing else can start until it's done? Or are mix and mill separate kit that other orders can be using while Line 2's filler is running something else? I'm trying to get right what's actually being contended for when you move an order between lines.", + "payload": { + "question": "When you say an order is \"on Line 2\" — does that one order occupy Line 2 through all four stages, mix through fill, so nothing else can start until it's done? Or are mix and mill separate kit that other orders can be using while Line 2's filler is running something else? I'm trying to get right what's actually being contended for when you move an order between lines." + } + }, + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "data-affordance", + "data": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_01VcV1KAvgD2ZWUJnBfGcBuh", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "When you say an order is \"on Line 2\" — does that one order occupy Line 2 through all four stages, mix through fill, so nothing else can start until it's done? Or are mix and mill separate kit that other orders can be using while Line 2's filler is running something else? I'm trying to get right what's actually being contended for when you move an order between lines.", + "payload": { + "question": "When you say an order is \"on Line 2\" — does that one order occupy Line 2 through all four stages, mix through fill, so nothing else can start until it's done? Or are mix and mill separate kit that other orders can be using while Line 2's filler is running something else? I'm trying to get right what's actually being contended for when you move an order between lines." + } + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTBYNjVBUkFSUzdOVFBYR0UxR0hRQUtH", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X65ARARS7NTPXGE1GHQAKG", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good question, and this is where the sheet lies to me a bit if I'm honest. On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \"Line 2\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.\n\nBut physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between. So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it. That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.\n\nWhat I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait. I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it, and engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X65ARH0JRQCSWP5RADNMZZ", + "role": "system", + "purpose": "dispatch", + "display": "diagnostic", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X65ARARS7NTPXGE1GHQAKG", + "signal": { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "attributes": { + "affordanceId": "affordance_toolu_01VcV1KAvgD2ZWUJnBfGcBuh" + } + }, + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nWhen you say an order is \"on Line 2\" — does that one order occupy Line 2 through all four stages, mix through fill, so nothing else can start until it's done? Or are mix and mill separate kit that other orders can be using while Line 2's filler is running something else? I'm trying to get right what's actually being contended for when you move an order between lines.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X65BPF0SEY0PZYS6H0ZMRA", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X65ARARS7NTPXGE1GHQAKG", + "turnId": "turn_01M0X65ARMJAKD92XH4MD19G8V", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "I'm noting the tank capacity between mill and fill as a genuine second question worth surfacing—the scheduler's suspicion that it's costing them more than admitted could be its own model output. I'll flag it as an optional add-on but stay focused on keeping the current slice tight.\n\nBefore locking down durations for the four stages, I want to check whether they want the model able to test that buffer question, since that determines if the stages need to be separate nodes rather than collapsed. Worth asking directly.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "That's a really valuable thing to have said — the sheet says one line, one order; the floor says four bits of kit with small tanks between them. I'll record both rather than pick one.\n\nThat choice matters for what the model can answer, so let me put it to you.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_ask", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01CfCi6guTLjrxg8Hg8QcC6A", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "question": "Would you want the model to be able to settle that hunch — i.e. to show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing you — or is that a side curiosity, and the model's real job stays \"filler's down, switch or wait?\" I'll build the stages as separate contended kit if the tank question is in scope, and that means I'll need tank sizes and stage rates from you rather than just a line rate." + }, + "output": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_01CfCi6guTLjrxg8Hg8QcC6A", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "Would you want the model to be able to settle that hunch — i.e. to show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing you — or is that a side curiosity, and the model's real job stays \"filler's down, switch or wait?\" I'll build the stages as separate contended kit if the tank question is in scope, and that means I'll need tank sizes and stage rates from you rather than just a line rate.", + "payload": { + "question": "Would you want the model to be able to settle that hunch — i.e. to show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing you — or is that a side curiosity, and the model's real job stays \"filler's down, switch or wait?\" I'll build the stages as separate contended kit if the tank question is in scope, and that means I'll need tank sizes and stage rates from you rather than just a line rate." + } + }, + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "data-affordance", + "data": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_01CfCi6guTLjrxg8Hg8QcC6A", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "Would you want the model to be able to settle that hunch — i.e. to show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing you — or is that a side curiosity, and the model's real job stays \"filler's down, switch or wait?\" I'll build the stages as separate contended kit if the tank question is in scope, and that means I'll need tank sizes and stage rates from you rather than just a line rate.", + "payload": { + "question": "Would you want the model to be able to settle that hunch — i.e. to show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing you — or is that a side curiosity, and the model's real job stays \"filler's down, switch or wait?\" I'll build the stages as separate contended kit if the tank question is in scope, and that means I'll need tank sizes and stage rates from you rather than just a line rate." + } + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTBYNjVWSk1CQlFBRTNHR1I3QVZGMlBN", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X65VJMBBQAE3GGR7AVF2PM", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "No, I do want that in scope — if I'm honest, the disruption question and the tank question are the same underlying thing to me. Half the reason Line 1's options are worse when Line 2 goes down is because it feels sluggish and blocked in ways I can't pin on the published line rate. If the model can actually show me \"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\" that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch.\n\nSo yes — build it as separate stages if that's what it takes. I'll warn you now, though: I don't have clean numbers for tank sizes or stage-by-stage rates. I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet, but nobody's ever broken that down by \"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that. Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head. Don't assume I can hand you clean stage rates — I can give you gut-feel and known bottleneck stories, but not real numbers off the top of my head.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X65VJRZ2Z8MPBDYT2JXY2Q", + "role": "system", + "purpose": "dispatch", + "display": "diagnostic", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X65VJMBBQAE3GGR7AVF2PM", + "signal": { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "attributes": { + "affordanceId": "affordance_toolu_01CfCi6guTLjrxg8Hg8QcC6A" + } + }, + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nWould you want the model to be able to settle that hunch — i.e. to show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing you — or is that a side curiosity, and the model's real job stays \"filler's down, switch or wait?\" I'll build the stages as separate contended kit if the tank question is in scope, and that means I'll need tank sizes and stage rates from you rather than just a line rate.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X661931SMD34V46M0CR2G8", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X65VJMBBQAE3GGR7AVF2PM", + "turnId": "turn_01M0X65VJT1Y8A8EVNR55W2SH9", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, that covers the second objective, and I should defer stage rates and tank sizes pending deposit of historian data and engineering drawings. Next I want to ask what he already has on hand — end-to-end batch time per SKU per line as a spread, framed around mean versus tail behavior.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Understood, and that's an honest and useful boundary: stage-level rates live in the historian, tank sizes on engineering drawings, neither in your head. I'll record those as open with their source rather than let me invent them.\n\nLet me take what you *do* carry.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_sweep", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MhhBwG1zLCo3gsmBmjK8Z9", + "state": "output-available", + "input": {}, + "output": { + "status": "refused", + "refusal": { + "code": "evidence-quote-not-found", + "excerpt": "I know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit", + "message": "No user entry contains the verbatim quote \"I know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit\". Repair the quote to match the user's words exactly." + } + }, + "durationMs": 97241 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "I noticed a misquote in the captured text — it should read \"I just know the tanks are small\" rather than what was extracted, referring to the one between mill and fill on Line 1. I'll flag this discrepancy and retry the sweep to get the accurate wording.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The sweep bounced on a misquote of mine: the expert's words were \"I **just** know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit\". Retrying with the verbatim text.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_sweep", + "toolCallId": "toolu_011T9qYtKQVZmhDSeix2mtTS", + "state": "output-available", + "input": {}, + "output": { + "status": "refused", + "refusal": { + "code": "evidence-quote-not-found", + "excerpt": "and then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer", + "message": "No user entry contains the verbatim quote \"and then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer\". Repair the quote to match the user's words exactly." + } + }, + "durationMs": 149597 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "I need to fix the capitalization of \"And\" at the start of that sentence and retry the phrasing about the bumped tint order slipping past its due date.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Second bounce, same cause — capitalisation: the expert wrote \"**And** then whatever happens to the bumped tint order…\". Retrying.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_sweep", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LVoYY2iWjxVep5RNsBHmyZ", + "state": "output-available", + "input": {}, + "output": { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-1cb33f48-6553-4e4f-a8a0-37d7631b08ea", + "capture-f073c3ed-2a89-4499-b3b2-fe160e8c1057", + "capture-c9864a2c-cbb3-41c9-97a6-e44cc1d7d424", + "capture-480c2821-4d80-495b-a652-f5de8b035144", + "capture-f3f2c366-eab0-49fa-951c-773f77aa11b2", + "capture-3bb35fb7-3954-45d4-839f-20ee46a8c052", + "capture-e552ac87-8cfa-4091-a262-6fba33ab9f83", + "capture-c74bc46d-649f-4e44-a48d-3a005dc44a7e", + "capture-dd037a1c-63c0-47b8-8886-81c6d1f70226", + "capture-6c46c958-82b9-4ba0-bf0f-363fd70b6dbc", + "capture-ee4eb482-b4b3-4392-94d7-ef9dc0a6ca98", + "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae", + "capture-32521b14-4f1e-41ff-ab95-dfc11d8eee37", + "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c", + "capture-c1704cba-8451-47a5-add8-2e388b330a1f", + "capture-68ab39e5-8046-4f93-887e-11ed3e3b1da3", + "capture-c6d485c6-0e21-4cc0-b626-9091448d6ba1", + "capture-663aaa9f-2bcb-4e01-937f-9d16ce860e80", + "capture-737200bb-8f75-455f-b90a-3363a30d5fce", + "capture-78203b7c-8e00-469c-9d53-01d1a656d5c1", + "capture-86a1823e-ea26-45a4-b410-c9ecb6040ea3", + "capture-ee79fe32-58f7-4a71-8c15-61f2fedc0a11", + "capture-addb8fe4-ac6f-4c59-a6be-12d60d197a53", + "capture-42e0a99d-6cf6-4b30-8199-b430405ba25b", + "capture-a27c0fc1-57f3-4eed-bea8-15453c84f2da", + "capture-0f6aea65-d3a4-430b-b532-4f1100303f9e", + "capture-a3f706dd-453a-4543-9990-26efb1b079dd", + "capture-67de2e75-132c-43a7-b64e-412343204931", + "capture-bf082835-a2ca-4279-80e5-726f157270bd", + "capture-ce28dd53-a53d-4bc9-9956-dc3268c35e3e", + "capture-9b28544e-b867-4018-9c35-2691cef17a62", + "capture-4c4af9ea-df1a-4449-adb7-d48fce7eae93", + "capture-dabdbb5f-9eca-4afb-ad50-5b381d9dfa4f", + "capture-292e1165-0990-4d17-b6db-153c675fd66c", + "capture-d509546d-b9bb-4b3b-b82d-a65b02b2f5dc", + "capture-54d606d7-8c61-4f0a-bd5f-867bba1af3f7", + "capture-b0a7a08e-c528-4592-ba81-e6026b3f356a", + "capture-9dfaeda1-b5ff-4581-9c8b-d487fe7b9277", + "capture-b0908788-ec79-4481-b056-1fa606930f85" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [], + "advisories": [ + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-585f76f6-e841-4ef2-94df-036e711ebce8", + "capture-ee79fe32-58f7-4a71-8c15-61f2fedc0a11" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-6ca0ba27-000e-4cbd-ae25-39dc7a1c679c", + "capture-86a1823e-ea26-45a4-b410-c9ecb6040ea3" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-22890cbe-8720-408f-a3c9-fcbfe3826f2b", + "capture-86a1823e-ea26-45a4-b410-c9ecb6040ea3" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-551ab6a6-2f47-4514-ad0b-f5995ef609b2", + "capture-addb8fe4-ac6f-4c59-a6be-12d60d197a53" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-7df09f81-9c85-43ac-b69e-306d540f8afb", + "capture-42e0a99d-6cf6-4b30-8199-b430405ba25b" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b2c62684-e1ee-4d7f-b616-0ceb17a7282e", + "capture-b0a7a08e-c528-4592-ba81-e6026b3f356a" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae", + "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-663aaa9f-2bcb-4e01-937f-9d16ce860e80", + "capture-9dfaeda1-b5ff-4581-9c8b-d487fe7b9277" + ] + } + ], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "3157c77c0d581ebb", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 28, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 3157c77c0d581ebb (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 28 node(s) from 82 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam is open: the expert answered \"unknown-to-user\", pointing at rate of filler jams not yet asked or given; that is not a value.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:tint-to-white washdown has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:tint-to-white washdown.\n- … and 16 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n19 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + }, + "durationMs": 149366 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "I'm noticing 28 nodes with duplicate names like \"filler jam\" and \"Line 2 filler jam\" that I'll need to consolidate, and objectives lack dependency links, so I should ask the expert what the answer actually hinges on. Next I want to get end-to-end batch times as a distribution rather than a single number, so I'll ask what quantiles or spread data he has on his sheet.\n\nI should also ask about run duration for a white batch on Line 2, and whether that duration varies by line or SKU.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Right — I have your sheet-level knowledge to draw on, so let me take it at that level.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_ask", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0114D18YCRQ5SdR2RDUdY11m", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "question": "Take that Meridian white on Line 2. From the moment it starts mixing to the moment the last pack comes off the filler — what's a typical run? And because runs vary: one run in ten goes worse than what, and one in ten better than what? Then tell me whether those figures change if it's Line 1 instead, or if it's a tint rather than a white." + }, + "output": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_0114D18YCRQ5SdR2RDUdY11m", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "Take that Meridian white on Line 2. From the moment it starts mixing to the moment the last pack comes off the filler — what's a typical run? And because runs vary: one run in ten goes worse than what, and one in ten better than what? Then tell me whether those figures change if it's Line 1 instead, or if it's a tint rather than a white.", + "payload": { + "question": "Take that Meridian white on Line 2. From the moment it starts mixing to the moment the last pack comes off the filler — what's a typical run? And because runs vary: one run in ten goes worse than what, and one in ten better than what? Then tell me whether those figures change if it's Line 1 instead, or if it's a tint rather than a white." + } + }, + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "data-affordance", + "data": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_0114D18YCRQ5SdR2RDUdY11m", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "Take that Meridian white on Line 2. From the moment it starts mixing to the moment the last pack comes off the filler — what's a typical run? And because runs vary: one run in ten goes worse than what, and one in ten better than what? Then tell me whether those figures change if it's Line 1 instead, or if it's a tint rather than a white.", + "payload": { + "question": "Take that Meridian white on Line 2. From the moment it starts mixing to the moment the last pack comes off the filler — what's a typical run? And because runs vary: one run in ten goes worse than what, and one in ten better than what? Then tell me whether those figures change if it's Line 1 instead, or if it's a tint rather than a white." + } + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTBYNksxMlExSzlEM0c2MEZCSlc1R1dS", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6K12Q1K9D3G60FBJW5GWR", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Right, so a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size. That includes fill-up time getting the line running plus the actual throughput.\n\nBad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours, and that's usually not the run itself slowing down, that's more \"the filler hiccupped twice\" or QA-adjacent stuff creeping in, though I'm folding some of that in loosely. Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.\n\nOn Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten. That's the \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.\n\nTints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap. I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X6K13KW39FXRCVX7KNZJ51", + "role": "system", + "purpose": "dispatch", + "display": "diagnostic", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6K12Q1K9D3G60FBJW5GWR", + "signal": { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "attributes": { + "affordanceId": "affordance_toolu_0114D18YCRQ5SdR2RDUdY11m" + } + }, + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nTake that Meridian white on Line 2. From the moment it starts mixing to the moment the last pack comes off the filler — what's a typical run? And because runs vary: one run in ten goes worse than what, and one in ten better than what? Then tell me whether those figures change if it's Line 1 instead, or if it's a tint rather than a white.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X6K24RQ3TM35JGS0PY0833", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6K12Q1K9D3G60FBJW5GWR", + "turnId": "turn_01M0X6K13XV6RS6DM925SKCCD5", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "I notice a small inconsistency around his tint speed comment, though it's minor. More importantly, I should flag a real modeling hazard: his bad-day figure of 12-13h might already include filler hiccups, which would double-count with jam events I'm planning to model separately — worth asking him directly whether that estimate includes jams.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_sweep", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01XE9cAp9zgnYi27UvGN6n6f", + "state": "output-available", + "input": {}, + "output": { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-d079be7f-20b9-4bb6-85e8-6ed631cb8057", + "capture-9d5063d7-b9fb-400e-8b54-f618c6fde20e", + "capture-3245b29a-3687-4313-97c5-e0455e5889ba", + "capture-225430d9-ae4d-4ef7-b439-6f9b1ccd50c5", + "capture-770314e5-f47a-463e-908a-1d8c23ee60f5", + "capture-6ff1c59a-0664-487b-a946-2680043419a2", + "capture-be0c3675-ae93-41c5-9eaa-7d36d84617cb", + "capture-3e2a5a8a-bd99-4642-afcf-f9d3dfe2e9f6", + "capture-e9bb0ea0-9052-4006-96ad-c166a1d3a957", + "capture-27ee0ed5-50d0-47f6-94b8-77e090bca50f", + "capture-f8e69ae7-6d72-4e37-9b53-b67b47115db5", + "capture-2a491098-b602-4b46-bbaa-439e291027db", + "capture-c4aefe40-a022-4990-96a1-b74243850715", + "capture-76c7250e-6575-4e31-b667-113f3a497cce", + "capture-7da94524-13b5-4c11-a1b4-9cb1b0f07e19", + "capture-c8f57cec-d8f5-42c0-9b99-29a1a71eab73", + "capture-d6985d8d-f85e-4556-a091-df64be080ba6", + "capture-97bc8f2b-2070-4c8a-8af4-7233caeef498", + "capture-04a6f876-12f4-4f53-b6f2-f8e5fa9c87bc", + "capture-592b83e0-ece3-4e98-aedf-cdf70c202e96", + "capture-32fe7be9-75c7-464c-87cb-ca38fef4039b", + "capture-31556043-9787-40dc-8c0d-b74a47ed3589", + "capture-1f732daa-9626-420c-980f-5c2b88d9bff3", + "capture-2afae8eb-1155-4b07-9842-971df47a6a7d", + "capture-d2d6e303-2f63-478a-ace1-0bf61abbfddd", + "capture-5548a18b-9f79-4475-a9ab-83a74c750721", + "capture-1ee7c206-0c56-4d6b-b091-5861f9c40438", + "capture-4b706f60-c02f-4973-aa58-2d3ded113c39", + "capture-97ea5a05-d89c-4a7d-a136-f90526beaa27", + "capture-6d66bc49-da1a-49e3-8d98-e5d732b6e4bb", + "capture-46d37104-fb87-4105-95d5-4448aade81ac", + "capture-0cdda695-1dfa-43ef-971c-b9db09403a07" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [], + "advisories": [ + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a6ad400e-463a-4e08-80e5-1b5448355f62", + "capture-d079be7f-20b9-4bb6-85e8-6ed631cb8057" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a0a0bd7a-32fe-47e3-a2f4-8a452fe769bc", + "capture-d079be7f-20b9-4bb6-85e8-6ed631cb8057" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-cbe1db57-3beb-4e48-9ef4-d81d638fa94a", + "capture-2a491098-b602-4b46-bbaa-439e291027db" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-585f76f6-e841-4ef2-94df-036e711ebce8", + "capture-2afae8eb-1155-4b07-9842-971df47a6a7d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c74bc46d-649f-4e44-a48d-3a005dc44a7e", + "capture-e9bb0ea0-9052-4006-96ad-c166a1d3a957" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-663aaa9f-2bcb-4e01-937f-9d16ce860e80", + "capture-46d37104-fb87-4105-95d5-4448aade81ac" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee79fe32-58f7-4a71-8c15-61f2fedc0a11", + "capture-2afae8eb-1155-4b07-9842-971df47a6a7d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-0f6aea65-d3a4-430b-b532-4f1100303f9e", + "capture-31556043-9787-40dc-8c0d-b74a47ed3589" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-67de2e75-132c-43a7-b64e-412343204931", + "capture-d2d6e303-2f63-478a-ace1-0bf61abbfddd" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-54d606d7-8c61-4f0a-bd5f-867bba1af3f7", + "capture-4b706f60-c02f-4973-aa58-2d3ded113c39" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-9dfaeda1-b5ff-4581-9c8b-d487fe7b9277", + "capture-46d37104-fb87-4105-95d5-4448aade81ac" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b0908788-ec79-4481-b056-1fa606930f85", + "capture-6d66bc49-da1a-49e3-8d98-e5d732b6e4bb" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-6ff1c59a-0664-487b-a946-2680043419a2", + "capture-76c7250e-6575-4e31-b667-113f3a497cce" + ] + } + ], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "2e4f73ea071077f9", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 9, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 2e4f73ea071077f9 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 36 node(s) from 114 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:where Line 1 loses its time has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" has not been addressed on objective:where Line 1 loses its time.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:which option actually loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" on objective:which option actually loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:which option loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" on objective:which option loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P08 on objective:where Line 1 loses its time: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n\n33 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + }, + "durationMs": 122266 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The remaining gaps are objective-level: duplicate objective nodes and dependencies lacking support. I should ask the expert to clarify what the answer depends on in their own words and resolve the duplicate phrasing, but first the double-counting issue matters since it affects the spread I just recorded — I'll raise that question now.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "One thing you said gives me pause, and I'd rather sort it now than bake it in wrong.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_ask", + "toolCallId": "toolu_016Sy8K81vYAJqTRfxPP8zou", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "question": "You said the bad-day twelve-to-thirteen hours is \"usually not the run itself slowing down\" but \"the filler hiccupped twice,\" and that you're folding that in loosely. If I model filler jams as their own separate event with their own rate and repair time — which I need to do for the switch-or-wait question — then that twelve-to-thirteen would be counting jams twice. So: if you strip the hiccups out and imagine a run where nothing breaks, what does the bad-day-in-ten look like then? Or is a clean run just never much worse than the eight or nine?" + }, + "output": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_016Sy8K81vYAJqTRfxPP8zou", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "You said the bad-day twelve-to-thirteen hours is \"usually not the run itself slowing down\" but \"the filler hiccupped twice,\" and that you're folding that in loosely. If I model filler jams as their own separate event with their own rate and repair time — which I need to do for the switch-or-wait question — then that twelve-to-thirteen would be counting jams twice. So: if you strip the hiccups out and imagine a run where nothing breaks, what does the bad-day-in-ten look like then? Or is a clean run just never much worse than the eight or nine?", + "payload": { + "question": "You said the bad-day twelve-to-thirteen hours is \"usually not the run itself slowing down\" but \"the filler hiccupped twice,\" and that you're folding that in loosely. If I model filler jams as their own separate event with their own rate and repair time — which I need to do for the switch-or-wait question — then that twelve-to-thirteen would be counting jams twice. So: if you strip the hiccups out and imagine a run where nothing breaks, what does the bad-day-in-ten look like then? Or is a clean run just never much worse than the eight or nine?" + } + }, + "durationMs": 0 + }, + { + "type": "data-affordance", + "data": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_016Sy8K81vYAJqTRfxPP8zou", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "You said the bad-day twelve-to-thirteen hours is \"usually not the run itself slowing down\" but \"the filler hiccupped twice,\" and that you're folding that in loosely. If I model filler jams as their own separate event with their own rate and repair time — which I need to do for the switch-or-wait question — then that twelve-to-thirteen would be counting jams twice. So: if you strip the hiccups out and imagine a run where nothing breaks, what does the bad-day-in-ten look like then? Or is a clean run just never much worse than the eight or nine?", + "payload": { + "question": "You said the bad-day twelve-to-thirteen hours is \"usually not the run itself slowing down\" but \"the filler hiccupped twice,\" and that you're folding that in loosely. If I model filler jams as their own separate event with their own rate and repair time — which I need to do for the switch-or-wait question — then that twelve-to-thirteen would be counting jams twice. So: if you strip the hiccups out and imagine a run where nothing breaks, what does the bad-day-in-ten look like then? Or is a clean run just never much worse than the eight or nine?" + } + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTBYNlFDUzk5UVFZMEUyQ0FFMzkxVFgy", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6QCS99QQY0E2CAE391TX2", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "That's fair, and yeah, I was sloppy folding them together. If nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup, nothing — a clean run doesn't really vary that much from typical. Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number.\n\nThe twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup. So you're right to pull that apart: clean-run variability is small, and the big bad days are really the breakdown showing up inside the run, not the run itself being slow.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X6QCSWHK8MFRPQXXX1TMSB", + "role": "system", + "purpose": "dispatch", + "display": "diagnostic", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6QCS99QQY0E2CAE391TX2", + "signal": { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "attributes": { + "affordanceId": "affordance_toolu_016Sy8K81vYAJqTRfxPP8zou" + } + }, + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nYou said the bad-day twelve-to-thirteen hours is \"usually not the run itself slowing down\" but \"the filler hiccupped twice,\" and that you're folding that in loosely. If I model filler jams as their own separate event with their own rate and repair time — which I need to do for the switch-or-wait question — then that twelve-to-thirteen would be counting jams twice. So: if you strip the hiccups out and imagine a run where nothing breaks, what does the bad-day-in-ten look like then? Or is a clean run just never much worse than the eight or nine?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X6QDQH7WRW1YXB1K9S7AVR", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6QCS99QQY0E2CAE391TX2", + "turnId": "turn_01M0X6QCT6K0JJCHHCXATKD0B7", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "I'll supersede and sweep, then focus on the filler jam rate (P01), which is the key unknown for the main objective. I'm also noting that objective dependencies remain unspecified, but I'll set that aside and ask about jam rate first.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_sweep", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01VSwNLQXxdV94UeX8FEfjsW", + "state": "output-available", + "input": {}, + "output": { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-a5926e2a-88e8-459e-a296-282b16d499a8", + "capture-ea1779b0-9a83-42aa-92d1-746e73de43cc", + "capture-1288a3df-c7fd-4319-8d4e-a228572ba0b0", + "capture-4be8c533-88e3-4f97-bcef-9b445cfeb3e6", + "capture-bb291ebf-9fe0-4a6e-9840-e7d7fac44033", + "capture-edfaf81c-c276-4b57-a88c-914953b1c6be", + "capture-13339551-ff3a-414f-8260-e1296530d8ec", + "capture-535749ea-ba99-4d11-84c0-8203fd058329", + "capture-79eccb7f-a787-40d4-a2fa-e95bfda82d18", + "capture-3c6b3e85-7fd3-4831-9201-6e3ef525e7cf", + "capture-f1eca8a3-a2c2-4d92-a428-763c67e7b02a", + "capture-823c9593-db42-45eb-9515-937e6b90bd33", + "capture-f7e12936-7567-4b38-be19-a45fb5dc6274", + "capture-c27fb36e-eb7f-42be-b6ef-c5dd9e9283e2", + "capture-5755b52c-e250-4fae-9c9b-ac6eba42d092", + "capture-afd366c9-1ea6-4b73-b2c0-ed97c9af0c79", + "capture-86fd1cfb-379b-42f7-bdbb-8586dae7f755", + "capture-90d36431-4341-4f9e-8bf6-8b5354b2fedd", + "capture-7ef3368b-e678-4c58-b7f9-137d1607d8ec", + "capture-10d88b79-af70-4a14-90c1-da56ad526d36", + "capture-921611c3-21b5-4ab2-8e56-9b8cdaa2eba2", + "capture-6cf8c229-ab84-4448-abc6-3e7f4a76bb4c", + "capture-ce789325-dd40-4b21-a936-73485ccb90b9", + "capture-1ba32034-be19-432b-a012-326b682fd357", + "capture-526685d5-3021-40f4-8cb9-a4e8d92002b7", + "capture-35f88f0f-1e4e-44a3-9d47-33c6942a9b16", + "capture-e28ed067-b6a4-40d8-935a-3598e2401cc1", + "capture-a3d8c0b7-97bf-443d-aa86-8fef8ea0bd5a", + "capture-4e68a0cf-eccb-4b69-91f0-c7fb74a2b639", + "capture-cfe5bf57-8879-4592-a938-1527d73c8bac", + "capture-b3079749-c23b-4ade-ac51-9bbff19806fb", + "capture-e7d9cbf7-5a12-4e04-8fbf-b2b0581efa5d", + "capture-23c5706e-37c1-481e-9438-8fae70973c13", + "capture-00863ee1-f99c-48b2-b680-bf4eb71e6a57", + "capture-196b8447-3958-444f-9860-8de7330299ec" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [], + "advisories": [ + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a6ad400e-463a-4e08-80e5-1b5448355f62", + "capture-a5926e2a-88e8-459e-a296-282b16d499a8" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-3f2444d5-8001-46d9-8a92-c85f8c6f8d6a", + "capture-1288a3df-c7fd-4319-8d4e-a228572ba0b0" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b42a88f7-65b8-4f76-833d-18f39111ec49", + "capture-526685d5-3021-40f4-8cb9-a4e8d92002b7" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a0a0bd7a-32fe-47e3-a2f4-8a452fe769bc", + "capture-a5926e2a-88e8-459e-a296-282b16d499a8" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-cbe1db57-3beb-4e48-9ef4-d81d638fa94a", + "capture-5755b52c-e250-4fae-9c9b-ac6eba42d092" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-dba4ec08-0265-420c-95d2-4dce250ae0b6", + "capture-f7e12936-7567-4b38-be19-a45fb5dc6274" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-585f76f6-e841-4ef2-94df-036e711ebce8", + "capture-a3d8c0b7-97bf-443d-aa86-8fef8ea0bd5a" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b2c62684-e1ee-4d7f-b616-0ceb17a7282e", + "capture-b3079749-c23b-4ade-ac51-9bbff19806fb" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c74bc46d-649f-4e44-a48d-3a005dc44a7e", + "capture-4e68a0cf-eccb-4b69-91f0-c7fb74a2b639" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee79fe32-58f7-4a71-8c15-61f2fedc0a11", + "capture-a3d8c0b7-97bf-443d-aa86-8fef8ea0bd5a" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-d509546d-b9bb-4b3b-b82d-a65b02b2f5dc", + "capture-e7d9cbf7-5a12-4e04-8fbf-b2b0581efa5d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b0a7a08e-c528-4592-ba81-e6026b3f356a", + "capture-b3079749-c23b-4ade-ac51-9bbff19806fb" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-d079be7f-20b9-4bb6-85e8-6ed631cb8057", + "capture-a5926e2a-88e8-459e-a296-282b16d499a8" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-225430d9-ae4d-4ef7-b439-6f9b1ccd50c5", + "capture-4be8c533-88e3-4f97-bcef-9b445cfeb3e6" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e9bb0ea0-9052-4006-96ad-c166a1d3a957", + "capture-4e68a0cf-eccb-4b69-91f0-c7fb74a2b639" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-2a491098-b602-4b46-bbaa-439e291027db", + "capture-5755b52c-e250-4fae-9c9b-ac6eba42d092" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c4aefe40-a022-4990-96a1-b74243850715", + "capture-823c9593-db42-45eb-9515-937e6b90bd33" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-1f732daa-9626-420c-980f-5c2b88d9bff3", + "capture-35f88f0f-1e4e-44a3-9d47-33c6942a9b16" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-2afae8eb-1155-4b07-9842-971df47a6a7d", + "capture-a3d8c0b7-97bf-443d-aa86-8fef8ea0bd5a" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-f1eca8a3-a2c2-4d92-a428-763c67e7b02a", + "capture-c27fb36e-eb7f-42be-b6ef-c5dd9e9283e2" + ] + } + ], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "36d1240e30d0f4d1", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 9, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 36d1240e30d0f4d1 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 41 node(s) from 149 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:where Line 1 loses its time has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" has not been addressed on objective:where Line 1 loses its time.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:which option actually loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" on objective:which option actually loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"the question, in the expert's words\" on objective:which option loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights\" on objective:which option loses less has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P08 on objective:where Line 1 loses its time: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n\n38 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + }, + "durationMs": 155454 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "38 of 41 nodes fall outside any objective's slice since objectives currently have no dependencies — that's the real structural gap I need to fix by getting the expert to state their questions crisply and what they hinge on. The filler jam rate is also worth asking about, but fixing objectives first is what makes everything else actually count, so I'll craft a question that addresses both.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Two housekeeping things I want to settle, because right now the model has plenty of plant detail but the two questions it's meant to answer aren't yet wired to any of it.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_ask", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01EHPQiwUUuqA7BA9xjbGyvx", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "question": "If the tool had a box where you typed the question, how would you write the two of them — the disruption one and the Line 1 one — in one sentence each, as you'd actually phrase them? And for each, name the things about the plant the answer hangs on: for the disruption one I'd guess it's the lines, the run times, the washdown, the jam and the due dates — tell me what I'm missing or what doesn't belong." + }, + "output": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_01EHPQiwUUuqA7BA9xjbGyvx", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "If the tool had a box where you typed the question, how would you write the two of them — the disruption one and the Line 1 one — in one sentence each, as you'd actually phrase them? And for each, name the things about the plant the answer hangs on: for the disruption one I'd guess it's the lines, the run times, the washdown, the jam and the due dates — tell me what I'm missing or what doesn't belong.", + "payload": { + "question": "If the tool had a box where you typed the question, how would you write the two of them — the disruption one and the Line 1 one — in one sentence each, as you'd actually phrase them? And for each, name the things about the plant the answer hangs on: for the disruption one I'd guess it's the lines, the run times, the washdown, the jam and the due dates — tell me what I'm missing or what doesn't belong." + } + }, + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "data-affordance", + "data": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_01EHPQiwUUuqA7BA9xjbGyvx", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "If the tool had a box where you typed the question, how would you write the two of them — the disruption one and the Line 1 one — in one sentence each, as you'd actually phrase them? And for each, name the things about the plant the answer hangs on: for the disruption one I'd guess it's the lines, the run times, the washdown, the jam and the due dates — tell me what I'm missing or what doesn't belong.", + "payload": { + "question": "If the tool had a box where you typed the question, how would you write the two of them — the disruption one and the Line 1 one — in one sentence each, as you'd actually phrase them? And for each, name the things about the plant the answer hangs on: for the disruption one I'd guess it's the lines, the run times, the washdown, the jam and the due dates — tell me what I'm missing or what doesn't belong." + } + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTBYNldaMzBYQTM1WVI2SjVUNkhGTUJO", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6WZ30XA35YR6J5T6HFMBN", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Alright, let me actually try and write these the way I'd type them if I had the box.\n\n**Disruption one:** \"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"\n\nWhat it hangs on: the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way). It hangs on the jam itself — how long is this repair *actually* going to take, which I never know at the time, so really it needs some sense of \"could be quick, could be long\" rather than one number. And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours. And then the knock-on: whatever gets bumped off Line 1, does it blow its own due date, and whose order was it — that's the \"who can absorb it\" judgment call again.\n\nI'd say what's missing from your list, or under-weighted: the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it, and the bumped order's identity matters, not just \"an order got delayed.\" A distributor slipping is fine, so the answer to the question genuinely depends on whose tint was sitting there.\n\n**The Line 1 tank one:** \"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\" That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have. It also probably depends on the product, since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages, so the tank might matter a lot for some products and not at all for others. That's not something I'd have said a month ago.\n\n(Sorry — I've just seen the time, I have the floor huddle in ten minutes. How much more do you need?)", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X6WZ3K2HCKP0WXTWTDDYPS", + "role": "system", + "purpose": "dispatch", + "display": "diagnostic", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6WZ30XA35YR6J5T6HFMBN", + "signal": { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "attributes": { + "affordanceId": "affordance_toolu_01EHPQiwUUuqA7BA9xjbGyvx" + } + }, + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nIf the tool had a box where you typed the question, how would you write the two of them — the disruption one and the Line 1 one — in one sentence each, as you'd actually phrase them? And for each, name the things about the plant the answer hangs on: for the disruption one I'd guess it's the lines, the run times, the washdown, the jam and the due dates — tell me what I'm missing or what doesn't belong.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X6X098KASDR8CJZZTQ1D0A", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6WZ30XA35YR6J5T6HFMBN", + "turnId": "turn_01M0X6WZ3Y82683W9EYJ7RNYMC", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "With ten minutes, I shouldn't rush to close things out — instead I should name what's missing honestly and let them decide where to spend the time. The highest-value gaps are jam rate, repair spread, and washdown/scrap, since those tie directly to the disruption objective and only they have that data, so I'll surface the list and ask them to choose.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_sweep", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014CbqDgUVDxZ1c6STNR2cSC", + "state": "output-available", + "input": {}, + "output": { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-b58883f3-43e2-4626-bc59-a9c091f1d1b5", + "capture-3aa3764b-8dd5-495a-bf3e-b32cbc89ba61", + "capture-57ad71c3-f423-4d91-a9f8-d3ce31f1fca1", + "capture-1a3325b9-15b6-436a-8e7f-feff95d98036", + "capture-0e28490a-6b4b-4996-9b6f-3d9249a7d2dc", + "capture-43c5ef42-68ce-478f-89b0-c552111d807a", + "capture-ccc2d7eb-8a3f-4684-8f1c-a21a51049550", + "capture-a7cac8dd-02ea-4fc2-9b07-981ba2152a06", + "capture-a158a5da-be3a-461f-87c0-69c38cac1a72", + "capture-4c582a37-42ed-4d72-a3dd-5a15a6048a23", + "capture-4043a577-c1b4-44c3-91f3-2194def82bd9", + "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473", + "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006", + "capture-72d414e6-f6a2-420e-8407-667f41535411", + "capture-0958f3c5-59f7-4139-8942-fc5204d9d5dc", + "capture-53f9387d-f037-4d0f-999b-f89a8f113f46", + "capture-d7faeb42-3fb6-4e39-a4db-a4c0fb8430f1", + "capture-38e0effa-0fb7-48ff-907c-2fc9f3e64211", + "capture-9b796f7a-c77b-45a7-83f7-806c40aaf58f", + "capture-314d8187-81ba-478c-8f71-1c9e5826965b", + "capture-345fbb5a-c0c1-4e3a-9015-33b3ad727831", + "capture-60f6f8c8-f52e-443a-adee-6818339f3b35", + "capture-be556841-bf14-4fe0-8c23-ffc773896b2b", + "capture-26d3ac6c-4b27-4765-baa3-8437f06fe8ca", + "capture-da6d10a4-e0f2-4b1d-8e78-4d58cadeb8f2", + "capture-68f9db28-a002-406d-912a-4cc410e5b380", + "capture-0a06d184-bf72-42c4-95b3-7ad88ea4e059", + "capture-3fec05b6-fd93-4759-9598-7870f4f98d7f", + "capture-091d909a-fbcd-4630-bc2d-97bca63e4c7b", + "capture-7111ab55-5d90-44f6-a1d2-4aa1b48da4bb", + "capture-c858f8bf-b62f-41ac-8b6c-bf1ca8c5d44a", + "capture-7d24a8e1-6236-41bd-ab99-3a1036c5b993" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [], + "advisories": [ + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-551ab6a6-2f47-4514-ad0b-f5995ef609b2", + "capture-9b796f7a-c77b-45a7-83f7-806c40aaf58f" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a2938097-b902-4f24-8e15-70f4b8ce95fb", + "capture-be556841-bf14-4fe0-8c23-ffc773896b2b" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b2c62684-e1ee-4d7f-b616-0ceb17a7282e", + "capture-3fec05b6-fd93-4759-9598-7870f4f98d7f" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c74bc46d-649f-4e44-a48d-3a005dc44a7e", + "capture-a7cac8dd-02ea-4fc2-9b07-981ba2152a06" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae", + "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae", + "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c", + "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c", + "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-663aaa9f-2bcb-4e01-937f-9d16ce860e80", + "capture-c858f8bf-b62f-41ac-8b6c-bf1ca8c5d44a" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-addb8fe4-ac6f-4c59-a6be-12d60d197a53", + "capture-9b796f7a-c77b-45a7-83f7-806c40aaf58f" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-d509546d-b9bb-4b3b-b82d-a65b02b2f5dc", + "capture-091d909a-fbcd-4630-bc2d-97bca63e4c7b" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b0a7a08e-c528-4592-ba81-e6026b3f356a", + "capture-3fec05b6-fd93-4759-9598-7870f4f98d7f" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-9dfaeda1-b5ff-4581-9c8b-d487fe7b9277", + "capture-c858f8bf-b62f-41ac-8b6c-bf1ca8c5d44a" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b0908788-ec79-4481-b056-1fa606930f85", + "capture-7d24a8e1-6236-41bd-ab99-3a1036c5b993" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e9bb0ea0-9052-4006-96ad-c166a1d3a957", + "capture-a7cac8dd-02ea-4fc2-9b07-981ba2152a06" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-27ee0ed5-50d0-47f6-94b8-77e090bca50f", + "capture-a158a5da-be3a-461f-87c0-69c38cac1a72" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-f8e69ae7-6d72-4e37-9b53-b67b47115db5", + "capture-4c582a37-42ed-4d72-a3dd-5a15a6048a23" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c4aefe40-a022-4990-96a1-b74243850715", + "capture-4043a577-c1b4-44c3-91f3-2194def82bd9" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-97bc8f2b-2070-4c8a-8af4-7233caeef498", + "capture-0958f3c5-59f7-4139-8942-fc5204d9d5dc" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-1f732daa-9626-420c-980f-5c2b88d9bff3", + "capture-d7faeb42-3fb6-4e39-a4db-a4c0fb8430f1" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-6d66bc49-da1a-49e3-8d98-e5d732b6e4bb", + "capture-7d24a8e1-6236-41bd-ab99-3a1036c5b993" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-46d37104-fb87-4105-95d5-4448aade81ac", + "capture-c858f8bf-b62f-41ac-8b6c-bf1ca8c5d44a" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-823c9593-db42-45eb-9515-937e6b90bd33", + "capture-4043a577-c1b4-44c3-91f3-2194def82bd9" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-35f88f0f-1e4e-44a3-9d47-33c6942a9b16", + "capture-d7faeb42-3fb6-4e39-a4db-a4c0fb8430f1" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4e68a0cf-eccb-4b69-91f0-c7fb74a2b639", + "capture-a7cac8dd-02ea-4fc2-9b07-981ba2152a06" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b3079749-c23b-4ade-ac51-9bbff19806fb", + "capture-3fec05b6-fd93-4759-9598-7870f4f98d7f" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e7d9cbf7-5a12-4e04-8fbf-b2b0581efa5d", + "capture-091d909a-fbcd-4630-bc2d-97bca63e4c7b" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473", + "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006" + ] + } + ], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "1dffca1f0e4725ec", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 42, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 1dffca1f0e4725ec (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 47 node(s) from 181 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unaddressed] \"what it needs before it can start\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"who or what performs it\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- … and 30 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n34 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + }, + "durationMs": 138047 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "With ten minutes left, I should give an honest answer on \"how much more\" and then ask the single highest-value question I still need clarity on—the filler jam rate and repair duration spread—since that's central and only they can supply it. I'll also briefly flag what else remains unknown.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Honest answer to \"how much more\": we're maybe a third of the way. What's still open, roughly in order of how much it costs you: the filler jam's rate and repair time; what the washdown actually costs including ramp scrap; the \"who can absorb a slip\" rule as you actually apply it; how orders arrive into the demand book; QA hold times; and the stage rates and tank size, which we've already agreed aren't in your head. None of that needs to happen today.\n\nFor the ten minutes, I'd spend them on the jam, because you named it as the thing you never know at the time and nobody else can tell me.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_ask", + "toolCallId": "toolu_018NF8gHsprWVmC1fJGrJ3VF", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "question": "Thinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it jam badly enough to stop the run — is that a once-a-week thing, a couple of times a month, once a quarter? Give me a low and high rather than one figure. And then, separately, when it does stop: how long is a typical repair, how long is the one-in-ten bad one, and how long is the one-in-ten quick one?" + }, + "output": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_018NF8gHsprWVmC1fJGrJ3VF", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "Thinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it jam badly enough to stop the run — is that a once-a-week thing, a couple of times a month, once a quarter? Give me a low and high rather than one figure. And then, separately, when it does stop: how long is a typical repair, how long is the one-in-ten bad one, and how long is the one-in-ten quick one?", + "payload": { + "question": "Thinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it jam badly enough to stop the run — is that a once-a-week thing, a couple of times a month, once a quarter? Give me a low and high rather than one figure. And then, separately, when it does stop: how long is a typical repair, how long is the one-in-ten bad one, and how long is the one-in-ten quick one?" + } + }, + "durationMs": 5 + }, + { + "type": "data-affordance", + "data": { + "id": "affordance_toolu_018NF8gHsprWVmC1fJGrJ3VF", + "form": "free-text", + "markdown": "Thinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it jam badly enough to stop the run — is that a once-a-week thing, a couple of times a month, once a quarter? Give me a low and high rather than one figure. And then, separately, when it does stop: how long is a typical repair, how long is the one-in-ten bad one, and how long is the one-in-ten quick one?", + "payload": { + "question": "Thinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it jam badly enough to stop the run — is that a once-a-week thing, a couple of times a month, once a quarter? Give me a low and high rather than one figure. And then, separately, when it does stop: how long is a typical repair, how long is the one-in-ten bad one, and how long is the one-in-ten quick one?" + } + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTBYNzFZSzUyUTFFN1I2WVhWNFJGWktT", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X71YK52Q1E7R6YXV4RFZKS", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Okay, quick version. It's a \"every week or two\" thing — low end maybe once every three weeks if we're lucky, high end twice a week if it's being temperamental. It's not seasonal or anything I can point to, it just runs a streak of bad weeks sometimes.\n\nWhen it stops: typical repair is call it thirty to forty-five minutes — tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again. Quick one-in-ten is more like ten, fifteen minutes, basically a false alarm. The bad one-in-ten is the one that scares me — that's when it's not just a jam but something's actually broken in the filler head, and that can run four, five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift. I don't have a cleaner breakdown than that — maintenance would have the actual work-order times in the CMMS but I've never pulled them.\n\nRight, I need to run — good session though. Same time next week?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X71YKMVR1H78GP6AX8D16B", + "role": "system", + "purpose": "dispatch", + "display": "diagnostic", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X71YK52Q1E7R6YXV4RFZKS", + "signal": { + "tagName": "affordance-reply-bound", + "attributes": { + "affordanceId": "affordance_toolu_018NF8gHsprWVmC1fJGrJ3VF" + } + }, + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nThinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it jam badly enough to stop the run — is that a once-a-week thing, a couple of times a month, once a quarter? Give me a low and high rather than one figure. And then, separately, when it does stop: how long is a typical repair, how long is the one-in-ten bad one, and how long is the one-in-ten quick one?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X725HFECA7NBAA6QPFPNQZ", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X71YK52Q1E7R6YXV4RFZKS", + "turnId": "turn_01M0X71YKXS1YG2BC2F4ZP8DE1", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "They've stopped, so I should respect that and not introduce anything new. I'll do a final sweep and wrap up with a summary, note any gaps or assumptions, and confirm we're on for next week.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_sweep", + "toolCallId": "toolu_013gVphA3fva6xuP624tUbGD", + "state": "output-available", + "input": {}, + "output": { + "status": "refused", + "refusal": { + "code": "evidence-quote-not-found", + "excerpt": "jams badly enough to stop the run", + "message": "No user entry contains the verbatim quote \"jams badly enough to stop the run\". Repair the quote to match the user's words exactly." + } + }, + "durationMs": 142365 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "I should use their actual words instead — they described it as \"every week or two,\" ranging from once every three weeks at the low end to twice a week at the high end.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "That bounce was my own phrase, not yours — \"jams badly enough to stop the run\" was my wording. Re-anchoring on what you actually said.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_sweep", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01AhAypUknSd3LHrMi8wTivx", + "state": "output-available", + "input": {}, + "output": { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-1a240192-8179-4339-815e-3775a062e986", + "capture-85062afa-e82d-46ce-b609-f7ed16f8b093", + "capture-2c3fa15f-551b-4380-a3b3-8dbc6334a9bb", + "capture-41269bfb-9040-4d54-a113-a94c09f6f2f0", + "capture-f7ea7c88-4d40-48e7-84e5-2b12ebc5ea8e", + "capture-dcb22f82-5927-447e-a35a-4ff18d16ce26", + "capture-0e8d50b2-4222-4129-a619-09c5612c05c5", + "capture-117f9832-aaba-473a-9411-6fd4022388f2", + "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c", + "capture-875ed21b-d257-48fe-867b-6785abf6abb7", + "capture-06d48b41-86fb-48c0-b3e0-59012ba81960", + "capture-428e3931-676d-4af5-a30c-d7a31ea0d8ad", + "capture-ecd3c093-8f6b-4a48-a1fc-d2775d4dbc1f", + "capture-c6339dee-036e-47cb-9dcf-42fc22d38aae", + "capture-2bc071c4-2919-4ff3-910a-92d872eeaef2", + "capture-6ec49aac-c165-4e2b-a937-bed3c8c51c2c", + "capture-c3f03d77-6760-4b3b-99e5-b78d119a352f", + "capture-4cdad6ac-6cd9-46d4-b3ea-62401019ae14", + "capture-83e1381a-f2df-4713-a2f6-f11d034c2fd4", + "capture-95cbfe20-605f-4218-9076-0f4816ebadfa", + "capture-1a5a8343-7367-416e-b760-c7e8f587fe25", + "capture-bf2e57a3-bda7-4090-92ca-af63e0c7a248", + "capture-aec8ff27-3e3f-45d2-9142-b6dc2b5d88a3", + "capture-9d59a385-a8ae-410a-a13d-a4bca3dde9a3", + "capture-4b22a066-a97c-4329-8513-cbd85edd8d65", + "capture-63fabb67-24c4-4bee-926f-17917300c8f4", + "capture-b1e5ded4-79d6-4ff4-bd0d-6386509efba9", + "capture-147c2765-6bfb-4da0-9df9-b74a1c1049de", + "capture-ec5740e7-5068-4222-ad24-8396f5975657", + "capture-2884cc84-c616-4227-860a-d6b55a06c13d", + "capture-0548a680-8da8-47e9-ad72-fb1e264fac80", + "capture-8c6a716b-e09a-4977-94d9-f28ab74be7c4", + "capture-a67683fd-0f34-4838-b48e-aa01f657a511", + "capture-1b632a29-f1de-48e5-8f96-a5ef908c4a56", + "capture-9926552e-289f-4b4a-bc99-4cae34f1720a", + "capture-06aac0a9-b270-4b13-a54f-37440769d685", + "capture-94948329-18e7-42fe-9538-a84fd72c225d", + "capture-16b9c643-8b17-490e-bfe0-022a06efd914", + "capture-5ae45290-5d13-4f2b-b24b-82c66d3d48af", + "capture-821e00ef-6923-43b0-955b-3ed7d60ce127", + "capture-6da3fa16-460b-4f07-aefc-f941d7118f76", + "capture-731a5768-edc7-4858-ad42-50d2faf4b181", + "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026", + "capture-07cb7ca9-27c5-4395-bc9e-aaebc5811382", + "capture-882fa9a2-3a16-46df-90b7-d5ab8ee1dce2", + "capture-b6c2c920-801d-4858-b2c7-64c13ebfc5b1", + "capture-a0429a34-1145-458d-bada-32d827d68959" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [], + "advisories": [ + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-0b2046b4-55c8-4ce3-abac-296d6abe469d", + "capture-95cbfe20-605f-4218-9076-0f4816ebadfa" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-07de77cc-9de8-41e9-92f6-8fe06a6263c9", + "capture-16b9c643-8b17-490e-bfe0-022a06efd914" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-551ab6a6-2f47-4514-ad0b-f5995ef609b2", + "capture-5ae45290-5d13-4f2b-b24b-82c66d3d48af" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e0f39723-a7e5-4656-a8fb-0e2b50bb82da", + "capture-a67683fd-0f34-4838-b48e-aa01f657a511" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b2c62684-e1ee-4d7f-b616-0ceb17a7282e", + "capture-821e00ef-6923-43b0-955b-3ed7d60ce127" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c74bc46d-649f-4e44-a48d-3a005dc44a7e", + "capture-4cdad6ac-6cd9-46d4-b3ea-62401019ae14" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-dd037a1c-63c0-47b8-8886-81c6d1f70226", + "capture-ecd3c093-8f6b-4a48-a1fc-d2775d4dbc1f" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae", + "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae", + "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c", + "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c", + "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-663aaa9f-2bcb-4e01-937f-9d16ce860e80", + "capture-882fa9a2-3a16-46df-90b7-d5ab8ee1dce2" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-addb8fe4-ac6f-4c59-a6be-12d60d197a53", + "capture-5ae45290-5d13-4f2b-b24b-82c66d3d48af" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-bf082835-a2ca-4279-80e5-726f157270bd", + "capture-6ec49aac-c165-4e2b-a937-bed3c8c51c2c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-d509546d-b9bb-4b3b-b82d-a65b02b2f5dc", + "capture-6da3fa16-460b-4f07-aefc-f941d7118f76" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b0a7a08e-c528-4592-ba81-e6026b3f356a", + "capture-821e00ef-6923-43b0-955b-3ed7d60ce127" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-9dfaeda1-b5ff-4581-9c8b-d487fe7b9277", + "capture-882fa9a2-3a16-46df-90b7-d5ab8ee1dce2" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b0908788-ec79-4481-b056-1fa606930f85", + "capture-b6c2c920-801d-4858-b2c7-64c13ebfc5b1" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-225430d9-ae4d-4ef7-b439-6f9b1ccd50c5", + "capture-dcb22f82-5927-447e-a35a-4ff18d16ce26" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e9bb0ea0-9052-4006-96ad-c166a1d3a957", + "capture-4cdad6ac-6cd9-46d4-b3ea-62401019ae14" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c8f57cec-d8f5-42c0-9b99-29a1a71eab73", + "capture-1a5a8343-7367-416e-b760-c7e8f587fe25" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-97bc8f2b-2070-4c8a-8af4-7233caeef498", + "capture-4b22a066-a97c-4329-8513-cbd85edd8d65" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-1f732daa-9626-420c-980f-5c2b88d9bff3", + "capture-94948329-18e7-42fe-9538-a84fd72c225d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-5548a18b-9f79-4475-a9ab-83a74c750721", + "capture-147c2765-6bfb-4da0-9df9-b74a1c1049de" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-6d66bc49-da1a-49e3-8d98-e5d732b6e4bb", + "capture-b6c2c920-801d-4858-b2c7-64c13ebfc5b1" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-46d37104-fb87-4105-95d5-4448aade81ac", + "capture-882fa9a2-3a16-46df-90b7-d5ab8ee1dce2" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4be8c533-88e3-4f97-bcef-9b445cfeb3e6", + "capture-dcb22f82-5927-447e-a35a-4ff18d16ce26" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-35f88f0f-1e4e-44a3-9d47-33c6942a9b16", + "capture-94948329-18e7-42fe-9538-a84fd72c225d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4e68a0cf-eccb-4b69-91f0-c7fb74a2b639", + "capture-4cdad6ac-6cd9-46d4-b3ea-62401019ae14" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b3079749-c23b-4ade-ac51-9bbff19806fb", + "capture-821e00ef-6923-43b0-955b-3ed7d60ce127" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e7d9cbf7-5a12-4e04-8fbf-b2b0581efa5d", + "capture-6da3fa16-460b-4f07-aefc-f941d7118f76" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a7cac8dd-02ea-4fc2-9b07-981ba2152a06", + "capture-4cdad6ac-6cd9-46d4-b3ea-62401019ae14" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473", + "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473", + "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006", + "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006", + "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-0958f3c5-59f7-4139-8942-fc5204d9d5dc", + "capture-4b22a066-a97c-4329-8513-cbd85edd8d65" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-d7faeb42-3fb6-4e39-a4db-a4c0fb8430f1", + "capture-94948329-18e7-42fe-9538-a84fd72c225d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-9b796f7a-c77b-45a7-83f7-806c40aaf58f", + "capture-5ae45290-5d13-4f2b-b24b-82c66d3d48af" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-3fec05b6-fd93-4759-9598-7870f4f98d7f", + "capture-821e00ef-6923-43b0-955b-3ed7d60ce127" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-091d909a-fbcd-4630-bc2d-97bca63e4c7b", + "capture-6da3fa16-460b-4f07-aefc-f941d7118f76" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c858f8bf-b62f-41ac-8b6c-bf1ca8c5d44a", + "capture-882fa9a2-3a16-46df-90b7-d5ab8ee1dce2" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-7d24a8e1-6236-41bd-ab99-3a1036c5b993", + "capture-b6c2c920-801d-4858-b2c7-64c13ebfc5b1" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c", + "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026" + ] + } + ], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "0028ff75065b59b1", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 44, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 0028ff75065b59b1 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 56 node(s) from 228 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"who or what performs it\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- … and 32 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n41 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + }, + "durationMs": 154331 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "I should wrap up honestly here—confirming next week works, avoiding new topics, and clearly laying out what we have, the gaps, and the assumptions I'm making, while being upfront that I can't hand over a runnable model yet.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Go — and yes, same time next week works. Here's where we got to, so you can correct anything when you're back at a desk. **The model is not finished and I'm not going to pretend it is; I wouldn't hand this to your tooling yet.**\n\n## What's on record, in your words\n\n**The two questions the model exists to answer**\n1. \"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"\n2. \"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\"\n\n**What \"better\" means** — Meridian-style on-time is a hard line, \"not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross.\" Below that line you weigh washdown hours, whether the bumped order slides and by how much, and who the customer is. No formula; judgment on who can absorb the slip.\n\n**The flow** — demand book line item out of ERP → you allocate to a line and a week slot → mix, mill, tint, fill (tint \"barely there\" for a white) → QA hold → release, warehouse, ship against due date.\n\n**The line, both ways** — on the sheet, one row, one order occupies Line 2 mix-to-fill. Physically, separate kit with small holding tanks between, and the crew will start the next mix if there's tank room. Both recorded; neither averaged away.\n\n**Run times, clean of breakdowns** — white on Line 2: typical 8–9 h, bad-but-clean 9–10 h, good day ~6 h. Same order on Line 1: add 50–60%, so typical 13–14 h, best ~10 h. Tints: 8–10 h typical on *either* line, no big gap — which you flagged as unexplained and sheet-derived. The 12–13 h figure has been pulled out as breakdown, not run.\n\n**Filler jam** — every week or two; low once in three weeks, high twice a week. Repair typical 30–45 min, quick one-in-ten 10–15 min, bad one-in-ten 4–5 h, \"occasionally eating the rest of the shift.\"\n\n**Washdown** — tint-to-white, three hours, direction matters, plus ramp scrap you don't have numbers for.\n\n## Gaps, with where they'd come from\n- Stage-level rates per line — historian, never pulled apart.\n- Tank sizes, mill-to-fill on Line 1 — engineering drawings.\n- Jam repair times, properly — maintenance work orders in the CMMS.\n- Ramp scrap after washdown — you said it shouldn't be ignored; no source named yet.\n- Whether the tank matters differently by SKU — your own new thought, unexamined.\n- QA hold: \"a few hours for a white,\" and a longer \"specialty wait\" you mentioned but I never asked about.\n- How orders arrive into the demand book — never asked.\n- The \"who can absorb the slip\" rule — I have distributor-shrugs and prickly-account, not a rule I could apply without you.\n\n## Assumptions ledger\n1. That the four stages are the same four for every product — you said \"same four stages every product goes through,\" so this is yours, not mine, but it's load-bearing enough to re-check.\n2. Nothing else. Where I was tempted to fill in — jam rate before you gave it, washdown scrap, stage rates — it's in the gaps list instead.\n\nBoth objectives are still formally unsupported: I have the plant detail and the questions, but haven't yet wired which pieces each answer depends on tightly enough for the tooling. That plus the ramp scrap and the slip rule are what I'd open with next week.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTBYN0NFRENNUUtEWkozMzIxM1hTMUUw", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X7CEDCMQKDZJ33213XS1E0", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Looks right — that's a fair record, and yeah, next week let's start with ramp scrap and the slip rule, since those feel like the ones I could actually go dig up or nail down between now and then. I'll ask maintenance for the CMMS numbers on the filler too while I'm at it. Go on, get to your huddle — wait, that's me. See you next week.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X7CN402JVB8ATB7XBRY0PM", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X7CEDCMQKDZJ33213XS1E0", + "turnId": "turn_01M0X7CEEJGA9FA73FAKXB1SDQ", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Enjoy the huddle.\n\nThree things I'll have ready for next week, so you don't have to hold them:\n\n1. **Ramp scrap and the slip rule** first, as you asked — for the slip rule I'll come at it through a case rather than a principle, so have in mind the last time you bumped someone's order and it turned out to be the wrong someone.\n2. **CMMS filler numbers** — when you get them, what I want is the same shape you gave me from memory: typical, bad one-in-ten, quick one-in-ten. If the work orders disagree with your 30–45 minutes, that disagreement is worth more to the model than either figure alone, so don't reconcile it before you bring it.\n3. **The tint parity puzzle** — that Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed with no explanation. It's the loose thread most likely to be the same thing as your tank hunch, and I'd like to pull on it once the scrap and slip rule are in.\n\nNothing needs doing beyond that. See you next week.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The session has closed with the user's confirmation of the read-back — their \"looks right\" is agreement, not new capture, but their own commitments in the tail (digging up ramp scrap and the slip rule, asking maintenance for CMMS numbers) are genuine deferral deposits worth capturing. This is settled — time to sweep.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The tail has settled: the read-back was confirmed, the session closed, and the expert's last message adds content in their own words — what they'll dig up before next time and that they'll pull the CMMS numbers from maintenance. That belongs in the record as deferral deposits, not as agreement to my summary.\n\nOne caution I'll carry into the sweep: \"Looks right\" is assent to my phrasing, not origination. It closes nothing that wasn't already sourced to their words.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "brunch_sweep", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01TCGhYry4UzwpGQKMAGwEWr", + "state": "output-available", + "input": {}, + "output": { + "status": "applied", + "appliedCaptureIds": [ + "capture-48033ee8-f7eb-4615-b21f-018837fc9c5e", + "capture-88da9925-d922-48c3-8ea0-2c631df3ae3d", + "capture-f53d8f62-375e-4af6-9aaa-fb903839993c", + "capture-ac435640-eea2-4ad6-9695-8e5408b4d852", + "capture-f5a658db-c8ec-4ca0-8a87-3ad252dee56d", + "capture-618842bb-d23d-4371-ae57-73e5257ba215", + "capture-538fb022-2495-46bb-8661-8e1f38c802bf", + "capture-ec8c16b7-d4c0-46fa-a64d-63a23fa37b98", + "capture-5d5f862f-c18c-4501-b544-76735d28e004", + "capture-7f6b8be1-6336-465f-8e11-36a5277d51bd", + "capture-1a83c9c6-a8f8-4ece-a5d4-53b81bf8cc9b", + "capture-e6ae51ed-e1f6-45f3-aab1-c4bca2a979e8", + "capture-c2d2a972-d139-43a7-80c2-50108d92f7a7", + "capture-6c277c9b-2362-4158-8a3b-e069ff0c9a01", + "capture-7f9ac97e-375b-4de3-bbcd-b65e5c7427a6", + "capture-66fbb371-91b7-41db-b437-5bd207d08aed", + "capture-8da19d62-c082-41f6-ac55-f28afe266a8c", + "capture-995374a1-2d25-4690-8397-b342f46ebf02", + "capture-3cc84392-4ed4-4804-8a7c-db07d384a8b2", + "capture-289ac648-e939-4e62-ad46-a17b112402d4", + "capture-5376c084-3889-476f-adab-b09a038ded28", + "capture-b9dfddf9-52d8-433e-81b8-5611e7356c34", + "capture-27ae8fdf-c227-4160-a1a5-e85530156938", + "capture-7bd393bf-3f05-4aa1-b15a-968c293b076f", + "capture-ef41e72f-3126-4003-82b2-686b5f8bfdfb", + "capture-4fa34ba3-82e3-4a4a-ad28-362765a40046", + "capture-2f670377-be1e-4275-9e46-24dd13316300", + "capture-9dc62989-7db7-4e58-baf1-b9ed0400d9a2", + "capture-b92eccd9-e2ad-41a9-abce-bb1cf8b3c328", + "capture-55e95600-febe-4c98-8859-a56eb23ab156", + "capture-29c03a62-4be2-4dc2-852e-bfeab6770f1b", + "capture-9f708103-e43a-4766-bca4-cb3b7060fdcd", + "capture-fdecb081-5b4a-4c7b-b11d-e0d780df210c", + "capture-c9379f74-4d1e-41c6-b1bf-a53c9d8fb64d", + "capture-12e575e7-b7a9-472d-b165-308334ae7513", + "capture-bc9d210e-beb9-4f7a-aa5d-243950605a2a", + "capture-90a38599-7f1b-46ed-9352-d3dd3566b338", + "capture-d889a88e-b7be-4055-9da1-e64f9fc858b0", + "capture-173c6d39-090f-49a7-9e38-c8998003718b" + ], + "skippedDedupKeys": [ + "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"\\\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"\\\\\\\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + ], + "advisories": [ + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-76159984-4b11-446f-a707-bc8302ef0b1d", + "capture-f53d8f62-375e-4af6-9aaa-fb903839993c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-b42a88f7-65b8-4f76-833d-18f39111ec49", + "capture-55e95600-febe-4c98-8859-a56eb23ab156" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-caeeeb12-a91f-46a0-88c2-a622d4d30c55", + "capture-90a38599-7f1b-46ed-9352-d3dd3566b338" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-cbe1db57-3beb-4e48-9ef4-d81d638fa94a", + "capture-c2d2a972-d139-43a7-80c2-50108d92f7a7" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-585f76f6-e841-4ef2-94df-036e711ebce8", + "capture-12e575e7-b7a9-472d-b165-308334ae7513" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-551ab6a6-2f47-4514-ad0b-f5995ef609b2", + "capture-fdecb081-5b4a-4c7b-b11d-e0d780df210c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c74bc46d-649f-4e44-a48d-3a005dc44a7e", + "capture-6c277c9b-2362-4158-8a3b-e069ff0c9a01" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ee79fe32-58f7-4a71-8c15-61f2fedc0a11", + "capture-12e575e7-b7a9-472d-b165-308334ae7513" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-addb8fe4-ac6f-4c59-a6be-12d60d197a53", + "capture-fdecb081-5b4a-4c7b-b11d-e0d780df210c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-3e2a5a8a-bd99-4642-afcf-f9d3dfe2e9f6", + "capture-1a83c9c6-a8f8-4ece-a5d4-53b81bf8cc9b" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-e9bb0ea0-9052-4006-96ad-c166a1d3a957", + "capture-6c277c9b-2362-4158-8a3b-e069ff0c9a01" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-f8e69ae7-6d72-4e37-9b53-b67b47115db5", + "capture-66fbb371-91b7-41db-b437-5bd207d08aed" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-2a491098-b602-4b46-bbaa-439e291027db", + "capture-c2d2a972-d139-43a7-80c2-50108d92f7a7" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c4aefe40-a022-4990-96a1-b74243850715", + "capture-8da19d62-c082-41f6-ac55-f28afe266a8c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c8f57cec-d8f5-42c0-9b99-29a1a71eab73", + "capture-5376c084-3889-476f-adab-b09a038ded28" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-97bc8f2b-2070-4c8a-8af4-7233caeef498", + "capture-27ae8fdf-c227-4160-a1a5-e85530156938" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-1f732daa-9626-420c-980f-5c2b88d9bff3", + "capture-c9379f74-4d1e-41c6-b1bf-a53c9d8fb64d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-2afae8eb-1155-4b07-9842-971df47a6a7d", + "capture-12e575e7-b7a9-472d-b165-308334ae7513" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-f1eca8a3-a2c2-4d92-a428-763c67e7b02a", + "capture-538fb022-2495-46bb-8661-8e1f38c802bf" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-f1eca8a3-a2c2-4d92-a428-763c67e7b02a", + "capture-ec8c16b7-d4c0-46fa-a64d-63a23fa37b98" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-823c9593-db42-45eb-9515-937e6b90bd33", + "capture-8da19d62-c082-41f6-ac55-f28afe266a8c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c27fb36e-eb7f-42be-b6ef-c5dd9e9283e2", + "capture-538fb022-2495-46bb-8661-8e1f38c802bf" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-c27fb36e-eb7f-42be-b6ef-c5dd9e9283e2", + "capture-ec8c16b7-d4c0-46fa-a64d-63a23fa37b98" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-5755b52c-e250-4fae-9c9b-ac6eba42d092", + "capture-c2d2a972-d139-43a7-80c2-50108d92f7a7" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ce789325-dd40-4b21-a936-73485ccb90b9", + "capture-b92eccd9-e2ad-41a9-abce-bb1cf8b3c328" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-526685d5-3021-40f4-8cb9-a4e8d92002b7", + "capture-55e95600-febe-4c98-8859-a56eb23ab156" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-35f88f0f-1e4e-44a3-9d47-33c6942a9b16", + "capture-c9379f74-4d1e-41c6-b1bf-a53c9d8fb64d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a3d8c0b7-97bf-443d-aa86-8fef8ea0bd5a", + "capture-12e575e7-b7a9-472d-b165-308334ae7513" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4e68a0cf-eccb-4b69-91f0-c7fb74a2b639", + "capture-6c277c9b-2362-4158-8a3b-e069ff0c9a01" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-a7cac8dd-02ea-4fc2-9b07-981ba2152a06", + "capture-6c277c9b-2362-4158-8a3b-e069ff0c9a01" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4c582a37-42ed-4d72-a3dd-5a15a6048a23", + "capture-66fbb371-91b7-41db-b437-5bd207d08aed" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4043a577-c1b4-44c3-91f3-2194def82bd9", + "capture-8da19d62-c082-41f6-ac55-f28afe266a8c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-0958f3c5-59f7-4139-8942-fc5204d9d5dc", + "capture-27ae8fdf-c227-4160-a1a5-e85530156938" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-d7faeb42-3fb6-4e39-a4db-a4c0fb8430f1", + "capture-c9379f74-4d1e-41c6-b1bf-a53c9d8fb64d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-9b796f7a-c77b-45a7-83f7-806c40aaf58f", + "capture-fdecb081-5b4a-4c7b-b11d-e0d780df210c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-1a240192-8179-4339-815e-3775a062e986", + "capture-48033ee8-f7eb-4615-b21f-018837fc9c5e" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4cdad6ac-6cd9-46d4-b3ea-62401019ae14", + "capture-6c277c9b-2362-4158-8a3b-e069ff0c9a01" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-83e1381a-f2df-4713-a2f6-f11d034c2fd4", + "capture-7f9ac97e-375b-4de3-bbcd-b65e5c7427a6" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-1a5a8343-7367-416e-b760-c7e8f587fe25", + "capture-5376c084-3889-476f-adab-b09a038ded28" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-4b22a066-a97c-4329-8513-cbd85edd8d65", + "capture-27ae8fdf-c227-4160-a1a5-e85530156938" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-ec5740e7-5068-4222-ad24-8396f5975657", + "capture-4fa34ba3-82e3-4a4a-ad28-362765a40046" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-0548a680-8da8-47e9-ad72-fb1e264fac80", + "capture-9dc62989-7db7-4e58-baf1-b9ed0400d9a2" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-94948329-18e7-42fe-9538-a84fd72c225d", + "capture-c9379f74-4d1e-41c6-b1bf-a53c9d8fb64d" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-5ae45290-5d13-4f2b-b24b-82c66d3d48af", + "capture-fdecb081-5b4a-4c7b-b11d-e0d780df210c" + ] + }, + { + "type": "possibly-equivalent", + "reason": "same-evidence", + "captureIds": [ + "capture-538fb022-2495-46bb-8661-8e1f38c802bf", + "capture-ec8c16b7-d4c0-46fa-a64d-63a23fa37b98" + ] + } + ], + "completion": { + "complete": false, + "revision": "26a8219a17118558", + "pluginVersion": "sdcpn/2026-08-25.2", + "unsatisfied": 46, + "unmapped": [], + "cue": "The harness folded the model at revision 26a8219a17118558 (plugin sdcpn/2026-08-25.2): 69 node(s) from 267 active capture(s). Complete: no.\n\nUnsatisfied, in file order:\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:wait or shift when Line 2 goes down depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:where Line 1 loses its time depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option actually loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [unsupported-active-objective] objective:which option loses less depends on nothing the model contains; an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how long it takes\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\" on activity:filler jam has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [unaddressed] \"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [unaddressed] \"whether its quantities vary by type\" has not been addressed on activity:filler jam.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it needs before it can start\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- [open-conflict] \"what it produces or changes\" on activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill has competing active captures; an explicit, user-cited resolution must close it.\n- … and 34 more.\n\nPatterns whose trigger may apply (discretionary):\n- P01 on activity:filler jam: occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread.\n- P02 on activity:filler jam: ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert \"unknown\" into a value.\n- P08 on activity:filler jam: record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one.\n- P05 on entity-type:line: ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document.\n- P07 on entity-type:line: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record \"no\" as a value; it is load-bearing.\n- P04 on policy:who can absorb the slip: replace any time-shaped approximation (\"about two days before\") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable.\n\n53 node(s) lie outside every objective's dependency slice and are recorded but not demanded.\n\nCompletion is computed from the model, never from the conversation; it does not decide whether to continue. Choose the next question, or none." + } + }, + "durationMs": 128526 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The session's over now, so I'll note this for next time: those five objective nodes really boil down to just two distinct questions, duplicated through repeated rephrasing, and none of them carry real dependencies. That's something worth reviewing and cleaning up going forward.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Swept and folded — the session's record is durable. Since you've gone, this is a note-to-self for next week rather than anything you need to read now.\n\n**State of the model:** 69 nodes from 267 captures. Not complete, and two things about *how it's held* need fixing before more content goes in:\n\n1. **Objective duplication.** Your two questions have landed as five objective nodes — successive rephrasings of the same two (\"which option loses less\", \"which option actually loses less\", \"wait or shift when Line 2 goes down\" are one question; \"where Line 1 loses its time\" and \"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\" are the other). That's an artefact of my asking you to restate them, not a fact about your plant. Consolidating is a review-and-revise job, and it needs your word on which phrasing is yours, not my merge.\n\n2. **Nothing is wired to the objectives.** 53 of the 69 nodes sit outside every objective's dependency slice — recorded, but not demanded by anything. That's why the completion report keeps growing without the model getting more answerable. You *did* tell me what the disruption question hangs on: the run being protected, Line 1's state and family, the jam duration, the ramp scrap, and the bumped order's identity. I have those as prose in your answer; they aren't yet linked as dependencies. Doing that link properly is the first thing that makes any of the plant detail count.\n\n3. **Three open conflicts** on the filler jam node and the production-run node, where later answers superseded earlier ones — the 12–13 h that turned out to be breakdown, and the two jam descriptions. Those need your explicit word to close, not my inference about which you meant.\n\nSo next week's order: ramp scrap and the slip rule as you asked, then the objective wiring, then the conflict closes. The tint parity thread stays third.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X7CTET9RVN9FFHJH8C93AE", + "role": "system", + "purpose": "dispatch", + "display": "diagnostic", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X7CEDCMQKDZJ33213XS1E0", + "signal": { + "tagName": "settlement-check" + }, + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The harness computed this unswept conversation tail:\n\n[non-user] The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nThinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it jam badly enough to stop the run — is that a once-a-week thing, a couple of times a month, once a quarter? Give me a low and high rather than one figure. And then, separately, when it does stop: how long is a typical repair, how long is the one-in-ten bad one, and how long is the one-in-ten quick one?\n[assistant] That bounce was my own phrase, not yours — \"jams badly enough to stop the run\" was my wording. Re-anchoring on what you actually said.Go — and yes, same time next week works. Here's where we got to, so you can correct anything when you're back at a desk. **The model is not finished and I'm not going to pretend it is; I wouldn't hand this to your tooling yet.**\n\n## What's on record, in your words\n\n**The two questions the model exists to answer**\n1. \"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"\n2. \"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\"\n\n**What \"better\" means** — Meridian-style on-time is a hard line, \"not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross.\" Below that line you weigh washdown hours, whether the bumped order slides and by how much, and who the customer is. No formula; judgment on who can absorb the slip.\n\n**The flow** — demand book line item out of ERP → you allocate to a line and a week slot → mix, mill, tint, fill (tint \"barely there\" for a white) → QA hold → release, warehouse, ship against due date.\n\n**The line, both ways** — on the sheet, one row, one order occupies Line 2 mix-to-fill. Physically, separate kit with small holding tanks between, and the crew will start the next mix if there's tank room. Both recorded; neither averaged away.\n\n**Run times, clean of breakdowns** — white on Line 2: typical 8–9 h, bad-but-clean 9–10 h, good day ~6 h. Same order on Line 1: add 50–60%, so typical 13–14 h, best ~10 h. Tints: 8–10 h typical on *either* line, no big gap — which you flagged as unexplained and sheet-derived. The 12–13 h figure has been pulled out as breakdown, not run.\n\n**Filler jam** — every week or two; low once in three weeks, high twice a week. Repair typical 30–45 min, quick one-in-ten 10–15 min, bad one-in-ten 4–5 h, \"occasionally eating the rest of the shift.\"\n\n**Washdown** — tint-to-white, three hours, direction matters, plus ramp scrap you don't have numbers for.\n\n## Gaps, with where they'd come from\n- Stage-level rates per line — historian, never pulled apart.\n- Tank sizes, mill-to-fill on Line 1 — engineering drawings.\n- Jam repair times, properly — maintenance work orders in the CMMS.\n- Ramp scrap after washdown — you said it shouldn't be ignored; no source named yet.\n- Whether the tank matters differently by SKU — your own new thought, unexamined.\n- QA hold: \"a few hours for a white,\" and a longer \"specialty wait\" you mentioned but I never asked about.\n- How orders arrive into the demand book — never asked.\n- The \"who can absorb the slip\" rule — I have distributor-shrugs and prickly-account, not a rule I could apply without you.\n\n## Assumptions ledger\n1. That the four stages are the same four for every product — you said \"same four stages every product goes through,\" so this is yours, not mine, but it's load-bearing enough to re-check.\n2. Nothing else. Where I was tempted to fill in — jam rate before you gave it, washdown scrap, stage rates — it's in the gaps list instead.\n\nBoth objectives are still formally unsupported: I have the plant detail and the questions, but haven't yet wired which pieces each answer depends on tightly enough for the tooling. That plus the ramp scrap and the slip rule are what I'd open with next week.\n[user] Looks right — that's a fair record, and yeah, next week let's start with ramp scrap and the slip rule, since those feel like the ones I could actually go dig up or nail down between now and then. I'll ask maintenance for the CMMS numbers on the filler too while I'm at it. Go on, get to your huddle — wait, that's me. See you next week.\n\nJudge whether this range has settled. If it has, call brunch_sweep. Declining is legal; continue the interview when the topic is still open.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTBYN0hSRzVCTlhCOERQMThGQlZaUFdR", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X7HRG5BNXB8DP18FBVZPWQ", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*[No response — this final message is addressed to the interviewer's own note-taking process, not to Marta. Staying in character as Marta, there is nothing here that calls for a reply; she has already left for the huddle.]*", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X7HYVCKNG7WPQ3SQTCKRNN", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X7HRG5BNXB8DP18FBVZPWQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M0X7HRHNXMKH4B8VC1PGQNTZ", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "No reply is needed here, so I'll just close things out simply without opening a new topic or asking anything.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Session closed. Nothing further pending on Marta's side.\n\nFinal state for the record: model at revision `26a8219a17118558` — 69 nodes, 267 active captures, not complete. Two objectives (held as five duplicate nodes), both formally unsupported. Deferrals carry deposits: CMMS for jam repair times, historian for stage rates, engineering drawings for tank sizes, Marta herself for ramp scrap and the slip rule. Assumption ledger holds one entry, flagged for re-check.\n\nI make no claim that this projects, compiles, or runs. Next session opens as review-and-revise on the objective nodes before any new elicitation.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "This tail has no actual expert content to sweep — just a stage direction, not Marta's words about the plant. Declining seems right here; there's nothing capturable in this range anyway, so leaving it unswept is harmless.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Declining this one.\n\nThe range contains no expert testimony. It is my own closing turn, my own sweep-judgment note, and my own state-of-the-model note, terminated by a stage direction confirming Marta has left and is not replying. The only entry in user position is that stage direction — narration about the interview, not Marta's words about her plant.\n\nSweeping it could only do one of two things: extract nothing, or extract something from a non-expert source. The second is the failure mode I've been guarding against all session — a model element with no expert span behind it. My own summary of the model is not evidence for the model; that would be assent taken as origin, with me on both sides of it.\n\nThe substantive content in that stretch — the CMMS follow-up, the ramp-scrap and slip-rule priority, Marta's confirmation of the read-back — was already swept from her actual message at revision `26a8219a17118558`. Nothing is at risk of being lost by leaving this tail unswept.\n\nThe swept high-water mark stays where it is. The session's durable record is complete as of that revision, and next session opens as review-and-revise on the duplicated objective nodes.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M0X7J3K3R09V3EER3R7MQC0V", + "role": "system", + "purpose": "dispatch", + "display": "diagnostic", + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X7HRG5BNXB8DP18FBVZPWQ", + "signal": { + "tagName": "settlement-check" + }, + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The harness computed this unswept conversation tail:\n\n[assistant] Enjoy the huddle.\n\nThree things I'll have ready for next week, so you don't have to hold them:\n\n1. **Ramp scrap and the slip rule** first, as you asked — for the slip rule I'll come at it through a case rather than a principle, so have in mind the last time you bumped someone's order and it turned out to be the wrong someone.\n2. **CMMS filler numbers** — when you get them, what I want is the same shape you gave me from memory: typical, bad one-in-ten, quick one-in-ten. If the work orders disagree with your 30–45 minutes, that disagreement is worth more to the model than either figure alone, so don't reconcile it before you bring it.\n3. **The tint parity puzzle** — that Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed with no explanation. It's the loose thread most likely to be the same thing as your tank hunch, and I'd like to pull on it once the scrap and slip rule are in.\n\nNothing needs doing beyond that. See you next week.The tail has settled: the read-back was confirmed, the session closed, and the expert's last message adds content in their own words — what they'll dig up before next time and that they'll pull the CMMS numbers from maintenance. That belongs in the record as deferral deposits, not as agreement to my summary.\n\nOne caution I'll carry into the sweep: \"Looks right\" is assent to my phrasing, not origination. It closes nothing that wasn't already sourced to their words.Swept and folded — the session's record is durable. Since you've gone, this is a note-to-self for next week rather than anything you need to read now.\n\n**State of the model:** 69 nodes from 267 captures. Not complete, and two things about *how it's held* need fixing before more content goes in:\n\n1. **Objective duplication.** Your two questions have landed as five objective nodes — successive rephrasings of the same two (\"which option loses less\", \"which option actually loses less\", \"wait or shift when Line 2 goes down\" are one question; \"where Line 1 loses its time\" and \"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\" are the other). That's an artefact of my asking you to restate them, not a fact about your plant. Consolidating is a review-and-revise job, and it needs your word on which phrasing is yours, not my merge.\n\n2. **Nothing is wired to the objectives.** 53 of the 69 nodes sit outside every objective's dependency slice — recorded, but not demanded by anything. That's why the completion report keeps growing without the model getting more answerable. You *did* tell me what the disruption question hangs on: the run being protected, Line 1's state and family, the jam duration, the ramp scrap, and the bumped order's identity. I have those as prose in your answer; they aren't yet linked as dependencies. Doing that link properly is the first thing that makes any of the plant detail count.\n\n3. **Three open conflicts** on the filler jam node and the production-run node, where later answers superseded earlier ones — the 12–13 h that turned out to be breakdown, and the two jam descriptions. Those need your explicit word to close, not my inference about which you meant.\n\nSo next week's order: ramp scrap and the slip rule as you asked, then the objective wiring, then the conflict closes. The tint parity thread stays third.\n[non-user] The harness computed this unswept conversation tail:\n\n[non-user] The immediately preceding user message is mechanically bound as the reply to this pending affordance:\n\nThinking of the Line 2 filler specifically: roughly how often does it jam badly enough to stop the run — is that a once-a-week thing, a couple of times a month, once a quarter? Give me a low and high rather than one figure. And then, separately, when it does stop: how long is a typical repair, how long is the one-in-ten bad one, and how long is the one-in-ten quick one?\n[assistant] That bounce was my own phrase, not yours — \"jams badly enough to stop the run\" was my wording. Re-anchoring on what you actually said.Go — and yes, same time next week works. Here's where we got to, so you can correct anything when you're back at a desk. **The model is not finished and I'm not going to pretend it is; I wouldn't hand this to your tooling yet.**\n\n## What's on record, in your words\n\n**The two questions the model exists to answer**\n1. \"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"\n2. \"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\"\n\n**What \"better\" means** — Meridian-style on-time is a hard line, \"not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross.\" Below that line you weigh washdown hours, whether the bumped order slides and by how much, and who the customer is. No formula; judgment on who can absorb the slip.\n\n**The flow** — demand book line item out of ERP → you allocate to a line and a week slot → mix, mill, tint, fill (tint \"barely there\" for a white) → QA hold → release, warehouse, ship against due date.\n\n**The line, both ways** — on the sheet, one row, one order occupies Line 2 mix-to-fill. Physically, separate kit with small holding tanks between, and the crew will start the next mix if there's tank room. Both recorded; neither averaged away.\n\n**Run times, clean of breakdowns** — white on Line 2: typical 8–9 h, bad-but-clean 9–10 h, good day ~6 h. Same order on Line 1: add 50–60%, so typical 13–14 h, best ~10 h. Tints: 8–10 h typical on *either* line, no big gap — which you flagged as unexplained and sheet-derived. The 12–13 h figure has been pulled out as breakdown, not run.\n\n**Filler jam** — every week or two; low once in three weeks, high twice a week. Repair typical 30–45 min, quick one-in-ten 10–15 min, bad one-in-ten 4–5 h, \"occasionally eating the rest of the shift.\"\n\n**Washdown** — tint-to-white, three hours, direction matters, plus ramp scrap you don't have numbers for.\n\n## Gaps, with where they'd come from\n- Stage-level rates per line — historian, never pulled apart.\n- Tank sizes, mill-to-fill on Line 1 — engineering drawings.\n- Jam repair times, properly — maintenance work orders in the CMMS.\n- Ramp scrap after washdown — you said it shouldn't be ignored; no source named yet.\n- Whether the tank matters differently by SKU — your own new thought, unexamined.\n- QA hold: \"a few hours for a white,\" and a longer \"specialty wait\" you mentioned but I never asked about.\n- How orders arrive into the demand book — never asked.\n- The \"who can absorb the slip\" rule — I have distributor-shrugs and prickly-account, not a rule I could apply without you.\n\n## Assumptions ledger\n1. That the four stages are the same four for every product — you said \"same four stages every product goes through,\" so this is yours, not mine, but it's load-bearing enough to re-check.\n2. Nothing else. Where I was tempted to fill in — jam rate before you gave it, washdown scrap, stage rates — it's in the gaps list instead.\n\nBoth objectives are still formally unsupported: I have the plant detail and the questions, but haven't yet wired which pieces each answer depends on tightly enough for the tooling. That plus the ramp scrap and the slip rule are what I'd open with next week.\n[user] Looks right — that's a fair record, and yeah, next week let's start with ramp scrap and the slip rule, since those feel like the ones I could actually go dig up or nail down between now and then. I'll ask maintenance for the CMMS numbers on the filler too while I'm at it. Go on, get to your huddle — wait, that's me. See you next week.\n\nJudge whether this range has settled. If it has, call brunch_sweep. Declining is legal; continue the interview when the topic is still open.\n[user] *[No response — this final message is addressed to the interviewer's own note-taking process, not to Marta. Staying in character as Marta, there is nothing here that calls for a reply; she has already left for the huddle.]*\n\nJudge whether this range has settled. If it has, call brunch_sweep. Declining is legal; continue the interview when the topic is still open.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X5XEJYQZ5ZBVWMDPKY2Q9T", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M0X5XEJYQZ5ZBVWMDPKY2Q9T" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X5XSXP0MK5YBNG911C3W1D", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M0X5XSXP0MK5YBNG911C3W1D" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X5Y87AS5RZE428EV0MW6D4", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M0X5Y87AS5RZE428EV0MW6D4" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6267D8KT3M5AQ9A505Y8S", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M0X6267D8KT3M5AQ9A505Y8S" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X65ARARS7NTPXGE1GHQAKG", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M0X65ARARS7NTPXGE1GHQAKG" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X65VJMBBQAE3GGR7AVF2PM", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M0X65VJMBBQAE3GGR7AVF2PM" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6K12Q1K9D3G60FBJW5GWR", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M0X6K12Q1K9D3G60FBJW5GWR" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6QCS99QQY0E2CAE391TX2", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M0X6QCS99QQY0E2CAE391TX2" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X6WZ30XA35YR6J5T6HFMBN", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M0X6WZ30XA35YR6J5T6HFMBN" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X71YK52Q1E7R6YXV4RFZKS", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M0X71YK52Q1E7R6YXV4RFZKS" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X7CEDCMQKDZJ33213XS1E0", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M0X7CEDCMQKDZJ33213XS1E0" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M0X7HRG5BNXB8DP18FBVZPWQ", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M0X7HRG5BNXB8DP18FBVZPWQ" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M0X5XEJYXDCKKMY6DCFTQ7AX" + }, + "store": { + "captures": [ + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Stated as the decision the model must settle: given a line-down event with unknown ETA, which of the available scheduling options loses less.", + "assertion": { + "value": "When a line goes down with ETA unknown, be able to enter that state and have the model say which option — wait out the repair, or move the order to the other line — actually loses less, instead of the scheduler doing gut math at the huddle." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a6ad400e-463a-4e08-80e5-1b5448355f62", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"When a line goes down with ETA unknown, be able to enter that state and have the model say which option — wait out the repair, or move the order to the other line — actually loses less, instead of the scheduler doing gut math at the huddle.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as the decision the model must settle: given a line-down event with unknown ETA, which of the available scheduling options loses less.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'd love to type in \\\\\\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\\\\\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert gave a lexicographic scorecard with an explicit refusal of a formula for the second tier.", + "assertion": { + "value": "First and non-negotiable: days late on the Meridian order, where anything above zero is bad. Below that, weighed together with no formula: washdown hours, and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — with judgment applied to who the customer is and who can absorb the slip (a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem)." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \"cross the line\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \"how bad is bad\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-76159984-4b11-446f-a707-bc8302ef0b1d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"First and non-negotiable: days late on the Meridian order, where anything above zero is bad. Below that, weighed together with no formula: washdown hours, and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — with judgment applied to who the customer is and who can absorb the slip (a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem).\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert gave a lexicographic scorecard with an explicit refusal of a formula for the second tier.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \\\\\\\"cross the line\\\\\\\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \\\\\\\"how bad is bad\\\\\\\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The scorecard names the washdown, the line-down event, and the orders with their due dates and customers as what the answer is computed from.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "activity:tint-to-white washdown", + "activity:Line 2 filler jam", + "entity-type:order", + "entity-type:line" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-3f2444d5-8001-46d9-8a92-c85f8c6f8d6a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"activity:tint-to-white washdown\",\"activity:Line 2 filler jam\",\"entity-type:order\",\"entity-type:line\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The scorecard names the washdown, the line-down event, and the orders with their due dates and customers as what the answer is computed from.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "number", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert gave a single figure, not a spread; the low/high and typical are not yet on record.", + "assertion": { + "value": "three hours" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b42a88f7-65b8-4f76-833d-18f39111ec49", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"three hours\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Expert gave a single figure, not a spread; the low/high and typical are not yet on record.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert stated the outcome as consuming crew time and blocking the line for the window.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Consumes crew time and takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window; afterwards the line is in white rather than tint." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-053410a5-6574-4355-aabf-dd972f0088e1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Consumes crew time and takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window; afterwards the line is in white rather than tint.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert stated the outcome as consuming crew time and blocking the line for the window.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Stated as the consequence of pulling a line off a tint run to run a white order; the full precondition list was not elicited.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line currently running a tint that is to be switched to a white order — pulling Line 1 off its tint run to cover Meridian white incurs the washdown." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-e86ee1d3-dbbd-4e2d-b1c0-a8ac719f0e58", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line currently running a tint that is to be switched to a white order — pulling Line 1 off its tint run to cover Meridian white incurs the washdown.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as the consequence of pulling a line off a tint run to run a white order; the full precondition list was not elicited.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "precision": "number", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Loss named for the tint-to-white transition specifically, as a single figure plus crew time; other transitions were not yet asked about.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours of the line plus crew time for the tint-to-white transition; the bumped order may itself go late as a knock-on." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-04d27279-48f8-437e-8688-14c400f3f0f1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours of the line plus crew time for the tint-to-white transition; the bumped order may itself go late as a knock-on.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Loss named for the tint-to-white transition specifically, as a single figure plus crew time; other transitions were not yet asked about.\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "Line 2 filler jam", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert described two kinds of repair — half an hour and half a shift — and one observed instance of about two hours; quantiles not yet elicited.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Repairs come in a \"half hour\" kind and a \"half a shift\" kind; the recent instance came back in about two hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7d1cb932-a1d6-4e1a-86a7-984a9d53af80", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Repairs come in a \\\"half hour\\\" kind and a \\\"half a shift\\\" kind; the recent instance came back in about two hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"Line 2 filler jam\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Expert described two kinds of repair — half an hour and half a shift — and one observed instance of about two hours; quantiles not yet elicited.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "Line 2 filler jam", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The event takes the line out of production and puts the order sitting on it at risk, forcing a wait-or-move decision.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Line 2 stops producing until repaired (half a shift lost in the recent case); the order sitting on Line 2 is at risk of its due date, forcing a decision to wait out the repair or shift the order to Line 1." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2, and I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-330b99df-25fc-4d38-b1f9-6f8da955b79e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Line 2 stops producing until repaired (half a shift lost in the recent case); the order sitting on Line 2 is at risk of its due date, forcing a decision to wait out the repair or shift the order to Line 1.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"Line 2 filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The event takes the line out of production and puts the order sitting on it at risk, forcing a wait-or-move decision.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2, and I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "Meridian ships on time, full stop", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Stated as an absolute the scheduler protects ahead of all other considerations.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The Meridian order ships on time, full stop; it is not traded off against washdown hours or other orders' due dates." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-caeeeb12-a91f-46a0-88c2-a622d4d30c55", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The Meridian order ships on time, full stop; it is not traded off against washdown hours or other orders' due dates.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"Meridian ships on time, full stop\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as an absolute the scheduler protects ahead of all other considerations.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "Meridian ships on time, full stop", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert named the sole override in general terms; the practiced test for \"no way through\" is not yet on record.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Only when there is truly no way through; otherwise nothing overrides it." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I use judgment on who can absorb the slip", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-422d7f74-a119-45d6-8261-3c71b50af7f7", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Only when there is truly no way through; otherwise nothing overrides it.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"Meridian ships on time, full stop\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert named the sole override in general terms; the practiced test for \\\"no way through\\\" is not yet on record.\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I use judgment on who can absorb the slip\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Orders are treated apart by colour class (white vs tint, which drives washdown) and by customer class (distributor / small account / awkward account that gets prickly).", + "assertion": { + "value": "Orders differ by colour class — white versus tint, which decides whether a washdown is incurred — and by customer, sorted into a distributor (sliding two days is a shrug), a small account (sliding a week is fine), and an awkward account that gets prickly." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer, because a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-f2a03b6c-0420-48a7-85be-bdcb3536a6f7", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Orders differ by colour class — white versus tint, which decides whether a washdown is incurred — and by customer, sorted into a distributor (sliding two days is a shrug), a small account (sliding a week is fine), and an awkward account that gets prickly.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Orders are treated apart by colour class (white vs tint, which drives washdown) and by customer class (distributor / small account / awkward account that gets prickly).\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer, because a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Each order is spoken of as carrying a due date, a customer, a colour, and the line it is sitting on.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Its due date (e.g. due Thursday), its customer (e.g. Meridian), its colour (white or tint), and which line it is sitting on." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-c9ac976a-3eef-4a77-8e29-3598b184b450", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Its due date (e.g. due Thursday), its customer (e.g. Meridian), its colour (white or tint), and which line it is sitting on.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Each order is spoken of as carrying a due date, a customer, a colour, and the line it is sitting on.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Line 1 and Line 2 named; whether these are the only lines has not been asked.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Line 1 and Line 2 named so far; total count not yet confirmed." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair. Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-6bc324a5-2e12-4070-8275-fdfe819923e6", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Line 1 and Line 2 named so far; total count not yet confirmed.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Line 1 and Line 2 named; whether these are the only lines has not been asked.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair. Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "A line is spoken of as carrying what it is currently running (its colour state) and whether it is down.", + "assertion": { + "value": "What it is currently running — e.g. mid-run on a tint, which sets the colour it would have to be washed down from — and whether it is jammed/down awaiting repair." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-b003fc51-0ade-4721-b400-b7b68edf8c60", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"What it is currently running — e.g. mid-run on a tint, which sets the colour it would have to be washed down from — and whether it is jammed/down awaiting repair.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"A line is spoken of as carrying what it is currently running (its colour state) and whether it is down.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option loses less", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Stated as the concrete decision support the model must give, anchored to the Line 2 filler jam incident.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Given a disruption in progress (e.g. \"filler's down, ETA unknown\"), which of the available scheduling options — wait out the repair on the down line, or move the order to another line — actually loses less, decided in the moment instead of by gut math at the huddle." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a0a0bd7a-32fe-47e3-a2f4-8a452fe769bc", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Given a disruption in progress (e.g. \\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\"), which of the available scheduling options — wait out the repair on the down line, or move the order to another line — actually loses less, decided in the moment instead of by gut math at the huddle.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as the concrete decision support the model must give, anchored to the Line 2 filler jam incident.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'd love to type in \\\\\\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\\\\\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option loses less", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert explicitly denies having a weighting formula; the ordering is stated, the weights are not.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Lexicographic: first, days late on the hard-line order (Meridian) — yes/no, anything above zero is bad; below that, weigh washdown hours against whether the bumped order goes late and by how much, and who the customer is. No formula for the second-order trade-off — \"how bad is bad\", judged by who can absorb the slip." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \"cross the line\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \"how bad is bad\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-de512bde-aa52-4147-933f-81439aa5ec6d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Lexicographic: first, days late on the hard-line order (Meridian) — yes/no, anything above zero is bad; below that, weigh washdown hours against whether the bumped order goes late and by how much, and who the customer is. No formula for the second-order trade-off — \\\"how bad is bad\\\", judged by who can absorb the slip.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert explicitly denies having a weighting formula; the ordering is stated, the weights are not.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \\\\\\\"cross the line\\\\\\\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \\\\\\\"how bad is bad\\\\\\\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option loses less", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The scorecard names on-time delivery, washdown hours, lateness of the bumped order, and the repair outcome; the judgment of who can absorb a slip is the tiebreaker.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "constraint:Meridian on time", + "activity:tint-to-white washdown", + "activity:filler jam", + "entity-type:order", + "entity-type:line", + "policy:who can absorb the slip" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late. If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a6e8dc50-fffb-494d-8bd2-59704c0427e4", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"constraint:Meridian on time\",\"activity:tint-to-white washdown\",\"activity:filler jam\",\"entity-type:order\",\"entity-type:line\",\"policy:who can absorb the slip\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option loses less\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The scorecard names on-time delivery, washdown hours, lateness of the bumped order, and the repair outcome; the judgment of who can absorb a slip is the tiebreaker.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late. If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Colour class changes the process at the tint stage; customer type changes how lateness is weighed.", + "assertion": { + "value": "An order is a line item in the demand book from ERP. Treated apart by: product colour class — white (tint stage is barely there, a pass-through rather than a real letdown step) versus tint/specialty; and by customer type — distributor (a two-day slide is a shrug), small account (a week is fine), and awkward accounts that get prickly." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "because a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3cb49f42-f479-4b67-be4c-22c8f9771f6e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"An order is a line item in the demand book from ERP. Treated apart by: product colour class — white (tint stage is barely there, a pass-through rather than a real letdown step) versus tint/specialty; and by customer type — distributor (a two-day slide is a shrug), small account (a week is fine), and awkward accounts that get prickly.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Colour class changes the process at the tint stage; customer type changes how lateness is weighed.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"because a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Named directly as what the demand-book line item carries, extended by the allocation step and the account-based lateness judgment.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Quantity, due date, SKU; plus the line and week-slot it has been allocated to on the sheet; plus the customer/account it belongs to." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-5628ca29-5985-4005-aa3f-a6885dc38223", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU; plus the line and week-slot it has been allocated to on the sheet; plus the customer/account it belongs to.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Named directly as what the demand-book line item carries, extended by the allocation step and the account-based lateness judgment.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Lines are contended for between orders in the decision described.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Production lines, referred to individually as Line 1 and Line 2; an order is allocated to a specific line and a line can be mid-run on another order." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair. Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6d4d1074-f6fe-4d4c-95c2-f242a6f98233", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Production lines, referred to individually as Line 1 and Line 2; an order is allocated to a specific line and a line can be mid-run on another order.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Lines are contended for between orders in the decision described.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair. Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Only the two lines involved in the incident were named; the plant's full line count was never asked.", + "assertion": { + "value": "At least two lines named: Line 1 and Line 2. Total line count not stated." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a0b65576-83d8-4134-9fbe-9b059663ae12", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"At least two lines named: Line 1 and Line 2. Total line count not stated.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Only the two lines involved in the incident were named; the plant's full line count was never asked.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"We had a Meridian white order due Thursday sitting on Line 2\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "order flow from demand book to shipment", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Given verbatim as the end-to-end sequence for the Meridian white order.", + "assertion": { + "value": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill (fill and pack) → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if QA and shipping are counted as one, five if split." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-cbe1db57-3beb-4e48-9ef4-d81d638fa94a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill (fill and pack) → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if QA and shipping are counted as one, five if split.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"order flow from demand book to shipment\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Given verbatim as the end-to-end sequence for the Meridian white order.\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Stated as the trigger for the order becoming something to schedule.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line item in the demand book, produced by ERP, carrying quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ee57e45e-a166-490d-ac0c-f5f2ea8c2ded", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line item in the demand book, produced by ERP, carrying quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as the trigger for the order becoming something to schedule.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Directly stated as the outcome of step one.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is slotted onto a specific line and a slot in the week, on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-fa56fa8b-611a-4a38-9a42-1bd038e52d80", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is slotted onto a specific line and a slot in the week, on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Directly stated as the outcome of step one.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "First person throughout; role stated at the outset.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The master scheduler (the expert), working on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 1, + "entryEnd": 1 + }, + "source": "user" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-dba4ec08-0265-420c-95d2-4dce250ae0b6", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The master scheduler (the expert), working on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"First person throughout; role stated at the outset.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":1,\\\"entryStart\\\":1,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Stated as the production step common to all products.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Runs the order through four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack — producing filled and packed product that comes off the fill line." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0b2046b4-55c8-4ce3-abac-296d6abe469d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Runs the order through four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack — producing filled and packed product that comes off the fill line.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as the production step common to all products.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Explicit type-dependence at the tint stage; stage durations themselves not yet given.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes — the stages are the same for every product, but for a white the tint stage is barely there, a pass-through rather than a real letdown step." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-8156b872-b3c2-43db-aa67-56166bebe556", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes — the stages are the same for every product, but for a white the tint stage is barely there, a pass-through rather than a real letdown step.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Explicit type-dependence at the tint stage; stage durations themselves not yet given.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Stated as the precondition and the waiting arrangement.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order has come off the fill line; it then sits in the lab's queue awaiting check." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-585f76f6-e841-4ef2-94df-036e711ebce8", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order has come off the fill line; it then sits in the lab's queue awaiting check.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as the precondition and the waiting arrangement.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Release is the stated outcome of the QA hold.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is checked and then released, after which it goes to the warehouse and ships against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-589bc2db-8fc9-4d65-8024-b34ce4cd736a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is checked and then released, after which it goes to the warehouse and ships against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Release is the stated outcome of the QA hold.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Named as the owner of the queue and the check.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The lab." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-07de77cc-9de8-41e9-92f6-8fe06a6263c9", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The lab.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Named as the owner of the queue and the check.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Hedged quantifier only; not yet a usable spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Usually a few hours for a white; longer for specialty (\"nothing like the specialty wait\"). No figures for typical, one-in-ten worse or one-in-ten better yet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6ca0ba27-000e-4cbd-ae25-39dc7a1c679c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Usually a few hours for a white; longer for specialty (\\\"nothing like the specialty wait\\\"). No figures for typical, one-in-ten worse or one-in-ten better yet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Hedged quantifier only; not yet a usable spread.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Type dependence stated explicitly in the same breath as the duration.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes — a white is usually a few hours, specialty waits are much longer." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-22890cbe-8720-408f-a3c9-fcbfe3826f2b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes — a white is usually a few hours, specialty waits are much longer.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Type dependence stated explicitly in the same breath as the duration.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "release and ship", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Final step of the walkthrough; due date is the reference for the objective's lateness metric.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The released order goes to the warehouse and ships against its due date; lateness is measured as days late against that due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-551ab6a6-2f47-4514-ad0b-f5995ef609b2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The released order goes to the warehouse and ships against its due date; lateness is measured as days late against that due date.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Final step of the walkthrough; due date is the reference for the objective's lateness metric.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Named as the changeover that the tint→white switch forces.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line changing over from a tint run to a white run; the line must be pulled off the tint it is mid-run on." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7df09f81-9c85-43ac-b69e-306d540f8afb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line changing over from a tint run to a white run; the line must be pulled off the tint it is mid-run on.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Named as the changeover that the tint→white switch forces.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "number", + "rationale": "A single figure was given, not a spread; recorded at the precision actually reached.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours (tint-to-white)." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-e0f39723-a7e5-4656-a8fb-0e2b50bb82da", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours (tint-to-white).\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"A single figure was given, not a spread; recorded at the precision actually reached.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "precision": "number", + "rationale": "Loss named for a specific named transition (tint to white); only one figure given.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours of the line's availability — real cost and crew time — during which the line is out of anything else." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d8dffb0f-f148-4af2-ba7e-478a6a1b38c6", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours of the line's availability — real cost and crew time — during which the line is out of anything else.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Loss named for a specific named transition (tint to white); only one figure given.\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Effect on line availability stated directly.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Puts the line into a state able to run white; the line is unavailable for any other work for the duration." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a2938097-b902-4f24-8e15-70f4b8ce95fb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Puts the line into a state able to run white; the line is unavailable for any other work for the duration.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Effect on line availability stated directly.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Described as the disruption that forces the scheduling decision.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The line's filler goes down, stopping the order sitting on that line until the repair completes; the scheduler must then decide to wait it out or shift the order to another line." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-896881a6-c9ec-469f-ab03-4a56b59f6cad", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The line's filler goes down, stopping the order sitting on that line until the repair completes; the scheduler must then decide to wait it out or shift the order to another line.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Described as the disruption that forces the scheduling decision.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "rationale": "Two kinds named as the ends plus one observed instance; no typical or one-in-ten figures given, so this is a range, not a spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "From about half an hour (\"the 'half hour' kind\") to about half a shift (\"the 'half a shift' kind\"); the recent instance came back in about two hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "it came back in about two hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4a3ae53c-2c2f-4664-9499-7e81c254abc5", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"From about half an hour (\\\"the 'half hour' kind\\\") to about half a shift (\\\"the 'half a shift' kind\\\"); the recent instance came back in about two hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Two kinds named as the ends plus one observed instance; no typical or one-in-ten figures given, so this is a range, not a spread.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it came back in about two hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "One occurrence recounted; frequency never stated.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user", + "pointer": "rate of filler jams not yet asked or given" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\"", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d662739b-76f0-429a-829a-ccb79763b6b9", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\",\"pointer\":\"rate of filler jams not yet asked or given\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"One occurrence recounted; frequency never stated.\",\"slot\":\"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'd love to type in \\\\\\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "Meridian on time", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Stated as non-negotiable with a named consequence.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The hard-line customer's order must ship on or before its due date — days late must be zero. The line is not crossed unless there is truly no way through; if it is crossed, the scheduler has to go explain it." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a9e42aa6-8d30-4ded-a8c4-f24220cfb292", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The hard-line customer's order must ship on or before its due date — days late must be zero. The line is not crossed unless there is truly no way through; if it is crossed, the scheduler has to go explain it.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"Meridian on time\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated as non-negotiable with a named consequence.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Given as the practiced basis for weighing knock-on lateness.", + "assertion": { + "value": "When deciding which order to bump, judge by who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; another awkward account that gets prickly creates a second problem to solve the first. Applied by judgment, with no formula." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I use judgment on who can absorb the slip", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b2c62684-e1ee-4d7f-b616-0ceb17a7282e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"When deciding which order to bump, judge by who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; another awkward account that gets prickly creates a second problem to solve the first. Applied by judgment, with no formula.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Given as the practiced basis for weighing knock-on lateness.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I use judgment on who can absorb the slip\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The expert states the model's job as evaluating a disruption response option set.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Given a disruption such as \"filler's down, ETA unknown\", tell me which option (switch the order to the other line, or wait out the repair) actually loses less — instead of gut math at the huddle." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1cb33f48-6553-4e4f-a8a0-37d7631b08ea", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Given a disruption such as \\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\", tell me which option (switch the order to the other line, or wait out the repair) actually loses less — instead of gut math at the huddle.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The expert states the model's job as evaluating a disruption response option set.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'd love to type in \\\\\\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\\\\\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Lexicographic scorecard given in words; the expert explicitly denies having numeric weights.", + "assertion": { + "value": "First and hard: days late on the Meridian-style order, anything above zero is bad. Underneath and traded off by judgement, not formula: washdown hours (crew time plus the line taken out of anything else), and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and for which customer. No formula for the second-order weighting." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I don't have a formula for it.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-f073c3ed-2a89-4499-b3b2-fe160e8c1057", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"First and hard: days late on the Meridian-style order, anything above zero is bad. Underneath and traded off by judgement, not formula: washdown hours (crew time plus the line taken out of anything else), and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and for which customer. No formula for the second-order weighting.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Lexicographic scorecard given in words; the expert explicitly denies having numeric weights.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I don't have a formula for it.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The options the expert weighed name these nodes directly.", + "assertion": { + "value": "activity:filler jam; activity:tint-to-white washdown; entity-type:order; entity-type:line (Line 1 / Line 2); ordering/flow:order flow, allocate to ship; policy:Meridian on time; policy:who can absorb the slip" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-c9864a2c-cbb3-41c9-97a6-e44cc1d7d424", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"activity:filler jam; activity:tint-to-white washdown; entity-type:order; entity-type:line (Line 1 / Line 2); ordering/flow:order flow, allocate to ship; policy:Meridian on time; policy:who can absorb the slip\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The options the expert weighed name these nodes directly.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "where Line 1 loses its time", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Second objective the expert put explicitly in scope.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Show where Line 1 loses its time — specifically whether the small tank between mill and fill is actually costing us — as evidence to take to engineering rather than a hunch." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If the model can actually show me \"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\" that's worth more to me long-term", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-480c2821-4d80-495b-a652-f5de8b035144", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Show where Line 1 loses its time — specifically whether the small tank between mill and fill is actually costing us — as evidence to take to engineering rather than a hunch.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"where Line 1 loses its time\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Second objective the expert put explicitly in scope.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If the model can actually show me \\\\\\\"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\\\\\\\" that's worth more to me long-term\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "where Line 1 loses its time", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The tank hunch is about these nodes.", + "assertion": { + "value": "constraint:small holding tanks between stages; entity-type:stage kit (mix, mill, tint, fill); ordering/flow:stage overlap on a line; constraint:published line rate" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-f3f2c366-eab0-49fa-951c-773f77aa11b2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"constraint:small holding tanks between stages; entity-type:stage kit (mix, mill, tint, fill); ordering/flow:stage overlap on a line; constraint:published line rate\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"where Line 1 loses its time\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The tank hunch is about these nodes.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Distinctions the expert's process treats differently: product class (white vs tint vs specialty) and customer account type.", + "assertion": { + "value": "An order is a line item in the demand book (quantity, due date, SKU). Whites differ from tints (tint stage is a pass-through for a white; a tint-to-white change costs a washdown) and from specialties (QA wait much longer). Customers differ: distributor, small account, and \"awkward\" accounts that get prickly." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3bb35fb7-3954-45d4-839f-20ee46a8c052", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"An order is a line item in the demand book (quantity, due date, SKU). Whites differ from tints (tint stage is a pass-through for a white; a tint-to-white change costs a washdown) and from specialties (QA wait much longer). Customers differ: distributor, small account, and \\\"awkward\\\" accounts that get prickly.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Distinctions the expert's process treats differently: product class (white vs tint vs specialty) and customer account type.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Attributes named on the order.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Quantity, due date, SKU; the line and slot in the week it is allocated to; the customer; and days late against its due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-e552ac87-8cfa-4091-a262-6fba33ab9f83", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU; the line and slot in the week it is allocated to; the customer; and days late against its due date.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Attributes named on the order.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line (Line 1 / Line 2)", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "prescribed", + "rationale": "The scheduling sheet's view of a line as a single indivisible resource.", + "assertion": { + "value": "On the sheet a line is one row, one thing: the order occupies it for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it's done." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \"Line 2\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c74bc46d-649f-4e44-a48d-3a005dc44a7e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"On the sheet a line is one row, one thing: the order occupies it for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it's done.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line (Line 1 / Line 2)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The scheduling sheet's view of a line as a single indivisible resource.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"prescribed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On the sheet, \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line (Line 1 / Line 2)", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Physical reality diverges from the sheet; both recorded on the same node.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Physically a line is not one thing: mix, mill, tint and fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-dd037a1c-63c0-47b8-8886-81c6d1f70226", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Physically a line is not one thing: mix, mill, tint and fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line (Line 1 / Line 2)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Physical reality diverges from the sheet; both recorded on the same node.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line (Line 1 / Line 2)", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Only Line 1 and Line 2 are named; no count was stated.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Line 1 and Line 2 are the lines named; no total count stated." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-6c46c958-82b9-4ba0-bf0f-363fd70b6dbc", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Line 1 and Line 2 are the lines named; no total count stated.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line (Line 1 / Line 2)\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Only Line 1 and Line 2 are named; no count was stated.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "stage kit (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Each stage is separately contended kit.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Four separate pieces of kit per line — mixer, mill, tint, fill head — each usable independently, with small holding tanks buffering between mix/mill and mill/fill." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ee4eb482-b4b3-4392-94d7-ef9dc0a6ca98", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Four separate pieces of kit per line — mixer, mill, tint, fill head — each usable independently, with small holding tanks buffering between mix/mill and mill/fill.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"stage kit (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Each stage is separately contended kit.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "boundary-condition", + "node": "demand book from ERP", + "slot": "the arrival or availability pattern", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Arrival source named; no rate or shape given yet, so precision is only 'named'.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Orders arrive as line items in the demand book when ERP spits it out, each with quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-dd78828b-9d4f-47cd-bad8-90eae84bc4ae", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Orders arrive as line items in the demand book when ERP spits it out, each with quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"boundary-condition\",\"node\":\"demand book from ERP\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Arrival source named; no rate or shape given yet, so precision is only 'named'.\",\"slot\":\"the arrival or availability pattern\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Output of the allocation step.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is placed onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-32521b14-4f1e-41ff-ab95-dfc11d8eee37", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is placed onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Output of the allocation step.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Precondition named.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line item in the demand book from ERP, with quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-711c9600-2f30-4e86-95a2-cc373696e94c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line item in the demand book from ERP, with quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Precondition named.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The expert performs it himself.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The master scheduler (the expert), on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c1704cba-8451-47a5-add8-2e388b330a1f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The master scheduler (the expert), on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The expert performs it himself.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run the batch (mix/mill/tint/fill)", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The production run through the four stages.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is produced through the same four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack — and comes off the fill line." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-68ab39e5-8046-4f93-887e-11ed3e3b1da3", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is produced through the same four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack — and comes off the fill line.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run the batch (mix/mill/tint/fill)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The production run through the four stages.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run the batch (mix/mill/tint/fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "rationale": "The expert says the end-to-end batch time per SKU per line exists on his sheet but gave no figures in this range.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "the expert's scheduling sheet (roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line)" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c6d485c6-0e21-4cc0-b626-9091448d6ba1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"the expert's scheduling sheet (roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line)\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run the batch (mix/mill/tint/fill)\",\"rationale\":\"The expert says the end-to-end batch time per SKU per line exists on his sheet but gave no figures in this range.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run the batch (mix/mill/tint/fill)", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "rationale": "Stage-by-stage durations are not held by the expert; he names the historian as the source.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "the historian (stage-by-stage times: how long does mixing take, how long does milling take)" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "nobody's ever broken that down by \"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-663aaa9f-2bcb-4e01-937f-9d16ce860e80", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"the historian (stage-by-stage times: how long does mixing take, how long does milling take)\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run the batch (mix/mill/tint/fill)\",\"rationale\":\"Stage-by-stage durations are not held by the expert; he names the historian as the source.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"nobody's ever broken that down by \\\\\\\"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\\\\\\\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint stage", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Explicit variation by product type.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes — for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-737200bb-8f75-455f-b90a-3363a30d5fce", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes — for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint stage\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Explicit variation by product type.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Vague quantity as given — 'usually a few hours for a white'; not yet a spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Usually a few hours for a white; the specialty wait is much longer (figure not given)." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-78203b7c-8e00-469c-9d53-01d1a656d5c1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Usually a few hours for a white; the specialty wait is much longer (figure not given).\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Vague quantity as given — 'usually a few hours for a white'; not yet a spread.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Explicit contrast between white and specialty.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes — a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-86a1823e-ea26-45a4-b410-c9ecb6040ea3", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes — a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Explicit contrast between white and specialty.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The lab performs the check.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The lab (the order sits in the lab's queue and gets checked)." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ee79fe32-58f7-4a71-8c15-61f2fedc0a11", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The lab (the order sits in the lab's queue and gets checked).\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The lab performs the check.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "release and ship", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Terminal step.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-addb8fe4-ac6f-4c59-a6be-12d60d197a53", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Terminal step.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "number", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "A single figure given; not a spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-42e0a99d-6cf6-4b30-8199-b430405ba25b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"A single figure given; not a spread.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "precision": "number", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Named mode change (tint to white) with its stated loss.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours of crew time, and the line is out of anything else for that window." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a27c0fc1-57f3-4eed-bea8-15453c84f2da", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours of crew time, and the line is out of anything else for that window.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Named mode change (tint to white) with its stated loss.\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Trigger condition for the changeover.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line that has been running a tint being pulled onto a white." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0f6aea65-d3a4-430b-b532-4f1100303f9e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line that has been running a tint being pulled onto a white.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Trigger condition for the changeover.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Event effect on the line and the order in hand.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The line's filler goes down mid-run with an unknown ETA; the order on it stalls and must either wait or be shifted to the other line." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the tint order I bumped now might itself be late", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a3f706dd-453a-4543-9990-26efb1b079dd", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The line's filler goes down mid-run with an unknown ETA; the order on it stalls and must either wait or be shifted to the other line.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Event effect on the line and the order in hand.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the tint order I bumped now might itself be late\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Two named repair kinds bound the range; the recent instance was about two hours. Not yet a spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "From the \"half hour\" kind to the \"half a shift\" kind; the recent Line 2 jam came back in about two hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "it came back in about two hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-67de2e75-132c-43a7-b64e-412343204931", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"From the \\\"half hour\\\" kind to the \\\"half a shift\\\" kind; the recent Line 2 jam came back in about two hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Two named repair kinds bound the range; the recent instance was about two hours. Not yet a spread.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it came back in about two hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "order flow, allocate to ship", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The end-to-end order stated by the expert.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Allocate the order onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix / mill / tint / fill and pack → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if QA and shipping count as one, five if split." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-bf082835-a2ca-4279-80e5-726f157270bd", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Allocate the order onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix / mill / tint / fill and pack → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if QA and shipping count as one, five if split.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"order flow, allocate to ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The end-to-end order stated by the expert.\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "stage overlap on a line", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Overlap between consecutive orders on the same line, gated by tank space.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Stages can overlap between orders: the mixer may start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, provided the holding tank ahead (mix→mill or mill→fill) has space; the crew will take that head start when the tank ahead has room." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ce28dd53-a53d-4bc9-9956-dc3268c35e3e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Stages can overlap between orders: the mixer may start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, provided the holding tank ahead (mix→mill or mill→fill) has space; the crew will take that head start when the tank ahead has room.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"stage overlap on a line\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Overlap between consecutive orders on the same line, gated by tank space.\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "stage overlap on a line", + "slot": "how a branch or merge is decided", + "rationale": "The expert explicitly does not track how often overlap occurs or is blocked.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9b28544e-b867-4018-9c35-2691cef17a62", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"stage overlap on a line\",\"rationale\":\"The expert explicitly does not track how often overlap occurs or is blocked.\",\"slot\":\"how a branch or merge is decided\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "small holding tanks between stages", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Capacity and consequence stated qualitatively; the sizes themselves are not held by the expert.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The holding tanks between stages are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1. When a tank is full the upstream stage is blocked and mixing has to wait. Actual tank sizes not known to the expert; obtainable from engineering drawings." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4c4af9ea-df1a-4449-adb7-d48fce7eae93", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The holding tanks between stages are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1. When a tank is full the upstream stage is blocked and mixing has to wait. Actual tank sizes not known to the expert; obtainable from engineering drawings.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"small holding tanks between stages\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Capacity and consequence stated qualitatively; the sizes themselves are not held by the expert.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "published line rate", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "prescribed", + "rationale": "Engineering's position, recorded as the prescribed reading.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Engineering's position is that the line rate is what it is regardless of the tanks." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-dabdbb5f-9eca-4afb-ad50-5b381d9dfa4f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Engineering's position is that the line rate is what it is regardless of the tanks.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"published line rate\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Engineering's position, recorded as the prescribed reading.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"sourceRegime\":\"prescribed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "published line rate", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The expert's contrary practiced reading, recorded alongside engineering's.", + "assertion": { + "value": "In practice Line 1 feels sluggish and blocked in ways the published line rate does not account for; the expert suspects the mill-to-fill tank costs more than people admit, but has no proof." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it feels sluggish and blocked in ways I can't pin on the published line rate", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-292e1165-0990-4d17-b6db-153c675fd66c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"In practice Line 1 feels sluggish and blocked in ways the published line rate does not account for; the expert suspects the mill-to-fill tank costs more than people admit, but has no proof.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"published line rate\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The expert's contrary practiced reading, recorded alongside engineering's.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it feels sluggish and blocked in ways I can't pin on the published line rate\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "Meridian on time", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Hard constraint on the scheduling decision.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A Meridian-style order ships on time, full stop; it is not traded off against anything." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d509546d-b9bb-4b3b-b82d-a65b02b2f5dc", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A Meridian-style order ships on time, full stop; it is not traded off against anything.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"Meridian on time\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Hard constraint on the scheduling decision.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "Meridian on time", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Only exception stated.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Only when there is truly no way through." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-54d606d7-8c61-4f0a-bd5f-867bba1af3f7", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Only when there is truly no way through.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"Meridian on time\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Only exception stated.\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Practiced judgement about which customers can take lateness; examples given rather than a formula.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Judgement on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; another awkward account that gets prickly counts as a second problem created to solve the first." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I use judgment on who can absorb the slip", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b0a7a08e-c528-4592-ba81-e6026b3f356a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Judgement on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; another awkward account that gets prickly counts as a second problem created to solve the first.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Practiced judgement about which customers can take lateness; examples given rather than a formula.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I use judgment on who can absorb the slip\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "stage-by-stage times", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Named feed for stage durations.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — the historian." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "nobody's ever broken that down by \"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9dfaeda1-b5ff-4581-9c8b-d487fe7b9277", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — the historian.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"stage-by-stage times\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Named feed for stage durations.\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"nobody's ever broken that down by \\\\\\\"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\\\\\\\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "tank sizes", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Named source for the holding tank capacities.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Holding tank sizes — engineering drawings." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b0908788-ec79-4481-b056-1fa606930f85", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Holding tank sizes — engineering drawings.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"tank sizes\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Named source for the holding tank capacities.\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option loses less", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The model's primary question, stated as a disruption decision: with the filler down and ETA unknown, whether to wait or switch lines.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Given \"filler's down, ETA unknown\", tell me which option actually loses less — wait out the repair, or move the order to the other line — instead of doing gut math at the huddle." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d079be7f-20b9-4bb6-85e8-6ed631cb8057", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Given \\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\", tell me which option actually loses less — wait out the repair, or move the order to the other line — instead of doing gut math at the huddle.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The model's primary question, stated as a disruption decision: with the filler down and ETA unknown, whether to wait or switch lines.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'd love to type in \\\\\\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\\\\\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option loses less", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Lexicographic: on-time delivery for the protected order is a hard line; the remaining terms are weighed by judgment with no formula.", + "assertion": { + "value": "First: days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad news — non-negotiable, a line not crossed unless there is truly no way through. Underneath: washdown hours (crew time plus the line taken out of anything else for that window), and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much, judged against who the customer is. No formula — \"how bad is bad\" and judgment on who can absorb the slip." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \"cross the line\" situation. I don't have a formula for it.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9d5063d7-b9fb-400e-8b54-f618c6fde20e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"First: days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad news — non-negotiable, a line not crossed unless there is truly no way through. Underneath: washdown hours (crew time plus the line taken out of anything else for that window), and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much, judged against who the customer is. No formula — \\\"how bad is bad\\\" and judgment on who can absorb the slip.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Lexicographic: on-time delivery for the protected order is a hard line; the remaining terms are weighed by judgment with no formula.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \\\\\\\"cross the line\\\\\\\" situation. I don't have a formula for it.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option loses less", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The scorecard terms the expert named map onto the washdown, the production run, the breakdown event and the order itself.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "activity:tint-to-white washdown", + "activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "activity:filler jammed", + "entity-type:order", + "policy:who can absorb the slip" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window. And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-3245b29a-3687-4313-97c5-e0455e5889ba", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"activity:tint-to-white washdown\",\"activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"activity:filler jammed\",\"entity-type:order\",\"policy:who can absorb the slip\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option loses less\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The scorecard terms the expert named map onto the washdown, the production run, the breakdown event and the order itself.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'd love to type in \\\\\\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\\\\\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window. And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "where Line 1 loses its time", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Second, explicitly in-scope objective: show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing time, as evidence to take to engineering.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Show where Line 1 loses its time — in particular whether the small holding tank between mill and fill is actually costing us — with something other than a hunch to take to engineering." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If the model can actually show me \"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\" that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-225430d9-ae4d-4ef7-b439-6f9b1ccd50c5", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Show where Line 1 loses its time — in particular whether the small holding tank between mill and fill is actually costing us — with something other than a hunch to take to engineering.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"where Line 1 loses its time\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Second, explicitly in-scope objective: show whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing time, as evidence to take to engineering.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If the model can actually show me \\\\\\\"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\\\\\\\" that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "where Line 1 loses its time", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The hunch is about blocking at the mill-to-fill tank, so it depends on the stage kit, the tank constraint and the run duration.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill", + "constraint:small holding tanks", + "activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "So yes — build it as separate stages if that's what it takes.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-770314e5-f47a-463e-908a-1d8c23ee60f5", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill\",\"constraint:small holding tanks\",\"activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"where Line 1 loses its time\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The hunch is about blocking at the mill-to-fill tank, so it depends on the stage kit, the tank constraint and the run duration.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So yes — build it as separate stages if that's what it takes.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The attributes the scheduler works from on the sheet.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Quantity, due date, SKU; plus the line and week-slot it is allocated to, and the customer account." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6ff1c59a-0664-487b-a946-2680043419a2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU; plus the line and week-slot it is allocated to, and the customer account.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The attributes the scheduler works from on the sheet.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Whites versus tints differ in stage content and in run speed by line; customer type differs in how a slip is judged.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Whites versus tints: for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step, and whites run much faster on Line 2 than Line 1 while tints run at nearly the same speed on both. Customers are treated apart too: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-be0c3675-ae93-41c5-9eaa-7d36d84617cb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Whites versus tints: for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step, and whites run much faster on Line 2 than Line 1 while tints run at nearly the same speed on both. Customers are treated apart too: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Whites versus tints differ in stage content and in run speed by line; customer type differs in how a slip is judged.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "Line 1 and Line 2", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The two lines are contended kit distinguished by speed, and the speed difference depends on product.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Line 1 and Line 2. Line 1 is the slower machine on whites — add maybe fifty, sixty percent to a Line 2 run (\"Line 2 is twice as fast\", which is really a whites number); on tints the two lines run at nearly the same speed." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3e2a5a8a-bd99-4642-afcf-f9d3dfe2e9f6", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Line 1 and Line 2. Line 1 is the slower machine on whites — add maybe fifty, sixty percent to a Line 2 run (\\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\", which is really a whites number); on tints the two lines run at nearly the same speed.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"Line 1 and Line 2\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The two lines are contended kit distinguished by speed, and the speed difference depends on product.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "mix, mill, tint, fill", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "prescribed", + "rationale": "The scheduling sheet's view: the line is one indivisible resource.", + "assertion": { + "value": "On the sheet the line is one row treated as one thing: the order occupies it for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it is done." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \"Line 2\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-e9bb0ea0-9052-4006-96ad-c166a1d3a957", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"On the sheet the line is one row treated as one thing: the order occupies it for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it is done.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"mix, mill, tint, fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The scheduling sheet's view: the line is one indivisible resource.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"prescribed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On the sheet, \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "mix, mill, tint, fill", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The floor view: four separately contended pieces of kit with buffering between them, allowing overlap.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Physically four separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last, if there is room in the holding tank — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-27ee0ed5-50d0-47f6-94b8-77e090bca50f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Physically four separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last, if there is room in the holding tank — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"mix, mill, tint, fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The floor view: four separately contended pieces of kit with buffering between them, allowing overlap.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "mix, mill, tint, fill", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user", + "pointer": "how much overlap happens and how often mixing is blocked by a full tank is not tracked by the scheduler" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-f8e69ae7-6d72-4e37-9b53-b67b47115db5", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\",\"pointer\":\"how much overlap happens and how often mixing is blocked by a full tank is not tracked by the scheduler\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"mix, mill, tint, fill\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "allocate → run → QA hold → release and ship", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The order's life from demand-book line item to shipment, as walked end to end.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill (and pack) → QA hold in the lab's queue → release, go to the warehouse and ship against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-2a491098-b602-4b46-bbaa-439e291027db", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill (and pack) → QA hold in the lab's queue → release, go to the warehouse and ship against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"allocate → run → QA hold → release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The order's life from demand-book line item to shipment, as walked end to end.\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Allocation binds the order to a line and a week slot, which is the scheduling decision under test.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is slotted onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c4aefe40-a022-4990-96a1-b74243850715", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is slotted onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Allocation binds the order to a line and a week slot, which is the scheduling decision under test.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order exists as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits it out, with quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-76c7250e-6575-4e31-b667-113f3a497cce", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order exists as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits it out, with quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order must first be allocated onto a line and a slot in the week." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7da94524-13b5-4c11-a1b4-9cb1b0f07e19", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order must first be allocated onto a line and a slot in the week.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Filled and packed product coming off the fill line, which then goes into QA hold." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c8f57cec-d8f5-42c0-9b99-29a1a71eab73", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Filled and packed product coming off the fill line, which then goes into QA hold.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Sheet-level, mix-to-last-pack, for a Meridian-sized white on Line 2; includes fill-up time getting the line running plus actual throughput. The bad tail is loosely folded-in filler hiccups and QA-adjacent time.", + "assertion": { + "value": "White, normal/Meridian-sized order, Line 2, mix-to-last-pack: typical 8–9 hours; one run in ten worse than 12–13 hours; one run in ten better than about 6 hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Bad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d6985d8d-f85e-4556-a091-df64be080ba6", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"White, normal/Meridian-sized order, Line 2, mix-to-last-pack: typical 8–9 hours; one run in ten worse than 12–13 hours; one run in ten better than about 6 hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"rationale\":\"Sheet-level, mix-to-last-pack, for a Meridian-sized white on Line 2; includes fill-up time getting the line running plus actual throughput. The bad tail is loosely folded-in filler hiccups and QA-adjacent time.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Bad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Same white order on the slower line.", + "assertion": { + "value": "White, same order, Line 1: typical 13–14 hours; worse days pushing 18-plus hours; best day maybe 10 hours — roughly fifty to sixty percent added to the Line 2 figures." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-97bc8f2b-2070-4c8a-8af4-7233caeef498", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"White, same order, Line 1: typical 13–14 hours; worse days pushing 18-plus hours; best day maybe 10 hours — roughly fifty to sixty percent added to the Line 2 figures.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"rationale\":\"Same white order on the slower line.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Only a typical range was given for tints; no one-in-ten tails.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Tint run, either line: 8–10 hours typical. No one-in-ten worse/better figures given." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-04a6f876-12f4-4f53-b6f2-f8e5fa9c87bc", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Tint run, either line: 8–10 hours typical. No one-in-ten worse/better figures given.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Only a typical range was given for tints; no one-in-ten tails.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Duration varies by product type and by line, and the two interact; the expert has no explanation for the tint parity.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes — duration varies both by product (white vs tint) and by line, and the two interact: whites are much slower on Line 1, tints run at nearly the same speed on both. \"I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them.\"" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "That's the \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-592b83e0-ece3-4e98-aedf-cdf70c202e96", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes — duration varies both by product (white vs tint) and by line, and the two interact: whites are much slower on Line 1, tints run at nearly the same speed on both. \\\"I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them.\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Duration varies by product type and by line, and the two interact; the expert has no explanation for the tint parity.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That's the \\\\\\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\\\\\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "precision": "number", + "rationale": "Named transition: tint to white on Line 1.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours for a tint-to-white changeover — real cost in crew time, and it takes the line out of anything else for that window." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-32fe7be9-75c7-464c-87cb-ca38fef4039b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours for a tint-to-white changeover — real cost in crew time, and it takes the line out of anything else for that window.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Named transition: tint to white on Line 1.\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line coming off a tint run and being switched to a white — pulling Line 1 off its tint to cover a white order." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-31556043-9787-40dc-8c0d-b74a47ed3589", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line coming off a tint run and being switched to a white — pulling Line 1 off its tint to cover a white order.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 was mid-run on a tint. If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Only a vague magnitude was given; no typical or tail figures, and the specialty case is named but unquantified.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Usually a few hours for a white; \"nothing like the specialty wait\". No typical/tail figures given." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1f732daa-9626-420c-980f-5c2b88d9bff3", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Usually a few hours for a white; \\\"nothing like the specialty wait\\\". No typical/tail figures given.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Only a vague magnitude was given; no typical or tail figures, and the specialty case is named but unquantified.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "The lab — the order sits in the lab's queue and gets checked." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-2afae8eb-1155-4b07-9842-971df47a6a7d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The lab — the order sits in the lab's queue and gets checked.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jammed", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Two recognised repair kinds bracket the duration; the recent instance fell between them.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Two kinds of repair: the \"half hour\" kind and the \"half a shift\" kind. The most recent Line 2 filler jam came back in about two hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "it came back in about two hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d2d6e303-2f63-478a-ace1-0bf61abbfddd", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Two kinds of repair: the \\\"half hour\\\" kind and the \\\"half a shift\\\" kind. The most recent Line 2 filler jam came back in about two hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jammed\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Two recognised repair kinds bracket the duration; the recent instance fell between them.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it came back in about two hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jammed", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "An event that befalls the line mid-run and forces the switch-or-wait decision.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The line's filler stops mid-run with an unknown ETA, putting the order on it at risk and forcing a decision to wait out the repair or move the order to the other line." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-5548a18b-9f79-4475-a9ab-83a74c750721", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The line's filler stops mid-run with an unknown ETA, putting the order on it at risk and forcing a decision to wait out the repair or move the order to the other line.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jammed\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"An event that befalls the line mid-run and forces the switch-or-wait decision.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The practiced rule for choosing which order gets bumped when two cannot both be on time.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Protect the non-negotiable order's due date; for anything bumped, judge by how far it slips and who the customer is — a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first. No formula; judgment on who can absorb the slip." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1ee7c206-0c56-4d6b-b091-5861f9c40438", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Protect the non-negotiable order's due date; for anything bumped, judge by how far it slips and who the customer is — a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first. No formula; judgment on who can absorb the slip.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The practiced rule for choosing which order gets bumped when two cannot both be on time.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The on-time line is crossed only when there is truly no way through." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4b706f60-c02f-4973-aa58-2d3ded113c39", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The on-time line is crossed only when there is truly no way through.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "small holding tanks", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Consequence is stated (upstream stage waits); the numeric capacity is not held by the expert.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The holding tanks between stages are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1. When a tank is full the upstream stage is blocked and mixing has to wait; overlap is only possible if the tank ahead has space. Suspected to cost more than people admit, never proven." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-97ea5a05-d89c-4a7d-a136-f90526beaa27", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The holding tanks between stages are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1. When a tank is full the upstream stage is blocked and mixing has to wait; overlap is only possible if the tank ahead has space. Suspected to cost more than people admit, never proven.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"small holding tanks\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Consequence is stated (upstream stage waits); the numeric capacity is not held by the expert.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "small holding tanks", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "engineering drawings — tank sizes obtainable from engineering, not carried in the scheduler's head" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6d66bc49-da1a-49e3-8d98-e5d732b6e4bb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"engineering drawings — tank sizes obtainable from engineering, not carried in the scheduler's head\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"small holding tanks\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "stage-by-stage rates from the historian", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Stage-level durations are needed for the separate-stage model and exist only in the historian.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — feed: the plant historian; never pulled apart, not known to the scheduler." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "nobody's ever broken that down by \"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-46d37104-fb87-4105-95d5-4448aade81ac", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — feed: the plant historian; never pulled apart, not known to the scheduler.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"stage-by-stage rates from the historian\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Stage-level durations are needed for the separate-stage model and exist only in the historian.\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"nobody's ever broken that down by \\\\\\\"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\\\\\\\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "validation-criterion", + "node": "the sheet's end-to-end batch times", + "slot": "how the expert would know the model is right", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The only figures the expert holds first-hand are sheet-level end-to-end times per SKU per line; engineering's counter-claim is that the line rate is what it is regardless of the tanks.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The model's end-to-end batch time for a given SKU on each line should match what the scheduler's sheet shows; and it would have to speak to engineering's claim that \"the line rate is what it is regardless\"." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0cdda695-1dfa-43ef-971c-b9db09403a07", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The model's end-to-end batch time for a given SKU on each line should match what the scheduler's sheet shows; and it would have to speak to engineering's claim that \\\"the line rate is what it is regardless\\\".\"},\"kind\":\"validation-criterion\",\"node\":\"the sheet's end-to-end batch times\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The only figures the expert holds first-hand are sheet-level end-to-end times per SKU per line; engineering's counter-claim is that the line rate is what it is regardless of the tanks.\",\"slot\":\"how the expert would know the model is right\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The expert's stated use: type in a disruption state and be told which of switch-or-wait loses less.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Given a disruption like \"filler's down, ETA unknown\", tell me which option actually loses less — shift the order to the other line or wait out the repair — instead of doing gut math at the huddle." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'd love to type in \"filler's down, ETA unknown\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a5926e2a-88e8-459e-a296-282b16d499a8", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Given a disruption like \\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\", tell me which option actually loses less — shift the order to the other line or wait out the repair — instead of doing gut math at the huddle.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The expert's stated use: type in a disruption state and be told which of switch-or-wait loses less.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'd love to type in \\\\\\\"filler's down, ETA unknown\\\\\\\" and have something tell me which option actually loses less, instead of me doing gut math at the huddle with people staring at me.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Hard constraint plus unweighted secondary terms; the expert explicitly denies having a formula.", + "assertion": { + "value": "First number: days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad — on-time is non-negotiable, a line not crossed unless there's truly no way through. Underneath that: washdown hours (crew time, line taken out of anything else for that window) and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and who the customer is. No formula — judgment on who can absorb the slip." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through. So the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \"cross the line\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \"how bad is bad\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ea1779b0-9a83-42aa-92d1-746e73de43cc", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"First number: days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad — on-time is non-negotiable, a line not crossed unless there's truly no way through. Underneath that: washdown hours (crew time, line taken out of anything else for that window) and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and who the customer is. No formula — judgment on who can absorb the slip.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Hard constraint plus unweighted secondary terms; the expert explicitly denies having a formula.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \\\\\\\"cross the line\\\\\\\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \\\\\\\"how bad is bad\\\\\\\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through. So the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "which option actually loses less", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The scorecard terms name the run, the jam, the washdown, the order type and the flow.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "activity:filler jam", + "activity:tint-to-white washdown", + "entity-type:order (line item in the demand book)", + "entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2", + "ordering/flow:allocate → run → QA hold → release and ship", + "policy:who can absorb the slip" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-1288a3df-c7fd-4319-8d4e-a228572ba0b0", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"activity:filler jam\",\"activity:tint-to-white washdown\",\"entity-type:order (line item in the demand book)\",\"entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2\",\"ordering/flow:allocate → run → QA hold → release and ship\",\"policy:who can absorb the slip\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"which option actually loses less\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The scorecard terms name the run, the jam, the washdown, the order type and the flow.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"And then whatever happens to the bumped tint order — does it slide past its own due date, and if so by how much and who's the customer\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "where Line 1 loses its time", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Second in-scope question: whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing time.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Show where Line 1 loses its time — in particular whether the small holding tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is costing more than the published line rate admits, so it can be taken to engineering as something other than a hunch." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If the model can actually show me \"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\" that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4be8c533-88e3-4f97-bcef-9b445cfeb3e6", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Show where Line 1 loses its time — in particular whether the small holding tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is costing more than the published line rate admits, so it can be taken to engineering as something other than a hunch.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"where Line 1 loses its time\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Second in-scope question: whether the small tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is actually costing time.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If the model can actually show me \\\\\\\"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\\\\\\\" that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "where Line 1 loses its time", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The tank question depends on the stage kit and the holding-tank constraint.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill stages", + "constraint:small holding tanks between stages", + "activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So yes — build it as separate stages if that's what it takes.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-bb291ebf-9fe0-4a6e-9840-e7d7fac44033", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill stages\",\"constraint:small holding tanks between stages\",\"activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"where Line 1 loses its time\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The tank question depends on the stage kit and the holding-tank constraint.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So yes — build it as separate stages if that's what it takes.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order (line item in the demand book)", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Whites vs tints differ in the tint stage and in run time by line; customer identity differs in slip tolerance.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Orders are line items with quantity, due date and SKU. Treated apart: whites (tint stage barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step) vs tints (real letdown); and by customer — a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-edfaf81c-c276-4b57-a88c-914953b1c6be", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Orders are line items with quantity, due date and SKU. Treated apart: whites (tint stage barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step) vs tints (real letdown); and by customer — a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order (line item in the demand book)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Whites vs tints differ in the tint stage and in run time by line; customer identity differs in slip tolerance.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order (line item in the demand book)", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Quantity, due date, SKU come from ERP; customer type is used in the slip judgement; line allocation is set at step one.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Quantity, due date, SKU; the customer (distributor / small account / awkward account); which line and week-slot it has been allocated to; whether it has gone late and by how many days." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-13339551-ff3a-414f-8260-e1296530d8ec", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU; the customer (distributor / small account / awkward account); which line and week-slot it has been allocated to; whether it has gone late and by how many days.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order (line item in the demand book)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU come from ERP; customer type is used in the slip judgement; line allocation is set at step one.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "Line 1 and Line 2", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The two lines differ on whites but not on tints — load-bearing for switch-or-wait.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Line 1 and Line 2. Line 1 is the slower machine on whites — add maybe fifty, sixty percent to Line 2's figures (\"Line 2 is twice as fast\", though that's really a whites number). On tints they run at nearly the same speed." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-535749ea-ba99-4d11-84c0-8203fd058329", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Line 1 and Line 2. Line 1 is the slower machine on whites — add maybe fifty, sixty percent to Line 2's figures (\\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\", though that's really a whites number). On tints they run at nearly the same speed.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"Line 1 and Line 2\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The two lines differ on whites but not on tints — load-bearing for switch-or-wait.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "mix, mill, tint, fill stages", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The floor's account: four separately contended pieces of kit per line, buffered by small holding tanks.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, has room." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-79eccb7f-a787-40d4-a2fa-e95bfda82d18", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, has room.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"mix, mill, tint, fill stages\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The floor's account: four separately contended pieces of kit per line, buffered by small holding tanks.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "mix, mill, tint, fill stages", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Stage counts per line and tank sizes not carried by the expert; source named.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "engineering drawings (tank sizes) — expert does not carry them in his head" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I don't have clean numbers for tank sizes or stage-by-stage rates.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3c6b3e85-7fd3-4831-9201-6e3ef525e7cf", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"engineering drawings (tank sizes) — expert does not carry them in his head\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"mix, mill, tint, fill stages\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Stage counts per line and tank sizes not carried by the expert; source named.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I don't have clean numbers for tank sizes or stage-by-stage rates.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "boundary-condition", + "node": "demand book from ERP", + "slot": "the starting state", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Orders enter the scheduler's world as ERP-generated demand-book line items.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Orders arrive as line items in the demand book once ERP spits that out, carrying quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-f1eca8a3-a2c2-4d92-a428-763c67e7b02a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Orders arrive as line items in the demand book once ERP spits that out, carrying quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"boundary-condition\",\"node\":\"demand book from ERP\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Orders enter the scheduler's world as ERP-generated demand-book line items.\",\"slot\":\"the starting state\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Allocation fixes line and week-slot on the sheet.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is slotted onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-823c9593-db42-45eb-9515-937e6b90bd33", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is slotted onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Allocation fixes line and week-slot on the sheet.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The expert himself, as master scheduler, does the slotting on the sheet.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The master scheduler, on the sheet" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 1, + "entryEnd": 1 + }, + "source": "user" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-f7e12936-7567-4b38-be19-a45fb5dc6274", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The master scheduler, on the sheet\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The expert himself, as master scheduler, does the slotting on the sheet.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":1,\\\"entryStart\\\":1,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Allocation follows the ERP demand-book line item existing.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line item in the demand book from ERP, with quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-c27fb36e-eb7f-42be-b6ef-c5dd9e9283e2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line item in the demand book from ERP, with quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Allocation follows the ERP demand-book line item existing.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "allocate → run → QA hold → release and ship", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The expert's own end-to-end sequence for one order.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill (mix, mill, tint, fill and pack) → QA hold in the lab's queue → release, warehouse, and ship against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-5755b52c-e250-4fae-9c9b-ac6eba42d092", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill (mix, mill, tint, fill and pack) → QA hold in the lab's queue → release, warehouse, and ship against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"allocate → run → QA hold → release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The expert's own end-to-end sequence for one order.\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "A run needs the order allocated to a line and that line's kit available.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order must have been allocated onto a line and a slot in the week, and the line's kit (mix, mill, tint, fill) available." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-afd366c9-1ea6-4b73-b2c0-ed97c9af0c79", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order must have been allocated onto a line and a slot in the week, and the line's kit (mix, mill, tint, fill) available.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"A run needs the order allocated to a line and that line's kit available.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Output is finished, packed product that comes off the fill line into QA hold.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is produced through mix, mill, tint, fill and pack; it comes off the fill line as packed product ready for QA hold." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Then it actually has to get produced — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-86fd1cfb-379b-42f7-bdbb-8586dae7f755", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is produced through mix, mill, tint, fill and pack; it comes off the fill line as packed product ready for QA hold.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Output is finished, packed product that comes off the fill line into QA hold.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it actually has to get produced — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The run is performed by whichever line the order is allocated to, with its crew.", + "assertion": { + "value": "entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2 — the line the order is slotted onto, plus its crew" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-90d36431-4341-4f9e-8bf6-8b5354b2fedd", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2 — the line the order is slotted onto, plus its crew\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The run is performed by whichever line the order is allocated to, with its crew.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "First-pass spread for a Meridian-sized white on Line 2, mix-to-last-pack, with breakdowns folded in loosely; superseded by the clean-run capture.", + "assertion": { + "value": "White, Meridian-sized order, Line 2, mix-to-last-pack (includes fill-up time plus throughput): typical eight to nine hours; one in ten worse than twelve to thirteen hours (breakdowns folded in loosely); one in ten better than about six hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size. That includes fill-up time getting the line running plus the actual throughput.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Bad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours, and that's usually not the run itself slowing down, that's more \"the filler hiccupped twice\" or QA-adjacent stuff creeping in, though I'm folding some of that in loosely.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7ef3368b-e678-4c58-b7f9-137d1607d8ec", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"White, Meridian-sized order, Line 2, mix-to-last-pack (includes fill-up time plus throughput): typical eight to nine hours; one in ten worse than twelve to thirteen hours (breakdowns folded in loosely); one in ten better than about six hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"rationale\":\"First-pass spread for a Meridian-sized white on Line 2, mix-to-last-pack, with breakdowns folded in loosely; superseded by the clean-run capture.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Bad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours, and that's usually not the run itself slowing down, that's more \\\\\\\"the filler hiccupped twice\\\\\\\" or QA-adjacent stuff creeping in, though I'm folding some of that in loosely.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size. That includes fill-up time getting the line running plus the actual throughput.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Superseding capture: breakdown time stripped out so filler jams are not double-counted; clean-run variability is small.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Clean run (nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup), white on Line 2: typical eight or nine hours; one in ten worse than nine to ten hours (normal slack, someone slow changing a roll of packaging film); one in ten better than about six hours. The twelve-to-thirteen-hour days are breakdowns showing up inside the run, not the run being slow." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup, nothing — a clean run doesn't really vary that much from typical. Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-10d88b79-af70-4a14-90c1-da56ad526d36", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Clean run (nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup), white on Line 2: typical eight or nine hours; one in ten worse than nine to ten hours (normal slack, someone slow changing a roll of packaging film); one in ten better than about six hours. The twelve-to-thirteen-hour days are breakdowns showing up inside the run, not the run being slow.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"rationale\":\"Superseding capture: breakdown time stripped out so filler jams are not double-counted; clean-run variability is small.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup, nothing — a clean run doesn't really vary that much from typical. Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "P07: run duration varies both by product type and by line, and the two interact.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes. White on Line 1: add maybe fifty, sixty percent to the Line 2 figures — typical thirteen to fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten (this is where \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" comes from, and that's really a whites number). Tints: Line 1 and Line 2 run them at nearly the same speed — eight to ten hours typical on either line. No good reason known for why; it's what the sheet has always shown." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-921611c3-21b5-4ab2-8e56-9b8cdaa2eba2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes. White on Line 1: add maybe fifty, sixty percent to the Line 2 figures — typical thirteen to fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten (this is where \\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\" comes from, and that's really a whites number). Tints: Line 1 and Line 2 run them at nearly the same speed — eight to ten hours typical on either line. No good reason known for why; it's what the sheet has always shown.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"P07: run duration varies both by product type and by line, and the two interact.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert gave two named repair kinds and one recent instance; no quantiles yet, so range not spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Either the \"half hour\" kind or the \"half a shift\" kind of repair; the recent Line 2 instance came back in about two hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6cf8c229-ab84-4448-abc6-3e7f4a76bb4c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Either the \\\"half hour\\\" kind or the \\\"half a shift\\\" kind of repair; the recent Line 2 instance came back in about two hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Expert gave two named repair kinds and one recent instance; no quantiles yet, so range not spread.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The jam halts the line's fill stage and forces the switch-or-wait decision.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The filler stops and the run stalls — the line loses time (half a shift lost in the recent case), the in-progress order's finish is pushed out, and the scheduler must decide whether to shift the order to the other line or wait out the repair." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ce789325-dd40-4b21-a936-73485ccb90b9", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The filler stops and the run stalls — the line loses time (half a shift lost in the recent case), the in-progress order's finish is pushed out, and the scheduler must decide whether to shift the order to the other line or wait out the repair.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The jam halts the line's fill stage and forces the switch-or-wait decision.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "precision": "number", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "P02: named transition (tint to white) with a stated loss; a single figure, not a spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours of washdown — crew time, and it takes the line out of anything else for that window." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1ba32034-be19-432b-a012-326b682fd357", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours of washdown — crew time, and it takes the line out of anything else for that window.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"P02: named transition (tint to white) with a stated loss; a single figure, not a spread.\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Triggered by pulling a line off a tint run to run a white.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line that is mid-run or last-run on a tint being pulled onto a white — the changeover from tint to white." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-526685d5-3021-40f4-8cb9-a4e8d92002b7", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line that is mid-run or last-run on a tint being pulled onto a white — the changeover from tint to white.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Triggered by pulling a line off a tint run to run a white.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "named", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Vague quantifier — \"usually a few hours\" for a white — not yet quantiles; specialty products wait longer.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Usually a few hours for a white; \"nothing like the specialty wait\" — specialty products wait longer (amount not given)." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-35f88f0f-1e4e-44a3-9d47-33c6942a9b16", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Usually a few hours for a white; \\\"nothing like the specialty wait\\\" — specialty products wait longer (amount not given).\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Vague quantifier — \\\"usually a few hours\\\" for a white — not yet quantiles; specialty products wait longer.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "QA check gates release to warehouse and shipping.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The batch is checked and then released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-e28ed067-b6a4-40d8-935a-3598e2401cc1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The batch is checked and then released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"QA check gates release to warehouse and shipping.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The lab holds the queue and does the check.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The lab" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a3d8c0b7-97bf-443d-aa86-8fef8ea0bd5a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The lab\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The lab holds the queue and does the check.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "a line is occupied for the whole run", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "prescribed", + "rationale": "P08: the scheduling sheet's rule, which the expert says lies to him a bit.", + "assertion": { + "value": "On the sheet, a line is one row: the order occupies that line for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it till it's done." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \"Line 2\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4e68a0cf-eccb-4b69-91f0-c7fb74a2b639", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"On the sheet, a line is one row: the order occupies that line for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it till it's done.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"a line is occupied for the whole run\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"P08: the scheduling sheet's rule, which the expert says lies to him a bit.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"prescribed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On the sheet, \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "a line is occupied for the whole run", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "P08 divergence: floor practice overlaps stages when buffer space allows.", + "assertion": { + "value": "On the floor the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space — the mixer can start the next order while the fill head finishes the last one. How much overlap happens, and how often it is blocked because a tank is full, is not tracked." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-cfe5bf57-8879-4592-a938-1527d73c8bac", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"On the floor the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space — the mixer can start the next order while the fill head finishes the last one. How much overlap happens, and how often it is blocked because a tank is full, is not tracked.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"a line is occupied for the whole run\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"P08 divergence: floor practice overlaps stages when buffer space allows.\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The practiced rule for choosing which order to bump; explicitly judgement, not formula.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Judgment on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; another awkward account that gets prickly creates a second problem. No formula — \"how bad is bad\" for the second-order stuff." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I use judgment on who can absorb the slip", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b3079749-c23b-4ade-ac51-9bbff19806fb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Judgment on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; another awkward account that gets prickly creates a second problem. No formula — \\\"how bad is bad\\\" for the second-order stuff.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The practiced rule for choosing which order to bump; explicitly judgement, not formula.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I use judgment on who can absorb the slip\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The hard on-time line overrides the slip-absorption weighing.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The Meridian-style on-time line overrides everything: that order shipping on time is non-negotiable unless there's truly no way through." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-e7d9cbf7-5a12-4e04-8fbf-b2b0581efa5d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The Meridian-style on-time line overrides everything: that order shipping on time is non-negotiable unless there's truly no way through.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The hard on-time line overrides the slip-absorption weighing.\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "small holding tanks between stages", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "named", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Consequence named (mixing has to wait when the tank ahead is full) but the capacities themselves are not held by the expert; source named.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "engineering drawings — tank sizes; consequence as stated: the tanks are small, especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1, and when a tank is full mixing has to wait" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it, and engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-23c5706e-37c1-481e-9438-8fae70973c13", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"engineering drawings — tank sizes; consequence as stated: the tanks are small, especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1, and when a tank is full mixing has to wait\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"small holding tanks between stages\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Consequence named (mixing has to wait when the tank ahead is full) but the capacities themselves are not held by the expert; source named.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it, and engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "stage-by-stage durations from the historian", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Stage-level rates exist as data but not in the expert's head; feed named.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) per SKU and line — feed: the historian. Never pulled apart; only end-to-end batch time per SKU per line is on the scheduling sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet, but nobody's ever broken that down by \"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-00863ee1-f99c-48b2-b680-bf4eb71e6a57", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) per SKU and line — feed: the historian. Never pulled apart; only end-to-end batch time per SKU per line is on the scheduling sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"stage-by-stage durations from the historian\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Stage-level rates exist as data but not in the expert's head; feed named.\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I know roughly how long a batch of a given SKU takes end to end on each line, because that's what's on my sheet, but nobody's ever broken that down by \\\\\\\"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\\\\\\\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "validation-criterion", + "node": "stage rates must come from data, not gut-feel", + "slot": "how the expert would know the model is right", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Expert explicitly bounds what his own testimony can support.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Stage-level rates and tank sizes must not be taken from the expert's gut-feel — he can supply gut-feel and known bottleneck stories, but real numbers must come from the historian and engineering drawings." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Don't assume I can hand you clean stage rates — I can give you gut-feel and known bottleneck stories, but not real numbers off the top of my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-196b8447-3958-444f-9860-8de7330299ec", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Stage-level rates and tank sizes must not be taken from the expert's gut-feel — he can supply gut-feel and known bottleneck stories, but real numbers must come from the historian and engineering drawings.\"},\"kind\":\"validation-criterion\",\"node\":\"stage rates must come from data, not gut-feel\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert explicitly bounds what his own testimony can support.\",\"slot\":\"how the expert would know the model is right\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Don't assume I can hand you clean stage rates — I can give you gut-feel and known bottleneck stories, but not real numbers off the top of my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "switch or wait when Line 2 goes down", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The expert wrote the question as he would type it into the tool.", + "assertion": { + "value": "\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b58883f3-43e2-4626-bc59-a9c091f1d1b5", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"\\\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"switch or wait when Line 2 goes down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The expert wrote the question as he would type it into the tool.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "switch or wait when Line 2 goes down", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The expert listed what the answer hangs on: the protected run and its due date, the state of Line 1, the changeover and its direction, the jam duration, and whose order gets bumped.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "entity-type:order", + "entity-type:line", + "activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "activity:tint-to-white washdown", + "activity:filler jam", + "policy:who can absorb the slip" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way). It hangs on the jam itself", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the bumped order's identity matters, not just \"an order got delayed.\"", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3aa3764b-8dd5-495a-bf3e-b32cbc89ba61", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"entity-type:order\",\"entity-type:line\",\"activity:run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"activity:tint-to-white washdown\",\"activity:filler jam\",\"policy:who can absorb the slip\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"switch or wait when Line 2 goes down\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The expert listed what the answer hangs on: the protected run and its due date, the state of Line 1, the changeover and its direction, the jam duration, and whose order gets bumped.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the bumped order's identity matters, not just \\\\\\\"an order got delayed.\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way). It hangs on the jam itself\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "switch or wait when Line 2 goes down", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert gave a lexicographic hard constraint plus unweighted second-order criteria, explicitly denying a formula.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Hard line: days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad news. Underneath that, weighed by judgment with no formula: washdown hours, and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and for which customer." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \"cross the line\" situation. I don't have a formula for it.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-57ad71c3-f423-4d91-a9f8-d3ce31f1fca1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Hard line: days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad news. Underneath that, weighed by judgment with no formula: washdown hours, and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and for which customer.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"switch or wait when Line 2 goes down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert gave a lexicographic hard constraint plus unweighted second-order criteria, explicitly denying a formula.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \\\\\\\"cross the line\\\\\\\" situation. I don't have a formula for it.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Second question the expert wrote out as he would type it.", + "assertion": { + "value": "\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\"" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1a3325b9-15b6-436a-8e7f-feff95d98036", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"\\\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Second question the expert wrote out as he would type it.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Expert named stage-level rates on Line 1, the tank size between mill and fill, and per-SKU stage differences.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "entity-type:the four stages — mix, mill, tint, fill", + "constraint:small holding tank between mill and fill on Line 1", + "entity-type:order", + "entity-type:line" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "different SKUs are slow at different stages, so the tank might matter a lot for some products and not at all for others", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0e28490a-6b4b-4996-9b6f-3d9249a7d2dc", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"entity-type:the four stages — mix, mill, tint, fill\",\"constraint:small holding tank between mill and fill on Line 1\",\"entity-type:order\",\"entity-type:line\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Expert named stage-level rates on Line 1, the tank size between mill and fill, and per-SKU stage differences.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"different SKUs are slow at different stages, so the tank might matter a lot for some products and not at all for others\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Expert named the fields the order carries from the demand book and the state he consults mid-disruption.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Quantity, due date, SKU; remaining quantity as it runs; the customer it belongs to; how far through it is; which line and slot it is allocated to." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "whose order was it — that's the \"who can absorb it\" judgment call again", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-43c5ef42-68ce-478f-89b0-c552111d807a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU; remaining quantity as it runs; the customer it belongs to; how far through it is; which line and slot it is allocated to.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert named the fields the order carries from the demand book and the state he consults mid-disruption.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"whose order was it — that's the \\\\\\\"who can absorb it\\\\\\\" judgment call again\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The process treats whites and tints differently at the tint stage and in run times; customer type changes how a slip is judged.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Whites versus tints (for a white the tint stage is barely there, a pass-through); and by customer type — distributor, small account, or an awkward account that gets prickly." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ccc2d7eb-8a3f-4684-8f1c-a21a51049550", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Whites versus tints (for a white the tint stage is barely there, a pass-through); and by customer type — distributor, small account, or an awkward account that gets prickly.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The process treats whites and tints differently at the tint stage and in run times; customer type changes how a slip is judged.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "prescribed", + "rationale": "The sheet's representation of a line, which the expert says 'lies to me a bit'.", + "assertion": { + "value": "On the scheduling sheet a line is one row and one resource: an order occupies Line 2 for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it is done." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \"Line 2\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a7cac8dd-02ea-4fc2-9b07-981ba2152a06", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"On the scheduling sheet a line is one row and one resource: an order occupies Line 2 for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it is done.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The sheet's representation of a line, which the expert says 'lies to me a bit'.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"prescribed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On the sheet, \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "the four stages — mix, mill, tint, fill", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The floor's version of the line: four contended stages with buffers, not one resource.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Physically mix, mill, tint and fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head finishes the last one if the tank ahead has space." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a158a5da-be3a-461f-87c0-69c38cac1a72", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Physically mix, mill, tint and fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between; the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head finishes the last one if the tank ahead has space.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"the four stages — mix, mill, tint, fill\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The floor's version of the line: four contended stages with buffers, not one resource.\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "the four stages — mix, mill, tint, fill", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Count of stages is stated; occupancy/blocking frequency is explicitly untracked.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Four stages in series per line — mix, mill, tint, fill — with small holding tanks between them; how often blocking occurs is not tracked." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4c582a37-42ed-4d72-a3dd-5a15a6048a23", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Four stages in series per line — mix, mill, tint, fill — with small holding tanks between them; how often blocking occurs is not tracked.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"the four stages — mix, mill, tint, fill\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Count of stages is stated; occupancy/blocking frequency is explicitly untracked.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Expert's step one.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is slotted onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4043a577-c1b4-44c3-91f3-2194def82bd9", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is slotted onto a line and a slot in the week on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert's step one.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Precondition named in the walkthrough.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line item in the demand book, produced by ERP, carrying quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3a71a4b9-95cd-4d6f-9cff-70db25b37473", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line item in the demand book, produced by ERP, carrying quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Precondition named in the walkthrough.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "boundary-condition", + "node": "demand book from ERP", + "slot": "the starting state", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "External source of work into the scheduling process.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Orders exist as line items in the demand book, each with quantity, due date and SKU, once ERP produces it." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-8f9df889-b24b-49e4-8ae8-6506112e2006", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Orders exist as line items in the demand book, each with quantity, due date and SKU, once ERP produces it.\"},\"kind\":\"boundary-condition\",\"node\":\"demand book from ERP\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"External source of work into the scheduling process.\",\"slot\":\"the starting state\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert corrected his first spread to strip out jams, so the clean-run figure supersedes; no one-in-ten-better figure was given for the clean run.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Meridian-sized white on Line 2, clean run (nothing breaks): typically eight to nine hours mix-to-last-pack; a bad-but-clean day nine to ten hours. Clean-run variability is small; the twelve-to-thirteen-hour bad days are breakdowns showing up inside the run and are modelled separately." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-72d414e6-f6a2-420e-8407-667f41535411", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Meridian-sized white on Line 2, clean run (nothing breaks): typically eight to nine hours mix-to-last-pack; a bad-but-clean day nine to ten hours. Clean-run variability is small; the twelve-to-thirteen-hour bad days are breakdowns showing up inside the run and are modelled separately.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Expert corrected his first spread to strip out jams, so the clean-run figure supersedes; no one-in-ten-better figure was given for the clean run.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Durations vary by line and by white-versus-tint; the Line 1 figures were given before the clean-run/breakdown split and may still fold in stoppages.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes. Same white order on Line 1 is about fifty to sixty percent longer than Line 2 — typical thirteen to fourteen hours, worse days eighteen-plus, best day about ten. Tints run at nearly the same speed on either line, about eight to ten hours typical, with no big gap; the 'Line 2 is twice as fast' rule is really a whites number." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0958f3c5-59f7-4139-8942-fc5204d9d5dc", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes. Same white order on Line 1 is about fifty to sixty percent longer than Line 2 — typical thirteen to fourteen hours, worse days eighteen-plus, best day about ten. Tints run at nearly the same speed on either line, about eight to ten hours typical, with no big gap; the 'Line 2 is twice as fast' rule is really a whites number.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Durations vary by line and by white-versus-tint; the Line 1 figures were given before the clean-run/breakdown split and may still fold in stoppages.\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "run it through mix/mill/tint/fill", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Runs are performed on a named line; the expert compares Line 1 and Line 2 as the performing kit.", + "assertion": { + "value": "One of the two production lines (Line 1 or Line 2) with its crew." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap. I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-53f9387d-f037-4d0f-999b-f89a8f113f46", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"One of the two production lines (Line 1 or Line 2) with its crew.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"run it through mix/mill/tint/fill\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Runs are performed on a named line; the expert compares Line 1 and Line 2 as the performing kit.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap. I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Named performer in the walkthrough.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The lab." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d7faeb42-3fb6-4e39-a4db-a4c0fb8430f1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The lab.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Named performer in the walkthrough.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Only a vague 'few hours' was given; not yet a range or spread.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Usually a few hours for a white; explicitly longer for specialty ('nothing like the specialty wait'), figure not given." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-38e0effa-0fb7-48ff-907c-2fc9f3e64211", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Usually a few hours for a white; explicitly longer for specialty ('nothing like the specialty wait'), figure not given.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Only a vague 'few hours' was given; not yet a range or spread.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "release and ship", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Final step of the walkthrough.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against its due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9b796f7a-c77b-45a7-83f7-806c40aaf58f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against its due date.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Final step of the walkthrough.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "order life on the floor", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Expert's own summary of the end-to-end sequence.", + "assertion": { + "value": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-314d8187-81ba-478c-8f71-1c9e5826965b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"order life on the floor\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Expert's own summary of the end-to-end sequence.\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "number", + "rationale": "Single figure given for the tint-to-white washdown; no spread elicited.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-345fbb5a-c0c1-4e3a-9015-33b3ad727831", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Single figure given for the tint-to-white washdown; no spread elicited.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Changeover is directional and triggered by the family of what was running versus what is coming.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A changeover between product families on the same line; the direction decides the cost — tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-60f6f8c8-f52e-443a-adee-6818339f3b35", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A changeover between product families on the same line; the direction decides the cost — tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Changeover is directional and triggered by the family of what was running versus what is coming.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Stated consequence of the washdown.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The line is cleaned from tint to white and is taken out of anything else for that window; it costs crew time." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-be556841-bf14-4fe0-8c23-ffc773896b2b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The line is cleaned from tint to white and is taken out of anything else for that window; it costs crew time.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Stated consequence of the washdown.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "rationale": "Loss is named and affirmed as material but no quantity is held by the expert.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user", + "pointer": "ramp scrap after the washdown — real product lost on top of the hours; expert has no good numbers" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-26d3ac6c-4b27-4765-baa3-8437f06fe8ca", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\",\"pointer\":\"ramp scrap after the washdown — real product lost on top of the hours; expert has no good numbers\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"rationale\":\"Loss is named and affirmed as material but no quantity is held by the expert.\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Expert gave two named kinds of repair plus one observed instance; no typical or decile figures yet.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Between the 'half hour' kind and the 'half a shift' kind; the recent Line 2 case came back in about two hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-da6d10a4-e0f2-4b1d-8e78-4d58cadeb8f2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Between the 'half hour' kind and the 'half a shift' kind; the recent Line 2 case came back in about two hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Expert gave two named kinds of repair plus one observed instance; no typical or decile figures yet.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Event-shaped activity that befalls the line, distinct from the run itself.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The filler stops mid-run and the line is down for the repair; the run in progress stretches (the twelve-to-thirteen-hour bad days), and the scheduler must decide to wait or shift the order to the other line." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-68f9db28-a002-406d-912a-4cc410e5b380", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The filler stops mid-run and the line is down for the repair; the run in progress stretches (the twelve-to-thirteen-hour bad days), and the scheduler must decide to wait or shift the order to the other line.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Event-shaped activity that befalls the line, distinct from the run itself.\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step", + "rationale": "No rate was stated; recording the gap rather than inferring one from the single incident.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user", + "pointer": "frequency of filler jams was not given; expert spoke only to duration uncertainty at the time of the jam" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "how long is this repair *actually* going to take, which I never know at the time, so really it needs some sense of \"could be quick, could be long\" rather than one number", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0a06d184-bf72-42c4-95b3-7ad88ea4e059", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\",\"pointer\":\"frequency of filler jams was not given; expert spoke only to duration uncertainty at the time of the jam\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"rationale\":\"No rate was stated; recording the gap rather than inferring one from the single incident.\",\"slot\":\"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"how long is this repair *actually* going to take, which I never know at the time, so really it needs some sense of \\\\\\\"could be quick, could be long\\\\\\\" rather than one number\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "The tacit rule for choosing which order to bump; no formula, judged on customer identity and size of slip.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Judgment on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first, so it is protected." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I use judgment on who can absorb the slip", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3fec05b6-fd93-4759-9598-7870f4f98d7f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Judgment on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first, so it is protected.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The tacit rule for choosing which order to bump; no formula, judged on customer identity and size of slip.\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I use judgment on who can absorb the slip\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "rationale": "Hard constraint sitting above the absorb-the-slip judgment.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The protected order's on-time ship date overrides: shipping Meridian on time is a line he won't cross unless there's truly no way through." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-091d909a-fbcd-4630-bc2d-97bca63e4c7b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The protected order's on-time ship date overrides: shipping Meridian on time is a line he won't cross unless there's truly no way through.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Hard constraint sitting above the absorb-the-slip judgment.\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "small holding tank between mill and fill on Line 1", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Qualitative blocking rule stated; the numeric capacity is not available from the expert.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Holding tanks between stages are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1. When there is room, the upstream stage can start the next order's batch; when the tank is full, the upstream stage is blocked and mixing has to wait. Actual tank capacity is not held by the expert; engineering's position is that the line rate is what it is regardless." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it, and engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7111ab55-5d90-44f6-a1d2-4aa1b48da4bb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Holding tanks between stages are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1. When there is room, the upstream stage can start the next order's batch; when the tank is full, the upstream stage is blocked and mixing has to wait. Actual tank capacity is not held by the expert; engineering's position is that the line rate is what it is regardless.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"small holding tank between mill and fill on Line 1\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Qualitative blocking rule stated; the numeric capacity is not available from the expert.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and I've always suspected that one costs us more than people admit, but I've never had anything to prove it, and engineering tells me the line rate is what it is regardless.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "stage-level rates", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Expert named the system where the missing stage-level numbers live.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Stage-by-stage durations/rates (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes, mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1) — feed: the historian." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "nobody's ever broken that down by \"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c858f8bf-b62f-41ac-8b6c-bf1ca8c5d44a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Stage-by-stage durations/rates (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes, mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1) — feed: the historian.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"stage-level rates\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Expert named the system where the missing stage-level numbers live.\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"nobody's ever broken that down by \\\\\\\"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\\\\\\\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "tank sizes", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Named source for a value the expert cannot give.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Holding tank capacities between stages — feed: engineering drawings, obtainable but not carried by the expert." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7d24a8e1-6236-41bd-ab99-3a1036c5b993", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Holding tank capacities between stages — feed: engineering drawings, obtainable but not carried by the expert.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"tank sizes\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Named source for a value the expert cannot give.\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The expert wrote the question as they would type it into the tool.", + "assertion": { + "value": "\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1a240192-8179-4339-815e-3775a062e986", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"\\\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The expert wrote the question as they would type it into the tool.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"\\\\\\\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The expert listed what the answer hangs on.", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "entity-type:order", + "entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2", + "activity:the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "activity:filler jam", + "activity:tint-to-white washdown", + "policy:who can absorb the slip", + "constraint:Meridian ships on time" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "It hangs on the jam itself — how long is this repair *actually* going to take", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "And then the knock-on: whatever gets bumped off Line 1, does it blow its own due date, and whose order was it — that's the \"who can absorb it\" judgment call again.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-85062afa-e82d-46ce-b609-f7ed16f8b093", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"entity-type:order\",\"entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2\",\"activity:the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"activity:filler jam\",\"activity:tint-to-white washdown\",\"policy:who can absorb the slip\",\"constraint:Meridian ships on time\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The expert listed what the answer hangs on.\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"And then the knock-on: whatever gets bumped off Line 1, does it blow its own due date, and whose order was it — that's the \\\\\\\"who can absorb it\\\\\\\" judgment call again.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"It hangs on the jam itself — how long is this repair *actually* going to take\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Hard constraint plus unweighted secondary measures; the expert explicitly denied having a formula.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Meridian on time is non-negotiable (days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad news); underneath that, washdown hours and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much are weighed by judgment — \"I don't have a formula for it.\"" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I don't have a formula for it.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-2c3fa15f-551b-4380-a3b3-8dbc6334a9bb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Meridian on time is non-negotiable (days late on Meridian, anything above zero is bad news); underneath that, washdown hours and whether the bumped order goes late and by how much are weighed by judgment — \\\"I don't have a formula for it.\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"switch or wait when Line 2 goes down mid-run\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Hard constraint plus unweighted secondary measures; the expert explicitly denied having a formula.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I don't have a formula for it.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\"" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\"", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-41269bfb-9040-4d54-a113-a94c09f6f2f0", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"\\\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"\\\\\\\"Is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 actually slowing the line down, or is that just a story I tell myself?\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": [ + "entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill kit and holding tanks", + "entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2", + "entity-type:order", + "ordering/flow:stage overlap on a line" + ] + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "It also probably depends on the product, since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-f7ea7c88-4d40-48e7-84e5-2b12ebc5ea8e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":[\"entity-type:mix, mill, tint, fill kit and holding tanks\",\"entity-type:Line 1 and Line 2\",\"entity-type:order\",\"ordering/flow:stage overlap on a line\"]},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"It also probably depends on the product, since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Qualitative: showing where Line 1 loses its time, in a form usable with engineering.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The model showing \"here's where Line 1 loses its time\" — something to take to engineering other than a hunch; no numeric weighting given." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If the model can actually show me \"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\" that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-dcb22f82-5927-447e-a35a-4ff18d16ce26", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The model showing \\\"here's where Line 1 loses its time\\\" — something to take to engineering other than a hunch; no numeric weighting given.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Qualitative: showing where Line 1 loses its time, in a form usable with engineering.\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If the model can actually show me \\\\\\\"here's where Line 1 loses its time,\\\\\\\" that's worth more to me long-term than just the one disruption answer, because I could take that to engineering with something other than a hunch.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Whites versus tints (family decides run speed by line and washdown direction; for a white the tint stage is a pass-through); and customer identity — distributor, small account, or an awkward account that gets prickly." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the bumped order's identity matters, not just \"an order got delayed.\"", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0e8d50b2-4222-4129-a619-09c5612c05c5", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Whites versus tints (family decides run speed by line and washdown direction; for a white the tint stage is a pass-through); and customer identity — distributor, small account, or an awkward account that gets prickly.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the bumped order's identity matters, not just \\\\\\\"an order got delayed.\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Quantity, due date, SKU; family (white/tint); customer; remaining quantity and how far through the run it is." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-117f9832-aaba-473a-9411-6fd4022388f2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU; family (white/tint); customer; remaining quantity and how far through the run it is.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The expert described orders arriving as line items in the demand book but gave no counts or arrival volumes.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user", + "pointer": "demand book / ERP" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-e10d4081-78ed-42da-bb26-857f1118224c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\",\"pointer\":\"demand book / ERP\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The expert described orders arriving as line items in the demand book but gave no counts or arrival volumes.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "Line 1 and Line 2", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Two lines: Line 2 is the faster machine on whites (roughly twice as fast, \"really a whites number\"); Line 1 is the slower machine, add fifty to sixty percent on a white. On tints the two run at nearly the same speed." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "That's the \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-875ed21b-d257-48fe-867b-6785abf6abb7", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Two lines: Line 2 is the faster machine on whites (roughly twice as fast, \\\"really a whites number\\\"); Line 1 is the slower machine, add fifty to sixty percent on a white. On tints the two run at nearly the same speed.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"Line 1 and Line 2\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That's the \\\\\\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\\\\\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "Line 1 and Line 2", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "What order is on it, how far through that order is, and what family (tint or white) it is currently running — the last decides washdown cost and direction." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-06d48b41-86fb-48c0-b3e0-59012ba81960", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"What order is on it, how far through that order is, and what family (tint or white) it is currently running — the last decides washdown cost and direction.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"Line 1 and Line 2\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "Line 1 and Line 2", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "number", + "rationale": "The expert speaks only of Line 1 and Line 2 throughout.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Two lines — Line 1 and Line 2." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-428e3931-676d-4af5-a30c-d7a31ea0d8ad", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Two lines — Line 1 and Line 2.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"Line 1 and Line 2\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"The expert speaks only of Line 1 and Line 2 throughout.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 was mid-run on a tint.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On the sheet, \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" is one row\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "mix, mill, tint, fill kit and holding tanks", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Mix, mill, tint and fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together, with small holding tanks between them." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ecd3c093-8f6b-4a48-a1fc-d2775d4dbc1f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Mix, mill, tint and fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together, with small holding tanks between them.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"mix, mill, tint, fill kit and holding tanks\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"But physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "mix, mill, tint, fill kit and holding tanks", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Qualitative \"small\" only; sizes deferred to engineering drawings.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "engineering drawings" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c6339dee-036e-47cb-9dcf-42fc22d38aae", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"engineering drawings\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"mix, mill, tint, fill kit and holding tanks\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Qualitative \\\"small\\\" only; sizes deferred to engineering drawings.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I just know the tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "holding tank capacity between stages", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Blocking consequence stated; frequency and size not tracked.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A stage can only get a head start if there's room in the holding tank ahead of it; when a tank's full, mixing has to wait. How often that blocking happens is not tracked by the expert." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-2bc071c4-2919-4ff3-910a-92d872eeaef2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A stage can only get a head start if there's room in the holding tank ahead of it; when a tank's full, mixing has to wait. How often that blocking happens is not tracked by the expert.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"holding tank capacity between stages\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Blocking consequence stated; frequency and size not tracked.\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "order lifecycle: allocate, run, QA hold, release and ship", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6ec49aac-c165-4e2b-a937-bed3c8c51c2c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"order lifecycle: allocate, run, QA hold, release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "order lifecycle: allocate, run, QA hold, release and ship", + "slot": "how a branch or merge is decided", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The line choice is made by the scheduler at allocation and can be revisited on disruption.", + "assertion": { + "value": "The scheduler slots the order onto a line on the sheet at allocation; on a disruption the choice is re-decided — shift it to the other line or wait out the repair." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c3f03d77-6760-4b3b-99e5-b78d119a352f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The scheduler slots the order onto a line on the sheet at allocation; on a disruption the choice is re-decided — shift it to the other line or wait out the repair.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"order lifecycle: allocate, run, QA hold, release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The line choice is made by the scheduler at allocation and can be revisited on disruption.\",\"slot\":\"how a branch or merge is decided\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I had to decide right then whether to shift it to Line 1 or just wait out the repair\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "stage overlap on a line", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "prescribed", + "assertion": { + "value": "On the sheet the line is one row: the order occupies the line for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it's done." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \"Line 2\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4cdad6ac-6cd9-46d4-b3ea-62401019ae14", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"On the sheet the line is one row: the order occupies the line for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it's done.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"stage overlap on a line\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"sourceRegime\":\"prescribed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On the sheet, \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "stage overlap on a line", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "The mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill; the crew get a head start on mixing when the tank ahead has space." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it. That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-83e1381a-f2df-4713-a2f6-f11d034c2fd4", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill; the crew get a head start on mixing when the tank ahead has space.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"stage overlap on a line\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it. That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order allocated onto a line and a slot in the week (\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation\")." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-95cbfe20-605f-4218-9076-0f4816ebadfa", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order allocated onto a line and a slot in the week (\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation\\\").\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Filled and packed product coming off the fill line, which then goes into QA hold." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1a5a8343-7367-416e-b760-c7e8f587fe25", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Filled and packed product coming off the fill line, which then goes into QA hold.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "The line (Line 1 or Line 2) — its mix, mill, tint and fill kit — worked by the crew." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-bf2e57a3-bda7-4090-92ca-af63e0c7a248", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The line (Line 1 or Line 2) — its mix, mill, tint and fill kit — worked by the crew.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "rationale": "First account of a white run on Line 2, mix-to-last-pack, including breakdowns folded in loosely.", + "assertion": { + "value": "White, Line 2, normal order size, mix-to-last-pack: typical eight to nine hours; one in ten worse twelve to thirteen hours; one in ten better about six hours. (Expert later said the twelve-thirteen folds in breakdowns.)" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Bad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-aec8ff27-3e3f-45d2-9142-b6dc2b5d88a3", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"White, Line 2, normal order size, mix-to-last-pack: typical eight to nine hours; one in ten worse twelve to thirteen hours; one in ten better about six hours. (Expert later said the twelve-thirteen folds in breakdowns.)\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"rationale\":\"First account of a white run on Line 2, mix-to-last-pack, including breakdowns folded in loosely.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Bad day, one run in ten worse — you're looking at something like twelve, thirteen hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "rationale": "Supersedes the earlier figure by stripping breakdowns out of the run duration; jams are modelled separately.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Clean run (nothing breaks), white on Line 2: typical eight or nine hours; bad-but-clean one in ten nine to ten hours; one in ten better about six hours. The twelve-thirteen hour bad day is a breakdown showing up inside the run, not the run itself being slow." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup, nothing — a clean run doesn't really vary that much from typical. Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9d59a385-a8ae-410a-a13d-a4bca3dde9a3", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Clean run (nothing breaks), white on Line 2: typical eight or nine hours; bad-but-clean one in ten nine to ten hours; one in ten better about six hours. The twelve-thirteen hour bad day is a breakdown showing up inside the run, not the run itself being slow.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"rationale\":\"Supersedes the earlier figure by stripping breakdowns out of the run duration; jams are modelled separately.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If nothing breaks — no jam, no QA holdup, nothing — a clean run doesn't really vary that much from typical. Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing. Not the twelve-thirteen number.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "rationale": "Same white order on Line 1.", + "assertion": { + "value": "White on Line 1: typical thirteen to fourteen hours; worse days pushing eighteen-plus; best day maybe ten — roughly fifty to sixty percent more than Line 2." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4b22a066-a97c-4329-8513-cbd85edd8d65", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"White on Line 1: typical thirteen to fourteen hours; worse days pushing eighteen-plus; best day maybe ten — roughly fifty to sixty percent more than Line 2.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"rationale\":\"Same white order on Line 1.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "rationale": "Only a typical range was given for tints; no one-in-ten figures.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Tint run on either line: eight to ten hours typical; no big gap between the lines. One-in-ten worse/better not given." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-63fabb67-24c4-4bee-926f-17917300c8f4", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Tint run on either line: eight to ten hours typical; no big gap between the lines. One-in-ten worse/better not given.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Only a typical range was given for tints; no one-in-ten figures.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes — run time varies by family and by line: whites are about twice as fast on Line 2 as Line 1, tints run at nearly the same speed on both; and different SKUs are slow at different stages." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "That's the \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b1e5ded4-79d6-4ff4-bd0d-6386509efba9", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes — run time varies by family and by line: whites are about twice as fast on Line 2 as Line 1, tints run at nearly the same speed on both; and different SKUs are slow at different stages.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"the run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That's the \\\\\\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\\\\\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "It stops the run on the line — \"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\" — forcing the wait-or-shift decision." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-147c2765-6bfb-4da0-9df9-b74a1c1049de", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"It stops the run on the line — \\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\\\" — forcing the wait-or-shift decision.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step", + "precision": "range", + "rationale": "Line 2 filler, jams bad enough to stop the run.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Every week or two; low end once every three weeks, high end twice a week when temperamental. Not seasonal, but runs streaks of bad weeks." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "It's a \"every week or two\" thing — low end maybe once every three weeks if we're lucky, high end twice a week if it's being temperamental. It's not seasonal or anything I can point to, it just runs a streak of bad weeks sometimes.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ec5740e7-5068-4222-ad24-8396f5975657", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Every week or two; low end once every three weeks, high end twice a week when temperamental. Not seasonal, but runs streaks of bad weeks.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"Line 2 filler, jams bad enough to stop the run.\",\"slot\":\"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"It's a \\\\\\\"every week or two\\\\\\\" thing — low end maybe once every three weeks if we're lucky, high end twice a week if it's being temperamental. It's not seasonal or anything I can point to, it just runs a streak of bad weeks sometimes.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "assertion": { + "value": "Typical repair thirty to forty-five minutes; one-in-ten quick ten to fifteen minutes (a false alarm); one-in-ten bad four to five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift, when something's actually broken in the filler head." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "typical repair is call it thirty to forty-five minutes — tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Quick one-in-ten is more like ten, fifteen minutes, basically a false alarm.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "that's when it's not just a jam but something's actually broken in the filler head, and that can run four, five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-2884cc84-c616-4227-860a-d6b55a06c13d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Typical repair thirty to forty-five minutes; one-in-ten quick ten to fifteen minutes (a false alarm); one-in-ten bad four to five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift, when something's actually broken in the filler head.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Quick one-in-ten is more like ten, fifteen minutes, basically a false alarm.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that's when it's not just a jam but something's actually broken in the filler head, and that can run four, five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"typical repair is call it thirty to forty-five minutes — tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Repair is done by a tech.", + "assertion": { + "value": "A tech — comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-0548a680-8da8-47e9-ad72-fb1e264fac80", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A tech — comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Repair is done by a tech.\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "At the time of the decision the repair length is unobservable to the scheduler.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Repair duration is not known at the time of the decision — \"which I never know at the time\"; only \"could be quick, could be long\"." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "how long is this repair *actually* going to take, which I never know at the time", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-8c6a716b-e09a-4977-94d9-f28ab74be7c4", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Repair duration is not known at the time of the decision — \\\"which I never know at the time\\\"; only \\\"could be quick, could be long\\\".\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"At the time of the decision the repair length is unobservable to the scheduler.\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"how long is this repair *actually* going to take, which I never know at the time\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "number", + "rationale": "Single figure given; no spread elicited.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours for a tint-to-white washdown." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a67683fd-0f34-4838-b48e-aa01f657a511", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours for a tint-to-white washdown.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Single figure given; no spread elicited.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "A changeover of family on the line; the direction matters as much as the fact of it — tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1b632a29-f1de-48e5-8f96-a5ef908c4a56", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A changeover of family on the line; the direction matters as much as the fact of it — tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "Hours and crew time are known; ramp scrap is named but unquantified.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user", + "pointer": "ramp scrap after the washdown — \"which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored\"; three hours of line and crew time are known" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9926552e-289f-4b4a-bc99-4cae34f1720a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\",\"pointer\":\"ramp scrap after the washdown — \\\"which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored\\\"; three hours of line and crew time are known\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"Hours and crew time are known; ramp scrap is named but unquantified.\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "The crew, on the line being changed over (Line 1 in the incident described)." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-06aac0a9-b270-4b13-a54f-37440769d685", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The crew, on the line being changed over (Line 1 in the incident described).\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "rationale": "\"a few hours for a white\" — no quantiles given, and the specialty wait is named but unquantified.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Usually a few hours for a white; \"nothing like the specialty wait\" — specialty duration not given." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-94948329-18e7-42fe-9538-a84fd72c225d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Usually a few hours for a white; \\\"nothing like the specialty wait\\\" — specialty duration not given.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"rationale\":\"\\\"a few hours for a white\\\" — no quantiles given, and the specialty wait is named but unquantified.\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "The lab." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-16b9c643-8b17-490e-bfe0-022a06efd914", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The lab.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-5ae45290-5d13-4f2b-b24b-82c66d3d48af", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Judgment on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I use judgment on who can absorb the slip", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-821e00ef-6923-43b0-955b-3ed7d60ce127", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Judgment on who can absorb the slip: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug; a small account sliding a week is fine; an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I use judgment on who can absorb the slip\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The hard on-time line for an order like Meridian overrides the weighing — it is not a trade-off, and is only crossed if there's truly no way through." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6da3fa16-460b-4f07-aefc-f941d7118f76", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The hard on-time line for an order like Meridian overrides the weighing — it is not a trade-off, and is only crossed if there's truly no way through.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "Meridian ships on time", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Meridian ships on time, full stop; days late above zero is bad news the scheduler has to go explain. Only crossed \"unless there's truly no way through\"." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-731a5768-edc7-4858-ad42-50d2faf4b181", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Meridian ships on time, full stop; days late above zero is bad news the scheduler has to go explain. Only crossed \\\"unless there's truly no way through\\\".\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"Meridian ships on time\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "boundary-condition", + "node": "demand book from ERP", + "slot": "the starting state", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Orders start life as line items in the demand book once ERP spits it out, carrying quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1bebb3ea-7788-477a-8127-593fe3fe6026", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Orders start life as line items in the demand book once ERP spits it out, carrying quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"boundary-condition\",\"node\":\"demand book from ERP\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the starting state\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "boundary-condition", + "node": "demand book from ERP", + "slot": "the arrival or availability pattern", + "precision": "named", + "rationale": "The expert named the demand book as the source but the arrival pattern was flagged as still open when the session ended.", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "how orders arrive into the demand book — named as still open at the close of the session" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-07cb7ca9-27c5-4395-bc9e-aaebc5811382", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"how orders arrive into the demand book — named as still open at the close of the session\"},\"kind\":\"boundary-condition\",\"node\":\"demand book from ERP\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"rationale\":\"The expert named the demand book as the source but the arrival pattern was flagged as still open when the session ended.\",\"slot\":\"the arrival or availability pattern\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "stage-level times in the historian", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — feed: the historian; never pulled apart by the expert." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "nobody's ever broken that down by \"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-882fa9a2-3a16-46df-90b7-d5ab8ee1dce2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Stage-by-stage durations (how long mixing takes, how long milling takes) — feed: the historian; never pulled apart by the expert.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"stage-level times in the historian\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"nobody's ever broken that down by \\\\\\\"how long does mixing take, how long does milling take\\\\\\\" — that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "tank sizes from engineering drawings", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "Holding tank sizes, especially mill-to-fill on Line 1 — feed: engineering drawings." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b6c2c920-801d-4858-b2c7-64c13ebfc5b1", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Holding tank sizes, especially mill-to-fill on Line 1 — feed: engineering drawings.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"tank sizes from engineering drawings\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "filler repair work-order times in the CMMS", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "Actual filler repair durations — feed: maintenance work-order times in the CMMS; never pulled by the expert." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "maintenance would have the actual work-order times in the CMMS but I've never pulled them", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-a0429a34-1145-458d-bada-32d827d68959", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Actual filler repair durations — feed: maintenance work-order times in the CMMS; never pulled by the expert.\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"filler repair work-order times in the CMMS\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"maintenance would have the actual work-order times in the CMMS but I've never pulled them\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "wait or shift when Line 2 goes down", + "slot": "the question, in the expert's words", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "The expert wrote the question as he would type it into the tool.", + "assertion": { + "value": "\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\"", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-48033ee8-f7eb-4615-b21f-018837fc9c5e", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"\\\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\\\"\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"wait or shift when Line 2 goes down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"The expert wrote the question as he would type it into the tool.\",\"slot\":\"the question, in the expert's words\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"\\\\\\\"If Line 2 goes down mid-run, is it cheaper to wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1, given what that costs the order already running there?\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "wait or shift when Line 2 goes down", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "entity-type:order (demand book line item) — its due date and remaining quantity; entity-type:line (Line 1 / Line 2) — what is on Line 1 and how far through; entity-type:product family (white vs tint); activity:production run (mix, mill, tint, fill); activity:filler jam on Line 2 — repair length unknown at the time; activity:tint-to-white washdown — including its direction and ramp scrap; policy:who can absorb the slip — whose tint got bumped" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "What it hangs on: the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way). It hangs on the jam itself — how long is this repair *actually* going to take", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it, and the bumped order's identity matters, not just \"an order got delayed.\"", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-88da9925-d922-48c3-8ea0-2c631df3ae3d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"entity-type:order (demand book line item) — its due date and remaining quantity; entity-type:line (Line 1 / Line 2) — what is on Line 1 and how far through; entity-type:product family (white vs tint); activity:production run (mix, mill, tint, fill); activity:filler jam on Line 2 — repair length unknown at the time; activity:tint-to-white washdown — including its direction and ramp scrap; policy:who can absorb the slip — whose tint got bumped\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"wait or shift when Line 2 goes down\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"What it hangs on: the run I'm trying to protect (Meridian, its due date, its remaining quantity), the state of Line 1 right then — what's on it, how far through, what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way). It hangs on the jam itself — how long is this repair *actually* going to take\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the direction of the changeover matters as much as the fact of it, and the bumped order's identity matters, not just \\\\\\\"an order got delayed.\\\\\\\"\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "wait or shift when Line 2 goes down", + "slot": "what \"better\" means, and trade-off weights", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Lexicographic: days late on Meridian first, anything above zero is bad; below that, weigh washdown hours against whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and who the customer is. No formula — judgment on who can absorb the slip." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \"cross the line\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \"how bad is bad\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-f53d8f62-375e-4af6-9aaa-fb903839993c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Lexicographic: days late on Meridian first, anything above zero is bad; below that, weigh washdown hours against whether the bumped order goes late and by how much and who the customer is. No formula — judgment on who can absorb the slip.\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"wait or shift when Line 2 goes down\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what \\\"better\\\" means, and trade-off weights\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: Meridian on time is non-negotiable, and everything else — washdown hours, whether the bumped order goes late and by how much — is what I'm weighing when I'm not in a \\\\\\\"cross the line\\\\\\\" situation. I don't have a formula for it. It's more \\\\\\\"how bad is bad\\\\\\\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"the first number is just yes/no, or if you want it as a number, days late on Meridian, and anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "objective", + "node": "is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down", + "slot": "the nodes it depends on", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "activity:production run (mix, mill, tint, fill) — stage-level mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1; constraint:small holding tanks between stages — the mill-to-fill tank size on Line 1; entity-type:product family (white vs tint) — different SKUs are slow at different stages" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have. It also probably depends on the product, since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ac435640-eea2-4ad6-9695-8e5408b4d852", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"activity:production run (mix, mill, tint, fill) — stage-level mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1; constraint:small holding tanks between stages — the mill-to-fill tank size on Line 1; entity-type:product family (white vs tint) — different SKUs are slow at different stages\"},\"kind\":\"objective\",\"node\":\"is the mill-to-fill tank on Line 1 slowing the line down\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the nodes it depends on\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That one hangs on the stage-level rates — mill speed versus fill speed on Line 1 specifically — and the tank size between them, neither of which I have. It also probably depends on the product, since I now realize different SKUs are slow at different stages\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "stage-level times from the historian and tank sizes from engineering drawings", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "the historian (stage-by-stage times) and engineering drawings (tank sizes)" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I don't have clean numbers for tank sizes or stage-by-stage rates.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that. Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 15, + "entryEnd": 15 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-f5a658db-c8ec-4ca0-8a87-3ad252dee56d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"the historian (stage-by-stage times) and engineering drawings (tank sizes)\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"stage-level times from the historian and tank sizes from engineering drawings\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I don't have clean numbers for tank sizes or stage-by-stage rates.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"that lives in the historian somewhere, and I've never pulled it apart like that. Tank sizes I could probably get from engineering drawings, but I don't carry them in my head.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":15,\\\"entryStart\\\":15,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "data-binding", + "node": "filler repair times from the CMMS", + "slot": "the variable and its feed", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "absence": "deferred", + "pointer": "maintenance work-order times in the CMMS" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "maintenance would have the actual work-order times in the CMMS but I've never pulled them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I'll ask maintenance for the CMMS numbers on the filler too while I'm at it.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 30, + "entryEnd": 30 + }, + "source": "user" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-618842bb-d23d-4371-ae57-73e5257ba215", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"deferred\",\"pointer\":\"maintenance work-order times in the CMMS\"},\"kind\":\"data-binding\",\"node\":\"filler repair times from the CMMS\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"the variable and its feed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I'll ask maintenance for the CMMS numbers on the filler too while I'm at it.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":30,\\\"entryStart\\\":30,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"maintenance would have the actual work-order times in the CMMS but I've never pulled them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "boundary-condition", + "node": "demand book line items out of ERP", + "slot": "the starting state", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "An order starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out, carrying quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-538fb022-2495-46bb-8661-8e1f38c802bf", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"An order starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out, carrying quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"boundary-condition\",\"node\":\"demand book line items out of ERP\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the starting state\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order (demand book line item)", + "slot": "state that rides along with each instance", + "precision": "spelled out", + "rationale": "Quantity, due date and SKU are explicit; remaining quantity and customer identity are named later as things the answer hangs on.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Quantity, due date, SKU; plus remaining quantity and the customer's identity, which the expert weighs when an order slips." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-ec8c16b7-d4c0-46fa-a64d-63a23fa37b98", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Quantity, due date, SKU; plus remaining quantity and the customer's identity, which the expert weighs when an order slips.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order (demand book line item)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"rationale\":\"Quantity, due date and SKU are explicit; remaining quantity and customer identity are named later as things the answer hangs on.\",\"slot\":\"state that rides along with each instance\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "order (demand book line item)", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Orders are treated apart by whose order it is: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-5d5f862f-c18c-4501-b544-76735d28e004", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Orders are treated apart by whose order it is: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"order (demand book line item)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "product family (white vs tint)", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Whites versus tints: for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step; tints run at nearly the same speed on both lines while whites do not; and the tint-to-white changeover direction is the expensive one." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7f6b8be1-6336-465f-8e11-36a5277d51bd", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Whites versus tints: for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step; tints run at nearly the same speed on both lines while whites do not; and the tint-to-white changeover direction is the expensive one.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"product family (white vs tint)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through, though for a white the tint stage is barely there, more of a pass-through than a real letdown step.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line (Line 1 / Line 2)", + "slot": "the distinctions the process treats apart", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Line 1 is the slower machine on whites (add maybe fifty, sixty percent to Line 2's times); on tints Line 1 and Line 2 run at nearly the same speed." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-1a83c9c6-a8f8-4ece-a5d4-53b81bf8cc9b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Line 1 is the slower machine on whites (add maybe fifty, sixty percent to Line 2's times); on tints Line 1 and Line 2 run at nearly the same speed.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line (Line 1 / Line 2)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the distinctions the process treats apart\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "entity-type", + "node": "line (Line 1 / Line 2)", + "slot": "how many there are, or the population's shape", + "precision": "number", + "rationale": "Only Line 1 and Line 2 are ever named; the count itself was never stated as a figure.", + "assertion": { + "value": "Two lines (Line 1 and Line 2), each comprising separate mix, mill, tint and fill kit with small holding tanks between." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "inferred", + "id": "capture-e6ae51ed-e1f6-45f3-aab1-c4bca2a979e8", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Two lines (Line 1 and Line 2), each comprising separate mix, mill, tint and fill kit with small holding tanks between.\"},\"kind\":\"entity-type\",\"node\":\"line (Line 1 / Line 2)\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"rationale\":\"Only Line 1 and Line 2 are ever named; the count itself was never stated as a figure.\",\"slot\":\"how many there are, or the population's shape\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"physically, no — mix, mill, tint, fill are separate tanks and separate kit strung together with small holding tanks in between.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "order flow from demand book to ship", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c2d2a972-d139-43a7-80c2-50108d92f7a7", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"order flow from demand book to ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So really: allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week → run it through mix/mill/tint/fill → QA hold → release and ship. Four steps if you count QA and shipping as one, five if you split them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "line occupancy across the four stages", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "prescribed", + "assertion": { + "value": "On the sheet, Line 2 is one row: the order occupies Line 2 for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it is done." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On the sheet, \"Line 2\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \"Line 2\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-6c277c9b-2362-4158-8a3b-e069ff0c9a01", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"On the sheet, Line 2 is one row: the order occupies Line 2 for its whole run, mix through fill, and nothing else is scheduled on it until it is done.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"line occupancy across the four stages\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"sourceRegime\":\"prescribed\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On the sheet, \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" is one row — I treat it as one thing, the order occupies \\\\\\\"Line 2\\\\\\\" for its whole run, mix through fill, nothing else scheduled on it till it's done.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "ordering/flow", + "node": "line occupancy across the four stages", + "slot": "the order things happen in", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Physically the stages overlap: the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there is room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill; the crew will get a head start on mixing if the tank ahead has space." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it. That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7f9ac97e-375b-4de3-bbcd-b65e5c7427a6", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Physically the stages overlap: the mixer can start the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there is room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill; the crew will get a head start on mixing if the tank ahead has space.\"},\"kind\":\"ordering/flow\",\"node\":\"line occupancy across the four stages\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the order things happen in\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So in principle the mixer could be starting the next order's batch while the fill head is still finishing the last one, if there's room in the holding tank between mix and mill, or mill and fill, to buffer it. That does happen sometimes — the crew will get a head start on mixing the next batch if the tank ahead of it has space.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "small holding tanks between stages", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and when a tank is full, mixing has to wait; how much overlap happens or how often it is blocked is not tracked." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 12, + "entryEnd": 12 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-66fbb371-91b7-41db-b437-5bd207d08aed", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The tanks are small — especially the one between mill and fill on Line 1 — and when a tank is full, mixing has to wait; how much overlap happens or how often it is blocked is not tracked.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"small holding tanks between stages\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"What I don't really track is *how much* overlap happens or how often it's blocked because a tank's full and mixing has to wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":12,\\\"entryStart\\\":12,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation onto a line and a slot in the week", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "The master scheduler, on the sheet." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-8da19d62-c082-41f6-ac55-f28afe266a8c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The master scheduler, on the sheet.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation onto a line and a slot in the week\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation onto a line and a slot in the week", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "A line item in the demand book out of ERP, with quantity, due date and SKU." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU. I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-995374a1-2d25-4690-8397-b342f46ebf02", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A line item in the demand book out of ERP, with quantity, due date and SKU.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation onto a line and a slot in the week\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"So it starts life as a line item in the demand book once ERP spits that out — quantity, due date, SKU. I slot it onto Line 2 on the sheet, that's step one, allocation.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "allocation onto a line and a slot in the week", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is placed onto a named line and a slot in the week." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-3cc84392-4ed4-4804-8a7c-db07d384a8b2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is placed onto a named line and a slot in the week.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"allocation onto a line and a slot in the week\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"allocate it onto a line and a slot in the week\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "what it needs before it can start", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order allocated to a line and a slot in the week; then it runs the same four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Then it actually has to get produced — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-289ac648-e939-4e62-ad46-a17b112402d4", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order allocated to a line and a slot in the week; then it runs the same four stages every product goes through — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it needs before it can start\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it actually has to get produced — mix, mill, tint, fill and pack, same four stages every product goes through\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "Packed product coming off the fill line, which then goes into QA hold." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-5376c084-3889-476f-adab-b09a038ded28", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Packed product coming off the fill line, which then goes into QA hold.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "White, Meridian-sized, on Line 2, clean of breakdowns: typical eight to nine hours mix-to-last-pack; one in ten worse nine to ten hours; one in ten better maybe six hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b9dfddf9-52d8-433e-81b8-5611e7356c34", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"White, Meridian-sized, on Line 2, clean of breakdowns: typical eight to nine hours mix-to-last-pack; one in ten worse nine to ten hours; one in ten better maybe six hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Good day, one in ten better, maybe six hours if everything's clean and the crew doesn't have to stop for anything.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Maybe nine, ten hours on a bad-but-clean day versus eight or nine typical, just normal slack, someone's a bit slow changing a roll of packaging film, that sort of thing.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a typical Meridian-sized white run on Line 2 — we're usually talking a full shift, maybe a bit more, call it eight, nine hours mix-to-last-pack for a normal order size\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "assertion": { + "value": "Same white order on Line 1: typical thirteen to fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten — add maybe fifty, sixty percent to Line 2. (Stated before the breakdown/clean-run split was drawn, so the worse figure may still fold in jams.)" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-27ae8fdf-c227-4160-a1a5-e85530156938", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Same white order on Line 1: typical thirteen to fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten — add maybe fifty, sixty percent to Line 2. (Stated before the breakdown/clean-run split was drawn, so the worse figure may still fold in jams.)\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"On Line 1, same order — slower machine, so add maybe fifty, sixty percent to all of that. Call it typical thirteen, fourteen hours, worse days pushing eighteen-plus, best day maybe ten.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "range", + "assertion": { + "value": "A tint run on either line: eight to ten hours typical, without the Line 1 / Line 2 gap." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-7bd393bf-3f05-4aa1-b15a-968c293b076f", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A tint run on either line: eight to ten hours typical, without the Line 1 / Line 2 gap.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)", + "slot": "whether its quantities vary by type", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "Yes — run time varies by product family and line: whites are much slower on Line 1, tints are nearly the same speed on either line; the \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" figure is really a whites number. No explanation for the tint case; it is sheet-derived." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap. I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "That's the \"Line 2 is twice as fast\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 18, + "entryEnd": 18 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-ef41e72f-3126-4003-82b2-686b5f8bfdfb", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Yes — run time varies by product family and line: whites are much slower on Line 1, tints are nearly the same speed on either line; the \\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\" figure is really a whites number. No explanation for the tint case; it is sheet-derived.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"production run (mix, mill, tint, fill)\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"whether its quantities vary by type\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"That's the \\\\\\\"Line 2 is twice as fast\\\\\\\" thing people say, though that's really a whites number.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Tints are the funny one — I mentioned this before — Line 1 and Line 2 run tints at nearly the same speed, so a tint run on either line looks more like eight to ten hours typical, without that big gap. I've never had a good reason for why, it's just something the sheet has always shown when I've compared them.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":18,\\\"entryStart\\\":18,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam on Line 2", + "slot": "how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step", + "precision": "range", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Every week or two; low end once every three weeks, high end twice a week. Not seasonal, but runs streaks of bad weeks." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "It's a \"every week or two\" thing — low end maybe once every three weeks if we're lucky, high end twice a week if it's being temperamental. It's not seasonal or anything I can point to, it just runs a streak of bad weeks sometimes.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-4fa34ba3-82e3-4a4a-ad28-362765a40046", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Every week or two; low end once every three weeks, high end twice a week. Not seasonal, but runs streaks of bad weeks.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam on Line 2\",\"precision\":\"range\",\"slot\":\"how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"It's a \\\\\\\"every week or two\\\\\\\" thing — low end maybe once every three weeks if we're lucky, high end twice a week if it's being temperamental. It's not seasonal or anything I can point to, it just runs a streak of bad weeks sometimes.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam on Line 2", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "spread", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Repair: typical thirty to forty-five minutes; quick one-in-ten ten to fifteen minutes (basically a false alarm); bad one-in-ten four to five hours when something is actually broken in the filler head, occasionally eating the rest of the shift." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "typical repair is call it thirty to forty-five minutes — tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again. Quick one-in-ten is more like ten, fifteen minutes, basically a false alarm. The bad one-in-ten is the one that scares me — that's when it's not just a jam but something's actually broken in the filler head, and that can run four, five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-2f670377-be1e-4275-9e46-24dd13316300", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Repair: typical thirty to forty-five minutes; quick one-in-ten ten to fifteen minutes (basically a false alarm); bad one-in-ten four to five hours when something is actually broken in the filler head, occasionally eating the rest of the shift.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam on Line 2\",\"precision\":\"spread\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"typical repair is call it thirty to forty-five minutes — tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again. Quick one-in-ten is more like ten, fifteen minutes, basically a false alarm. The bad one-in-ten is the one that scares me — that's when it's not just a jam but something's actually broken in the filler head, and that can run four, five hours, occasionally eating the rest of the shift.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam on Line 2", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "A tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed and resets." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 27, + "entryEnd": 27 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9dc62989-7db7-4e58-baf1-b9ed0400d9a2", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"A tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed and resets.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam on Line 2\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"tech comes over, clears whatever's jammed, resets, we're going again\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":27,\\\"entryStart\\\":27,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "filler jam on Line 2", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The run stops and time is lost inside the run — the big bad days (twelve to thirteen hours) are the breakdown showing up inside the run rather than the run being slow." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 21, + "entryEnd": 21 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-b92eccd9-e2ad-41a9-abce-bb1cf8b3c328", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The run stops and time is lost inside the run — the big bad days (twelve to thirteen hours) are the breakdown showing up inside the run rather than the run being slow.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"filler jam on Line 2\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Line 2 filler jammed at about nine in the morning, half a shift lost.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"The twelve-thirteen is almost always because something broke or stalled — the filler jam, mostly, sometimes a materials hiccup.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":21,\\\"entryStart\\\":21,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "number", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-55e95600-febe-4c98-8859-a56eb23ab156", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I pull Line 1 off that to cover Meridian, I eat a tint-to-white washdown — three hours — plus the tint order I bumped now might itself be late.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what is lost when it changes the system's mode", + "precision": "number", + "assertion": { + "value": "Three hours of crew time with Line 1 out of anything else for that window; direction matters — tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-29c03a62-4be2-4dc2-852e-bfeab6770f1b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Three hours of crew time with Line 1 out of anything else for that window; direction matters — tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"number\",\"slot\":\"what is lost when it changes the system's mode\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Underneath that it's washdown hours — the three-hour tint-to-white hit is real cost, crew time, and it takes Line 1 out of anything else for that window.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"what family it is, because that decides the washdown cost and direction (tint-to-white is the expensive one, not the other way)\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "tint-to-white washdown", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "absence": "unknown-to-user", + "pointer": "ramp scrap after the washdown — real product lost on top of the hours; no good numbers and no source named" + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 24, + "entryEnd": 24 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-9f708103-e43a-4766-bca4-cb3b7060fdcd", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"absence\":\"unknown-to-user\",\"pointer\":\"ramp scrap after the washdown — real product lost on top of the hours; no good numbers and no source named\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"tint-to-white washdown\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"And it hangs on the ramp scrap after the washdown, which I don't have good numbers for but shouldn't be ignored, because that's real product lost on top of the hours.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":24,\\\"entryStart\\\":24,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "release and ship", + "slot": "what it produces or changes", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-fdecb081-5b4a-4c7b-b11d-e0d780df210c", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The order is released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"release and ship\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what it produces or changes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Then it's released, goes to the warehouse, and ships against the due date.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "how long it takes", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "Usually a few hours for a white; nothing like the specialty wait (the specialty wait itself was never quantified)." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-c9379f74-4d1e-41c6-b1bf-a53c9d8fb64d", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Usually a few hours for a white; nothing like the specialty wait (the specialty wait itself was never quantified).\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"how long it takes\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked, that's usually a few hours for a white, nothing like the specialty wait.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "activity", + "node": "QA hold", + "slot": "who or what performs it", + "precision": "named", + "assertion": { + "value": "The lab — it sits in the lab's queue and gets checked." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 9, + "entryEnd": 9 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-12e575e7-b7a9-472d-b165-308334ae7513", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The lab — it sits in the lab's queue and gets checked.\"},\"kind\":\"activity\",\"node\":\"QA hold\",\"precision\":\"named\",\"slot\":\"who or what performs it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"Once it comes off the fill line it goes into QA hold — sits in the lab's queue, gets checked\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":9,\\\"entryStart\\\":9,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Gut math at the huddle: weigh the gamble that the repair is the \"half hour\" kind against the tint-to-white washdown plus the bumped tint order going late. In the Meridian case he went with waiting; it came back in about two hours and just scraped the Thursday due date." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date. But I was sweating it, and honestly I couldn't tell you if that was the right call or I just got lucky.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \"half hour\" kind and not the \"half a shift\" kind.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 3, + "entryEnd": 3 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-bc9d210e-beb9-4f7a-aa5d-243950605a2a", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Gut math at the huddle: weigh the gamble that the repair is the \\\"half hour\\\" kind against the tint-to-white washdown plus the bumped tint order going late. In the Meridian case he went with waiting; it came back in about two hours and just scraped the Thursday due date.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I went with waiting, it came back in about two hours, we just scraped the Thursday due date. But I was sweating it, and honestly I couldn't tell you if that was the right call or I just got lucky.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"If I wait on Line 2, I'm gambling the repair is the \\\\\\\"half hour\\\\\\\" kind and not the \\\\\\\"half a shift\\\\\\\" kind.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":3,\\\"entryStart\\\":3,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1", + "slot": "what overrides it", + "precision": "spelled out", + "assertion": { + "value": "The Meridian-style on-time due date overrides the weighing — a line he won't cross unless there's truly no way through." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-90a38599-7f1b-46ed-9352-d3dd3566b338", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The Meridian-style on-time due date overrides the weighing — a line he won't cross unless there's truly no way through.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"wait for the repair or shift the order to Line 1\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"what overrides it\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "hedged", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "policy", + "node": "who can absorb the slip", + "slot": "the rule as actually practiced", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "Judgment, not a formula: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "I don't have a formula for it. It's more \"how bad is bad\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-d889a88e-b7be-4055-9da1-e64f9fc858b0", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"Judgment, not a formula: a distributor sliding two days is a shrug, a small account sliding a week is fine, an awkward account that gets prickly is a second problem created to solve the first.\"},\"kind\":\"policy\",\"node\":\"who can absorb the slip\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the rule as actually practiced\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"I don't have a formula for it. It's more \\\\\\\"how bad is bad\\\\\\\" for the second-order stuff, and I use judgment on who can absorb the slip.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"a distributor sliding two days is a shrug and a small account sliding a week is fine, but if it's another awkward account that gets prickly, that's a second problem I've created to solve the first one.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + }, + { + "confidence": "firm", + "content": { + "value": { + "type": "slot-asserted", + "kind": "constraint", + "node": "Meridian-style due date is a line I won't cross", + "slot": "the limit and what happens when it is hit", + "precision": "spelled out", + "sourceRegime": "practiced", + "assertion": { + "value": "The protected order must ship on time; days late above zero is bad news the scheduler has to go explain. The line is crossed only if there's truly no way through." + } + } + }, + "evidence": [ + { + "excerpt": "did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through.", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + }, + { + "excerpt": "anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain", + "pointer": { + "sessionId": "baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z", + "entryStart": 6, + "entryEnd": 6 + }, + "source": "user-affordance-payload" + } + ], + "epistemicStatus": "explicit", + "id": "capture-173c6d39-090f-49a7-9e38-c8998003718b", + "dedupKey": "{\"content\":{\"value\":{\"assertion\":{\"value\":\"The protected order must ship on time; days late above zero is bad news the scheduler has to go explain. The line is crossed only if there's truly no way through.\"},\"kind\":\"constraint\",\"node\":\"Meridian-style due date is a line I won't cross\",\"precision\":\"spelled out\",\"slot\":\"the limit and what happens when it is hit\",\"sourceRegime\":\"practiced\",\"type\":\"slot-asserted\"}},\"evidence\":[\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"anything above zero is bad news I have to go explain\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\",\"{\\\"excerpt\\\":\\\"did Meridian ship on time or not, full stop — that one's not really a trade-off, that's a line I won't cross unless there's truly no way through.\\\",\\\"pointer\\\":{\\\"entryEnd\\\":6,\\\"entryStart\\\":6,\\\"sessionId\\\":\\\"baseline-condition-5-2026-08-25T19-21-21-703Z\\\"},\\\"source\\\":\\\"user-affordance-payload\\\"}\"]}" + } + ], + "issues": [], + "events": [] + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/proofs/design/cps-interview-guidance-desk-replay.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/proofs/design/cps-interview-guidance-desk-replay.md index 0089ce0b3ef..effc9a62ffa 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/proofs/design/cps-interview-guidance-desk-replay.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/proofs/design/cps-interview-guidance-desk-replay.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ utterance available before condition 2's eleventh interviewer response. ## Fixed inputs and method -- guidance under test: [`cps-interview-guidance.md`](../../../archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md) (archived 2026-08-25; its cards are now patterns in [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md`](../../../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md)) +- guidance under test: [`cps-interview-guidance.md`](../../../archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md) (archived 2026-08-25; its cards are now patterns in [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml)) - completion oracle: `cps-baseline-replay/2026-08-24.3` from the FE-1402 rehearsal - failure signatures: the reviewed FE-1407 catalogue - transcripts: FE-1361 condition 1 and condition 2, one run each diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/proofs/design/cps-interview-guidance-plain.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/proofs/design/cps-interview-guidance-plain.md index 8bc9d43b198..d8c27b1c94b 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/proofs/design/cps-interview-guidance-plain.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/proofs/design/cps-interview-guidance-plain.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # CPS interview guidance in plain language This is the second-register rendering of the provisional -[CPS interview-guidance contract](../../../archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md) (archived 2026-08-25 under ADR-0006; its cards are now patterns in [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md`](../../../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md)). A separate renderer +[CPS interview-guidance contract](../../../archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md) (archived 2026-08-25 under ADR-0006; its cards are now patterns in [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml)). A separate renderer received the spec and desk replay without the producing trajectory. The rendering is reviewer-facing; the specification remains the required-behavior authority. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/proofs/design/plugin-keys-pressure-review-cycle-1.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/proofs/design/plugin-keys-pressure-review-cycle-1.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..afbe5a7f6d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/proofs/design/plugin-keys-pressure-review-cycle-1.md @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ +# Pressure review — ADR-0007 key catalogue, cycle 1 + +> **Provenance.** Agent-authored, read-only desk review, 2026-08-25, commissioned as the +> "validate" step of the first co-authoring cycle (ADR-0007 decision 9, STRATEGY-LOG S-009). +> Inputs: `packages/core/src/{keys,plugin-definition,instructions,cue}.ts`, +> `packages/repertoire/repertoire.yaml`, `packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`, +> `packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml`, the archived CPS interview guidance and its desk +> replay, the elicitation-strategy literature review, the baseline condition-2 transcript and +> read-out, and the SDCPN and Gherkin formalism notes. Status: **evidence, not authority** — its +> proposals are the input to cycle two, recorded in `packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md`; nothing +> here changes a key by itself. Line numbers refer to the files as they stood at commit +> `7d96b695e9`. The `on: []` matching defect it reports (§1.2) was fixed in +> `packages/core/src/cue.ts` in the same change that placed this document. + +Reviewed read-only on 2026-08-25 against `packages/core/src/keys.ts`, `packages/core/src/plugin-definition.ts`, `packages/core/src/instructions.ts`, `packages/core/src/cue.ts`, `packages/repertoire/repertoire.yaml`, `packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`, `packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml`, and the pressure material named in the brief. Paths below are relative to the Brunch context root; line numbers are from the files as read. + +## 1. Summary + +1. **Generality — holds, with one caveat.** All 100 situations in the appendix land on an existing key or contract row; none needs a key the catalogue lacks (zero (d) verdicts; 33 carried by the default, 29 by sdcpn content, 38 expressible but unwritten). A discrete-event/queueing plugin sketches onto the same keys with the same anchor shape (`objective` → dependency slice) and simply reverses one `not_kinds` entry (a queue *is* a node there). The caveat is that the repertoire is a process-model repertoire with the nouns filed off: `movements.sweep` says "every step has a duration, every resource has a count" (repertoire.yaml:73), and four of nine `techniques` defaults are quantity-elicitation methods. The no-formalism test (repertoire.test.ts:15) bans `petri|transition|place|token|…` and does not catch this. +2. **Specificity — the weak axis.** Three places force a cell to be vaguer than the author's knowledge: (i) `patterns` are matched by kind only (cue.ts:40) — P01 and P02 both fire on every failing `activity`, and P08 with `on: []` never fires at all because `[].includes(kind)` is false, contradicting the comment at plugin-definition.ts:82; (ii) `motifs` in the sdcpn cell are name-only one-liners that restate the patterns 1:1 and carry none of the variant axes the repertoire's own "Name plus variant" default demands (repertoire.yaml:98–100) — the shared-resource motif cannot say "one indivisible 2-person server for washdowns, two servers for rinses" (condition-2.md:269, 580); (iii) `must_know.precision` is a single word, so "arrival or availability pattern: spread" cannot accept a shift calendar (spelled out), and "what 'better' means: range" cannot accept "Meridian is a cliff, everyone else a slope" (condition-2.md:114–116), which is a spelled-out rule. +3. **Flexibility — holds for gherkin's cells, strains in the rendering and in one default.** The two plugin.yaml files read as siblings (same sections, comparable cell lengths, both leave `licenses` blank). What does not read as a sibling is the rendered instruction text: gherkin inherits "Mean or tail", "Quantiles, never three points", "Premortem", the clairvoyant test, and "What 'better' means, numerically where possible" — none of which apply to an example-based specification. One default a second formalism would have to *contradict*, which decision 1 forbids: `lenses` "Policy versus practice" treats normative language as a defect; for gherkin's `status: proposed` and for any formal-verification target the normative statement *is* the deliverable. +4. **The largest unwritten thing is not a key but the posture half of the ADR.** `kickoff` produces a posture (repertoire.yaml:164–166) and nothing consumes it: the `trajectory` default has no posture-varied biases (ADR decision 2's "explore openly when appetite is high, synthesise and invite correction when constrained, propose low-risk structure…" is absent from repertoire.yaml:170–182). This is the selection half the audit found dropped before, dropped again. +5. **The repertoire under-fills three keys relative to ADR decision 2's own rows.** `licenses` lacks "press a busy expert", "decline to sweep", and "propose structure as a suggestion" (only batching, grade-naming, assumption, deferral are written); `rabbit_holes` lacks "asking the expert what you failed to ask", "restating the whole model", and "taking a schedule or a document for the practised rule"; `smells` lacks "schema-shaped questioning" and "correction-as-duplication". +6. **Contradictions the repertoire resolves silently:** the clearinghouse probe is licensed by `movements.sweep` (repertoire.yaml:76) while three other sources — the archived CPS guidance (cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md:22–24), the condition-3 prompt, and the ADR's own `rabbit_holes` row — forbid it; the quantile order picks v0's typical-first while citing the IDEA protocol whose point is interval-first; the "no hypothetical without a real case" default would have ruled out condition 2's most productive move (four constructed scenarios, condition-2.md:404–437). Section 5 lists seven. +7. **Duplication is the dominant content defect, not vagueness.** Quantile elicitation is stated four times in the sdcpn render (repertoire techniques, plugin `attributes.quantity`, plugin `techniques`, plugin `failure_modes`); "every rule has an example" appears four times in gherkin (`movements.sweep`, P01, `failure_modes`, `machinery.checks`). Decision 1 says cells add and never override; nothing says they never repeat, and no gate checks it. +8. **Proposed key changes for cycle two (section 3): three, all shape changes inside existing keys, no add/drop/merge.** Add an optional `slot` predicate to `patterns.items` (kind × unsatisfied slot); allow `must_know.precision` to be a list (any-of); give repertoire entries an optional applicability facet keyed to the precision words a plugin demands, so quantity techniques render only for plugins that ask for `range`/`spread`. Six other changes were considered and left. +9. **Formal-verification sketch fits without a new key.** Anchor `property` (depends on "the state and actions it constrains"); kinds `state-variable`, `action`, `property`, `assumption`, `initial-condition`; `licenses` blank, `motifs` and `rabbit_holes` fillable, `techniques` half-blank (no quantities). The only misfit is the "Policy versus practice" default (point 3). +10. **Verdict on the catalogue:** not frozen. Cycle two should change no *key* but must change two key *shapes* (patterns trigger, precision any-of) and fix the P08 matching bug before the catalogue can be said to have been "written against". + +### 1.1 Generality — evidence + +- Coverage: 100 situations; 33 carried by the repertoire default (a, including a/b), 29 by sdcpn contract data or cells (b, including b/a), 38 expressible in an existing key but unwritten (c), 0 inexpressible (d). Counts per key are in section 2. The (c) share is the finding: more than a third of the pressure is direction the catalogue can hold and nobody has written. +- A second process formalism (discrete-event / queueing): anchor `objective` with the same dependency slot; kinds `customer-class`, `station`, `arrival-process`, `service`, `routing`, `discipline`, `objective`. `must_know` rows fit the ladder (`service.duration: spread`, `station.servers: number`, `discipline.rule: spelled out`). Patterns P05 (contention), P07 (varies by class), P03 (batch service) transfer; P13 (dynamics) is absent. `movements.slice` cell: "one customer from arrival to departure"; `sweep` cell: "strata are stations, then classes". `not_kinds` would *include* "queue" as a kind, reversing sdcpn's entry — plugin content, no key change. The repertoire's quantity defaults fit this plugin perfectly, which is the tell: they are DES defaults. +- What generality does not reach: `movements` is fixed to `{slice, sweep}` (keys.ts:33). Every formalism examined fits the pair; a formalism whose interview is a single walkthrough (a checklist audit) would leave `sweep` empty, which the schema allows for plugins but not for the repertoire. + +### 1.2 Specificity — evidence + +- **Pattern triggers.** `PatternRow.kinds` is the only matched field (cue.ts:39–43); `when` is rendered prose (instructions.ts:91). The sdcpn `when` texts distinguish event-shaped from mode-changing activities (plugin.yaml:260–275) — the harness surfaces both P01 and P02 on any `activity` with any unsatisfied slot. Situation Q17 (a failure rate that depends on a dynamics variable, SDCPN doc §Truck fleet) needs a two-kind trigger and has no expression at all. The archived cards carried slot-state predicates (`slot-unaddressed`, `below-demanded-grade`, …; cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md:44–49); the migration dropped them. +- **P08 never fires.** `on: []` (plugin.yaml:301) is documented as "empty means any node" (plugin-definition.ts:82) but `pattern.kinds.includes(node.kind)` on an empty array is always false (cue.ts:40). Source-regime divergence is therefore never surfaced by the harness; only the prose reaches the interviewer. +- **Motif parameters.** The literature's verdict is explicit: "a small quiver of parameterised schemes with explicit variant selectors" and "each motif ships with its obligatory questions" (elicitation-strategy-literature.md:482–486, 529–530). The sdcpn motifs (plugin.yaml:366–378) are six one-liners each restating a pattern's `ask`. The repertoire default "Name plus variant" (repertoire.yaml:98) is violated by the plugin cell rendered directly beneath it. Situations R2 (server semantics), M7 (batch fires at 4 lots *or* 3 hours), F5 (several wear components, weakest decides) all need an axis the motif does not name. This is expressible in prose today (c); whether it needs to be data depends on whether any machinery will consume it — nothing does yet, so leave the shape and fix the content. +- **Precision words.** `boundary-condition.the arrival or availability pattern: spread` (plugin.yaml:162–166) conflates an arrival process (a spread) with an availability calendar (spelled out — condition-2.md:271 "Line 1 and Line 2 run two shifts… Line 3 is day shift only"). `objective.what "better" means: range` (plugin.yaml:137–141) cannot accept the lexicographic cliff/slope rule. Both are content fixes if precision could be any-of; with a single word they force the author to pick the wrong one or split rows. +- **Attributes are documentation, not data.** `ontology.attributes` renders as prose (instructions.ts:67, 104–106). `source-regime` works because the harness special-cases it (`elicited-model.ts:47,121,144–147`); a plugin-declared attribute such as `role: factor | response` (situation O10, Robinson's factor/response classifier) would be text only. +- **Not-applicable on the never-asked row.** `activity.what is lost when it changes the system's mode` is `not_applicable: true` with `why: "routinely never asked"` (plugin.yaml:193–196). The interviewer can satisfy the row by marking N/A without a question; P02 fires only while the slot is unsatisfied. Condition 2's whole-model omission of ramp scrap (readout.md:132) is reproducible under this schema. + +### 1.3 Flexibility — gherkin read critically + +- **Cells that fit well:** `lenses` ("Rules hide in always/never", "Examples hide in stories"), `movements.slice` (one example is the case), `rabbit_holes`, `smells` ("Steps in gestures"). These are better-written than the sdcpn equivalents and expose an sdcpn gap: sdcpn has no "always/never → constraint" lens (X10). +- **Cells that are padded or duplicated:** `movements.sweep` "Every rule has an example" = P01 = `failure_modes` "Rule without example" = `machinery.checks: rule-has-example`. `techniques` "Contrast" ≈ `motifs` "Happy path and unhappy path". `runbooks.review-and-revise.close: []` — allowed, honest. +- **Where the key definition strains:** `must_know` `step.the known step it binds to: named` needs a team step lexicon the interviewer cannot see; the schema has no place for plugin reference *data* (only `machinery.checks`/`tools` identifiers). Not a guidance-key problem, but a plugin needs an input that is neither cell nor code. +- **Defaults that do not fit an example-based formalism (rendered anyway):** techniques "Mean or tail", "Quantiles, never three points", "The clairvoyant test", "Premortem"; kickoff "What 'better' means, numerically where possible"; sweep "every step has a duration, every resource has a count". Six of the repertoire's 36 guidance entries are noise for gherkin. +- **The default gherkin must contradict:** `lenses` "Policy versus practice" (repertoire.yaml:26–28). With `status: proposed` (plugin.yaml:51–54) the person is stating what *should* be true; the lens tells the interviewer to ask "when did that last actually happen". Decision 1 makes this "a finding about the harness". The finding: the lens is right for process models of practice and wrong for specifications of intent; it belongs behind an applicability facet or its text needs a condition ("when the model is of what happens, not of what should"). +- **Sibling legibility of the two files:** yes, as files. Section order, cell shapes, and blank-cell discipline match. Stylistic asymmetry: sdcpn names runbook cells meta-referentially ("what 'no model exists' means here", plugin.yaml:423) while gherkin names them imperatively ("Narrative first", plugin.yaml:197); sdcpn's `patterns.preamble` explains the mechanism (plugin.yaml:252–256) while gherkin's is two lines. Neither reads as the template the other was forced into; gherkin reads as the thinner sibling by choice. + +### 1.4 Flexibility — formal-verification sketch (TLA+/model-checking properties; not written to a file) + +- **Anchor:** `property`, `depends_on: "the state variables and actions it constrains"` (`at least 1`). +- **Kinds (5):** `state-variable` (name, domain, initial value), `action` (enabling condition, effect on state, who or what takes it), `property` (statement; class: safety or liveness; the violating trace the expert can describe), `assumption` (about the environment or fairness; source), `initial-condition`. Floor: 1 `property`, 1 `state-variable`, 1 `action`. +- **must_know precision words used:** `spelled out`, `named`, `at least N`. `range` and `spread` never demanded. +- **Cells filled:** `lenses` ("'must never' is a safety property; 'eventually' is liveness; 'as long as' is a fairness assumption"), `techniques` ("describe the trace that would violate it", "what would a second reader need to check it"), `movements.slice` (one execution trace end to end), `movements.sweep` (every state variable has a domain and an initial value; every action has an enabling condition; every property names the actions that could violate it), `motifs` (mutual exclusion, leader election, request–response, at-most-once — each with the axis: how many parties, what is the failure model), `smells` ("a property stated as an intention", "an action with no enabling condition"), `rabbit_holes` ("writing TLA+ syntax in conversation", "proving anything here"), `failure_modes` ("vacuous property: no action can violate it", "assumption never made explicit"). +- **Cells blank:** `licenses`; `runbooks.review-and-revise` mostly (re-check the property's actions after an action changed). `kickoff` cell: "the system under specification and its environment boundary". `close`: "the property list with its assumptions ledger — the `dafny audit` table shape" (09-formal-verification-canon-survey.md:64). +- **Defaults that misfit:** the four quantity techniques; "Policy versus practice"; kickoff "numerically where possible"; sweep "every step has a duration". Same set as gherkin — the misfit is a property of the repertoire, not of either plugin. + +## 2. Per-key verdict table + +"Situations" counts the appendix rows whose primary key is this one (a row is counted once). Strain: none / wording / shape / missing. + +| Key | Mechanism | Situations carried (count; ids) | Default alone sufficient? | sdcpn cell needed? | gherkin cell needed? | Strain | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| `lenses` | attention | 10; C3, S3, Q1, P2, P3, T3, X2, X4, X9, X10 | For vague terms, policy/practice, tension, cues, burden — yes. Missing: source-vs-source disagreement (S3), unexplained domain word (X4), document-derived facts (X9). | Yes — resource in passing, "it depends", event-shaped, continuous. Missing: always/never → constraint (X10); a duration that depends on the clock (T3). | Yes — always/never, stories. | **wording**: "Policy versus practice" must be conditioned or faceted; gherkin/FV contradict it. | +| `techniques` | technique | 12; O4, C7, C10, Q2, Q9, Q10, Q14, Q15, A5, A6, X11, F1 | Strong on quantities; missing: bets instead of weights (O4), confidence question after an interval (Q14), one incident is not a frequency (Q15), re-ask an unanswered question (A5), carry the expert's hedge (X11). | Yes but half of it duplicates the default (quantiles). Missing: utilisation probe (Q9), unknown → threshold question (A6), conservation question (F1). | Yes (concretise, contrast). Default quantity techniques are noise here. | **shape** (applicability): 4 of 9 defaults are quantity methods rendered for every plugin. | +| `movements.slice` | technique | 3; C1, C8, S4 | Yes for the walk and the bounded opener; the hypothetical rule (C8) is contradicted by run evidence. | Yes — what one case is. Missing: case notion when several things flow (S4). | Yes — one example. | **wording**: "Escalate hypotheticals only from a real case" over-forbids constructed scenarios that worked. | +| `movements.sweep` | technique | 6; C2, W1, W4, W5, W11, K8 | Yes for stratum sweep, absences, exceptions. K8 clearinghouse contradicts three sources. | Yes — strata are kinds. Missing: exception-type sweep (W11), "what befalls this stratum" close (W5). | Yes but duplicated four ways. | **wording**: default names "step", "resource", "duration" — DES nouns; clearinghouse probe contradiction. | +| `licenses` | license | 6; O8, K1, W8, P10, P12, X3 | Batching, grade, assumption, deferral written. Missing from ADR d.2's own row: press a busy expert, decline to sweep, propose structure as a suggestion (P10, P12). | No — blank in both plugins; nothing in the corpus wants a plugin license. | No. | **missing** (repertoire under-fill); the plugin cell is legitimately empty. Leave the key. | +| `motifs` | attention | 3; W7, R2, M7 | "Ask whether, never assemble" and "Name plus variant" — yes. | Yes, but the cell violates "Name plus variant": six name-only lines that restate patterns. Needs the axis per motif (R2 server semantics, M7 formation rule). | Yes (boundary, happy/unhappy, state-dependent). | **wording** now; **shape** later if machinery consumes parameters (CHANGELOG open item). No key change forced. | +| `smells` | attention | 8; C5, W10, A2, P9, P11, R6, X6, X7 | Value not given, many questions, fluent-and-empty, assent — yes. Missing: schema-shaped questioning (W10, named in ADR d.2), contested fact averaged (P11), a dropped question in a compact answer (X6). | Yes; six good formalism smells. | Yes; three good ones. | **missing** (repertoire under-fill). | +| `rabbit_holes` | anchor | 8; O7, O9, S1, Q8, A3, K5, X5, X8 | Structure-before-responses, stability, depth-off-slice — yes. Missing from ADR d.2's row: asking what you failed to ask, restating the whole model, document for practised rule (X5); plus leading/forced-choice defaults (O9), consulting drift (X8). | Yes; three good ones. Missing: granularity the expert never observes (Q8), eliciting the answer to the objective (A3). | Yes. | **missing** (repertoire under-fill); the ADR's own anti-clearinghouse row is absent while `sweep` licenses the probe. | +| `failure_modes` | anchor | 3; K3, K4, F2 | Eight defaults with signatures — yes; all detection is machinery in fact. | Present; "overconfident triangle" duplicates technique + attribute. Missing: deadlock/unsoundness (F2), needs projection. | Present; "Rule without example" duplicates sweep/P01/check. | **wording** (duplication). Signatures mostly restate `smells`; the two keys differ by frame (named failure vs own-output sign), which authors are not honouring. | +| `kickoff` | procedure | 8; O1, O2, O3, O5, O6, O10, O11, T1 | Objectives, posture, no-structure — yes. Missing: boundaries/scope/horizon (O5, T1), experimental factors (O10), accuracy bar (O11) — all in ADR d.2's row or the opening-five. | Yes; "what no model exists means" is good; it repeats "what better means". Missing: optimisation-question recast (O2), time resolution. | Yes. | **missing** (default omits boundaries the ADR names); "numerically where possible" misfits gherkin/FV. | +| `trajectory` | procedure | 1; C9 | Slice-then-sweep, deepen, ledger, yield — yes. **Missing entirely: posture-varied biases** (ADR d.2). | Yes; kind order. | Yes. | **missing**: the selection half; posture is produced and unconsumed. | +| `close` | procedure | 6; S2, K2, K6, K7, K9, K10 | Honour a stop, read back, deliver losses — yes. Missing: assumptions vs simplifications split (S2). | Yes; deliverable and non-claims good. Missing: named stopping outcomes for construct (K9; present for review only). | Yes (construct); review close blank. | **wording** (construct outcomes unnamed). | +| `ontology` (kinds, not_kinds, attributes) | contract | 4; Q7, R1, A8, M10 | n/a | Yes; ten kinds, three not-kinds, three attributes. | Yes; four kinds. | **shape**: attributes are prose; `source-regime` works only because the harness hard-codes it (elicited-model.ts:47). | +| `schema` (anchor, floor, must_know) | contract | 8; Q5, Q16, P4, P6, P7, R3, M2, M3 | n/a | Yes; 25 rows. Wrong precision word on two rows (P6, R3); a demanded-but-N/A row on the never-asked slot (M2); no row for noise on a dynamics node (Q16). | Yes; 10 rows. | **shape**: single precision word per row; `not_applicable` lets the never-asked row be ticked away. | +| `patterns` | contract | 13; C4, W2, Q6, Q11, Q17, A1, P1, P5, M1, M4, M6, M8, F5 | n/a | Yes; 8 patterns. | Yes; 4 patterns. | **shape**: kind-only matching (cue.ts:40); P01/P02 indistinguishable at fire time; P08 never fires (bug); cross-kind trigger (Q17) inexpressible to the harness. | +| `machinery` | code | 0 | n/a | `slot-assertion` | four check names, nothing consumes them | none for this review; note the lexicon-data gap (§1.3). | +| harness preamble | fixed | 1; X1 | yes | — | — | none. | + +## 3. Proposed key changes for cycle two + +Sparing by intent: no key is added, merged, dropped, split, or renamed. Three shape changes inside existing keys are forced by situations; the rest is content. + +| # | Change | Evidence (situation ids) | Cost to the other plugin | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| 1 | **`patterns.items[*].slot?: string`** — optional; when present the harness surfaces the pattern only if *that* slot on the node is unsatisfied (cue.ts). Also fix `on: []` to mean "any kind" as documented, or forbid the empty list. | Q11 vs M1 (P01 and P02 both fire on any failing `activity`); Q7 (P08 never fires); Q17 (state-dependent rate has no trigger); the archived cards' `Detects` predicates (cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md:44–49) that the migration dropped. | Gherkin: none; P01 gains `slot: the examples that illustrate it`, P03 gains `slot: the observable outcome` — sharper, optional. | +| 2 | **`schema.must_know[*].precision` accepts a list (any-of)**, e.g. `[spread, spelled out]`; the fold satisfies the row at whichever the expert reached. | R3 (a calendar is spelled out; the row demands spread); P6 (a lexicographic rule is spelled out; the row demands range); Q5 (spread fits). Alternative is to split rows, which multiplies rows for one slot. | Gherkin: none; every row stays a single word. FV sketch: none. | +| 3 | **Repertoire entry applicability facet** — optional `for_precision?: [range, spread]` (or a named facet `quantities`) on a repertoire `GuidanceItem`; `renderGuidance` renders the entry only if some `must_know` row of the plugin demands one of those words. Not a plugin override (decision 1 preserved): the harness decides from the plugin's own contract data. | Gherkin/FV misfit of "Mean or tail", "Quantiles", "Clairvoyant test", "Premortem", "What 'better' means, numerically"; §1.3, §1.4. The `Policy versus practice` lens (P3, X2) needs the same mechanism or a conditioned text. | sdcpn: none (it demands `range` and `spread`, so everything renders as today). Gherkin: loses six irrelevant defaults. | + +Content changes forced by the corpus but needing no schema change (record in the changelog as cycle-two edits, not key changes): + +- Repertoire `licenses`: add the three ADR-listed licenses (press a busy expert; decline to sweep; propose structure as a suggestion — P10, P12). Repertoire `rabbit_holes`: add the ADR-listed three (X5, K8 — and decide K8 one way; see §5). Repertoire `smells`: add "schema-shaped questioning" (W10). Repertoire `kickoff`: add boundaries/horizon/experimental factors/accuracy bar (O5, O10, O11, T1). Repertoire `trajectory`: write the posture-varied biases (ADR d.2) or drop posture from `kickoff`. Repertoire `techniques`: O4, Q14, Q15, A5, X11 as candidates — O4 and Q15 have run or literature evidence; the rest wait for a run (decision 7). +- sdcpn: motifs must carry their axis (R2, M7, F5); remove the three restatements of quantile elicitation (Q2); split or re-word `boundary-condition.arrival or availability pattern` pending change 2; consider making `activity.what is lost when it changes the system's mode` not_applicable only *after* the question was asked (M2 — needs the fold to know a slot was addressed, which it does via captures); add lenses X10, T3; add rabbit_holes Q8, A3; add sweep W5, W11; name construct stopping outcomes (K9). +- gherkin: collapse the four statements of "rule without example" to the pattern and the check; keep the sweep line. +- A gate worth adding (test, not schema): a plugin cell whose `text` shares a sentence with a repertoire entry fails — "cells add, never repeat". + +Keys considered for change and left: + +- **`motifs` — parameters as data** (CHANGELOG open item). Left: nothing consumes them; the fix is content ("Name plus variant" honoured). Revisit when a projection or a cue reads motif parameters. +- **Merge `motifs` into `patterns`.** The sdcpn cell makes them look like one thing (six motifs = six patterns). Left: they differ by mechanism (attention scaffold vs matched trigger) and gherkin's motifs ("Boundary") have no pattern twin. The duplication is a content defect of one plugin. +- **Merge `smells` into `failure_modes`.** Signatures restate smells. Left: the ADR's frame distinction (own output vs named failure) is sound; authors are not honouring it. Content. +- **Drop the plugin cell of `licenses`.** Both blank; the corpus wants none. Left: zero cost, and the ADR's condition ("a plugin cell must contradict a default") is better detected with the cell present than absent. +- **Add a `scope` runbook key** for boundaries / include–exclude–justification (O5, S2, T1). Left: `kickoff` (before structure) and `close` (the deliverable's losses) carry it once written; the literature's scope table is a deliverable shape, not a fourth runbook step. +- **Add a fourth movement** (e.g. `cross-examine` for consistency probes, soundness questions — F1, F2). Left: the consistency probe is a `technique`; soundness-to-question needs projection machinery first. +- **Make `ontology.attributes` data** (O10 factor/response). Left: only `source-regime` is consumed and it is hard-coded; promote to a harness field when a second attribute needs the fold, not before. + +## 4. Appendix — situation corpus + +Letter: (a) direction already in the repertoire default; (b) in the sdcpn plugin (cell, row, or pattern); (c) expressible in an existing key but not written; (d) not expressible without a key change. "Key" is the primary carrier; a second carrier is noted after a semicolon. + +| Id | Situation | Source | Key | Letter | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| O1 | Expert asks for "a model" with no question stated; objectives must come first | situation-pack.md:53–63; v0-prompt.md | kickoff | a | +| O2 | First question is an optimisation ("best reshuffle when a line goes down") a simulation cannot answer; recast as comparing candidate policies | condition-1.md:150–156 | kickoff (sdcpn cell) | c | +| O3 | Board metric is binary and hides magnitude; "better" must be co-constructed | condition-2.md:78–99 | kickoff; schema `objective.what "better" means` | a/b | +| O4 | Expert has no exchange rate; interviewer elicits weights by concrete bets, never "what weight" | condition-2.md:100–116; literature §2.1 (swing weighting) | techniques | c | +| O5 | Scope: whole plant because the crew is shared; materials watched but not scheduled — an include/exclude decision with a reason | condition-2.md:52; literature §4.1 | kickoff | c | +| O6 | Posture: "forty minutes before the huddle" | condition-1.md:96 | kickoff | a | +| O7 | Expert disclaims the format; interviewer opens by naming places, transitions and colours | condition-2.md:25 | rabbit_holes (sdcpn) | b | +| O8 | 29-question opening battery | condition-1.md:35–90; readout.md:93–96 | licenses; smells; failure_modes; kickoff | a | +| O9 | Default assumptions pre-filled in brackets before any answer — forced choice | condition-1.md:31,59; literature §5.1 anti-patterns | rabbit_holes | c | +| O10 | Experimental factors (tech shift, third tech, overtime) vs responses — what the expert may vary | literature §1.2 Q3, §1.3; condition-1.md:478 | kickoff; ontology.attributes | c | +| O11 | Accuracy bar and validation target ("match actuals, not the sheet"; replay 26 weeks) set before building | condition-1.md:201,241; literature §1.2 Q4, §4.3 | kickoff; schema `validation-criterion` | b (strain: sdcpn rabbit_hole says do not elaborate) | +| S1 | "The mixing end I care about less" — depth is objective-relative | condition-1.md:106 | rabbit_holes | a | +| S2 | Simplifications (collapse three stages; no lot splitting; identical trucks) vs assumptions (unknown values) — two registers | condition-1.md:265; SDCPN doc §Semiconductor, §Truck fleet; literature §4.1 | close | c | +| S3 | Two sources disagree (scheduler vs engineering on the tank); design an identifying measurement, do not pick | condition-1.md:158–167; literature §5.3 | lenses | c | +| S4 | Case notion: the token is a batch or an order — the flowing unit is a decision the expert confirms | condition-2.md:169–179,550; literature §7.1 item 12 | movements.slice (sdcpn cell) | c | +| C1 | "Walk me through one order end to end, don't tidy it" | condition-2.md:133–159; v0-prompt.md | movements.slice | a/b | +| C2 | Slice narrative volunteers "where it could have gone differently" | condition-2.md:159 | movements.sweep | a | +| C3 | Resource named in passing ("the changeover crew has to be free") | condition-2.md:151 | lenses (sdcpn) | b | +| C4 | Gate named in passing ("materials check"; "not releasable till morning") | condition-2.md:149,341 | patterns P04; motifs | b | +| C5 | A wait named as a stage ("sits in QA hold") | condition-2.md:155 | smells (sdcpn); ontology.not_kinds | b | +| C7 | The narrated case is the smooth one; the bad day needs its own ask | condition-2.md:157–159; literature §2.2 | techniques | a | +| C8 | Four constructed scenarios with invented parameters succeed in eliciting practiced rules | condition-2.md:404–437 | movements.slice | a (default forbids what worked; §5) | +| C9 | Return to a slice when a sweep exposes an uncovered case (the 2am changeover) | condition-2.md:269 | trajectory | a | +| C10 | Straw-man route offered and corrected ("no mid-process QC step") — correction is the capture | condition-1.md:44,112 | techniques | a | +| W1 | One property across one stratum (durations across activities) | condition-2.md:227–249; v0-prompt.md | movements.sweep | a/b | +| W2 | "Does it vary by type?" | condition-2.md:196–217 | patterns P07 | b | +| W4 | Unwritten rules: "what would a new scheduler get wrong in week one" | condition-1.md:199,239; v0-prompt.md | movements.sweep (sdcpn) | b | +| W5 | Maintenance never asked by either condition; no node exists so nothing prompts it | readout.md:123; failure catalogue FM-08 | movements.sweep (sdcpn: close the activity stratum with "what befalls the system") | c | +| W7 | Every contention point swept | v0-prompt.md category 5 | motifs; patterns P05 | b | +| W8 | "Where would that number live?" — historian, CMMS, ERP never pulled | situation-pack.md:99,135 | licenses; ontology `data-binding` | a/b | +| W10 | Schema-shaped questioning (eight-section questionnaire in turn one) | condition-1.md:35–88; ADR d.2 smells row | smells | c | +| W11 | Exception sweep by type: work-item failure, deadline expiry, resource unavailability, external trigger, constraint violation | literature §3.1 | movements.sweep (sdcpn) | c | +| Q1 | "About half a shift", "a couple of hours if we're lucky" | situation-pack.md:23–26 | lenses | a | +| Q2 | Quantiles, never min/mode/max; stated four times in the sdcpn render | v0-prompt.md; condition-1 A6; plugin.yaml:97–101,337–341,412–414 | techniques | a (b duplicates) | +| Q5 | Asymmetric tails ("fat downside, thin upside") | condition-2.md:249 | schema precision `spread` | b | +| Q6 | "Line 2 twice as fast" — true only for whites | situation-pack.md:87–88; condition-2.md:243 | patterns P07; lenses | b | +| Q7 | Standard time vs actual ("matrix says 3h, I've seen 3.5") | condition-2.md:214 | ontology.attributes `source-regime`; P08 | b (P08 never fires) | +| Q8 | Expert has rates per product-per-line, not per stage; pressing for stage-level yields guesses | condition-2.md:237–247 | rabbit_holes (sdcpn); licenses "Name the grade" | c | +| Q9 | Utilisation and variability of the binding resource decide whether stochasticity is earned | condition-2.md:118; literature §6.1–6.3 | techniques (sdcpn) | c | +| Q10 | Clairvoyant test: "changeover hours" includes wait-for-tech or not | condition-1.md:257; literature §1.4 | techniques | a | +| Q11 | Occurrence vs duration for an event ("every week or two, half an hour to half a shift") | condition-1.md:229 | patterns P01 | b | +| Q14 | Confidence question after an interval (IDEA step 4) | literature §1.4; cps-interview-guidance CPS-Q01 | techniques | c | +| Q15 | One memorable outage is not a frequency ("took four days once") | condition-1.md:229; cps-interview-guidance CPS-Q01 Q1 | techniques | c | +| Q16 | Noise on a continuous quantity (draw rate wanders around contract; ambient temperature) | SDCPN doc §SDCPN | schema `dynamics` row | c | +| Q17 | A rate that depends on state (failure rate rises with wear; weakest component decides) | SDCPN doc §Truck fleet | patterns (two-kind trigger) | c (harness cannot match it) | +| A1 | "I don't know exact scrap" → route to the least-burdensome authoritative source | situation-pack.md:84; P02 | patterns P02; licenses | b/a | +| A2 | Unknown becomes placeholder becomes "confirmed" constant | readout.md:149–158 | smells; failure_modes | a | +| A3 | The unknown is the objective itself ("whether idling pays") — do not elicit the answer | situation-pack.md:137 | rabbit_holes (sdcpn) | c | +| A5 | Unanswered question silently becomes a default ("materials never raised as a driver") — re-ask or ledger | readout.md:150 | techniques; smells | c | +| A6 | Convert an unknown into a threshold the expert can eyeball ("as long as scrap > 40 units") | condition-1.md:173–177 | techniques (sdcpn) | c | +| A8 | The data exists nowhere ("nobody's spreadsheet reflects that") | situation-pack.md:91–92 | ontology `data-binding`; licenses | b/a | +| P1 | Two lines want the crew at once | situation-pack.md:75–77 | patterns P05 | b | +| P2 | "Changeovers mostly overlap fine" (belief) vs Tuesdays idle | situation-pack.md:76–77 | lenses; techniques (consistency probe) | a | +| P3 | Prescribed "specialty on 1 and 3" vs practiced "Line 1 only" | condition-1.md:255,379 | lenses; P08 | a/b | +| P4 | What overrides the rule | condition-2.md:431–437 | schema `policy.what overrides it` | b | +| P5 | Tie-break within a priority class (both Meridian) | condition-2.md:455,478 | patterns P05 | b | +| P6 | Lexicographic objective (cliff vs slope) is a spelled-out rule, not a range | condition-2.md:114–131 | schema `objective.what "better" means: range` | b (wrong precision word) | +| P7 | A favour system with a social budget (QA jump 2–3 a month) | condition-2.md:435,482 | schema `policy` row; attribute `quantity` | b | +| P9 | Terminal-state behaviour the expert never stated, inferred then confirmed | condition-2.md:456,480 | smells | a | +| P10 | Interviewer proposes a scoring structure / net skeleton — "tell me where it's wrong" | condition-2.md:94–98,548–556 | licenses | c (ADR d.2 names it) | +| P11 | Two experts disagree on a fact — contested fact, never averaged | literature §5.3 | smells; lenses | c | +| P12 | Decision rule inferred from arithmetic (11:00 wash window) offered as a testable rule | condition-1.md:430–442 | licenses | c | +| R1 | A resource is an entity-type, not a kind | plugin.yaml:84–88 | ontology.not_kinds | b | +| R2 | Crew is one indivisible two-person server for washdowns, splittable for rinses — server semantics | condition-2.md:269,580; condition-1.md:496–498; literature §3.1 | motifs (axis) | c | +| R3 | Availability calendar (day shift; overnight black hole) | condition-2.md:271 | schema `boundary-condition.arrival or availability pattern: spread` | b (wrong precision word) | +| R6 | Shared downstream resource the expert forgot (Saturday production, weekday lab) — an inference to ledger | condition-2.md:459 | smells | a | +| M1 | Changeover asymmetric by direction | situation-pack.md:79–81 | patterns P02 | b | +| M2 | Ramp scrap never asked; the row is `not_applicable: true` so N/A can be ticked without a question | readout.md:132; plugin.yaml:193–196 | schema row; P02 | b (strain) | +| M3 | Whole-line vs cascading changeover — granularity the expert never watched; "I'll go stand at Line 2" is a deposit | condition-2.md:546–567 | schema `ordering/flow`; licenses | b/a | +| M4 | Order → batches; batch size varies by line | condition-2.md:179,247 | patterns P03 | b | +| M6 | Contiguity / interleaving | condition-2.md:290; CPS-Q03 | patterns P03 | b | +| M7 | Batch fires at 4 lots or after 3 hours — formation trigger | SDCPN doc §Semiconductor | motifs "batch"; P03 ask | c | +| M8 | Release gate is an ERP status (credit/allocation hold) | condition-2.md:341 | patterns P04 | b | +| M10 | Setup state rides along with the resource (line "dressed for" a family) | condition-2.md:552 | ontology `entity-type.state that rides along` | b | +| T1 | Horizon: the week, re-juggled daily; plans blow up inside a shift | condition-2.md:52 | kickoff; boundary-condition | c | +| T3 | A duration that depends on the clock (Friday finish → Monday release) | condition-2.md:273 | lenses (sdcpn) | c | +| K1 | "Huddle in ten minutes — how much more do you need?" | condition-2.md:275–295 | licenses "Name the grade"; lenses | a | +| K2 | "I really do have to stop here. Produce the model now." | condition-2.md:625 | close | a | +| K3 | Pleasantry loop after a self-declared "done" | condition-1.md; FM-01 | failure_modes; smells | a (detection is machinery) | +| K4 | Phantom second session | condition-2.md:301–305; FM-03 | failure_modes | a | +| K5 | "What's outstanding is data, not understanding" — stopping on stability | readout.md:26–29 | rabbit_holes | a | +| K6 | Read-back walkthrough for sign-off | literature §4.3 | close | a/b | +| K7 | Never claim the model is loadable or simulated | plugin.yaml:442–446; FM-11 | close (sdcpn) | b | +| K8 | Clearinghouse probe: "what have I not asked?" | v0-prompt.md; literature §5.1; cps-interview-guidance:22–24; condition-3-prompt.md; ADR d.2 rabbit_holes row | movements.sweep | a (contradicted; §5) | +| K9 | Named stopping outcomes for construct | ADR d.2 close row; plugin.yaml:468–471 (review only) | close (sdcpn) | c | +| K10 | Deliver the losses (ledger plus what is left out) | v0-prompt.md | close | a/b | +| X1 | Retraction ("I said rinse before but now I'm not sure") — supersedes, does not average | condition-1.md:234 | harness preamble; lenses | a | +| X2 | Normative answer ("the rule says") | situation-pack.md:124 | lenses | a | +| X3 | "I don't know", plainly | situation-pack.md:27–29 | licenses; P02 | a/b | +| X4 | Domain jargon unexplained ("letdown", "the sheet", "the demand book") — ask, and keep the word | situation-pack.md:20–22; FM-14 signature | lenses | c | +| X5 | Deferring to a document ("the matrix says"; "I'll send the spreadsheet") | condition-2.md:86; condition-1.md:185 | rabbit_holes | c (ADR d.2 names it; sdcpn smell covers policies only) | +| X6 | Expert answers several questions compactly and drops one (dialect question ignored four times) | readout.md:98 | smells; techniques | c | +| X7 | "I hadn't said it out loud like that before" — the interviewer's sharpening confirmed | condition-1.md:379 | smells | a | +| X8 | Interviewer coaches the expert on what to ask logistics — consulting drift | condition-2.md:379–392 | rabbit_holes | c | +| X9 | A document arrives; its facts are propositions to confirm at lower confidence | literature §1.1; condition-1.md:225 | lenses | c | +| X10 | "Always/never" → a constraint or a policy | situation-pack.md:124; gherkin plugin.yaml:145 | lenses (sdcpn) | c | +| X11 | Hedged answer ("don't quote me hard on Line 3") — carry the hedge as confidence | condition-2.md:247 | techniques | c | +| F1 | Conservation law (liquid + ullage = 54) — "what is conserved here?" | SDCPN doc §Plain Petri net; literature §5.1 | techniques (sdcpn); schema `constraint` | c/b | +| F2 | Deadlock in a policy variant — "a state you can reach and never leave: real, or a missing recovery?" | SDCPN doc §Plain Petri net; literature §5.1 soundness | failure_modes (sdcpn) | c (needs projection) | +| F5 | Several dynamics on one entity with a combining rule (weakest component) | SDCPN doc §Truck fleet | patterns P13 extension; motifs | c | + +## 5. Contradictions between sources that the repertoire resolves silently + +1. **Clearinghouse probe.** Licensed: v0-prompt.md ("what am I not asking about? (clearinghouse)"), literature §4.2/§5.1 ("clearinghouse probe as a closing ritual"), repertoire `movements.sweep` "Ask for absences" (repertoire.yaml:75–77: "what have I not asked about that matters here?"). Forbidden: cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md:22–24 ("No card … claims that asking the expert what was missed can discover an unknown omission"), condition-3-prompt.md ("Do not ask the expert what you have failed to ask as a substitute for the diagnostic"), ADR-0007 decision 2 `rabbit_holes` row ("asking the expert what you failed to ask"). The repertoire takes v0's side and omits the ADR's own rabbit-hole row. Either is defensible (the probe is cheap; it is not a coverage mechanism); the repertoire should say which and why, and the ADR row should match. +2. **Quantile order.** v0 and repertoire `techniques` "Quantiles, never three points" (repertoire.yaml:48–50): typical first, then tails. CPS-Q01 (cps-interview-guidance:88–93) explicitly chose the IDEA order — interval first, best guess third, confidence fourth — "over the v0 prompt's typical-first script", and literature §1.4 gives both IDEA (interval-first) and SHELF (median-first). The repertoire uses v0's order while citing "§1.4 (IDEA four-step interval)" as its source. The literature is split; the repertoire should either name the split or cite SHELF. +3. **Batching 2–4.** GEN-Q02 calls it "a deliberate, one-run-vindicated departure from strict one-question guidance"; the repertoire states it as a license with "Five items is a warning" and cites FM-12, which is about the opening battery, not about batch size. The departure and its single-run basis are not stated. +4. **Hypotheticals.** Repertoire `movements.slice` "Escalate hypotheticals only from a real case… A free-floating hypothetical returns the expert's policy" (repertoire.yaml:68–70) vs v0 ("probe with concrete scenarios") and the readout crediting condition 2's four constructed scenarios (condition-2.md:404–437) as the conflict-point delta. Under the default as written, the run's most productive move is a violation. The literature's actual claim is narrower (anchor when possible; prefer cues to decisions). +5. **Restate-to-check vs co-construction.** Repertoire "Restate to check" and smell "Assent taken as origin" (repertoire.yaml:60–62,111–113) say assent to the interviewer's phrasing is not a capture. Condition 2's standout excavation — the cliff/slope penalty — was co-constructed from bets and the interviewer's summary (condition-2.md:124–131), and the expert's "guilty, I was thinking about Monday" (condition-2.md:480) confirms an interviewer inference. The repertoire does not say how a confirmed inference becomes a capture (in the expert's words? a re-statement by them?); FM-15 and the readout's praise are both in the sources. +6. **Structure in the first exchange.** Repertoire `kickoff` "No structure in the first exchange… The bounded opener is a three-to-six-step account of what happens, not a diagram" (repertoire.yaml:167–169) — a three-to-six-step account is structure. The literature has the opening five *then* the bounded task diagram; the repertoire compresses them into one entry that contradicts itself in wording. +7. **Depth on IR-only kinds.** sdcpn `rabbit_holes` "depth on IR-only kinds… do not elaborate them" (plugin.yaml:401–404) covers `validation-criterion`; literature §1.2 Q4 and §4.1 (Sargent) put the accuracy bar and validation data *before* building. The plugin's projection-driven economy and the literature's validity-driven order disagree; the plugin does not say it is choosing. + +Two further inconsistencies inside the design rather than between sources: sdcpn `movements.sweep` orders kinds "`entity-type` through `dynamics` before `objective` through `validation-criterion`" (plugin.yaml:356–359) while `objective` is elicited first by every other rule — readable only if "sweep" is understood as post-kickoff, which the text does not say; and the repertoire renders "Name plus variant" (repertoire.yaml:98–100) immediately above six sdcpn motifs recorded by name alone. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/elicitation-completion.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/elicitation-completion.md index 360fe625d10..aece9e6d2ae 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/elicitation-completion.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/elicitation-completion.md @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ evaluateCompletion(model, mustKnowRows) -> CompletionReport `model` is the register-2 derived model at one target-document revision ([ADR-0003](../adr/0003-three-register-ir.md)). `mustKnowRows` is the parsed `## Must know` table of one plugin file at one plugin version, with the static floor stated under it -([`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md) is the exemplar). The function is pure and reads nothing +([`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml) is the exemplar). The function is pure and reads nothing else: not the transcript, conversation fluency, turn count, delivery state, session state, or a deferral report. Each numbered statement below is a test the implementation must pass; the [plain rendering](../evidence/proofs/design/elicitation-completion-plain.md) explains the same diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/elicitation-kernel.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/elicitation-kernel.md index 64673f46f28..71e01b6dde1 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/elicitation-kernel.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/elicitation-kernel.md @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ carries the operating truth, this map names it; the section itself is not rewrit | §5 envelope, §8 sweep and supersession, §11.1 "own payload structure" | [ADR-0003](../adr/0003-three-register-ir.md): captures are register 1; the elicited model is register 2, derived by a pure fold and never stored; projections are register 3. Envelope semantics unchanged. | | §6.1 `project` for code-bearing targets; §14.1 invariants 3 and 8 | [ADR-0005](../adr/0005-model-assisted-sdcpn-realization.md): the pure projection emits a scaffold, a typed code-obligation sidecar, and the loss report; executable realization is downstream application work. | | §9.5 completion derived, never a gate | [`elicitation-completion.md`](elicitation-completion.md): the invariants of `evaluateCompletion(model, mustKnowRows)` over the plugin file's `Must know` table, under [ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md). | -| §11.1 ElicitationPack (kernel cards, completion contract, clarification hints); §11.2 pack form | [ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md) and [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md): a plugin is one sectioned Markdown file per target formalism with fixed headings (`Purpose · Kinds · Must know · Patterns · Moves · Deliverable`); cards became kind-indexed `Patterns`, the completion contract became the `Must know` table, clarification hints became `Moves` steps. Principle v2 still governs the prose sections. `project`/`validate` remain plugin code ([`plugin-contract.md`](plugin-contract.md)). | +| §11.1 ElicitationPack (kernel cards, completion contract, clarification hints); §11.2 pack form | [ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md) and [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml): a plugin is one sectioned Markdown file per target formalism with fixed headings (`Purpose · Kinds · Must know · Patterns · Moves · Deliverable`); cards became kind-indexed `Patterns`, the completion contract became the `Must know` table, clarification hints became `Moves` steps. Principle v2 still governs the prose sections. `project`/`validate` remain plugin code ([`plugin-contract.md`](plugin-contract.md)). | | §11.5 generic strategy cards | Unchanged in principle (guidance ownership follows vocabulary ownership); still named, not designed (FE-1406). Any harness-generic guidance would take the same `Patterns`/`Moves` shape. | | §13 portfolio and hybrid order ("both packs authored before the pack interface freezes") | [ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md): the interface is the heading contract and the three table grammars; the SDCPN file is authored, the Gherkin file is not; sequencing is owned by [STEERING](../control/STEERING.md). §13.1–13.3 target content is unchanged. | @@ -626,10 +626,11 @@ Bun-workspace monorepo in this repo: ```text packages/core # the harness; plugin SDK is its public export surface packages/core/testing # (subpath) fixtures, arbitraries, replay driver — prod bundles stay clean +packages/repertoire # the harness's own filling of every guidance and runbook key (ADR-0007); depends on core only packages/binding-flue # the Flue binding (implements §10; owns the storage port impl) packages/transport-aisdk # validated UI ingress + harness replies → AI SDK wire; no binding/substrate imports packages/plugin-gherkin -packages/plugin-sdcpn # the SDCPN process-model plugin file and its slot-assertion proposal type (ADR-0006) +packages/plugin-sdcpn # the SDCPN process-model plugin definition and its slot-assertion proposal type (ADR-0006, ADR-0007) packages/plugin-assurance # renamed 2026-08-10 from plugin-proof-obligations (§13.2) apps/dev # owns 'use agent' module, app.ts, db.ts, Vite build ``` @@ -647,6 +648,10 @@ it does not wrap or flatten these package boundaries. a package-manager root: it carries no package manifest, lockfile, or competing toolchain. `apps/brunch-agent` remains at HASH's application root and points back to that context authority. +**ADR-0007 amendment (2026-08-25):** `packages/repertoire` (`@hashintel/brunch-agent-repertoire`) +carries the harness's default teaching for every guidance and runbook key. It depends on `core` +only; bindings depend on it to render instructions; plugins never import it. + **Dependency invariants (spec invariants):** plugins depend on `core` only — never on the binding, never on Flue; the harness imports no substrate; a binding imports both. A transport consumes harness-level reply parts plus its wire encoder and ingress validator only: `transport-aisdk` diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/intermediate-representation-plain.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/intermediate-representation-plain.md index 77de1deea42..6987eace7dd 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/intermediate-representation-plain.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/intermediate-representation-plain.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ > findings on FE-1401 (third accrual), the load-bearing one being the loss report's unresolved unit > of loss (capture vs. capture-facet). > -> Since 2026-08-25, [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md) is the concrete rendering of Layer B: its +> Since 2026-08-25, [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml) is the concrete rendering of Layer B: its > `Kinds` and `Must know` tables carry the ten kinds, the cross-kind attributes, and the > question-relative completion rule described below as the one authored plugin file. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/plugin-contract.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/plugin-contract.md index ab0aa83e37a..c6848777f36 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/plugin-contract.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/plugin-contract.md @@ -1,69 +1,96 @@ -# Spec: the plugin contract — one file per target formalism +# Spec: the plugin contract — one definition per target formalism Status: **provisional**, reshaped 2026-08-25 by -[ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md). Ratification condition (inherited from +[ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md) (a plugin is per formalism, never per +domain) and amended the same day by +[ADR-0007](../adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md) (a plugin is data +under harness-owned keys). Ratification condition (inherited from [ADR-0003](../adr/0003-three-register-ir.md)): a worked pass across at least three plugin -targets on a real fold. Decided on: FE-1405 (registers), FE-1480 (ADR-0005 outputs), and the -2026-08-25 design-convergence review (per-formalism plugin file). The normative exemplar for -every row and column shape named here is [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md); where this -document and that file disagree about shape, the file wins and this document is amended. -The retired declarative draft is archived at +targets on a real fold. Decided on: FE-1405 (registers), FE-1480 (ADR-0005 outputs), FE-1431 +(the key contract), and the 2026-08-25 design-convergence review. The normative exemplars are +[`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml) and +[`plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml`](../../packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml), co-authored against the +same schema; where this document and the schema +([`packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json`](../../packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json), +derived from `PluginDefinitionSchema`) disagree about shape, the schema wins and this document is +amended. The retired declarative draft is archived at [`plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft.md`](../archive/specs/plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft.md). ## What a plugin is A plugin is **per target formalism** — Gherkin, SDCPN — never per domain. It is one authored -Markdown file with fixed section headings, plus a small amount of code for `project` and -`validate`. The harness parses three tables from the file into the model vocabulary, the demand -list, and the pattern index; every other section is concatenated, in order, into the -interviewer's instructions. The end user never edits the file. - -Fixed headings, in this order: `## Purpose` · `## Kinds` · `## Must know` · `## Patterns` · -`## Moves` · `## Deliverable`. Subsections under a heading belong to that section. A plugin file -with a missing, renamed, or reordered contract heading does not load. - -Domain-neutrality rule: nothing in the file may name a domain. A new case that seems to need a -new row is a finding about the abstraction, decided by review, never content added to a plugin. +`plugin.yaml` whose keys are fixed by the harness, plus a small amount of code for `project` and +`validate`. The harness reads the contract keys into the model vocabulary, the demand list, and +the pattern index; it renders every other key into the interviewer's instructions interleaved +with its own teaching — for each key, the harness's definition of the key, then the repertoire's +default, then the plugin's cell. The end user never edits the file. + +The keys fall in four groups (ADR-0007 decision 2), under an identity block `plugin` (`id`, +`version`, `formalism`, `jobs`, `purpose`): + +| group | keys | who fills it | +| ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | +| contract | `ontology` (`kinds`, `not_kinds`, `attributes`), `schema` (`anchor`, `floor`, `must_know`, `proposals`), `patterns` | the plugin alone; the harness reads it as data | +| guidance | `lenses` · `techniques` · `movements{slice,sweep}` · `licenses` · `motifs` · `smells` · `rabbit_holes` · `failure_modes` | repertoire default + plugin cell, concatenated | +| runbooks | `kickoff` · `trajectory` · `close`, once per job the plugin declares (`construct`, `review-and-revise`) | repertoire default + plugin cell, concatenated | +| machinery | `checks` · `tools` | identifiers of harness or plugin machinery; unconsumed in cycle one | + +Every guidance and runbook cell is a list of `{name, text, signature?, source?}` items. A cell +adds to the default; it never overrides it and never restates what the harness enforces. A plugin +may leave any cell blank — the default is then the whole of the key — and may add no key: an +unknown key anywhere fails to load. The catalogue of keys, and the one-paragraph definition the +interviewer reads above each, lives in `packages/core/src/keys.ts`; the catalogue is a working set +until a co-authoring cycle changes no key (ADR-0007 decision 9), with changes recorded in +`packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md`. + +Domain-neutrality rule: nothing in the definition may name a domain. A new case that seems to +need a new row is a finding about the abstraction, decided by review, never content added to a +plugin. ## Relation to the three registers [ADR-0003](../adr/0003-three-register-ir.md) is unchanged. Register 1 is the capture store: envelope-wrapped assertions carrying verbatim forms, hedges, absences, provenance. Register 2 is -the elicited model — a graph of nodes, each of exactly one **kind** from the `Kinds` table, each -with the slots the `Must know` table names for that kind — derived by a pure fold over active +the elicited model — a graph of nodes, each of exactly one **kind** from `ontology.kinds`, each +with the slots `schema.must_know` names for that kind — derived by a pure fold over active captures and never stored. Register 3 is the projections. Write-time-only semantics governs assembly: the fold is forbidden to interpret, so every bridge from user language into a slot is a capture, and the model is a pure function of the store. -## The three machine-read tables - -Column sets are fixed; the exemplar is normative for their names, order, and value vocabularies. - -| table | columns | read as | -| -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -| `## Kinds` | `#`, `kind`, `what it is`, `projects to` | the closed node-kind catalog (Layer-A property 1); `projects to` is documentation for the loss report, not code | -| `## Must know` | `kind`, `slot`, `precision`, `"not applicable" allowed`, `why the model needs it` | one demand row per (kind, slot); `precision` is a word from the file's `Precision words` table | -| `## Patterns` | `id`, `when`, `ask` | discretionary, kind-indexed interviewing patterns; surfaced when a node matches `when` and a slot is unsatisfied | - -Rules the tables carry: - -- Every `Must know` row names a kind present in `Kinds`; every kind has at least one row. -- `precision` maps to an IR grade through the plugin's own `Precision words` table (`named`, - `number`, `range`, `spread`, `spelled out`, `at least N`). Grade means narrowing of - interpretation space, never claim strength. -- The static floor and the completion rule are stated in prose under `## Must know`; the harness - reads the floor's counts, and the rule itself is fixed by - [`elicitation-completion.md`](elicitation-completion.md). -- Cross-kind attributes (`quantity`, `source-regime`, `rationale`) are declared in prose under - `## Kinds` and apply to every kind; a plugin may not scope them to some kinds. +## The contract keys + +Shapes are fixed by the schema; the exemplars are normative for value vocabularies. + +| key | rows | read as | +| ------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | +| `ontology.kinds` | `kind`, `is`, `projects_to` | the closed node-kind catalog (Layer-A property 1); `projects_to` is documentation for the loss report, not code | +| `ontology.not_kinds`| `name`, `text` | things that look like kinds and are not — rendered, never folded | +| `ontology.attributes` | `name`, `on`, `values?`, `text` | cross-kind attributes (`quantity`, `source-regime`, `rationale`, `status`); a plugin may not scope them to some kinds | +| `schema.anchor` | `kind`, `depends_on` | the completion anchor, declared: the kind whose named slot is the dependency slice (was `objective` by convention) | +| `schema.floor` | `kind`, `at_least` | the static floor as counts | +| `schema.must_know` | `kind`, `slot`, `precision`, `not_applicable`, `why` | one demand row per (kind, slot); `precision` is a harness precision word or `at least N` | +| `schema.proposals` | `type`, `payload` | the proposal types the plugin's code declares (`slot-asserted`/`slot-assertion` for a kind-and-slot plugin) | +| `patterns.items` | `id`, `on`, `when`, `ask` | discretionary interviewing patterns indexed by the kinds in `on`; surfaced when a node matches and a slot is unsatisfied | + +Rules the reader enforces beyond the schema: + +- Every `must_know` row names a kind present in `kinds`; every kind has at least one row. +- The anchor's `depends_on` is a `must_know` row on the anchor kind demanding `at least N`. +- `precision` is harness vocabulary (`named`, `number`, `range`, `spread`, `spelled out`, + `at least N`; `PRECISION_LADDER` in core), rendered for every plugin. Grade means narrowing of + interpretation space, never claim strength. A plugin no longer declares its own precision table. +- The completion rule itself is fixed by [`elicitation-completion.md`](elicitation-completion.md); + the plugin supplies only the floor and the anchor. +- Runbooks may be given only for jobs the identity block declares. - Patterns are never mandates. The harness surfaces; the interviewer decides. ## Version binding -The plugin header declares an immutable version string (`sdcpn/2026-08-25.1`). Every completion -evaluation, projection output, and delivered report carries that version together with the -target-document revision it read. A report for one plugin version is not comparable with a model -folded under another; the caller retries rather than mixing them. +The identity block declares an immutable version string (`sdcpn/2026-08-25.2`, +`gherkin/2026-08-25.1`). Every completion evaluation, projection output, and delivered report +carries that version together with the target-document revision it read. A report for one plugin +version is not comparable with a model folded under another; the caller retries rather than +mixing them. The repertoire carries its own version (`repertoire/…`). ## Code operations (ADR-0005 unchanged) @@ -96,51 +123,73 @@ IR slot, fourth register, or plugin operation. `reconcile` remains optional. strength. None substitutes for another. - **The envelope is untouched.** The absence-locator pressure (a field-specific absence cannot name its slot) is adjudicated at the FE-1383 seam, not forked around here. -- **Smallest honest plugin.** A file whose `Kinds` table has one row and whose `Must know` table +- **Smallest honest plugin.** A definition whose `kinds` has one row and whose `must_know` demands one `named` slot must load and run (kernel §11.3). -- **Readability oracle.** Someone who has read `plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md` can write the Gherkin plugin - file by analogy in a sitting. A harness change that breaks this is a regression even if all - tests pass. +- **Readability oracle.** Someone who has read one exemplar can write the other by analogy in a + sitting, and a reader sees the two as siblings rather than one as the template the other was + forced into. A harness change that breaks this is a regression even if all tests pass. +- **Cells add, never override.** No plugin cell may contradict the harness's definition of its + key or restate what the harness enforces; the harness surfaces, and never selects on a plugin's + behalf (ADR-0007 decision 5). ## Testing -The primary seam is still the fold: `fold(pluginFile, activeCaptures) → model`, golden-tested -with hand-worked capture sets in and slot states out. Two gates replace the retired meta-schema -validation: the **plugin-file parse gate** (headings fixed and complete, three tables parse, every -`Must know` kind exists, every precision word is declared) and the **completion fixtures** of -`evaluateCompletion` described in [`elicitation-completion.md`](elicitation-completion.md). -Test-fit order stands: smallest honest plugin, then Gherkin, then SDCPN. +The primary seam is still the fold: `fold(definition, activeCaptures) → model`, golden-tested +with hand-worked capture sets in and slot states out. Gates: the **definition read gate** (schema +match with no unknown key; every `must_know` kind exists; the anchor is a counted row; runbooks +belong to declared jobs), the **shipped-definition gate** (both plugins load, add no key, name no +domain, and declare different anchors under the same schema), the **schema drift gate** +(`plugin.schema.json` equals the emitted view of the valibot schema), the **repertoire gate** +(every key filled, every entry sourced, no formalism or domain word), the **render-order gate** +(preamble → contract → guidance keys in catalogue order → runbooks per declared job; definition +before default before cell), and the **completion fixtures** of `evaluateCompletion` described in +[`elicitation-completion.md`](elicitation-completion.md). Test-fit order stands: smallest honest +plugin, then Gherkin, then SDCPN — with Gherkin and SDCPN authored in the same cycle. ## Open strains (first-class, with owners) -- **Dependency-slice closure (was strain 5).** "The nodes it depends on" is a `Must know` slot on - `objective`; the closure rule over reference-bearing captures still needs one hand-worked pass - before it is machine-read. Owner: FE-1393, with the completion fixtures as consumer. +- **Dependency-slice closure (was strain 5).** `schema.anchor.depends_on` is a `must_know` slot on + the anchor kind; the closure rule over reference-bearing captures still needs one hand-worked + pass before it is machine-read. Owner: FE-1393, with the completion fixtures as consumer. - **Temporal patterns (strain 6, roped off).** Scheduling stays out of scope; calendar algebra is neither claimed nor planned. - **Sweep-time concentration (strain 7).** Write-time-only semantics makes the sweep the single point of semantic failure; mitigations travel with FE-1392/FE-1393/FE-1407. - **Absence locator (envelope pressure #2).** Authority remains the active soft edge in [STEERING](../control/STEERING.md#active-soft-edges). +- **Catalogue convergence (ADR-0007 decision 9).** Which keys survive is decided by co-authoring + cycles, not by this document; cycle-one open questions are listed in + `packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md`. + +## Retired 2026-08-25 by ADR-0007 + +- **Fixed Markdown headings as the contract** (`## Purpose` · `## Kinds` · `## Must know` · + `## Patterns` · `## Moves` · `## Deliverable`): the contract is the schema; the headings the + interviewer reads are rendered from keys. +- **The plugin's own `Precision words` table:** precision is harness vocabulary. +- **`objective` as the anchor by convention:** the anchor is declared under `schema.anchor`, so a + formalism whose completion hangs off a `feature` fits the same reader. +- **`Moves` and `Deliverable` prose sections:** their content is distributed over the guidance + and runbook keys, where the harness's default can be stated once and specialised per plugin. -## Retired 2026-08-25 +## Retired 2026-08-25 by ADR-0006 -Retired by [ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md); the full text survives in -the [archive copy](../archive/specs/plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft.md). +Full text survives in the +[archive copy](../archive/specs/plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft.md). - **Domain-keyed CPS `DemandTable`** (`where(kind, role=…)` scopes, `ROW-BREAKDOWN` and kin): it keyed demands to one baseline case's domain, so every new case needed new rows. - **Typed `ScopeExpr` / `where` / `inSupport` algebra:** demands are now per (kind, slot), and - the objective's dependency slice replaces `inSupport`; the algebra had nothing left to select. + the anchor's dependency slice replaces `inSupport`; the algebra had nothing left to select. - **`ProposalType.affordance.firesWhen` (closed 7-value enum):** patterns are surfaced by a node matching `when` with an unsatisfied slot, which needs no per-proposal predicate. -- **`NodeKind.completionAnchor`:** `objective` is the anchor kind by rule, not by flag. +- **`NodeKind.completionAnchor`:** replaced first by rule, then by the declared `schema.anchor`. - **Typed `foldTable` / `demandTable` / `variantDimension` / `lossCategories` declaration:** the - fold derives from the `Must know` rows, the demand list *is* that table, `source-regime` is a + fold derives from the `must_know` rows, the demand list *is* that key, `source-regime` is a fixed cross-kind attribute, and loss categories are fixed by kernel §6.1. - **Interview cards as separate artifacts:** they became kind-indexed patterns P01–P13 and - `Moves` steps in the plugin file (mapping recorded on the + guidance cells (mapping recorded on the [archived guidance](../archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md)). - **The `ProposalType` catalog and standard-interiors library as plugin-authored declarations:** utterance-shaped proposal interiors remain a harness concern (FE-1392/FE-1393); the plugin - file does not declare them. + declares only which proposal types its code supplies. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-instrument.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-instrument.ts deleted file mode 100644 index 9dbad1d2d4a..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-instrument.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1317 +0,0 @@ -import * as v from "valibot"; - -export const CONDITION_3_INSTRUMENT_VERSION = - "fe-1404-condition-3/2026-08-25.1"; -export const CONDITION_3_DEMAND_TABLE_VERSION = - "cps-baseline-replay/2026-08-24.3"; - -export const CONDITION_3_COMPARISON_HASHES = { - condition1: { - rawSha256: - "e8fdb4705ea5223545a0395f26b32dddaf105e6536ffef1b15feee7f73f0d3dd", - transcriptSha256: - "307eddf906a8ebd280e7cf1eaaadf124fd053a9d82cc651afbc5c760904f9c30", - modelSha256: - "64100739b7668bed749b30f081d4a8fd7149f2b0a21e5791203a7d8dc70f37d2", - }, - condition2: { - rawSha256: - "e50c7b9442758ed97882e843195bb3be1b9f4350a28f0808ee09428cd51c3829", - transcriptSha256: - "230c9f643763a2d58790aef5515f22892cc4a6ed7562f0cdb3816138b05a700c", - modelSha256: - "cd1d7c38773e991d859866af36c2bb13e3c6c68bfff9ce7e0430840c9d0c9eab", - }, -} as const; - -export const CONDITION_3_LOCKED_PATHS = [ - "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/run.ts", - "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-instrument.ts", - "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-prompt.md", - "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-operator.md", - "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-preregistration.md", - "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-scoring.md", - "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-pre-run-review.md", - "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-legibility.md", - "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/protocol.md", - "evaluations/cases/process-model-elicitation/baseline/opening-message.md", - "evaluations/cases/process-model-elicitation/baseline/situation-pack.md", - "docs/specs/elicitation-completion.md", - // Archived 2026-08-25 (ADR-0006): the cards became patterns in docs/specs/sdcpn-plugin.md. - "docs/archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md", - "docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md", - "docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/readout.md", - "docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-1.md", - "docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-1.raw.json", - "docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-1-model.txt", - "docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-2.md", - "docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-2.raw.json", - "docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-2-model.txt", -] as const; - -export const CONDITION_3_OBJECTIVE_ROWS = [ - "ROW-BREAKDOWN", - "ROW-IDLE-WASH", - "ROW-CHANGEOVER", - "ROW-SPLIT", -] as const; - -export type Condition3ObjectiveRow = - (typeof CONDITION_3_OBJECTIVE_ROWS)[number]; - -/** - * Exact FE-1402 design-time `whenObjective` labels. These labels let the - * experiment operator record which frozen row predicate it adjudicated; they - * are not a proposed FE-1431 runtime binding representation. - */ -export const CONDITION_3_OBJECTIVE_MATCH_PREDICATES = [ - { row: "ROW-BREAKDOWN", matchingPredicate: "breakdown-reshuffle" }, - { row: "ROW-IDLE-WASH", matchingPredicate: "idle-vs-washdown" }, - { row: "ROW-CHANGEOVER", matchingPredicate: "changeover-accounting" }, - { row: "ROW-SPLIT", matchingPredicate: "split-run" }, -] as const satisfies readonly { - row: Condition3ObjectiveRow; - matchingPredicate: string; -}[]; - -export const CONDITION_3_PASSING_STATUSES = ["explicit", "inferred"] as const; - -export const CONDITION_3_DEMAND_CLAUSES = [ - { - id: "SF-OBJ", - row: null, - coordinate: "kind(objective)", - demand: "presence count >= 1", - }, - { - id: "SF-ENT", - row: null, - coordinate: "kind(entity-type)", - demand: "presence count >= 2", - }, - { - id: "SF-ACT", - row: null, - coordinate: "kind(activity)", - demand: "presence count >= 1", - }, - { - id: "SF-PATH", - row: null, - coordinate: "kind(ordering/flow)", - demand: "presence count >= 1", - }, - { - id: "SF-FLOW", - row: null, - coordinate: "kind(ordering/flow).sequence", - demand: "grade structured; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "BR-CAP", - row: "ROW-BREAKDOWN", - coordinate: "entity-type[line].capabilities", - demand: "grade structured; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "BR-CAL", - row: "ROW-BREAKDOWN", - coordinate: "boundary-condition[line-calendar].pattern", - demand: "grade structured; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "BR-OCC", - row: "ROW-BREAKDOWN", - coordinate: "dynamics[line-failure].occurrenceFrequency", - demand: "grade range; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "BR-REPAIR", - row: "ROW-BREAKDOWN", - coordinate: "dynamics[line-failure].repairDuration", - demand: "grade quantiles; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "BR-POL", - row: "ROW-BREAKDOWN", - coordinate: "policy[resource-conflict].rule", - demand: "grade structured; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "IW-REL", - row: "ROW-IDLE-WASH", - coordinate: "boundary-condition[order-release].condition", - demand: "grade structured; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "IW-CO-DUR", - row: "ROW-IDLE-WASH", - coordinate: "dynamics[family-changeover].duration", - demand: "grade range; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "IW-LATE", - row: "ROW-IDLE-WASH", - coordinate: "objective[idle-vs-washdown].latenessConsequence", - demand: "grade structured; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "IW-SCRAP", - row: "ROW-IDLE-WASH", - coordinate: "dynamics[family-changeover].rampScrap", - demand: "grade range; status explicit or inferred; no accepted absence", - }, - { - id: "CH-TAX", - row: "ROW-CHANGEOVER", - coordinate: "entity-type[changeover].directionClass", - demand: "grade vocabulary-bound; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "CH-DUR", - row: "ROW-CHANGEOVER", - coordinate: "dynamics[family-changeover].duration", - demand: "grade range; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "CH-CREW", - row: "ROW-CHANGEOVER", - coordinate: "activity[family-changeover].resourceRequirement", - demand: "grade structured; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "CH-SEQ", - row: "ROW-CHANGEOVER", - coordinate: "policy[weekly-sequencing].rule", - demand: "grade structured; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "CH-SCRAP", - row: "ROW-CHANGEOVER", - coordinate: "dynamics[family-changeover].rampScrap", - demand: "grade range; status explicit or inferred; no accepted absence", - }, - { - id: "SP-BATCH", - row: "ROW-SPLIT", - coordinate: "activity[production-run].batchStructure", - demand: "grade structured; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "SP-MIN", - row: "ROW-SPLIT", - coordinate: "constraint[minimum-run-size].threshold", - demand: "grade range; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "SP-ELIG", - row: "ROW-SPLIT", - coordinate: "constraint[line-eligibility].condition", - demand: "grade structured; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "SP-POL", - row: "ROW-SPLIT", - coordinate: "policy[split-contiguity].rule", - demand: "grade structured; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "SP-CO", - row: "ROW-SPLIT", - coordinate: "dynamics[split-run].extraChangeover", - demand: "grade range; status explicit or inferred", - }, - { - id: "SP-SCRAP", - row: "ROW-SPLIT", - coordinate: "dynamics[split-run].repeatedRampScrap", - demand: "grade range; status explicit or inferred; no accepted absence", - }, -] as const satisfies readonly { - id: string; - row: Condition3ObjectiveRow | null; - coordinate: string; - demand: string; -}[]; - -export type Condition3ClauseId = - (typeof CONDITION_3_DEMAND_CLAUSES)[number]["id"]; - -export const CONDITION_3_CARD_IDS = [ - "CPS-Q01", - "CPS-Q02", - "CPS-Q03", - "CPS-Q04", - "CPS-Q05", - "GEN-Q02", -] as const; - -export type Condition3CardId = (typeof CONDITION_3_CARD_IDS)[number]; - -export const CONDITION_3_FIRES_WHEN = [ - "slot-unaddressed", - "below-demanded-grade", - "unspecified-marker-present", - "conflicted-open", - "absence-uncorroborated", - "uniformity-unprobed", - "identity-ambiguous", -] as const; - -export type Condition3FiresWhen = (typeof CONDITION_3_FIRES_WHEN)[number]; - -export const CONDITION_3_ACTIVATION_MATRIX = [ - { - cardId: "CPS-Q01", - clauses: ["BR-OCC", "BR-REPAIR"], - predicates: [ - "slot-unaddressed", - "below-demanded-grade", - "unspecified-marker-present", - ], - }, - { - cardId: "CPS-Q02", - clauses: ["IW-SCRAP", "CH-SCRAP", "SP-SCRAP"], - predicates: [ - "slot-unaddressed", - "below-demanded-grade", - "absence-uncorroborated", - ], - }, - { - cardId: "CPS-Q03", - clauses: ["SP-BATCH", "SP-MIN", "SP-POL", "SP-CO", "SP-SCRAP"], - predicates: ["slot-unaddressed", "below-demanded-grade"], - }, - { - cardId: "CPS-Q04", - clauses: ["IW-REL"], - predicates: [ - "slot-unaddressed", - "below-demanded-grade", - "unspecified-marker-present", - ], - }, - { - cardId: "CPS-Q05", - clauses: ["BR-POL"], - predicates: [ - "slot-unaddressed", - "below-demanded-grade", - "unspecified-marker-present", - ], - }, -] as const satisfies readonly { - cardId: Exclude; - clauses: readonly Condition3ClauseId[]; - predicates: readonly Condition3FiresWhen[]; -}[]; - -export const CONDITION_3_GEN_Q02_LAYER_2 = { - cardId: "GEN-Q02", - verdict: "unobservable", - reason: - "the experiment has no lossless independent-question and pending-large-batch adjudicator; punctuation is not a semantic proxy", -} as const; - -export const CONDITION_3_DIAGNOSTIC_PRIORITY = [ - "SF-ENT", - "SF-ACT", - "SF-PATH", - "SF-FLOW", - "BR-OCC", - "BR-REPAIR", - "IW-SCRAP", - "CH-SCRAP", - "SP-SCRAP", - "SP-BATCH", - "SP-MIN", - "SP-POL", - "SP-CO", - "IW-REL", - "BR-POL", - "BR-CAP", - "BR-CAL", - "IW-CO-DUR", - "IW-LATE", - "CH-TAX", - "CH-DUR", - "CH-CREW", - "CH-SEQ", - "SP-ELIG", - "SF-OBJ", -] as const satisfies readonly Condition3ClauseId[]; - -export const CONDITION_3_STOPPING_RULES = { - forceWrapAt: 20, - hardStopAt: 24, - noProgressAdvisoryAfter: 3, - noProgressHardStopAfter: 5, - impatiencePhase: - "first expert reply after all static-floor clauses pass and at least one objective row is active", - singleSession: - "no later session or external data arrival is available in this experiment", - providerSampling: "default temperature; no seed parameter supported", -} as const; - -export const CONDITION_3_DEMANDED_STATUSES = [ - "none", - ...CONDITION_3_PASSING_STATUSES, - "tentative", - "defaulted", - "external-lookup", - "conflicted", -] as const; - -export const CONDITION_3_DEMANDED_GRADES = [ - "none", - "verbal", - "point", - "vocabulary-bound", - "range", - "structured", - "quantiles", -] as const; - -export const CONDITION_3_FAILURE_DIAGNOSTICS = [ - "below-minimum-count", - "no-selected-slot", - "below-required-grade", - "inadmissible-status", - "unaccepted-absence", - "missing-evidence", - "unaddressed", - "open-conflict", - "unevaluable-divergence", - "unsupported-active-anchor", -] as const; - -const clauseIds = new Set(CONDITION_3_DEMAND_CLAUSES.map(({ id }) => id)); -const Condition3ClauseIdSchema = v.custom( - (value) => - typeof value === "string" && clauseIds.has(value as Condition3ClauseId), - "unknown frozen DemandTable clause", -); -const Condition3EvidenceSchema = v.strictObject({ - turn: v.pipe(v.number(), v.integer(), v.minValue(0)), - quote: v.pipe(v.string(), v.minLength(1)), -}); -const Condition3ActiveObjectiveRowEvidenceSchema = v.variant( - "row", - CONDITION_3_OBJECTIVE_MATCH_PREDICATES.map(({ row, matchingPredicate }) => - v.strictObject({ - row: v.literal(row), - anchorLabel: v.pipe(v.string(), v.minLength(1)), - matchingPredicate: v.literal(matchingPredicate), - evidence: v.pipe(v.array(Condition3EvidenceSchema), v.minLength(1)), - rationale: v.pipe(v.string(), v.minLength(1)), - }), - ), -); -const Condition3RetractedObjectiveAnchorSchema = v.variant( - "row", - CONDITION_3_OBJECTIVE_MATCH_PREDICATES.map(({ row, matchingPredicate }) => - v.strictObject({ - row: v.literal(row), - anchorLabel: v.pipe(v.string(), v.minLength(1)), - matchingPredicate: v.literal(matchingPredicate), - evidence: v.pipe(v.array(Condition3EvidenceSchema), v.minLength(1)), - rationale: v.pipe(v.string(), v.minLength(1)), - resolutionEvidence: v.pipe( - v.array(Condition3EvidenceSchema), - v.minLength(1), - ), - resolutionRationale: v.pipe(v.string(), v.minLength(1)), - }), - ), -); -const unsupportedAnchorBase = { - label: v.pipe(v.string(), v.minLength(1)), - evidence: v.pipe(v.array(Condition3EvidenceSchema), v.minLength(1)), - rationale: v.pipe(v.string(), v.minLength(1)), -}; -const Condition3ActiveUnsupportedObjectiveAnchorSchema = v.strictObject({ - ...unsupportedAnchorBase, - state: v.literal("active"), - demanded: v.literal(true), - pass: v.literal(false), - failureDiagnostic: v.literal("unsupported-active-anchor"), - resolutionEvidence: v.tuple([]), - resolutionRationale: v.null(), -}); -const Condition3RetractedUnsupportedObjectiveAnchorSchema = v.strictObject({ - ...unsupportedAnchorBase, - state: v.literal("retracted"), - demanded: v.literal(false), - pass: v.literal(true), - failureDiagnostic: v.null(), - resolutionEvidence: v.pipe(v.array(Condition3EvidenceSchema), v.minLength(1)), - resolutionRationale: v.pipe(v.string(), v.minLength(1)), -}); -const assessmentBase = { - clauseId: Condition3ClauseIdSchema, - demand: v.string(), - coordinate: v.string(), - evidence: v.array(Condition3EvidenceSchema), - observedCount: v.nullable(v.pipe(v.number(), v.integer(), v.minValue(0))), - rationale: v.string(), -}; - -const Condition3InactiveAssessmentSchema = v.strictObject({ - ...assessmentBase, - demanded: v.literal(false), - currentStatus: v.literal("not-applicable"), - currentGrade: v.literal("not-applicable"), - pass: v.literal(true), - failureDiagnostic: v.null(), - activationPredicates: v.tuple([]), -}); -const Condition3PassingAssessmentSchema = v.strictObject({ - ...assessmentBase, - demanded: v.literal(true), - currentStatus: v.picklist(CONDITION_3_PASSING_STATUSES), - currentGrade: v.picklist(CONDITION_3_DEMANDED_GRADES), - pass: v.literal(true), - failureDiagnostic: v.null(), - activationPredicates: v.tuple([]), -}); -const Condition3FailingAssessmentSchema = v.strictObject({ - ...assessmentBase, - demanded: v.literal(true), - currentStatus: v.picklist(CONDITION_3_DEMANDED_STATUSES), - currentGrade: v.picklist(CONDITION_3_DEMANDED_GRADES), - pass: v.literal(false), - failureDiagnostic: v.picklist(CONDITION_3_FAILURE_DIAGNOSTICS), - activationPredicates: v.array(v.picklist(CONDITION_3_FIRES_WHEN)), -}); - -export const Condition3ProjectionSchema = v.strictObject({ - activeObjectiveRows: v.array(v.picklist(CONDITION_3_OBJECTIVE_ROWS)), - activeObjectiveRowEvidence: v.array( - Condition3ActiveObjectiveRowEvidenceSchema, - ), - retractedObjectiveAnchors: v.array(Condition3RetractedObjectiveAnchorSchema), - unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors: v.array( - v.union([ - Condition3ActiveUnsupportedObjectiveAnchorSchema, - Condition3RetractedUnsupportedObjectiveAnchorSchema, - ]), - ), - assessments: v.array( - v.union([ - Condition3InactiveAssessmentSchema, - Condition3PassingAssessmentSchema, - Condition3FailingAssessmentSchema, - ]), - ), - notes: v.array(v.string()), -}); - -export type Condition3Projection = v.InferOutput< - typeof Condition3ProjectionSchema ->; -export type Condition3Assessment = Condition3Projection["assessments"][number]; - -export const CONDITION_3_VERDICTS = [ - "pass", - "fail", - "mixed", - "unobservable", - "not-applicable", -] as const; - -export const CONDITION_3_RESULT_COMPONENT_IDS = [ - "layer.diagnostic", - "layer.activation", - "layer.evidence-stopping", - "guidance.GEN-Q02.layer-2", - "guidance.GEN-Q02.layer-3", - "guidance.CPS-Q01.aggregate", - "guidance.CPS-Q02.aggregate", - "guidance.CPS-Q03.aggregate", - "guidance.CPS-Q04.aggregate", - "guidance.CPS-Q05.aggregate", - "inherited.interaction-quality", - "inherited.semantic-coverage", - "inherited.stopping", - "inherited.completion", - "stopping.user-request", - "stopping.no-progress", - "stopping.budget", - "inherited.delivery", - "inherited.deposit", - "inherited.deferral", - "inherited.provenance", - "inherited.target-validity", - "bano.question-formulation", - "bano.question-omission", - "bano.order-of-interview", - "bano.communication-skills", - "bano.customer-interaction", - "coverage.objectives", - "coverage.structure", - "coverage.taxonomy", - "coverage.rates-distributions", - "coverage.policies", - "coverage.constraints", - "coverage.boundary-conditions", - "excavation.tacit", - "excavation.belief-correction", - "excavation.unknown-recording", - "signature.FM-01", - "signature.FM-02", - "signature.FM-03", - "signature.FM-04", - "signature.FM-05", - "signature.FM-06", - "signature.FM-07", - "signature.FM-08", - "signature.FM-09", - "signature.FM-10", - "signature.FM-11", - "signature.FM-12", - "signature.FM-13", - "signature.FM-14", - "signature.FM-15", -] as const; - -const nonEmptyResultString = v.pipe(v.string(), v.minLength(1)); -const Condition3ResultComponentSchema = v.pipe( - v.strictObject({ - id: v.picklist(CONDITION_3_RESULT_COMPONENT_IDS), - verdict: v.picklist(CONDITION_3_VERDICTS), - observation: v.nullable( - v.picklist(["observed", "not-observed", "unobservable"]), - ), - evidence: v.array(nonEmptyResultString), - rationale: nonEmptyResultString, - }), - v.check( - ({ verdict, evidence }) => - !(["pass", "fail", "mixed"] as const).includes(verdict as never) || - evidence.length > 0, - "scored condition-3 result components require evidence", - ), -); - -export const Condition3ResultSchema = v.strictObject({ - schemaVersion: v.literal("fe-1404-condition-3-result/2026-08-25.1"), - runRawSha256: v.pipe(v.string(), v.regex(/^[a-f0-9]{64}$/u)), - components: v.array(Condition3ResultComponentSchema), - comparisons: v.strictObject({ - condition1: v.strictObject({ - rawSha256: v.literal(CONDITION_3_COMPARISON_HASHES.condition1.rawSha256), - transcriptSha256: v.literal( - CONDITION_3_COMPARISON_HASHES.condition1.transcriptSha256, - ), - modelSha256: v.literal( - CONDITION_3_COMPARISON_HASHES.condition1.modelSha256, - ), - comparison: nonEmptyResultString, - }), - condition2: v.strictObject({ - rawSha256: v.literal(CONDITION_3_COMPARISON_HASHES.condition2.rawSha256), - transcriptSha256: v.literal( - CONDITION_3_COMPARISON_HASHES.condition2.transcriptSha256, - ), - modelSha256: v.literal( - CONDITION_3_COMPARISON_HASHES.condition2.modelSha256, - ), - comparison: nonEmptyResultString, - }), - }), - amendments: v.array(nonEmptyResultString), - limitations: v.array(nonEmptyResultString), -}); - -export type Condition3Result = v.InferOutput; - -export function assertCompleteCondition3Result(result: Condition3Result): void { - const actualIds = result.components.map(({ id }) => id); - if ( - actualIds.length !== CONDITION_3_RESULT_COMPONENT_IDS.length || - new Set(actualIds).size !== CONDITION_3_RESULT_COMPONENT_IDS.length || - CONDITION_3_RESULT_COMPONENT_IDS.some( - (componentId) => !actualIds.includes(componentId), - ) - ) { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 result must contain every frozen component exactly once", - ); - } - for (const component of result.components) { - if ( - component.id === "guidance.GEN-Q02.layer-2" && - component.verdict !== "unobservable" - ) { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 GEN-Q02 layer-2 verdict is frozen as unobservable", - ); - } - if ( - component.id.startsWith("signature.") !== - (component.observation !== null) - ) { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 signature components require an observation label and non-signature components forbid one", - ); - } - if (component.observation !== null) { - const expectedVerdict = - component.observation === "observed" - ? "fail" - : component.observation === "not-observed" - ? "pass" - : "unobservable"; - if (component.verdict !== expectedVerdict) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 signature observation/verdict mismatch for ${component.id}`, - ); - } - } - } -} - -export const CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE = { - root: { - activeObjectiveRows: [...CONDITION_3_OBJECTIVE_ROWS], - activeObjectiveRowEvidence: - "one transcript-supported anchor record per active objective, including a stable anchorLabel and that row's exact frozen matchingPredicate; multiple anchors may match one row", - retractedObjectiveAnchors: - "durable original and current-turn resolution evidence for previously matched objectives that the expert explicitly retracts", - unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors: - "persistent transcript-supported unsupported objective anchors: active items are demanded failures; retracted items preserve original and current-turn resolution evidence", - assessments: "exactly one assessment per frozen clause", - notes: "string[]", - }, - assessmentStates: { - inactive: - "demanded=false; pass=true; status/grade=not-applicable; observedCount=null; failure=null; activation=[]", - passing: - "demanded=true; pass=true; demanded status/grade; presence observedCount or slot null; failure=null; activation=[]", - failing: - "demanded=true; pass=false; demanded status/grade; presence observedCount or slot null; non-null failure; activation from frozen vocabulary", - }, - vocabularies: { - objectiveRows: [...CONDITION_3_OBJECTIVE_ROWS], - objectiveMatchPredicates: [...CONDITION_3_OBJECTIVE_MATCH_PREDICATES], - statuses: [...CONDITION_3_DEMANDED_STATUSES, "not-applicable"], - grades: [...CONDITION_3_DEMANDED_GRADES, "not-applicable"], - failures: [...CONDITION_3_FAILURE_DIAGNOSTICS], - activationPredicates: [...CONDITION_3_FIRES_WHEN], - }, - template: { - activeObjectiveRows: [], - activeObjectiveRowEvidence: [], - retractedObjectiveAnchors: [], - unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors: [], - assessments: CONDITION_3_DEMAND_CLAUSES.map((clause) => { - const demanded = clause.row === null; - const isPresenceDemand = clause.demand.startsWith("presence count >="); - const slotUnaddressedCanFire = CONDITION_3_ACTIVATION_MATRIX.some( - ({ clauses, predicates }) => - clauses.includes(clause.id as never) && - predicates.includes("slot-unaddressed"), - ); - return { - clauseId: clause.id, - demand: clause.demand, - coordinate: clause.coordinate, - demanded, - currentStatus: demanded ? "none" : "not-applicable", - currentGrade: demanded ? "none" : "not-applicable", - pass: !demanded, - failureDiagnostic: demanded - ? isPresenceDemand - ? "below-minimum-count" - : "unaddressed" - : null, - activationPredicates: - demanded && slotUnaddressedCanFire - ? (["slot-unaddressed"] as const) - : ([] as const), - evidence: [], - observedCount: demanded && isPresenceDemand ? 0 : null, - rationale: "replace with transcript-bounded judgment", - }; - }), - notes: [], - }, -} as const; - -export function parseCondition3Projection( - value: unknown, -): Condition3Projection { - return v.parse(Condition3ProjectionSchema, value); -} - -export function assertCompleteCondition3Projection( - projection: Condition3Projection, -): void { - const expectedIds = new Set(CONDITION_3_DEMAND_CLAUSES.map(({ id }) => id)); - const actualIds = new Set( - projection.assessments.map(({ clauseId }) => clauseId), - ); - if ( - projection.assessments.length !== expectedIds.size || - actualIds.size !== expectedIds.size || - [...expectedIds].some((clauseId) => !actualIds.has(clauseId)) - ) { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 operator projection must assess every frozen DemandTable clause exactly once", - ); - } -} - -function gradeSatisfiesDemand(demand: string, grade: string): boolean { - const requiredGrade = /grade ([a-z-]+)/u.exec(demand)?.[1]; - if (!requiredGrade) return true; - const qualitativeLadder = [ - "verbal", - "vocabulary-bound", - "structured", - ] as const; - const quantitativeLadder = ["point", "range", "quantiles"] as const; - for (const ladder of [qualitativeLadder, quantitativeLadder]) { - const requiredIndex = ladder.indexOf(requiredGrade as never); - if (requiredIndex < 0) continue; - return ladder.indexOf(grade as never) >= requiredIndex; - } - return false; -} - -function presenceMinimum(demand: string): number | null { - const match = /^presence count >= (\d+)$/u.exec(demand); - return match ? Number.parseInt(match[1] ?? "0", 10) : null; -} - -const compatibleFailuresByPredicate = { - "slot-unaddressed": ["missing-evidence", "unaddressed"], - "below-demanded-grade": ["below-required-grade"], - "unspecified-marker-present": [ - "below-required-grade", - "inadmissible-status", - "missing-evidence", - "unaddressed", - ], - "conflicted-open": ["open-conflict"], - "absence-uncorroborated": ["unaccepted-absence"], - "uniformity-unprobed": ["unsupported-active-anchor"], - "identity-ambiguous": ["unevaluable-divergence"], -} as const satisfies Record< - Condition3FiresWhen, - readonly (typeof CONDITION_3_FAILURE_DIAGNOSTICS)[number][] ->; - -const requiredPredicateByFailure: Partial< - Record<(typeof CONDITION_3_FAILURE_DIAGNOSTICS)[number], Condition3FiresWhen> -> = { - "below-required-grade": "below-demanded-grade", - "missing-evidence": "slot-unaddressed", - unaddressed: "slot-unaddressed", - "open-conflict": "conflicted-open", - "inadmissible-status": "unspecified-marker-present", - "unaccepted-absence": "absence-uncorroborated", - "unevaluable-divergence": "identity-ambiguous", -}; - -export function assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics( - projection: Condition3Projection, -): void { - if ( - new Set(projection.activeObjectiveRows).size !== - projection.activeObjectiveRows.length - ) { - throw new Error("condition-3 active objective rows must be unique"); - } - const activeEvidenceRows = projection.activeObjectiveRowEvidence.map( - ({ row }) => row, - ); - const uniqueActiveEvidenceRows = [...new Set(activeEvidenceRows)]; - if ( - uniqueActiveEvidenceRows.length !== projection.activeObjectiveRows.length || - projection.activeObjectiveRows.some( - (row) => !uniqueActiveEvidenceRows.includes(row), - ) - ) { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 active objective rows must equal the unique row projection of active objective anchors", - ); - } - const allObjectiveAnchorLabels = [ - ...projection.activeObjectiveRowEvidence.map(({ anchorLabel }) => - anchorLabel.trim(), - ), - ...projection.retractedObjectiveAnchors.map(({ anchorLabel }) => - anchorLabel.trim(), - ), - ...projection.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors.map(({ label }) => - label.trim(), - ), - ]; - if ( - new Set(allObjectiveAnchorLabels).size !== allObjectiveAnchorLabels.length - ) { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 objective anchor labels must be unique across matched, retracted, and unsupported anchors", - ); - } - if ( - new Set( - projection.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors.map(({ label }) => label), - ).size !== projection.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors.length - ) { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 unsupported active objective anchors must have unique labels", - ); - } - for (const assessment of projection.assessments) { - const minimumCount = presenceMinimum(assessment.demand); - if (minimumCount !== null) { - if (assessment.observedCount === null) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 presence assessment requires observedCount for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - if ( - assessment.currentGrade !== "none" && - assessment.currentGrade !== "not-applicable" - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 presence assessment must not manufacture a grade for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - if (assessment.observedCount > 0 && assessment.evidence.length === 0) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 positive presence count requires transcript evidence for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - if ( - assessment.demanded && - assessment.pass !== assessment.observedCount >= minimumCount - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 presence pass disagrees with observed cardinality for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - if ( - assessment.demanded && - !assessment.pass && - assessment.failureDiagnostic !== "below-minimum-count" - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 failing presence assessment requires below-minimum-count for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - } else if (assessment.observedCount !== null) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 slot assessment forbids observedCount for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } else if ( - assessment.demanded && - !assessment.pass && - assessment.failureDiagnostic === "below-minimum-count" - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 slot assessment forbids below-minimum-count for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - const permittedPredicates = new Set( - CONDITION_3_ACTIVATION_MATRIX.filter(({ clauses }) => - clauses.includes(assessment.clauseId as never), - ).flatMap(({ predicates }) => predicates), - ); - if ( - assessment.activationPredicates.some( - (predicate) => !permittedPredicates.has(predicate as never), - ) - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 activation predicate is incompatible with ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - if ( - assessment.demanded && - !assessment.pass && - assessment.activationPredicates.some( - (predicate) => - !compatibleFailuresByPredicate[predicate].includes( - assessment.failureDiagnostic as never, - ), - ) - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 activation predicate/failure mismatch for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - if (assessment.demanded && !assessment.pass) { - const requiredPredicate = - requiredPredicateByFailure[assessment.failureDiagnostic]; - if ( - requiredPredicate && - permittedPredicates.has(requiredPredicate as never) && - !assessment.activationPredicates.includes(requiredPredicate) - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 required activation predicate ${requiredPredicate} is missing for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - } - if ( - assessment.demanded && - assessment.pass && - (assessment.evidence.length === 0 || - !gradeSatisfiesDemand(assessment.demand, assessment.currentGrade)) - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 passing assessment does not satisfy the frozen evidence/grade demand for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - if ( - assessment.demanded && - !assessment.pass && - assessment.failureDiagnostic === "no-selected-slot" && - assessment.activationPredicates.length > 0 - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 no-selected-slot cannot activate a card for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - if (assessment.demanded && !assessment.pass) { - const hasEvidence = assessment.evidence.length > 0; - const hasStatus = assessment.currentStatus !== "none"; - const hasGrade = assessment.currentGrade !== "none"; - switch (assessment.failureDiagnostic) { - case "below-required-grade": - if ( - !hasEvidence || - !hasStatus || - !hasGrade || - gradeSatisfiesDemand(assessment.demand, assessment.currentGrade) - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 below-required-grade requires evidence and a genuinely sub-demand grade for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - break; - case "missing-evidence": - case "unaddressed": - if (hasEvidence || hasStatus || hasGrade) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 ${assessment.failureDiagnostic} requires empty evidence and none status/grade for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - break; - case "open-conflict": - if (!hasEvidence || assessment.currentStatus !== "conflicted") { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 open-conflict requires conflicted transcript evidence for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - break; - case "inadmissible-status": - if ( - !hasEvidence || - !hasStatus || - CONDITION_3_PASSING_STATUSES.includes( - assessment.currentStatus as never, - ) - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 inadmissible-status requires transcript evidence in a non-passing status for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - break; - case "unaccepted-absence": - if (!hasEvidence) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 unaccepted-absence requires transcript evidence for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - break; - case "no-selected-slot": - if (hasEvidence || hasStatus || hasGrade) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 no-selected-slot requires empty evidence and none status/grade for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - break; - case "unsupported-active-anchor": - throw new Error( - "condition-3 unsupported active anchors belong in unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors, not a frozen clause assessment", - ); - case "unevaluable-divergence": - if (!hasEvidence) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 ${assessment.failureDiagnostic} requires transcript evidence for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - break; - case "below-minimum-count": - break; - } - } - } - const objectivePresence = projection.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SF-OBJ", - ); - const activeObjectiveCount = - projection.activeObjectiveRowEvidence.length + - projection.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors.filter( - ({ state }) => state === "active", - ).length; - if (objectivePresence?.observedCount !== activeObjectiveCount) { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 SF-OBJ observedCount must equal matched plus unsupported active objective anchors", - ); - } -} - -export function assertCondition3UnsupportedAnchorContinuity( - previous: Condition3Projection | undefined, - current: Condition3Projection, - currentTurn: number, -): void { - if (!previous) return; - const currentActiveObjectiveByLabel = new Map( - current.activeObjectiveRowEvidence.map((anchor) => [ - anchor.anchorLabel, - anchor, - ]), - ); - const currentRetractedObjectiveByLabel = new Map( - current.retractedObjectiveAnchors.map((anchor) => [ - anchor.anchorLabel, - anchor, - ]), - ); - for (const priorAnchor of previous.activeObjectiveRowEvidence) { - const currentActive = currentActiveObjectiveByLabel.get( - priorAnchor.anchorLabel, - ); - const currentRetracted = currentRetractedObjectiveByLabel.get( - priorAnchor.anchorLabel, - ); - const currentAnchor = currentActive ?? currentRetracted; - if (!currentAnchor) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 matched objective anchor '${priorAnchor.anchorLabel}' disappeared without a durable retraction`, - ); - } - if ( - currentAnchor.row !== priorAnchor.row || - currentAnchor.matchingPredicate !== priorAnchor.matchingPredicate || - currentAnchor.rationale !== priorAnchor.rationale - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 matched objective anchor '${priorAnchor.anchorLabel}' rewrote its row, predicate, or rationale`, - ); - } - const currentEvidenceKeys = new Set( - currentAnchor.evidence.map(({ turn, quote }) => `${turn}\u0000${quote}`), - ); - if ( - priorAnchor.evidence.some( - ({ turn, quote }) => !currentEvidenceKeys.has(`${turn}\u0000${quote}`), - ) - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 matched objective anchor '${priorAnchor.anchorLabel}' rewrote its original evidence`, - ); - } - if ( - currentRetracted && - !currentRetracted.resolutionEvidence.some( - ({ turn }) => turn === currentTurn, - ) - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 matched objective anchor '${priorAnchor.anchorLabel}' retraction requires current-turn evidence`, - ); - } - } - for (const priorAnchor of previous.retractedObjectiveAnchors) { - const currentAnchor = currentRetractedObjectiveByLabel.get( - priorAnchor.anchorLabel, - ); - if (!currentAnchor) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 retracted objective anchor '${priorAnchor.anchorLabel}' cannot disappear or reactivate`, - ); - } - if ( - currentAnchor.row !== priorAnchor.row || - currentAnchor.matchingPredicate !== priorAnchor.matchingPredicate || - currentAnchor.rationale !== priorAnchor.rationale || - currentAnchor.resolutionRationale !== priorAnchor.resolutionRationale - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 retracted objective anchor '${priorAnchor.anchorLabel}' rewrote durable metadata`, - ); - } - for (const [kind, priorEvidence, currentEvidence] of [ - ["original", priorAnchor.evidence, currentAnchor.evidence], - [ - "resolution", - priorAnchor.resolutionEvidence, - currentAnchor.resolutionEvidence, - ], - ] as const) { - const currentEvidenceKeys = new Set( - currentEvidence.map(({ turn, quote }) => `${turn}\u0000${quote}`), - ); - if ( - priorEvidence.some( - ({ turn, quote }) => - !currentEvidenceKeys.has(`${turn}\u0000${quote}`), - ) - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 retracted objective anchor '${priorAnchor.anchorLabel}' rewrote ${kind} evidence`, - ); - } - } - } - const currentByLabel = new Map( - current.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors.map((anchor) => [ - anchor.label, - anchor, - ]), - ); - for (const priorAnchor of previous.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors) { - const currentAnchor = currentByLabel.get(priorAnchor.label); - if (!currentAnchor) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 unsupported objective anchor '${priorAnchor.label}' disappeared without a durable retraction`, - ); - } - if ( - priorAnchor.state === "retracted" && - currentAnchor.state !== "retracted" - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 unsupported objective anchor '${priorAnchor.label}' cannot reactivate after retraction`, - ); - } - if ( - priorAnchor.state === "active" && - currentAnchor.state === "retracted" && - !currentAnchor.resolutionEvidence.some(({ turn }) => turn === currentTurn) - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 unsupported objective anchor '${priorAnchor.label}' retraction requires current-turn evidence`, - ); - } - if (currentAnchor.rationale !== priorAnchor.rationale) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 unsupported objective anchor '${priorAnchor.label}' rewrote its original rationale`, - ); - } - const currentEvidenceKeys = new Set( - currentAnchor.evidence.map(({ turn, quote }) => `${turn}\u0000${quote}`), - ); - if ( - priorAnchor.evidence.some( - ({ turn, quote }) => !currentEvidenceKeys.has(`${turn}\u0000${quote}`), - ) - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 unsupported objective anchor '${priorAnchor.label}' rewrote its original evidence`, - ); - } - if ( - priorAnchor.state === "retracted" && - currentAnchor.state === "retracted" - ) { - if ( - currentAnchor.resolutionRationale !== priorAnchor.resolutionRationale - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 unsupported objective anchor '${priorAnchor.label}' rewrote its resolution rationale`, - ); - } - const currentResolutionEvidenceKeys = new Set( - currentAnchor.resolutionEvidence.map( - ({ turn, quote }) => `${turn}\u0000${quote}`, - ), - ); - if ( - priorAnchor.resolutionEvidence.some( - ({ turn, quote }) => - !currentResolutionEvidenceKeys.has(`${turn}\u0000${quote}`), - ) - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 unsupported objective anchor '${priorAnchor.label}' rewrote its resolution evidence`, - ); - } - } - } -} - -export function nextCondition3NoProgressStreak( - history: readonly Condition3Projection[], - current: Condition3Projection, - currentTurn: number, - previousStreak: number, -): number { - const priorEvidenceQuotes = new Set([ - ...history - .flatMap(({ assessments }) => assessments) - .flatMap(({ evidence }) => evidence.map(({ quote }) => quote)), - ...history - .flatMap( - ({ unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors }) => - unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors, - ) - .flatMap((anchor) => [ - ...anchor.evidence.map(({ quote }) => quote), - ...(anchor.state === "retracted" - ? anchor.resolutionEvidence.map(({ quote }) => quote) - : []), - ]), - ...history.flatMap(({ activeObjectiveRowEvidence }) => - activeObjectiveRowEvidence.flatMap(({ evidence }) => - evidence.map(({ quote }) => quote), - ), - ), - ...history.flatMap(({ retractedObjectiveAnchors }) => - retractedObjectiveAnchors.flatMap((anchor) => [ - ...anchor.evidence.map(({ quote }) => quote), - ...anchor.resolutionEvidence.map(({ quote }) => quote), - ]), - ), - ]); - const hasNewDemandedEvidence = - current.assessments.some( - (assessment) => - assessment.demanded && - assessment.evidence.some( - ({ turn, quote }) => - turn === currentTurn && !priorEvidenceQuotes.has(quote), - ), - ) || - current.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors.some((anchor) => - (anchor.state === "active" - ? anchor.evidence - : anchor.resolutionEvidence - ).some( - ({ turn, quote }) => - turn === currentTurn && !priorEvidenceQuotes.has(quote), - ), - ) || - current.activeObjectiveRowEvidence.some(({ evidence }) => - evidence.some( - ({ turn, quote }) => - turn === currentTurn && !priorEvidenceQuotes.has(quote), - ), - ) || - current.retractedObjectiveAnchors.some(({ resolutionEvidence }) => - resolutionEvidence.some( - ({ turn, quote }) => - turn === currentTurn && !priorEvidenceQuotes.has(quote), - ), - ); - return hasNewDemandedEvidence ? 0 : previousStreak + 1; -} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-legibility.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-legibility.md deleted file mode 100644 index 1c44d3ecc5d..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-legibility.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,146 +0,0 @@ -# FE-1404 condition-3 second-register rendering and strain record - -## First fresh-context rendering — rejected - -Grade: **C− / not seal-ready**. - -In plain language, condition 3 is one qualitative single-session comparison with conditions 1 and -2. A transcript-only experimental operator evaluates the frozen DemandTable after each expert -answer. The interviewer receives one compact diagnostic; the expert and interviewer do not receive -the full projection. The runner owns the phase impatience stimulus, evidence-delta no-progress -control, and turn budget. GEN-Q02 has no machine layer-2 adjudicator and is evaluated manually only -for resulting interaction behavior. The result is whole-treatment existence evidence, not runtime, -store, plugin, compiler, validation, persistence, or deferral-licensing proof. FE-1431 retains the -authoring-representation decision. - -The first fresh reader found the following strain. This review occurred before the final seal and -before any condition-3 model call. - -| Strain | Pre-seal disposition | -| --- | --- | -| The draft lock was stale and omitted new locked artifacts. | Keep the draft rejected; generate one exact canonical lock only after every remediation and verification step. | -| The supplied template activated `ROW-SPLIT` while marking split clauses inactive. | Generate applicability once and use it for every template discriminant; execute the constructed template in a focused test. | -| Passing `none` states and clause-incompatible activation could survive validation. | Require passing evidence, an accepted status, demand-satisfying grade, and clause-compatible predicates before selection or no-progress. | -| Frame five stopped before the diagnostic or a respectful close reached the interviewer. | Make frame five end questioning, inject a final-delivery instruction, permit exactly the closing interviewer turn, and retain delivery/completion separation. | -| Truncated-interviewer regeneration lacked a seam; terminal failures could resume. | Add that seam type and permit condition-3 resume only for explicitly recoverable states. | -| The result destination lacked an exhaustive machine contract. | Freeze the verdict schema and exact component inventory in the instrument; test completeness. Keep delivery and deposit separate and exempt GEN-Q02 from a CPS three-layer aggregate. | -| Mechanical quote novelty could be overread as semantic improvement. | Name it a live stopping candidate produced by the judgment-bearing operator; score semantic correctness separately and retain this limitation. | -| GEN-Q02 manual scoring, stop precedence, cardless diagnostics, and experiment/runtime terms were underdefined. | Add manual semantic rules, prompt-versus-runner ownership and precedence, cardless `not-applicable` handling, and qualified experimental terminology. | -| Injected impatience text could be cited as expert evidence. | Persist it as labelled experiment stimulus, show it in interaction context, and exclude it from DemandTable quote provenance. | -| “Immutable” described actively rewritten checkpoints. | Reserve immutable for completed source segments; call active files provisional checkpoints. | - -## Second fresh-context rendering — rejected - -Grade: **D / not seal-ready**. This review also occurred before any condition-3 model call. - -| Strain | Pre-seal disposition | -| --- | --- | -| Forced wrap still entered the expert/operator/no-progress path. | At and after turn 20, append only a labelled runner stimulus and proceed directly to the next interviewer turn. Add an execution test proving there are only 19 expert/operator frames. | -| Failing projection coherence was incomplete. | Add failure-specific semantic requirements; in particular, below-grade requires cited evidence and a genuinely sub-demand grade. Reject contradictions before selection or no-progress. | -| The result inventory collapsed card, interaction, coverage, and excavation submeasures and omitted FM-10. | Freeze CPS-Q01–Q05 aggregates, the five Bano dimensions, seven coverage dimensions, three excavation dimensions, and FM-10 as exact machine result rows. | -| Final continuation accepted a truncated non-delivery. | For condition 3, require a `delivered*-incomplete` stop reason before any continuation call; add a refusal test. | -| A pending no-progress close could be silently rewritten at budget exhaustion. | Reserve turns 20–24 for delivery by eliminating expert frames after force wrap; make any remaining pending close at loop exit an instrumentation invariant failure. | -| Unsupported active objectives were unrepresentable. | Add a transcript-supported `unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors` projection field outside frozen DemandTable rows; select its cardless diagnostic first without making an FE-1431 binding decision. | -| Runner-authored stimuli were insufficiently forbidden in operator prose. | Explicitly forbid all `` content as evidence in the operator contract. | -| `retry-required` appeared to be a final verdict. | Remove it from the final verdict domain and retain it only as an intermediate operator-attempt disposition. | - -## Third fresh-context rendering — rejected - -Grade: **D / not seal-ready**. The intentionally stale draft lock was rejected, and the reader found -three additional treatment/scoring strains before any condition-3 model call. - -| Strain | Pre-seal disposition | -| --- | --- | -| Unsupported objective anchors had no explicit unresolved state and could permanently starve frozen failures. | Require `demanded=true`, `pass=false`, and `unsupported-active-anchor`; emit a truthful no-binding demand; diagnose each label once, then resume frozen priority while it remains recorded. | -| A compatible activation predicate could be silently omitted. | Map failure diagnostics to required predicates and reject omission whenever that predicate is available for the clause; execute the generated template and omission case. | -| The result schema allowed GEN-Q02 layer 2 to contradict its frozen unobservable verdict. | Enforce `unobservable` for that exact component in result validation and add a contradiction test. | -| “Semantic no-progress” overstated a mechanical stopping input. | Name the live rule operator-adjudicated quote novelty and keep later semantic correctness scoring separate. | -| The runner synopsis described only legacy in-place continuation. | State the C1/C2 legacy merge and C3 append-only sealed-segment behaviors separately. | - -The rejected draft lock is not remediated in place; it remains chronology evidence until the final -artifact and verification pass. - -## Fourth fresh-context rendering — rejected - -Grade: **D / not seal-ready**. This resumed seal-gate review occurred before any condition-3 model -call and treated the stale draft lock as expected chronology evidence rather than a new finding. - -| Strain | Pre-seal disposition | -| --- | --- | -| `inadmissible-status` required `unspecified-marker-present` but that predicate rejected the failure. | Add `inadmissible-status` to the predicate compatibility table and execute the coherent failure case. | -| Count-only static presence clauses were forced to invent a grade. | Treat absence of a declared minimum grade as no grade requirement; require cited cardinality evidence and permit `currentGrade=none`. | -| CPS-Q03 omitted its reviewed `SP-SCRAP` target. | Restore `SP-SCRAP` to the experiment activation matrix and test the exact reviewed target list. | - -## Fifth fresh-context rendering — rejected - -Grade: **D / not seal-ready**. The review occurred before any condition-3 model call. - -| Strain | Pre-seal disposition | -| --- | --- | -| Presence cardinality was inferred from evidence/grade and could pass a count-two clause with one selected item or reject a truthful zero count. | Add schema-owned `observedCount`; require exact minimum comparison, positive-count evidence, no grade, and `below-minimum-count` for failures. | -| Force wrap was appended after interviewer turn 20. | Inject the labelled stimulus before the turn-20 interviewer call and reserve turns 20–24 without expert/operator/no-progress frames. | -| Successfully stitched non-final interviewer continuations were absent from expert/operator/provider views. | Project source plus every continuation into all semantic request views while retaining append-only persistence seams. | -| Unsupported anchors could disappear or relabel silently across projections. | Persist each label; require active or durable retracted state, current-turn retraction evidence, and no reactivation. | -| `inadmissible-status` still accepted status `none`. | Require a non-`none`, non-passing status with cited evidence. | -| CPS-Q03's regression asserted only membership. | Assert the exact reviewed five-clause target list. | - -## Sixth fresh-context rendering — rejected - -Grade: **D / not seal-ready**, with no blockers and two high-severity strains. The review occurred -before any condition-3 model call. - -| Strain | Pre-seal disposition | -| --- | --- | -| Slot clauses could misuse the presence-only `below-minimum-count` failure. | Forbid that diagnostic whenever the demand has no presence minimum; add a direct rejection test. | -| New evidence for a demanded unsupported anchor did not reset no-progress. | Include active-anchor support and current-turn retraction evidence in operator-adjudicated quote novelty. | -| Anchor support and rationale could be rewritten between projections. | Preserve original label, evidence, and rationale; allow evidence only to append and use separate resolution evidence/rationale. | - -## Seventh fresh-context rendering — rejected - -Grade: **D / not seal-ready**, with one scoring-inventory blocker and four high-severity strains. -The review occurred before any condition-3 model call. - -| Strain | Pre-seal disposition | -| --- | --- | -| The result inventory collapsed completion, user stopping, no-progress, budget, and deferral. | Add separate exact component IDs while retaining delivery/deposit and the aggregate stopping row. | -| Retraction resolution evidence/rationale remained rewritable. | Preserve both append-only after the first retracted projection. | -| Forced-wrap resume regenerated a completed turn and duplicated its stimulus. | Add `forced-wrap-in-progress`; resume advances to the next turn without popping the complete assistant response. | -| Active objective rows lacked their own evidence. | Require exactly one quote/rationale record per active row and validate every quote before applicability. | -| Quote novelty looked back only one projection. | Compute the prior quote set across the complete projection history, including objective-row and unsupported-anchor evidence. | -| C1/C2 comparison inputs were not sealed or hash-bound in results. | Lock the reviewed readout and both raw/transcript/model artifacts; require their hashes in each machine comparison. | - -## Eighth fresh-context rendering — rejected - -Grade: **D / not seal-ready**, with one activation blocker, one high-severity stopping strain, and -one medium-severity result-contract strain. The review occurred before any condition-3 model call. - -| Strain | Pre-seal disposition | -| --- | --- | -| Any genuine quote could activate any objective row because the exact frozen row predicate was not logged. | Add the four exact FE-1402 `whenObjective` labels as a closed row-discriminated registry; require the matching label plus quote/rationale and reject cross-row predicates. This is an experiment adjudication record, not an FE-1431 representation decision. | -| Global duplicate suppression omitted inactive assessment evidence and retracted-anchor evidence. | Build the prior quote set from every assessment plus every anchor's original and resolution evidence, while retaining demanded/current-turn gating for materiality. | -| Scored result rows and comparison prose could be empty. | Require non-empty rationale and comparison text, non-empty evidence strings, and at least one evidence item for every pass/fail/mixed component in the runtime result schema. | - -Focused verification after these dispositions: the instrument and runner suites passed 54/54 with -the loopback permission required by the runner harness; standalone and package TypeScript checks -passed. - -## Ninth fresh-context rendering — rejected - -Grade: **D / not seal-ready**, with one completion-projection blocker, two high-severity runtime -strains, two medium-severity evidence-binding strains, and one stale line. The review occurred -before any condition-3 model call. - -| Strain | Pre-seal disposition | -| --- | --- | -| Unique active rows collapsed multiple active objective anchors and did not reconcile the universal active-anchor check. | Preserve every matched objective under a stable anchor label, allow multiple anchors to project to one unique row, preserve explicit retractions, and require `SF-OBJ.observedCount` to equal matched plus unsupported active anchors. | -| Grade comparison rejected `structured` evidence for the frozen `vocabulary-bound` minimum. | Execute both frozen ladders: `verbal < vocabulary-bound < structured` and `point < range < quantiles`; add a structured-over-vocabulary-bound regression. | -| Recovery imported projection/stopping history without revalidating its semantics. | Reparse every saved projection and revalidate inventory, semantics, transcript quote provenance, matched/unsupported continuity, activation choices, and no-progress state before any recovery call. | -| Result comparison hashes were shape-checked but not bound to the sealed sources. | Freeze exact C1/C2 raw/transcript/model hashes in the instrument and require those literal values in the result runtime schema. | -| The runner-authored single-session correction could be cited as opening evidence. | Store the shared opening as `expertContent`, label the correction as experiment stimulus, and exclude it through the same provenance boundary used for later stimuli. | -| The final-rendering placeholder referenced only seven reviews. | Update chronology to the ninth rejected rendering before the next fresh gate. | - -## Final fresh-context rendering - -Pending after the ninth-review dispositions stabilize. The final lock must include this report and -may not be created until a new fresh reader can render the amended instrument without a blocker or -high-severity strain. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-operator.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-operator.md deleted file mode 100644 index bc64059b7d9..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-operator.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,82 +0,0 @@ -# Condition 3 test-only operator instructions (FE-1404) - ---- - -You are the judgment-bearing test-only completion operator for a preregistered experiment. You are -not the interviewer, a capture store, a runtime completion implementation, or a model -self-inventory mechanism. - -After each simulated-expert answer, assess every clause in the supplied frozen DemandTable using -only the opening message and transcript utterances. Do not use the private situation pack, hidden -answer-key values, prior baseline answers, or likely domain facts. Carry earlier transcript-visible -evidence forward. An interviewer-authored statement is not user evidence; user assent supports only -what the user actually confirms. - -Return JSON only, matching the supplied `PROJECTION_ENVELOPE`. That envelope is emitted from the -same evaluation-runner Valibot schema that owns the TypeScript projection type; its vocabularies and -complete JSON template are authoritative. Include every clause exactly once. Do not add fields. A row clause is -demanded only when its objective is active; set inactive row clauses to pass=true, -currentStatus="not-applicable", currentGrade="not-applicable", failureDiagnostic=null, and no -activation predicates. For demanded clauses, preserve status separately from grade. Unknown or a -future observation is not a value. A no-selected-slot failure must not emit slot-unaddressed because -the reviewed card cannot fire before a coordinate exists. - -Record every active objective anchor separately in `activeObjectiveRowEvidence`, using a stable -`anchorLabel`, one or more verbatim transcript quotes, and a falsifiable rationale. Multiple active -anchors may match the same row. Set `activeObjectiveRows` to the unique rows projected from those -anchor records. Set `matchingPredicate` to that row's exact supplied FE-1402 `whenObjective` label; -the row/predicate pair is a closed discriminated vocabulary, so a predicate belonging to another -row invalidates the whole projection. Set the `SF-OBJ` count to the number of active matched anchors -plus active unsupported anchors; do not collapse multiple objectives into one row or omit an -unmatched objective. Adjudicate the predicate against what the expert actually names as an -objective, not against incidental topic words. Never activate an objective row from topic similarity -or the private situation pack. This match log is experiment evidence, not a proposed FE-1431 -binding representation. - -Preserve each matched anchor's label, row, predicate, original evidence, and rationale in later -projections. If the expert explicitly retracts it, move it to `retractedObjectiveAnchors`, preserve -the original fields, and cite non-empty current-turn `resolutionEvidence` plus a -`resolutionRationale`. Never omit, reactivate, relabel, or rewrite a matched anchor. - -If transcript evidence activates an objective that has no frozen objective row, record it in -`unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors` with a unique short label, one or more verbatim evidence quotes, -and a rationale. Every such item is an unresolved demand: set `state="active"`, `demanded=true`, -`pass=false`, `failureDiagnostic="unsupported-active-anchor"`, `resolutionEvidence=[]`, and -`resolutionRationale=null`. Preserve the same label, original evidence, and original rationale in -every later projection; new supporting evidence may append. If the expert explicitly retracts the -objective, keep the item, set `state="retracted"`, `demanded=false`, `pass=true`, -`failureDiagnostic=null`, and cite the current expert turn in non-empty `resolutionEvidence` with a -non-empty `resolutionRationale`. Never omit, relabel, rewrite, reactivate, or manufacture a -resolution. This is an -experiment-only diagnostic projection, not a new DemandTable row or an FE-1431 binding decision. -Do not force that objective into the closest existing row or put `unsupported-active-anchor` on a -frozen clause assessment. - -The three assessment states are disjoint. Inactive means `demanded=false`, both status and grade -`not-applicable`, `pass=true`, null failure, and no activation. Passing demanded means -`demanded=true`, a demanded-status/grade vocabulary value, `pass=true`, null failure, and no -activation. Failing demanded means `demanded=true`, demanded-status/grade values, `pass=false`, a -failure from the supplied vocabulary, and only activation predicates from the supplied vocabulary. -Passing also requires transcript evidence. A slot demand requires a grade satisfying its frozen -minimum. A count-only presence demand has no grade requirement: use `currentGrade="none"`; do not -manufacture a grade from cardinality. Set `observedCount` to the transcript-supported number of -selected nodes for a presence clause and to `null` for every slot clause. Presence passes exactly -when `observedCount` meets the frozen minimum; zero may correctly have no quote and fails -`below-minimum-count`, while every positive count requires cited evidence. -Activation predicates must be declared for that clause in the frozen experiment matrix; use an -empty array only when the failure has no compatible predicate. When the matrix contains the -failure's matching predicate—such as `below-demanded-grade` for `below-required-grade`—include it; -omission invalidates the projection. The runner rejects the whole projection before it can affect -selection or no-progress if any row violates these rules. - -Activation predicates are limited to the supplied seven-value FE-1405 vocabulary and must describe -the visible state exactly. Typical mappings are: an existing selected slot with no value may emit -slot-unaddressed; a stated value below the demand may emit below-demanded-grade; a transcript marker -such as "roughly" or an unresolved placeholder may emit unspecified-marker-present; an explicit -unknown-to-user answer may emit absence-uncorroborated because this DemandTable accepts no absence. -Do not invent a predicate merely to make a card fire. - -Every evidence item must quote the transcript exactly and name its interviewer-turn number. Keep -rationale short and falsifiable. Content enclosed in `` is runner-authored and -must never be quoted or treated as expert evidence. Notes may identify operator uncertainty; they -may not amend the instrument. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-pre-run-review.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-pre-run-review.md deleted file mode 100644 index 996ec6a830a..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-pre-run-review.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,129 +0,0 @@ -# FE-1404 condition-3 pre-run review record - -No external model call occurred before either review. No condition-3 transcript, raw trace, operator -trace, or result existed. The draft lock SHA-256 -`d308db20c73debd4b0c30e592f73a0975569064c2dfc2ec95a43e15a733fb5c0` is rejected pre-run evidence, -not a historical experiment seal. - -## Review A — experiment contract and trace integrity - -| Finding | Disposition before reseal | -| --- | --- | -| No-progress could reset on operator regrading, row drift, quote order, or evidence-array length. | Replace with a set-based delta over demanded evidence quoted from the new expert frame; add onset, reset, advisory, hard-stop, equal-length replacement, duplicate, reorder, and row-drift tests. | -| The operator received no explicit result envelope, vocabularies, or template. | Send the runtime schema's complete vocabulary and a concrete full-clause JSON template in the constructed operator request; inspect that request in tests. | -| GEN-Q02 used question-mark counting as a semantic proxy. | Remove the proxy and record layer-2 activation as `unobservable` in this run; retain the reviewed batching guidance and score its layer-3 transcript behavior manually, including imperative questions and permitted cohesive five-item groups. | -| Resume and continuation were not seal-bound and could rewrite prior evidence. | Validate seal hash, instrument/DemandTable versions, and exact model config before an API call. Write recovery segments to new raw/transcript paths and retain truncation/continuation seams. | -| The three verdict layers lacked an operational scorer contract. | Freeze verdict domain, authority, procedure, component failure/retry/unobservable rules, aggregation, and result paths in `condition-3-scoring.md`. | -| Runner synopsis still described only two conditions. | Reconcile the synopsis and usage text while retaining C1/C2 behavior. | -| Draft chronology allowed independent pre-run timestamps. | Require sealedAt and finalized lock mtime to postdate every locked file; reject an early self-declared sealedAt. | - -## Review B — TypeScript and runtime-boundary audit - -| Finding | Disposition before reseal | -| --- | --- | -| Manifest verification accepted missing, extra, duplicate, and empty row sets. | Make one canonical path list authoritative and require exact one-to-one manifest identity before hashing files. | -| Projection types and validation had dual ownership and contradictory states were representable. | Make one Valibot discriminated schema the runtime/type owner. Infer TypeScript types and reject incoherent pass/failure/activation/status states before selection or no-progress. | -| Evidence citations were not checked against the supplied transcript. | Validate every quote against the exact opening or expert turn it names; invalid projections retry and then fail visibly. | -| Condition-3 stopping constants were duplicated in the runner. | Use the frozen instrument's values for condition 3 and explicitly named legacy constants for conditions 1 and 2. | -| Compatibility and failure-path coverage was too narrow. | Exercise C1 and C2, exact-manifest failures, seal mismatch on both recovery modes, malformed/contradictory operator output, quote provenance, phase-triggered impatience, operator-adjudicated quote-novelty stopping, and canonicalized evidence order. | - -## Type source-of-truth disposition - -1. **Operator projection** — canonical source: `Condition3ProjectionSchema` — action: **infer**. - Runtime parsing and TypeScript state space share one discriminated Valibot owner. -2. **Instrument vocabularies and manifest paths** — canonical source: exported `as const` registries - in `condition-3-instrument.ts` — action: **import/project**. The runner and tests do not restate - their literal unions. -3. **Checkpoint and recovery segment** — canonical source: runner-local persistence boundary — - action: **keep-local**. These types add experiment-specific durable semantics not owned by the - provider SDK or plugin contract. - -## Review C — second-register stopping and scoring audit - -| Finding | Disposition before reseal | -| --- | --- | -| Forced wrap was being reclassified as expert evidence. | Route it only as a labelled runner stimulus after turn 20; prohibit expert/operator calls and no-progress updates on those turns. | -| Failure discriminants admitted contradictory evidence/status/grade combinations. | Add failure-specific semantic checks and retry/fail before a projection can affect selection. | -| Machine result rows omitted card/submeasure aggregates and FM-10. | Expand the exact frozen inventory to five CPS card aggregates, five interaction dimensions, seven coverage dimensions, three excavation dimensions, and all FM-01–FM-15 signatures. | -| Continuation and budget terminality had permissive fallbacks. | Continue only classified deliveries and turn an impossible pending-close budget exit into an explicit invariant failure. | -| Unsupported active objective anchors had no lossless projection. | Add a schema-owned, quote-validated cardless diagnostic envelope outside the frozen row set; do not infer an FE-1431 binding. | -| Runner stimuli and retry state were ambiguous in prose. | Forbid stimulus provenance in the operator contract and keep `retry-required` outside the final verdict domain. | - -## Review D — fresh unsupported-anchor and result-coherence audit - -| Finding | Disposition before reseal | -| --- | --- | -| Unsupported active anchors lacked unresolved liveness and could starve frozen diagnostics. | Give each anchor explicit demanded/failing state, diagnose each label once, preserve it in later projections, and return to frozen diagnostic priority without claiming a binding. | -| Compatible card activation could be silently omitted. | Require the failure-corresponding predicate whenever that predicate exists for the clause; reject before selection or no-progress. | -| GEN-Q02 layer 2 could receive a verdict other than the frozen `unobservable`. | Enforce that component-specific invariant in the machine result validator. | -| Quote novelty was described as semantic no-progress. | Describe it as an operator-adjudicated live stopping input and score semantic improvement only after observation. | - -## Review E — resumed seal-gate semantic audit - -| Finding | Disposition before reseal | -| --- | --- | -| `inadmissible-status` could neither include nor omit its required predicate. | Reconcile the predicate/failure compatibility table and add a coherent-case regression test. | -| Static presence demands were assigned a manufactured grade requirement. | Preserve presence as cardinality-only: cited evidence is required, but `currentGrade=none` passes when the frozen demand declares no minimum grade. | -| CPS-Q03's reviewed `SP-SCRAP` target was absent from the activation matrix. | Restore the exact target without making a multiplicity or FE-1431 representation decision. | - -## Review F — cardinality, turn-boundary, and continuity audit - -| Finding | Disposition before reseal | -| --- | --- | -| Presence clauses lacked selected-node cardinality and mishandled truthful zero counts. | Add schema-owned `observedCount` and enforce cardinality, provenance, grade-none, and below-minimum failure invariants. | -| Turn-20 force wrap reached only turn 21. | Inject before the twentieth interviewer call and prevent every later expert/operator/no-progress frame. | -| Stitched non-final interviewer continuations were dropped from later semantic views. | Recompose all pieces at the provider boundary and in expert/operator views without rewriting stored source pieces. | -| Unsupported anchor labels lacked cross-projection continuity. | Require persistent active/retracted records, current-turn retraction evidence, and monotonic retraction. | -| Inadmissible evidence could retain status `none`. | Require a cited non-passing epistemic status. | - -## Review G — clause-kind and anchor-materiality audit - -| Finding | Disposition before reseal | -| --- | --- | -| Slot clauses accepted the presence-only `below-minimum-count` diagnostic. | Forbid it outside count demands and test the exact invalid state. | -| New support for a demanded unsupported anchor did not reset no-progress. | Include active-anchor evidence and current-turn retraction evidence in the frozen quote-novelty rule. | -| Unsupported-anchor evidence and rationale were mutable across projections. | Make original label/evidence/rationale append-only and separate durable resolution evidence/rationale. | - -## Review H — result-vector, activation-provenance, and recovery audit - -| Finding | Disposition before reseal | -| --- | --- | -| Independent completion/stopping/deferral results were absent. | Add distinct completion, user-stop, no-progress, budget, and deferral rows to the exact result inventory. | -| Retraction resolution provenance was mutable. | Preserve resolution evidence/rationale append-only after retraction. | -| Forced-wrap resume regenerated the completed prior turn. | Persist a dedicated resumable state and advance without popping or duplicating the prior turn/stimulus. | -| Objective-row activation was not evidence-bearing. | Add one exact quote/rationale record per active row and validate it before demand applicability. | -| Duplicate suppression looked back one projection only. | Build novelty against the entire prior projection history. | -| C1/C2 comparison evidence was not sealed/hash-bound. | Lock the prior readout/raw/transcript/model inputs and embed exact source hashes in comparison results. | - -## Review I — exact row matching, global novelty, and result evidence audit - -| Finding | Disposition before reseal | -| --- | --- | -| Objective rows cited transcript evidence but did not log or constrain the exact frozen `whenObjective` match. | Import the four FE-1402 labels into a closed row-discriminated registry. Require the exact row/predicate pair with quote/rationale, reject cross-row pairs in the runtime schema, and explicitly avoid choosing an FE-1431 binding representation. | -| Duplicate suppression excluded evidence once recorded on inactive assessments or retracted anchors. | Build novelty from every historical assessment quote and both original and resolution evidence for every historical unsupported anchor. Only new current-turn evidence on a currently demanded surface resets the streak. | -| Machine result validation admitted empty scored evidence, rationale, and comparison prose. | Make non-empty strings structural schema requirements and require at least one evidence citation for every pass/fail/mixed component. | - -## Review J — objective cardinality, ladders, and recovery semantics audit - -| Finding | Disposition before reseal | -| --- | --- | -| Unique active rows collapsed multiple active anchors and left the universal active-anchor count unreconciled. | Preserve every matched active objective as a stable anchor record, derive unique rows from those records, preserve explicit retractions, and reconcile `SF-OBJ` to matched plus unsupported active anchors. | -| The qualitative grade ladder was implemented as exact equality. | Execute both frozen qualitative and quantitative ladders and test that structured evidence satisfies a vocabulary-bound minimum. | -| Recovery trusted saved projection, selection, and no-progress state after checking only configuration binding. | Reparse and semantically replay the full operator history against the transcript before importing it; reject edited state before any resumed call. | -| C1/C2 result hashes were not exact literals. | Freeze the six reviewed source hashes in the instrument and require exact values in the machine result schema. | -| The runner-authored single-session correction was inside the admissible opening evidence string. | Preserve the common opening as expert evidence, label the correction as experiment stimulus, and exclude it from quote validation. | - -## Fresh-context legibility review - -The first second-register rendering graded the draft C− / not seal-ready. It found an invalid -operator template, incomplete semantic coherence checks, a no-progress close that never reached the -interviewer, missing recovery terminality/seams, and an underspecified result file. The complete -rendering, strain list, and evidence-backed dispositions are preserved in -`condition-3-legibility.md`. The draft remained unsealed and no condition-3 call occurred. - -## Gate - -The next seal is permitted only after every row above is implemented, formatting passes, focused -tests pass uncached, the full Brunch unit suite passes uncached, type/lint/build and documentation -checks pass, and the lock chronology verifier passes. The approved temporary dependency symlink is -removed after the final applicable post-run verification and before handoff. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-preregistration.lock.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-preregistration.lock.json deleted file mode 100644 index 4d2ee783d30..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-preregistration.lock.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,50 +0,0 @@ -{ - "version": "fe-1404-condition-3/2026-08-25.1", - "sealedAt": "2026-08-25T05:46:59Z", - "files": [ - { - "path": "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/run.ts", - "sha256": "9b91791de955b42c866b3bc7585dd4d22a2aa3f837fe320de845a2b1d50c4a90" - }, - { - "path": "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-instrument.ts", - "sha256": "6acebc39558af16803876240ee062e6fbe684ac7a1cb2a9d17706d132a273d7c" - }, - { - "path": "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-prompt.md", - "sha256": "a07648dd8721e9cce9356fbb34f154acf07ce2c86ca6f11d8e0bc92b4cfa8850" - }, - { - "path": "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-operator.md", - "sha256": "d481dca97dc3035dbddc5792012f5b04394538e454b7dce08b8202e1507ce365" - }, - { - "path": "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-preregistration.md", - "sha256": "7ccbf35313bee3df3ca1b230687984ed3e291531d1b722782b1b0ffb0b815f27" - }, - { - "path": "evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/protocol.md", - "sha256": "77db6117f7f1d8819bd7dd346fea4c81608e171a187f13b86d917d89cb0bd20a" - }, - { - "path": "evaluations/cases/process-model-elicitation/baseline/opening-message.md", - "sha256": "84ec5faa5fd46699c008b3b2aad49eb9988b8c2ab039c8e147fdb077d562ef54" - }, - { - "path": "evaluations/cases/process-model-elicitation/baseline/situation-pack.md", - "sha256": "4dbeb44a881c4675ec0ce7a5f068ea46ce1a4968a405b2dd692f92816d33e083" - }, - { - "path": "docs/specs/elicitation-completion.md", - "sha256": "f076dd6f50b7a901cecbe7310f62bcaefc6987de4667c928711d26b861ddf67d" - }, - { - "path": "docs/archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md", - "sha256": "f434eb101a8087d5227589e6fed7505cdaa5a70e828681ae9f12341fc1a6dcf6" - }, - { - "path": "docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md", - "sha256": "1d6b4e9ddc684b61067ca6575ffdad3dab8c741acd24b73525e5a14b8cecf279" - } - ] -} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-preregistration.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-preregistration.md index b5f0d55a2bd..6a5067d8dde 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-preregistration.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-preregistration.md @@ -1,5 +1,21 @@ # FE-1404 condition-3 preregistration +> **Amendment, 2026-08-25 — retired, never run.** Condition 3 was superseded before its first model +> call by ADR-0007: the completion-and-guidance treatment it preregistered is now the shipped +> harness (keys, repertoire, plugin cells, fold, computed completion), which the baseline protocol +> exercises directly as condition 5 rather than through a hand-run operator projection. Nothing +> below this note is altered. +> +> **Amendment, 2026-08-26 — instrument deleted.** The instrument this document preregistered — +> `condition-3-instrument.ts`, its lock, `condition-3-operator.md`, `condition-3-scoring.md`, +> `condition-3-legibility.md`, `condition-3-pre-run-review.md`, the condition-3 paths in +> `run.ts`, and its unit test — was removed from the tree. Salvage was assessed and none taken: +> its projection schema and semantic validators encoded the domain-keyed DemandTable that S-007 +> ruled the wrong level, and the kind-level fold and `evaluateCompletion` in `packages/core` now +> do that job on the production path. This document and `condition-3-prompt.md` remain as the +> record; the deleted files are in git history under this directory. The file paths named below +> therefore no longer resolve. + Status: **frozen before the first model call**. The lock file beside this document records hashes for the complete treatment and instrument. Any later change requires an explicit amendment; the original run and original lock remain immutable. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-scoring.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-scoring.md deleted file mode 100644 index 46f8131623d..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-scoring.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,124 +0,0 @@ -# FE-1404 condition-3 frozen scoring contract - -Status: preregistered before observation. This contract scores one qualitative run; it does not -estimate an effect size or reliability rate. - -## Fixed destinations - -- Narrative comparison and signature verdicts: - `docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-readout.md` -- Machine-readable component and aggregate results: - `docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-result.json` -- Provisional active checkpoints and immutable completed source segments, transcript, operator - projections/attempts, and delivered model: - `docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/condition-3*` - -## Verdict domain - -Every scored component receives exactly one verdict: - -- `pass`: all frozen checks for the component are supported by the named evidence. -- `fail`: at least one frozen check is contradicted and no retry rule applies. -- `mixed`: separately named subchecks contain both pass and fail results; never average them away. -- `unobservable`: the protocol lacks the authority or signal needed to judge the claim. -- `not-applicable`: the triggering state never occurs, so no behavior was demanded. - -`retry-required` is an intermediate operator-attempt disposition, not a final result verdict. -Preserve the failed attempt and apply the preregistered retry rule. A later valid projection makes -the diagnostic-instrumentation component `mixed`; three failed attempts make it `fail`. - -## Scorer and authority - -The FE-1404 experiment producer performs the first fixed scoring pass from the immutable transcript, -raw trace, operator trace, frozen DemandTable, prior condition transcripts/readout, and FE-1407 -catalogue. The producer may not use the situation pack to repair operator diagnostics. The situation -pack is used only for the inherited excavation checks after the transcript is fixed. - -The coordinator's independent experiment/replay review is the acceptance authority. A disagreement -is recorded per component and adjudicated against quoted evidence; it is not resolved by changing -the scoring contract or transcript. The producer's first-pass result remains visible. - -## Layer procedures - -### Layer 1 — diagnostic correctness - -For every operator projection, check the selected clause and all changed demanded assessments: - -1. the objective row is active from transcript-visible objectives; -2. the coordinate and demand exactly match the frozen table; -3. status and grade describe the cited expert evidence independently; -4. failure diagnostic follows the FE-1402 evaluation rule; -5. every quote is verbatim at its named opening/expert turn; and -6. no interviewer-authored, operator-authored, situation-pack, or prior-run value supplies evidence. - -Any invalid projection has the intermediate disposition `retry-required` until the third failed -attempt. Exhaustion is `fail` for -instrumentation and stops the run before the projection influences selection or no-progress. Later -valid retry output does not erase the failed attempt: the diagnostic-instrumentation component is -`mixed`, while the validated projection proceeds to ordinary layer scoring. - -### Layer 2 — activation/deactivation correctness - -For each frozen CPS binding, evaluate every declared predicate against the validated projection. -`pass` requires lossless clause and predicate match, correct deactivation after the demand passes, -and no pre-coordinate fire on `no-selected-slot`. A mismatch is `fail`. No card activation verdict -is derived from topical relevance. - -GEN-Q02 has no lossless independent-question/pending-large-batch adjudicator in this experiment. -Its layer-2 semantic activation is therefore always `unobservable`; question-mark punctuation is -not a substitute. Its reviewed batching guidance remains part of the treatment and is scored only -at layer 3. E19 quick-rinse provenance and GEN-Q01 remain outside the matrix. - -### Layer 3 — resulting evidence and stopping behavior - -For each selected CPS diagnostic, compare the next interviewer move and later expert evidence with -the card's smallest expected delta. Score whether the question applies the reviewed card without -inventing evidence, whether the demanded status/grade changes, and whether the card deactivates. -An honest `unknown-to-user` may be a behavioral pass while the DemandTable clause remains failing. - -Score GEN-Q02 manually from semantic independent questions, response-frame cohesion, and expert -burden. Requests are independent when each can be answered without the others; imperative or -colon-led requests count without `?`. A frame is cohesive when one shared scope and answer shape -lets the expert answer it as one artifact. A cohesive five-item frame may pass. More than five is -not automatically a failure, and two-to-four is not a universal optimum. Mark burden observed only -from an explicit expert cue or a clear abandoned/partial response; otherwise say not observed. - -Score no-progress from the live operator-adjudicated quote-novelty rule over demanded evidence in -each new expert frame. Quote novelty has stopping consequences but does not itself prove semantic -improvement. Regrading, row drift, quote reorder/duplication, plans, promises, acknowledgements, and -burden cues do not reset it. New support for a demanded unsupported objective anchor, or -current-turn evidence explicitly retracting it, is material; anchor labels, original evidence, and -original rationale remain append-only across projections. -Delivery terminates the session and never retroactively resets the expert-frame streak or changes -completion. Score user stopping, no-progress, budget, delivery, deposit, and deferral separately. - -From interviewer turn 20 onward, force-wrap content is a labeled runner-authored experiment -stimulus, not an expert frame. It cannot be submitted to the operator or update no-progress. This -reserves turns 20–24 for delivery; a fifth non-material expert frame can arise no later than turn 19, -so its one required closing interviewer response remains inside the frozen budget. - -## Failure, unobservable, and aggregation rules - -- Operator parse/schema/provenance failure: retry up to three attempts; then stop with preserved raw - attempts. Do not select a diagnostic or update no-progress from invalid output. -- Classifier or provider truncation: preserve the original marker. Resume or continuation must use a - new seal-bound segment; otherwise `fail` instrumentation and make no call. -- Store, sweep, support-link, durable delivery, re-entry, deferral licensing, production projection - validation, compilation, simulation, and production affordance claims are `unobservable` here. -- A frozen CPS card's aggregate is `pass` only when layers 1, 2, and 3 pass. It is `fail` if layer 1 or 2 fails, - or layer 3 contradicts the card. It is `mixed` when valid activations have different layer-3 - results. `unobservable` does not convert to pass. GEN-Q02 has no three-layer card aggregate: report - its frozen layer-2 `unobservable` and manual layer-3 verdict separately. -- The run aggregate is a vector, never one numeric score: diagnostic layer, activation layer, - evidence/stopping layer, completion, user-requested stopping, no-progress stopping, budget - stopping, inherited interaction, semantic coverage, delivery, deposit, deferral, provenance, and - target validity. The exact verdict vocabulary, result schema, and exhaustive component IDs - (including each applicable FE-1407 signature) are owned by `Condition3ResultSchema` and - `CONDITION_3_RESULT_COMPONENT_IDS` in `condition-3-instrument.ts`; - `assertCompleteCondition3Result` rejects missing or duplicate rows. Report every component plus - comparison with C1 and C2. Each comparison embeds the exact prior raw, transcript, and model - SHA-256 values frozen as literal schema inputs; a merely well-shaped placeholder is invalid. - Those prior artifacts and the reviewed readout are sealed inputs. Signature rows - also carry their required observational label: - `observed` maps to verdict `fail`, `not-observed` maps to `pass`, and `unobservable` maps to - `unobservable`; non-signature rows forbid that label. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-4-prompt.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-4-prompt.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b0a9f0b2c6b --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-4-prompt.md @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +# Condition 4 prompt (teaching layer as prompt only) + +The ADR-0007 teaching layer with no machinery behind it: the interviewer receives the harness's +rendering of the repertoire and the SDCPN plugin definition — the contract keys, every guidance +key with its harness definition, default, and plugin cell, and the `construct` runbook — exactly +as the binding would render them, preceded by this framing. The framing stands in for the +harness's preamble, which describes captures, folds, and completion reports this run does not +have. The rendered text follows the separator at run time and is written beside the transcript as +`condition-4-system.md`. Its delta against condition 2 measures what the fixed keys and the +repertoire buy over the seven-category prompt; its delta against a harness-in-the-loop run +measures what the machinery buys over the text. + +--- + +You are an expert process-model elicitor. Your job is to interview a domain expert about an +operational system and then produce a simulatable process model. The expert knows their +operation deeply but is not a modeller; most of what the model needs is in their head, some of it +in forms they have never had to articulate. + +What follows is the interviewing method you work by. It was written for an interviewer working +inside a harness that keeps the model, records every value as a capture from the expert's words, +and computes completion. In this session there is no harness: you keep that record yourself. + +- Treat the **Must know** rows as the checklist the harness would otherwise compute. Keep a + running private tally of which slots, for which nodes, you have at the precision demanded, and + which you do not; consult it before every question. Where the method refers to "the completion + report", it means this tally. +- Where the method refers to "a capture" or "the model the harness holds", it means your own + notes: record a value only when you can point to the expert's words that gave it, at the + precision they gave it. Never promote a vague answer to a precise one without asking. +- Keep an explicit numbered assumption ledger for any value or rule you supply that the expert + did not state — why it was assumed and how to check it. +- Completion is what the **Must know** section defines — the floor, then every node in each + objective's dependency slice satisfied at its demanded precision — not a feeling that the + conversation is done. + +When the interview is complete, or when the expert stops, produce: (a) the model, in the most +faithful representation the target formalism allows, with every element named in the expert's +own vocabulary and each demanded slot's value and precision stated; (b) the assumption ledger; +(c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out, what remains unknown, and why. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/harness-run.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/harness-run.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9e7a9036227 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/harness-run.ts @@ -0,0 +1,891 @@ +/** + * Baseline condition 5 — the harness in the loop. + * + * The same simulated expert, probes, and turn budget as conditions 1–4, but + * the interviewer is the shipped SDCPN elicitor running in the Flue runtime + * with the binding's machinery: the `ask` suspension, the settlement nudge, + * the private `sweep` extraction into the capture store, and the harness's + * computed completion. The runner plays the expert and the clock. It reads + * every harness fact from durable history and the capture store, never + * interpolates into the interviewer's instructions, and needs no delivery + * classifier: the deliverable is the capture store, folded, and the + * interviewer ends its own turn-taking by replying without a question. + * + * This is the JS-API workflow pattern the Flue routing table names for a loop + * that drives an agent through turns: `start()`, then `send()`/`wait()`/ + * `history()` through the SDK client over the app's own router. + * + * Usage, from `apps/brunch-agent` after `turbo run build` for the workspace: + * + * yarn baseline:harness + * + * Environment: + * + * ANTHROPIC_API_KEY both models (pi-ai reads it for the interviewer) + * BRUNCH_SDCPN_MODEL interviewer model id; this runner defaults it to claude-opus-5 + * BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE test-only stand-in for the expert's Anthropic client + * BRUNCH_BASELINE_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE test-only pi provider module (default export) for the interviewer + * BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR test-only output directory; requires both stand-ins + * + * Artifacts (beside the other conditions' transcripts unless the test directory is set): + * + * condition-5.md the readable transcript, harness facts interleaved + * condition-5.raw.json every turn record, the Flue history snapshot, the store, and usage + * condition-5-model.md the capture store folded into the elicited model, with the completion report + * condition-5-captures.json the capture-store snapshot verbatim + * condition-5-system.md the interviewer's instructions, reconstructed with the binding's own functions + */ + +import { cp, mkdir, mkdtemp, readFile, rm, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises"; +import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; +import { join } from "node:path"; +import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; + +import { observe } from "@flue/runtime"; +import { start } from "@flue/runtime/node"; +import { + createFlueClient, + type FlueConversationMessage, + type FlueConversationSnapshot, +} from "@flue/sdk"; + +import { + askProtocolInstructionFragments, + buildCompletionCueSignal, + buildSweepList, + completionDemands, + evaluateCompletion, + foldElicitedModel, + pendingAskAffordanceId, + renderInstructions, + settlementProtocolInstructionFragments, + toolName, + type CaptureStoreSnapshot, + type CompletionReport, + type ElicitedModel, + type SlotState, +} from "@hashintel/brunch-agent"; +import { + createLocalCaptureStore, + projectFlueHistoryForSweep, +} from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-binding-flue"; +import { sdcpn, sdcpnDefinition } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn"; +import { repertoire } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-repertoire"; + +import type Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"; +import type { Provider } from "@earendil-works/pi-ai"; + +// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- +// Protocol constants — identical to conditions 1, 2, and 4 (run.ts). +// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +const CONDITION = "5"; +const EXPERT_MODEL = "claude-sonnet-5"; +const DEFAULT_INTERVIEWER_MODEL = "claude-opus-5"; +const FORCE_WRAP_AT = 20; +const HARD_STOP_AT = 24; +const IMPATIENCE_AT = 8; +const IMPATIENCE_LINE = + "(Sorry — I've just seen the time, I have the floor huddle in ten minutes. How much more do you need?)"; +const FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE = + "I really do have to stop here. Please produce the model now with everything you have."; +/** Consecutive interviewer turns without a question, before the wrap, that end the run. */ +const STALL_AFTER_TURNS_WITHOUT_ASK = 3; +const EXPERT_MAX_TOKENS = 1_500; + +// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- +// Environment and stand-ins. +// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +const testOutputDirectory = process.env["BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR"]; +const expertClientModule = process.env["BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE"]; +const interviewerProviderModule = + process.env["BRUNCH_BASELINE_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE"]; +const apiKey = process.env["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"]; + +if (testOutputDirectory && !(expertClientModule && interviewerProviderModule)) { + console.error( + "BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR requires BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE and BRUNCH_BASELINE_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE", + ); + process.exit(1); +} +if (!apiKey && !(expertClientModule && interviewerProviderModule)) { + console.error("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is not set"); + process.exit(1); +} + +// The elicitor pins its model at module load, so the override must be in the +// environment before the agent module is imported (below, dynamically). +process.env["BRUNCH_SDCPN_MODEL"] ||= DEFAULT_INTERVIEWER_MODEL; +const interviewerModel = process.env["BRUNCH_SDCPN_MODEL"]; + +// The capture store lands in a run-private directory; the snapshot is copied +// out as an artifact at the end. Set before the agent's first render. +const targetDocumentDirectory = await mkdtemp( + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-baseline-c5-"), +); +process.env["BRUNCH_DEV_TARGET_DOCUMENT_DIR"] = targetDocumentDirectory; + +const caseDir = fileURLToPath( + new URL( + "../../../cases/process-model-elicitation/baseline/", + import.meta.url, + ), +); +const transcriptDir = + testOutputDirectory ?? + fileURLToPath( + new URL( + "../../../../docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/", + import.meta.url, + ), + ); + +// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- +// Records. +// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +interface ExpertMessage { + readonly role: "user" | "assistant"; + readonly content: string; +} + +interface Usage { + input: number; + output: number; + cacheRead: number; + cacheWrite: number; + calls: number; +} + +export interface HarnessSweepRecord { + readonly status: string; + readonly appliedCaptureIds?: readonly string[]; + readonly skippedDedupKeys?: readonly string[]; + readonly advisories?: readonly unknown[]; + readonly refusal?: unknown; + readonly completion?: unknown; +} + +export interface HarnessCompletionRecord { + readonly captures: number; + readonly complete: boolean; + readonly unsatisfied: number; + readonly outsideSlice: number; + readonly unmapped: number; + readonly revision: string; + readonly cue: string; +} + +export interface HarnessTurnRecord { + readonly turn: number; + /** Assistant text parts, in order, across every response in the turn. */ + readonly text: readonly string[]; + readonly asks: readonly { + readonly question: string; + readonly toolCallId: string; + readonly rejected?: string; + }[]; + readonly sweeps: readonly HarnessSweepRecord[]; + readonly signals: readonly { + readonly tagName: string; + readonly excerpt: string; + }[]; + readonly toolErrors: readonly { + readonly toolName: string; + readonly errorText: string; + }[]; + readonly settlement?: "failed" | "aborted"; + /** The one question left open for the expert, if any. */ + readonly pendingQuestion?: string; + /** The harness's read-time completion over the capture store after this turn. */ + readonly completion: HarnessCompletionRecord; + /** What the expert was then sent: their reply, or a stimulus. */ + readonly expert?: { + readonly content: string; + readonly stimulus?: string; + readonly truncated?: boolean; + }; +} + +export interface HarnessRunRecord { + readonly startedAt: string; + readonly condition: typeof CONDITION; + readonly interviewerModel: string; + readonly expertModel: string; + readonly conversationId: string; + readonly stopReason: string; + readonly turns: readonly HarnessTurnRecord[]; + readonly usage: { readonly interviewer: Usage; readonly expert: Usage }; + readonly history: FlueConversationSnapshot; + readonly store: CaptureStoreSnapshot; +} + +// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- +// The expert (unchanged from run.ts: same model, same pack, thinking off). +// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +interface BaselineAnthropicClient { + messages: { + create( + request: Anthropic.MessageCreateParamsNonStreaming, + ): Promise; + }; +} + +let anthropic: BaselineAnthropicClient | undefined; +async function getAnthropic(): Promise { + if (anthropic) return anthropic; + anthropic = expertClientModule + ? ((await import(expertClientModule)).default as BaselineAnthropicClient) + : (new (await import("@anthropic-ai/sdk")).default({ + apiKey, + maxRetries: 5, + timeout: 30 * 60 * 1000, + }) as BaselineAnthropicClient); + return anthropic; +} + +const expertUsage: Usage = { + input: 0, + output: 0, + cacheRead: 0, + cacheWrite: 0, + calls: 0, +}; + +async function callExpert( + system: string, + messages: readonly ExpertMessage[], +): Promise<{ text: string; truncated: boolean }> { + let tokenBudget = EXPERT_MAX_TOKENS; + for (let attempt = 1; attempt <= 5; attempt++) { + const response = await ( + await getAnthropic() + ).messages.create({ + model: EXPERT_MODEL, + max_tokens: tokenBudget, + thinking: { type: "disabled" }, + system, + messages: messages.map((message) => ({ ...message })), + }); + expertUsage.calls += 1; + expertUsage.input += response.usage.input_tokens; + expertUsage.output += response.usage.output_tokens; + expertUsage.cacheRead += response.usage.cache_read_input_tokens ?? 0; + expertUsage.cacheWrite += response.usage.cache_creation_input_tokens ?? 0; + const text = response.content + .filter((block) => block.type === "text") + .map((block) => block.text) + .join("\n"); + if (text.trim() === "") { + tokenBudget *= 2; + console.error( + ` expert: empty text, retrying with max_tokens=${tokenBudget}`, + ); + continue; + } + return { text, truncated: response.stop_reason === "max_tokens" }; + } + throw new Error("expert: exhausted retries"); +} + +// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- +// Reading harness facts out of durable history and the store. +// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +const ASK_TOOL = toolName("ask"); +const SWEEP_TOOL = toolName("sweep"); + +const excerpt = (text: string, length = 240): string => + text.length > length ? `${text.slice(0, length)}…` : text; + +const questionOf = (output: unknown): string | undefined => + typeof output === "object" && + output !== null && + "payload" in output && + typeof output.payload === "object" && + output.payload !== null && + "question" in output.payload && + typeof output.payload.question === "string" + ? output.payload.question + : undefined; + +const sweepRecordOf = (output: unknown): HarnessSweepRecord => { + const record = ( + typeof output === "object" && output !== null ? output : {} + ) as Record; + return { + status: typeof record["status"] === "string" ? record["status"] : "unknown", + ...(Array.isArray(record["appliedCaptureIds"]) + ? { appliedCaptureIds: record["appliedCaptureIds"] as string[] } + : {}), + ...(Array.isArray(record["skippedDedupKeys"]) + ? { skippedDedupKeys: record["skippedDedupKeys"] as string[] } + : {}), + ...(Array.isArray(record["advisories"]) + ? { advisories: record["advisories"] as unknown[] } + : {}), + ...("refusal" in record ? { refusal: record["refusal"] } : {}), + ...("completion" in record ? { completion: record["completion"] } : {}), + }; +}; + +/** Everything the interviewer did between two of our dispatches. */ +function readTurn( + messages: readonly FlueConversationMessage[], +): Omit { + const text: string[] = []; + const asks: HarnessTurnRecord["asks"][number][] = []; + const sweeps: HarnessSweepRecord[] = []; + const signals: HarnessTurnRecord["signals"][number][] = []; + const toolErrors: HarnessTurnRecord["toolErrors"][number][] = []; + let settlement: HarnessTurnRecord["settlement"]; + for (const message of messages) { + if (message.settlement) settlement = message.settlement.outcome; + if (message.role === "system") { + const tagName = message.signal?.tagName ?? message.purpose; + const body = message.parts + .flatMap((part) => (part.type === "text" ? [part.text] : [])) + .join(""); + signals.push({ tagName, excerpt: excerpt(body) }); + continue; + } + if (message.role !== "assistant") continue; + for (const part of message.parts) { + if (part.type === "text") { + if (part.text.trim().length > 0) text.push(part.text); + continue; + } + if (part.type !== "dynamic-tool") continue; + if (part.toolName === ASK_TOOL) { + const input = part.input as { question?: unknown } | undefined; + const question = + (part.state === "output-available" && questionOf(part.output)) || + (typeof input?.question === "string" ? input.question : ""); + asks.push({ + question, + toolCallId: part.toolCallId, + ...(part.state === "output-error" + ? { rejected: part.errorText } + : {}), + }); + } else if (part.toolName === SWEEP_TOOL) { + if (part.state === "output-available") { + sweeps.push(sweepRecordOf(part.output)); + } else if (part.state === "output-error") { + toolErrors.push({ + toolName: part.toolName, + errorText: part.errorText, + }); + } + } else if (part.state === "output-error") { + toolErrors.push({ toolName: part.toolName, errorText: part.errorText }); + } + } + } + return { + text, + asks, + sweeps, + signals, + toolErrors, + ...(settlement === undefined ? {} : { settlement }), + }; +} + +const demands = completionDemands(sdcpnDefinition); + +function readCompletion(store: CaptureStoreSnapshot): { + model: ElicitedModel; + report: CompletionReport; + record: HarnessCompletionRecord; +} { + const model = foldElicitedModel(store, sdcpnDefinition); + const report = evaluateCompletion(model, demands); + const sweepList = buildSweepList(model, report, sdcpnDefinition.patterns); + return { + model, + report, + record: { + captures: model.activeCaptureIds.size, + complete: report.complete, + unsatisfied: report.failures.length, + outsideSlice: report.outsideSlice.length, + unmapped: model.unmapped.length, + revision: report.revision, + cue: buildCompletionCueSignal(model, report, sweepList).body, + }, + }; +} + +// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- +// Rendering. +// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +const yesNo = (value: boolean): string => (value ? "yes" : "no"); + +function renderSlot(slot: SlotState): string { + switch (slot.state) { + case "value": + return `${JSON.stringify(slot.value)} — ${slot.precision}, ${slot.status}${ + slot.sourceRegime ? `, ${slot.sourceRegime}` : "" + }${slot.evidenced ? "" : ", unevidenced"}${ + slot.rationale ? ` — _${slot.rationale}_` : "" + }`; + case "absence": + return `absence: ${slot.absence}${slot.pointer ? ` → ${slot.pointer}` : ""} (${slot.status})`; + case "conflict": + return `conflict — ${slot.readings.length} readings`; + case "divergence": + return `divergence — prescribed ${JSON.stringify( + slot.prescribed.assertion.assertion, + )}; practiced ${JSON.stringify(slot.practiced.assertion.assertion)}`; + } +} + +function renderModel( + model: ElicitedModel, + report: CompletionReport, + completion: HarnessCompletionRecord, +): string { + const lines: string[] = [ + "# Condition 5 — the elicited model, folded from the capture store", + "", + "The harness's own deliverable: `foldElicitedModel` over the active captures, then", + "`evaluateCompletion` against the sdcpn definition. Nothing here was written by the", + "interviewer; every value is a capture the sweep extracted and the store admitted.", + "", + `- Plugin version: \`${model.pluginVersion}\``, + `- Revision: \`${model.revision}\``, + `- Active captures: ${completion.captures}`, + `- Complete: **${yesNo(report.complete)}** — ${report.failures.length} unsatisfied, ${report.outsideSlice.length} node(s) outside every objective's slice, ${model.unmapped.length} unmapped capture(s)`, + "", + "## Nodes", + ]; + const order = new Map( + sdcpnDefinition.kinds.map((row, index) => [row.kind, index] as const), + ); + const byKind = new Map(); + for (const node of model.nodes) { + const list = byKind.get(node.kind) ?? []; + list.push(node); + byKind.set(node.kind, list); + } + const kinds = [...byKind.keys()].sort( + (a, b) => (order.get(a) ?? 99) - (order.get(b) ?? 99), + ); + if (kinds.length === 0) lines.push("", "_No nodes._"); + for (const kind of kinds) { + const nodes = byKind.get(kind)!; + lines.push("", `### ${kind} (${nodes.length})`); + for (const node of nodes) { + lines.push("", `#### \`${node.id}\``); + for (const [slot, state] of Object.entries(node.slots)) { + lines.push(`- **${slot}** — ${renderSlot(state)}`); + } + } + } + lines.push("", "## Completion report", ""); + if (report.failures.length === 0) lines.push("_No unsatisfied demands._"); + for (const failure of report.failures) { + lines.push( + `- [${failure.diagnostic}] ${failure.message}${ + failure.nodeId + ? ` (\`${failure.nodeId}\`${failure.slot ? ` — ${failure.slot}` : ""})` + : "" + }`, + ); + } + if (report.outsideSlice.length > 0) { + lines.push("", "## Outside every objective's slice", ""); + for (const node of report.outsideSlice) { + lines.push(`- \`${node.nodeId}\` — ${node.open.length} open`); + } + } + if (model.unmapped.length > 0) { + lines.push("", "## Unmapped captures", ""); + for (const unmapped of model.unmapped) { + lines.push(`- \`${unmapped.captureId}\` — ${unmapped.reason}`); + } + } + lines.push( + "", + "## The harness's cue at close", + "", + "```", + completion.cue, + "```", + ); + return `${lines.join("\n")}\n`; +} + +const formatUsage = (usage: Usage): string => + `${usage.input} in (+${usage.cacheWrite} cache write, +${usage.cacheRead} cache read) / ${usage.output} out across ${usage.calls} calls`; + +function renderTranscript( + run: HarnessRunRecord, + openingMessage: string, + sweepTally: { applied: number; refused: number; noRange: number }, +): string { + const last = run.turns.at(-1)?.completion; + const header = [ + "# Baseline control — condition 5 (the harness in the loop)", + "", + `- Run started: ${run.startedAt}`, + `- Interviewer: ${run.interviewerModel} as the shipped SDCPN elicitor in the Flue runtime — binding-flue's ask, settlement nudge, sweep, fold, and completion (instructions reconstructed in condition-5-system.md)`, + `- Simulated expert: ${run.expertModel} + situation-pack.md`, + `- Interviewer turns: ${run.turns.length} (impatience probe at ${IMPATIENCE_AT}, forced wrap at ${FORCE_WRAP_AT}, hard stop ${HARD_STOP_AT})`, + `- Stop reason: ${run.stopReason}`, + last === undefined + ? "- Harness at close: no turn completed" + : `- Harness at close: ${last.captures} active captures; complete ${yesNo(last.complete)}; ${last.unsatisfied} unsatisfied; ${last.unmapped} unmapped; sweeps applied ${sweepTally.applied}, refused ${sweepTally.refused}, no settled range ${sweepTally.noRange}`, + `- Tokens: interviewer ${formatUsage(run.usage.interviewer)}; expert ${formatUsage(run.usage.expert)}`, + "", + "Harness facts are set off as `> harness —` lines: tool calls the interviewer made, signals the", + "harness appended, and the read-time completion over the capture store after each turn. The", + "expert never sees them.", + "", + "---", + "**Opening message**:", + "", + openingMessage, + ]; + const body = run.turns.map((turn) => { + const parts: string[] = ["---", "", "**Interviewer**:", ""]; + if (turn.text.length === 0 && turn.asks.length === 0) { + parts.push("_(no visible text this turn)_"); + } + parts.push(...turn.text.flatMap((text) => [text, ""])); + for (const signal of turn.signals) { + parts.push( + `> harness — signal \`${signal.tagName}\`: ${signal.excerpt.replaceAll("\n", " ")}`, + ); + } + for (const sweep of turn.sweeps) { + const completion = sweep.completion as + | { complete?: boolean; unsatisfied?: number } + | undefined; + parts.push( + `> harness — sweep ${sweep.status}${ + sweep.appliedCaptureIds + ? `; applied ${sweep.appliedCaptureIds.length}` + : "" + }${sweep.skippedDedupKeys?.length ? `; skipped ${sweep.skippedDedupKeys.length}` : ""}${ + sweep.advisories?.length + ? `; advisories ${sweep.advisories.length}` + : "" + }${sweep.refusal ? `; refusal ${JSON.stringify(sweep.refusal)}` : ""}${ + completion + ? `; completion complete=${yesNo(completion.complete === true)} unsatisfied=${completion.unsatisfied ?? "?"}` + : "" + }`, + ); + } + for (const error of turn.toolErrors) { + parts.push( + `> harness — tool error \`${error.toolName}\`: ${error.errorText}`, + ); + } + for (const ask of turn.asks.filter((candidate) => candidate.rejected)) { + parts.push( + `> harness — ask rejected: ${ask.rejected} (question: ${excerpt(ask.question, 120)})`, + ); + } + if (turn.settlement) + parts.push(`> harness — submission ${turn.settlement}`); + parts.push( + `> harness — completion after turn ${turn.turn}: ${turn.completion.captures} captures; complete ${yesNo(turn.completion.complete)}; ${turn.completion.unsatisfied} unsatisfied; ${turn.completion.unmapped} unmapped`, + ); + if (turn.pendingQuestion !== undefined) { + parts.push("", "**Ask**:", "", turn.pendingQuestion); + } + if (turn.expert) { + parts.push("", "---", ""); + if ( + turn.expert.stimulus && + turn.expert.content === turn.expert.stimulus + ) { + parts.push( + "**Injected experiment stimulus (not expert evidence)**:", + "", + turn.expert.stimulus, + ); + } else { + parts.push( + "**Expert (Marta)**:", + "", + turn.expert.content, + ...(turn.expert.stimulus + ? [ + "", + "**Injected experiment stimulus (not expert evidence)**:", + "", + turn.expert.stimulus, + ] + : []), + ...(turn.expert.truncated + ? ["", "_(expert reply truncated at its token budget)_"] + : []), + ); + } + } + parts.push(""); + return parts.join("\n"); + }); + return `${[...header, "", ...body].join("\n")}`; +} + +// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- +// The run. +// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +const startedAt = new Date().toISOString(); +const situationPack = await readFile(`${caseDir}situation-pack.md`, "utf8"); +const openingRaw = await readFile(`${caseDir}opening-message.md`, "utf8"); +const openingSeparator = openingRaw.indexOf("\n---\n"); +const openingMessage = ( + openingSeparator === -1 ? openingRaw : openingRaw.slice(openingSeparator + 5) +).trim(); + +// The app modules are imported after the environment is set: the elicitor +// reads its model id and the target-document directory at module load. +const [ + { SdcpnElicitor }, + { default: app }, + { SDCPN_AGENT_ROUTE }, + { targetDocumentPath }, +] = await Promise.all([ + import("../../../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/sdcpn-elicitor.ts"), + import("../../../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts"), + import("../../../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/routes.ts"), + import("../../../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/target-document-path.ts"), +]); + +const provider: Provider = interviewerProviderModule + ? ((await import(interviewerProviderModule)).default as Provider) + : ( + await import("@earendil-works/pi-ai/providers/anthropic") + ).anthropicProvider(); + +const interviewerUsage: Usage = { + input: 0, + output: 0, + cacheRead: 0, + cacheWrite: 0, + calls: 0, +}; +const stopObserving = observe((event) => { + if (event.type !== "turn") return; + interviewerUsage.calls += 1; + const usage = event.response.usage; + if (!usage) return; + interviewerUsage.input += usage.input; + interviewerUsage.output += usage.output; + interviewerUsage.cacheRead += usage.cacheRead; + interviewerUsage.cacheWrite += usage.cacheWrite; +}); + +const flue = await start({ agents: [SdcpnElicitor], providers: [provider] }); + +const conversationId = `baseline-condition-5-${startedAt.replaceAll(/[:.]/gu, "-")}`; +const targetDocumentId = conversationId; +const fetchApp: typeof fetch = (input, init) => + Promise.resolve( + app.fetch(input instanceof Request ? input : new Request(input, init)), + ); +const client = createFlueClient({ + url: `http://brunch.local/agents/${SDCPN_AGENT_ROUTE}/${conversationId}`, + fetch: fetchApp, +}); +const store = createLocalCaptureStore(targetDocumentPath(targetDocumentId)); + +const turns: HarnessTurnRecord[] = []; +const expertView: ExpertMessage[] = []; +let stopReason = "hard-stop"; +let turnsWithoutAsk = 0; +let wrapSent = false; +let consumedMessages = 0; + +async function dispatch(body: string, initial = false): Promise { + const admission = await client.send({ + message: { kind: "user", body }, + ...(initial ? { initialData: { targetDocumentId } } : {}), + }); + await client.wait(admission); +} + +async function writeArtifacts(): Promise { + const history = await client.history(); + const storeSnapshot = await store.read(); + const { model, report, record } = readCompletion(storeSnapshot); + const run: HarnessRunRecord = { + startedAt, + condition: CONDITION, + interviewerModel, + expertModel: EXPERT_MODEL, + conversationId, + stopReason, + turns, + usage: { interviewer: interviewerUsage, expert: expertUsage }, + history, + store: storeSnapshot, + }; + const sweepTally = { applied: 0, refused: 0, noRange: 0 }; + for (const sweep of turns.flatMap((turn) => turn.sweeps)) { + if (sweep.status === "applied") sweepTally.applied += 1; + else if (sweep.status === "refused") sweepTally.refused += 1; + else if (sweep.status === "no-settled-range") sweepTally.noRange += 1; + } + await mkdir(transcriptDir, { recursive: true }); + const stem = join(transcriptDir, `condition-${CONDITION}`); + await writeFile(`${stem}.raw.json`, `${JSON.stringify(run, null, 2)}\n`); + await writeFile( + `${stem}.md`, + renderTranscript(run, openingMessage, sweepTally), + ); + await writeFile(`${stem}-model.md`, renderModel(model, report, record)); + await writeFile( + `${stem}-captures.json`, + `${JSON.stringify(storeSnapshot, null, 2)}\n`, + ); + await writeFile( + `${stem}-system.md`, + [ + "# Condition 5 — the interviewer's instructions", + "", + "Reconstructed with the same functions the binding composes them from", + "(`askProtocolInstructionFragments`, `settlementProtocolInstructionFragments`,", + "`renderInstructions(repertoire, sdcpnDefinition)`), so this is the text the", + "elicitor rendered, minus whatever Flue prepends about its own tools.", + "", + "---", + "", + [ + ...askProtocolInstructionFragments(sdcpn.targetFormalism), + ...settlementProtocolInstructionFragments(), + renderInstructions(repertoire, sdcpnDefinition), + ].join("\n\n"), + "", + ].join("\n"), + ); +} + +try { + console.error( + `condition ${CONDITION}: interviewer ${interviewerModel}, expert ${EXPERT_MODEL}`, + ); + let outgoing = openingMessage; + let initial = true; + while (turns.length < HARD_STOP_AT) { + const turnNumber = turns.length + 1; + console.error(`turn ${turnNumber} (interviewer)`); + await dispatch(outgoing, initial); + initial = false; + + const history = await client.history(); + const fresh = history.messages.slice(consumedMessages); + consumedMessages = history.messages.length; + const observed = readTurn(fresh); + const pendingId = pendingAskAffordanceId( + projectFlueHistoryForSweep(history), + ); + const pendingQuestion = + pendingId === undefined + ? undefined + : observed.asks.find( + (ask) => + !ask.rejected && `affordance_${ask.toolCallId}` === pendingId, + )?.question; + const { record: completion } = readCompletion(await store.read()); + const turn: HarnessTurnRecord = { + turn: turnNumber, + ...observed, + ...(pendingQuestion === undefined ? {} : { pendingQuestion }), + completion, + }; + turns.push(turn); + console.error( + ` harness: ${completion.captures} captures, complete ${yesNo(completion.complete)}, ${completion.unsatisfied} unsatisfied; sweeps ${observed.sweeps.map((sweep) => sweep.status).join(",") || "none"}; ask ${pendingQuestion === undefined ? "none" : "pending"}`, + ); + + if (observed.settlement) { + stopReason = `submission-${observed.settlement}`; + break; + } + if (pendingQuestion === undefined) { + turnsWithoutAsk += 1; + if (completion.complete) { + stopReason = "closed-complete"; + break; + } + if (wrapSent) { + stopReason = "closed-incomplete"; + break; + } + if (turnsWithoutAsk >= STALL_AFTER_TURNS_WITHOUT_ASK) { + stopReason = "stalled"; + break; + } + } else { + turnsWithoutAsk = 0; + } + if (turns.length >= HARD_STOP_AT) break; + + // What the expert sees: the interviewer's visible text and its question. + const visible = [ + ...observed.text, + ...(pendingQuestion === undefined ? [] : [pendingQuestion]), + ] + .join("\n\n") + .trim(); + expertView.push({ + role: "user", + content: + visible.length > 0 + ? visible + : "[The interviewer said nothing this turn.]", + }); + + if (turnNumber >= FORCE_WRAP_AT) { + wrapSent = true; + outgoing = FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE; + expertView.push({ role: "assistant", content: FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE }); + turns[turns.length - 1] = { + ...turn, + expert: { content: FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE, stimulus: FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE }, + }; + continue; + } + + console.error(`turn ${turnNumber} (expert)`); + const reply = await callExpert(situationPack, expertView); + const stimulus = turnNumber === IMPATIENCE_AT ? IMPATIENCE_LINE : undefined; + outgoing = stimulus ? `${reply.text}\n\n${stimulus}` : reply.text; + expertView.push({ role: "assistant", content: outgoing }); + turns[turns.length - 1] = { + ...turn, + expert: { + content: reply.text, + ...(stimulus ? { stimulus } : {}), + ...(reply.truncated ? { truncated: true } : {}), + }, + }; + } + await writeArtifacts(); + const last = turns.at(-1)?.completion; + console.error( + `done: ${stopReason} after ${turns.length} interviewer turns; ${last?.captures ?? 0} captures, complete ${yesNo(last?.complete === true)}; interviewer ${formatUsage(interviewerUsage)}; expert ${formatUsage(expertUsage)}`, + ); +} catch (error) { + stopReason = `runner-error: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`; + console.error(error); + await writeArtifacts().catch((writeError: unknown) => + console.error(writeError), + ); + process.exitCode = 1; +} finally { + stopObserving(); + await flue.stop(); + await rm(targetDocumentDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/protocol.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/protocol.md index f2d58f45018..d0a87e061b2 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/protocol.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/protocol.md @@ -4,22 +4,31 @@ What does one-shot / guided AI elicitation already achieve, and what changes whe completion diagnostics drive the guidance? The read-out lives in the immutable [evaluation evidence](../../../../docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/readout.md). +**Status (2026-08-25).** Conditions 1 and 2 are frozen reference evidence: they are rerun only if +the instrument itself changes (expert pack, probes, turn budget), never per design cycle. Condition +3 is retired, never run; its preregistration and prompt stay as the record of what was planned (see +the amendments atop [condition-3-preregistration.md](condition-3-preregistration.md)); its +instrument code, lock, and operator documents were deleted on 2026-08-26. Conditions 4 +and 5 are the live arms of the ADR-0007 convergence cycles: 4 measures the teaching layer as text, +5 measures the shipped harness around that text. Each design cycle reruns both. + ## Conditions | # | Interviewer | System prompt | Approximates | | --- | --------------- | ---------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | 1 | `claude-opus-5` | none | the incumbent: a strong model told to interview-then-build (the Petrinaut assistant's prompt already mandates interview-first, per the FE-1358 survey) | | 2 | `claude-opus-5` | [v0-prompt.md](v0-prompt.md) | the degenerate plugin: the seven-category elicitation surface as pure guidance, no machinery | -| 3 | `claude-opus-5` | [condition-3-prompt.md](condition-3-prompt.md) | the reviewed completion-and-guidance treatment plus a labelled test-only operator projection; still no production harness or plugin runtime | +| 3 | _retired_ | [condition-3-prompt.md](condition-3-prompt.md) | **retired 2026-08-25, never run**: the FE-1402/FE-1403 completion-and-guidance treatment with a test-only operator projection. Superseded by ADR-0007, whose completion machinery is the shipped harness that condition 5 exercises; the hand-run operator would have measured a projection of it | +| 4 | `claude-opus-5` | [condition-4-prompt.md](condition-4-prompt.md) + the harness's rendering of `repertoire.yaml` and `plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml` | the ADR-0007 teaching layer as prompt only (fixed keys, repertoire default, plugin cells, `construct` runbook); no captures, fold, or completion machinery. Its 2→4 delta measures what the keys and repertoire buy over the seven-category prompt | +| 5 | `claude-opus-5` | the shipped SDCPN elicitor's own instructions (binding-flue composes the ask protocol, the settlement protocol, and the same rendering as condition 4) | the harness in the loop: the real `brunch-sdcpn-elicitor` agent in the Flue runtime with `ask`, the settlement nudge, private `sweep` extraction into the capture store, fold, and computed completion. The 4→5 delta measures what the machinery buys over the text; the store is the deliverable | -Conditions 1 and 2 receive the identical opening user message +Conditions 1, 2, 4, and 5 receive the identical opening user message ([opening-message.md](../../../cases/process-model-elicitation/baseline/opening-message.md)); the v0 system prompt is the only difference between conditions 1 and 2, so the 1→2 delta measures what -pack content alone buys. Condition 3 uses the same base opening plus its preregistered -single-session treatment sentence, and adds the other preregistered corrections -and instrument recorded in -[condition-3-preregistration.md](condition-3-preregistration.md); its delta measures the complete -experimental treatment, including operator intervention, rather than a model-only effect. +pack content alone buys. Condition 3 would have used the same base opening plus its preregistered +single-session treatment sentence and the corrections and instrument recorded in +[condition-3-preregistration.md](condition-3-preregistration.md); it was retired before its first +model call. ## Subject and interviewee @@ -35,48 +44,68 @@ are tiered: freely given, _(tacit)_ (surfaces only under reaching questions), _( (honest perspective error), _(doesn't know)_ (genuine absences the interviewer should record rather than fill). -## Mechanics ([run.ts](run.ts)) +## Mechanics ([run.ts](run.ts) for conditions 1, 2, and 4; [harness-run.ts](harness-run.ts) for 5) - Alternating API calls; each side sees only its own history. The interviewer never sees the situation pack; the expert never sees the v0 prompt. -- In condition 3, a separate operator sees only transcript-visible evidence and the frozen FE-1402 - DemandTable. After every expert answer it emits a complete judgment trace, while the interviewer - receives only the selected clause/coordinate/status/grade/demand/failure diagnostic. Operator - diagnostics are removed from the expert's history. +- In condition 3 (retired), a separate operator would have seen only transcript-visible evidence + and the frozen FE-1402 DemandTable, emitting a judgment trace after every expert answer while the + interviewer received only the selected diagnostic; that code was deleted on 2026-08-26 and + survives only in git history. - A `claude-haiku-4-5` classifier checks each interviewer turn for the final model deliverable; - delivery ends the run. + delivery ends the run. Condition 5 has no classifier: the deliverable is the capture store, + folded, and the interviewer ends its own turn-taking by replying without a question. The + condition-4 read-out records a classifier false negative on a gap-declaring delivery; that + instrument weakness is one reason condition 5 reads the harness's facts instead of judging text. +- **Condition 5 loop**: the runner starts the Flue runtime in-process with the shipped + `SdcpnElicitor` (its model overridden to `claude-opus-5` through `BRUNCH_SDCPN_MODEL`) and drives + it through the SDK client over the app's own router. After each interviewer turn it reads durable + history — visible text, `brunch_ask` questions, `brunch_sweep` results, harness signals, submission + settlements — and folds the capture store into the elicited model with the harness's own + `foldElicitedModel`/`evaluateCompletion`. The expert sees the interviewer's visible text and its + pending question; its reply is dispatched as the next user message, which the binding binds to the + pending ask. When the interviewer ends a turn without a question the expert replies to the + statement as a plain dispatch. Interviewer tokens come from Flue's `observe()` turn events, never + hand-counted. Nothing is interpolated into the interviewer's instructions. +- **Condition 5 stop rules**: `closed-complete` (no question pending and the harness reports the + model complete); `closed-incomplete` (no question pending after the forced wrap); `stalled` (three + consecutive interviewer turns without a question before the wrap); `submission-failed`/`-aborted` + (the runtime settled short of a reply); `hard-stop` (24). The forced wrap is dispatched in place of + an expert reply from turn 20 onward. - **Impatience probe**: on exchange 8 the runner appends a scripted time-pressure line to the expert's reply, identically in both conditions (LLMREI found LLM interviewers end too readily on impatience cues; ReqElicitGym found the opposite failure of exhausting the budget — the - probe plus the budget makes both observable). Conditions 1 and 2 retain that inherited placement; - condition 3 triggers it on the first expert reply after the static floor passes and one objective - row is active. -- Condition 3 raises a test-only `NP` advisory after three consecutive non-material expert frames - and ends questioning after five, then permits exactly one interviewer response to deliver the best - supportable result and explicit gaps. Only a new/replacement demanded evidence quote from the new - expert turn resets the streak; regrading, row drift, quote order/duplication, and array length do - not. It keeps completion unchanged and logs the intervention. + probe plus the budget makes both observable). Conditions 1, 2, and 4 use that inherited + placement; condition 3 would have triggered it on the first expert reply after its static floor + passed with one objective row active, and would have added a no-progress advisory and hard stop + (see its preregistration). - **Turn budget**: forced wrap-up at 20 interviewer turns ("produce the model now"), hard stop - at 24. Delivering only at the forced wrap is itself a stopping-discipline finding. + at 24. Delivering only at the forced wrap is itself a stopping-discipline finding. Condition 5 + keeps the same numbers and the same impatience line at turn 8. - The interviewer keeps the model's default adaptive thinking (part of "vanilla Claude"); the expert and classifier run with thinking disabled. When a final delivery is cut off at the - response budget, the legacy runner stitches continuation responses into one message - (`--continue-final` repairs an already-finished run the same way). Condition 3 instead preserves - each truncation seam and writes seal-bound resume/continuation output to a new numbered segment, - leaving its source raw checkpoint and marker unchanged. A checkpoint is written after every - exchange. + response budget, the runner stitches continuation responses into one message + (`--continue-final` repairs an already-finished run the same way). A checkpoint is written after + every exchange. - Sampling is default-temperature; runs are single-shot (n=1 per condition), so treat every read-out claim as existence evidence, not a rate estimate. Rerun from the HASH root with `turbo run baseline:run --filter '@hashintel/brunch-agent' -- 1` / `turbo run baseline:run --filter '@hashintel/brunch-agent' -- 2` / -`turbo run baseline:run --filter '@hashintel/brunch-agent' -- 3` (needs `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`). -Production transcripts land in +`turbo run baseline:run --filter '@hashintel/brunch-agent' -- 4` (needs `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`; +condition 4 imports the harness's built output, so `turbo run build --filter '@hashintel/brunch-agent'` +first, and writes the assembled system prompt beside its transcript as `condition-4-system.md`). +Condition 4 otherwise uses conditions 1–2's mechanics: the legacy impatience placement, turn +budget, and delivery classifier. Condition 5 runs from the application package, which owns the +agent composition: `turbo run baseline:harness --filter '@apps/brunch-agent'` (builds the workspace +first; writes `condition-5.md`, `condition-5.raw.json`, `condition-5-model.md`, +`condition-5-captures.json`, and `condition-5-system.md`). `run.ts` accepts only `1`, `2`, and `4`; +condition 3 has no entry point. Production transcripts land in `docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/`. Tests set - `BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR` to an isolated directory and never write committed evidence. - Condition 3 additionally writes an operator trace and refuses a production run whose frozen - preregistration lock does not match the treatment files. + `BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR` to an isolated directory and never write committed evidence; + the condition-5 test additionally swaps both models for stand-ins + (`BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE`, `BRUNCH_BASELINE_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE`). ## Instruments (scored in the read-out) @@ -94,9 +123,15 @@ Production transcripts land in (Dora's explicit-list requirement). 4. **Structural sanity of the output net**, judged against the Petrinaut format facts from the FE-1358 survey (scenario-or-dead-net, PascalCase identifiers, no timing fields, arc shape). -5. **Stopping discipline**: reaction to the impatience probe; self-stop vs. forced wrap. +5. **Stopping discipline**: reaction to the impatience probe; self-stop vs. forced wrap. In + condition 5 also: whether the interviewer's self-stop coincides with the harness's computed + completion, and how it uses the completion cue and the settlement nudge. 6. **Excavation checks**: did the interviewer surface the _(tacit)_ facts, correct the _(believes)_ errors, and record the _(doesn't know)_ absences as absences? +7. **Turn cost (condition 5 only)**: tokens per turn by purpose (interview, sweep, repair) and, + once the runner records Flue's `turn` event `durationMs`, wall-clock per purpose and time to + the visible question. The first run recorded tokens and the run window only; see the + [turn latency assessment](../../../../docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md). ## Threats to validity (acknowledged) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/run.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/run.ts index 01a7d5dd7b4..1bc5b37a39f 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/run.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/run.ts @@ -1,62 +1,42 @@ -// Baseline interview runner (FE-1361 and FE-1404). +// Baseline interview runner (FE-1361) for the prompt-only conditions. // -// Conditions 1 and 2 preserve the reviewed FE-1361 controls: bare Claude and -// the v0 elicitation prompt. Condition 3 adds the frozen FE-1404 completion and -// guidance instrument plus a test-only, transcript-bounded operator projection. +// Conditions 1 and 2 preserve the reviewed FE-1361 controls: bare Claude and the v0 elicitation +// prompt. Condition 4 is the ADR-0007 teaching layer as prompt only. Condition 5 — the shipped +// harness in the loop — runs from `harness-run.ts`. Condition 3 (the FE-1404 preregistered +// completion-and-guidance instrument with a test-only operator projection) was retired without a +// run and its code removed on 2026-08-26; `condition-3-preregistration.md` and +// `condition-3-prompt.md` remain as the record of what was planned. // -// Usage: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... node --experimental-strip-types run.ts <1|2|3> [--resume|--continue-final|--verify-seal] +// Usage: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... node --experimental-strip-types run.ts <1|2|4> [--resume|--continue-final] +// Condition 4's interviewer system prompt is condition-4-prompt.md plus the harness's rendering of +// the repertoire and the SDCPN plugin definition (contract, guidance, construct runbook), with no +// harness machinery behind it. It reads the rendering from `@hashintel/brunch-agent`'s built +// output, so run `turbo build` first. // --resume continue an interrupted run from its checkpoint -// --continue-final ask the interviewer to finish a final delivery that was cut off at -// max_tokens; C1/C2 merge legacy output, while C3 appends a sealed segment -// --verify-seal validate condition 3's exact manifest and chronology without a model call +// --continue-final ask the interviewer to finish a final delivery that was cut off at max_tokens // // Production outputs, under docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/transcripts/: // condition-.md readable transcript with run metadata // condition-.raw.json full message arrays + per-call token usage (also the checkpoint) // condition--model.txt the final delivery message, verbatim (delivered runs only) -// Condition-3 recovery uses numbered `.segment-NNN-{resume,continuation}` stems and never -// overwrites its source raw trace. -import { createHash } from "node:crypto"; import { existsSync } from "node:fs"; -import { mkdir, readFile, readdir, stat, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises"; +import { mkdir, readFile, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises"; import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; -import { - assertCompleteCondition3Projection, - assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics, - assertCondition3UnsupportedAnchorContinuity, - CONDITION_3_ACTIVATION_MATRIX, - CONDITION_3_DEMAND_CLAUSES, - CONDITION_3_DEMAND_TABLE_VERSION, - CONDITION_3_DIAGNOSTIC_PRIORITY, - CONDITION_3_GEN_Q02_LAYER_2, - CONDITION_3_INSTRUMENT_VERSION, - CONDITION_3_LOCKED_PATHS, - CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE, - CONDITION_3_STOPPING_RULES, - nextCondition3NoProgressStreak, - parseCondition3Projection, - type Condition3CardId, - type Condition3ClauseId, - type Condition3FiresWhen, - type Condition3Projection, -} from "./condition-3-instrument.ts"; - import type Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"; const INTERVIEWER_MODEL = "claude-opus-5"; const EXPERT_MODEL = "claude-sonnet-5"; const CLASSIFIER_MODEL = "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001"; -const OPERATOR_MODEL = "claude-opus-5"; // Interviewer turns, not exchanges. ReqElicitGym budgets 20; we force a wrap-up at 20 and // hard-stop at 24 in case the model keeps talking instead of delivering. -const LEGACY_FORCE_WRAP_AT = 20; -const LEGACY_HARD_STOP_AT = 24; +const FORCE_WRAP_AT = 20; +const HARD_STOP_AT = 24; // The scripted impatience probe (LLMREI: interviewers end too readily on impatience cues). -// Appended to the expert's reply on this exchange, identically in both conditions. -const LEGACY_IMPATIENCE_AT = 8; +// Appended to the expert's reply on this exchange, identically in every condition. +const IMPATIENCE_AT = 8; const IMPATIENCE_LINE = "(Sorry — I've just seen the time, I have the floor huddle in ten minutes. How much more do you need?)"; const FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE = @@ -69,18 +49,6 @@ type ChatMessage = Omit & { // Present only when the API ended this model-generated message at its token limit. // Older checkpoints and human-authored messages legitimately omit it. truncated?: true; - // Condition 3 appends an operator diagnostic to the interviewer-facing user - // message. The expert's next call must see only its own original answer. - expertContent?: string; - operatorDiagnostic?: string; - experimentStimulus?: string; - // Condition 3 recovery is append-only. The source message and its truncation - // marker remain intact; later pieces are separate durable seam records. - continuations?: Array<{ - content: string; - truncated: boolean; - recordedAt: string; - }>; }; type Usage = Pick & @@ -92,7 +60,7 @@ type Usage = Pick & >; interface CallRecord { - agent: "interviewer" | "expert" | "classifier" | "operator"; + agent: "interviewer" | "expert" | "classifier"; model: Anthropic.Model; usage: Usage; } @@ -100,122 +68,38 @@ interface CallRecord { interface CallResult { text: string; truncated: boolean; - sourceText?: string; - continuations?: ChatMessage["continuations"]; -} - -interface Condition3ActivationMatch { - cardId: Exclude; - clauseId: Condition3ClauseId; - predicate: Condition3FiresWhen; -} - -interface Condition3ProjectionRecord extends Condition3Projection { - turn: number; - recordedAt: string; - selectedClauseId: Condition3ClauseId | null; - selectedUnsupportedAnchorLabel: string | null; - selectedCardId: Condition3CardId | null; - selectedPredicate: Condition3FiresWhen | null; - activationMatches: Condition3ActivationMatch[]; - noProgressStreak: number; - noProgressAdvisory: boolean; -} - -interface Condition3Preregistration { - path: string; - sha256: string; - sealedAt: string; - modifiedAt: string; - verifiedBeforeRun: boolean; -} - -interface Condition3OperatorAttempt { - turn: number; - attempt: number; - recordedAt: string; - rawText: string; - parseError: string | null; } interface RawCheckpoint { startedAt: string; - condition: "1" | "2" | "3"; + condition: "1" | "2" | "4"; stopReason: string; calls: CallRecord[]; interviewerMessages: ChatMessage[]; - instrumentVersion?: string; - demandTableVersion?: string; - modelConfiguration?: { - interviewer: string; - expert: string; - classifier: string; - operator: string; - sampling: string; - seed: null; - seedSupport: false; - }; - preregistration?: Condition3Preregistration; - operatorProjections?: Condition3ProjectionRecord[]; - operatorAttempts?: Condition3OperatorAttempt[]; - impatienceProbeTurn?: number; - genQ02Layer2?: typeof CONDITION_3_GEN_Q02_LAYER_2; - recovery?: { - mode: "resume" | "continue-final"; - sourceRawPath: string; - sourceSha256: string; - seams: Array<{ - kind: - | "truncated-expert-regeneration" - | "truncated-interviewer-regeneration" - | "final-continuation"; - sourceHadTruncationMarker: true; - sourceContent: string; - recordedAt: string; - }>; - }; } -const CONDITION_3_MODEL_CONFIGURATION = { - interviewer: INTERVIEWER_MODEL, - expert: EXPERT_MODEL, - classifier: CLASSIFIER_MODEL, - operator: OPERATOR_MODEL, - sampling: CONDITION_3_STOPPING_RULES.providerSampling, - seed: null, - seedSupport: false, -} as const; - function usage(): never { - console.error( - "usage: node run.ts <1|2|3> [--resume|--continue-final|--verify-seal]", - ); + console.error("usage: node run.ts <1|2|4> [--resume|--continue-final]"); process.exit(1); } const conditionArg = process.argv[2]; const mode = process.argv[3] ?? "fresh"; -if (conditionArg !== "1" && conditionArg !== "2" && conditionArg !== "3") +if (conditionArg !== "1" && conditionArg !== "2" && conditionArg !== "4") usage(); -if ( - mode !== "fresh" && - mode !== "--resume" && - mode !== "--continue-final" && - mode !== "--verify-seal" -) +if (mode !== "fresh" && mode !== "--resume" && mode !== "--continue-final") usage(); -if (mode === "--verify-seal" && conditionArg !== "3") usage(); const condition = conditionArg; const clientModule = process.env["BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE"]; const testOutputDirectory = process.env["BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR"]; const apiKey = process.env["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"]; -if (mode !== "--verify-seal" && testOutputDirectory && !clientModule) { +if (testOutputDirectory && !clientModule) { console.error( "BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR requires BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE", ); process.exit(1); } -if (mode !== "--verify-seal" && !apiKey && !clientModule) { +if (!apiKey && !clientModule) { console.error("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is not set"); process.exit(1); } @@ -258,21 +142,6 @@ const transcriptDir = ), ); const calls: CallRecord[] = []; -const operatorProjections: Condition3ProjectionRecord[] = []; -const operatorAttempts: Condition3OperatorAttempt[] = []; - -function completeMessageContent(message: ChatMessage): string { - return ( - message.content + - (message.continuations ?? []) - .map((continuation) => continuation.content) - .join("") - ); -} - -function sha256(content: string): string { - return createHash("sha256").update(content).digest("hex"); -} async function callClaude( agent: CallRecord["agent"], @@ -298,11 +167,10 @@ async function callClaude( ? {} : { thinking: { type: "disabled" as const } }), ...(system ? { system } : {}), - // Project persistence metadata out of the provider request while retaining - // every append-only continuation piece in the message's semantic content. + // Project persistence metadata out of the provider request. messages: messages.map((message) => ({ role: message.role, - content: completeMessageContent(message), + content: message.content, })), }); calls.push({ @@ -352,8 +220,6 @@ async function callInterviewer( allowThinking: true, }, ); - const sourceText = result.text; - const continuations: NonNullable = []; let text = result.text; for (let piece = 1; result.truncated && piece <= 4; piece++) { console.error(` interviewer: truncated, requesting continuation ${piece}`); @@ -369,24 +235,12 @@ async function callInterviewer( 16_000, { allowThinking: true }, ); - continuations.push({ - content: result.text, - truncated: result.truncated, - recordedAt: new Date().toISOString(), - }); // No separator at the seam: the cut usually lands mid-line or mid-token // and the model is instructed to continue exactly from where it stopped, // so an injected newline would corrupt the merged document. text += result.text; } - return condition === "3" && continuations.length > 0 - ? { - text, - truncated: result.truncated, - sourceText, - continuations, - } - : { text, truncated: result.truncated }; + return { text, truncated: result.truncated }; } async function loadSection(file: string): Promise { @@ -400,546 +254,6 @@ async function loadSection(file: string): Promise { : raw.slice(separatorIndex + 5).trim(); } -async function loadCondition3Preregistration( - runStartedAt: string, -): Promise { - const path = `${baseDir}condition-3-preregistration.lock.json`; - const contextRoot = fileURLToPath(new URL("../../../../", import.meta.url)); - const [content, metadata] = await Promise.all([ - readFile(path, "utf8"), - stat(path), - ]); - const lock = JSON.parse(content) as { - version?: unknown; - sealedAt?: unknown; - files?: unknown; - }; - if ( - lock.version !== CONDITION_3_INSTRUMENT_VERSION || - typeof lock.sealedAt !== "string" || - !Number.isFinite(Date.parse(lock.sealedAt)) || - !Array.isArray(lock.files) || - lock.files.length === 0 - ) { - throw new Error("condition-3 preregistration lock has an invalid envelope"); - } - const rows: Array<{ path: string; sha256: string }> = []; - for (const item of lock.files) { - if ( - typeof item !== "object" || - item === null || - !("path" in item) || - typeof item.path !== "string" || - !("sha256" in item) || - typeof item.sha256 !== "string" - ) { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 preregistration lock has an invalid file row", - ); - } - rows.push({ path: item.path, sha256: item.sha256 }); - } - const actualPaths = rows.map(({ path: lockedPath }) => lockedPath); - const duplicatePaths = actualPaths.filter( - (lockedPath, index) => actualPaths.indexOf(lockedPath) !== index, - ); - const missingPaths = CONDITION_3_LOCKED_PATHS.filter( - (lockedPath) => !actualPaths.includes(lockedPath), - ); - const extraPaths = actualPaths.filter( - (lockedPath) => - !CONDITION_3_LOCKED_PATHS.includes( - lockedPath as (typeof CONDITION_3_LOCKED_PATHS)[number], - ), - ); - const pathsAreInCanonicalOrder = actualPaths.every( - (lockedPath, index) => lockedPath === CONDITION_3_LOCKED_PATHS[index], - ); - if ( - actualPaths.length !== CONDITION_3_LOCKED_PATHS.length || - duplicatePaths.length > 0 || - missingPaths.length > 0 || - extraPaths.length > 0 || - !pathsAreInCanonicalOrder - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 preregistration manifest is not canonical: missing=${missingPaths.join(",") || "none"}; extra=${extraPaths.join(",") || "none"}; duplicate=${duplicatePaths.join(",") || "none"}; order=${pathsAreInCanonicalOrder ? "canonical" : "noncanonical"}`, - ); - } - let newestLockedMtimeMs = Number.NEGATIVE_INFINITY; - for (const item of rows) { - const lockedFilePath = contextRoot + item.path; - const [lockedContent, lockedMetadata] = await Promise.all([ - readFile(lockedFilePath, "utf8"), - stat(lockedFilePath), - ]); - const actualHash = sha256(lockedContent); - if (actualHash !== item.sha256) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 preregistration mismatch for ${item.path}: expected ${item.sha256}, got ${actualHash}`, - ); - } - newestLockedMtimeMs = Math.max(newestLockedMtimeMs, lockedMetadata.mtimeMs); - } - const sealedAtMs = Date.parse(lock.sealedAt); - if ( - sealedAtMs <= newestLockedMtimeMs || - metadata.mtimeMs <= newestLockedMtimeMs || - metadata.mtimeMs < sealedAtMs - ) { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 preregistration chronology is invalid: sealedAt and finalized lock mtime must postdate every locked file, and lock mtime must not predate sealedAt", - ); - } - const modifiedAt = metadata.mtime.toISOString(); - const verifiedBeforeRun = - metadata.mtimeMs <= Date.parse(runStartedAt) && - sealedAtMs <= Date.parse(runStartedAt); - if (!verifiedBeforeRun) { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 preregistration lock does not predate the run", - ); - } - return { - path, - sha256: sha256(content), - sealedAt: lock.sealedAt, - modifiedAt, - verifiedBeforeRun, - }; -} - -function assertCondition3CheckpointBinding( - checkpoint: RawCheckpoint, - currentPreregistration: Condition3Preregistration, -): void { - const expectedConfigurationEntries = Object.entries( - CONDITION_3_MODEL_CONFIGURATION, - ); - const modelConfigurationMatches = - checkpoint.modelConfiguration !== undefined && - Object.keys(checkpoint.modelConfiguration).length === - expectedConfigurationEntries.length && - expectedConfigurationEntries.every( - ([key, value]) => - checkpoint.modelConfiguration?.[ - key as keyof typeof checkpoint.modelConfiguration - ] === value, - ); - if ( - checkpoint.condition !== "3" || - checkpoint.instrumentVersion !== CONDITION_3_INSTRUMENT_VERSION || - checkpoint.demandTableVersion !== CONDITION_3_DEMAND_TABLE_VERSION || - checkpoint.preregistration?.sha256 !== currentPreregistration.sha256 || - !modelConfigurationMatches - ) { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 checkpoint binding mismatch: seal, instrument, DemandTable, and model configuration must match exactly before recovery", - ); - } -} - -async function resolveArtifactPaths(): Promise<{ - artifactStem: string; - rawPath: string; - sourceRawPath?: string; -}> { - const baseStem = `condition-${condition}`; - const baseRawPath = `${transcriptDir}/${baseStem}.raw.json`; - if (condition !== "3" || mode === "fresh") { - return { artifactStem: baseStem, rawPath: baseRawPath }; - } - const entries = await readdir(transcriptDir); - const candidates = entries.flatMap((name) => { - if (name === "condition-3.raw.json") { - return [{ sequence: 0, path: `${transcriptDir}/${name}` }]; - } - const match = - /^condition-3\.segment-(\d{3})-(?:resume|continuation)\.raw\.json$/u.exec( - name, - ); - return match - ? [ - { - sequence: Number.parseInt(match[1] ?? "0", 10), - path: `${transcriptDir}/${name}`, - }, - ] - : []; - }); - const latest = candidates.sort( - (left, right) => right.sequence - left.sequence, - )[0]; - if (!latest) { - throw new Error("condition-3 recovery has no source raw checkpoint"); - } - const nextSequence = String(latest.sequence + 1).padStart(3, "0"); - const recoveryLabel = mode === "--continue-final" ? "continuation" : "resume"; - const artifactStem = `condition-3.segment-${nextSequence}-${recoveryLabel}`; - return { - artifactStem, - rawPath: `${transcriptDir}/${artifactStem}.raw.json`, - sourceRawPath: latest.path, - }; -} - -function parseOperatorJson(text: string): Condition3Projection { - const withoutFence = text - .trim() - .replace(/^```(?:json)?\s*/u, "") - .replace(/\s*```$/u, ""); - const projection = parseCondition3Projection( - JSON.parse(withoutFence) as unknown, - ); - assertCompleteCondition3Projection(projection); - assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(projection); - - const clausesById = new Map( - CONDITION_3_DEMAND_CLAUSES.map((clause) => [clause.id, clause]), - ); - for (const assessment of projection.assessments) { - const clause = clausesById.get(assessment.clauseId as Condition3ClauseId); - if (!clause) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 operator returned unknown clause ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - if ( - assessment.coordinate !== clause.coordinate || - assessment.demand !== clause.demand - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 operator changed frozen metadata for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - const demanded = - clause.row === null || - projection.activeObjectiveRows.includes(clause.row); - if (assessment.demanded !== demanded) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 operator demand applicability disagrees with the active rows for ${assessment.clauseId}`, - ); - } - if ( - !demanded && - (!assessment.pass || - assessment.currentStatus !== "not-applicable" || - assessment.currentGrade !== "not-applicable" || - assessment.failureDiagnostic !== null || - assessment.activationPredicates.length !== 0) - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 operator did not mark inactive clause ${assessment.clauseId} inapplicable`, - ); - } - } - return projection; -} - -function validateProjectionEvidence( - projection: Condition3Projection, - messages: ChatMessage[], -): void { - const visibleTextByTurn = new Map(); - messages.forEach((message, index) => { - if (message.role !== "user") return; - const turn = Math.ceil(index / 2); - const visibleText = message.expertContent ?? message.content; - const texts = visibleTextByTurn.get(turn) ?? []; - texts.push(visibleText); - visibleTextByTurn.set(turn, texts); - }); - for (const rowEvidence of projection.activeObjectiveRowEvidence) { - for (const evidence of rowEvidence.evidence) { - const suppliedAtTurn = visibleTextByTurn.get(evidence.turn) ?? []; - if (!suppliedAtTurn.some((text) => text.includes(evidence.quote))) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 activation evidence quote for ${rowEvidence.row} does not occur in supplied transcript turn ${evidence.turn}`, - ); - } - } - } - for (const anchor of projection.retractedObjectiveAnchors) { - for (const evidence of [...anchor.evidence, ...anchor.resolutionEvidence]) { - const suppliedAtTurn = visibleTextByTurn.get(evidence.turn) ?? []; - if (!suppliedAtTurn.some((text) => text.includes(evidence.quote))) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 evidence quote for retracted objective anchor '${anchor.anchorLabel}' does not occur in supplied transcript turn ${evidence.turn}`, - ); - } - } - } - for (const assessment of projection.assessments) { - for (const evidence of assessment.evidence) { - const suppliedAtTurn = visibleTextByTurn.get(evidence.turn) ?? []; - if (!suppliedAtTurn.some((text) => text.includes(evidence.quote))) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 evidence quote for ${assessment.clauseId} does not occur in supplied transcript turn ${evidence.turn}`, - ); - } - } - } - for (const anchor of projection.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors) { - const allAnchorEvidence = [ - ...anchor.evidence, - ...(anchor.state === "retracted" ? anchor.resolutionEvidence : []), - ]; - for (const evidence of allAnchorEvidence) { - const suppliedAtTurn = visibleTextByTurn.get(evidence.turn) ?? []; - if (!suppliedAtTurn.some((text) => text.includes(evidence.quote))) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 evidence quote for unsupported active objective anchor '${anchor.label}' does not occur in supplied transcript turn ${evidence.turn}`, - ); - } - } - } -} - -function operatorTranscript(messages: ChatMessage[]): string { - return messages - .map((message, index) => { - const speaker = - message.role === "assistant" - ? "INTERVIEWER" - : message.experimentStimulus && !message.expertContent - ? "EXPERIMENT_STIMULUS" - : index === 0 - ? "OPENING" - : "EXPERT"; - const visibleContent = message.expertContent - ? `${message.expertContent}${message.experimentStimulus ? `\n\n${message.experimentStimulus}` : ""}` - : completeMessageContent(message); - return `[${speaker} turn=${Math.ceil(index / 2)}]\n${visibleContent}`; - }) - .join("\n\n"); -} - -async function callCondition3Operator( - operatorSystem: string, - messages: ChatMessage[], - turn: number, -): Promise { - let priorError = ""; - let lastValidationError = "not recorded"; - for (let attempt = 1; attempt <= 3; attempt++) { - const result = await callClaude( - "operator", - OPERATOR_MODEL, - operatorSystem, - [ - { - role: "user", - content: - "Return the complete projection JSON for this transcript.\n\n" + - operatorTranscript(messages) + - priorError, - }, - ], - 12_000, - ); - try { - const projection = parseOperatorJson(result.text); - validateProjectionEvidence(projection, messages); - assertCondition3UnsupportedAnchorContinuity( - operatorProjections.at(-1), - projection, - turn, - ); - operatorAttempts.push({ - turn, - attempt, - recordedAt: new Date().toISOString(), - rawText: result.text, - parseError: null, - }); - return projection; - } catch (error) { - const parseError = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error); - lastValidationError = parseError; - operatorAttempts.push({ - turn, - attempt, - recordedAt: new Date().toISOString(), - rawText: result.text, - parseError, - }); - console.error( - `condition-3 operator projection rejected at turn ${turn}, attempt ${attempt}: ${parseError}`, - ); - priorError = `\n\nYour previous response failed validation: ${parseError}. Return a corrected complete JSON projection.`; - } - } - throw new Error( - `condition-3 operator exhausted projection-validation attempts; last error: ${lastValidationError}`, - ); -} - -function activationMatches( - projection: Condition3Projection, -): Condition3ActivationMatch[] { - const matches: Condition3ActivationMatch[] = []; - for (const assessment of projection.assessments) { - for (const binding of CONDITION_3_ACTIVATION_MATRIX) { - if (!binding.clauses.includes(assessment.clauseId as never)) continue; - for (const predicate of assessment.activationPredicates) { - if (binding.predicates.includes(predicate as never)) { - matches.push({ - cardId: binding.cardId, - clauseId: assessment.clauseId as Condition3ClauseId, - predicate, - }); - } - } - } - } - - return matches; -} - -function selectedAssessment(projection: Condition3Projection) { - for (const clauseId of CONDITION_3_DIAGNOSTIC_PRIORITY) { - const assessment = projection.assessments.find( - (candidate) => candidate.clauseId === clauseId && !candidate.pass, - ); - if (assessment) return assessment; - } - return null; -} - -function assertCondition3CheckpointSemantics(checkpoint: RawCheckpoint): void { - if ( - !Array.isArray(checkpoint.interviewerMessages) || - checkpoint.interviewerMessages.some( - (message) => - (message.role !== "user" && message.role !== "assistant") || - typeof message.content !== "string", - ) - ) { - throw new Error("condition-3 checkpoint has malformed interview messages"); - } - if ( - !Array.isArray(checkpoint.operatorProjections) || - !Array.isArray(checkpoint.operatorAttempts) - ) { - throw new Error("condition-3 checkpoint lacks an operator trace"); - } - const validatedHistory: Condition3Projection[] = []; - const selectedUnsupportedLabels = new Set(); - for (const [index, record] of checkpoint.operatorProjections.entries()) { - if ( - record.turn !== index + 1 || - typeof record.recordedAt !== "string" || - !Number.isInteger(record.noProgressStreak) || - typeof record.noProgressAdvisory !== "boolean" - ) { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 checkpoint projection metadata is malformed or non-sequential", - ); - } - const projection = parseCondition3Projection({ - activeObjectiveRows: record.activeObjectiveRows, - activeObjectiveRowEvidence: record.activeObjectiveRowEvidence, - retractedObjectiveAnchors: record.retractedObjectiveAnchors, - unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors: - record.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors, - assessments: record.assessments, - notes: record.notes, - }); - assertCompleteCondition3Projection(projection); - assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(projection); - assertCondition3UnsupportedAnchorContinuity( - validatedHistory.at(-1), - projection, - record.turn, - ); - validateProjectionEvidence( - projection, - checkpoint.interviewerMessages.slice(0, record.turn * 2 + 1), - ); - const expectedStreak = nextCondition3NoProgressStreak( - validatedHistory, - projection, - record.turn, - validatedHistory.length === 0 - ? 0 - : (checkpoint.operatorProjections[index - 1]?.noProgressStreak ?? 0), - ); - const expectedMatches = activationMatches(projection); - const selectedUnsupportedAnchor = - projection.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors.find( - ({ label, state }) => - state === "active" && !selectedUnsupportedLabels.has(label), - ); - const selected = selectedUnsupportedAnchor - ? null - : selectedAssessment(projection); - const selectedMatch = selected - ? expectedMatches.find((match) => match.clauseId === selected.clauseId) - : undefined; - if ( - record.noProgressStreak !== expectedStreak || - record.noProgressAdvisory !== - expectedStreak >= CONDITION_3_STOPPING_RULES.noProgressAdvisoryAfter || - JSON.stringify(record.activationMatches) !== - JSON.stringify(expectedMatches) || - record.selectedUnsupportedAnchorLabel !== - (selectedUnsupportedAnchor?.label ?? null) || - record.selectedClauseId !== (selected?.clauseId ?? null) || - record.selectedCardId !== (selectedMatch?.cardId ?? null) || - record.selectedPredicate !== (selectedMatch?.predicate ?? null) - ) { - throw new Error( - `condition-3 checkpoint projection semantics disagree at turn ${record.turn}`, - ); - } - if (selectedUnsupportedAnchor) { - selectedUnsupportedLabels.add(selectedUnsupportedAnchor.label); - } - validatedHistory.push(projection); - } - if ( - checkpoint.operatorAttempts.some( - (attempt) => - !Number.isInteger(attempt.turn) || - !Number.isInteger(attempt.attempt) || - typeof attempt.recordedAt !== "string" || - typeof attempt.rawText !== "string" || - (attempt.parseError !== null && typeof attempt.parseError !== "string"), - ) - ) { - throw new Error("condition-3 checkpoint operator attempts are malformed"); - } -} - -function renderOperatorDiagnostic( - projection: Condition3ProjectionRecord, -): string { - if (projection.selectedUnsupportedAnchorLabel !== null) { - return [ - "clause=unsupported-active-anchor", - `coordinate=${projection.selectedUnsupportedAnchorLabel}`, - "status=explicit", - "grade=verbal", - "demand=record the active objective as unsupported by the frozen row set; do not invent a binding", - "failure=unsupported-active-anchor", - ].join("; "); - } - const selected = projection.assessments.find( - (assessment) => assessment.clauseId === projection.selectedClauseId, - ); - if (!selected) { - return "clause=none; coordinate=none; status=not-applicable; grade=not-applicable; demand=none; failure=none"; - } - return [ - `clause=${selected.clauseId}`, - `coordinate=${selected.coordinate}`, - `status=${selected.currentStatus}`, - `grade=${selected.currentGrade}`, - `demand=${selected.demand}`, - `failure=${selected.failureDiagnostic ?? "none"}`, - ].join("; "); -} - async function isFinalModel(message: string): Promise { const verdict = await callClaude( "classifier", @@ -962,42 +276,53 @@ async function isFinalModel(message: string): Promise { return verdict.text.trim().toUpperCase().startsWith("YES"); } -const sharedOpeningMessage = await loadSection(`${caseDir}opening-message.md`); -const singleSessionStimulus = - "This is the only session available for this experiment. No external data or later follow-up will arrive. Please produce the best useful result supportable in this session."; -const openingMessage = - condition === "3" - ? `${sharedOpeningMessage}\n\n${singleSessionStimulus}` - : sharedOpeningMessage; +const openingMessage = await loadSection(`${caseDir}opening-message.md`); + +/** + * Condition 4's system prompt: the hand-written framing for a prompt-only run, + * then the harness's own rendering of the repertoire and the SDCPN definition — + * the same text the binding would put in front of the interviewer, minus the + * preamble about machinery this run does not have. + */ +async function renderCondition4System(): Promise { + const harness = (await import("@hashintel/brunch-agent")) as { + readPluginDefinition: (yaml: string) => unknown; + readRepertoire: (yaml: string) => unknown; + renderContract: (definition: unknown) => string[]; + renderGuidance: (repertoire: unknown, definition: unknown) => string[]; + renderRunbook: ( + repertoire: unknown, + definition: unknown, + job: "construct" | "review-and-revise", + ) => string; + }; + const packagesDir = fileURLToPath( + new URL("../../../../packages/", import.meta.url), + ); + const definition = harness.readPluginDefinition( + await readFile(`${packagesDir}plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`, "utf8"), + ); + const repertoire = harness.readRepertoire( + await readFile(`${packagesDir}repertoire/repertoire.yaml`, "utf8"), + ); + const rendered = [ + ...harness.renderContract(definition), + ...harness.renderGuidance(repertoire, definition), + harness.renderRunbook(repertoire, definition, "construct"), + ].join("\n\n"); + return `${await loadSection("condition-4-prompt.md")}\n\n${rendered}`; +} + const interviewerSystem = condition === "2" ? await loadSection("v0-prompt.md") - : condition === "3" - ? await loadSection("condition-3-prompt.md") + : condition === "4" + ? await renderCondition4System() : undefined; -const operatorSystem = - condition === "3" - ? `${await loadSection("condition-3-operator.md")}\n\n\n${JSON.stringify(CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE, null, 2)}\n\n\n\n${JSON.stringify(CONDITION_3_DEMAND_CLAUSES)}\n\n\n\n${JSON.stringify(CONDITION_3_ACTIVATION_MATRIX)}\n` - : undefined; const situationPack = await readFile(`${caseDir}situation-pack.md`, "utf8"); -const forceWrapAt = - condition === "3" - ? CONDITION_3_STOPPING_RULES.forceWrapAt - : LEGACY_FORCE_WRAP_AT; -const hardStopAt = - condition === "3" - ? CONDITION_3_STOPPING_RULES.hardStopAt - : LEGACY_HARD_STOP_AT; let interviewerMessages: ChatMessage[] = [ - condition === "3" - ? { - role: "user", - content: openingMessage, - expertContent: sharedOpeningMessage, - experimentStimulus: singleSessionStimulus, - } - : { role: "user", content: openingMessage }, + { role: "user", content: openingMessage }, ]; let stopReason = "hard-stop"; @@ -1008,35 +333,14 @@ function expertView(): ChatMessage[] { return interviewerMessages.slice(1).map((message) => ({ role: message.role === "assistant" ? ("user" as const) : ("assistant" as const), - content: message.expertContent - ? `${message.expertContent}${message.experimentStimulus ? `\n\n${message.experimentStimulus}` : ""}` - : completeMessageContent(message), + content: message.content, })); } let interviewerTurns = 0; let startedAt = new Date().toISOString(); -let preregistration = - condition === "3" - ? await loadCondition3Preregistration(startedAt) - : undefined; -if (mode === "--verify-seal") { - console.error( - `condition-3 seal verified: ${preregistration?.sha256} (sealed ${preregistration?.sealedAt}; lock mtime ${preregistration?.modifiedAt})`, - ); - process.exit(0); -} await mkdir(transcriptDir, { recursive: true }); -const { artifactStem, rawPath, sourceRawPath } = await resolveArtifactPaths(); -let recovery: RawCheckpoint["recovery"] = sourceRawPath - ? { - mode: mode === "--continue-final" ? "continue-final" : "resume", - sourceRawPath, - sourceSha256: sha256(await readFile(sourceRawPath, "utf8")), - seams: [], - } - : undefined; -let impatienceProbeTurn: number | undefined; -let noProgressClosePending = false; +const artifactStem = `condition-${condition}`; +const rawPath = `${transcriptDir}/${artifactStem}.raw.json`; if (mode === "fresh" && existsSync(rawPath)) { // The checkpoint is also the run's only record; an unguarded fresh run @@ -1050,15 +354,8 @@ if (mode === "fresh" && existsSync(rawPath)) { if (mode !== "fresh") { const checkpoint = JSON.parse( - await readFile(sourceRawPath ?? rawPath, "utf8"), + await readFile(rawPath, "utf8"), ) as RawCheckpoint; - if (condition === "3") { - if (!preregistration) { - throw new Error("condition-3 current preregistration is unavailable"); - } - assertCondition3CheckpointBinding(checkpoint, preregistration); - assertCondition3CheckpointSemantics(checkpoint); - } interviewerMessages = checkpoint.interviewerMessages; calls.push(...checkpoint.calls); interviewerTurns = interviewerMessages.filter( @@ -1066,22 +363,6 @@ if (mode !== "fresh") { ).length; startedAt = checkpoint.startedAt; stopReason = checkpoint.stopReason; - if (condition === "3") { - if ( - !checkpoint.preregistration || - !checkpoint.operatorProjections || - !checkpoint.operatorAttempts - ) { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 checkpoint lacks preregistration or operator trace", - ); - } - operatorProjections.push(...checkpoint.operatorProjections); - operatorAttempts.push(...checkpoint.operatorAttempts); - impatienceProbeTurn = checkpoint.impatienceProbeTurn; - noProgressClosePending = - checkpoint.stopReason === "no-progress-hard-stop-pending-delivery"; - } } function writeCheckpoint(reason: string): Promise { @@ -1091,21 +372,6 @@ function writeCheckpoint(reason: string): Promise { stopReason: reason, calls, interviewerMessages, - ...(condition === "3" - ? { - instrumentVersion: CONDITION_3_INSTRUMENT_VERSION, - demandTableVersion: CONDITION_3_DEMAND_TABLE_VERSION, - modelConfiguration: { - ...CONDITION_3_MODEL_CONFIGURATION, - }, - preregistration, - operatorProjections, - operatorAttempts, - impatienceProbeTurn, - genQ02Layer2: CONDITION_3_GEN_Q02_LAYER_2, - recovery, - } - : {}), }; return writeFile(rawPath, JSON.stringify(checkpoint, null, 2)); } @@ -1125,28 +391,18 @@ async function writeArtifacts(): Promise { ); const header = [ - `# Baseline control — condition ${condition} (${condition === "1" ? "bare" : condition === "2" ? "v0 prompt" : "completion + reviewed guidance"})`, + `# Baseline control — condition ${condition} (${condition === "1" ? "bare" : condition === "2" ? "v0 prompt" : "rendered repertoire + plugin definition, prompt only"})`, "", `- Run started: ${startedAt}`, `- Interviewer: ${INTERVIEWER_MODEL}${ condition === "2" ? " + v0-prompt.md" - : condition === "3" - ? " + condition-3-prompt.md" + : condition === "4" + ? " + condition-4-prompt.md + rendered repertoire.yaml + plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml (see condition-4-system.md)" : " (no system prompt)" }`, `- Simulated expert: ${EXPERT_MODEL} + situation-pack.md`, - ...(condition === "3" - ? [ - `- Test-only operator: ${OPERATOR_MODEL}; ${CONDITION_3_INSTRUMENT_VERSION}`, - `- Frozen DemandTable: ${CONDITION_3_DEMAND_TABLE_VERSION}`, - `- Preregistration SHA-256: ${preregistration?.sha256 ?? "missing"}`, - `- Sampling/seed: ${CONDITION_3_STOPPING_RULES.providerSampling}`, - `- Interviewer turns: ${interviewerTurns} (phase-triggered impatience probe at ${impatienceProbeTurn ?? "not triggered"}, forced wrap at ${forceWrapAt})`, - ] - : [ - `- Interviewer turns: ${interviewerTurns} (impatience probe at ${LEGACY_IMPATIENCE_AT}, forced wrap at ${forceWrapAt})`, - ]), + `- Interviewer turns: ${interviewerTurns} (impatience probe at ${IMPATIENCE_AT}, forced wrap at ${FORCE_WRAP_AT})`, `- Stop reason: ${stopReason}`, `- Tokens: ${totals.input} in (+${totals.cacheWrite} cache write, +${totals.cacheRead} cache read) / ${totals.output} out across ${calls.length} calls`, "", @@ -1159,49 +415,21 @@ async function writeArtifacts(): Promise { const speaker = message.role === "assistant" ? "**Interviewer**" - : message.experimentStimulus && !message.expertContent - ? "**Injected experiment stimulus (not expert evidence)**" - : index === 0 - ? "**Opening message**" - : "**Expert (Marta)**"; - if (message.expertContent) { - const stimulus = message.experimentStimulus - ? `\n\n**Injected experiment stimulus (not expert evidence)**:\n\n${message.experimentStimulus}` - : ""; - const diagnostic = message.operatorDiagnostic - ? `\n\n**Test-only operator diagnostic (shown to interviewer)**:\n\n${message.operatorDiagnostic}` - : ""; - return `${speaker}:\n\n${message.expertContent}${stimulus}${diagnostic}`; - } - const continuationText = (message.continuations ?? []) - .map( - (continuation, continuationIndex) => - `\n\n\n\n${continuation.content}`, - ) - .join(""); - return `${speaker}:\n\n${message.content}${continuationText}`; + : index === 0 + ? "**Opening message**" + : "**Expert (Marta)**"; + return `${speaker}:\n\n${message.content}`; }) .join("\n\n---\n\n"); await writeFile(`${transcriptDir}/${artifactStem}.md`, header + body + "\n"); - await writeCheckpoint(stopReason); - if (condition === "3") { + if (condition === "4" && interviewerSystem !== undefined) { await writeFile( - `${transcriptDir}/${artifactStem}.operator.json`, - JSON.stringify( - { - instrumentVersion: CONDITION_3_INSTRUMENT_VERSION, - demandTableVersion: CONDITION_3_DEMAND_TABLE_VERSION, - preregistration, - genQ02Layer2: CONDITION_3_GEN_Q02_LAYER_2, - projections: operatorProjections, - attempts: operatorAttempts, - }, - null, - 2, - ), + `${transcriptDir}/${artifactStem}-system.md`, + `# Condition 4 — assembled interviewer system prompt\n\n${interviewerSystem}\n`, ); } + await writeCheckpoint(stopReason); // The model artifact is the interviewer's final delivery message, verbatim. // Extracting "the model" out of it (the old largest-fenced-block heuristic) @@ -1209,7 +437,7 @@ async function writeArtifacts(): Promise { // model, the other delivered structured markdown with small illustrative // fences, and the heuristic shipped a 517-byte fragment as that run's // artifact. The delivery document is self-describing; readers compare the - // two conditions' documents directly. + // conditions' documents directly. const finalMessage = interviewerMessages.at(-1); if ( stopReason.startsWith("delivered") && @@ -1217,10 +445,7 @@ async function writeArtifacts(): Promise { ) { await writeFile( `${transcriptDir}/${artifactStem}-model.txt`, - finalMessage.content + - (finalMessage.continuations ?? []) - .map((continuation) => continuation.content) - .join(""), + finalMessage.content, ); } else if (stopReason.startsWith("delivered")) { // The transcript header claims a delivery, so a missing artifact must be @@ -1239,131 +464,12 @@ async function writeArtifacts(): Promise { ); } -async function appendCondition3ExpertAnswer( - rawExpertText: string, - turn: number, -): Promise { - const priorProjection = operatorProjections.at(-1); - const floorPassed = - priorProjection !== undefined && - priorProjection.assessments - .filter((assessment) => assessment.clauseId.startsWith("SF-")) - .every((assessment) => assessment.pass); - const expertText = - impatienceProbeTurn === undefined && - floorPassed && - priorProjection.activeObjectiveRows.length > 0 - ? `${rawExpertText}\n\n${IMPATIENCE_LINE}` - : rawExpertText; - if (expertText !== rawExpertText) impatienceProbeTurn = turn; - - const evidenceMessages = [ - ...interviewerMessages, - { - role: "user" as const, - content: expertText, - expertContent: rawExpertText, - ...(expertText !== rawExpertText - ? { experimentStimulus: IMPATIENCE_LINE } - : {}), - }, - ]; - let projection: Condition3Projection; - try { - projection = await callCondition3Operator( - operatorSystem ?? "", - evidenceMessages, - turn, - ); - } catch (error) { - interviewerMessages.push({ - role: "user", - content: expertText, - expertContent: rawExpertText, - ...(expertText !== rawExpertText - ? { experimentStimulus: IMPATIENCE_LINE } - : {}), - }); - stopReason = "operator-projection-failure"; - console.error(error); - await writeArtifacts(); - process.exit(1); - } - - const noProgressStreak = nextCondition3NoProgressStreak( - operatorProjections, - projection, - turn, - priorProjection?.noProgressStreak ?? 0, - ); - const matches = activationMatches(projection); - const previouslySelectedUnsupportedLabels = new Set( - operatorProjections.flatMap(({ selectedUnsupportedAnchorLabel }) => - selectedUnsupportedAnchorLabel === null - ? [] - : [selectedUnsupportedAnchorLabel], - ), - ); - const selectedUnsupportedAnchor = - projection.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors.find( - ({ label, state }) => - state === "active" && !previouslySelectedUnsupportedLabels.has(label), - ); - const selected = selectedUnsupportedAnchor - ? null - : selectedAssessment(projection); - const selectedMatch = selected - ? matches.find((match) => match.clauseId === selected.clauseId) - : undefined; - const projectionRecord: Condition3ProjectionRecord = { - ...projection, - turn, - recordedAt: new Date().toISOString(), - selectedClauseId: (selected?.clauseId as Condition3ClauseId) ?? null, - selectedUnsupportedAnchorLabel: selectedUnsupportedAnchor?.label ?? null, - selectedCardId: selectedMatch?.cardId ?? null, - selectedPredicate: selectedMatch?.predicate ?? null, - activationMatches: matches, - noProgressStreak, - noProgressAdvisory: - noProgressStreak >= CONDITION_3_STOPPING_RULES.noProgressAdvisoryAfter, - }; - operatorProjections.push(projectionRecord); - const operatorDiagnostic = renderOperatorDiagnostic(projectionRecord); - const sessionAdvisory = projectionRecord.noProgressAdvisory - ? `\n\nNP: ${noProgressStreak} consecutive non-material expert frames. This does not assert completion.` - : ""; - interviewerMessages.push({ - role: "user", - content: `${expertText}\n\n${operatorDiagnostic}${sessionAdvisory}`, - expertContent: rawExpertText, - ...(expertText !== rawExpertText - ? { experimentStimulus: IMPATIENCE_LINE } - : {}), - operatorDiagnostic: operatorDiagnostic + sessionAdvisory, - }); - if (noProgressStreak >= CONDITION_3_STOPPING_RULES.noProgressHardStopAfter) { - const closeInstruction = - "NP hard stop: do not ask another question. Produce the best useful result supportable now, with explicit gaps and claim limits; delivery does not assert completion."; - const finalMessage = interviewerMessages.at(-1); - if (finalMessage?.role === "user") { - finalMessage.content += `\n\n${closeInstruction}`; - finalMessage.operatorDiagnostic = `${finalMessage.operatorDiagnostic ?? ""}\n\n${closeInstruction}`; - } - stopReason = "no-progress-hard-stop-pending-delivery"; - await writeCheckpoint(stopReason); - return true; - } - return false; -} - if (mode === "--continue-final") { const final = interviewerMessages.at(-1); if ( final?.role !== "assistant" || !final.truncated || - !stopReason.endsWith("-incomplete") || - (condition === "3" && !stopReason.startsWith("delivered")) + !stopReason.endsWith("-incomplete") ) { console.error( "checkpoint does not end with a truncated interviewer message; nothing to continue", @@ -1371,55 +477,18 @@ if (mode === "--continue-final") { process.exit(1); } const priorMessages = interviewerMessages.slice(0, -1); - const combinedFinalContent = - final.content + - (final.continuations ?? []) - .map((continuation) => continuation.content) - .join(""); const continued = await callInterviewer(interviewerSystem, [ ...priorMessages, - { role: "assistant", content: combinedFinalContent }, + { role: "assistant", content: final.content }, { role: "user", content: CONTINUE_MESSAGE }, ]); - if (condition === "3") { - const newContinuationPieces = continued.sourceText - ? [ - { - content: continued.sourceText, - truncated: true, - recordedAt: new Date().toISOString(), - }, - ...(continued.continuations ?? []), - ] - : [ - { - content: continued.text, - truncated: continued.truncated, - recordedAt: new Date().toISOString(), - }, - ]; - final.continuations = [ - ...(final.continuations ?? []), - ...newContinuationPieces, - ]; - recovery?.seams.push({ - kind: "final-continuation", - sourceHadTruncationMarker: true, - sourceContent: combinedFinalContent, - recordedAt: new Date().toISOString(), - }); - } else { - // Legacy checkpoints retain their reviewed in-place merge behavior. - final.content += continued.text; - } + final.content += continued.text; if (continued.truncated) { console.error( "⚠ still truncated after this continuation — run --continue-final again", ); - } else if (condition !== "3") { + } else { delete final.truncated; - } - if (!continued.truncated && stopReason.endsWith("-incomplete")) { stopReason = stopReason.slice(0, -"-incomplete".length); } await writeArtifacts(); @@ -1427,26 +496,9 @@ if (mode === "--continue-final") { } if (mode === "--resume") { - const resumeAfterForcedWrap = - condition === "3" && stopReason === "forced-wrap-in-progress"; // A delivered checkpoint must never resume: doing so would pop and regenerate the paid // final delivery, then overwrite the transcript. Check the durable reason rather than the // trailing role because a capped non-final interviewer turn also ends with an assistant. - if ( - condition === "3" && - ![ - "in-progress", - "expert-truncated", - "interviewer-truncated", - "no-progress-hard-stop-pending-delivery", - "forced-wrap-in-progress", - ].includes(stopReason) - ) { - console.error( - `condition 3 ended '${stopReason}' — this terminal checkpoint cannot resume`, - ); - process.exit(1); - } if (stopReason.startsWith("delivered")) { console.error( `condition ${condition} already ended '${stopReason}' — resuming would regenerate and ` + @@ -1463,14 +515,6 @@ if (mode === "--resume") { ); process.exit(1); } - if (condition === "3") { - recovery?.seams.push({ - kind: "truncated-expert-regeneration", - sourceHadTruncationMarker: true, - sourceContent: partialExpertReply.content, - recordedAt: new Date().toISOString(), - }); - } // The partial text remains in the stopped checkpoint as evidence, but must never be fed // to the interviewer as a complete answer. Resume removes it and retries the expert call // against the same preceding interviewer question. @@ -1486,7 +530,7 @@ if (mode === "--resume") { 1_500, ); let expertText = expertResult.text; - if (condition !== "3" && interviewerTurns === LEGACY_IMPATIENCE_AT) { + if (interviewerTurns === IMPATIENCE_AT) { expertText = `${expertText}\n\n${IMPATIENCE_LINE}`; } if (expertResult.truncated) { @@ -1502,36 +546,13 @@ if (mode === "--resume") { await writeArtifacts(); process.exit(0); } - if (condition === "3") { - const stopped = await appendCondition3ExpertAnswer( - expertText, - interviewerTurns, - ); - if (stopped) { - noProgressClosePending = true; - } - } else { - interviewerMessages.push({ role: "user", content: expertText }); - } - if (!noProgressClosePending) await writeCheckpoint("in-progress"); + interviewerMessages.push({ role: "user", content: expertText }); + await writeCheckpoint("in-progress"); } // Checkpoints are written after complete exchanges only, but tolerate a trailing // assistant message by regenerating that turn. - if (!noProgressClosePending) stopReason = "hard-stop"; - const last = interviewerMessages.at(-1); - if (last?.role === "assistant" && !resumeAfterForcedWrap) { - if (condition === "3" && last.truncated) { - recovery?.seams.push({ - kind: "truncated-interviewer-regeneration", - sourceHadTruncationMarker: true, - sourceContent: - last.content + - (last.continuations ?? []) - .map((continuation) => continuation.content) - .join(""), - recordedAt: new Date().toISOString(), - }); - } + stopReason = "hard-stop"; + if (interviewerMessages.at(-1)?.role === "assistant") { interviewerMessages.pop(); } interviewerTurns = interviewerMessages.filter( @@ -1542,20 +563,8 @@ if (mode === "--resume") { ); } -while (interviewerTurns < hardStopAt) { +while (interviewerTurns < HARD_STOP_AT) { interviewerTurns++; - if ( - condition === "3" && - interviewerTurns >= forceWrapAt && - !noProgressClosePending && - interviewerMessages.at(-1)?.experimentStimulus !== FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE - ) { - interviewerMessages.push({ - role: "user", - content: `${FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE}`, - experimentStimulus: FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE, - }); - } console.error(`turn ${interviewerTurns} (interviewer)`); const interviewer = await callInterviewer( interviewerSystem, @@ -1563,19 +572,13 @@ while (interviewerTurns < hardStopAt) { ); interviewerMessages.push({ role: "assistant", - content: interviewer.sourceText ?? interviewer.text, - ...(interviewer.sourceText || interviewer.truncated - ? { truncated: true as const } - : {}), - ...(interviewer.continuations - ? { continuations: interviewer.continuations } - : {}), + content: interviewer.text, + ...(interviewer.truncated ? { truncated: true as const } : {}), }); if (await isFinalModel(interviewer.text)) { - stopReason = noProgressClosePending - ? "delivered-after-no-progress-hard-stop" - : interviewerTurns >= forceWrapAt + stopReason = + interviewerTurns >= FORCE_WRAP_AT ? "delivered-after-forced-wrap" : "delivered"; if (interviewer.truncated) { @@ -1588,13 +591,6 @@ while (interviewerTurns < hardStopAt) { break; } - if (noProgressClosePending) { - stopReason = interviewer.truncated - ? "no-progress-hard-stop-undelivered-incomplete" - : "no-progress-hard-stop-undelivered"; - break; - } - if (interviewer.truncated) { stopReason = "interviewer-truncated"; console.error( @@ -1605,16 +601,9 @@ while (interviewerTurns < hardStopAt) { break; } - if (condition === "3" && interviewerTurns >= forceWrapAt) { - if (interviewerTurns < hardStopAt) { - await writeCheckpoint("forced-wrap-in-progress"); - } - continue; - } - let expertText: string; let expertTruncated = false; - if (interviewerTurns >= forceWrapAt) { + if (interviewerTurns >= FORCE_WRAP_AT) { expertText = FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE; } else { console.error(`turn ${interviewerTurns} (expert)`); @@ -1627,26 +616,15 @@ while (interviewerTurns < hardStopAt) { ); expertText = expertResult.text; expertTruncated = expertResult.truncated; - if (condition !== "3" && interviewerTurns === LEGACY_IMPATIENCE_AT) { + if (interviewerTurns === IMPATIENCE_AT) { expertText = `${expertText}\n\n${IMPATIENCE_LINE}`; } } - if (condition === "3" && !expertTruncated) { - const stopped = await appendCondition3ExpertAnswer( - expertText, - interviewerTurns, - ); - if (stopped) { - noProgressClosePending = true; - continue; - } - } else { - interviewerMessages.push({ - role: "user", - content: expertText, - ...(expertTruncated ? { truncated: true as const } : {}), - }); - } + interviewerMessages.push({ + role: "user", + content: expertText, + ...(expertTruncated ? { truncated: true as const } : {}), + }); if (expertTruncated) { stopReason = "expert-truncated"; console.error( @@ -1658,9 +636,4 @@ while (interviewerTurns < hardStopAt) { await writeCheckpoint("in-progress"); } -if (stopReason === "no-progress-hard-stop-pending-delivery") { - throw new Error( - "condition-3 invariant violated: the no-progress closing interviewer turn exceeded the hard budget", - ); -} await writeArtifacts(); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/.oxlintrc.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/.oxlintrc.json index d7cfb823d33..e0d9643fe1a 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/.oxlintrc.json +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/.oxlintrc.json @@ -34,8 +34,11 @@ "message": "Brunch libraries must not depend on Petrinaut implementations." }, { - "group": ["@hashintel/brunch-agent-*"], - "message": "A binding may depend inward on the harness, not on Brunch extensions." + "group": [ + "@hashintel/brunch-agent-*", + "!@hashintel/brunch-agent-repertoire" + ], + "message": "A binding may depend inward on the harness and render its repertoire, not depend on other Brunch extensions." } ] } diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/package.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/package.json index d7a4463edbb..b6ee0a543ea 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/package.json +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/package.json @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ "@flue/runtime": "2.0.3", "@flue/sdk": "2.0.3", "@hashintel/brunch-agent": "workspace:*", + "@hashintel/brunch-agent-repertoire": "workspace:*", "valibot": "1.4.2" }, "devDependencies": { diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/index.ts index 464f16298bf..90f50222bdc 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/index.ts @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ import { buildSweepList, buildSweepRepairSignal, completionDemands, - completionProtocolInstructionFragments, computeUnaccountedAskAdvisories, createSweepExtractionResultSchema, createInitialSweepState, @@ -47,7 +46,7 @@ import { mintAskAffordance, parseSweepState, pendingSweepRepair, - pluginFileInstructions, + renderInstructions, reopenSweepAfterRefusal, settlementProtocolInstructionFragments, slotAssertionExtractionGuidance, @@ -59,6 +58,7 @@ import { type Plugin, type SweepState, } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent"; +import { repertoire } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-repertoire"; import { capturedUserEntryIdsForSession } from "./capture-accounting"; import { @@ -113,17 +113,24 @@ export function useElicitation( let pendingAtFinish = pending; let sweepState = parseSweepState(storedSweepState); const extractionResult = createSweepExtractionResultSchema(plugin); - const { file } = plugin; - const demands = file === undefined ? undefined : completionDemands(file); + const { definition } = plugin; + // The fold and the completion cue know slot assertions; a definition whose + // proposals do not include them has a model the harness cannot yet fold. + const slotModel = + definition?.proposals.some((p) => p.type === "slot-asserted") === true + ? definition + : undefined; + const demands = + slotModel === undefined ? undefined : completionDemands(slotModel); // Read-time derivation, never stored: fold the active captures, evaluate // completion over the objective slices, and render the cue (ADR-0003, // ADR-0006). Returned as a tool result so the model sees a harness fact // without any state reaching the instructions. const completionCue = (snapshot: CaptureStoreSnapshot) => { - if (file === undefined || demands === undefined) return undefined; - const model = foldElicitedModel(snapshot, file); + if (slotModel === undefined || demands === undefined) return undefined; + const model = foldElicitedModel(snapshot, slotModel); const report = evaluateCompletion(model, demands); - const sweepList = buildSweepList(model, report, file.patterns); + const sweepList = buildSweepList(model, report, slotModel.patterns); return { complete: report.complete, revision: report.revision, @@ -196,9 +203,9 @@ export function useElicitation( proposalNames: plugin.proposalCatalog.map( (proposal) => proposal.name, ), - ...(file === undefined + ...(slotModel === undefined ? {} - : { guidance: slotAssertionExtractionGuidance(file) }), + : { guidance: slotAssertionExtractionGuidance(slotModel) }), }, range, ), @@ -255,7 +262,7 @@ export function useElicitation( ...("advisories" in applied.value ? applied.value.advisories : []), ...computeUnaccountedAskAdvisories(range, accountedEntryIds), ], - ...(file === undefined + ...(slotModel === undefined ? {} : { completion: completionCue(applied.snapshot) }), }, @@ -295,11 +302,8 @@ export function useElicitation( return [ ...askProtocolInstructionFragments(plugin.targetFormalism), ...settlementProtocolInstructionFragments(), - ...(file === undefined + ...(definition === undefined ? [] - : [ - ...completionProtocolInstructionFragments(), - pluginFileInstructions(file), - ]), + : [renderInstructions(repertoire, definition)]), ].join("\n\n"); } diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/raw-imports.d.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/raw-imports.d.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9eaedc06726 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/raw-imports.d.ts @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +/** Vite's `?raw` import: the repertoire and plugin definitions reach the binding as strings. */ +declare module "*.yaml?raw" { + const yaml: string; + export default yaml; +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json index 10899eaaf31..ecabeede0eb 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json @@ -30,15 +30,18 @@ "linear:graph": "node --experimental-strip-types ../../scripts/linear-project-graph.ts", "lint:eslint": "oxlint --type-aware --type-check --report-unused-disable-directives-severity=error .", "lint:tsc": "tsgo --noEmit", + "schema:emit": "PLUGIN_SCHEMA_EMIT=1 vitest run test/plugin-schema.test.ts", "test:unit": "vitest run" }, "dependencies": { - "valibot": "1.4.2" + "valibot": "1.4.2", + "yaml": "2.9.0" }, "devDependencies": { "@anthropic-ai/sdk": "0.74.0", "@types/node": "22.18.13", "@typescript/native-preview": "7.0.0-dev.20260511.1", + "@valibot/to-json-schema": "1.7.1", "fast-check": "4.9.0", "oxlint": "1.63.0", "oxlint-tsgolint": "0.22.1", diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f505e8fa76d --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +# Plugin schema changelog + +The key catalogue is a working set until a co-authoring cycle changes no key +(ADR-0007 decision 9). Each cycle records here what it added, merged, dropped, +or left alone, and why, with the evidence that moved it. `plugin.schema.json` +is derived from `PluginDefinitionSchema` in `src/plugin-definition.ts`; a test +fails when the two drift. + +## Cycle 1 — 2026-08-25 + +First materialisation. Both test-case plugins (`plugin-sdcpn`, `plugin-gherkin`) +and the repertoire were written against this shape together. + +- **Groups:** `plugin` (identity, not a key), `ontology`, `schema`, `patterns`, + `guidance`, `runbooks`, `machinery`. +- **Contract keys:** `ontology.kinds` (`kind`, `is`, `projects_to`), optional + `ontology.not_kinds` and `ontology.attributes`; `schema.anchor` (declared, + replacing the `objective`-by-convention anchor of the Markdown plugin file), + `schema.floor`, `schema.must_know`, `schema.proposals`; `patterns.items` + (`id`, `on`, `when`, `ask`). +- **Guidance keys:** `lenses`, `techniques`, `movements{slice,sweep}`, + `licenses`, `motifs`, `smells`, `rabbit_holes`, `failure_modes` — each a + list of `{name, text, signature?, source?}` so that default and cell + concatenate. +- **Runbook keys:** `kickoff`, `trajectory`, `close` per declared job. +- **Machinery:** `checks` and `tools` as identifier lists; nothing consumes + them yet. +- **Dropped from the Markdown plugin file:** the precision-words table (now + harness vocabulary, `PRECISION_LADDER`), the `Moves` and `Deliverable` prose + sections (their content is distributed over guidance and runbook keys), and + the fixed heading order as the contract (the schema is). +- **Open after this cycle:** whether `motifs` needs parameters as data rather + than prose; whether `licenses` has any plugin-specific content at all (both + plugins left it blank); whether `machinery.checks` should name harness + check implementations or plugin-provided ones. + +## Cycle 2 — input, 2026-08-25 + +What the first cycle's "validate" step returned. Source: the desk pressure review +[`docs/evidence/proofs/design/plugin-keys-pressure-review-cycle-1.md`](../../../docs/evidence/proofs/design/plugin-keys-pressure-review-cycle-1.md) +(100 situations from the CPS process-modelling material, the literature review, +and the condition-2 run; a discrete-event and a formal-verification plugin +sketched against the keys). The condition-4 baseline run (the rendered layer as +a prompt only) adds its strains in +`docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline/readout.md`. + +**Verdict on the catalogue: not frozen.** No key is added, merged, dropped, +split, or renamed by this input. All 100 situations land on an existing key or +contract row (33 carried by the repertoire default, 29 by sdcpn content, 38 +expressible but unwritten, 0 inexpressible). Two key *shapes* must change and +one matching defect was fixed before the catalogue can be said to have been +written against. + +### Fixed in this cycle + +- **`patterns.items[*].on: []` never fired.** `buildSweepList` tested + `kinds.includes(node.kind)`, which is false for an empty list, while the + contract documents "empty means any node". sdcpn `P08` (source-regime + divergence) therefore never reached the interviewer as a harness fact. + Fixed in `src/cue.ts`; `test/cue.test.ts` now covers a pattern indexed on no + kind firing on a failing node of another kind. + +### Shape changes proposed (inside existing keys) + +1. **`patterns.items[*].slot?: string`** — optional; when present the harness + surfaces the pattern only while *that* slot on the node is unsatisfied. + Evidence: kind-only matching makes sdcpn P01 and P02 indistinguishable at + fire time (both surface on any failing `activity`); a state-dependent + failure rate has no trigger at all; the archived CPS cards carried + slot-state predicates that the migration dropped. Cost to gherkin: none + (P01 would gain `slot: the examples that illustrate it`, P03 + `slot: the observable outcome`). +2. **`schema.must_know[*].precision` accepts a list (any-of).** A single word + forces the wrong word or a split row: sdcpn "the arrival or availability + pattern: spread" cannot accept a shift calendar (`spelled out`); "what + 'better' means: range" cannot accept a lexicographic cliff/slope rule + (`spelled out`). Cost to gherkin and the formal-verification sketch: none — + every row stays one word. +3. **Repertoire entry applicability facet** — e.g. `for_precision?: [range, + spread]` on a repertoire item; `renderGuidance` renders it only when some + `must_know` row of the plugin demands one of those words. Not a plugin + override (decision 1 holds: the harness decides from the plugin's own + contract data). Evidence: six of the repertoire's 36 guidance entries are + quantity methods ("Mean or tail", "Quantiles, never three points", "The + clairvoyant test", "Premortem", kickoff "numerically where possible", sweep + "every step has a duration") rendered for gherkin and for a + formal-verification plugin, where they are noise; and the lens "Policy + versus practice" is one a specification-of-intent plugin (gherkin + `status: proposed`, any verification property) must *contradict*, which + decision 1 forbids — it needs the same facet or a conditioned text. + +### Content findings (no schema change; edits due in this cycle) + +- **Specificity.** sdcpn `motifs` are six name-only lines that restate the + patterns 1:1 and violate the repertoire's own "Name plus variant" default + rendered directly above them; each needs its axis (server semantics — + indivisible vs several; batch formation rule — count *or* clock; several + wear components — weakest decides). Quantile elicitation is stated four + times in the sdcpn render; "every rule has an example" four times in the + gherkin render. Cells add and never override, but nothing says they never + repeat and no gate checks it — a "cells add, never repeat" test is worth + adding. +- **Selection half missing.** `kickoff` produces a posture and nothing + consumes it: the `trajectory` default has no posture-varied biases (ADR + decision 2's "explore openly when appetite is high, synthesise and invite + correction when constrained, propose low-risk structure"). Write them or + drop posture from `kickoff`. +- **Repertoire under-fill against ADR decision 2's own rows.** `licenses` + lacks "press a busy expert", "decline to sweep", "propose structure as a + suggestion"; `rabbit_holes` lacks "asking the expert what you failed to + ask", "restating the whole model", "taking a schedule or a document for the + practised rule"; `smells` lacks "schema-shaped questioning" and + "correction-as-duplication"; `kickoff` lacks boundaries / horizon / + experimental factors / accuracy bar; `close` (construct) names no stopping + outcomes. +- **Contract data.** `ontology.attributes` renders as prose; `source-regime` + works only because the harness hard-codes it. The never-asked sdcpn row + (`activity` — what is lost when it changes the system's mode) is + `not_applicable: true` and can be ticked away without a question, which + reproduces condition 2's ramp-scrap omission. Gherkin `step — the known step + it binds to: named` needs a team step lexicon the interviewer cannot see: + a plugin needs reference *data* that is neither cell nor code. +- **Contradictions the repertoire resolves silently** (must be stated, not + fixed by fiat): the clearinghouse probe is licensed by `movements.sweep` + and forbidden by the archived CPS guidance, the condition-3 prompt, and + ADR-0007's `rabbit_holes` row; the quantile order is v0's typical-first + while citing the IDEA protocol's interval-first; batching 2–4 is stated as + a license without its single-run basis; "hypotheticals only from a real + case" would forbid condition 2's most productive move (four constructed + scenarios); "Restate to check" / "Assent taken as origin" do not say how a + confirmed interviewer inference becomes a capture; "No structure in the + first exchange" then asks for a three-to-six-step account, which is + structure; sdcpn "depth on IR-only kinds" defers `validation-criterion` + where the literature puts the accuracy bar before building. + +### Considered and left + +- `motifs` parameters as data — nothing consumes them; fix the content first + (open item carried from cycle 1). +- Merge `motifs` into `patterns` — they differ by mechanism (attention + scaffold vs matched trigger); gherkin's motifs have no pattern twin. +- Merge `smells` into `failure_modes` — the frame distinction (own output vs + named failure) is sound; authors are not honouring it. +- Drop the plugin cell of `licenses` — both blank, zero cost, and a cell that + contradicts a default is better detected present than absent. +- Add a `scope` runbook key — `kickoff` and `close` carry it once written. +- Add a fourth movement (`cross-examine`) — the consistency probe is a + technique; soundness questions need projection machinery first. +- Make `ontology.attributes` data — promote when a second attribute needs the + fold, not before. +- `movements` fixed to `{slice, sweep}` — every formalism examined fits the + pair; a single-walkthrough formalism would leave `sweep` empty, which the + schema allows for plugins. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8e062817933 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json @@ -0,0 +1,733 @@ +{ + "$id": "https://hash.ai/brunch-agent/plugin.schema.json", + "title": "Brunch plugin definition", + "description": "A plugin is data under harness-owned keys (ADR-0007). Cross-references the schema cannot state — rows name declared kinds, the anchor is a row, runbooks belong to declared jobs — are checked by readPluginDefinition.", + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "plugin": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "pattern": "^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*$" + }, + "version": { + "type": "string", + "pattern": "^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*\\/\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}\\.\\d+$" + }, + "formalism": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "jobs": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "enum": ["construct", "review-and-revise"], + "type": "string" + }, + "minItems": 1 + }, + "purpose": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["id", "version", "formalism", "jobs", "purpose"], + "additionalProperties": false + }, + "ontology": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "preamble": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "kinds": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "kind": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "is": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "projects_to": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["kind", "is", "projects_to"], + "additionalProperties": false + }, + "minItems": 1 + }, + "not_kinds": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "attributes": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "on": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "values": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "on", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + } + }, + "required": ["kinds"], + "additionalProperties": false + }, + "schema": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "preamble": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "anchor": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "kind": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "depends_on": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["kind", "depends_on"], + "additionalProperties": false + }, + "floor": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "kind": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "at_least": { + "type": "integer", + "minimum": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["kind", "at_least"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "must_know": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "kind": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "slot": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "precision": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "enum": [ + "named", + "number", + "range", + "spread", + "spelled out" + ], + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "string", + "pattern": "^at least [1-9]\\d*$" + } + ] + }, + "not_applicable": { + "type": "boolean" + }, + "why": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["kind", "slot", "precision", "not_applicable", "why"], + "additionalProperties": false + }, + "minItems": 1 + }, + "proposals": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "type": { + "type": "string", + "pattern": "^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*$" + }, + "payload": { + "type": "string", + "pattern": "^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*$" + } + }, + "required": ["type", "payload"], + "additionalProperties": false + }, + "minItems": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["anchor", "floor", "must_know", "proposals"], + "additionalProperties": false + }, + "patterns": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "preamble": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "items": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "pattern": "^P\\d{2}$" + }, + "on": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "when": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "ask": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["id", "on", "when", "ask"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + } + }, + "required": ["items"], + "additionalProperties": false + }, + "guidance": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "lenses": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "techniques": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "movements": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "slice": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "sweep": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + } + }, + "required": ["slice", "sweep"], + "additionalProperties": false + }, + "licenses": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "motifs": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "smells": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "rabbit_holes": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "failure_modes": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + } + }, + "required": [ + "lenses", + "techniques", + "movements", + "licenses", + "motifs", + "smells", + "rabbit_holes", + "failure_modes" + ], + "additionalProperties": false + }, + "runbooks": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "construct": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "kickoff": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "trajectory": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "close": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + } + }, + "required": ["kickoff", "trajectory", "close"], + "additionalProperties": false + }, + "review-and-revise": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "kickoff": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "trajectory": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "close": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "text": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "signature": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, + "source": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": ["name", "text"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + } + }, + "required": ["kickoff", "trajectory", "close"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "required": [], + "additionalProperties": false + }, + "machinery": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "checks": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "string", + "pattern": "^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*$" + } + }, + "tools": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "string", + "pattern": "^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*$" + } + } + }, + "required": ["checks", "tools"], + "additionalProperties": false + } + }, + "required": [ + "plugin", + "ontology", + "schema", + "patterns", + "guidance", + "runbooks", + "machinery" + ], + "additionalProperties": false, + "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#" +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/completion.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/completion.ts index 1632980b4da..2e882d62557 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/completion.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/completion.ts @@ -18,10 +18,10 @@ import { import { type FloorRow, type MustKnowRow, - type PluginFile, + type PluginDefinition, type PrecisionDemand, type PrecisionWord, -} from "./plugin-file"; +} from "./plugin-definition"; import type { JsonValue } from "./json-value"; @@ -92,20 +92,20 @@ export interface CompletionDemands { readonly anchor?: CompletionAnchor; } -export const ANCHOR_KIND = "objective"; - -/** The demands one plugin file states, with the SDCPN default for accepted statuses. */ +/** The demands one plugin definition states, with `explicit` as the default accepted status. */ export const completionDemands = ( - file: PluginFile, + definition: PluginDefinition, options: { readonly acceptedStatuses?: readonly EpistemicStatus[] } = {}, ): CompletionDemands => { - const anchorRow = file.mustKnow.find( - (row) => row.kind === ANCHOR_KIND && row.precision.kind === "at-least", + const anchorRow = definition.mustKnow.find( + (row) => + row.kind === definition.anchor.kind && + row.slot === definition.anchor.dependencySlot, ); return { - pluginVersion: file.version, - floor: file.floor, - rows: file.mustKnow, + pluginVersion: definition.version, + floor: definition.floor, + rows: definition.mustKnow, acceptedStatuses: options.acceptedStatuses ?? ["explicit"], ...(anchorRow && anchorRow.precision.kind === "at-least" ? { @@ -260,10 +260,19 @@ const evaluateRow = ( return null; }; -const dependencyIds = (slot: SlotState | undefined): readonly string[] => - slot?.state === "value" && Array.isArray(slot.value) - ? slot.value.filter((entry): entry is string => typeof entry === "string") +const dependencyIds = (slot: SlotState | undefined): readonly string[] => { + if (slot?.state !== "value") { + return []; + } + if (Array.isArray(slot.value)) { + return slot.value.filter( + (entry): entry is string => typeof entry === "string", + ); + } + return typeof slot.value === "string" && slot.value !== "" + ? [slot.value] : []; +}; export function evaluateCompletion( model: ElicitedModel, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/cue.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/cue.ts index d3de170da75..07e073a29b3 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/cue.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/cue.ts @@ -2,7 +2,8 @@ * The cue — what the harness tells the interviewer after it has read the model. * * A sweep list is the completion report's failures plus the patterns whose - * kind-index matches a node that still has one. It is a harness fact, so it + * kind-index matches a node that still has one (an empty index matches every + * kind, as the plugin contract documents). It is a harness fact, so it * reaches the model as a tool result or a signal entry, never interpolated * into instructions (Flue routing: "you need the model to see a harness fact"). * Patterns are surfaced, never mandated; the interviewer decides. @@ -10,7 +11,7 @@ import { type CompletionFailure, type CompletionReport } from "./completion"; import { type ElicitedModel } from "./elicited-model"; -import { type PatternRow } from "./plugin-file"; +import { type PatternRow } from "./plugin-definition"; export interface PatternCue { readonly id: string; @@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ export const buildSweepList = ( for (const node of model.nodes) { if (!failingNodeIds.has(node.id)) continue; for (const pattern of patterns) { - if (pattern.kinds.includes(node.kind)) { + if (pattern.kinds.length === 0 || pattern.kinds.includes(node.kind)) { cues.push({ id: pattern.id, nodeId: node.id, ask: pattern.ask }); } } @@ -104,8 +105,3 @@ export const buildCompletionCueSignal = ( body: parts.join("\n\n"), }; }; - -export const completionProtocolInstructionFragments = (): readonly string[] => [ - "After each applied sweep the harness folds the active captures into the model and reports which demanded slots are unsatisfied and why, with the patterns whose trigger may apply. Read it as a map of what is still unknown, not as an instruction to ask.", - "A slot is satisfied only by what the expert said or confirmed, at the precision the row demands. Never state a value the expert did not give; record what you would assume in the assumption ledger and ask.", -]; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/elicited-model.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/elicited-model.ts index 131d2c6130b..bd79b718350 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/elicited-model.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/elicited-model.ts @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ import { type CaptureStoreSnapshot, type EpistemicStatus, } from "./capture-store"; -import { type PluginFile, type PrecisionWord } from "./plugin-file"; +import { type PluginDefinition, type PrecisionWord } from "./plugin-definition"; import { createSlotAssertionSchema, nodeId, @@ -196,12 +196,12 @@ const settleSlot = ( const isEvidenced = (capture: CaptureEnvelope): boolean => "evidence" in capture && capture.evidence.length > 0; -/** Fold the active captures of one snapshot into the model a plugin file describes. */ +/** Fold the active captures of one snapshot into the model a plugin definition describes. */ export function foldElicitedModel( snapshot: CaptureStoreSnapshot, - file: PluginFile, + definition: PluginDefinition, ): ElicitedModel { - const assertionSchema = createSlotAssertionSchema(file); + const assertionSchema = createSlotAssertionSchema(definition); const active = snapshot.captures.filter( (capture) => deriveCaptureStatus(snapshot, capture.id) === "active", ); @@ -276,12 +276,12 @@ export function foldElicitedModel( canonical({ active: [...activeCaptureIds].sort(), conflicts: openConflictIssues.map((issue) => issue.id).sort(), - plugin: file.version, + plugin: definition.version, }), ); return { - pluginVersion: file.version, + pluginVersion: definition.version, revision, nodes, unmapped, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/index.ts index 81f3ced1001..113bb307682 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/index.ts @@ -48,21 +48,62 @@ export { type PluginProposalType, } from "./plugin"; export { + GUIDANCE_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS, + GUIDANCE_KEYS, + JOB_TITLES, + JOBS, + MOVEMENTS, + RUNBOOK_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS, + RUNBOOK_KEYS, + type GuidanceKey, + type Job, + type KeyDescription, + type MechanismType, + type Movement, + type RunbookKey, +} from "./keys"; +export { + guidanceEntries, + GuidanceCellsSchema, + GuidanceItemSchema, mustKnowRowsFor, - parsePluginFile, - PLUGIN_FILE_HEADINGS, - PluginFileError, - pluginFileInstructions, + PluginDefinitionError, + PluginDefinitionSchema, + PRECISION_LADDER, PRECISION_WORDS, + readPluginDefinition, + readYamlAs, + runbookEntries, + RunbookCellsSchema, + type Anchor, + type AttributeNote, type FloorRow, + type GuidanceCells, + type GuidanceItem, type KindRow, + type MovementCells, type MustKnowRow, + type NamedText, type PatternRow, - type PluginFile, - type PluginFileHeading, + type PluginDefinition, + type PluginDefinitionInput, type PrecisionDemand, type PrecisionWord, -} from "./plugin-file"; + type ProposalDeclaration, + type RunbookCells, +} from "./plugin-definition"; +export { + readRepertoire, + RepertoireSchema, + type Repertoire, +} from "./repertoire"; +export { + HARNESS_PREAMBLE, + renderContract, + renderGuidance, + renderInstructions, + renderRunbook, +} from "./instructions"; export { createSlotAssertionSchema, nodeId, @@ -82,7 +123,6 @@ export { type UnmappedCapture, } from "./elicited-model"; export { - ANCHOR_KIND, COMPLETION_DIAGNOSTICS, completionDemands, evaluateCompletion, @@ -97,7 +137,6 @@ export { export { buildCompletionCueSignal, buildSweepList, - completionProtocolInstructionFragments, type CompletionCueSignal, type PatternCue, type SweepList, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/instructions.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/instructions.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1c132859ac5 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/instructions.ts @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@ +/** + * Rendering the interviewer's instructions from the repertoire and a plugin + * definition (ADR-0007 decision 1): key by key, the key's definition, then the + * harness default, then the plugin's cell if it is not blank. + * + * The fixed harness preamble states what the harness itself enforces — + * completion, the sweep list, the assumption ledger, the affected slice — so + * that no plugin cell has to. Everything else the interviewer reads about the + * formalism comes from the definition's contract keys, rendered as text here + * because the model reads text; the same data parameterises the fold and the + * completion evaluation elsewhere. + */ + +import { + GUIDANCE_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS, + GUIDANCE_KEYS, + JOB_TITLES, + MOVEMENTS, + RUNBOOK_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS, + RUNBOOK_KEYS, + type Job, +} from "./keys"; +import { + PRECISION_LADDER, + type GuidanceItem, + type PluginDefinition, + type PrecisionDemand, +} from "./plugin-definition"; +import { type Repertoire } from "./repertoire"; + +/** + * What the harness enforces, stated once. These are facts about mechanism the + * interviewer must know and no plugin may restate. + */ +export const HARNESS_PREAMBLE: readonly string[] = [ + "The harness keeps the model, not you. Every value it holds comes from a capture you made from the expert's words; you never edit the model, you add captures, and a later capture supersedes an earlier one.", + "After each applied sweep the harness folds the active captures into the model and reports which demanded slots are unsatisfied and why, with the patterns whose trigger may apply. Read it as a map of what is still unknown, not as an instruction to ask.", + "A slot is satisfied only by what the expert said or confirmed, at the precision the row demands. Never state a value the expert did not give; record what you would assume in the assumption ledger and ask.", + "Completion is computed from the model by the harness — the floor, then every node in the dependency slice of every active anchor. Whether the session may stop is the harness's decision; yours is to say what the model can now support and what it cannot.", + "For the review-and-revise job the harness computes the affected slice — the node, its slots, every anchor whose slice contains it, and what those project to — and nothing outside it changes.", +]; + +const renderItems = (items: readonly GuidanceItem[]): string[] => + items.map((item) => { + const signature = + item.signature === undefined ? "" : ` _Signature:_ ${item.signature}`; + return `- **${item.name}** — ${item.text.trim()}${signature}`; + }); + +const renderDemand = (demand: PrecisionDemand): string => + demand.kind === "word" ? demand.word : `at least ${demand.count}`; + +const paragraphs = (...parts: (string | undefined)[]): string[] => + parts.flatMap((part) => + part === undefined || part.trim() === "" ? [] : [part.trim()], + ); + +/** The contract keys as text: purpose, kinds, rows, floor, anchor, patterns. */ +export const renderContract = (definition: PluginDefinition): string[] => { + const kinds = definition.kinds.map( + (row) => + `- \`${row.kind}\` — ${row.description.trim()} _Projects to:_ ${row.projectsTo}.`, + ); + const notKinds = definition.ontology.notKinds.map( + (entry) => `- **${entry.name}** — ${entry.text.trim()}`, + ); + const attributes = definition.ontology.attributes.map((entry) => { + const values = + entry.values === undefined + ? "" + : ` (${entry.values.map((value) => `\`${value}\``).join(" | ")})`; + return `- **${entry.name}**${values}, on ${entry.on} — ${entry.text.trim()}`; + }); + const rows = definition.kinds.map((kindRow) => { + const own = definition.mustKnow + .filter((row) => row.kind === kindRow.kind) + .map( + (row) => + ` - ${row.slot} — ${renderDemand(row.precision)}${row.notApplicableAllowed ? '; "not applicable" is accepted' : ""}. _Why:_ ${row.why}`, + ); + return [`- \`${kindRow.kind}\``, ...own].join("\n"); + }); + const floor = definition.floor + .map((row) => `${row.atLeast} \`${row.kind}\``) + .join(", "); + const ladder = Object.entries(PRECISION_LADDER).map( + ([word, meaning]) => `- \`${word}\` — ${meaning}`, + ); + const patterns = definition.patterns.map( + (row) => + `- **${row.id}** — _when_ ${row.when.trim()} — _ask_ ${row.ask.trim()}`, + ); + return [ + `## Purpose\n\n${definition.identity.purpose.trim()}`, + [ + "## Kinds", + ...paragraphs(definition.ontology.preamble), + kinds.join("\n"), + ...(notKinds.length === 0 + ? [] + : [ + `Things that look like kinds and are not:\n\n${notKinds.join("\n")}`, + ]), + ...(attributes.length === 0 + ? [] + : [`Attributes on every kind:\n\n${attributes.join("\n")}`]), + ].join("\n\n"), + [ + "## Must know", + ...paragraphs(definition.schemaPreamble), + rows.join("\n"), + `Static floor — before anything \`${definition.anchor.kind}\`-relative counts, the model must contain at least ${floor}. Presence is a count; the floor assigns no precision.`, + `Anchor — completion is relative to \`${definition.anchor.kind}\` nodes: the model is complete when the floor holds and every node named in each active anchor's "${definition.anchor.dependencySlot}" satisfies its kind's rows. Nodes outside every slice are recorded, not demanded.`, + `Precision words:\n\n${ladder.join("\n")}\n\nPrecision says how much a value narrows what it could mean, not where it came from; an honest value at the wrong precision and an invented value at the right one are tracked separately and neither substitutes for the other.`, + ].join("\n\n"), + ...(definition.patterns.length === 0 + ? [] + : [ + [ + "## Patterns", + ...paragraphs(definition.patternsPreamble), + patterns.join("\n"), + ].join("\n\n"), + ]), + ]; +}; + +/** The guidance keys, interleaved: definition, repertoire default, plugin cell. */ +export const renderGuidance = ( + repertoire: Repertoire, + definition: PluginDefinition, +): string[] => + GUIDANCE_KEYS.map((key) => { + const description = GUIDANCE_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS[key]; + const body = + key === "movements" + ? MOVEMENTS.flatMap((movement) => [ + `### ${movement === "slice" ? "Slice" : "Sweep"}`, + [ + ...renderItems(repertoire.guidance.movements[movement]), + ...renderItems(definition.guidance.movements[movement]), + ].join("\n"), + ]) + : [ + [ + ...renderItems(repertoire.guidance[key]), + ...renderItems(definition.guidance[key]), + ].join("\n"), + ]; + return [`## ${description.title}`, `_${description.definition}_`, ...body] + .filter((part) => part !== "") + .join("\n\n"); + }); + +/** One job's runbook: each runbook key's definition, default, and plugin cell. */ +export const renderRunbook = ( + repertoire: Repertoire, + definition: PluginDefinition, + job: Job, +): string => { + const cells = definition.runbooks[job]; + const sections = RUNBOOK_KEYS.map((key) => { + const description = RUNBOOK_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS[key]; + return [ + `### ${description.title}`, + `_${description.definition}_`, + [ + ...renderItems(repertoire.runbooks[job][key]), + ...renderItems(cells?.[key] ?? []), + ].join("\n"), + ].join("\n\n"); + }); + return [`## ${JOB_TITLES[job]}`, ...sections].join("\n\n"); +}; + +/** + * The whole instruction text for one plugin under one repertoire, in contract + * order: harness preamble, contract, guidance, one runbook per supported job. + */ +export const renderInstructions = ( + repertoire: Repertoire, + definition: PluginDefinition, +): string => + [ + `## What the harness enforces\n\n${HARNESS_PREAMBLE.join("\n\n")}`, + ...renderContract(definition), + ...renderGuidance(repertoire, definition), + ...definition.identity.jobs.map((job) => + renderRunbook(repertoire, definition, job), + ), + ].join("\n\n"); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/keys.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/keys.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cd1108137c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/keys.ts @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ +/** + * The keys of plugin authoring (ADR-0007). + * + * Every key is owned by the harness: the harness defines the concept the key + * names, teaches it through the repertoire's default, and a plugin specialises + * it in a cell written in the harness's terms. This file is the catalogue — + * which keys exist, in which group, working through which mechanism, and the + * one-paragraph definition the interviewer reads above every rendered key. + * + * The catalogue is a working set until a co-authoring cycle changes no key + * (ADR-0007 decision 9). Changes are recorded in `schema/CHANGELOG.md`, beside + * the JSON schema derived from `plugin-definition.ts`. + */ + +/** The jobs the harness names without any plugin (ADR-0007 decision 4). */ +export const JOBS = ["construct", "review-and-revise"] as const; +export type Job = (typeof JOBS)[number]; + +/** Guidance keys, in the order they render. Each works through one mechanism. */ +export const GUIDANCE_KEYS = [ + "lenses", + "techniques", + "movements", + "licenses", + "motifs", + "smells", + "rabbit_holes", + "failure_modes", +] as const; +export type GuidanceKey = (typeof GUIDANCE_KEYS)[number]; + +/** The two movements a `movements` cell distinguishes. */ +export const MOVEMENTS = ["slice", "sweep"] as const; +export type Movement = (typeof MOVEMENTS)[number]; + +/** Runbook keys — the only keys that carry procedure — in the order they render. */ +export const RUNBOOK_KEYS = ["kickoff", "trajectory", "close"] as const; +export type RunbookKey = (typeof RUNBOOK_KEYS)[number]; + +/** + * How a guidance key works on the interviewer (ADR-0007 decision 3): a license + * permits a move a cooperative model suppresses; a technique supplies a method + * the model does not reliably apply; attention points native ability at a + * target; an anchor holds leading words for judgment. + */ +export type MechanismType = "license" | "technique" | "attention" | "anchor"; + +export interface KeyDescription { + readonly key: GuidanceKey | RunbookKey; + readonly title: string; + readonly mechanism: MechanismType | "procedure"; + /** What the harness defines the key to mean — rendered above every key. */ + readonly definition: string; +} + +export const GUIDANCE_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS: Readonly< + Record +> = { + lenses: { + key: "lenses", + title: "Lenses", + mechanism: "attention", + definition: + "What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.", + }, + techniques: { + key: "techniques", + title: "Techniques", + mechanism: "technique", + definition: + "Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.", + }, + movements: { + key: "movements", + title: "Movements", + mechanism: "technique", + definition: + "The two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.", + }, + licenses: { + key: "licenses", + title: "Licenses", + mechanism: "license", + definition: + "Moves the interviewer is permitted to make that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. A license says what is allowed and the limit of the allowance; it never obliges.", + }, + motifs: { + key: "motifs", + title: "Motifs", + mechanism: "attention", + definition: + "Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.", + }, + smells: { + key: "smells", + title: "Smells", + mechanism: "attention", + definition: + "Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.", + }, + rabbit_holes: { + key: "rabbit_holes", + title: "Rabbit holes", + mechanism: "anchor", + definition: + "Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.", + }, + failure_modes: { + key: "failure_modes", + title: "Failure modes", + mechanism: "anchor", + definition: + "Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.", + }, +}; + +export const RUNBOOK_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS: Readonly< + Record +> = { + kickoff: { + key: "kickoff", + title: "Kickoff", + mechanism: "procedure", + definition: + "What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions.", + }, + trajectory: { + key: "trajectory", + title: "Trajectory", + mechanism: "procedure", + definition: + "Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies.", + }, + close: { + key: "close", + title: "Close", + mechanism: "procedure", + definition: + "How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not.", + }, +}; + +export const JOB_TITLES: Readonly> = { + construct: "Job: construct — no model exists", + "review-and-revise": "Job: review and revise — a model exists", +}; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin-definition.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin-definition.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..dcd26555a53 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin-definition.ts @@ -0,0 +1,484 @@ +/** + * The plugin definition: `plugin.yaml` read under the harness-owned keys + * (ADR-0007 decision 8). + * + * A plugin is data under fixed keys in four groups — contract (`ontology`, + * `schema`, `patterns`), guidance, runbooks, machinery — plus an identity block. + * The schema here is the contract: an unknown key anywhere is rejected, so a + * plugin can specialise every key and add none. The cross-checks below are the + * facts a schema cannot state — that every row names a declared kind, that the + * anchor is a row, that runbooks belong to declared jobs. + * + * `schema/plugin.schema.json` is derived from `PluginDefinitionSchema` and + * published for editors; a test keeps the two identical. + */ + +import * as v from "valibot"; +import { parse as parseYaml } from "yaml"; + +import { + GUIDANCE_KEYS, + JOBS, + MOVEMENTS, + RUNBOOK_KEYS, + type GuidanceKey, + type Job, + type Movement, + type RunbookKey, +} from "./keys"; + +/** Precision words, in ladder order except `spelled out`, which is its own ladder. */ +export const PRECISION_WORDS = [ + "named", + "number", + "range", + "spread", + "spelled out", +] as const; +export type PrecisionWord = (typeof PRECISION_WORDS)[number]; + +/** What a row demands: a precision word, or a count of nodes present. */ +export type PrecisionDemand = + | { readonly kind: "word"; readonly word: PrecisionWord } + | { readonly kind: "at-least"; readonly count: number }; + +/** What each precision word means; harness vocabulary, rendered for every plugin. */ +export const PRECISION_LADDER: Readonly< + Record +> = { + named: "identified in words", + number: "a single figure with its unit", + range: "an ordinary low and high", + spread: + 'range plus "typical", plus one-in-ten worse and one-in-ten better (or median and quartiles)', + "spelled out": + "the rule, pattern, list, or structure itself, in a form a second reader could apply without asking", + "at least N": "a count of nodes present", +}; + +export interface KindRow { + readonly kind: string; + readonly description: string; + readonly projectsTo: string; +} + +export interface MustKnowRow { + readonly kind: string; + readonly slot: string; + readonly precision: PrecisionDemand; + readonly notApplicableAllowed: boolean; + readonly why: string; +} + +export interface FloorRow { + readonly kind: string; + readonly atLeast: number; +} + +export interface PatternRow { + readonly id: string; + readonly when: string; + readonly ask: string; + /** The kinds whose nodes can trigger it; empty means any node. */ + readonly kinds: readonly string[]; +} + +/** The completion anchor, declared: the kind whose dependency slot is the slice. */ +export interface Anchor { + readonly kind: string; + readonly dependencySlot: string; +} + +/** One entry in a guidance or runbook cell. */ +export interface GuidanceItem { + readonly name: string; + readonly text: string; + /** For failure modes: how the failure is detected. */ + readonly signature?: string; + /** Where the entry comes from; required of the repertoire, optional for a plugin. */ + readonly source?: string; +} + +export interface MovementCells { + readonly slice: readonly GuidanceItem[]; + readonly sweep: readonly GuidanceItem[]; +} + +export type GuidanceCells = { + readonly [K in Exclude]: readonly GuidanceItem[]; +} & { readonly movements: MovementCells }; + +export type RunbookCells = { + readonly [K in RunbookKey]: readonly GuidanceItem[]; +}; + +export interface NamedText { + readonly name: string; + readonly text: string; +} + +export interface AttributeNote extends NamedText { + readonly on: string; + readonly values?: readonly string[]; +} + +export interface ProposalDeclaration { + readonly type: string; + readonly payload: string; +} + +/** The read model of one `plugin.yaml`. */ +export interface PluginDefinition { + readonly version: string; + readonly identity: { + readonly id: string; + readonly formalism: string; + readonly jobs: readonly Job[]; + readonly purpose: string; + }; + readonly kinds: readonly KindRow[]; + readonly ontology: { + readonly preamble?: string; + readonly notKinds: readonly NamedText[]; + readonly attributes: readonly AttributeNote[]; + }; + readonly anchor: Anchor; + readonly floor: readonly FloorRow[]; + readonly mustKnow: readonly MustKnowRow[]; + readonly proposals: readonly ProposalDeclaration[]; + readonly schemaPreamble?: string; + readonly patterns: readonly PatternRow[]; + readonly patternsPreamble?: string; + readonly guidance: GuidanceCells; + readonly runbooks: Partial>; + readonly machinery: { + readonly checks: readonly string[]; + readonly tools: readonly string[]; + }; +} + +export class PluginDefinitionError extends Error { + constructor(message: string) { + super(message); + this.name = "PluginDefinitionError"; + } +} + +// ── The schema ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── + +const text = v.pipe(v.string(), v.nonEmpty()); +const identifier = v.pipe(v.string(), v.regex(/^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*$/u)); +const version = v.pipe( + v.string(), + v.regex( + /^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*\/\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}\.\d+$/u, + "expected `/.`", + ), +); +const precision = v.union([ + v.picklist(PRECISION_WORDS), + v.pipe(v.string(), v.regex(/^at least [1-9]\d*$/u)), +]); + +export const GuidanceItemSchema = v.strictObject({ + name: text, + text, + signature: v.optional(text), + source: v.optional(text), +}); +const items = v.array(GuidanceItemSchema); + +export const GuidanceCellsSchema = v.strictObject({ + lenses: items, + techniques: items, + movements: v.strictObject({ slice: items, sweep: items }), + licenses: items, + motifs: items, + smells: items, + rabbit_holes: items, + failure_modes: items, +}); + +export const RunbookCellsSchema = v.strictObject({ + kickoff: items, + trajectory: items, + close: items, +}); + +const namedText = v.strictObject({ name: text, text }); + +export const PluginDefinitionSchema = v.strictObject({ + plugin: v.strictObject({ + id: identifier, + version, + formalism: text, + jobs: v.pipe(v.array(v.picklist(JOBS)), v.minLength(1)), + purpose: text, + }), + ontology: v.strictObject({ + preamble: v.optional(text), + kinds: v.pipe( + v.array(v.strictObject({ kind: text, is: text, projects_to: text })), + v.minLength(1), + ), + not_kinds: v.optional(v.array(namedText)), + attributes: v.optional( + v.array( + v.strictObject({ + name: text, + on: text, + values: v.optional(v.array(text)), + text, + }), + ), + ), + }), + schema: v.strictObject({ + preamble: v.optional(text), + anchor: v.strictObject({ kind: text, depends_on: text }), + floor: v.array( + v.strictObject({ + kind: text, + at_least: v.pipe(v.number(), v.integer(), v.minValue(1)), + }), + ), + must_know: v.pipe( + v.array( + v.strictObject({ + kind: text, + slot: text, + precision, + not_applicable: v.boolean(), + why: text, + }), + ), + v.minLength(1), + ), + proposals: v.pipe( + v.array(v.strictObject({ type: identifier, payload: identifier })), + v.minLength(1), + ), + }), + patterns: v.strictObject({ + preamble: v.optional(text), + items: v.array( + v.strictObject({ + id: v.pipe(v.string(), v.regex(/^P\d{2}$/u)), + on: v.array(text), + when: text, + ask: text, + }), + ), + }), + guidance: GuidanceCellsSchema, + runbooks: v.strictObject({ + construct: v.optional(RunbookCellsSchema), + "review-and-revise": v.optional(RunbookCellsSchema), + }), + machinery: v.strictObject({ + checks: v.array(identifier), + tools: v.array(identifier), + }), +}); + +export type PluginDefinitionInput = v.InferInput; + +// ── The reader ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── + +const parsePrecision = (word: string): PrecisionDemand => { + const atLeast = /^at least (\d+)$/u.exec(word); + if (atLeast?.[1] !== undefined) { + return { kind: "at-least", count: Number(atLeast[1]) }; + } + return { kind: "word", word: word as PrecisionWord }; +}; + +const fail = (message: string): never => { + throw new PluginDefinitionError(message); +}; + +const formatIssues = (issues: readonly v.BaseIssue[]): string => + issues + .map((issue) => { + const path = (issue.path ?? []) + .map((segment) => String(segment.key)) + .join("."); + return `${path || ""}: ${issue.message}`; + }) + .join("; "); + +/** Parse and validate a YAML document as an object of the given schema. */ +export const readYamlAs = ( + schema: T, + yamlText: string, + what: string, +): v.InferOutput => { + let document: unknown; + try { + document = parseYaml(yamlText); + } catch (error) { + return fail(`${what} is not valid YAML: ${String(error)}`); + } + const result = v.safeParse(schema, document); + if (!result.success) { + return fail( + `${what} does not match its schema — ${formatIssues(result.issues)}`, + ); + } + return result.output; +}; + +/** + * Read one `plugin.yaml`. Fails loudly, at load, on a schema violation or a + * cross-reference the schema cannot express. + */ +export function readPluginDefinition(yamlText: string): PluginDefinition { + const input = readYamlAs( + PluginDefinitionSchema, + yamlText, + "the plugin definition", + ); + + const kindNames = input.ontology.kinds.map((row) => row.kind); + const kinds = new Set(kindNames); + if (kinds.size !== kindNames.length) { + fail("`ontology.kinds` repeats a kind"); + } + const knownKind = (kind: string, where: string): void => { + if (!kinds.has(kind)) { + fail( + `${where} names kind \`${kind}\`, which is not in \`ontology.kinds\``, + ); + } + }; + + const mustKnow: MustKnowRow[] = input.schema.must_know.map((row) => { + knownKind(row.kind, "`schema.must_know`"); + return { + kind: row.kind, + slot: row.slot, + precision: parsePrecision(row.precision), + notApplicableAllowed: row.not_applicable, + why: row.why, + }; + }); + for (const kind of kindNames) { + if (!mustKnow.some((row) => row.kind === kind)) { + fail(`\`schema.must_know\` has no row for kind \`${kind}\``); + } + } + + const floor: FloorRow[] = input.schema.floor.map((row) => { + knownKind(row.kind, "`schema.floor`"); + return { kind: row.kind, atLeast: row.at_least }; + }); + if (new Set(floor.map((row) => row.kind)).size !== floor.length) { + fail("`schema.floor` repeats a kind"); + } + + const { anchor } = input.schema; + knownKind(anchor.kind, "`schema.anchor`"); + const anchorRow = mustKnow.find( + (row) => row.kind === anchor.kind && row.slot === anchor.depends_on, + ); + if (anchorRow === undefined) { + fail( + `\`schema.anchor\` names slot \`${anchor.depends_on}\` on \`${anchor.kind}\`, which is not a \`must_know\` row`, + ); + } else if (anchorRow.precision.kind !== "at-least") { + fail("the anchor's dependency slot must demand `at least N`"); + } + + const patternIds = input.patterns.items.map((row) => row.id); + if (new Set(patternIds).size !== patternIds.length) { + fail("`patterns.items` repeats an id"); + } + const patterns: PatternRow[] = input.patterns.items.map((row) => { + for (const kind of row.on) knownKind(kind, `pattern ${row.id}`); + return { id: row.id, when: row.when, ask: row.ask, kinds: row.on }; + }); + + const jobs = input.plugin.jobs; + if (new Set(jobs).size !== jobs.length) fail("`plugin.jobs` repeats a job"); + const runbooks: Partial> = {}; + for (const job of JOBS) { + const cells = input.runbooks[job]; + if (cells === undefined) continue; + if (!jobs.includes(job)) { + fail( + `\`runbooks.${job}\` is present but \`plugin.jobs\` does not declare it`, + ); + } + runbooks[job] = cells; + } + + return { + version: input.plugin.version, + identity: { + id: input.plugin.id, + formalism: input.plugin.formalism, + jobs, + purpose: input.plugin.purpose, + }, + kinds: input.ontology.kinds.map((row) => ({ + kind: row.kind, + description: row.is, + projectsTo: row.projects_to, + })), + ontology: { + ...(input.ontology.preamble === undefined + ? {} + : { preamble: input.ontology.preamble }), + notKinds: input.ontology.not_kinds ?? [], + attributes: input.ontology.attributes ?? [], + }, + anchor: { kind: anchor.kind, dependencySlot: anchor.depends_on }, + floor, + mustKnow, + proposals: input.schema.proposals, + ...(input.schema.preamble === undefined + ? {} + : { schemaPreamble: input.schema.preamble }), + patterns, + ...(input.patterns.preamble === undefined + ? {} + : { patternsPreamble: input.patterns.preamble }), + guidance: input.guidance, + runbooks, + machinery: input.machinery, + }; +} + +export const mustKnowRowsFor = ( + definition: PluginDefinition, + kind: string, +): readonly MustKnowRow[] => + definition.mustKnow.filter((row) => row.kind === kind); + +/** Every guidance cell of a definition, flattened with its key path — for gates. */ +export const guidanceEntries = ( + cells: GuidanceCells, +): readonly { readonly path: string; readonly item: GuidanceItem }[] => + GUIDANCE_KEYS.flatMap((key) => + key === "movements" + ? MOVEMENTS.flatMap((movement: Movement) => + cells.movements[movement].map((item) => ({ + path: `movements.${movement}`, + item, + })), + ) + : cells[key].map((item) => ({ path: key, item })), + ); + +/** Every runbook cell of one job, flattened with its key path — for gates. */ +export const runbookEntries = ( + runbooks: Partial>, +): readonly { readonly path: string; readonly item: GuidanceItem }[] => + JOBS.flatMap((job) => { + const cells = runbooks[job]; + return cells === undefined + ? [] + : RUNBOOK_KEYS.flatMap((key) => + cells[key].map((item) => ({ path: `${job}.${key}`, item })), + ); + }); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin-file.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin-file.ts deleted file mode 100644 index 81d528eb394..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin-file.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,375 +0,0 @@ -/** - * The plugin file — one sectioned Markdown document per target formalism - * (ADR-0006; `docs/specs/plugin-contract.md`). - * - * The harness reads three tables by machine: `## Kinds` is the closed node-kind - * catalog, `## Must know` is the demand list (one row per kind and slot, plus - * the static floor stated in prose beneath it), and `## Patterns` is the - * kind-indexed pattern index. Every section's prose, including the sections - * around those tables, is kept verbatim so the binding can hand it to the - * interviewer as instructions. The parser is strict: a missing, renamed, or - * reordered contract heading, an unknown column, an unknown precision word, or - * a demand row for a kind the catalog lacks makes the file fail to load rather - * than load with a hole. - * - * Nothing here knows a domain or a formalism. The SDCPN file is the exemplar - * the column and value vocabularies were fixed against; a second file that - * needs a new heading is a finding for ADR-0006, not a parser feature. - */ - -export const PLUGIN_FILE_HEADINGS = [ - "Purpose", - "Kinds", - "Must know", - "Patterns", - "Moves", - "Deliverable", -] as const; - -export type PluginFileHeading = (typeof PLUGIN_FILE_HEADINGS)[number]; - -/** Precision words a value can carry. `at least N` is a count, not a word. */ -export const PRECISION_WORDS = [ - "named", - "number", - "range", - "spread", - "spelled out", -] as const; - -export type PrecisionWord = (typeof PRECISION_WORDS)[number]; - -export type PrecisionDemand = - | { readonly kind: "word"; readonly word: PrecisionWord } - | { readonly kind: "at-least"; readonly count: number }; - -export interface KindRow { - readonly kind: string; - readonly description: string; - readonly projectsTo: string; -} - -export interface MustKnowRow { - readonly kind: string; - readonly slot: string; - readonly precision: PrecisionDemand; - readonly notApplicableAllowed: boolean; - readonly why: string; -} - -export interface FloorRow { - readonly kind: string; - readonly atLeast: number; -} - -export interface PatternRow { - readonly id: string; - readonly when: string; - readonly ask: string; - /** Kinds named in `when`; the mechanical half of the trigger. */ - readonly kinds: readonly string[]; -} - -export interface PluginFile { - /** Immutable version string from the header, e.g. `sdcpn/2026-08-25.1`. */ - readonly version: string; - readonly kinds: readonly KindRow[]; - readonly mustKnow: readonly MustKnowRow[]; - readonly floor: readonly FloorRow[]; - readonly patterns: readonly PatternRow[]; - /** Each section's Markdown body, heading line excluded, in contract order. */ - readonly sections: Readonly>; -} - -export class PluginFileError extends Error { - constructor(message: string) { - super(message); - this.name = "PluginFileError"; - } -} - -const KINDS_COLUMNS = ["#", "kind", "what it is", "projects to"] as const; -const MUST_KNOW_COLUMNS = [ - "kind", - "slot", - "precision", - '"not applicable" allowed', - "why the model needs it", -] as const; -const PATTERNS_COLUMNS = ["id", "when", "ask"] as const; - -const NUMBER_WORDS: Readonly> = { - one: 1, - two: 2, - three: 3, - four: 4, - five: 5, - six: 6, - seven: 7, - eight: 8, - nine: 9, - ten: 10, -}; - -const stripCode = (cell: string): string => cell.replace(/^`(.*)`$/u, "$1"); - -interface Table { - readonly header: readonly string[]; - readonly rows: readonly (readonly string[])[]; -} - -/** - * The first GFM table in a block of Markdown: a header line, a separator line, - * then body rows, all starting with `|`. Cells split on bare `|`, which is exact - * for the exemplar and would need revisiting only for an escaped `\|`. - */ -const firstTable = (markdown: string, where: string): Table => { - const lines = markdown.split("\n"); - const start = lines.findIndex((line) => line.trimStart().startsWith("|")); - if (start === -1) { - throw new PluginFileError(`\`## ${where}\` has no table.`); - } - const tableLines: string[] = []; - for (const line of lines.slice(start)) { - if (!line.trimStart().startsWith("|")) break; - tableLines.push(line.trim()); - } - const [headerLine, separator, ...bodyLines] = tableLines; - if ( - headerLine === undefined || - separator === undefined || - !/^\|(?:\s*:?-+:?\s*\|)+$/u.test(separator) - ) { - throw new PluginFileError( - `\`## ${where}\`: the first table lacks a header and separator row.`, - ); - } - const splitCells = (line: string): string[] => - line - .replace(/^\|/u, "") - .replace(/\|$/u, "") - .split("|") - .map((cell) => cell.trim()); - const header = splitCells(headerLine); - const rows = bodyLines.map((line, index) => { - const cells = splitCells(line); - if (cells.length !== header.length) { - throw new PluginFileError( - `\`## ${where}\` row ${index + 1} has ${cells.length} cells; the header has ${header.length}.`, - ); - } - return cells; - }); - return { header, rows }; -}; - -const expectColumns = ( - table: Table, - expected: readonly string[], - where: string, -): void => { - if ( - table.header.length !== expected.length || - table.header.some((column, index) => column !== expected[index]) - ) { - throw new PluginFileError( - `\`## ${where}\` columns must be exactly [${expected.join(", ")}]; found [${table.header.join(", ")}].`, - ); - } -}; - -const parsePrecision = (cell: string, where: string): PrecisionDemand => { - const atLeast = /^at least (\d+)$/u.exec(cell); - if (atLeast) { - return { kind: "at-least", count: Number(atLeast[1]) }; - } - const word = PRECISION_WORDS.find((candidate) => candidate === cell); - if (word === undefined) { - throw new PluginFileError( - `${where}: precision \`${cell}\` is not one of ${PRECISION_WORDS.map((candidate) => `\`${candidate}\``).join(", ")} or \`at least N\`.`, - ); - } - return { kind: "word", word }; -}; - -const parseYesNo = (cell: string, where: string): boolean => { - if (cell === "yes") return true; - if (cell === "no") return false; - throw new PluginFileError( - `${where}: expected \`yes\` or \`no\`, found \`${cell}\`.`, - ); -}; - -const parseSections = ( - markdown: string, -): { header: string; sections: Record } => { - const lines = markdown.split("\n"); - const headings: Array<{ title: string; line: number }> = []; - let inFence = false; - for (const [index, line] of lines.entries()) { - if (line.startsWith("```")) inFence = !inFence; - if (inFence) continue; - const match = /^## (.+?)\s*$/u.exec(line); - if (match) headings.push({ title: match[1]!, line: index }); - } - const found = headings.map((heading) => heading.title); - if ( - found.length !== PLUGIN_FILE_HEADINGS.length || - found.some((title, index) => title !== PLUGIN_FILE_HEADINGS[index]) - ) { - throw new PluginFileError( - `Contract headings must be exactly [${PLUGIN_FILE_HEADINGS.join(" · ")}] in that order; found [${found.join(" · ")}].`, - ); - } - const header = lines.slice(0, headings[0]!.line).join("\n"); - const sections = Object.fromEntries( - headings.map((heading, index) => { - const end = headings[index + 1]?.line ?? lines.length; - return [ - heading.title, - lines - .slice(heading.line + 1, end) - .join("\n") - .trim(), - ]; - }), - ) as Record; - return { header, sections }; -}; - -const parseFloor = ( - mustKnowSection: string, - kinds: ReadonlySet, -): FloorRow[] => { - const paragraph = mustKnowSection - .split(/\n\s*\n/u) - .find((block) => /^\s*Static floor\b/u.test(block)); - if (paragraph === undefined) { - throw new PluginFileError( - "`## Must know` must state the static floor in a paragraph beginning `Static floor`.", - ); - } - const floor: FloorRow[] = []; - for (const match of paragraph.matchAll( - /at least (one|two|three|four|five|six|seven|eight|nine|ten|\d+)\s+`([^`]+)`/gu, - )) { - const count = NUMBER_WORDS[match[1]!] ?? Number(match[1]); - const kind = match[2]!; - if (!kinds.has(kind)) { - throw new PluginFileError( - `Static floor names \`${kind}\`, which is not in \`## Kinds\`.`, - ); - } - floor.push({ kind, atLeast: count }); - } - if (floor.length === 0) { - throw new PluginFileError( - "Static floor names no kind; expected phrases like `at least one `objective``.", - ); - } - return floor; -}; - -/** Parse one plugin file. Throws `PluginFileError` when the contract is violated. */ -export function parsePluginFile(markdown: string): PluginFile { - const { header, sections } = parseSections(markdown); - - const version = /Version:\s*`([^`]+)`/u.exec(header)?.[1]; - if (version === undefined) { - throw new PluginFileError( - "The header must declare an immutable version as `Version: `/.``.", - ); - } - - const kindsTable = firstTable(sections.Kinds, "Kinds"); - expectColumns(kindsTable, KINDS_COLUMNS, "Kinds"); - const kinds: KindRow[] = kindsTable.rows.map((cells) => ({ - kind: stripCode(cells[1]!), - description: cells[2]!, - projectsTo: cells[3]!, - })); - const kindNames = new Set(); - for (const row of kinds) { - if (row.kind === "" || kindNames.has(row.kind)) { - throw new PluginFileError( - `\`## Kinds\` has an empty or repeated kind: \`${row.kind}\`.`, - ); - } - kindNames.add(row.kind); - } - - const mustKnowTable = firstTable(sections["Must know"], "Must know"); - expectColumns(mustKnowTable, MUST_KNOW_COLUMNS, "Must know"); - const slotKeys = new Set(); - const mustKnow: MustKnowRow[] = mustKnowTable.rows.map((cells, index) => { - const where = `\`## Must know\` row ${index + 1}`; - const kind = stripCode(cells[0]!); - const slot = cells[1]!; - if (!kindNames.has(kind)) { - throw new PluginFileError( - `${where} names \`${kind}\`, which is not in \`## Kinds\`.`, - ); - } - if (slot === "") { - throw new PluginFileError(`${where} has an empty slot.`); - } - const key = `${kind}${slot}`; - if (slotKeys.has(key)) { - throw new PluginFileError( - `${where} repeats the slot \`${slot}\` on \`${kind}\`.`, - ); - } - slotKeys.add(key); - return { - kind, - slot, - precision: parsePrecision(cells[2]!, where), - notApplicableAllowed: parseYesNo(cells[3]!, where), - why: cells[4]!, - }; - }); - for (const kind of kindNames) { - if (!mustKnow.some((row) => row.kind === kind)) { - throw new PluginFileError( - `\`## Must know\` has no row for kind \`${kind}\`; every kind needs at least one.`, - ); - } - } - - const floor = parseFloor(sections["Must know"], kindNames); - - const patternsTable = firstTable(sections.Patterns, "Patterns"); - expectColumns(patternsTable, PATTERNS_COLUMNS, "Patterns"); - const patternIds = new Set(); - const patterns: PatternRow[] = patternsTable.rows.map((cells, index) => { - const id = cells[0]!; - if (id === "" || patternIds.has(id)) { - throw new PluginFileError( - `\`## Patterns\` row ${index + 1} has an empty or repeated id: \`${id}\`.`, - ); - } - patternIds.add(id); - const when = cells[1]!; - const named = [...when.matchAll(/`([^`]+)`/gu)].map((match) => match[1]!); - return { - id, - when, - ask: cells[2]!, - kinds: [...new Set(named.filter((name) => kindNames.has(name)))], - }; - }); - - return { version, kinds, mustKnow, floor, patterns, sections }; -} - -/** Every section, in contract order, as one instruction document. */ -export const pluginFileInstructions = (file: PluginFile): string => - PLUGIN_FILE_HEADINGS.map( - (heading) => `## ${heading}\n\n${file.sections[heading]}`, - ).join("\n\n"); - -/** The demand rows for one kind, in file order. */ -export const mustKnowRowsFor = ( - file: PluginFile, - kind: string, -): readonly MustKnowRow[] => file.mustKnow.filter((row) => row.kind === kind); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin-json-schema.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin-json-schema.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..07fa3066796 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin-json-schema.ts @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +/** + * The JSON-schema view of the plugin contract, derived from the valibot schema + * so there is one source of truth. Kept out of the public export surface: it + * is for the snapshot test that emits `schema/plugin.schema.json`, not for plugins. + */ +import { toJsonSchema } from "@valibot/to-json-schema"; + +import { PluginDefinitionSchema } from "./plugin-definition"; + +export const pluginJsonSchema = (): Record => ({ + $id: "https://hash.ai/brunch-agent/plugin.schema.json", + title: "Brunch plugin definition", + description: + "A plugin is data under harness-owned keys (ADR-0007). Cross-references the schema cannot state — rows name declared kinds, the anchor is a row, runbooks belong to declared jobs — are checked by readPluginDefinition.", + ...toJsonSchema(PluginDefinitionSchema, { errorMode: "ignore" }), +}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin.ts index d258c003a89..fa973a6c8ba 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin.ts @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ import * as v from "valibot"; import type { CaptureInputProposal } from "./capture-store"; -import type { PluginFile } from "./plugin-file"; +import type { PluginDefinition } from "./plugin-definition"; /** * The plugin descriptor — identity only, at this stage. @@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ import type { PluginFile } from "./plugin-file"; * that a plugin declares which target formalism it defines, and does so through * Valibot like every other boundary in the system (spec §12.4). * - * ADR-0006 adds the plugin file: a per-formalism sectioned Markdown document - * whose three tables parameterise the harness's fold, completion, and cue. A - * plugin that carries one is a kind-and-slot plugin and proposes slot - * assertions; the tracer plugin still has none. + * ADR-0007 adds the plugin definition: `plugin.yaml` under the harness-owned + * keys, whose contract keys parameterise the harness's fold, completion, and + * cue and whose guidance and runbook cells specialise what the repertoire + * teaches. A plugin that carries one is a kind-and-slot plugin. */ export const PluginDescriptor = v.object({ /** Package-level identity, matching the `plugin-*` role prefix (spec §12.2). */ @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ export interface PluginProposalType { export type Plugin = v.InferOutput & { /** FE-1392's declared floor; FE-1393 grows the catalog and SDK around it. */ readonly proposalCatalog: readonly [PluginProposalType]; - /** The parsed plugin file (ADR-0006); absent for a plugin without one. */ - readonly file?: PluginFile; + /** The plugin definition (ADR-0007); absent only for a plugin without a model. */ + readonly definition?: PluginDefinition; }; /** @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ export function definePlugin(descriptor: Plugin): Plugin { return { ...identity, proposalCatalog: [{ ...proposal, name, description }], - ...(descriptor.file === undefined ? {} : { file: descriptor.file }), + ...(descriptor.definition === undefined + ? {} + : { definition: descriptor.definition }), }; } diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/repertoire.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/repertoire.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5c17828c6fc --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/repertoire.ts @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +/** + * The repertoire's shape: the harness's own filling of every guidance and + * runbook key (ADR-0007 decisions 3, 7, 8). + * + * The repertoire is shipped by `packages/repertoire`, which depends only on + * this package; this module is the type and the reader, so that the harness + * can define what a repertoire must be without importing one. Two rules the + * reader enforces that a plugin definition does not: every key is filled, and + * every entry names its source — admission is by evidence, not plausibility. + */ + +import * as v from "valibot"; + +import { GUIDANCE_KEYS, JOBS, MOVEMENTS, RUNBOOK_KEYS, type Job } from "./keys"; +import { + GuidanceCellsSchema, + PluginDefinitionError, + readYamlAs, + RunbookCellsSchema, + type GuidanceCells, + type RunbookCells, +} from "./plugin-definition"; + +export interface Repertoire { + readonly version: string; + readonly purpose: string; + readonly guidance: GuidanceCells; + readonly runbooks: Readonly>; +} + +export const RepertoireSchema = v.strictObject({ + repertoire: v.strictObject({ + version: v.pipe( + v.string(), + v.regex(/^repertoire\/\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}\.\d+$/u), + ), + purpose: v.pipe(v.string(), v.nonEmpty()), + }), + guidance: GuidanceCellsSchema, + runbooks: v.strictObject({ + construct: RunbookCellsSchema, + "review-and-revise": RunbookCellsSchema, + }), +}); + +const fail = (message: string): never => { + throw new PluginDefinitionError(message); +}; + +/** Read `repertoire.yaml`; every key filled, every entry sourced. */ +export function readRepertoire(yamlText: string): Repertoire { + const input = readYamlAs(RepertoireSchema, yamlText, "the repertoire"); + const requireFilled = ( + path: string, + entries: readonly { readonly source?: string; readonly name: string }[], + ): void => { + if (entries.length === 0) { + fail( + `the repertoire leaves \`${path}\` empty; the harness must teach every key`, + ); + } + for (const entry of entries) { + if (entry.source === undefined) { + fail(`repertoire entry \`${path}\` › "${entry.name}" names no source`); + } + } + }; + for (const key of GUIDANCE_KEYS) { + if (key === "movements") { + for (const movement of MOVEMENTS) { + requireFilled( + `movements.${movement}`, + input.guidance.movements[movement], + ); + } + } else { + requireFilled(key, input.guidance[key]); + } + } + for (const job of JOBS) { + for (const key of RUNBOOK_KEYS) { + requireFilled(`${job}.${key}`, input.runbooks[job][key]); + } + } + return { + version: input.repertoire.version, + purpose: input.repertoire.purpose, + guidance: input.guidance, + runbooks: input.runbooks, + }; +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/slot-assertion.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/slot-assertion.ts index 03abcad69bd..1c190e8579e 100644 Binary files a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/slot-assertion.ts and b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/slot-assertion.ts differ diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/baseline-runner.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/baseline-runner.test.ts index c010acfaa00..b7b4f1d40a6 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/baseline-runner.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/baseline-runner.test.ts @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ import { spawn } from "node:child_process"; -import { createHash } from "node:crypto"; import { existsSync } from "node:fs"; import { cp, @@ -9,7 +8,6 @@ import { readdir, rm, symlink, - utimes, writeFile, } from "node:fs/promises"; import { createServer } from "node:http"; @@ -20,11 +18,6 @@ import { pathToFileURL } from "node:url"; import * as v from "valibot"; import { afterEach, describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; -import { - CONDITION_3_DEMAND_CLAUSES, - CONDITION_3_INSTRUMENT_VERSION, - CONDITION_3_LOCKED_PATHS, -} from "../../../../evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-instrument"; import { CONTEXT_ROOT, contextRootPresent } from "./workspace"; import type { StubReply } from "./fixtures/baseline-anthropic-stub"; @@ -37,10 +30,6 @@ const BASELINE_CASE_DIR = join( CONTEXT_ROOT, "evaluations/cases/process-model-elicitation/baseline", ); -const BASELINE_EVIDENCE_DIR = join( - CONTEXT_ROOT, - "docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline", -); const STUB_MODULE = pathToFileURL( join(import.meta.dirname, "fixtures/baseline-anthropic-stub.ts"), ).href; @@ -53,7 +42,7 @@ interface BaselineCopy { } const BaselineCheckpoint = v.object({ - condition: v.picklist(["1", "2", "3"]), + condition: v.picklist(["1", "2", "4"]), stopReason: v.string(), calls: v.array(v.unknown()), interviewerMessages: v.array( @@ -61,79 +50,6 @@ const BaselineCheckpoint = v.object({ role: v.picklist(["user", "assistant"]), content: v.string(), truncated: v.optional(v.boolean()), - continuations: v.optional( - v.array( - v.object({ - content: v.string(), - truncated: v.boolean(), - recordedAt: v.string(), - }), - ), - ), - }), - ), - preregistration: v.optional( - v.object({ - sha256: v.string(), - verifiedBeforeRun: v.boolean(), - }), - ), - operatorProjections: v.optional( - v.array( - v.object({ - turn: v.number(), - activeObjectiveRows: v.array(v.string()), - unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors: v.array(v.unknown()), - selectedClauseId: v.nullable(v.string()), - selectedUnsupportedAnchorLabel: v.nullable(v.string()), - selectedCardId: v.nullable(v.string()), - selectedPredicate: v.nullable(v.string()), - activationMatches: v.array( - v.object({ - cardId: v.string(), - clauseId: v.string(), - predicate: v.string(), - }), - ), - noProgressStreak: v.number(), - noProgressAdvisory: v.boolean(), - }), - ), - ), - operatorAttempts: v.optional( - v.array( - v.object({ - turn: v.number(), - attempt: v.number(), - parseError: v.nullable(v.string()), - }), - ), - ), - impatienceProbeTurn: v.optional(v.number()), - genQ02Layer2: v.optional( - v.object({ - cardId: v.literal("GEN-Q02"), - verdict: v.literal("unobservable"), - reason: v.string(), - }), - ), - recovery: v.optional( - v.object({ - mode: v.picklist(["resume", "continue-final"]), - sourceRawPath: v.string(), - sourceSha256: v.string(), - seams: v.array( - v.object({ - kind: v.picklist([ - "truncated-expert-regeneration", - "truncated-interviewer-regeneration", - "final-continuation", - ]), - sourceHadTruncationMarker: v.literal(true), - sourceContent: v.string(), - recordedAt: v.string(), - }), - ), }), ), }); @@ -144,159 +60,6 @@ const BaselineRequest = v.object({ messages: v.array(v.record(v.string(), v.unknown())), }); -const FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE = [ - "The objective is to test scheduling decisions before committing the weekly plan.", - "We schedule customer orders on two coating lines.", - "Operators run coating batches.", - "Orders flow from release through line assignment to production and shipment.", - "A large order may be split into contiguous runs.", - "I do not know the ordinary minimum run range.", - "Both lines can run the same eligible coating family.", - "Split runs stay contiguous in the weekly sequence.", - "A split normally adds one or two extra changeovers.", - "Repeated ramp scrap is usually 20 to 40 units.", -].join(" "); - -const evidenceByClause = { - "SF-OBJ": FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE.split(". ")[0] + ".", - "SF-ENT": "We schedule customer orders on two coating lines.", - "SF-ACT": "Operators run coating batches.", - "SF-PATH": - "Orders flow from release through line assignment to production and shipment.", - "SF-FLOW": - "Orders flow from release through line assignment to production and shipment.", - "SP-BATCH": "A large order may be split into contiguous runs.", - "SP-MIN": "I do not know the ordinary minimum run range.", - "SP-ELIG": "Both lines can run the same eligible coating family.", - "SP-POL": "Split runs stay contiguous in the weekly sequence.", - "SP-CO": "A split normally adds one or two extra changeovers.", - "SP-SCRAP": "Repeated ramp scrap is usually 20 to 40 units.", -} as const; - -function condition3Projection( - options: { - minimumEvidence?: { turn: number; quote: string }; - minimumPass?: boolean; - } = {}, -) { - return { - activeObjectiveRows: ["ROW-SPLIT"], - activeObjectiveRowEvidence: [ - { - row: "ROW-SPLIT", - anchorLabel: "split-large-orders", - matchingPredicate: "split-run", - evidence: [ - { - turn: 1, - quote: "A large order may be split into contiguous runs.", - }, - ], - rationale: "The expert explicitly describes split orders.", - }, - ], - retractedObjectiveAnchors: [], - unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors: [], - assessments: CONDITION_3_DEMAND_CLAUSES.map((clause) => { - const demanded = clause.row === null || clause.row === "ROW-SPLIT"; - const isPresenceDemand = clause.demand.startsWith("presence count >="); - const isSelectedFailure = clause.id === "SP-MIN"; - const quote = - clause.id === "SP-MIN" && options.minimumEvidence - ? options.minimumEvidence - : clause.id in evidenceByClause - ? { - turn: 1, - quote: - evidenceByClause[clause.id as keyof typeof evidenceByClause], - } - : undefined; - return { - clauseId: clause.id, - demand: clause.demand, - demanded, - coordinate: clause.coordinate, - currentStatus: demanded ? "explicit" : "not-applicable", - currentGrade: demanded - ? isPresenceDemand - ? "none" - : isSelectedFailure && !options.minimumPass - ? "verbal" - : clause.id === "SP-MIN" || - clause.id === "SP-CO" || - clause.id === "SP-SCRAP" - ? "range" - : "structured" - : "not-applicable", - pass: demanded - ? !isSelectedFailure || options.minimumPass === true - : true, - failureDiagnostic: - isSelectedFailure && !options.minimumPass - ? "below-required-grade" - : null, - activationPredicates: - isSelectedFailure && !options.minimumPass - ? ["below-demanded-grade"] - : [], - evidence: demanded && quote ? [quote] : [], - observedCount: isPresenceDemand - ? clause.id === "SF-ENT" - ? 2 - : 1 - : null, - rationale: "operator-only test rationale", - }; - }), - notes: ["test projection"], - }; -} - -function condition3NoProgressProjection() { - return { - activeObjectiveRows: [], - activeObjectiveRowEvidence: [], - retractedObjectiveAnchors: [], - unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors: [], - assessments: CONDITION_3_DEMAND_CLAUSES.map((clause) => - clause.row === null - ? { - clauseId: clause.id, - demand: clause.demand, - coordinate: clause.coordinate, - demanded: true, - currentStatus: "none", - currentGrade: "none", - pass: false, - failureDiagnostic: clause.demand.startsWith("presence count >=") - ? "below-minimum-count" - : "unaddressed", - activationPredicates: [], - evidence: [], - observedCount: clause.demand.startsWith("presence count >=") - ? 0 - : null, - rationale: "No transcript evidence was added.", - } - : { - clauseId: clause.id, - demand: clause.demand, - coordinate: clause.coordinate, - demanded: false, - currentStatus: "not-applicable", - currentGrade: "not-applicable", - pass: true, - failureDiagnostic: null, - activationPredicates: [], - evidence: [], - observedCount: null, - rationale: "Inactive objective row.", - }, - ), - notes: [], - }; -} - async function copyDirectoryContents( sourceDirectory: string, destinationDirectory: string, @@ -310,6 +73,8 @@ async function copyDirectoryContents( ); } +// The runner resolves the case directory and its prompt files relative to its +// own location, so the copy mirrors the protocol and case paths under one root. async function createBaselineCopy(): Promise { const testDirectory = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "baseline-runner-test-")); temporaryDirectories.push(testDirectory); @@ -321,77 +86,18 @@ async function createBaselineCopy(): Promise { testDirectory, "evaluations/cases/process-model-elicitation/baseline", ); - const completionSpecDirectory = join(testDirectory, "docs/specs"); - const archivedSpecDirectory = join(testDirectory, "docs/archive/specs"); - const researchDirectory = join( - testDirectory, - "docs/reference/research/elicitation", - ); - const evidenceDirectory = join( - testDirectory, - "docs/evidence/evaluations/process-model-elicitation/baseline", - ); await Promise.all([ mkdir(protocolDirectory, { recursive: true }), mkdir(caseDirectory, { recursive: true }), - mkdir(completionSpecDirectory, { recursive: true }), - mkdir(archivedSpecDirectory, { recursive: true }), - mkdir(researchDirectory, { recursive: true }), - mkdir(evidenceDirectory, { recursive: true }), ]); await Promise.all([ copyDirectoryContents(BASELINE_PROTOCOL_DIR, protocolDirectory), copyDirectoryContents(BASELINE_CASE_DIR, caseDirectory), - copyDirectoryContents(BASELINE_EVIDENCE_DIR, evidenceDirectory), - cp( - join(CONTEXT_ROOT, "docs/specs/elicitation-completion.md"), - join(completionSpecDirectory, "elicitation-completion.md"), - ), - cp( - join( - CONTEXT_ROOT, - "docs/archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md", - ), - join(archivedSpecDirectory, "cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md"), - ), - cp( - join( - CONTEXT_ROOT, - "docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md", - ), - join(researchDirectory, "frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md"), - ), ]); await symlink( join(CONTEXT_ROOT, "../../../node_modules"), join(testDirectory, "node_modules"), ); - const sealedAt = new Date(); - const lockedFileTimestamp = new Date(sealedAt.getTime() - 1_000); - const files = await Promise.all( - CONDITION_3_LOCKED_PATHS.map(async (path) => { - const lockedFilePath = join(testDirectory, path); - await utimes(lockedFilePath, lockedFileTimestamp, lockedFileTimestamp); - return { - path, - sha256: createHash("sha256") - .update(await readFile(lockedFilePath, "utf8")) - .digest("hex"), - }; - }), - ); - await writeFile( - join(protocolDirectory, "condition-3-preregistration.lock.json"), - JSON.stringify( - { - version: CONDITION_3_INSTRUMENT_VERSION, - sealedAt: sealedAt.toISOString(), - files, - }, - null, - 2, - ), - ); return { outputDirectory: join(testDirectory, "test-output"), protocolDirectory, @@ -402,7 +108,7 @@ async function createBaselineCopy(): Promise { async function runBaseline( baselineCopy: BaselineCopy, replies: StubReply[], - condition: "1" | "2" | "3" = "1", + condition: "1" | "2" | "4" = "1", mode?: "--resume" | "--continue-final", ): Promise<{ checkpoint: v.InferOutput; @@ -447,17 +153,7 @@ async function runBaseline( BaselineCheckpoint, JSON.parse( await readFile( - join( - baselineCopy.outputDirectory, - (await readdir(baselineCopy.outputDirectory)) - .filter( - (name) => - name.startsWith(`condition-${condition}`) && - name.endsWith(".raw.json"), - ) - .sort() - .at(-1) ?? `condition-${condition}.raw.json`, - ), + join(baselineCopy.outputDirectory, `condition-${condition}.raw.json`), "utf8", ), ) as unknown, @@ -469,95 +165,6 @@ async function runBaseline( return { checkpoint, stderr, requests }; } -async function runBaselineFailure( - baselineCopy: BaselineCopy, - replies: StubReply[], - mode?: "--resume" | "--continue-final", -): Promise<{ - checkpoint?: v.InferOutput; - stderr: string; - requests: Array>; -}> { - const requestsPath = join(baselineCopy.testDirectory, "requests.jsonl"); - const repliesPath = join(baselineCopy.testDirectory, "replies.json"); - await writeFile(repliesPath, JSON.stringify(replies)); - const subprocess = spawn( - process.execPath, - [ - "--experimental-strip-types", - join(baselineCopy.protocolDirectory, "run.ts"), - "3", - ...(mode ? [mode] : []), - ], - { - cwd: baselineCopy.testDirectory, - env: { - ...process.env, - BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: STUB_MODULE, - BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR: baselineCopy.outputDirectory, - BASELINE_STUB_REPLIES_PATH: repliesPath, - BASELINE_STUB_REQUESTS_PATH: requestsPath, - }, - stdio: ["ignore", "ignore", "pipe"], - }, - ); - subprocess.stderr.setEncoding("utf8"); - let stderr = ""; - subprocess.stderr.on("data", (chunk: string) => { - stderr += chunk; - }); - const exitCode = await new Promise((resolve, reject) => { - subprocess.once("error", reject); - subprocess.once("close", resolve); - }); - expect(exitCode).toBe(1); - - const requests = existsSync(requestsPath) - ? (await readFile(requestsPath, "utf8")) - .trim() - .split("\n") - .filter(Boolean) - .map((line) => v.parse(BaselineRequest, JSON.parse(line) as unknown)) - : []; - const rawFiles = existsSync(baselineCopy.outputDirectory) - ? readdir(baselineCopy.outputDirectory) - : Promise.resolve([]); - const latestRawFile = (await rawFiles) - .filter((name) => name.endsWith(".raw.json")) - .sort() - .at(-1); - const checkpoint = latestRawFile - ? v.parse( - BaselineCheckpoint, - JSON.parse( - await readFile( - join(baselineCopy.outputDirectory, latestRawFile), - "utf8", - ), - ) as unknown, - ) - : undefined; - return { checkpoint, stderr, requests }; -} - -async function mutateCondition3Lock( - baselineCopy: BaselineCopy, - mutate: (lock: Condition3Lock) => Condition3Lock, -): Promise { - const lockPath = join( - baselineCopy.protocolDirectory, - "condition-3-preregistration.lock.json", - ); - const lock = JSON.parse(await readFile(lockPath, "utf8")) as Condition3Lock; - await writeFile(lockPath, JSON.stringify(mutate(lock), null, 2)); -} - -interface Condition3Lock { - version: string; - sealedAt: string; - files: Array<{ path: string; sha256: string }>; -} - afterEach(async () => { await Promise.all( temporaryDirectories @@ -566,1077 +173,214 @@ afterEach(async () => { ); }); -describe.skipIf(!contextRootPresent)( - "baseline runner completion metadata", - () => { - test("rejects an output override without the stub module before API calls or output", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - let apiCalls = 0; - const server = createServer((_request, response) => { - apiCalls += 1; - response.writeHead(500).end(); - }); - await new Promise((resolve) => { - server.listen(0, "127.0.0.1", resolve); - }); - const address = server.address(); - if (!address || typeof address === "string") { - throw new Error("Expected the test API server to listen on a TCP port"); - } - - const { BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: _stubModule, ...env } = - process.env; - const subprocess = spawn( - process.execPath, - [ - "--experimental-strip-types", - join(baselineCopy.protocolDirectory, "run.ts"), - "1", - ], - { - cwd: baselineCopy.testDirectory, - env: { - ...env, - ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL: `http://127.0.0.1:${address.port}`, - BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR: baselineCopy.outputDirectory, - }, - stdio: ["ignore", "ignore", "pipe"], - }, - ); - subprocess.stderr.setEncoding("utf8"); - let stderr = ""; - subprocess.stderr.on("data", (chunk: string) => { - stderr += chunk; - }); - const exitCode = await new Promise((resolve, reject) => { - subprocess.once("error", reject); - subprocess.once("close", resolve); - }); - await new Promise((resolve, reject) => { - server.close((error) => (error ? reject(error) : resolve())); - }); - - expect(exitCode).toBe(1); - expect(stderr).toContain( - "BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR requires BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE", - ); - expect(apiCalls).toBe(0); - expect(existsSync(baselineCopy.outputDirectory)).toBe(false); - }); - - test("checkpoints a truncated expert reply and stops before another interviewer call", async () => { - const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); - const result = await runBaseline(testDirectory, [ - { text: "What happens next?" }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: "The operator begins to explain", truncated: true }, - ]); - - expect(result.checkpoint.calls).toHaveLength(3); - expect(result.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("expert-truncated"); - expect(result.checkpoint.interviewerMessages.at(-1)).toEqual({ - role: "user", - content: "The operator begins to explain", - truncated: true, - }); - expect(result.stderr).toContain("expert reply is truncated"); - }); - - test("preserves the condition 2 prompt and legacy completion path", async () => { - const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); - const result = await runBaseline( - testDirectory, - [{ text: "Final structured model" }, { text: "YES" }], - "2", - ); - - expect(result.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("delivered"); - expect(result.requests[0]?.system).toContain( - "You are an expert process-model elicitor", - ); - expect(result.requests[0]?.system).not.toContain( - "test-only completion operator", - ); - }); - - test("resume regenerates a trailing truncated expert reply before continuing", async () => { - const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); - await runBaseline(testDirectory, [ - { text: "What happens next?" }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: "Partial expert reply", truncated: true }, - ]); - - const resumed = await runBaseline( - testDirectory, - [ - { text: "Complete expert reply" }, - { text: "Final model" }, - { text: "YES" }, - ], - "1", - "--resume", - ); - - expect(resumed.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("delivered"); - expect(resumed.checkpoint.interviewerMessages).toEqual([ - expect.objectContaining({ role: "user" }), - { role: "assistant", content: "What happens next?" }, - { role: "user", content: "Complete expert reply" }, - { role: "assistant", content: "Final model" }, - ]); - expect(resumed.stderr).toContain("regenerating truncated expert reply"); - }); - - test("checkpoints a capped non-final interviewer reply and stops before calling the expert", async () => { - const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); - const result = await runBaseline(testDirectory, [ - { text: "part-1", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-2", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-3", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-4", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-5", truncated: true }, - { text: "NO" }, - ]); - - expect(result.checkpoint.calls).toHaveLength(6); - expect(result.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("interviewer-truncated"); - expect(result.checkpoint.interviewerMessages.at(-1)).toEqual({ - role: "assistant", - content: "part-1part-2part-3part-4part-5", - truncated: true, - }); - expect(result.stderr).toContain( - "non-final interviewer reply is truncated", - ); - }); - - test("continues a truncated final delivery without sending checkpoint metadata", async () => { - const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); - await runBaseline(testDirectory, [ - { text: "part-1", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-2", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-3", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-4", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-5", truncated: true }, - { text: "YES" }, - ]); - await rm(join(testDirectory.testDirectory, "requests.jsonl")); - - const continued = await runBaseline( - testDirectory, - [{ text: " continued" }], - "1", - "--continue-final", - ); - - expect(continued.requests).toHaveLength(1); - expect(continued.requests[0]?.messages).toEqual([ - expect.objectContaining({ role: "user" }), - { role: "assistant", content: "part-1part-2part-3part-4part-5" }, - { - role: "user", - content: - "You were cut off mid-document. Continue exactly from where you stopped — no preamble, no repetition.", - }, - ]); - for (const message of continued.requests[0]?.messages ?? []) { - expect(Object.keys(message).sort()).toEqual(["content", "role"]); - } - expect(continued.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("delivered"); - expect(continued.checkpoint.interviewerMessages.at(-1)).toEqual({ - role: "assistant", - content: "part-1part-2part-3part-4part-5 continued", - }); - }); - - test("runs condition 3 with a preregistered operator projection", async () => { - const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); - const result = await runBaseline( - testDirectory, - [ - { text: "What decision should the model support?" }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE }, - { text: JSON.stringify(condition3Projection()) }, - { text: "What ordinary minimum run range applies?" }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: "Usually 800 to 1,200 units." }, - { - text: JSON.stringify( - condition3Projection({ - minimumEvidence: { - turn: 2, - quote: "Usually 800 to 1,200 units.", - }, - minimumPass: true, - }), - ), - }, - { text: "Final model" }, - { text: "YES" }, - ], - "3", - ); - - expect(result.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("delivered"); - expect(result.checkpoint).toMatchObject({ - condition: "3", - preregistration: { - verifiedBeforeRun: true, - }, - operatorProjections: [ - expect.objectContaining({ - turn: 1, - activeObjectiveRows: ["ROW-SPLIT"], - selectedClauseId: "SP-MIN", - selectedCardId: "CPS-Q03", - selectedPredicate: "below-demanded-grade", - }), - expect.objectContaining({ turn: 2 }), - ], - }); - expect(result.checkpoint.preregistration?.sha256).toMatch( - /^[a-f0-9]{64}$/u, - ); - - const firstInterviewer = result.requests[0]; - const firstExpert = result.requests[2]; - const firstOperator = result.requests[3]; - const secondInterviewer = result.requests[4]; - const secondExpert = result.requests[6]; - - expect(firstInterviewer?.system).toContain( - "This is a single-session experiment", - ); - expect(firstInterviewer?.system).not.toContain("Marta Iversen"); - expect(firstExpert?.system).toContain("Marta Iversen"); - expect(firstExpert?.system).not.toContain("FROZEN_DEMAND_TABLE"); - expect(firstOperator?.system).toContain("FROZEN_DEMAND_TABLE"); - expect(firstOperator?.system).toContain("PROJECTION_ENVELOPE"); - expect(firstOperator?.system).toContain('"assessmentStates"'); - expect(firstOperator?.system).toContain('"matchingPredicate"'); - expect(firstOperator?.system).toContain('"split-run"'); - expect(firstOperator?.system).toContain('"failureDiagnostic"'); - expect(firstOperator?.system).toContain('"absence-uncorroborated"'); - expect(firstOperator?.system).not.toContain("Marta Iversen"); - expect(JSON.stringify(firstOperator?.messages)).toContain( - "Repeated ramp scrap is usually 20 to 40 units.", - ); - expect(JSON.stringify(secondInterviewer?.messages)).toContain( - "", - ); - expect(JSON.stringify(secondInterviewer?.messages)).not.toContain( - "operator-only test rationale", - ); - expect(JSON.stringify(secondExpert?.messages)).not.toContain( - "test-only-completion-diagnostic", - ); - expect(JSON.stringify(result.requests[7]?.messages)).toContain( - "floor huddle in ten minutes", - ); - expect(result.checkpoint.impatienceProbeTurn).toBe(2); - expect(result.checkpoint.genQ02Layer2).toMatchObject({ - cardId: "GEN-Q02", - verdict: "unobservable", - }); - expect( - result.checkpoint.operatorProjections?.flatMap( - ({ activationMatches }) => activationMatches, - ), - ).not.toContainEqual(expect.objectContaining({ cardId: "GEN-Q02" })); - }); - - test("selects a transcript-supported unsupported active objective before frozen rows", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - const unsupportedProjection = { - ...condition3Projection(), - assessments: condition3Projection().assessments.map((assessment) => - assessment.clauseId === "SF-OBJ" - ? { - ...assessment, - observedCount: 2, - evidence: [ - ...assessment.evidence, - { turn: 1, quote: "minimize energy use" }, - ], - } - : assessment, - ), - unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors: [ - { - label: "energy-use", - state: "active", - demanded: true, - pass: false, - failureDiagnostic: "unsupported-active-anchor", - evidence: [ - { - turn: 1, - quote: "minimize energy use", - }, - ], - resolutionEvidence: [], - resolutionRationale: null, - rationale: - "The frozen objective rows do not represent this objective.", - }, - ], - }; - const result = await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { text: "Describe the operation." }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: `${FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE} We also minimize energy use.` }, - { text: JSON.stringify(unsupportedProjection) }, - { text: "What frozen demand is still open?" }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: "The ordinary minimum is still unknown." }, - { - text: JSON.stringify({ - ...condition3Projection({ - minimumEvidence: { - turn: 2, - quote: "The ordinary minimum is still unknown.", - }, - }), - assessments: condition3Projection({ - minimumEvidence: { - turn: 2, - quote: "The ordinary minimum is still unknown.", - }, - }).assessments.map((assessment) => - assessment.clauseId === "SF-OBJ" - ? { - ...assessment, - observedCount: 2, - evidence: [ - ...assessment.evidence, - { turn: 1, quote: "minimize energy use" }, - ], - } - : assessment, - ), - unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors: - unsupportedProjection.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors, - }), - }, - { text: "Final model" }, - { text: "YES" }, - ], - "3", - ); - - expect(result.checkpoint.operatorProjections?.[0]).toMatchObject({ - selectedClauseId: null, - selectedUnsupportedAnchorLabel: "energy-use", - selectedCardId: null, - selectedPredicate: null, - }); - expect(JSON.stringify(result.requests[4]?.messages)).toContain( - "clause=unsupported-active-anchor", - ); - expect(result.checkpoint.operatorProjections?.[1]).toMatchObject({ - selectedClauseId: "SP-MIN", - selectedUnsupportedAnchorLabel: null, - selectedCardId: "CPS-Q03", - selectedPredicate: "below-demanded-grade", - }); - }); - - test("treats forced wrap as a stimulus and never as an expert/operator frame", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - const replies: StubReply[] = []; - for (let turn = 1; turn <= 19; turn++) { - const minimumQuote = - turn === 1 - ? evidenceByClause["SP-MIN"] - : `Ordinary minimum range remains unknown at turn ${turn}.`; - replies.push( - { text: `Question ${turn}.` }, - { text: "NO" }, - { - text: turn === 1 ? FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE : minimumQuote, - }, - { - text: JSON.stringify( - condition3Projection({ - minimumEvidence: { turn, quote: minimumQuote }, - }), - ), - }, - ); - } - replies.push({ text: "Final model after forced wrap." }, { text: "YES" }); - - const result = await runBaseline(baselineCopy, replies, "3"); - - expect(result.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("delivered-after-forced-wrap"); - expect(result.checkpoint.operatorProjections).toHaveLength(19); - expect( - result.checkpoint.interviewerMessages.some( - ({ content }) => - content.includes("") && - content.includes("Please produce the model now"), - ), - ).toBe(true); - expect( - result.requests.filter(({ system }) => - system?.includes("test-only completion operator"), - ), - ).toHaveLength(19); - expect(JSON.stringify(result.requests[76]?.messages)).toContain( - "Please produce the model now", - ); - expect( - result.requests - .filter(({ system }) => system?.includes("Marta Iversen")) - .some(({ messages }) => - JSON.stringify(messages).includes("Please produce the model now"), - ), - ).toBe(false); - }); - - test("resumes after a completed forced-wrap turn without regenerating or duplicating it", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - const replies: StubReply[] = []; - for (let turn = 1; turn <= 19; turn++) { - const minimumQuote = - turn === 1 - ? evidenceByClause["SP-MIN"] - : `Ordinary minimum range remains unknown at turn ${turn}.`; - replies.push( - { text: `Question ${turn}.` }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: turn === 1 ? FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE : minimumQuote }, - { - text: JSON.stringify( - condition3Projection({ - minimumEvidence: { turn, quote: minimumQuote }, - }), - ), - }, - ); - } - replies.push({ text: "Question 20." }, { text: "NO" }); - - const interrupted = await runBaselineFailure(baselineCopy, replies); - expect(interrupted.checkpoint?.stopReason).toBe( - "forced-wrap-in-progress", - ); - await rm(join(baselineCopy.testDirectory, "requests.jsonl")); - - const resumed = await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [{ text: "Final model on turn 21." }, { text: "YES" }], - "3", - "--resume", - ); - - expect(resumed.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("delivered-after-forced-wrap"); - expect( - resumed.checkpoint.interviewerMessages.filter(({ content }) => - content.includes(""), - ), - ).toHaveLength(2); - expect( - resumed.checkpoint.interviewerMessages.filter( - ({ content }) => content === "Question 20.", - ), - ).toHaveLength(1); +describe.skipIf(!contextRootPresent)("baseline runner", () => { + test("rejects an output override without the stub module before API calls or output", async () => { + const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); + let apiCalls = 0; + const server = createServer((_request, response) => { + apiCalls += 1; + response.writeHead(500).end(); }); - - test("supplies every stitched non-final interviewer piece to expert, operator, and later interviewer views", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - const result = await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { text: "Question part one ", truncated: true }, - { text: "and part two." }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE }, - { text: JSON.stringify(condition3Projection()) }, - { text: "Final model" }, - { text: "YES" }, - ], - "3", - ); - - for (const requestIndex of [3, 4, 5]) { - expect( - JSON.stringify(result.requests[requestIndex]?.messages), - ).toContain("Question part one and part two."); - } - expect(result.checkpoint.interviewerMessages[1]).toMatchObject({ - content: "Question part one ", - continuations: [expect.objectContaining({ content: "and part two." })], - }); + await new Promise((resolve) => { + server.listen(0, "127.0.0.1", resolve); }); - - test.each([ - [ - "missing", - (files: Array<{ path: string; sha256: string }>) => files.slice(1), - ], - [ - "extra", - (files: Array<{ path: string; sha256: string }>) => [ - ...files, - { path: "unexpected.md", sha256: "0".repeat(64) }, - ], - ], + const address = server.address(); + if (!address || typeof address === "string") { + throw new Error("Expected the test API server to listen on a TCP port"); + } + + const { BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: _stubModule, ...env } = + process.env; + const subprocess = spawn( + process.execPath, [ - "duplicate", - (files: Array<{ path: string; sha256: string }>) => [ - ...files, - files[0] as { path: string; sha256: string }, - ], - ], - [ - "reordered", - (files: Array<{ path: string; sha256: string }>) => - [...files].reverse(), + "--experimental-strip-types", + join(baselineCopy.protocolDirectory, "run.ts"), + "1", ], - ["empty", () => []], - ])( - "rejects a %s condition-3 manifest before model calls", - async (_name, mutate) => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - await mutateCondition3Lock(baselineCopy, (lock) => ({ - ...lock, - files: mutate(lock.files), - })); - - const result = await runBaselineFailure(baselineCopy, []); - - expect(result.stderr).toMatch( - /manifest is not canonical|invalid envelope/u, - ); - expect(result.requests).toEqual([]); + { + cwd: baselineCopy.testDirectory, + env: { + ...env, + ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL: `http://127.0.0.1:${address.port}`, + BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR: baselineCopy.outputDirectory, + }, + stdio: ["ignore", "ignore", "pipe"], }, ); - - test("rejects a falsely early self-declared sealedAt", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - await mutateCondition3Lock(baselineCopy, (lock) => ({ - ...lock, - sealedAt: "2000-01-01T00:00:00.000Z", - })); - - const result = await runBaselineFailure(baselineCopy, []); - - expect(result.stderr).toContain( - "condition-3 preregistration chronology is invalid", - ); - expect(result.requests).toEqual([]); + subprocess.stderr.setEncoding("utf8"); + let stderr = ""; + subprocess.stderr.on("data", (chunk: string) => { + stderr += chunk; }); - - test("retries malformed and contradictory operator projections before selection", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - const contradictory = condition3Projection(); - const minimum = contradictory.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SP-MIN", - ); - if (!minimum) throw new Error("fixture lost SP-MIN"); - minimum.pass = true; - - const result = await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { - text: "Give one cohesive overview of objective, entities, activities, flow, and split policy.", - }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE }, - { text: "{}" }, - { text: JSON.stringify(contradictory) }, - { text: JSON.stringify(condition3Projection()) }, - { text: "Final model" }, - { text: "YES" }, - ], - "3", - ); - - expect(result.checkpoint.operatorAttempts).toHaveLength(3); - expect(result.checkpoint.operatorAttempts?.[0]?.attempt).toBe(1); - expect(result.checkpoint.operatorAttempts?.[1]?.attempt).toBe(2); - expect(typeof result.checkpoint.operatorAttempts?.[0]?.parseError).toBe( - "string", - ); - expect(typeof result.checkpoint.operatorAttempts?.[1]?.parseError).toBe( - "string", - ); - expect(result.checkpoint.operatorAttempts?.[2]).toMatchObject({ - attempt: 3, - parseError: null, - }); - expect(result.checkpoint.operatorProjections?.[0]?.selectedClauseId).toBe( - "SP-MIN", - ); + const exitCode = await new Promise((resolve, reject) => { + subprocess.once("error", reject); + subprocess.once("close", resolve); }); - - test("retries an evidence quote absent from the supplied transcript", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - const invalidQuote = condition3Projection(); - const objective = invalidQuote.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SF-OBJ", - ); - if (!objective) throw new Error("fixture lost SF-OBJ"); - objective.evidence = [{ turn: 1, quote: "words never supplied" }]; - - const result = await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { text: "Describe the operation." }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE }, - { text: JSON.stringify(invalidQuote) }, - { text: JSON.stringify(condition3Projection()) }, - { text: "Final model" }, - { text: "YES" }, - ], - "3", - ); - - expect(result.checkpoint.operatorAttempts?.[0]?.parseError).toContain( - "does not occur in supplied transcript", - ); - expect(result.checkpoint.operatorProjections).toHaveLength(1); + await new Promise((resolve, reject) => { + server.close((error) => (error ? reject(error) : resolve())); }); - test("labels the single-session correction but rejects it as opening evidence", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - const stimulusEvidence = condition3Projection(); - const objective = stimulusEvidence.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SF-OBJ", - ); - if (!objective) throw new Error("fixture lost SF-OBJ"); - objective.evidence = [ - { - turn: 0, - quote: "No external data or later follow-up will arrive.", - }, - ]; + expect(exitCode).toBe(1); + expect(stderr).toContain( + "BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR requires BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE", + ); + expect(apiCalls).toBe(0); + expect(existsSync(baselineCopy.outputDirectory)).toBe(false); + }); - const result = await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { text: "Describe the operation." }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE }, - { text: JSON.stringify(stimulusEvidence) }, - { text: JSON.stringify(condition3Projection()) }, - { text: "Final model" }, - { text: "YES" }, - ], + test("refuses the retired condition 3 entry point", async () => { + const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); + const subprocess = spawn( + process.execPath, + [ + "--experimental-strip-types", + join(baselineCopy.protocolDirectory, "run.ts"), "3", - ); - - expect(JSON.stringify(result.requests[3]?.messages)).toContain( - "", - ); - expect(result.checkpoint.operatorAttempts?.[0]?.parseError).toContain( - "does not occur in supplied transcript", - ); - }); - - test("labels the impatience stimulus but rejects it as expert evidence", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - const stimulusEvidence = condition3Projection(); - const objective = stimulusEvidence.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SF-OBJ", - ); - if (!objective) throw new Error("fixture lost SF-OBJ"); - objective.evidence = [ - { - turn: 2, - quote: "floor huddle in ten minutes", + ], + { + cwd: baselineCopy.testDirectory, + env: { + ...process.env, + BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: STUB_MODULE, + BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR: baselineCopy.outputDirectory, }, - ]; - - const result = await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { text: "Describe the operation." }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE }, - { text: JSON.stringify(condition3Projection()) }, - { text: "Anything else?" }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: "Nothing else." }, - { text: JSON.stringify(stimulusEvidence) }, - { text: JSON.stringify(condition3Projection()) }, - { text: "Final model" }, - { text: "YES" }, - ], - "3", - ); - - expect(JSON.stringify(result.requests[7]?.messages)).toContain( - "", - ); - expect(result.checkpoint.operatorAttempts?.[1]?.parseError).toContain( - "does not occur in supplied transcript", - ); - }); - - test("fails closed after exhausting malformed operator retries", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - const result = await runBaselineFailure(baselineCopy, [ - { text: "Describe the operation." }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE }, - { text: "{}" }, - { text: "{}" }, - { text: "{}" }, - ]); - - expect(result.stderr).toContain( - "condition-3 operator exhausted projection-validation attempts", - ); - expect(result.checkpoint?.stopReason).toBe("operator-projection-failure"); - expect(result.checkpoint?.operatorAttempts).toHaveLength(3); - expect(result.checkpoint?.operatorProjections).toEqual([]); - }); - - test("executes the semantic no-progress advisory and hard stop", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - const replies: StubReply[] = []; - for (let turn = 1; turn <= 5; turn++) { - replies.push( - { text: `Prompt ${turn}.` }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: "I have nothing to add." }, - { text: JSON.stringify(condition3NoProgressProjection()) }, - ); - } - replies.push( - { text: "Final limited model with explicit gaps." }, - { text: "YES" }, - ); - const result = await runBaseline(baselineCopy, replies, "3"); - - expect(result.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe( - "delivered-after-no-progress-hard-stop", - ); - expect( - result.checkpoint.operatorProjections?.map( - ({ noProgressStreak }) => noProgressStreak, - ), - ).toEqual([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]); - expect( - result.checkpoint.operatorProjections?.[2]?.noProgressAdvisory, - ).toBe(true); - expect(result.requests).toHaveLength(22); - expect(JSON.stringify(result.requests[20]?.messages)).toContain( - "do not ask another question", - ); - }); - - test.each([ - "Give objective, entities, activities, flow, and split policy as one cohesive five-item overview.", - "State the objective. Name the entities. Describe the activities. Explain the flow. Give the split rule.", - ])( - "keeps GEN-Q02 layer-2 unobservable for: %s", - async (interviewerMessage) => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - const result = await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { text: interviewerMessage }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE }, - { text: JSON.stringify(condition3Projection()) }, - { text: "Final model" }, - { text: "YES" }, - ], - "3", - ); - - expect(result.checkpoint.genQ02Layer2?.verdict).toBe("unobservable"); - expect( - result.checkpoint.operatorProjections?.[0]?.activationMatches, - ).not.toContainEqual(expect.objectContaining({ cardId: "GEN-Q02" })); - }, - ); - - test.each(["--resume", "--continue-final"] as const)( - "rejects a checkpoint seal mismatch on %s before model calls", - async (recoveryMode) => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - if (recoveryMode === "--resume") { - await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { text: "Describe the operation." }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: "Partial expert evidence", truncated: true }, - ], - "3", - ); - } else { - await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { text: "part-1", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-2", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-3", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-4", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-5", truncated: true }, - { text: "YES" }, - ], - "3", - ); - } - const rawPath = join( - baselineCopy.outputDirectory, - "condition-3.raw.json", - ); - const raw = JSON.parse(await readFile(rawPath, "utf8")) as { - preregistration: { sha256: string }; - }; - raw.preregistration.sha256 = "0".repeat(64); - await writeFile(rawPath, JSON.stringify(raw, null, 2)); - await rm(join(baselineCopy.testDirectory, "requests.jsonl")); - - const result = await runBaselineFailure(baselineCopy, [], recoveryMode); - - expect(result.stderr).toContain("checkpoint binding mismatch"); - expect(result.requests).toEqual([]); + stdio: ["ignore", "ignore", "pipe"], }, ); - - test("rejects semantically edited checkpoint projections before resume calls", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { text: "Describe the operation." }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE }, - { text: JSON.stringify(condition3Projection()) }, - { text: "part-1", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-2", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-3", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-4", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-5", truncated: true }, - { text: "NO" }, - ], - "3", - ); - const rawPath = join( - baselineCopy.outputDirectory, - "condition-3.raw.json", - ); - const raw = JSON.parse(await readFile(rawPath, "utf8")) as { - operatorProjections: Array<{ noProgressStreak: number }>; - }; - raw.operatorProjections[0]!.noProgressStreak = 999; - await writeFile(rawPath, JSON.stringify(raw, null, 2)); - await rm(join(baselineCopy.testDirectory, "requests.jsonl")); - - const result = await runBaselineFailure(baselineCopy, [], "--resume"); - - expect(result.stderr).toContain( - "checkpoint projection semantics disagree at turn 1", - ); - expect(result.requests).toEqual([]); + subprocess.stderr.setEncoding("utf8"); + let stderr = ""; + subprocess.stderr.on("data", (chunk: string) => { + stderr += chunk; }); - - test("resumes condition 3 into an append-only segment with a sealed source seam", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { text: "Describe the operation." }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: "Partial expert evidence", truncated: true }, - ], - "3", - ); - const sourcePath = join( - baselineCopy.outputDirectory, - "condition-3.raw.json", - ); - const sourceContent = await readFile(sourcePath, "utf8"); - const sourceHash = createHash("sha256") - .update(sourceContent) - .digest("hex"); - await rm(join(baselineCopy.testDirectory, "requests.jsonl")); - - const resumed = await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { text: FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE }, - { text: JSON.stringify(condition3Projection()) }, - { text: "Final model" }, - { text: "YES" }, - ], - "3", - "--resume", - ); - - expect(await readFile(sourcePath, "utf8")).toBe(sourceContent); - expect(resumed.checkpoint.recovery).toMatchObject({ - mode: "resume", - sourceRawPath: sourcePath, - sourceSha256: sourceHash, - seams: [ - expect.objectContaining({ - kind: "truncated-expert-regeneration", - sourceHadTruncationMarker: true, - sourceContent: "Partial expert evidence", - }), - ], - }); + const exitCode = await new Promise((resolve, reject) => { + subprocess.once("error", reject); + subprocess.once("close", resolve); }); - test("records an append-only seam when regenerating a truncated interviewer turn", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { text: "part-1", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-2", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-3", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-4", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-5", truncated: true }, - { text: "NO" }, - ], - "3", - ); - await rm(join(baselineCopy.testDirectory, "requests.jsonl")); - - const resumed = await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { text: "Describe the operation." }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE }, - { text: JSON.stringify(condition3Projection()) }, - { text: "Final model" }, - { text: "YES" }, - ], - "3", - "--resume", - ); + expect(exitCode).toBe(1); + expect(stderr).toContain("usage: node run.ts <1|2|4>"); + expect(existsSync(baselineCopy.outputDirectory)).toBe(false); + }); - expect(resumed.checkpoint.recovery?.seams).toContainEqual( - expect.objectContaining({ - kind: "truncated-interviewer-regeneration", - sourceHadTruncationMarker: true, - sourceContent: "part-1part-2part-3part-4part-5", - }), - ); + test("checkpoints a truncated expert reply and stops before another interviewer call", async () => { + const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); + const result = await runBaseline(testDirectory, [ + { text: "What happens next?" }, + { text: "NO" }, + { text: "The operator begins to explain", truncated: true }, + ]); + + expect(result.checkpoint.calls).toHaveLength(3); + expect(result.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("expert-truncated"); + expect(result.checkpoint.interviewerMessages.at(-1)).toEqual({ + role: "user", + content: "The operator begins to explain", + truncated: true, }); + expect(result.stderr).toContain("expert reply is truncated"); + }); - test("refuses to resume operator exhaustion before any further model call", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - await runBaselineFailure(baselineCopy, [ - { text: "Describe the operation." }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: FIRST_EXPERT_EVIDENCE }, - { text: "{}" }, - { text: "{}" }, - { text: "{}" }, - ]); - await rm(join(baselineCopy.testDirectory, "requests.jsonl")); + test("preserves the condition 2 prompt and completion path", async () => { + const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); + const result = await runBaseline( + testDirectory, + [{ text: "Final structured model" }, { text: "YES" }], + "2", + ); - const refused = await runBaselineFailure(baselineCopy, [], "--resume"); + expect(result.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("delivered"); + expect(result.requests[0]?.system).toContain( + "You are an expert process-model elicitor", + ); + }); - expect(refused.stderr).toContain("terminal checkpoint cannot resume"); - expect(refused.requests).toEqual([]); - }); + test("resume regenerates a trailing truncated expert reply before continuing", async () => { + const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); + await runBaseline(testDirectory, [ + { text: "What happens next?" }, + { text: "NO" }, + { text: "Partial expert reply", truncated: true }, + ]); - test("continues condition 3 without overwriting or clearing the source truncation marker", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [ - { text: "part-1", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-2", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-3", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-4", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-5", truncated: true }, - { text: "YES" }, - ], - "3", - ); - const sourcePath = join( - baselineCopy.outputDirectory, - "condition-3.raw.json", - ); - const sourceContent = await readFile(sourcePath, "utf8"); - const sourceHash = createHash("sha256") - .update(sourceContent) - .digest("hex"); - await rm(join(baselineCopy.testDirectory, "requests.jsonl")); + const resumed = await runBaseline( + testDirectory, + [ + { text: "Complete expert reply" }, + { text: "Final model" }, + { text: "YES" }, + ], + "1", + "--resume", + ); - const continued = await runBaseline( - baselineCopy, - [{ text: " tail" }], - "3", - "--continue-final", - ); + expect(resumed.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("delivered"); + expect(resumed.checkpoint.interviewerMessages).toEqual([ + expect.objectContaining({ role: "user" }), + { role: "assistant", content: "What happens next?" }, + { role: "user", content: "Complete expert reply" }, + { role: "assistant", content: "Final model" }, + ]); + expect(resumed.stderr).toContain("regenerating truncated expert reply"); + }); - expect(await readFile(sourcePath, "utf8")).toBe(sourceContent); - expect(continued.checkpoint.recovery).toMatchObject({ - mode: "continue-final", - sourceSha256: sourceHash, - seams: [expect.objectContaining({ kind: "final-continuation" })], - }); - const finalMessage = continued.checkpoint.interviewerMessages.at(-1); - expect(finalMessage).toMatchObject({ - role: "assistant", - content: "part-1", - truncated: true, - }); - expect(finalMessage?.continuations).toContainEqual( - expect.objectContaining({ content: "part-2", truncated: true }), - ); - expect(finalMessage?.continuations).toContainEqual( - expect.objectContaining({ content: "part-5", truncated: true }), - ); - expect(finalMessage?.continuations).toContainEqual( - expect.objectContaining({ content: " tail", truncated: false }), - ); - expect(continued.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("delivered"); + test("checkpoints a capped non-final interviewer reply and stops before calling the expert", async () => { + const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); + const result = await runBaseline(testDirectory, [ + { text: "part-1", truncated: true }, + { text: "part-2", truncated: true }, + { text: "part-3", truncated: true }, + { text: "part-4", truncated: true }, + { text: "part-5", truncated: true }, + { text: "NO" }, + ]); + + expect(result.checkpoint.calls).toHaveLength(6); + expect(result.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("interviewer-truncated"); + expect(result.checkpoint.interviewerMessages.at(-1)).toEqual({ + role: "assistant", + content: "part-1part-2part-3part-4part-5", + truncated: true, }); + expect(result.stderr).toContain("non-final interviewer reply is truncated"); + }); - test("refuses final continuation for a truncated non-delivery checkpoint", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - const replies: StubReply[] = []; - for (let turn = 1; turn <= 5; turn++) { - replies.push( - { text: `Prompt ${turn}.` }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: "I have nothing to add." }, - { text: JSON.stringify(condition3NoProgressProjection()) }, - ); - } - replies.push( - { text: "partial-1", truncated: true }, - { text: "partial-2", truncated: true }, - { text: "partial-3", truncated: true }, - { text: "partial-4", truncated: true }, - { text: "partial-5", truncated: true }, - { text: "NO" }, - ); - const stopped = await runBaseline(baselineCopy, replies, "3"); - expect(stopped.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe( - "no-progress-hard-stop-undelivered-incomplete", - ); - await rm(join(baselineCopy.testDirectory, "requests.jsonl")); - - const refused = await runBaselineFailure( - baselineCopy, - [], - "--continue-final", - ); + test("continues a truncated final delivery without sending checkpoint metadata", async () => { + const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); + await runBaseline(testDirectory, [ + { text: "part-1", truncated: true }, + { text: "part-2", truncated: true }, + { text: "part-3", truncated: true }, + { text: "part-4", truncated: true }, + { text: "part-5", truncated: true }, + { text: "YES" }, + ]); + await rm(join(testDirectory.testDirectory, "requests.jsonl")); + + const continued = await runBaseline( + testDirectory, + [{ text: " continued" }], + "1", + "--continue-final", + ); - expect(refused.stderr).toContain("nothing to continue"); - expect(refused.requests).toEqual([]); + expect(continued.requests).toHaveLength(1); + expect(continued.requests[0]?.messages).toEqual([ + expect.objectContaining({ role: "user" }), + { role: "assistant", content: "part-1part-2part-3part-4part-5" }, + { + role: "user", + content: + "You were cut off mid-document. Continue exactly from where you stopped — no preamble, no repetition.", + }, + ]); + for (const message of continued.requests[0]?.messages ?? []) { + expect(Object.keys(message).sort()).toEqual(["content", "role"]); + } + expect(continued.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("delivered"); + expect(continued.checkpoint.interviewerMessages.at(-1)).toEqual({ + role: "assistant", + content: "part-1part-2part-3part-4part-5 continued", }); - }, -); + }); +}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts index f35b536ff89..68e34b86a02 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ describe("role prefixes name what a package is architecturally (spec §12.2)", ( test("every package under packages/ is core or carries a role prefix", () => { for (const pkg of PACKAGES.filter((p) => p.kind === "package")) { expect(pkg.dir).toMatch( - /^(core|plugin-[a-z0-9-]+|binding-[a-z0-9-]+|transport-[a-z0-9-]+)$/, + /^(core|repertoire|plugin-[a-z0-9-]+|binding-[a-z0-9-]+|transport-[a-z0-9-]+)$/, ); } }); @@ -182,6 +182,19 @@ describe("dependency direction (spec §4, §12.2)", () => { } }); + test("the repertoire depends on core only, and only bindings depend on it (ADR-0007)", () => { + const repertoire = PACKAGES.find((pkg) => pkg.dir === "repertoire"); + expect(repertoire).toBeDefined(); + expect(runtimeDependencies(repertoire!)).toEqual([CORE]); + for (const pkg of PACKAGES) { + if (pkg.dir === "repertoire" || pkg.dir.startsWith("binding-")) continue; + expect({ + pkg: pkg.dir, + dependsOnRepertoire: allDependencies(pkg).includes(repertoire!.name), + }).toEqual({ pkg: pkg.dir, dependsOnRepertoire: false }); + } + }); + test("transports consume harness parts and their wire encoder only", () => { const transports = byRole("transport"); expect(transports.length).toBeGreaterThan(0); @@ -454,6 +467,8 @@ describe("the HASH smoke is runnable without a model key or a network (spec §12 * path enters here by review only. */ const SUBSTRATE_INTEGRATION_ENTRY_POINTS: Readonly> = { + "apps/brunch-agent/test/fixtures/baseline-harness-interviewer.ts": + "A pi-ai faux provider whose scripted responses stand in for the interviewer model when baseline-harness.test.ts runs the condition-5 evaluation runner as a child process; it exports the provider and decides each response from the model-visible context — no provider key, no socket, no model call.", "apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-ask.integration.ts": "Boots the real Gherkin elicitor on Flue's node runtime with pi-ai's faux provider and drives the committed application route over app.fetch through a full ask suspend/return/resume cycle plus a refused duplicate — no provider key, no socket, no external checkout mutation.", "apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts": diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/condition-3-instrument.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/condition-3-instrument.test.ts deleted file mode 100644 index e311cfa8f52..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/condition-3-instrument.test.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,766 +0,0 @@ -import * as v from "valibot"; -import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; - -import { - assertCompleteCondition3Result, - assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics, - assertCondition3UnsupportedAnchorContinuity, - CONDITION_3_ACTIVATION_MATRIX, - CONDITION_3_COMPARISON_HASHES, - CONDITION_3_DEMAND_CLAUSES, - CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE, - CONDITION_3_OBJECTIVE_MATCH_PREDICATES, - CONDITION_3_RESULT_COMPONENT_IDS, - CONDITION_3_STOPPING_RULES, - Condition3ResultSchema, - nextCondition3NoProgressStreak, - parseCondition3Projection, - type Condition3Projection, -} from "../../../../evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-instrument"; - -function projection( - evidence: Array<{ turn: number; quote: string }> = [], -): Condition3Projection { - return { - activeObjectiveRows: [], - activeObjectiveRowEvidence: [], - retractedObjectiveAnchors: [], - unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors: [], - assessments: CONDITION_3_DEMAND_CLAUSES.map((clause) => - clause.row === null - ? { - clauseId: clause.id, - demand: clause.demand, - coordinate: clause.coordinate, - demanded: true as const, - currentStatus: "none" as const, - currentGrade: "none" as const, - pass: false as const, - failureDiagnostic: clause.demand.startsWith("presence count >=") - ? ("below-minimum-count" as const) - : ("unaddressed" as const), - activationPredicates: [], - evidence: clause.id === "SF-OBJ" ? evidence : [], - observedCount: clause.demand.startsWith("presence count >=") - ? 0 - : null, - rationale: "fixture", - } - : { - clauseId: clause.id, - demand: clause.demand, - coordinate: clause.coordinate, - demanded: false as const, - currentStatus: "not-applicable" as const, - currentGrade: "not-applicable" as const, - pass: true as const, - failureDiagnostic: null, - activationPredicates: [] as [], - evidence: [], - observedCount: null, - rationale: "inactive fixture row", - }, - ), - notes: [], - }; -} - -describe("condition 3 material-frame no-progress rule", () => { - test("counts onset and reaches the frozen advisory and hard-stop thresholds", () => { - const first = projection(); - const second = projection(); - const third = projection(); - const fourth = projection(); - const fifth = projection(); - const streak1 = nextCondition3NoProgressStreak([], first, 1, 0); - const streak2 = nextCondition3NoProgressStreak([first], second, 2, streak1); - const streak3 = nextCondition3NoProgressStreak( - [first, second], - third, - 3, - streak2, - ); - const streak4 = nextCondition3NoProgressStreak( - [first, second, third], - fourth, - 4, - streak3, - ); - const streak5 = nextCondition3NoProgressStreak( - [first, second, third, fourth], - fifth, - 5, - streak4, - ); - - expect(streak1).toBe(1); - expect(streak3).toBe(CONDITION_3_STOPPING_RULES.noProgressAdvisoryAfter); - expect(streak5).toBe(CONDITION_3_STOPPING_RULES.noProgressHardStopAfter); - }); - - test("does not reset for regrading, active-row drift, duplicates, or reordered evidence", () => { - const prior = projection([ - { turn: 1, quote: "first" }, - { turn: 1, quote: "second" }, - ]); - const current = projection([ - { turn: 1, quote: "second" }, - { turn: 1, quote: "first" }, - { turn: 1, quote: "first" }, - ]); - current.activeObjectiveRows = ["ROW-SPLIT"]; - const objective = current.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SF-OBJ", - ); - if (!objective?.demanded) - throw new Error("fixture lost demanded objective"); - objective.currentStatus = "explicit"; - objective.currentGrade = "structured"; - - expect(nextCondition3NoProgressStreak([prior], current, 2, 2)).toBe(3); - expect( - nextCondition3NoProgressStreak( - [{ ...prior, assessments: [...prior.assessments].reverse() }], - { ...current, assessments: [...current.assessments].reverse() }, - 2, - 2, - ), - ).toBe(3); - }); - - test("resets for new or replacement demanded evidence at equal array length", () => { - const prior = projection([{ turn: 1, quote: "old evidence" }]); - const replacement = projection([{ turn: 2, quote: "new evidence" }]); - - expect(nextCondition3NoProgressStreak([prior], replacement, 2, 4)).toBe(0); - }); - - test("does not reset for evidence-array growth made only of old-frame quotes", () => { - const prior = projection([{ turn: 1, quote: "old evidence" }]); - const duplicateGrowth = projection([ - { turn: 1, quote: "old evidence" }, - { turn: 1, quote: "old evidence" }, - ]); - - expect(nextCondition3NoProgressStreak([prior], duplicateGrowth, 2, 1)).toBe( - 2, - ); - }); - - test("resets for new demanded unsupported-anchor evidence", () => { - const prior = projection(); - prior.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors = [ - { - label: "energy-use", - state: "active", - demanded: true, - pass: false, - failureDiagnostic: "unsupported-active-anchor", - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "Minimize energy use." }], - resolutionEvidence: [], - resolutionRationale: null, - rationale: "No frozen row.", - }, - ]; - const current = structuredClone(prior); - current.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors[0]?.evidence.push({ - turn: 2, - quote: "Peak energy matters most.", - }); - - expect(nextCondition3NoProgressStreak([prior], current, 2, 4)).toBe(0); - }); - - test("does not reset when an older quote disappears and later resurfaces", () => { - const first = projection([{ turn: 1, quote: "old evidence" }]); - const middle = projection(); - const resurfaced = projection([{ turn: 3, quote: "old evidence" }]); - - expect( - nextCondition3NoProgressStreak([first, middle], resurfaced, 3, 2), - ).toBe(3); - }); - - test("does not reset when evidence first appeared on an inactive row", () => { - const first = projection(); - const inactiveBreakdown = first.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "BR-CAP", - ); - if (!inactiveBreakdown) throw new Error("fixture lost BR-CAP"); - inactiveBreakdown.evidence = [{ turn: 1, quote: "Both lines can coat." }]; - const current = projection([{ turn: 3, quote: "Both lines can coat." }]); - - expect(nextCondition3NoProgressStreak([first], current, 3, 2)).toBe(3); - }); - - test("does not reset when retraction evidence later resurfaces", () => { - const first = projection(); - first.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors = [ - { - label: "energy-use", - state: "retracted", - demanded: false, - pass: true, - failureDiagnostic: null, - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "Minimize energy use." }], - resolutionEvidence: [ - { turn: 2, quote: "Energy use is not an objective." }, - ], - resolutionRationale: "The expert explicitly retracts it.", - rationale: "No frozen row.", - }, - ]; - const current = projection([ - { turn: 3, quote: "Energy use is not an objective." }, - ]); - - expect(nextCondition3NoProgressStreak([first], current, 3, 2)).toBe(3); - }); -}); - -describe("condition 3 frozen envelopes", () => { - test("keeps the constructed operator template internally valid", () => { - const parsed = parseCondition3Projection( - CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - ); - - expect(() => assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(parsed)).not.toThrow(); - }); - - test("requires exact transcript-supported evidence for every active objective row", () => { - const parsed = parseCondition3Projection({ - ...CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - activeObjectiveRows: ["ROW-SPLIT"], - activeObjectiveRowEvidence: [], - }); - - expect(() => assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(parsed)).toThrow( - "must equal the unique row projection", - ); - }); - - test("freezes each objective row to its exact FE-1402 matching predicate", () => { - expect(CONDITION_3_OBJECTIVE_MATCH_PREDICATES).toEqual([ - { row: "ROW-BREAKDOWN", matchingPredicate: "breakdown-reshuffle" }, - { row: "ROW-IDLE-WASH", matchingPredicate: "idle-vs-washdown" }, - { row: "ROW-CHANGEOVER", matchingPredicate: "changeover-accounting" }, - { row: "ROW-SPLIT", matchingPredicate: "split-run" }, - ]); - expect(() => - parseCondition3Projection({ - ...CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - activeObjectiveRows: ["ROW-SPLIT"], - activeObjectiveRowEvidence: [ - { - row: "ROW-SPLIT", - anchorLabel: "split-orders", - matchingPredicate: "changeover-accounting", - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "Split this order." }], - rationale: "wrong row/predicate pair", - }, - ], - }), - ).toThrow('Expected "split-run" but received "changeover-accounting"'); - }); - - test("preserves multiple objective anchors that project to one active row", () => { - const parsed = parseCondition3Projection({ - ...CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - activeObjectiveRows: ["ROW-SPLIT"], - activeObjectiveRowEvidence: [ - { - row: "ROW-SPLIT", - anchorLabel: "split-for-dates", - matchingPredicate: "split-run", - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "Split orders to hit dates." }], - rationale: "Explicit split objective.", - }, - { - row: "ROW-SPLIT", - anchorLabel: "split-for-capacity", - matchingPredicate: "split-run", - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "Split orders to use spare capacity." }], - rationale: "A second explicit split objective.", - }, - ], - }); - const objective = parsed.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SF-OBJ", - ); - if (!objective) throw new Error("fixture lost SF-OBJ"); - Object.assign(objective, { - currentStatus: "explicit", - currentGrade: "none", - pass: true, - failureDiagnostic: null, - observedCount: 2, - evidence: [ - { turn: 1, quote: "Split orders to hit dates." }, - { turn: 1, quote: "Split orders to use spare capacity." }, - ], - }); - for (const assessment of parsed.assessments) { - if (assessment.clauseId.startsWith("SP-")) { - Object.assign(assessment, { - demanded: true, - currentStatus: "none", - currentGrade: "none", - pass: false, - failureDiagnostic: "unaddressed", - activationPredicates: - assessment.clauseId === "SP-ELIG" ? [] : ["slot-unaddressed"], - }); - } - } - - expect(() => assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(parsed)).not.toThrow(); - }); - - test("requires matched objective anchors to persist or retract durably", () => { - const previous = parseCondition3Projection({ - ...CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - activeObjectiveRows: ["ROW-SPLIT"], - activeObjectiveRowEvidence: [ - { - row: "ROW-SPLIT", - anchorLabel: "split-for-dates", - matchingPredicate: "split-run", - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "Split orders to hit dates." }], - rationale: "Explicit split objective.", - }, - ], - }); - const omitted = parseCondition3Projection( - CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - ); - expect(() => - assertCondition3UnsupportedAnchorContinuity(previous, omitted, 2), - ).toThrow("disappeared without a durable retraction"); - - const retracted = parseCondition3Projection({ - ...CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - retractedObjectiveAnchors: [ - { - row: "ROW-SPLIT", - anchorLabel: "split-for-dates", - matchingPredicate: "split-run", - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "Split orders to hit dates." }], - rationale: "Explicit split objective.", - resolutionEvidence: [ - { turn: 2, quote: "Splitting is no longer an objective." }, - ], - resolutionRationale: "The expert explicitly retracted it.", - }, - ], - }); - expect(() => - assertCondition3UnsupportedAnchorContinuity(previous, retracted, 2), - ).not.toThrow(); - expect(() => - assertCondition3UnsupportedAnchorContinuity(retracted, previous, 3), - ).toThrow("cannot disappear or reactivate"); - }); - - test("rejects a demanded pass whose grade does not meet the frozen demand", () => { - const parsed = parseCondition3Projection( - CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - ); - const invalid = structuredClone(parsed); - const minimum = invalid.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SP-MIN", - ); - if (!minimum) throw new Error("fixture lost SP-MIN"); - Object.assign(minimum, { - demanded: true, - currentStatus: "explicit", - currentGrade: "none", - pass: true, - failureDiagnostic: null, - activationPredicates: [], - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "some words" }], - }); - - expect(() => assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(invalid)).toThrow( - "does not satisfy the frozen evidence/grade demand", - ); - }); - - test("passes a count-only presence demand without manufacturing a grade", () => { - const parsed = parseCondition3Projection( - CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - ); - const entities = parsed.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SF-ENT", - ); - if (!entities) throw new Error("fixture lost SF-ENT"); - Object.assign(entities, { - demanded: true, - currentStatus: "explicit", - currentGrade: "none", - pass: true, - failureDiagnostic: null, - activationPredicates: [], - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "Orders and lines are entities." }], - observedCount: 2, - }); - - expect(() => assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(parsed)).not.toThrow(); - }); - - test("rejects a passing presence count below the frozen cardinality", () => { - const parsed = parseCondition3Projection( - CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - ); - const entities = parsed.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SF-ENT", - ); - if (!entities) throw new Error("fixture lost SF-ENT"); - Object.assign(entities, { - demanded: true, - currentStatus: "explicit", - currentGrade: "none", - pass: true, - failureDiagnostic: null, - activationPredicates: [], - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "One order." }], - observedCount: 1, - }); - - expect(() => assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(parsed)).toThrow( - "presence pass disagrees with observed cardinality", - ); - }); - - test("rejects a contradictory below-grade failure before it can influence the run", () => { - const parsed = parseCondition3Projection( - CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - ); - const invalid = structuredClone(parsed); - const minimum = invalid.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SP-MIN", - ); - if (!minimum) throw new Error("fixture lost SP-MIN"); - Object.assign(minimum, { - demanded: true, - currentStatus: "explicit", - currentGrade: "quantiles", - pass: false, - failureDiagnostic: "below-required-grade", - activationPredicates: ["below-demanded-grade"], - evidence: [], - }); - - expect(() => assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(invalid)).toThrow( - "requires evidence and a genuinely sub-demand grade", - ); - }); - - test("rejects the presence-only below-minimum diagnostic on a slot", () => { - const parsed = parseCondition3Projection( - CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - ); - const minimum = parsed.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SP-MIN", - ); - if (!minimum) throw new Error("fixture lost SP-MIN"); - Object.assign(minimum, { - demanded: true, - currentStatus: "none", - currentGrade: "none", - pass: false, - failureDiagnostic: "below-minimum-count", - activationPredicates: [], - evidence: [], - observedCount: null, - }); - - expect(() => assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(parsed)).toThrow( - "slot assessment forbids below-minimum-count", - ); - }); - - test("represents unsupported active objective anchors outside frozen rows", () => { - const parsed = parseCondition3Projection({ - ...CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors: [ - { - label: "energy-use", - state: "active", - demanded: true, - pass: false, - failureDiagnostic: "unsupported-active-anchor", - evidence: [{ turn: 2, quote: "Minimize energy use." }], - resolutionEvidence: [], - resolutionRationale: null, - rationale: "No frozen objective row represents this objective.", - }, - ], - }); - const objective = parsed.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SF-OBJ", - ); - if (!objective) throw new Error("fixture lost SF-OBJ"); - Object.assign(objective, { - currentStatus: "explicit", - currentGrade: "none", - pass: true, - failureDiagnostic: null, - observedCount: 1, - evidence: [{ turn: 2, quote: "Minimize energy use." }], - }); - - expect(parsed.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors[0]?.label).toBe( - "energy-use", - ); - expect(() => assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(parsed)).not.toThrow(); - }); - - test("accepts structured evidence for a vocabulary-bound minimum", () => { - const parsed = parseCondition3Projection( - CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - ); - const taxonomy = parsed.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "CH-TAX", - ); - if (!taxonomy) throw new Error("fixture lost CH-TAX"); - Object.assign(taxonomy, { - demanded: true, - currentStatus: "explicit", - currentGrade: "structured", - pass: true, - failureDiagnostic: null, - activationPredicates: [], - evidence: [ - { turn: 1, quote: "Dark-to-light is a separate changeover class." }, - ], - }); - - expect(() => assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(parsed)).not.toThrow(); - }); - - test("requires unsupported anchors to persist or retract with current-turn evidence", () => { - const previous = parseCondition3Projection({ - ...CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors: [ - { - label: "energy-use", - state: "active", - demanded: true, - pass: false, - failureDiagnostic: "unsupported-active-anchor", - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "Minimize energy use." }], - resolutionEvidence: [], - resolutionRationale: null, - rationale: "No frozen row.", - }, - ], - }); - const omitted = parseCondition3Projection( - CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - ); - expect(() => - assertCondition3UnsupportedAnchorContinuity(previous, omitted, 2), - ).toThrow("disappeared without a durable retraction"); - - const rewritten = structuredClone(previous); - rewritten.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors[0]!.evidence = [ - { turn: 2, quote: "A replacement quote." }, - ]; - expect(() => - assertCondition3UnsupportedAnchorContinuity(previous, rewritten, 2), - ).toThrow("rewrote its original evidence"); - - const retracted = parseCondition3Projection({ - ...CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors: [ - { - label: "energy-use", - state: "retracted", - demanded: false, - pass: true, - failureDiagnostic: null, - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "Minimize energy use." }], - resolutionEvidence: [ - { turn: 2, quote: "Energy use is not an objective." }, - ], - resolutionRationale: "The expert explicitly retracted the objective.", - rationale: "No frozen row.", - }, - ], - }); - expect(() => - assertCondition3UnsupportedAnchorContinuity(previous, retracted, 2), - ).not.toThrow(); - - const rewrittenResolution = structuredClone(retracted); - const retractedAnchor = - rewrittenResolution.unsupportedActiveObjectiveAnchors[0]; - if (retractedAnchor?.state !== "retracted") { - throw new Error("fixture lost retracted anchor"); - } - retractedAnchor.resolutionEvidence = [ - { turn: 3, quote: "Replacement resolution." }, - ]; - expect(() => - assertCondition3UnsupportedAnchorContinuity( - retracted, - rewrittenResolution, - 3, - ), - ).toThrow("rewrote its resolution evidence"); - }); - - test("rejects a globally valid activation predicate incompatible with its clause", () => { - const parsed = parseCondition3Projection( - CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - ); - const invalidInput = structuredClone(parsed); - const minimum = invalidInput.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SP-MIN", - ); - if (!minimum) throw new Error("fixture lost SP-MIN"); - Object.assign(minimum, { - demanded: true, - currentStatus: "none", - currentGrade: "none", - pass: false, - failureDiagnostic: "unaccepted-absence", - activationPredicates: ["absence-uncorroborated"], - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "I do not know." }], - observedCount: null, - }); - const invalid = parseCondition3Projection(invalidInput); - - expect(() => assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(invalid)).toThrow( - "activation predicate is incompatible", - ); - }); - - test("rejects omission of a compatible required activation", () => { - const parsed = parseCondition3Projection( - CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - ); - const invalid = structuredClone(parsed); - const minimum = invalid.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "SP-MIN", - ); - if (!minimum) throw new Error("fixture lost SP-MIN"); - Object.assign(minimum, { - demanded: true, - currentStatus: "explicit", - currentGrade: "verbal", - pass: false, - failureDiagnostic: "below-required-grade", - activationPredicates: [], - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "The minimum is roughly 800." }], - }); - - expect(() => assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(invalid)).toThrow( - "required activation predicate below-demanded-grade is missing", - ); - }); - - test("accepts the required unspecified-marker activation for inadmissible status", () => { - const parsed = parseCondition3Projection( - CONDITION_3_OPERATOR_ENVELOPE.template, - ); - const releaseGate = parsed.assessments.find( - ({ clauseId }) => clauseId === "IW-REL", - ); - if (!releaseGate) throw new Error("fixture lost IW-REL"); - Object.assign(releaseGate, { - demanded: true, - currentStatus: "tentative", - currentGrade: "structured", - pass: false, - failureDiagnostic: "inadmissible-status", - activationPredicates: ["unspecified-marker-present"], - evidence: [{ turn: 1, quote: "I think release is probably verbal." }], - }); - - expect(() => assertCondition3ProjectionSemantics(parsed)).not.toThrow(); - }); - - test("includes the reviewed SP-SCRAP target in CPS-Q03 activation", () => { - expect( - CONDITION_3_ACTIVATION_MATRIX.find(({ cardId }) => cardId === "CPS-Q03") - ?.clauses, - ).toEqual(["SP-BATCH", "SP-MIN", "SP-POL", "SP-CO", "SP-SCRAP"]); - }); - - test("requires every machine-readable result component exactly once", () => { - const result = v.parse(Condition3ResultSchema, { - schemaVersion: "fe-1404-condition-3-result/2026-08-25.1", - runRawSha256: "0".repeat(64), - components: CONDITION_3_RESULT_COMPONENT_IDS.map((id) => ({ - id, - verdict: "unobservable", - observation: id.startsWith("signature.") ? "unobservable" : null, - evidence: [], - rationale: "pre-observation fixture", - })), - comparisons: { - condition1: { - ...CONDITION_3_COMPARISON_HASHES.condition1, - comparison: "pending", - }, - condition2: { - ...CONDITION_3_COMPARISON_HASHES.condition2, - comparison: "pending", - }, - }, - amendments: [], - limitations: [], - }); - - expect(() => assertCompleteCondition3Result(result)).not.toThrow(); - const contradictoryGenResult = { - ...result, - components: result.components.map((component) => - component.id === "guidance.GEN-Q02.layer-2" - ? { ...component, verdict: "pass" as const } - : component, - ), - }; - expect(() => - assertCompleteCondition3Result(contradictoryGenResult), - ).toThrow("GEN-Q02 layer-2 verdict is frozen as unobservable"); - expect(() => - assertCompleteCondition3Result({ - ...result, - components: result.components.slice(1), - }), - ).toThrow("every frozen component exactly once"); - expect(() => - v.parse(Condition3ResultSchema, { - ...result, - components: result.components.map((component) => - component.id === "layer.diagnostic" - ? { ...component, verdict: "pass", evidence: [] } - : component, - ), - }), - ).toThrow("scored condition-3 result components require evidence"); - expect(() => - v.parse(Condition3ResultSchema, { - ...result, - comparisons: { - ...result.comparisons, - condition1: { ...result.comparisons.condition1, comparison: "" }, - }, - }), - ).toThrow("Invalid length: Expected >=1 but received 0"); - expect(() => - v.parse(Condition3ResultSchema, { - ...result, - comparisons: { - ...result.comparisons, - condition1: { - ...result.comparisons.condition1, - rawSha256: "0".repeat(64), - }, - }, - }), - ).toThrow(/Expected "[0-9a-f]{64}" but received "0{64}"/); - }); -}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/control-surfaces.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/control-surfaces.test.ts index 7ed3ba9f3ff..909bae0a0d0 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/control-surfaces.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/control-surfaces.test.ts @@ -105,11 +105,11 @@ describe.skipIf(!contextRootPresent)("strategic control surfaces", () => { }); test("every strategy ID in steering resolves and is unsuperseded", () => { - const governingLine = steering.match( - /Governing strategic decisions:([\s\S]*?)\n\n/, + const governingSection = steering.match( + /^## Governing concerns\n([\s\S]*?)(?=^## |(?![\s\S]))/m, ); - expect(governingLine).not.toBeNull(); - expect(governingLine![1]).toMatch(/S-\d{3}/); + expect(governingSection).not.toBeNull(); + expect(governingSection![1]).toMatch(/S-\d{3}/); const referencedIds = [...steering.matchAll(/S-\d{3}/g)].map(([id]) => id); const knownIds = new Set(entries.map(({ id }) => id)); const supersededIds = new Set( diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/completion.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/completion.test.ts index ac2381df994..1d64a425a57 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/completion.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/completion.test.ts @@ -19,18 +19,18 @@ import { absence, assertionCapture, completeCaptures, - fixturePluginFile, + fixturePluginDefinition, snapshotOf, value, } from "./slot-fixtures"; import type { CaptureEnvelope } from "../src/capture-store"; -const file = fixturePluginFile(); -const demands = completionDemands(file); +const definition = fixturePluginDefinition(); +const demands = completionDemands(definition); const modelOf = (captures: readonly CaptureEnvelope[]): ElicitedModel => - foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(captures), file); + foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(captures), definition); const without = (id: string): CaptureEnvelope[] => completeCaptures().filter((capture) => capture.id !== id); @@ -204,6 +204,35 @@ describe("the rule (3–7)", () => { expect(report.sliceNodeIds).toEqual(["objective:throughput"]); }); + test("6. a single kind:node string in the dependency slot still forms a slice", () => { + const report = evaluateCompletion( + modelOf( + replacing( + "c-objective-deps", + assertionCapture( + "c-objective-deps", + value( + "objective", + "throughput", + "the nodes it depends on", + "named", + "step:stamp", + ), + ), + ), + ), + demands, + ); + expect( + report.failures.filter( + (failure) => failure.diagnostic === "unsupported-active-objective", + ), + ).toEqual([]); + expect(report.sliceNodeIds).toEqual( + expect.arrayContaining(["objective:throughput", "step:stamp"]), + ); + }); + test("6. an objective with no dependency slot at all is unsupported; the floor does not substitute", () => { expect(diagnosticsOf(without("c-objective-deps"))).toEqual([ [ @@ -242,7 +271,7 @@ describe("what counts as a value (8–14)", () => { expect(diagnosticsOf(inferred)).toEqual([ ["inadmissible-status", "step:stamp", "how long it takes"], ]); - const permissive = completionDemands(file, { + const permissive = completionDemands(definition, { acceptedStatuses: ["explicit", "inferred"], }); expect(evaluateCompletion(modelOf(inferred), permissive).complete).toBe( diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/cue.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/cue.test.ts index 57280b9c1c2..79b0978d080 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/cue.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/cue.test.ts @@ -1,43 +1,61 @@ import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; import { completionDemands, evaluateCompletion } from "../src/completion"; -import { - buildCompletionCueSignal, - buildSweepList, - completionProtocolInstructionFragments, -} from "../src/cue"; +import { buildCompletionCueSignal, buildSweepList } from "../src/cue"; import { foldElicitedModel } from "../src/elicited-model"; +import { HARNESS_PREAMBLE } from "../src/instructions"; import { assertionCapture, completeCaptures, - fixturePluginFile, + fixturePluginDefinition, snapshotOf, value, } from "./slot-fixtures"; -const file = fixturePluginFile(); -const demands = completionDemands(file); +const definition = fixturePluginDefinition(); +const demands = completionDemands(definition); describe("the sweep list", () => { test("pairs every failure with the patterns indexed on the failing node's kind", () => { const model = foldElicitedModel( snapshotOf(completeCaptures().filter((c) => c.id !== "c-stamp-duration")), - file, + definition, ); const report = evaluateCompletion(model, demands); - const list = buildSweepList(model, report, file.patterns); + const list = buildSweepList(model, report, definition.patterns); expect(list.unsatisfied.map((f) => f.diagnostic)).toEqual(["unaddressed"]); expect(list.patterns).toEqual([ { id: "P01", nodeId: "step:stamp", ask: "ask how often" }, + { id: "P03", nodeId: "step:stamp", ask: "ask for a source" }, + ]); + }); + + test("a pattern indexed on no kind fires on a failing node of any kind", () => { + // Fixture P03 is `on: []` — the contract's "any node". Fail a `thing` + // instead of a `step`: P02 (on thing) and P03 surface, P01 (on step) not. + const model = foldElicitedModel( + snapshotOf( + completeCaptures().filter((c) => c.id !== "c-widget-distinctions"), + ), + definition, + ); + const report = evaluateCompletion(model, demands); + const list = buildSweepList(model, report, definition.patterns); + const failing = list.unsatisfied.map((f) => f.nodeId); + expect(failing.every((id) => id?.startsWith("thing:"))).toBe(true); + expect(list.patterns.map((cue) => cue.id)).toEqual(["P02", "P03"]); + expect(list.patterns.map((cue) => cue.nodeId)).toEqual([ + failing[0], + failing[0], ]); }); test("surfaces nothing for a complete model", () => { - const model = foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(completeCaptures()), file); + const model = foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(completeCaptures()), definition); const list = buildSweepList( model, evaluateCompletion(model, demands), - file.patterns, + definition.patterns, ); expect(list).toEqual({ unsatisfied: [], patterns: [] }); }); @@ -53,13 +71,13 @@ describe("the cue signal", () => { value("step", "pack", "who performs it", "named", "nobody"), ), ]), - file, + definition, ); const report = evaluateCompletion(model, demands); const signal = buildCompletionCueSignal( model, report, - buildSweepList(model, report, file.patterns), + buildSweepList(model, report, definition.patterns), ); expect(signal.type).toBe("completion-cue"); expect(signal.body).toContain(`revision ${report.revision}`); @@ -82,12 +100,12 @@ describe("the cue signal", () => { "c-press-distinctions", ].includes(c.id), ); - const model = foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(captures), file); + const model = foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(captures), definition); const report = evaluateCompletion(model, demands); const signal = buildCompletionCueSignal( model, report, - buildSweepList(model, report, file.patterns), + buildSweepList(model, report, definition.patterns), { maxItems: 2, }, @@ -96,8 +114,8 @@ describe("the cue signal", () => { expect(signal.body).toContain(`and ${report.failures.length - 2} more`); }); - test("instruction fragments are render-invariant prose", () => { - for (const fragment of completionProtocolInstructionFragments()) { + test("the harness preamble is render-invariant prose", () => { + for (const fragment of HARNESS_PREAMBLE) { expect(fragment).not.toMatch(/\$\{|revision [0-9a-f]/u); } }); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/elicited-model.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/elicited-model.test.ts index 78a41559eec..567ea814183 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/elicited-model.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/elicited-model.test.ts @@ -5,18 +5,18 @@ import { absence, assertionCapture, completeCaptures, - fixturePluginFile, + fixturePluginDefinition, snapshotOf, value, } from "./slot-fixtures"; import type { JsonValue } from "../src/json-value"; -const file = fixturePluginFile(); +const definition = fixturePluginDefinition(); describe("the fold reads only active captures", () => { test("groups assertions into nodes and slots keyed by kind:node", () => { - const model = foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(completeCaptures()), file); + const model = foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(completeCaptures()), definition); expect(model.pluginVersion).toBe("fixture/2026-08-25.1"); expect(model.nodes.map((node) => node.id)).toEqual([ "objective:throughput", @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ describe("the fold reads only active captures", () => { }, ], ), - file, + definition, ); const actor = findNode(model, "step:stamp")?.slots["who performs it"]; expect(actor?.state).toBe("value"); @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ describe("the fold reads only active captures", () => { dedupKey: "manual-key-2", }, ]), - file, + definition, ); expect(model.nodes).toEqual([]); expect(model.unmapped.map((entry) => entry.captureId).sort()).toEqual([ @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ describe("competing readings", () => { canDefault: false, }, ]), - file, + definition, ); expect(findNode(model, "step:stamp")?.slots["who performs it"]?.state).toBe( "conflict", @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ describe("competing readings", () => { ), ]; const slot = findNode( - foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(captures), file), + foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(captures), definition), "step:stamp", )?.slots["who performs it"]; expect(slot).toMatchObject({ @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ describe("competing readings", () => { ), ]; const slot = findNode( - foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(captures), file), + foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(captures), definition), "step:stamp", )?.slots["who performs it"]; expect(slot?.state).toBe("divergence"); @@ -231,8 +231,10 @@ describe("competing readings", () => { ), ]; expect( - findNode(foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(captures), file), "step:stamp") - ?.slots["how long it takes"], + findNode( + foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(captures), definition), + "step:stamp", + )?.slots["how long it takes"], ).toEqual({ state: "absence", absence: "unknown-to-user", @@ -247,10 +249,10 @@ describe("competing readings", () => { describe("revision", () => { test("is stable for the same active set and changes when it changes", () => { const base = completeCaptures(); - const first = foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(base), file).revision; + const first = foldElicitedModel(snapshotOf(base), definition).revision; const again = foldElicitedModel( snapshotOf([...base].reverse()), - file, + definition, ).revision; const grown = foldElicitedModel( snapshotOf([ @@ -260,7 +262,7 @@ describe("revision", () => { value("step", "pack", "who performs it", "named", "nobody"), ), ]), - file, + definition, ).revision; expect(again).toBe(first); expect(grown).not.toBe(first); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/instructions.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/instructions.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..42330cfe9b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/instructions.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,175 @@ +import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; + +import { + HARNESS_PREAMBLE, + renderGuidance, + renderInstructions, + renderRunbook, +} from "../src/instructions"; +import { + GUIDANCE_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS, + GUIDANCE_KEYS, + RUNBOOK_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS, + RUNBOOK_KEYS, +} from "../src/keys"; +import { readPluginDefinition } from "../src/plugin-definition"; +import { readRepertoire, type Repertoire } from "../src/repertoire"; +import { FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML, fixturePluginDefinition } from "./slot-fixtures"; + +const item = (name: string) => + ` - { name: ${name}, text: default ${name}., source: test }`; +const cell = (path: string) => ` ${path}:\n${item(`${path} default`)}`; + +/** A minimal repertoire: one sourced default under every key. */ +const REPERTOIRE_YAML = `repertoire: + version: repertoire/2026-08-25.1 + purpose: test +guidance: + lenses: +${item("lenses default")} + techniques: +${item("techniques default")} + movements: + slice: +${item("slice default")} + sweep: +${item("sweep default")} + licenses: +${item("licenses default")} + motifs: +${item("motifs default")} + smells: +${item("smells default")} + rabbit_holes: +${item("rabbit_holes default")} + failure_modes: + - { name: failure default, text: default failure., signature: a sign, source: test } +runbooks: + construct: +${cell("kickoff")} +${cell("trajectory")} +${cell("close")} + review-and-revise: +${cell("kickoff")} +${cell("trajectory")} +${cell("close")} +`; + +const repertoire: Repertoire = readRepertoire(REPERTOIRE_YAML); +const definition = fixturePluginDefinition(); + +const indexOfAll = (text: string, needles: readonly string[]): number[] => + needles.map((needle) => text.indexOf(needle)); + +const ascending = (positions: readonly number[]): boolean => + positions.every( + (position, index) => + position >= 0 && (index === 0 || position > positions[index - 1]!), + ); + +describe("renderInstructions", () => { + const text = renderInstructions(repertoire, definition); + + test("opens with what the harness enforces, then the contract, then guidance, then runbooks", () => { + expect( + ascending( + indexOfAll(text, [ + "## What the harness enforces", + HARNESS_PREAMBLE[0]!, + "## Purpose", + "## Kinds", + "## Must know", + "## Patterns", + `## ${GUIDANCE_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS.lenses.title}`, + `## ${GUIDANCE_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS.failure_modes.title}`, + "## Job: construct", + `### ${RUNBOOK_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS.close.title}`, + ]), + ), + ).toBe(true); + }); + + test("renders every guidance key in catalogue order: definition, default, then the plugin cell", () => { + const positions = indexOfAll( + text, + GUIDANCE_KEYS.map((key) => `## ${GUIDANCE_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS[key].title}`), + ); + expect(ascending(positions)).toBe(true); + expect( + ascending( + indexOfAll(text, [ + `## ${GUIDANCE_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS.lenses.title}`, + GUIDANCE_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS.lenses.definition, + "**lenses default**", + "**fixture lens**", + ]), + ), + ).toBe(true); + }); + + test("renders a blank plugin cell as the default alone, never as an empty heading", () => { + // The fixture leaves `techniques` blank: the default is the whole key. + const section = renderGuidance(repertoire, definition).find((part) => + part.startsWith(`## ${GUIDANCE_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS.techniques.title}`), + )!; + expect(section).toContain("**techniques default**"); + expect(section).not.toMatch(/\n\n$/u); + }); + + test("splits movements into slice and sweep", () => { + expect( + ascending( + indexOfAll(text, [ + "### Slice", + "**slice default**", + "### Sweep", + "**sweep default**", + "**fixture sweep**", + ]), + ), + ).toBe(true); + }); + + test("renders a runbook only for the jobs the plugin declares", () => { + expect(text).toContain("## Job: construct"); + expect(text).not.toContain("## Job: review and revise"); + const runbook = renderRunbook(repertoire, definition, "construct"); + expect( + ascending( + indexOfAll( + runbook, + RUNBOOK_KEYS.map( + (key) => `### ${RUNBOOK_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS[key].title}`, + ), + ), + ), + ).toBe(true); + expect(runbook).toContain("**kickoff default**"); + expect(runbook).toContain("**fixture kickoff**"); + }); + + test("renders the contract from data: rows by kind, the floor, the declared anchor, the precision ladder", () => { + expect(text).toContain("the nodes it depends on — at least 1"); + expect(text).toContain('how many — range; "not applicable" is accepted'); + expect(text).toContain("at least 1 `objective`, 2 `thing`, 1 `step`"); + expect(text).toContain("before anything `objective`-relative counts"); + expect(text).toContain("completion is relative to `objective` nodes"); + expect(text).toContain("`spelled out` —"); + expect(text).toContain("**P02** — _when_ more than one thing competes"); + expect(text).toContain("_Signature:_ it says so"); + }); + + test("does not hardcode objective-relative completion when the anchor is another kind", () => { + const featureAnchored = readPluginDefinition( + FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replaceAll("objective", "feature"), + ); + const rendered = renderInstructions(repertoire, featureAnchored); + expect(rendered).toContain("before anything `feature`-relative counts"); + expect(rendered).toContain("completion is relative to `feature` nodes"); + expect(rendered).not.toContain("objective-relative"); + }); + + test("contains no template residue", () => { + expect(text).not.toMatch(/\$\{|undefined|\[object Object\]/u); + }); +}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-definition.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-definition.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..81b6ab99883 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-definition.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,216 @@ +import { readFileSync } from "node:fs"; +import { join } from "node:path"; + +import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; + +import { GUIDANCE_KEYS, RUNBOOK_KEYS } from "../src/keys"; +import { + guidanceEntries, + mustKnowRowsFor, + PluginDefinitionError, + readPluginDefinition, + runbookEntries, + type PluginDefinition, +} from "../src/plugin-definition"; +import { CONTEXT_ROOT, contextRootPresent } from "./architecture/workspace"; +import { FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML, fixturePluginDefinition } from "./slot-fixtures"; + +describe("the synthetic fixture definition", () => { + const definition = fixturePluginDefinition(); + + test("reads the identity block and the kind catalog", () => { + expect(definition.version).toBe("fixture/2026-08-25.1"); + expect(definition.identity).toEqual({ + id: "fixture", + formalism: "fixture", + jobs: ["construct"], + purpose: "Interview someone about things and steps.", + }); + expect(definition.kinds.map((row) => row.kind)).toEqual([ + "objective", + "thing", + "step", + ]); + expect(definition.ontology.notKinds.map((row) => row.name)).toEqual([ + "queue", + ]); + }); + + test("reads demand rows with typed precision and the not-applicable flag", () => { + expect(mustKnowRowsFor(definition, "objective")).toEqual([ + { + kind: "objective", + slot: "the question", + precision: { kind: "word", word: "spelled out" }, + notApplicableAllowed: false, + why: "anchor", + }, + { + kind: "objective", + slot: "the nodes it depends on", + precision: { kind: "at-least", count: 1 }, + notApplicableAllowed: false, + why: "slice", + }, + ]); + expect(mustKnowRowsFor(definition, "thing")[1]?.notApplicableAllowed).toBe( + true, + ); + }); + + test("reads the anchor as a declaration, not a convention", () => { + expect(definition.anchor).toEqual({ + kind: "objective", + dependencySlot: "the nodes it depends on", + }); + expect(definition.floor).toEqual([ + { kind: "objective", atLeast: 1 }, + { kind: "thing", atLeast: 2 }, + { kind: "step", atLeast: 1 }, + ]); + }); + + test("indexes patterns by the kinds their trigger names", () => { + expect(definition.patterns.map((row) => [row.id, row.kinds])).toEqual([ + ["P01", ["step"]], + ["P02", ["thing"]], + ["P03", []], + ]); + }); + + test("flattens guidance and runbook cells with their key paths", () => { + expect( + guidanceEntries(definition.guidance).map((entry) => entry.path), + ).toEqual(["lenses", "movements.sweep", "failure_modes"]); + expect( + runbookEntries(definition.runbooks).map((entry) => entry.path), + ).toEqual(["construct.kickoff"]); + }); +}); + +describe("contract violations fail to load", () => { + test.each([ + [ + "a key the harness does not own", + FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replace("guidance:\n", "guidance:\n hints: []\n"), + /hints/u, + ], + [ + "a missing group", + FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replace(/machinery:[\s\S]*$/u, ""), + /machinery/u, + ], + [ + "a malformed version", + FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replace("fixture/2026-08-25.1", "fixture-1"), + /yyyy-mm-dd/u, + ], + [ + "a demand row for an unknown kind", + FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replace( + "{ kind: step, slot: who performs it", + "{ kind: queue, slot: who performs it", + ), + /`queue`, which is not in `ontology.kinds`/u, + ], + [ + "an unknown precision word", + FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replace("precision: spread", "precision: roughly"), + /precision/u, + ], + [ + "a kind with no demand row", + FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replace(/ {4}- \{ kind: step, slot[^\n]*\n/gu, ""), + /no row for kind `step`/u, + ], + [ + "an anchor slot that is not a row", + FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replace( + "depends_on: the nodes it depends on", + "depends_on: the things it needs", + ), + /not a `must_know` row/u, + ], + [ + "an anchor slot that is not a count", + FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replace( + "depends_on: the nodes it depends on", + "depends_on: the question", + ), + /at least N/u, + ], + [ + "a pattern on an unknown kind", + FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replace("on: [step]", "on: [queue]"), + /pattern P01 names kind `queue`/u, + ], + [ + "a runbook for an undeclared job", + FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replace( + "runbooks:\n", + "runbooks:\n review-and-revise: { kickoff: [], trajectory: [], close: [] }\n", + ), + /`plugin.jobs` does not declare it/u, + ], + [ + "a guidance item without a name", + FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replace( + "{ name: fixture lens, text: Notice things. }", + "{ text: Notice things. }", + ), + /guidance.lenses.0.name/u, + ], + ["text that is not YAML", "plugin: [", /not valid YAML/u], + ])("%s", (_label, yaml, message) => { + expect(() => readPluginDefinition(yaml)).toThrow(PluginDefinitionError); + expect(() => readPluginDefinition(yaml)).toThrow(message); + }); +}); + +const readShipped = (packageName: string): PluginDefinition => + readPluginDefinition( + readFileSync( + join(CONTEXT_ROOT, "packages", packageName, "plugin.yaml"), + "utf8", + ), + ); + +/** Words that would mean the plugin knows a domain rather than a formalism. */ +const DOMAIN_WORDS = + /\b(hospital|patient|coating|vestera|truck|packaging|warehouse|factory|bakery|clinic)\b/iu; + +describe.skipIf(!contextRootPresent)("the shipped plugin definitions", () => { + test.each(["plugin-sdcpn", "plugin-gherkin"])( + "%s validates, adds no key, and names no domain", + (packageName) => { + const definition = readShipped(packageName); + expect(definition.identity.id).toBe(packageName.replace("plugin-", "")); + expect(definition.kinds.length).toBeGreaterThan(0); + expect( + definition.mustKnow.some( + (row) => + row.kind === definition.anchor.kind && + row.slot === definition.anchor.dependencySlot, + ), + ).toBe(true); + const text = JSON.stringify(definition); + expect(text).not.toMatch(DOMAIN_WORDS); + for (const key of GUIDANCE_KEYS) { + expect(definition.guidance).toHaveProperty(key); + } + for (const job of definition.identity.jobs) { + const cells = definition.runbooks[job]; + expect( + cells === undefined || RUNBOOK_KEYS.every((key) => key in cells), + ).toBe(true); + } + }, + ); + + test("the two plugins declare different anchors under the same schema", () => { + const sdcpn = readShipped("plugin-sdcpn"); + const gherkin = readShipped("plugin-gherkin"); + expect(sdcpn.anchor.kind).not.toBe(gherkin.anchor.kind); + expect(sdcpn.proposals.map((p) => p.type)).toEqual(["slot-asserted"]); + }); +}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-file.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-file.test.ts deleted file mode 100644 index 987721386b4..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-file.test.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,215 +0,0 @@ -import { readFileSync } from "node:fs"; -import { join } from "node:path"; - -import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; - -import { - parsePluginFile, - PLUGIN_FILE_HEADINGS, - PluginFileError, - pluginFileInstructions, - mustKnowRowsFor, -} from "../src/plugin-file"; -import { CONTEXT_ROOT, contextRootPresent } from "./architecture/workspace"; -import { FIXTURE_PLUGIN_MARKDOWN, fixturePluginFile } from "./slot-fixtures"; - -describe("the synthetic fixture file", () => { - const file = fixturePluginFile(); - - test("reads the version, the kind catalog, and every section", () => { - expect(file.version).toBe("fixture/2026-08-25.1"); - expect(file.kinds.map((row) => row.kind)).toEqual([ - "objective", - "thing", - "step", - ]); - expect(Object.keys(file.sections)).toEqual([...PLUGIN_FILE_HEADINGS]); - expect(file.sections.Purpose).toBe( - "Interview someone about things and steps.", - ); - }); - - test("reads demand rows with typed precision and the not-applicable flag", () => { - expect(mustKnowRowsFor(file, "objective")).toEqual([ - { - kind: "objective", - slot: "the question", - precision: { kind: "word", word: "spelled out" }, - notApplicableAllowed: false, - why: "anchor", - }, - { - kind: "objective", - slot: "the nodes it depends on", - precision: { kind: "at-least", count: 1 }, - notApplicableAllowed: false, - why: "slice", - }, - ]); - expect(mustKnowRowsFor(file, "thing")[1]?.notApplicableAllowed).toBe(true); - }); - - test("reads the static floor as counts from the prose beneath the table", () => { - expect(file.floor).toEqual([ - { kind: "objective", atLeast: 1 }, - { kind: "thing", atLeast: 2 }, - { kind: "step", atLeast: 1 }, - ]); - }); - - test("indexes patterns by the kinds their trigger names", () => { - expect(file.patterns.map((row) => [row.id, row.kinds])).toEqual([ - ["P01", ["step"]], - ["P02", ["thing"]], - ["P03", []], - ]); - }); - - test("renders every section in contract order as instructions", () => { - const instructions = pluginFileInstructions(file); - const positions = PLUGIN_FILE_HEADINGS.map((heading) => - instructions.indexOf(`## ${heading}`), - ); - expect(positions.every((position) => position >= 0)).toBe(true); - expect([...positions].sort((a, b) => a - b)).toEqual(positions); - }); -}); - -describe("contract violations fail to load", () => { - const withoutLinesStarting = (prefix: string): string => - FIXTURE_PLUGIN_MARKDOWN.split("\n") - .filter((line) => !line.startsWith(prefix)) - .join("\n"); - - test.each([ - [ - "a missing heading", - FIXTURE_PLUGIN_MARKDOWN.replace("## Moves\n", ""), - /Contract headings/u, - ], - [ - "a reordered heading", - FIXTURE_PLUGIN_MARKDOWN.replace("## Purpose", "## Kinds").replace( - /## Kinds\n\n\| #/u, - "## Purpose\n\n| #", - ), - /Contract headings/u, - ], - [ - "a renamed heading", - FIXTURE_PLUGIN_MARKDOWN.replace("## Must know", "## Demands"), - /Contract headings/u, - ], - [ - "a missing version", - FIXTURE_PLUGIN_MARKDOWN.replace(/Version: `[^`]+`/u, ""), - /immutable version/u, - ], - [ - "an unknown column", - FIXTURE_PLUGIN_MARKDOWN.replace("| projects to |", "| becomes |"), - /columns must be exactly/u, - ], - [ - "a demand row for an unknown kind", - FIXTURE_PLUGIN_MARKDOWN.replace( - "| `step` | who performs it", - "| `queue` | who performs it", - ), - /not in `## Kinds`/u, - ], - [ - "an unknown precision word", - FIXTURE_PLUGIN_MARKDOWN.replace( - "| spread | no ", - "| roughly | no ", - ), - /precision `roughly`/u, - ], - [ - "a kind with no demand row", - withoutLinesStarting("| `step`"), - /no row for kind `step`/u, - ], - [ - "a floor that names no kind", - FIXTURE_PLUGIN_MARKDOWN.replace( - /Static floor[^\n]*\n[^\n]*\n/u, - "Static floor — none.\n", - ), - /Static floor names no kind/u, - ], - [ - "a not-applicable cell that is not yes or no", - FIXTURE_PLUGIN_MARKDOWN.replace( - "| spelled out | no | anchor", - "| spelled out | maybe | anchor", - ), - /expected `yes` or `no`/u, - ], - ])("%s", (_label, markdown, message) => { - expect(() => parsePluginFile(markdown)).toThrow(PluginFileError); - expect(() => parsePluginFile(markdown)).toThrow(message); - }); -}); - -describe.skipIf(!contextRootPresent)("the SDCPN plugin file", () => { - const file = parsePluginFile( - readFileSync(join(CONTEXT_ROOT, "packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md"), "utf8"), - ); - - test("loads under the contract with Layer B's ten kinds", () => { - expect(file.version).toBe("sdcpn/2026-08-25.1"); - expect(file.kinds.map((row) => row.kind)).toEqual([ - "entity-type", - "boundary-condition", - "activity", - "ordering/flow", - "policy", - "dynamics", - "objective", - "constraint", - "data-binding", - "validation-criterion", - ]); - }); - - test("states the floor and one dependency row on the objective", () => { - expect(file.floor).toEqual([ - { kind: "objective", atLeast: 1 }, - { kind: "entity-type", atLeast: 2 }, - { kind: "activity", atLeast: 1 }, - { kind: "ordering/flow", atLeast: 1 }, - ]); - const anchors = file.mustKnow.filter( - (row) => row.kind === "objective" && row.precision.kind === "at-least", - ); - expect(anchors.map((row) => row.slot)).toEqual(["the nodes it depends on"]); - }); - - test("carries twenty-four demand rows and thirteen patterns, every pattern kind-indexed or generic", () => { - expect(file.mustKnow).toHaveLength(24); - expect(file.patterns.map((row) => row.id)).toEqual( - Array.from( - { length: 13 }, - (_, index) => `P${String(index + 1).padStart(2, "0")}`, - ), - ); - expect(file.patterns.find((row) => row.id === "P01")?.kinds).toEqual([ - "activity", - ]); - }); - - test("names no domain", () => { - const text = pluginFileInstructions(file).toLowerCase(); - for (const domainWord of [ - "coating", - "packaging", - "truck", - "fleet", - "paint", - ]) { - expect(text).not.toContain(domainWord); - } - }); -}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-schema.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-schema.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2bb144c4d5d --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-schema.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +import { readFileSync, writeFileSync } from "node:fs"; +import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; + +import { expect, test } from "vitest"; + +import { pluginJsonSchema } from "../src/plugin-json-schema"; + +const target = fileURLToPath( + new URL("../schema/plugin.schema.json", import.meta.url), +); +const emitting = process.env.PLUGIN_SCHEMA_EMIT === "1"; + +/** + * `schema/plugin.schema.json` is the emitted view of `PluginDefinitionSchema`. + * `yarn schema:emit` rewrites it after a deliberate schema change (and the + * change goes in `schema/CHANGELOG.md`); an unrewritten drift fails here. The + * comparison is structural so that the repo formatter may lay the file out. + */ +test.runIf(emitting)("emits schema/plugin.schema.json", () => { + writeFileSync(target, `${JSON.stringify(pluginJsonSchema(), null, 2)}\n`); + expect(true).toBe(true); +}); + +test.skipIf(emitting)( + "schema/plugin.schema.json is the emitted view of PluginDefinitionSchema", + () => { + const committed = JSON.parse(readFileSync(target, "utf8")) as unknown; + expect(committed).toEqual(pluginJsonSchema()); + }, +); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/slot-fixtures.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/slot-fixtures.ts index 45c43be384c..64925ed5892 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/slot-fixtures.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/slot-fixtures.ts @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ /** - * Fixtures for the read path: a small synthetic plugin file and a capture - * envelope builder. The synthetic file keeps the tests independent of the - * SDCPN file's row set; `plugin-file.test.ts` reads the real file separately. + * Fixtures for the read path: a small synthetic plugin definition and a + * capture envelope builder. The synthetic definition keeps the tests + * independent of the SDCPN definition's row set; `plugin-definition.test.ts` + * reads the real definitions separately. */ import { @@ -11,70 +12,88 @@ import { type CaptureStoreEvent, type CaptureStoreSnapshot, } from "../src/capture-store"; -import { parsePluginFile, type PluginFile } from "../src/plugin-file"; +import { + readPluginDefinition, + type PluginDefinition, +} from "../src/plugin-definition"; import type { JsonValue } from "../src/json-value"; import type { SlotAssertion } from "../src/slot-assertion"; -export const FIXTURE_PLUGIN_MARKDOWN = `# Fixture plugin - -Plugin: \`fixture\` · Target formalism: fixture · Version: \`fixture/2026-08-25.1\` - -## Purpose - -Interview someone about things and steps. - -## Kinds - -| # | kind | what it is | projects to | -| --- | ----------- | ---------- | ----------- | -| 1 | \`objective\` | A question | metrics | -| 2 | \`thing\` | A thing | colours | -| 3 | \`step\` | A step | transitions | - -Attributes apply to every kind. - -## Must know - -A slot is satisfied only by what the expert said. - -| kind | slot | precision | "not applicable" allowed | why the model needs it | -| ----------- | ----------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------ | ---------------------- | -| \`objective\` | the question | spelled out | no | anchor | -| \`objective\` | the nodes it depends on | at least 1 | no | slice | -| \`thing\` | distinctions | spelled out | no | types | -| \`thing\` | how many | range | yes | population | -| \`step\` | how long it takes | spread | no | duration | -| \`step\` | who performs it | named | yes | binding | - -Static floor — the model must contain at least one \`objective\`, at least two \`thing\` nodes, and -at least one \`step\`. - -### Precision words - -| word | means | IR grade | -| ------- | ---------------- | -------- | -| \`named\` | identified in words | verbal | - -## Patterns - -| id | when | ask | -| --- | ------------------------------- | ------------------- | -| P01 | a \`step\` is an event | ask how often | -| P02 | more than one \`thing\` competes | ask which wins | -| P03 | the expert says they do not know | ask for a source | - -## Moves - -Move one. Move two. - -## Deliverable - -The model and its loss report. +export const FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML = `plugin: + id: fixture + version: fixture/2026-08-25.1 + formalism: fixture + jobs: [construct] + purpose: Interview someone about things and steps. + +ontology: + preamble: Attributes apply to every kind. + kinds: + - { kind: objective, is: A question, projects_to: metrics } + - { kind: thing, is: A thing, projects_to: colours } + - { kind: step, is: A step, projects_to: transitions } + not_kinds: + - { name: queue, text: "A queue is a thing with a count, not a kind." } + attributes: + - name: status + on: every kind + values: [current, planned] + text: Whether the node exists today or is proposed. + +schema: + preamble: A slot is satisfied only by what the expert said. + anchor: { kind: objective, depends_on: the nodes it depends on } + floor: + - { kind: objective, at_least: 1 } + - { kind: thing, at_least: 2 } + - { kind: step, at_least: 1 } + must_know: + - { kind: objective, slot: the question, precision: spelled out, not_applicable: false, why: anchor } + - { kind: objective, slot: the nodes it depends on, precision: at least 1, not_applicable: false, why: slice } + - { kind: thing, slot: distinctions, precision: spelled out, not_applicable: false, why: types } + - { kind: thing, slot: how many, precision: range, not_applicable: true, why: population } + - { kind: step, slot: how long it takes, precision: spread, not_applicable: false, why: duration } + - { kind: step, slot: who performs it, precision: named, not_applicable: true, why: binding } + proposals: + - { type: slot-asserted, payload: slot-assertion } + +patterns: + preamble: Patterns fire on nodes. + items: + - { id: P01, on: [step], when: a step is an event, ask: ask how often } + - { id: P02, on: [thing], when: more than one thing competes, ask: ask which wins } + - { id: P03, on: [], when: the expert says they do not know, ask: ask for a source } + +guidance: + lenses: + - { name: fixture lens, text: Notice things. } + techniques: [] + movements: + slice: [] + sweep: + - { name: fixture sweep, text: Sweep the things. } + licenses: [] + motifs: [] + smells: [] + rabbit_holes: [] + failure_modes: + - { name: fixture failure, text: It failed., signature: it says so } + +runbooks: + construct: + kickoff: + - { name: fixture kickoff, text: Ask the question first. } + trajectory: [] + close: [] + +machinery: + checks: [slot-assertion] + tools: [] `; -export const fixturePluginFile = (): PluginFile => - parsePluginFile(FIXTURE_PLUGIN_MARKDOWN); +export const fixturePluginDefinition = (): PluginDefinition => + readPluginDefinition(FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML); export interface CaptureOptions { readonly status?: "explicit" | "inferred" | "tentative"; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fb7ffdbb545 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@ +# The gherkin plugin definition (ADR-0006, ADR-0007). +# +# Keys are owned by the harness; see `packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json` +# and `docs/adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md`. +# This is the tracer plugin: it exists to prove that a second formalism, with a +# different anchor and a different model shape, fits the same keys without +# the keys bending toward process modelling. Cells are filled only where the +# formalism has something to say; a blank cell means the harness default is +# the whole of the guidance. + +plugin: + id: gherkin + version: gherkin/2026-08-25.1 + formalism: Gherkin — executable specifications as features, rules, and examples + jobs: [construct, review-and-revise] + purpose: | + Interview someone who knows how a piece of behaviour should work, and leave + with a feature specification they would sign: what the feature is for, the + rules it obeys, and for every rule at least one concrete example — a + context, an action, and an observable outcome — written in words the + person who gave them would recognise. + +ontology: + preamble: | + The specification is a tree: a feature has rules, a rule has examples, an + example has steps. Structure comes from the person's account of what the + behaviour does, never from a template. The steps are the only place the + words are constrained — each step phrase should bind to a step the team + already knows, or be flagged as new. + kinds: + - kind: feature + is: One capability, described by whom it is for, what it lets them do, and why that matters. + projects_to: a Feature with its narrative + - kind: rule + is: One business rule the feature obeys, stated generally, that examples then illustrate. + projects_to: a Rule block + - kind: example + is: One concrete instance of a rule — a context, an action, and the outcome that follows. + projects_to: a Scenario or Example under its Rule + - kind: step + is: One line of an example — a Given, When, or Then — in the team's step vocabulary. + projects_to: a step line bound to a step definition + not_kinds: + - name: background + text: A shared context is not a node; it is a context step that several examples repeat. Record it on each example and let the projection factor it. + - name: tag + text: Tags are how a team organises and selects features; they carry no behaviour and are not elicited. + - name: step definition + text: The code that binds a step phrase is the team's, not the interview's. The interview only needs to know whether a phrase is already known. + attributes: + - name: status + on: rule and example + values: [current, proposed] + text: Whether the behaviour exists today or is what the person wants to be true. + +schema: + preamble: | + An example is usable only when someone who has never seen the system could + read its three parts and tell whether the system passed. "The user logs in + and it works" is a story, not an example. + anchor: + kind: feature + depends_on: the rules and examples it covers + floor: + - { kind: feature, at_least: 1 } + - { kind: example, at_least: 1 } + must_know: + - kind: feature + slot: the narrative + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: false + why: Who the capability is for, what it lets them do, and why — everything below is relative to it. + - kind: feature + slot: the rules and examples it covers + precision: at least 1 + not_applicable: false + why: The anchor's slice — what completion is measured over. + - kind: rule + slot: the statement + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: false + why: A rule that cannot be stated generally cannot be checked by an example. + - kind: rule + slot: the examples that illustrate it + precision: at least 1 + not_applicable: false + why: A rule without an example is an opinion; an example is what gets checked. + - kind: example + slot: the context it starts from + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: false + why: The Given — without it the outcome cannot be reproduced. + - kind: example + slot: the action taken + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: false + why: The When — one action, so the outcome has one cause. + - kind: example + slot: the observable outcome + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: false + why: The Then — something a reader could see or measure, not an intention. + - kind: example + slot: the rule it illustrates + precision: named + not_applicable: true + why: Ties the example to the rule it checks; an example may hang directly off the feature. + - kind: step + slot: the phrase + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: false + why: The line as it will be written. + - kind: step + slot: the known step it binds to + precision: named + not_applicable: true + why: A phrase the team already automates needs no new code; a new phrase is a cost the person should know about. + proposals: + - { type: statement-noted, payload: statement } + +patterns: + preamble: | + Patterns fire on nodes the harness holds. Each names the situation and the + question that resolves it; it does not schedule the question. + items: + - id: P01 + on: [rule] + when: a rule has a statement but no example. + ask: Ask for the last time this rule mattered — what was the situation, what happened, what was seen. + - id: P02 + on: [example] + when: two examples share a context and an action but differ in outcome. + ask: Ask what distinguishes the two situations; the difference is a missing part of the context or a missing rule. + - id: P03 + on: [example] + when: an outcome is stated as an intention ("should work", "is handled") rather than something observable. + ask: Ask what someone watching would see, and where. + - id: P04 + on: [step] + when: a step phrase resembles a known step but is not identical. + ask: Ask whether this is the same thing as the known step, or a different one; record which. + +guidance: + lenses: + - name: Rules hide in "always" and "never" + text: When the person says "we always", "it never", "whenever", or "unless", a rule is being stated in passing. Capture it as a rule and return to it for an example. + - name: Examples hide in stories + text: '"Last week", "for instance", "one customer" — a concrete case is being offered. It is worth more than a general statement; keep the details.' + techniques: + - name: Concretise + text: Turn a general statement into one example with specific values — a named context, one action, one outcome. Ask for the values; do not supply them. + - name: Contrast + text: For every rule, ask for the case where it does not hold. The contrasting example is what separates the rule from a coincidence. + movements: + slice: + - name: One example end to end + text: Take one concrete case through context, action, and outcome before touching another. The structure of the feature — its rules — comes from what the cases have in common. + sweep: + - name: Every rule has an example + text: Walk the rules and ask, for each without an example, for one. + - name: Every outcome is observable + text: Walk the examples and check each outcome names something a reader could see. + licenses: [] + motifs: + - name: Happy path and unhappy path + text: A rule usually has one example where it is satisfied and one where it is violated; ask whether the pair exists. + - name: Boundary + text: A rule with a threshold has an example at the threshold, just under, and just over; ask which of the three the person cares about. + - name: State-dependent outcome + text: The same action with a different outcome in a different state — the state belongs in the context. + smells: + - name: Two actions in one example + text: An example with two Whens has two causes for its outcome; split it. + - name: Outcome restates the action + text: '"When I save, then it is saved" checks nothing; ask what changes that someone could see.' + - name: Steps in gestures + text: Steps written as clicks and fields describe an interface, not behaviour; ask what the person is trying to do. + rabbit_holes: + - name: Writing the automation + text: Step definitions, fixtures, and test data are the team's work after the interview; do not design them here. + - name: Organising the suite + text: Tags, file layout, and naming conventions are not behaviour. + failure_modes: + - name: Rule without example + text: A general statement is recorded as if it were checkable. + signature: A rule node whose examples slot is unsatisfied at close. + - name: Untethered example + text: An example illustrates no stated rule and no one knows what it proves. + signature: An example whose rule slot is neither named nor marked not applicable. + - name: Contradiction + text: Two examples with the same context and action and different outcomes are both recorded. + signature: P02 fires and the session closes without a distinguishing context or a new rule. + +runbooks: + construct: + kickoff: + - name: Narrative first + text: Establish who the feature is for and what it lets them do before any rule; every rule is relative to it. + trajectory: + - name: Rule, then example, then contrast + text: For each rule as it surfaces, get one example, then the contrasting one; sweep for examples only after the slice has produced the rules. + close: + - name: Read the examples back + text: Read each example as it will be written and ask whether the person would sign it; list rules still without an example. + review-and-revise: + kickoff: + - name: Which rule changed + text: Establish whether the change is to a rule's statement, to an example, or to the feature's narrative; the affected slice follows from that. + trajectory: + - name: Re-check contradiction + text: After a change to an example, check P02 across the rule it illustrates before anything else. + close: [] + +machinery: + checks: + [parse-validity, step-lexicon-binding, rule-has-example, contradiction] + tools: [] diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/src/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/src/index.ts index 4503996a656..42b231ac254 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/src/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/src/index.ts @@ -2,8 +2,12 @@ * `@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-gherkin` — the gherkin target formalism (spec §13.1). * * The tracer target: cheap enough to wire end-to-end first, and deliberately - * trivial, so it must not be the plugin that freezes the contract (spec §13's - * two-targets-on-each-axis rule). Its packs, `project`, and `validate` land + * different in shape from the process-model plugin, so that the plugin + * contract is co-authored against two formalisms and freezes toward neither + * (spec §13's two-targets-on-each-axis rule; ADR-0007 decision 9). Its + * definition is `plugin.yaml` — a feature-anchored tree of rules, examples, + * and steps under the same harness-owned keys as every plugin. Its proposal + * stays at the verbatim floor in this cycle; `project` and `validate` land * with their own slice. * * **This package resolves `@hashintel/brunch-agent` and nothing else** — never the binding, @@ -13,7 +17,9 @@ import * as v from "valibot"; -import { definePlugin } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent"; +import { definePlugin, readPluginDefinition } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent"; + +import pluginYaml from "../plugin.yaml?raw"; const nonEmptyString = v.pipe(v.string(), v.nonEmpty()); const evidenceQuote = v.strictObject({ excerpt: nonEmptyString }); @@ -44,9 +50,13 @@ export type StatementNotedProposalInput = v.InferInput< typeof StatementNotedProposal >; +/** The plugin definition; reading fails loudly at module load if the contract is broken. */ +export const gherkinDefinition = readPluginDefinition(pluginYaml); + export const gherkin = definePlugin({ name: "plugin-gherkin", targetFormalism: "gherkin", + definition: gherkinDefinition, proposalCatalog: [ { name: "statement-noted", diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/src/raw-imports.d.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/src/raw-imports.d.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d6729bb002e --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/src/raw-imports.d.ts @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +/** Vite's `?raw` import: the plugin definition ships inside the bundle as a string. */ +declare module "*.yaml?raw" { + const yaml: string; + export default yaml; +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json index 83aa055929b..78489fed6e6 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ "name": "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn", "version": "0.0.0-private", "private": true, - "description": "The SDCPN target formalism: the process-model plugin file and its slot-assertion proposal type.", + "description": "The SDCPN target formalism: the process-model plugin definition and its slot-assertion proposal type.", "license": "AGPL-3.0", "type": "module", "exports": { diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md deleted file mode 100644 index e2491054b7b..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,273 +0,0 @@ -# SDCPN process model — the plugin file - -Plugin: `sdcpn` (the IR spec's "CPS plugin", Layer B) · Target formalism: stochastic dynamic -coloured Petri nets (Petrinaut) · Version: `sdcpn/2026-08-25.1` - -> **What this file is.** This is the plugin — the one authored artifact for this target. The -> headings are the contract and are fixed across all plugins; the content under them belongs to -> this formalism. The harness parses three tables (`## Kinds`, `## Must know`, `## Patterns`) into -> the model vocabulary, the demand list, and the pattern index; every other section is -> concatenated into the interviewer's instructions. The end user never edits this file — they -> have a conversation. -> -> It merges two existing sources into one artifact: the kind vocabulary and completion rule of -> [the IR spec's Layer B](../../docs/specs/intermediate-representation.md#layer-b--the-cps-plugins-ir), and the -> interviewing guidance of the condition-2 v0 prompt. Nothing here is new design; the domain-keyed -> demand tables and cards of FE-1402/1403/1404 are the departure this file walks back. -> -> **Domain-neutrality rule.** Nothing below may name a domain. What the user wants to model is -> unknown until the conversation starts; the same file must serve any operational system -> unchanged. A new case that seems to need a new row is a finding about the abstraction to be -> decided, never content to be added here. -> -> It lives at `packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.md` and is parsed by the harness's `parsePluginFile`; -> the package's `slot-asserted` proposal type is restricted to the kinds and slots below. - -## Purpose - -Interview someone who knows an operational system deeply — but is not a modeller — and derive a -process model that a simulation can run. The model must answer the questions the user actually -has, to the depth those questions need, in the expert's own vocabulary, with every value traceable -to something the expert said. Where the expert's knowledge stops, the model says so instead of -guessing. - -The interviewer does not build the net. It elicits the model at the expert's granularity; the -plugin's projection derives the SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar, and the loss report -from the model afterwards. Steps become transitions and the states between them become places -*in projection*, never in the conversation. - -## Kinds - -The model is a graph of nodes. Every node has exactly one kind. Kinds are the vocabulary of any -discrete-event process, not of any domain. Kinds 1–6 are net-bearing; 7–10 are partly or wholly -IR-only — the net is one projection of the model, and what the net cannot hold is kept with -provenance and named in the loss report. - -| # | kind | what it is | projects to | -| --- | ---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | -| 1 | `entity-type` | A kind of thing that flows through, is operated on, or does the work — and the distinctions the process treats differently, including state that rides along. | colours, typed elements | -| 2 | `boundary-condition` | What the system starts with and what reaches it from outside: initial populations, arrivals and departures, calendars, external inputs and their reliability. | scenario initial state and parameters, source transitions | -| 3 | `activity` | Something that happens, as the expert states it: a work step, a setup, a repair, an inspection, a hand-off, an interruption — with its actors, preconditions, outcomes, and duration. | factored transitions and the places between them | -| 4 | `ordering/flow` | How activities relate: sequence, branching, merging, triggers. | arcs, arc types, guards | -| 5 | `policy` | The rule applied when more than one thing could happen: who wins a contended resource, what goes next, when to switch, when to release. | guards and priorities where compilable; otherwise IR-only | -| 6 | `dynamics` | A quantity that evolves continuously while nothing discrete happens: wear, temperature, level, charge. | differential equations on real-valued colour elements | -| 7 | `objective` | A question the model must answer or a decision it must inform; what "better" means; trade-off weights. | metrics where scalar over simulation state; weights IR-only | -| 8 | `constraint` | A limit that must hold: capacity, eligibility, compatibility, qualification, a regulatory or quality rule — written or unwritten; conservation laws. | guards and capacities partially; otherwise IR-only | -| 9 | `data-binding` | A model variable that a real data feed could drive. | nothing today | -| 10 | `validation-criterion` | How the expert would know the model is right. | nothing today | - -Three things that look like kinds are not: - -- A **resource** (a machine, a team, a vehicle, a bay) is an `entity-type` whose instances are - contended for. Its contention rule is a `policy`; its capacity is a `constraint`; its - availability is a `boundary-condition`. -- A **queue, buffer, or waiting state** is not elicited as a node. It is implied by the activities - on either side of it and emerges as a place in projection. -- A **scenario** is not elicited; it is assembled at simulation time from `boundary-condition` - nodes. - -### Attributes on every kind - -- **quantity** — any duration, rate, probability, count, or capacity, on any kind. Elicited by - quantiles: "typical?", "one time in ten, worse than?", "one time in ten, better than?" — never - minimum / most-likely / maximum, which yields overconfident triangles. -- **source-regime** — `prescribed | practiced`, on any kind. One model, not two: when the manual - and the floor disagree, both are recorded on the same node and the divergence is an ordinary - typed conflict for the expert to resolve — elicitation gold, not an error. -- **rationale** — why the expert says it is so, on any kind, never only on objectives. - -## Must know - -For every node the conversation discovers, its kind decides what must be known about it and how -precisely. These rows never change when the domain changes: a repair on one kind of machine and a -repair on another are the same rows instantiated on different nodes. - -A slot is satisfied only when (a) it has reached the demanded precision and (b) the value comes -from the expert — stated outright, or inferred by the interviewer and confirmed by the expert. -Anything the interviewer supplied without confirmation belongs in the assumption ledger, not the -model. "Not mentioned" never satisfies a slot. "I don't know" and "we'll measure it later" are not -values. An explicit "not applicable" or "never happens" *is* a value where the row allows it. - -| kind | slot | precision | "not applicable" allowed | why the model needs it | -| ---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -| `objective` | the question, in the expert's words | spelled out | no | everything else is elicited relative to it | -| `objective` | the nodes it depends on | at least 1 | no | an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported by the model | -| `objective` | what "better" means, and trade-off weights | range | yes | quantified objectives need a metric; some are qualitative | -| `entity-type` | the distinctions the process treats apart | spelled out | no | two things are one type only if the process treats them the same everywhere | -| `entity-type` | state that rides along with each instance | spelled out | yes | colour elements; many types carry none | -| `entity-type` | how many there are, or the population's shape | range | yes | initial populations for contended resources; unbounded is an allowed answer | -| `boundary-condition` | the starting state | spelled out | no | scenario initial state | -| `boundary-condition` | the arrival or availability pattern | spread | no | source rates and calendars; a single average hides the shape | -| `activity` | what it needs before it can start | spelled out | no | transition preconditions | -| `activity` | what it produces or changes | spelled out | no | transition outcomes | -| `activity` | who or what performs it | named | yes | resource binding; some activities are unattended | -| `activity` | how long it takes | spread | no | duration distribution; a point value simulates as a falsehood | -| `activity` | how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step | range | yes | interruptions, failures, and arrivals have a rate; steps in the flow do not | -| `activity` | what is lost when it changes the system's mode | range | yes | setup, changeover, restart, and warm-up losses are routinely never asked | -| `activity` | whether its quantities vary by type | named | no | the answer is load-bearing either way | -| `ordering/flow` | the order things happen in | spelled out | no | the net's structure | -| `ordering/flow` | how a branch or merge is decided | spelled out | yes | routing; only where the flow branches | -| `policy` | the rule as actually practiced | spelled out | no | guards and priorities; the tacit rule, not the poster on the wall | -| `policy` | what overrides it | spelled out | yes | exceptions are where the simulation and reality diverge | -| `dynamics` | what changes, in which direction, at what rate | range | no | the differential law; a direction with no rate cannot be simulated | -| `dynamics` | what happens at a threshold | spelled out | yes | most continuous quantities exist to trigger something | -| `constraint` | the limit and what happens when it is hit | spelled out | no | a capacity without a consequence cannot be simulated | -| `data-binding` | the variable and its feed | named | yes | IR-only today; recorded so the loss report can name it | -| `validation-criterion` | how the expert would know the model is right | spelled out | yes | IR-only; anchors the acceptance conversation | - -Static floor — before objective-relative depth counts at all, the model must contain at least one -`objective`, at least two `entity-type` nodes, at least one `activity`, and at least one -`ordering/flow` whose order is spelled out. Presence is a count; the floor assigns no precision. - -Completion is question-relative: the model is complete when the floor holds and every node in the -dependency slice of every active `objective` satisfies its kind's rows. Nodes outside every slice -are recorded but not demanded. Completion is a boolean plus the list of what fails and why; it is -computed from the model, never from the conversation. - -### Precision words - -| word | means | IR grade | -| ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------- | -| `named` | identified in words | verbal | -| `number` | a single figure with its unit | point | -| `range` | an ordinary low and high | range | -| `spread` | range plus "typical", plus one-in-ten worse and one-in-ten better (or median and quartiles) | quantiles | -| `spelled out` | the rule, pattern, list, or structure itself, in a form a second reader could apply without asking | structured | -| `at least N` | a count of nodes present | presence | - -Precision says how much a value narrows what it could mean. It says nothing about where the value -came from: "about three hours" from the expert is an honest `number` at the wrong precision; "three -hours" invented by the interviewer is at the right precision and is not evidence at all. The two -are tracked separately and neither substitutes for the other. - -## Patterns - -Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that -resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces -a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer -decides whether and how to use it. - -| id | when | ask | -| --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -| P01 | an `activity` is an event that can befall the system — a failure, an interruption, an unplanned arrival — rather than a step in the flow | occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never round a range up to a spread. | -| P02 | an `activity` changes the system's mode — a setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, reconfiguration, handover | ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert "unknown" into a value. | -| P03 | an `ordering/flow` moves things in groups — batches, runs, lots, loads | ask what the group is, the smallest sensible one, whether a group must stay together, and what an extra split costs (extra mode changes, extra loss) on the activities it touches. | -| P04 | a `policy` or `boundary-condition` gates when something may proceed — a release, a start, an admission | replace any time-shaped approximation ("about two days before") with the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable. | -| P05 | more than one thing can want the same `entity-type` instance at once | ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document. | -| P06 | the expert answers with a vague quantifier — "usually", "roughly", "mostly", "sometimes" | each hides a distribution or an exception. Ask for the last time it happened, then for the spread. | -| P07 | a quantity has been given for one `entity-type` and others exist | ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record "no" as a value; it is load-bearing. | -| P08 | any node has both a prescribed and a practiced form | record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one. | -| P09 | the sweep of `constraint` nodes is otherwise complete | ask for the unwritten ones: "what would a newcomer get wrong in the first week?", "what do you always or never do that is written nowhere?", "which rule exists because something once went wrong?" | -| P10 | a slot is unsatisfied and the expert has said they do not know | "don't know" is not a value and not an absence. Ask what the least burdensome authoritative source would be, record the slot as open with that pointer, and move on. | -| P11 | a topic's sweep is ending | ask for absences explicitly: "is there anything here that never happens?" An explicit "never" is a value. Do not ask the expert what you have failed to ask; finding that is the harness's job. | -| P12 | the harness reports a slot as below precision or an objective as unsupported | name the node, what is known so far, what precision is needed, and ask for the smallest delta that would satisfy it. Do not restate the whole model. | -| P13 | a `dynamics` node has been named | ask what it triggers when it crosses a threshold, and which `activity` resets it. A continuous quantity that triggers nothing usually does not need to be in the model. | - -## Moves - -Moves are the mandates: the shape a conversation follows regardless of domain. A plugin carries one -runbook per **job** it supports; every runbook works over the same `Kinds` and `Must know` tables -and differs only in kickoff, trajectory, checks, and stopping. This plugin supports two jobs. The -harness enforces what it can (completion, the sweep list, the ledger, the affected slice); the -interviewer is responsible for the rest. - -### Job: construct - -Kickoff: no model exists. The user knows the system; the interviewer knows the kinds. - -1. **Open with objectives.** Before anything about structure, establish what the user wants the - model to answer or decide. Capture each as an `objective` node. Expect to co-construct: these - are almost never written down. Ask what "better" means and whether it can be quantified. - Everything afterwards is elicited relative to these nodes. - -2. **Slice.** Walk one concrete case end to end ("take one instance from arriving to leaving") to - expose the structure. Create nodes as they appear. As each `objective` becomes clearer, link it - to the nodes it depends on. An objective that depends on nothing yet is unsupported — say so - and go find its structure. This is where the model's shape comes from; do not sweep before it. - -3. **Sweep.** For every node the slice revealed, in kind order, check each of its `Must know` - slots and every pattern whose trigger it matches. This is the move that finds what was never - asked: completion can only judge what is in the model, and the sweep is what puts things in it. - Group two to four related questions per turn while sweeping; probe one thread at a time when - something needs depth. - -4. **Probe.** Do not settle for the first answer. Follow vague terms (P06). Ask for stories rather - than generalisations. When two answers tension against each other, say so and ask which holds. - Ask for the smallest delta that would move a slot to its demanded precision (P12), not for - everything at once. - -5. **Keep the ledger.** Every value or rule the interviewer supplied and the expert did not - confirm — defaults, simplifications, placeholders — goes in a numbered assumption ledger with - why it was assumed and how to check it. It never enters the model silently. - -6. **Close honestly.** Completion is computed by the harness from the model, not felt from the - conversation. A smooth interview, a busy expert, a delivered document, an exhausted budget, and - a complete model are five different things; never let one stand in for another. If the expert - has to stop, stop: open no new topic, state what the model can now support and what is still - missing, and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once every active objective's slice - meets its demands. Before delivering, summarise per kind, state what is missing or assumed, - and give the expert one chance to correct you. - -### Job: review and revise - -Kickoff: a model already exists, with its captures and a projected net. The reviewer may not be -the original source. They arrive with an element of the net or a region of the model in view and -one of three intents: understand why it is modelled as it is, correct it, or extend it. The -engagement brief is the selected element, the intent, and nothing else; the interviewer does not -reopen the interview. - -1. **Orient on the artifact, not the conversation.** State which model node and slot the selected - net element projects from, and which captures support that slot — turn, speaker, quote, grade, - source-regime. This is the only admissible answer to "why is X modelled like Y": provenance, - never domain plausibility. If no capture supports the element, say so plainly: it is an - assumption in the ledger or a projection default, and the reviewer is looking at a gap, not at - knowledge. - -2. **Scope before eliciting.** The harness computes the affected slice: the node, its slots, every - `objective` whose dependency slice contains it, and every projected element those produce. State - the scope to the reviewer in one sentence. Nothing outside it will change; if the reviewer's - intent reaches outside it, say so and let them widen the scope explicitly. - -3. **Elicit the correction in three to five turns.** Apply the node's `Must know` rows and any - pattern its state triggers — P12 first: what is known, what precision is needed, the smallest - delta. The reviewer's statement is evidence at the precision actually given. A correction is a - new capture that **supersedes** the old one — single hop, active head — never an edit of it. If - the reviewer contradicts the original source rather than refining it, that is a conflict: record - both, name it, and ask the reviewer to resolve it explicitly before anything supersedes. - -4. **Re-evaluate the slice only.** Completion is recomputed over the affected objectives. Report - what moved: a slot that gained or lost precision, an objective newly supported or newly - unsupported, a conflict opened or closed. Do not report the rest of the model. - -5. **Project the delta.** Projection re-runs over the whole model, deterministically. The expected - delta is confined to the scope; show the reviewer which net elements changed, which are - unchanged, and which code obligations the change reopened. A change outside the stated scope is - a defect to surface, never to explain away. - -6. **Hand off.** State what changed, what each change traces to, which obligations remain open, - and that unrelated regions are unchanged. Stop when the reviewer's stated correction is captured - and projected, or when five turns pass without a superseding capture — say which, and do not - loop. Stopping outcomes are distinct and named: `corrected-and-projected`, - `corrected-obligation-open`, `conflict-unresolved`, `scope-exceeded`, `reviewer-stopped`. - -Checks the harness owns for this job: every changed net element traces to a superseding capture -made in this session; no capture outside the scope changed; the projection outside the scope is -identical before and after; the ledger records any default the correction displaced. - -## Deliverable - -When the interview ends — complete or not — produce: - -1. the model, every node in the expert's own vocabulary, with each slot's value and precision as - actually obtained and its source-regime where both were given; -2. the assumption ledger; -3. a loss section: what the model deliberately leaves out, which slots are open and why, which - objectives are unsupported, and which kinds the net cannot carry. - -For the review-and-revise job the deliverable is the **delta report** in place of the whole model: -the superseding captures made, the slots and objectives whose state moved, the net elements -changed and the elements confirmed unchanged, the obligations reopened, and the stopping outcome. - -The SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar, and the typed loss report are derived from the -model by the plugin's projection; the interviewer does not write them and must not claim the model -is loadable, compiled, or simulated. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c8db0f5338b --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,489 @@ +# The SDCPN plugin — authored under the harness-owned keys of ADR-0007. +# +# Every key below is defined and taught by the harness; this file specialises each for one target +# formalism. Cells add to the harness default and never override it; a cell left blank means the +# default suffices. Nothing here may name a domain: the same file must serve any operational +# system unchanged. A case that seems to need a new row or a new key is a finding about the +# abstraction, recorded in the schema changelog, never content added here. +# +# Migrated from plugin.md (sdcpn/2026-08-25.1) with no semantic change to the three tables. The +# guidance the v0 prompt contributed — open with objectives, slice then sweep, probe, keep the +# ledger, close honestly — has moved to the repertoire (packages/repertoire), where every plugin +# inherits it; what remains here is what is true of this formalism and not of interviewing. + +plugin: + id: sdcpn + version: sdcpn/2026-08-25.2 + formalism: stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (Petrinaut) + jobs: [construct, review-and-revise] + purpose: | + Interview someone who knows an operational system deeply — but is not a modeller — and derive a + process model that a simulation can run. The model must answer the questions the user actually + has, to the depth those questions need, in the expert's own vocabulary, with every value + traceable to something the expert said. Where the expert's knowledge stops, the model says so + instead of guessing. + + The interviewer does not build the net. It elicits the model at the expert's granularity; the + plugin's projection derives the SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar, and the loss report + from the model afterwards. Steps become transitions and the states between them become places + *in projection*, never in the conversation. + +# ─── Contract data ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── + +ontology: + preamble: | + The model is a graph of nodes. Every node has exactly one kind. Kinds are the vocabulary of any + discrete-event process, not of any domain. Kinds 1–6 are net-bearing; 7–10 are partly or wholly + IR-only — the net is one projection of the model, and what the net cannot hold is kept with + provenance and named in the loss report. + kinds: + - kind: entity-type + is: >- + A kind of thing that flows through, is operated on, or does the work — and the distinctions + the process treats differently, including state that rides along. + projects_to: colours, typed elements + - kind: boundary-condition + is: >- + What the system starts with and what reaches it from outside: initial populations, arrivals + and departures, calendars, external inputs and their reliability. + projects_to: scenario initial state and parameters, source transitions + - kind: activity + is: >- + Something that happens, as the expert states it: a work step, a setup, a repair, an + inspection, a hand-off, an interruption — with its actors, preconditions, outcomes, and + duration. + projects_to: factored transitions and the places between them + - kind: ordering/flow + is: "How activities relate: sequence, branching, merging, triggers." + projects_to: arcs, arc types, guards + - kind: policy + is: >- + The rule applied when more than one thing could happen: who wins a contended resource, what + goes next, when to switch, when to release. + projects_to: guards and priorities where compilable; otherwise IR-only + - kind: dynamics + is: "A quantity that evolves continuously while nothing discrete happens: wear, temperature, level, charge." + projects_to: differential equations on real-valued colour elements + - kind: objective + is: >- + A question the model must answer or a decision it must inform; what "better" means; + trade-off weights. + projects_to: metrics where scalar over simulation state; weights IR-only + - kind: constraint + is: >- + A limit that must hold: capacity, eligibility, compatibility, qualification, a regulatory or + quality rule — written or unwritten; conservation laws. + projects_to: guards and capacities partially; otherwise IR-only + - kind: data-binding + is: A model variable that a real data feed could drive. + projects_to: nothing today + - kind: validation-criterion + is: How the expert would know the model is right. + projects_to: nothing today + not_kinds: + - name: resource + text: >- + A resource (a machine, a team, a vehicle, a bay) is an `entity-type` whose instances are + contended for. Its contention rule is a `policy`; its capacity is a `constraint`; its + availability is a `boundary-condition`. + - name: queue, buffer, or waiting state + text: >- + Not elicited as a node. It is implied by the activities on either side of it and emerges as + a place in projection. + - name: scenario + text: Not elicited; it is assembled at simulation time from `boundary-condition` nodes. + attributes: + - name: quantity + on: any kind + text: >- + Any duration, rate, probability, count, or capacity. Elicited by quantiles — "typical?", + "one time in ten, worse than?", "one time in ten, better than?" — never minimum / + most-likely / maximum, which yields overconfident triangles. + - name: source-regime + on: any kind + values: [prescribed, practiced] + text: >- + One model, not two: when the manual and the floor disagree, both are recorded on the same + node and the divergence is an ordinary typed conflict for the expert to resolve — + elicitation gold, not an error. + - name: rationale + on: any kind + text: Why the expert says it is so — on any kind, never only on objectives. + +schema: + preamble: | + For every node the conversation discovers, its kind decides what must be known about it and how + precisely. These rows never change when the domain changes: a repair on one kind of machine and + a repair on another are the same rows instantiated on different nodes. + anchor: + kind: objective + depends_on: the nodes it depends on + floor: + - { kind: objective, at_least: 1 } + - { kind: entity-type, at_least: 2 } + - { kind: activity, at_least: 1 } + - { kind: ordering/flow, at_least: 1 } + must_know: + - kind: objective + slot: "the question, in the expert's words" + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: false + why: "everything else is elicited relative to it" + - kind: objective + slot: "the nodes it depends on" + precision: at least 1 + not_applicable: false + why: "an objective that depends on nothing is unsupported by the model" + - kind: objective + slot: 'what "better" means, and trade-off weights' + precision: range + not_applicable: true + why: "quantified objectives need a metric; some are qualitative" + - kind: entity-type + slot: "the distinctions the process treats apart" + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: false + why: "two things are one type only if the process treats them the same everywhere" + - kind: entity-type + slot: "state that rides along with each instance" + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: true + why: "colour elements; many types carry none" + - kind: entity-type + slot: "how many there are, or the population's shape" + precision: range + not_applicable: true + why: "initial populations for contended resources; unbounded is an allowed answer" + - kind: boundary-condition + slot: "the starting state" + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: false + why: "scenario initial state" + - kind: boundary-condition + slot: "the arrival or availability pattern" + precision: spread + not_applicable: false + why: "source rates and calendars; a single average hides the shape" + - kind: activity + slot: "what it needs before it can start" + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: false + why: "transition preconditions" + - kind: activity + slot: "what it produces or changes" + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: false + why: "transition outcomes" + - kind: activity + slot: "who or what performs it" + precision: named + not_applicable: true + why: "resource binding; some activities are unattended" + - kind: activity + slot: "how long it takes" + precision: spread + not_applicable: false + why: "duration distribution; a point value simulates as a falsehood" + - kind: activity + slot: "how often it occurs, if it is an event rather than a step" + precision: range + not_applicable: true + why: "interruptions, failures, and arrivals have a rate; steps in the flow do not" + - kind: activity + slot: "what is lost when it changes the system's mode" + precision: range + not_applicable: true + why: "setup, changeover, restart, and warm-up losses are routinely never asked" + - kind: activity + slot: "whether its quantities vary by type" + precision: named + not_applicable: false + why: "the answer is load-bearing either way" + - kind: ordering/flow + slot: "the order things happen in" + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: false + why: "the net's structure" + - kind: ordering/flow + slot: "how a branch or merge is decided" + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: true + why: "routing; only where the flow branches" + - kind: policy + slot: "the rule as actually practiced" + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: false + why: "guards and priorities; the tacit rule, not the poster on the wall" + - kind: policy + slot: "what overrides it" + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: true + why: "exceptions are where the simulation and reality diverge" + - kind: dynamics + slot: "what changes, in which direction, at what rate" + precision: range + not_applicable: false + why: "the differential law; a direction with no rate cannot be simulated" + - kind: dynamics + slot: "what happens at a threshold" + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: true + why: "most continuous quantities exist to trigger something" + - kind: constraint + slot: "the limit and what happens when it is hit" + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: false + why: "a capacity without a consequence cannot be simulated" + - kind: data-binding + slot: "the variable and its feed" + precision: named + not_applicable: true + why: "IR-only today; recorded so the loss report can name it" + - kind: validation-criterion + slot: "how the expert would know the model is right" + precision: spelled out + not_applicable: true + why: "IR-only; anchors the acceptance conversation" + proposals: + - type: slot-asserted + payload: slot-assertion + +patterns: + preamble: | + Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question + that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness + surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the + interviewer decides whether and how to use it. + items: + - id: P01 + on: [activity] + when: >- + an `activity` is an event that can befall the system — a failure, an interruption, an + unplanned arrival — rather than a step in the flow + ask: >- + occurrence and duration are two slots. Ask how often, as a range, for each named event + separately; then how long, as a spread. Keep the precision the expert actually gave; never + round a range up to a spread. + - id: P02 + on: [activity] + when: >- + an `activity` changes the system's mode — a setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, + reconfiguration, handover + ask: >- + ask what is lost in the transition, as a range, after a *named* transition. If the expert + does not know, ask what they would treat as an authoritative source — never convert + "unknown" into a value. + - id: P03 + on: [ordering/flow] + when: an `ordering/flow` moves things in groups — batches, runs, lots, loads + ask: >- + ask what the group is, the smallest sensible one, whether a group must stay together, and + what an extra split costs (extra mode changes, extra loss) on the activities it touches. + - id: P04 + on: [policy, boundary-condition] + when: >- + a `policy` or `boundary-condition` gates when something may proceed — a release, a start, an + admission + ask: >- + replace any time-shaped approximation ("about two days before") with the practiced event or + state that makes it runnable, who or what flips it, and where that is observable. + - id: P05 + on: [entity-type] + when: more than one thing can want the same `entity-type` instance at once + ask: >- + ask which wins, what overrides that, how ties break, and for a recent borderline case that + shows the practiced rule. Never infer the rule from a schedule or a document. + - id: P07 + on: [entity-type] + when: a quantity has been given for one `entity-type` and others exist + ask: ask explicitly whether it varies by type. Record "no" as a value; it is load-bearing. + - id: P08 + on: [] + when: any node has both a prescribed and a practiced form + ask: >- + record both on the same node under `source-regime`, with the expert's account of when they + diverge. Do not average them and do not pick one. + - id: P13 + on: [dynamics] + when: a `dynamics` node has been named + ask: >- + ask what it triggers when it crosses a threshold, and which `activity` resets it. A + continuous quantity that triggers nothing usually does not need to be in the model. + +# ─── Guidance ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── +# Each cell adds to the harness default under the same key. Blank means the default suffices. + +guidance: + lenses: + - name: a resource named in passing + text: >- + A machine, team, vehicle, or bay mentioned as an aside is an `entity-type` whose instances + are contended for; the contention rule it implies is a `policy`, and it is usually the + expert's least-examined knowledge. + - name: '"it depends"' + text: >- + Hides either a branch in the `ordering/flow`, a `policy` deciding it, or a quantity that + varies by `entity-type`. Ask which before moving on. + - name: '"sometimes it breaks", "we have to wait for"' + text: >- + An event-shaped `activity` with a rate and a duration, or a `boundary-condition` the system + does not control. Both are routinely left out of a first account of the flow. + - name: warming up, wearing down, filling + text: >- + A `dynamics` node — something changing continuously while nothing discrete happens — or a + mode change with a loss. The expert rarely volunteers the rate; the model cannot run + without it. + techniques: + - name: quantiles, never triangles + text: >- + For any quantity, ask "typical?", then "one time in ten, worse than?", then "one time in + ten, better than?" — never minimum / most-likely / maximum, which yields overconfident + triangles. A `spread` is exactly this. + - name: precision is about the value, not its source + text: >- + "About three hours" from the expert is an honest `number` at the wrong precision; "three + hours" supplied by the interviewer is at the right precision and is not evidence at all. + Track both and let neither substitute for the other. + movements: + slice: + - name: one instance, arriving to leaving + text: >- + One case in this formalism is one instance of the `entity-type` that flows, followed from + the moment it reaches the system to the moment it leaves. Create nodes as they appear; as + each `objective` becomes clearer, link it to the nodes it depends on. An `objective` that + depends on nothing yet is unsupported — say so and go find its structure. + sweep: + - name: strata are kinds, net-bearing first + text: >- + A stratum is one kind. Sweep in kind order, `entity-type` through `dynamics` (net-bearing) + before `objective` through `validation-criterion` (partly or wholly IR-only). + - name: the unwritten constraints + text: >- + Close the `constraint` stratum with the unwritten rules: "what would a newcomer get wrong + in the first week?", "what do you always or never do that is written nowhere?", "which rule + exists because something once went wrong?" + licenses: [] + motifs: + - name: shared resource + text: several activities want one `entity-type`'s instances — ask which wins and what overrides. + - name: batch, lot, load + text: an `ordering/flow` that moves things in groups — ask what the group is and what a split costs. + - name: gate or release + text: a `policy` or `boundary-condition` that lets things proceed — ask for the practiced event, not the approximate time. + - name: mode change + text: a setup, changeover, restart, or warm-up — ask what is lost, after a named transition. + - name: event, not step + text: a failure or interruption that befalls the system — ask rate and duration separately. + - name: threshold on a continuous quantity + text: a `dynamics` node — ask what it triggers and which `activity` resets it. + smells: + - name: a quantity for one type and no other + text: given for one `entity-type` when others exist and never asked whether it varies (P07). + - name: a continuous quantity that triggers nothing + text: a `dynamics` node with no threshold and no consequence usually does not belong in the model. + - name: a queue as a node + text: a buffer or waiting state elicited as if it were an activity; it is implied and emerges in projection. + - name: a policy read off a document + text: the rule as posted taken for the rule as practiced; the practiced one is the slot. + - name: a point where a spread is demanded + text: a single average standing in for a duration or arrival pattern; it simulates as a falsehood. + - name: two regimes averaged + text: prescribed and practiced blended into one value instead of both recorded on the node. + rabbit_holes: + - name: building the net in conversation + text: >- + Places, transitions, arcs, and colours are projection output. Naming them to the expert + buys nothing and costs the expert's vocabulary. + - name: eliciting queues or scenarios + text: >- + Neither is a node. Ask about the activities on either side of a wait; assemble scenarios + from `boundary-condition` nodes at simulation time. + - name: depth on IR-only kinds + text: >- + `data-binding` and `validation-criterion` project to nothing today; name them and record + them for the loss report, do not elaborate them. + failure_modes: + - name: dead net + signature: no `ordering/flow` with its order spelled out; activities exist but nothing connects them + text: the floor catches presence; only the sweep catches an order that was never actually stated. + - name: unsupported objective + signature: an `objective` whose dependency slot names no node in the model + text: the model cannot answer the question it was built for; the slice never reached it. + - name: overconfident triangle + signature: a duration or rate captured as minimum / most-likely / maximum + text: the expert was asked the wrong three questions; re-ask as quantiles. + +# ─── Runbooks ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── +# One cell set per job this plugin supports. The harness default runbook for each job comes first; +# these cells add what is true of this formalism. + +runbooks: + construct: + kickoff: + - name: what "no model exists" means here + text: >- + The user knows the system; the interviewer knows the kinds. Capture each thing the user + wants the model to answer or decide as an `objective` node. Expect to co-construct: these + are almost never written down. Ask what "better" means and whether it can be quantified. + trajectory: + - name: kind order + text: >- + Slice one instance end to end first; the shape of the model comes from the slice. Then + sweep the nodes the slice revealed in kind order, net-bearing kinds before IR-only ones, + checking each node's rows and every pattern its state matches. + close: + - name: the deliverable + text: >- + Summarise per kind. Deliver the model with every node in the expert's own vocabulary, + each slot's value and precision as actually obtained and its source-regime where both were + given; the assumption ledger; and a loss section — what the model deliberately leaves + out, which slots are open and why, which objectives are unsupported, and which kinds the + net cannot carry. + - name: what the interviewer does not claim + text: >- + The SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar, and the typed loss report are derived by + the plugin's projection. The interviewer does not write them and must not claim the model + is loadable, compiled, or simulated. + review-and-revise: + kickoff: + - name: what "a model exists" means here + text: >- + A model with its captures and a projected net. The reviewer arrives with an element of + the net in view. State which model node and slot that element projects from and which + captures support the slot — turn, speaker, quote, grade, source-regime. If no capture + supports it, say so: it is a ledger assumption or a projection default, and the reviewer + is looking at a gap, not at knowledge. + trajectory: + - name: the affected slice in this formalism + text: >- + The scope the harness computes is the node, its slots, every `objective` whose dependency + slice contains it, and every projected net element those produce. Apply the node's rows + and the patterns its state triggers, smallest delta first. + - name: the delta in the net + text: >- + Projection re-runs over the whole model, deterministically. Show which net elements + changed, which are unchanged, and which code obligations the change reopened. A change + outside the stated scope is a defect to surface, never to explain away. + close: + - name: stopping outcomes + text: >- + Named and distinct: `corrected-and-projected`, `corrected-obligation-open`, + `conflict-unresolved`, `scope-exceeded`, `reviewer-stopped`. + - name: the delta report + text: >- + In place of the whole model: the superseding captures made, the slots and objectives + whose state moved, the net elements changed and the elements confirmed unchanged, the + obligations reopened, and the stopping outcome. + - name: before handing off, verify + text: >- + Every changed net element traces to a superseding capture made in this session; no capture + outside the scope changed; the projection outside the scope is identical before and after; + the ledger records any default the correction displaced. + +# ─── Machinery ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── +# Code, declared here and exported from src/. The harness enforces completion, the sweep list, the +# ledger, and the affected slice itself; those are not plugin machinery. + +machinery: + checks: [slot-assertion] + tools: [] diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/index.ts index ace73b5f290..ab23c7a868e 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/index.ts @@ -1,12 +1,13 @@ /** * `@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn` — the SDCPN target formalism (ADR-0006). * - * The plugin is `plugin.md`: one sectioned Markdown file whose three tables the - * harness parses into the model vocabulary, the demand list, and the pattern - * index, and whose prose becomes the interviewer's instructions. This module - * loads that file and declares the one proposal type a kind-and-slot plugin - * needs: a slot assertion addressed to a kind, node, and slot the file names. - * The file names no domain, and neither does this code. + * The plugin is `plugin.yaml`: data under the harness-owned keys (ADR-0007) + * whose contract keys the harness reads into the model vocabulary, the demand + * list, and the pattern index, and whose guidance and runbook cells specialise + * what the repertoire teaches. This module loads that definition and declares + * the one proposal type a kind-and-slot plugin needs: a slot assertion + * addressed to a kind, node, and slot the definition names. The definition + * names no domain, and neither does this code. * * **This package resolves `@hashintel/brunch-agent` and nothing else** — never the * binding, never Flue, and it is storage-blind (spec §9.6). `project` and @@ -18,19 +19,19 @@ import * as v from "valibot"; import { createSlotAssertionSchema, definePlugin, - parsePluginFile, + readPluginDefinition, } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent"; -import pluginMarkdown from "../plugin.md?raw"; +import pluginYaml from "../plugin.yaml?raw"; const nonEmptyString = v.pipe(v.string(), v.nonEmpty()); const evidenceQuote = v.strictObject({ excerpt: nonEmptyString }); -/** The parsed plugin file; parsing fails loudly at module load if the contract is broken. */ -export const sdcpnPluginFile = parsePluginFile(pluginMarkdown); +/** The plugin definition; reading fails loudly at module load if the contract is broken. */ +export const sdcpnDefinition = readPluginDefinition(pluginYaml); /** - * One slot assertion, quote-anchored, restricted to the file's kinds and slots. + * One slot assertion, quote-anchored, restricted to the definition's kinds and slots. * The harness resolves quotes to evidence spans at apply time; the proposal * carries excerpts only. */ @@ -39,7 +40,7 @@ export const SlotAssertedProposal = v.strictObject({ epistemicStatus: v.picklist(["explicit", "inferred", "tentative"]), confidence: v.picklist(["firm", "hedged", "speculative"]), content: v.strictObject({ - value: createSlotAssertionSchema(sdcpnPluginFile), + value: createSlotAssertionSchema(sdcpnDefinition), }), }); @@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ export type SlotAssertedProposalInput = v.InferInput< export const sdcpn = definePlugin({ name: "plugin-sdcpn", targetFormalism: "sdcpn", - file: sdcpnPluginFile, + definition: sdcpnDefinition, proposalCatalog: [ { name: "slot-asserted", diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/raw-imports.d.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/raw-imports.d.ts index 34796422eb2..d6729bb002e 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/raw-imports.d.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/raw-imports.d.ts @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -/** Vite's `?raw` import: the plugin file ships inside the bundle as a string. */ -declare module "*.md?raw" { - const markdown: string; - export default markdown; +/** Vite's `?raw` import: the plugin definition ships inside the bundle as a string. */ +declare module "*.yaml?raw" { + const yaml: string; + export default yaml; } diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/plugin.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/plugin.test.ts index 2d6fd7f828a..e591f4094d5 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/plugin.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/plugin.test.ts @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ import { type SlotAssertion, } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent"; -import { sdcpn, sdcpnPluginFile } from "../src/index"; +import { sdcpn, sdcpnDefinition } from "../src/index"; const proposalOf = (assertion: SlotAssertion) => ({ evidence: [{ excerpt: "quote" }], @@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ const capture = (assertion: SlotAssertion): CaptureEnvelope => { describe("the SDCPN plugin", () => { test("is the parsed file plus one slot-assertion proposal type", () => { expect(sdcpn.targetFormalism).toBe("sdcpn"); - expect(sdcpn.file).toBe(sdcpnPluginFile); - expect(sdcpnPluginFile.version).toBe("sdcpn/2026-08-25.1"); + expect(sdcpn.definition).toBe(sdcpnDefinition); + expect(sdcpnDefinition.version).toBe("sdcpn/2026-08-25.2"); expect(sdcpn.proposalCatalog.map((proposal) => proposal.name)).toEqual([ "slot-asserted", ]); @@ -256,12 +256,12 @@ describe("the SDCPN plugin", () => { ]; const model = foldElicitedModel( { captures, issues: [], events: [] }, - sdcpnPluginFile, + sdcpnDefinition, ); expect(model.unmapped).toEqual([]); const report = evaluateCompletion( model, - completionDemands(sdcpnPluginFile), + completionDemands(sdcpnDefinition), ); expect(report.failures).toEqual([]); expect(report.complete).toBe(true); @@ -270,9 +270,9 @@ describe("the SDCPN plugin", () => { const partial = evaluateCompletion( foldElicitedModel( { captures: withoutDuration, issues: [], events: [] }, - sdcpnPluginFile, + sdcpnDefinition, ), - completionDemands(sdcpnPluginFile), + completionDemands(sdcpnDefinition), ); expect(partial.complete).toBe(false); expect( diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/.oxlintrc.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/.oxlintrc.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6e0289507c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/.oxlintrc.json @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +{ + "$schema": "./node_modules/oxlint/configuration_schema.json", + "extends": ["../../../../../.config/oxlint/brunch/base.json"], + "categories": { + "correctness": "error", + "perf": "warn" + }, + "env": { + "builtin": true, + "es2026": true, + "node": true + }, + "options": { + "typeAware": true, + "typeCheck": true + }, + "rules": { + "no-restricted-imports": [ + "error", + { + "paths": [ + { + "name": "@hashintel/brunch-agent/storage", + "message": "The repertoire is text; it must remain storage-blind." + }, + { + "name": "@hashintel/petrinaut", + "message": "Brunch libraries must not depend on Petrinaut implementations." + } + ], + "patterns": [ + { + "group": ["@local/*"], + "message": "Brunch libraries must remain independent of unpublished HASH packages." + }, + { + "group": ["@hashintel/petrinaut/*", "@hashintel/petrinaut-*"], + "message": "Brunch libraries must not depend on Petrinaut implementations." + }, + { + "group": ["@flue/*", "@earendil-works/*"], + "message": "The repertoire is substrate-independent." + }, + { + "group": ["@hashintel/brunch-agent-*"], + "message": "The repertoire depends inward on the harness only." + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "ignorePatterns": [ + "dist/**", + "build/**", + "coverage/**", + "*.gen.*", + "*.tsbuildinfo", + ".turbo/**" + ] +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/LICENSE.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/LICENSE.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c7d627721e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/LICENSE.md @@ -0,0 +1,607 @@ +GNU Affero General Public License +================================= + +_Version 3, 19 November 2007_ +_Copyright © 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. <>_ + +Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies +of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. + +## Preamble + +The GNU Affero General Public License is a free, copyleft license for +software and other kinds of works, specifically designed to ensure +cooperation with the community in the case of network server software. + +The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed +to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, +our General Public Licenses are intended to guarantee your freedom to +share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free +software for all its users. + +When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not +price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you +have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for +them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you +want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new +free programs, and that you know you can do these things. + +Developers that use our General Public Licenses protect your rights +with two steps: **(1)** assert copyright on the software, and **(2)** offer +you this License which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute +and/or modify the software. + +A secondary benefit of defending all users' freedom is that +improvements made in alternate versions of the program, if they +receive widespread use, become available for other developers to +incorporate. Many developers of free software are heartened and +encouraged by the resulting cooperation. However, in the case of +software used on network servers, this result may fail to come about. +The GNU General Public License permits making a modified version and +letting the public access it on a server without ever releasing its +source code to the public. + +The GNU Affero General Public License is designed specifically to +ensure that, in such cases, the modified source code becomes available +to the community. It requires the operator of a network server to +provide the source code of the modified version running there to the +users of that server. Therefore, public use of a modified version, on +a publicly accessible server, gives the public access to the source +code of the modified version. + +An older license, called the Affero General Public License and +published by Affero, was designed to accomplish similar goals. This is +a different license, not a version of the Affero GPL, but Affero has +released a new version of the Affero GPL which permits relicensing under +this license. + +The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and +modification follow. + +## TERMS AND CONDITIONS + +### 0. Definitions + +“This License” refers to version 3 of the GNU Affero General Public License. + +“Copyright” also means copyright-like laws that apply to other kinds of +works, such as semiconductor masks. + +“The Program” refers to any copyrightable work licensed under this +License. Each licensee is addressed as “you”. “Licensees” and +“recipients” may be individuals or organizations. + +To “modify” a work means to copy from or adapt all or part of the work +in a fashion requiring copyright permission, other than the making of an +exact copy. The resulting work is called a “modified version” of the +earlier work or a work “based on” the earlier work. + +A “covered work” means either the unmodified Program or a work based +on the Program. + +To “propagate” a work means to do anything with it that, without +permission, would make you directly or secondarily liable for +infringement under applicable copyright law, except executing it on a +computer or modifying a private copy. Propagation includes copying, +distribution (with or without modification), making available to the +public, and in some countries other activities as well. + +To “convey” a work means any kind of propagation that enables other +parties to make or receive copies. Mere interaction with a user through +a computer network, with no transfer of a copy, is not conveying. + +An interactive user interface displays “Appropriate Legal Notices” +to the extent that it includes a convenient and prominently visible +feature that **(1)** displays an appropriate copyright notice, and **(2)** +tells the user that there is no warranty for the work (except to the +extent that warranties are provided), that licensees may convey the +work under this License, and how to view a copy of this License. If +the interface presents a list of user commands or options, such as a +menu, a prominent item in the list meets this criterion. + +### 1. Source Code + +The “source code” for a work means the preferred form of the work +for making modifications to it. “Object code” means any non-source +form of a work. + +A “Standard Interface” means an interface that either is an official +standard defined by a recognized standards body, or, in the case of +interfaces specified for a particular programming language, one that +is widely used among developers working in that language. + +The “System Libraries” of an executable work include anything, other +than the work as a whole, that **(a)** is included in the normal form of +packaging a Major Component, but which is not part of that Major +Component, and **(b)** serves only to enable use of the work with that +Major Component, or to implement a Standard Interface for which an +implementation is available to the public in source code form. A +“Major Component”, in this context, means a major essential component +(kernel, window system, and so on) of the specific operating system +(if any) on which the executable work runs, or a compiler used to +produce the work, or an object code interpreter used to run it. + +The “Corresponding Source” for a work in object code form means all +the source code needed to generate, install, and (for an executable +work) run the object code and to modify the work, including scripts to +control those activities. However, it does not include the work's +System Libraries, or general-purpose tools or generally available free +programs which are used unmodified in performing those activities but +which are not part of the work. For example, Corresponding Source +includes interface definition files associated with source files for +the work, and the source code for shared libraries and dynamically +linked subprograms that the work is specifically designed to require, +such as by intimate data communication or control flow between those +subprograms and other parts of the work. + +The Corresponding Source need not include anything that users +can regenerate automatically from other parts of the Corresponding +Source. + +The Corresponding Source for a work in source code form is that +same work. + +### 2. Basic Permissions + +All rights granted under this License are granted for the term of +copyright on the Program, and are irrevocable provided the stated +conditions are met. This License explicitly affirms your unlimited +permission to run the unmodified Program. The output from running a +covered work is covered by this License only if the output, given its +content, constitutes a covered work. This License acknowledges your +rights of fair use or other equivalent, as provided by copyright law. + +You may make, run and propagate covered works that you do not +convey, without conditions so long as your license otherwise remains +in force. You may convey covered works to others for the sole purpose +of having them make modifications exclusively for you, or provide you +with facilities for running those works, provided that you comply with +the terms of this License in conveying all material for which you do +not control copyright. Those thus making or running the covered works +for you must do so exclusively on your behalf, under your direction +and control, on terms that prohibit them from making any copies of +your copyrighted material outside their relationship with you. + +Conveying under any other circumstances is permitted solely under +the conditions stated below. Sublicensing is not allowed; section 10 +makes it unnecessary. + +### 3. Protecting Users' Legal Rights From Anti-Circumvention Law + +No covered work shall be deemed part of an effective technological +measure under any applicable law fulfilling obligations under article +11 of the WIPO copyright treaty adopted on 20 December 1996, or +similar laws prohibiting or restricting circumvention of such +measures. + +When you convey a covered work, you waive any legal power to forbid +circumvention of technological measures to the extent such circumvention +is effected by exercising rights under this License with respect to +the covered work, and you disclaim any intention to limit operation or +modification of the work as a means of enforcing, against the work's +users, your or third parties' legal rights to forbid circumvention of +technological measures. + +### 4. Conveying Verbatim Copies + +You may convey verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you +receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and +appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice; +keep intact all notices stating that this License and any +non-permissive terms added in accord with section 7 apply to the code; +keep intact all notices of the absence of any warranty; and give all +recipients a copy of this License along with the Program. + +You may charge any price or no price for each copy that you convey, +and you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee. + +### 5. Conveying Modified Source Versions + +You may convey a work based on the Program, or the modifications to +produce it from the Program, in the form of source code under the +terms of section 4, provided that you also meet all of these conditions: + +* **a)** The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified +it, and giving a relevant date. +* **b)** The work must carry prominent notices stating that it is +released under this License and any conditions added under section 7. +This requirement modifies the requirement in section 4 to +“keep intact all notices”. +* **c)** You must license the entire work, as a whole, under this +License to anyone who comes into possession of a copy. This +License will therefore apply, along with any applicable section 7 +additional terms, to the whole of the work, and all its parts, +regardless of how they are packaged. This License gives no +permission to license the work in any other way, but it does not +invalidate such permission if you have separately received it. +* **d)** If the work has interactive user interfaces, each must display +Appropriate Legal Notices; however, if the Program has interactive +interfaces that do not display Appropriate Legal Notices, your +work need not make them do so. + +A compilation of a covered work with other separate and independent +works, which are not by their nature extensions of the covered work, +and which are not combined with it such as to form a larger program, +in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium, is called an +“aggregate” if the compilation and its resulting copyright are not +used to limit the access or legal rights of the compilation's users +beyond what the individual works permit. Inclusion of a covered work +in an aggregate does not cause this License to apply to the other +parts of the aggregate. + +### 6. Conveying Non-Source Forms + +You may convey a covered work in object code form under the terms +of sections 4 and 5, provided that you also convey the +machine-readable Corresponding Source under the terms of this License, +in one of these ways: + +* **a)** Convey the object code in, or embodied in, a physical product +(including a physical distribution medium), accompanied by the +Corresponding Source fixed on a durable physical medium +customarily used for software interchange. +* **b)** Convey the object code in, or embodied in, a physical product +(including a physical distribution medium), accompanied by a +written offer, valid for at least three years and valid for as +long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product +model, to give anyone who possesses the object code either **(1)** a +copy of the Corresponding Source for all the software in the +product that is covered by this License, on a durable physical +medium customarily used for software interchange, for a price no +more than your reasonable cost of physically performing this +conveying of source, or **(2)** access to copy the +Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge. +* **c)** Convey individual copies of the object code with a copy of the +written offer to provide the Corresponding Source. This +alternative is allowed only occasionally and noncommercially, and +only if you received the object code with such an offer, in accord +with subsection 6b. +* **d)** Convey the object code by offering access from a designated +place (gratis or for a charge), and offer equivalent access to the +Corresponding Source in the same way through the same place at no +further charge. You need not require recipients to copy the +Corresponding Source along with the object code. If the place to +copy the object code is a network server, the Corresponding Source +may be on a different server (operated by you or a third party) +that supports equivalent copying facilities, provided you maintain +clear directions next to the object code saying where to find the +Corresponding Source. Regardless of what server hosts the +Corresponding Source, you remain obligated to ensure that it is +available for as long as needed to satisfy these requirements. +* **e)** Convey the object code using peer-to-peer transmission, provided +you inform other peers where the object code and Corresponding +Source of the work are being offered to the general public at no +charge under subsection 6d. + +A separable portion of the object code, whose source code is excluded +from the Corresponding Source as a System Library, need not be +included in conveying the object code work. + +A “User Product” is either **(1)** a “consumer product”, which means any +tangible personal property which is normally used for personal, family, +or household purposes, or **(2)** anything designed or sold for incorporation +into a dwelling. In determining whether a product is a consumer product, +doubtful cases shall be resolved in favor of coverage. For a particular +product received by a particular user, “normally used” refers to a +typical or common use of that class of product, regardless of the status +of the particular user or of the way in which the particular user +actually uses, or expects or is expected to use, the product. A product +is a consumer product regardless of whether the product has substantial +commercial, industrial or non-consumer uses, unless such uses represent +the only significant mode of use of the product. + +“Installation Information” for a User Product means any methods, +procedures, authorization keys, or other information required to install +and execute modified versions of a covered work in that User Product from +a modified version of its Corresponding Source. The information must +suffice to ensure that the continued functioning of the modified object +code is in no case prevented or interfered with solely because +modification has been made. + +If you convey an object code work under this section in, or with, or +specifically for use in, a User Product, and the conveying occurs as +part of a transaction in which the right of possession and use of the +User Product is transferred to the recipient in perpetuity or for a +fixed term (regardless of how the transaction is characterized), the +Corresponding Source conveyed under this section must be accompanied +by the Installation Information. But this requirement does not apply +if neither you nor any third party retains the ability to install +modified object code on the User Product (for example, the work has +been installed in ROM). + +The requirement to provide Installation Information does not include a +requirement to continue to provide support service, warranty, or updates +for a work that has been modified or installed by the recipient, or for +the User Product in which it has been modified or installed. Access to a +network may be denied when the modification itself materially and +adversely affects the operation of the network or violates the rules and +protocols for communication across the network. + +Corresponding Source conveyed, and Installation Information provided, +in accord with this section must be in a format that is publicly +documented (and with an implementation available to the public in +source code form), and must require no special password or key for +unpacking, reading or copying. + +### 7. Additional Terms + +“Additional permissions” are terms that supplement the terms of this +License by making exceptions from one or more of its conditions. +Additional permissions that are applicable to the entire Program shall +be treated as though they were included in this License, to the extent +that they are valid under applicable law. If additional permissions +apply only to part of the Program, that part may be used separately +under those permissions, but the entire Program remains governed by +this License without regard to the additional permissions. + +When you convey a copy of a covered work, you may at your option +remove any additional permissions from that copy, or from any part of +it. (Additional permissions may be written to require their own +removal in certain cases when you modify the work.) You may place +additional permissions on material, added by you to a covered work, +for which you have or can give appropriate copyright permission. + +Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, for material you +add to a covered work, you may (if authorized by the copyright holders of +that material) supplement the terms of this License with terms: + +* **a)** Disclaiming warranty or limiting liability differently from the +terms of sections 15 and 16 of this License; or +* **b)** Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or +author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal +Notices displayed by works containing it; or +* **c)** Prohibiting misrepresentation of the origin of that material, or +requiring that modified versions of such material be marked in +reasonable ways as different from the original version; or +* **d)** Limiting the use for publicity purposes of names of licensors or +authors of the material; or +* **e)** Declining to grant rights under trademark law for use of some +trade names, trademarks, or service marks; or +* **f)** Requiring indemnification of licensors and authors of that +material by anyone who conveys the material (or modified versions of +it) with contractual assumptions of liability to the recipient, for +any liability that these contractual assumptions directly impose on +those licensors and authors. + +All other non-permissive additional terms are considered “further +restrictions” within the meaning of section 10. If the Program as you +received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is +governed by this License along with a term that is a further +restriction, you may remove that term. If a license document contains +a further restriction but permits relicensing or conveying under this +License, you may add to a covered work material governed by the terms +of that license document, provided that the further restriction does +not survive such relicensing or conveying. + +If you add terms to a covered work in accord with this section, you +must place, in the relevant source files, a statement of the +additional terms that apply to those files, or a notice indicating +where to find the applicable terms. + +Additional terms, permissive or non-permissive, may be stated in the +form of a separately written license, or stated as exceptions; +the above requirements apply either way. + +### 8. Termination + +You may not propagate or modify a covered work except as expressly +provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to propagate or +modify it is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under +this License (including any patent licenses granted under the third +paragraph of section 11). + +However, if you cease all violation of this License, then your +license from a particular copyright holder is reinstated **(a)** +provisionally, unless and until the copyright holder explicitly and +finally terminates your license, and **(b)** permanently, if the copyright +holder fails to notify you of the violation by some reasonable means +prior to 60 days after the cessation. + +Moreover, your license from a particular copyright holder is +reinstated permanently if the copyright holder notifies you of the +violation by some reasonable means, this is the first time you have +received notice of violation of this License (for any work) from that +copyright holder, and you cure the violation prior to 30 days after +your receipt of the notice. + +Termination of your rights under this section does not terminate the +licenses of parties who have received copies or rights from you under +this License. If your rights have been terminated and not permanently +reinstated, you do not qualify to receive new licenses for the same +material under section 10. + +### 9. Acceptance Not Required for Having Copies + +You are not required to accept this License in order to receive or +run a copy of the Program. Ancillary propagation of a covered work +occurring solely as a consequence of using peer-to-peer transmission +to receive a copy likewise does not require acceptance. However, +nothing other than this License grants you permission to propagate or +modify any covered work. These actions infringe copyright if you do +not accept this License. Therefore, by modifying or propagating a +covered work, you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so. + +### 10. Automatic Licensing of Downstream Recipients + +Each time you convey a covered work, the recipient automatically +receives a license from the original licensors, to run, modify and +propagate that work, subject to this License. You are not responsible +for enforcing compliance by third parties with this License. + +An “entity transaction” is a transaction transferring control of an +organization, or substantially all assets of one, or subdividing an +organization, or merging organizations. If propagation of a covered +work results from an entity transaction, each party to that +transaction who receives a copy of the work also receives whatever +licenses to the work the party's predecessor in interest had or could +give under the previous paragraph, plus a right to possession of the +Corresponding Source of the work from the predecessor in interest, if +the predecessor has it or can get it with reasonable efforts. + +You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the +rights granted or affirmed under this License. For example, you may +not impose a license fee, royalty, or other charge for exercise of +rights granted under this License, and you may not initiate litigation +(including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that +any patent claim is infringed by making, using, selling, offering for +sale, or importing the Program or any portion of it. + +### 11. Patents + +A “contributor” is a copyright holder who authorizes use under this +License of the Program or a work on which the Program is based. The +work thus licensed is called the contributor's “contributor version”. + +A contributor's “essential patent claims” are all patent claims +owned or controlled by the contributor, whether already acquired or +hereafter acquired, that would be infringed by some manner, permitted +by this License, of making, using, or selling its contributor version, +but do not include claims that would be infringed only as a +consequence of further modification of the contributor version. For +purposes of this definition, “control” includes the right to grant +patent sublicenses in a manner consistent with the requirements of +this License. + +Each contributor grants you a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free +patent license under the contributor's essential patent claims, to +make, use, sell, offer for sale, import and otherwise run, modify and +propagate the contents of its contributor version. + +In the following three paragraphs, a “patent license” is any express +agreement or commitment, however denominated, not to enforce a patent +(such as an express permission to practice a patent or covenant not to +sue for patent infringement). To “grant” such a patent license to a +party means to make such an agreement or commitment not to enforce a +patent against the party. + +If you convey a covered work, knowingly relying on a patent license, +and the Corresponding Source of the work is not available for anyone +to copy, free of charge and under the terms of this License, through a +publicly available network server or other readily accessible means, +then you must either **(1)** cause the Corresponding Source to be so +available, or **(2)** arrange to deprive yourself of the benefit of the +patent license for this particular work, or **(3)** arrange, in a manner +consistent with the requirements of this License, to extend the patent +license to downstream recipients. “Knowingly relying” means you have +actual knowledge that, but for the patent license, your conveying the +covered work in a country, or your recipient's use of the covered work +in a country, would infringe one or more identifiable patents in that +country that you have reason to believe are valid. + +If, pursuant to or in connection with a single transaction or +arrangement, you convey, or propagate by procuring conveyance of, a +covered work, and grant a patent license to some of the parties +receiving the covered work authorizing them to use, propagate, modify +or convey a specific copy of the covered work, then the patent license +you grant is automatically extended to all recipients of the covered +work and works based on it. + +A patent license is “discriminatory” if it does not include within +the scope of its coverage, prohibits the exercise of, or is +conditioned on the non-exercise of one or more of the rights that are +specifically granted under this License. You may not convey a covered +work if you are a party to an arrangement with a third party that is +in the business of distributing software, under which you make payment +to the third party based on the extent of your activity of conveying +the work, and under which the third party grants, to any of the +parties who would receive the covered work from you, a discriminatory +patent license **(a)** in connection with copies of the covered work +conveyed by you (or copies made from those copies), or **(b)** primarily +for and in connection with specific products or compilations that +contain the covered work, unless you entered into that arrangement, +or that patent license was granted, prior to 28 March 2007. + +Nothing in this License shall be construed as excluding or limiting +any implied license or other defenses to infringement that may +otherwise be available to you under applicable patent law. + +### 12. No Surrender of Others' Freedom + +If conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or +otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not +excuse you from the conditions of this License. If you cannot convey a +covered work so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this +License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may +not convey it at all. For example, if you agree to terms that obligate you +to collect a royalty for further conveying from those to whom you convey +the Program, the only way you could satisfy both those terms and this +License would be to refrain entirely from conveying the Program. + +### 13. Remote Network Interaction; Use with the GNU General Public License + +Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, if you modify the +Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users +interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version +supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding +Source of your version by providing access to the Corresponding Source +from a network server at no charge, through some standard or customary +means of facilitating copying of software. This Corresponding Source +shall include the Corresponding Source for any work covered by version 3 +of the GNU General Public License that is incorporated pursuant to the +following paragraph. + +Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, you have +permission to link or combine any covered work with a work licensed +under version 3 of the GNU General Public License into a single +combined work, and to convey the resulting work. The terms of this +License will continue to apply to the part which is the covered work, +but the work with which it is combined will remain governed by version +3 of the GNU General Public License. + +### 14. Revised Versions of this License + +The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions of +the GNU Affero General Public License from time to time. Such new versions +will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to +address new problems or concerns. + +Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the +Program specifies that a certain numbered version of the GNU Affero General +Public License “or any later version” applies to it, you have the +option of following the terms and conditions either of that numbered +version or of any later version published by the Free Software +Foundation. If the Program does not specify a version number of the +GNU Affero General Public License, you may choose any version ever published +by the Free Software Foundation. + +If the Program specifies that a proxy can decide which future +versions of the GNU Affero General Public License can be used, that proxy's +public statement of acceptance of a version permanently authorizes you +to choose that version for the Program. + +Later license versions may give you additional or different +permissions. However, no additional obligations are imposed on any +author or copyright holder as a result of your choosing to follow a +later version. + +### 15. Disclaimer of Warranty + +THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY +APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT +HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTY +OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, +THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR +PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM +IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF +ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION. + +### 16. Limitation of Liability + +IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING +WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MODIFIES AND/OR CONVEYS +THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING ANY +GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE +USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF +DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY YOU OR THIRD +PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAMS), +EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF +SUCH DAMAGES. + +### 17. Interpretation of Sections 15 and 16 + +If the disclaimer of warranty and limitation of liability provided +above cannot be given local legal effect according to their terms, +reviewing courts shall apply local law that most closely approximates +an absolute waiver of all civil liability in connection with the +Program, unless a warranty or assumption of liability accompanies a +copy of the Program in return for a fee. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/README.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d40ce188a47 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +# `@hashintel/brunch-agent-repertoire` + +The harness's own teaching, as data: `repertoire.yaml` fills every guidance key +(`lenses`, `techniques`, `movements.slice`, `movements.sweep`, `licenses`, +`motifs`, `smells`, `rabbit_holes`, `failure_modes`) and every runbook key +(`kickoff`, `trajectory`, `close`) of every job (`construct`, +`review-and-revise`) with what an interviewer is taught before any plugin +speaks. The keys, their definitions, and the reader live in the harness +(`packages/core/src/keys.ts`, `repertoire.ts`); this package is the filling. + +Two rules the reader enforces here and not on a plugin: every key is filled, +and every entry names its `source` — a run, a replay, a verified literature +finding, or an accepted decision. Admission is by evidence (ADR-0007 +decision 7). Entries name no formalism and no domain; the test checks. + +## Topology + +Depends on `@hashintel/brunch-agent` only. A binding depends on this package +and renders it interleaved with a plugin definition +(`renderInstructions(repertoire, definition)`), key by key: the harness's +definition of the key, then the default here, then the plugin's cell. A plugin +never imports the repertoire: its cell is written against the harness's +definition of the key, and adds to the default without overriding it. + +## Changing it + +Add an entry when a run, replay, or verified source shows the interviewer +needs it, and cite that source. Add a key only through the harness's catalogue +(`keys.ts`) and its changelog (`packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md`), which is +a working set until a co-authoring cycle changes no key (ADR-0007 decision 9). +Reference: `docs/adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md`. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/package.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/package.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d555717a11f --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/package.json @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +{ + "name": "@hashintel/brunch-agent-repertoire", + "version": "0.0.0-private", + "private": true, + "description": "The harness repertoire: the default teaching for every guidance and runbook key (ADR-0007).", + "license": "AGPL-3.0", + "type": "module", + "exports": { + ".": { + "types": "./src/index.ts", + "import": "./dist/index.js" + } + }, + "scripts": { + "build": "vite build", + "fix:eslint": "oxlint --fix --type-aware --type-check --report-unused-disable-directives-severity=error .", + "lint:eslint": "oxlint --type-aware --type-check --report-unused-disable-directives-severity=error .", + "lint:tsc": "tsgo --noEmit", + "test:unit": "vitest run" + }, + "dependencies": { + "@hashintel/brunch-agent": "workspace:*" + }, + "devDependencies": { + "@types/node": "22.18.13", + "@typescript/native-preview": "7.0.0-dev.20260511.1", + "oxlint": "1.63.0", + "oxlint-tsgolint": "0.22.1", + "vite": "8.1.0", + "vitest": "4.1.10" + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/repertoire.yaml b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/repertoire.yaml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cfc2a709b1a --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/repertoire.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,208 @@ +# The harness repertoire (ADR-0007 decisions 3, 7, 8). +# +# The harness's own filling of every guidance and runbook key — what the +# interviewer is taught before any plugin says a word. Every entry names its +# source; admission is by evidence (a run, a replay, a verified literature +# finding, or an accepted decision), not by plausibility. Entries are written +# in the harness's terms and name no formalism and no domain; a plugin's cell +# under the same key adds to what is here and never overrides it. +# +# Paths are relative to the Brunch context root. + +repertoire: + version: repertoire/2026-08-25.1 + purpose: | + Teach the interviewer how an expert-knowledge interview goes right and + wrong, independent of what is being modelled: what to attend to, how to + deepen an answer, the two shapes a stretch of interview takes, what is + permitted, what recurs, what smells, where not to dig, how the interview + fails, and how each job begins, proceeds, and ends. + +guidance: + lenses: + - name: Vague terms and quantifiers + text: '"Usually", "roughly", "mostly fine", "sometimes" each hide either a distribution or an exception. When one appears, the answer is not yet usable; deepen it before recording it.' + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (Probe); docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-14 + - name: Policy versus practice + text: 'An answer in normative language — "we would", "the rule is", "you are supposed to" — reports a policy, not what happens. It is an occasion to ask when that last actually happened and what was done.' + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §2.3 (policy-vs-practice detector); docs/archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md CPS-Q05 + - name: Two answers in tension + text: When something just said does not fit something said earlier, the tension is evidence — of a distinction not yet drawn, a condition not yet named, or an error. Say so and ask; do not pick one silently. + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (check consistency); docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §5.1 (consistency probe) + - name: Cues the expert relies on + text: 'After any substantive answer, the expert''s basis is worth more than the answer: "how would you know that — what are you actually looking at?" and "how would this be hard for someone less experienced?" surface what the expert did not think to say.' + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §2.2 (universal cue follow-up rule, ACTA) + - name: Burden and impatience + text: A cue that the expert is pressed, bored, or burdened is a fact about the interview, not a permission to stop. Notice it, name what is still missing, and let the expert choose; never let it end the interview by itself. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-04; evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-prompt.md HINT-RESPECTFUL-CLOSE + techniques: + - name: Ask for the last time + text: Prefer "when did that last happen, and what did you do?" to any generalisation. A story yields the sequence, the cues, and the exception; a generalisation yields the policy. + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (last-time-it-happened stories); docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §2.2 (CDM incident probe) + - name: No bare why + text: 'Never ask "why do you do it this way?" as the primary probe; experts cannot report the basis of practised judgment on demand. Ask for an occasion and for what was attended to.' + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §2.4 (no-bare-why rule) + - name: Mean or tail + text: Before eliciting any quantity, ask whether what matters is the typical case or the bad one — a mean or a tail. The answer decides whether a single figure, a range, or a spread is being asked for. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §1.3 (mean-or-tail router) + - name: Quantiles, never three points + text: 'For anything that varies, ask "typically?", then "one time in ten, worse than?", then "one time in ten, better than?". Never ask for minimum, most likely, and maximum — the three-point habit yields overconfident answers. If a min/mode/max triple arrives unprompted, ask the confidence question and record whether the middle value is a mode or a mean.' + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (category 4); docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §1.4 (IDEA four-step interval, anti-triangular guard) + - name: The clairvoyant test + text: A quantity is well enough defined only when someone who could see everything could report it without asking a clarifying question. If the slot's name would need one, ask the clarifying question first. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §1.4 (Howard's clairvoyant test) + - name: Consistency probe + text: '"You said earlier that ___, but then you told me ___. How do you explain that?" — stated plainly, without choosing between the two.' + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §5.1 (consistency probe) + - name: Premortem + text: 'For anything rare or catastrophic, ask the expert to imagine it has already gone wrong — "it is a year from now and this has been the worst month on record; what happened?" — and demand mechanism and sequence, not sentiment.' + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §2.2 (premortem card) + - name: Restate to check + text: '"So you are saying that ___?" — a restatement in your own words, offered for correction. Use it to fix an answer in its context, never to put words in the expert''s mouth; a correction is a capture, assent to your phrasing is not.' + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §5.1 (check-reflect / restatement); docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-15 + movements: + slice: + - name: One concrete case end to end + text: 'Before sweeping anything, walk one real case from beginning to end — "walk me through one, from when it arrives to when it leaves". The slice exposes the structure and the vocabulary; everything the sweeps later ask about, they ask about because the slice revealed it.' + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (Slice, then sweep); docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §1.2 (bounded task-diagram opener) + - name: Escalate hypotheticals only from a real case + text: A what-if is useful only when anchored to an incident already on record; vary the real case. A free-floating hypothetical returns the expert's policy, not their practice. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §2.3 (hypothetical-escalation card) + sweep: + - name: One property across one stratum + text: A sweep makes one property hold across one class of node the slice revealed — every step has a duration, every resource has a count. Sweep after the slice, and one property at a time, so the expert can answer from a single frame. + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (Slice, then sweep); docs/control/SPEC-LEDGER.md §11.5 + - name: Ask for absences + text: 'Near the end of each topic ask "is there anything that never happens?" and "what have I not asked about that matters here?". What never happens is a constraint; what was not asked is the coverage the model would otherwise silently lack.' + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (Ask for absences); docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-08 + - name: Exceptions as a sweep + text: For each kind of thing that can go wrong, ask what happens to the work in hand, what happens to the case as a whole, and what the recovery is — three questions, asked across the exceptions the expert names. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §3.1 (exception sweep card) + licenses: + - name: Batch breadth, sequence depth + text: You may group two to four related survey questions in one turn when they share a frame; probe one thread at a time when deepening. Five items is a warning; an opening battery is a failure. + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (Batch breadth, sequence depth); docs/archive/specs/cps-interview-guidance-2026-08-25.md GEN-Q02; docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-12 + - name: Name the grade + text: You may tell the expert what an answer has reached and what is still needed — "I have the typical figure; I do not yet have how bad it gets" — and ask for the smallest thing that would close the gap. + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-prompt.md HINT-STATUS-GRADE + - name: Say what you would assume + text: You may propose an assumption to unblock the interview, provided it is stated as yours, entered in the assumption ledger with why and how to check it, and the expert is asked. You may never let it pass into the model as theirs. + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (Keep an assumption ledger); docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-06, FM-15 + - name: Defer with a deposit + text: You may leave a topic unfinished when the expert cannot answer now — but only by recording what is missing, why, and where it would come from. A deferral without a deposit is a promise, and promises are the failure. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md (Licensed deferral is a deposit, not a promise; FM-02, FM-03) + motifs: + - name: Ask whether, never assemble + text: A motif is a question — "is there something here that works like ___?" — asked with its parameters. The expert's account is where structure comes from; the motif catalogue drives questions and gap-detection, never the model. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §3.1 (do not synthesise from the catalogue; verdict) + - name: Name plus variant + text: Never record a motif by name alone; record the name and the axis on which it varies, in the expert's words. Names are stable across the literature and semantics are not. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §3.1 (variant-selector rule) + smells: + - name: A value the expert did not give + text: A precise number, category, threshold, or rule appears in what you are about to record and you cannot point to the words it came from. Stop; either find the words or move it to the assumption ledger. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-06, FM-07 + - name: Many questions in one turn + text: You are about to ask more than four things at once, or anything at all before the first answer has landed. The expert will choose which to answer and silently drop the rest. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-12 + - name: Fluent and empty + text: The conversation reads well and the completion report still lists the same unsatisfied slots it did three turns ago. Fluency is not progress. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-13, FM-01 + - name: Assent taken as origin + text: The expert agreed to a phrasing that was yours. Their agreement is evidence that they did not object, not that they said it; the capture must quote them, not you. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-15 + rabbit_holes: + - name: Structure before responses + text: Asking about how the system is built before knowing what question it must answer produces detail nobody needs. Refuse a structural thread until at least one objective or response is on record. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §1.2 (responses-before-structure guard); evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (Objectives first) + - name: The representation stopped changing + text: That the model has stopped growing is not evidence it is complete; it is evidence you have stopped asking. Stop on the demanded slots, never on stability. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §4.4 (criterion-based stopping) + - name: Depth where nothing depends on it + text: A fact earns probing when something the model must answer depends on it. Depth on a node outside every anchor's slice is effort the expert pays for and the model does not use. + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (Objectives first — depth is objective-relative); docs/adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md + failure_modes: + - name: Silent hardening + text: A vague or hedged answer becomes a precise value in the model without a clarification turn. + signature: A precise value, category, threshold, distribution, or rule appears in the model with no user span at that precision. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-06 + - name: Invented content + text: A load-bearing element of the model has no supporting words from the expert. + signature: A model element with no user span and no ledger entry. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-07 + - name: Never-asked coverage blindness + text: A demanded slot is never addressed because nothing prompted the question. + signature: A demanded kind, slot, or sweep item was never the subject of any turn. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-08 + - name: Opening overload + text: The interview opens with a battery of questions. + signature: One turn contains many independent questions, especially before the first answer. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-12 + - name: Unresolved ambiguity bypass + text: A vague term, quantifier, unexplained domain word, or contradiction feeds one precise assertion. + signature: Such a term precedes a precise capture with no clarification turn, alternative, or typed issue between them. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-14 + - name: Unlicensed influence + text: The interviewer supplies an estimate, frames an ungrounded option as established, or treats assent to its own words as the expert's content. + signature: A model-authored value or option becomes a capture without an independent user span. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-15 + - name: Premature accommodation + text: A burden or impatience cue ends the interview while demanded slots remain. + signature: Termination follows a burden cue with unsatisfied demands and no statement of what is missing. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-04 + - name: Deferral without deposit + text: The interviewer names future work or external data as a prerequisite and records nothing. + signature: A promise of later work with no durable record of what is missing and where it would come from. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-02, FM-03 + +runbooks: + construct: + kickoff: + - name: Objectives first + text: Establish what the model must be able to answer, and for whom, before anything else; then let it prioritise the rest. What "better" means, numerically where possible, is almost never written down — expect to co-construct it. + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (Objectives first, category 1) + - name: The posture + text: "From the first exchanges, take the expert's time available, what the model is for, how confident it must be, and how far they will tolerate you proposing assumptions. These set the interview's stance; they are not asked as a form." + source: docs/adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md (decision 4) + - name: No structure in the first exchange + text: Do not ask how the system is built until an objective is on record. The bounded opener is a three-to-six-step account of what happens, not a diagram. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §1.2 (opening-five card) + trajectory: + - name: Slice, then sweep + text: Walk one case end to end, then sweep each property across what the slice revealed. Return to a slice when a sweep exposes a case the first slice did not cover. + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (Slice, then sweep) + - name: Deepen before recording + text: When an answer is not yet usable — vague, normative, or in tension with an earlier one — apply a technique to it before moving on. One thread at a time. + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (Probe); docs/reference/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md FM-14 + - name: Keep the assumption ledger + text: Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state goes in a numbered list with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let one pass silently into the model. + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (Keep an assumption ledger) + - name: Change technique when yield drops + text: When several turns produce nothing new, change technique — a story, a contrast, a sweep of absences — rather than asking more of the same open questions. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §2.4 (yield monitor) + close: + - name: End properly + text: Before delivering, summarise what you have, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep going once the demanded slots are satisfied. + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (End properly) + - name: Read it back + text: The close is a walkthrough — the model read back item by item for sign-off — not a document handed over for silent review. + source: docs/reference/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md §4.4 (walkthrough card) + - name: Honour a stop + text: When the expert stops, open no new topic. State the best useful result, the gaps, and the assumptions, and deliver what exists. + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/condition-3-prompt.md HINT-RESPECTFUL-CLOSE + - name: Deliver the losses + text: The deliverable includes the assumption ledger and a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why. + source: evaluations/protocols/process-model-elicitation/baseline/v0-prompt.md (The deliverable) + review-and-revise: + kickoff: + - name: Locate the change + text: Establish which node changed, or which the expert disputes, before revising anything. The harness computes the affected slice from it; nothing outside the slice is in play. + source: docs/adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md (decision 4); CONTEXT.md (Job) + trajectory: + - name: Revise within the slice + text: Re-elicit the changed node's slots, then re-check each anchor whose slice contains it. A new capture supersedes; it does not edit. + source: docs/adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md (decision 4) + close: + - name: Report the difference + text: Say what changed, what it affected, and what the model can now answer that it could not, or no longer can. + source: docs/adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md (decision 4) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/src/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/src/index.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..267c4e3a846 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/src/index.ts @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +/** + * `@hashintel/brunch-agent-repertoire` — the harness's own teaching (ADR-0007). + * + * `repertoire.yaml` fills every guidance and runbook key the harness owns with + * the default an interviewer is taught before any plugin speaks; every entry + * names its source. A binding renders it interleaved with a plugin definition + * (`renderInstructions` in the harness); a plugin never imports it — a plugin + * cell is written against the harness's definition of the key, not against + * this text. + * + * **This package resolves `@hashintel/brunch-agent` and nothing else.** + */ + +import { readRepertoire } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent"; + +import repertoireYaml from "../repertoire.yaml?raw"; + +/** The repertoire; reading fails loudly at module load if a key is empty or unsourced. */ +export const repertoire = readRepertoire(repertoireYaml); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/src/raw-imports.d.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/src/raw-imports.d.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c24bf038f8c --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/src/raw-imports.d.ts @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +/** Vite's `?raw` import: the repertoire ships inside the bundle as a string. */ +declare module "*.yaml?raw" { + const yaml: string; + export default yaml; +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/test/repertoire.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/test/repertoire.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ad697c7bf30 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/test/repertoire.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; + +import { + GUIDANCE_KEYS, + guidanceEntries, + JOBS, + MOVEMENTS, + RUNBOOK_KEYS, + runbookEntries, +} from "@hashintel/brunch-agent"; + +import { repertoire } from "../src/index"; + +/** Words that would mean the repertoire teaches a formalism or a domain. */ +const FORMALISM_OR_DOMAIN = + /\b(petri|transition|place|token|sdcpn|gherkin|scenario|feature|hospital|coating|truck|packaging)\b/iu; + +describe("the shipped repertoire", () => { + test("fills every guidance key, both movements, and every runbook key of every job", () => { + const guidancePaths = new Set( + guidanceEntries(repertoire.guidance).map((entry) => entry.path), + ); + const expectedGuidance = GUIDANCE_KEYS.flatMap((key) => + key === "movements" + ? MOVEMENTS.map((movement) => `movements.${movement}`) + : [key], + ); + expect([...guidancePaths].sort()).toEqual([...expectedGuidance].sort()); + + const runbookPaths = new Set( + runbookEntries(repertoire.runbooks).map((entry) => entry.path), + ); + const expectedRunbooks = JOBS.flatMap((job) => + RUNBOOK_KEYS.map((key) => `${job}.${key}`), + ); + expect([...runbookPaths].sort()).toEqual([...expectedRunbooks].sort()); + }); + + test("every entry names its source and gives a failure mode its signature", () => { + const entries = [ + ...guidanceEntries(repertoire.guidance), + ...runbookEntries(repertoire.runbooks), + ]; + expect(entries.length).toBeGreaterThan(20); + expect( + entries + .filter(({ item }) => item.source === undefined) + .map(({ path, item }) => `${path}: ${item.name}`), + ).toEqual([]); + expect( + entries + .filter( + ({ path, item }) => + path === "failure_modes" && item.signature === undefined, + ) + .map(({ item }) => item.name), + ).toEqual([]); + }); + + test("teaches the harness's concepts, not a formalism or a domain", () => { + const text = [ + ...guidanceEntries(repertoire.guidance), + ...runbookEntries(repertoire.runbooks), + ] + .map(({ item }) => `${item.name} ${item.text} ${item.signature ?? ""}`) + .join("\n"); + expect(text).not.toMatch(FORMALISM_OR_DOMAIN); + }); +}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/tsconfig.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/tsconfig.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..844edbd8e66 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/tsconfig.json @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +{ + "compilerOptions": { + "target": "es2024", + "lib": ["ESNext"], + "types": ["node"], + "module": "preserve", + "moduleResolution": "bundler", + "strict": true, + "esModuleInterop": true, + "forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": true, + "noFallthroughCasesInSwitch": true, + "noUncheckedIndexedAccess": true, + "resolveJsonModule": true, + "noEmit": true, + "skipLibCheck": true, + "isolatedModules": true + }, + "include": ["src", "test"] +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/turbo.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/turbo.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6d9a1d1f9e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/turbo.json @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +{ + "extends": ["//"], + "tasks": { + "build": { + "dependsOn": ["^build"], + "outputs": ["dist/**"], + "cache": false + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/vite.config.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/vite.config.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7ada2315df0 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire/vite.config.ts @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; + +import { defineConfig } from "vitest/config"; + +const packageRoot = fileURLToPath(new URL(".", import.meta.url)); + +export default defineConfig({ + build: { + lib: { + entry: fileURLToPath(new URL("src/index.ts", import.meta.url)), + fileName: "index", + formats: ["es"], + }, + rolldownOptions: { + external: [/^@hashintel\/brunch-agent(?:\/.*)?$/u], + }, + sourcemap: true, + }, + root: packageRoot, + test: { + include: ["test/**/*.test.ts"], + }, +}); diff --git a/yarn.lock b/yarn.lock index 512fa76e2dc..253a1baae03 100644 --- a/yarn.lock +++ b/yarn.lock @@ -7543,6 +7543,7 @@ __metadata: "@flue/runtime": "npm:2.0.3" "@flue/sdk": "npm:2.0.3" "@hashintel/brunch-agent": "workspace:*" + "@hashintel/brunch-agent-repertoire": "workspace:*" "@types/node": "npm:22.18.13" "@typescript/native-preview": "npm:7.0.0-dev.20260511.1" oxlint: "npm:1.63.0" @@ -7583,6 +7584,20 @@ __metadata: languageName: unknown linkType: soft +"@hashintel/brunch-agent-repertoire@workspace:*, @hashintel/brunch-agent-repertoire@workspace:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire": + version: 0.0.0-use.local + resolution: "@hashintel/brunch-agent-repertoire@workspace:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/repertoire" + dependencies: + "@hashintel/brunch-agent": "workspace:*" + "@types/node": "npm:22.18.13" + "@typescript/native-preview": "npm:7.0.0-dev.20260511.1" + oxlint: "npm:1.63.0" + oxlint-tsgolint: "npm:0.22.1" + vite: "npm:8.1.0" + vitest: "npm:4.1.10" + languageName: unknown + linkType: soft + "@hashintel/brunch-agent-transport-aisdk@workspace:*, @hashintel/brunch-agent-transport-aisdk@workspace:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk": version: 0.0.0-use.local resolution: "@hashintel/brunch-agent-transport-aisdk@workspace:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk" @@ -7606,12 +7621,14 @@ __metadata: "@anthropic-ai/sdk": "npm:0.74.0" "@types/node": "npm:22.18.13" "@typescript/native-preview": "npm:7.0.0-dev.20260511.1" + "@valibot/to-json-schema": "npm:1.7.1" fast-check: "npm:4.9.0" oxlint: "npm:1.63.0" oxlint-tsgolint: "npm:0.22.1" valibot: "npm:1.4.2" vite: "npm:8.1.0" vitest: "npm:4.1.10" + yaml: "npm:2.9.0" languageName: unknown linkType: soft @@ -19935,7 +19952,7 @@ __metadata: languageName: node linkType: hard -"@valibot/to-json-schema@npm:^1.3.0": +"@valibot/to-json-schema@npm:1.7.1, @valibot/to-json-schema@npm:^1.3.0": version: 1.7.1 resolution: "@valibot/to-json-schema@npm:1.7.1" peerDependencies: