Skip to content

add(models): add AT model - #588

Open
palkerecsenyi wants to merge 1 commit into
CERNDocumentServer:masterfrom
palkerecsenyi:at
Open

add(models): add AT model#588
palkerecsenyi wants to merge 1 commit into
CERNDocumentServer:masterfrom
palkerecsenyi:at

Conversation

@palkerecsenyi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes #424

@palkerecsenyi
palkerecsenyi force-pushed the at branch 2 times, most recently from d414be7 to cc620d6 Compare August 26, 2026 09:58
@palkerecsenyi
palkerecsenyi marked this pull request as ready for review August 26, 2026 09:59
(710__.5:NPA OR 710__.5:AT)
-710__.5:SI -710__.5:SC -710__.5:SL -710__.5:PS -710__.5:MPS -710__.5:ISR -710__.5:MSC -710__.5:AC -710__.5:SPS
-710__.5:LEP -710__.5:AB -710__.5:AR -710__.5:TS -710__.5:ST -710__.5:MT -710__.5:EST -710__.5:SB -710__.5:LHC
-980__:DELETED -980__.c:MIGRATED -980__c:MERGED

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we remove the migrated?

Comment on lines +28 to +45
"030__a", # coden designation
"260__b", # Always CERN
"300__b", # Resolution of the video
"340__a", # Physical medium
"518__h", # Start time of meeting/conference event
"518__g", # Meeting/conference identification
"520__9", # Source of the additional description (e.g. arxiv)
"542__3", # Part of the license
"595__i", # INSPEC number
"773__a", # Duplicate DOI
"901__u", # Affiliation at Conversion?
"913__y", # citation
"913__v", # citation
"913__t", # citation
"913__a", # citation
"913__c", # citation
"964__a", # number of physical copies
"970__b", # spreadsheet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are we sure about these before curators see them? @kpsherva

)

# TODO: should we still set as the main publication date if it's uncertain?
publication_date = normalize(publication_date_str)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we accept EDTF on publication date?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no we don't

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so the normalize strips it out? I think we having the extra date there at least we have some proof of the uncertainty.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

migration: Accelerator technology (AT)

3 participants