Skip to content

Fallout from expansion of redundant import checking #121708

Description

@tmandry

I've noticed there is a lot of fallout from the changes in #117772 expanding redundant import checking. See discussion and backlinks on that issue as well as #118692 for some evidence.

I have a theory that redundant imports should be split out into their own lint group (this was discussed in the past), and that in the future as a matter of policy, disruptive expansions like this should come with a machine-applicable fix to make rollout smoother.

For now, I'm opening this issue to collect data and feedback that I want to use to inform future policy discussions around lint expansions.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    A-lintsArea: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut.A-resolveArea: Name/path resolution done by `rustc_resolve` specificallyI-lang-radarItems that are on lang's radar and will need eventual work or consideration.L-redundant_importsLint: redundant_importsS-waiting-on-reviewStatus: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.T-langRelevant to the language team

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions