Skip to content

adguard-home: clarify manual-update architecture - #460

Closed
Sil3ntVip3r wants to merge 1 commit into
AdguardTeam:masterfrom
Sil3ntVip3r:codex/4985-manual-update-architecture
Closed

Sil3ntVip3r wants to merge 1 commit into
AdguardTeam:masterfrom
Sil3ntVip3r:codex/4985-manual-update-architecture

Conversation

@Sil3ntVip3r

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • warn that the manual-update commands use AMD64 packages
  • map uname -m values to the AdGuard Home amd64 and arm64 archive labels
  • direct other architectures to the supported-platform package matrix

Why

AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome#4985 reports 64-bit ARM users following the manual-update example and ending up with a binary for the wrong CPU architecture. The FAQ identifies AMD64 as the example, but it does not tell aarch64 or arm64 users which archive label to use or that every architecture token in the file name and URL must be changed consistently.

Updates AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome#4985.

Validation

  • CI=true npx --yes pnpm@9.15.9 lint:md
  • CI=true NODE_OPTIONS=--no-experimental-webstorage npx --yes pnpm@9.15.9 build --locale en
  • git diff --check
  • verified both official Linux AMD64 and ARM64 archive URLs return HTTP 200
  • inspected the generated FAQ HTML to confirm the admonition and supported-platform anchor render correctly

@el-termikael

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! Thanks for your contribution.

We don’t accept pull requests submitted from forks of this repository. I’m closing this pull request for now.

Please clone the AdguardTeam/KnowledgeBaseDNS repository, create a branch in the main repository, and open a new pull request with your proposed changes. We’ll be happy to review it.

Thank you for your understanding.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants