Audit: rc.2 full design, system, and Compatibility review

[Bboy9090]

Scope

Full release-grade audit of frozen application candidate 2e02d1023ddeb4e453236c34f2d4d2b7f6948957 covering:

• design-system consistency and visual drift;
• wording/terminology consistency and repetition;
• Compatibility information architecture and evidence boundary;
• client/server/runtime integration;
• native API configuration;
• test/CI blind spots;
• deployment identity and release-gate gaps;
• missing features/contracts worth adding.

Critical finding

Live probe run 31967378736 proves the configured Railway backend is healthy at /health but returns HTTP 404 for /api/compatibility/ping. The latest Railway deployment surfaced through GitHub predates rc.2. This explains the reported broken Compatibility path. Tracked as #213.

Additional confirmed defect

Compatibility drops deterministic Life Paths 11/22/33 before scoring even though the Foundation profile and scoring engine support those master numbers. Tracked as #214.

This PR

• adds governance/release-audits/RC2-FULL-DESIGN-SPEC-SYSTEM-AUDIT.md;
• preserves the read-only live Compatibility probe workflow used to generate the deployment evidence;
• makes no application-code, release-version, signing, or artifact changes.

Any application correction must advance a new native candidate/build identity rather than mutate signed rc.2.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 51e2661585

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Verify the deployed SHA before labeling the receipt frozen

When this workflow is rerun after any deployment other than 2e02d102..., this step merely prints the frozen SHA while every subsequent request probes the mutable production URL; because /health exposes no release identity, a different backend with compatible response shapes can pass and produce an artifact named as an rc.2 receipt. Assert a deployment-reported SHA/API contract (or probe an immutable candidate target) before treating the run as evidence for the frozen candidate.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L94-L94

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.