⚡ Bolt: 정적 자원 추출을 통한 루프 성능 최적화 - #344
Conversation
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 18 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Comment |
💡 What:
process_dir함수 내에서 매번 생성되던 정적 CSS 문자열과 SHA-256 해시 계산 로직을StaticAssets라는private object로 추출했습니다.🎯 Why: 기존에는 디렉토리를 순회할 때마다 크기가 큰 CSS 문자열을 새로 할당하고 무거운 SHA-256 해시 계산을 반복 수행하여 메모리 및 CPU 낭비가 발생했습니다.
📊 Impact: 디렉토리 처리 시 문자열 재할당 및 해시 계산 오버헤드를 제거하여, 디렉토리가 많은 환경에서 전체 처리 속도가 향상되고 가비지 컬렉터 부하가 감소합니다.
🔬 Measurement: 수많은 하위 디렉토리를 포함하는 트리 구조에서
html4tree실행 시 소요 시간 및 메모리 사용량 측정을 통해 개선을 확인할 수 있습니다.PR created automatically by Jules for task 12349328697022599696 started by @seonghobae