Skip to content
View AliNaderiii's full-sized avatar
🎯
Focusing
🎯
Focusing

Block or report AliNaderiii

Block user

Prevent this user from interacting with your repositories and sending you notifications. Learn more about blocking users.

You must be logged in to block users.

Maximum 250 characters. Please don’t include any personal information such as legal names or email addresses. Markdown is supported. This note will only be visible to you.
Report abuse

Contact GitHub support about this user’s behavior. Learn more about reporting abuse.

Report abuse
AliNaderiii/README.md

Ali Naderi

AI Research Engineer | Data Scientist | M.Sc. Mechatronics Engineering

Physics-informed deep learning for industrial systems, medical imaging, and signal intelligence. Based in Dublin, Ireland.

Published Portfolio LinkedIn ORCID Email

About

I turn raw physical signals into decisions engineers can defend. Most machine learning treats the sensor as a black box and the model as another one. My background in Mechatronics Engineering pushes the opposite way: I encode the physics of the system directly into the architecture, so the model behaviour traces back to something mechanical and real. The result is systems that stay accurate under industrial noise, run on modest hardware, and survive review by people who know the machine better than the model.

  • Peer-reviewed CAD system for brain tumour classification, 98.16 percent four-class accuracy
  • Fault-diagnosis network holding 99.72 percent accuracy where noise is ten times stronger than the signal
  • Currently extending physics-informed architectures to rotating machinery and drilling telemetry

Publications

Convolutional Neural Network and Channel Attention Mechanism for Multiclass Brain Tumor Classification Complexity (Wiley), Volume 2025. Open Access. Published 30 June 2025. Naderi A., Asgharzadeh-Bonab A., Ahmadi F., Kalbkhani H. Fine-tuned EfficientNetB7 with a channel attention module that amplifies clinically relevant tumour features, validated by 5-fold stratified cross-validation across three MRI benchmarks.

Method Architecture Accuracy
Kang et al. 2021 DenseNet-169 + ShuffleNet + MnasNet 91.58%
Irmak 2021 Custom CNN 92.66%
Shahin et al. 2023 MPCANet (PCANet + CNN) 94.02%
Demir and Akbulut 2022 R-CNN + SVM 96.60%
This work EfficientNetB7 + CAM + FC 98.16%

DOI Materials PhyQ-TransNet: Physics-Informed Deep Learning for Intelligent Fault Diagnosis International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture (Elsevier). Manuscript submitted, under review. A physics-informed feature extractor coupled to a Transformer encoder, mathematically aligned with classical signal demodulation rather than learned from scratch. Evaluated on five international bearing benchmarks: CWRU, SGST, IMS, Paderborn, NBS.

Metric Result
Accuracy across five benchmarks 99.98%
Real-fault accuracy, calibration ECE 0.0047 99.03%
Accuracy under extreme noise at -10 dB SNR 99.72%
Inference latency 8.5 ms, about 117 FPS
Model size 1.4M parameters, 3.21 GFLOPs

Projects

Project Approach Result Links
Brain Tumor Classification EfficientNetB7 with channel attention on MRI 98.16% four-class Repo - Paper
Traffic Density Estimation YOLO11 Nano with OpenCV dual-lane ROI counting 97.4% mAP50, ONNX 10.1 MB Repo - Live
Heart Disease Prediction Stacking ensemble decision support on UCI Cleveland Recall-optimised, zero leakage Repo - Live
Rice Production Forecasting Hybrid SARIMAX with Random Forest residual coupling R2 0.9254, MAPE 5.12% Repo - Live
WHO Health Intelligence Production ETL over WHO GHO OData, live and demo data modes Idempotent SQLite with quality audits Repo
ROGII Wellbore Geology Lithology prediction from drilling telemetry Well-group cross-validation isolation Repo
Smart Farming Analytics Yield modelling with statistical signal audit Proved feature independence Repo - Live
Dream Local-first bilingual assistant with Persian-aware memory retrieval NFKC normalisation, zero-dependency core Repo

On the Smart Farming result: the dataset carried no predictive signal. Mutual information near zero, negative out-of-sample R2. I published the negative result and the overfitting curves rather than reporting a tuned score. Reporting what the data actually supports is part of the job.

How I work

Validation discipline. Chronological and group-wise splits, never random shuffles on temporal or clustered data. ColumnTransformer pipelines so scaling never sees the test fold. VIF and multicollinearity audits before inference. Deployment realism. ONNX export for cross-platform C++ and OpenCV serving. Models sized for accessible hardware such as GTX 1650 and Intel i5, not cloud clusters. Edge-compatible inference budgets. Honest reporting. Negative results published alongside positive ones. Calibration error reported next to accuracy. Scope statements that say what a system is not validated for.

Stack

Python PyTorch TensorFlow scikit-learn OpenCV ONNX XGBoost LightGBM statsmodels Pandas NumPy SciPy MATLAB SQL Streamlit Docker Git

Domain depth

Area Methods
Signal processing FFT, Hilbert-Huang Transform, wavelet decomposition, time-frequency analysis, envelope demodulation, multi-sensor fusion
Predictive maintenance Bearing fault diagnosis, condition monitoring, noise-robust classification, CWRU, IMS, Paderborn, SGST and NBS benchmarks
Medical imaging Transfer learning, channel attention, computer-aided diagnosis design, stratified cross-validation
Time series SARIMAX, exogenous forecasting, residual hybrid coupling, stationarity testing, chronological validation
Statistics Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square with Cramer V, Spearman rank, Q-Q normality, mutual information, ADF

Contact

Open to research collaboration, industrial AI, and hard diagnostic problems. alinaderi119@gmail.com | Portfolio | LinkedIn | Kaggle | ResearchGate

Pinned Loading

  1. AliNaderiii.github.io AliNaderiii.github.io Public

    HTML 1