To do a hardware-in-the-loop simulation of a drone, we need to book perhaps three spinners at the same time.
This is potentially possible using the manifest at present, so long as the experiments are given mutually orthogonal windows. An improved approach would be to allow students on the same course to access either the early exercises using a single spinner, or the later HIL exercise interchangeably, which means making both options available at the same time.
What is the best representation for this? Is it a "group/moecular" experiment feature, where we check availability of each of the constituent experiments, and do we allow interchangeability between the constituent atomic experiments? And can we/will we use a similar approach for assembled experiments in the future?
To do a hardware-in-the-loop simulation of a drone, we need to book perhaps three spinners at the same time.
This is potentially possible using the manifest at present, so long as the experiments are given mutually orthogonal windows. An improved approach would be to allow students on the same course to access either the early exercises using a single spinner, or the later HIL exercise interchangeably, which means making both options available at the same time.
What is the best representation for this? Is it a "group/moecular" experiment feature, where we check availability of each of the constituent experiments, and do we allow interchangeability between the constituent atomic experiments? And can we/will we use a similar approach for assembled experiments in the future?