fix: enable enableEdgeToEdgeBottomSafeAreaPadding

[truph01]

Explanation of Change

• Based on the edge-to-edge bottom safe area padding handling, and a follow-up to part 1.

This is part 2 of migrating the app to edge-to-edge bottom safe area handling. No new infrastructure is added — this reuses the enableEdgeToEdgeBottomSafeAreaPadding plumbing merged in part 1, and applies it to the next batch of menus and modals. In each case the bottom safe area padding is moved off the modal container and onto the scrollable / bottom-docked content, so the content sits correctly above the Android navigation bar in edge-to-edge mode.

Enabled edge-to-edge for the following components:

Dropdown & popover menus (PopoverMenu)

1. ButtonWithDropdownMenu (shared dropdown used across many call sites; also removes its now-redundant manual safe area padding)
2. AddPaymentMethodMenu
3. AvatarWithImagePicker
4. AttachmentPickerWithMenuItems (composer + menu)
5. CopilotPage (delegate / delegator menus)
6. ConnectToNetSuiteFlow
7. ConnectToCertiniaFlow
8. SearchTypeMenuNarrow
9. SearchActionsBarCreateButton
10. SearchSelectAllMenu

Dialog modals (bottom-docked Modal)
11. DecisionModal
12. ProactiveAppReviewModal
13. ExportDownloadStatusModal
14. ReportPDFDownloadModal
15. RequireTwoFactorAuthenticationModal
16. BaseOpenAppFailureModal

Mobile selection ("Select") long-press menus
17. useRowLongPressMenu
18. Table
19. MoneyRequestReportTransactionList / MoneyRequestReportTransactionLongPressModal

Pickers (PopoverWithMeasuredContent + selection list)
20. CategoryPickerModal
21. TagPickerModal (with a new addBottomSafeAreaPadding prop on TagPicker, mirroring CategoryPicker)

Other PopoverWithMeasuredContent callers
22. FABPopoverMenu (global + create menu)
23. useReportSubmitToPopover (submit-to-approver popover)
24. FilterPopupButton (Search filter dropdowns)

The remaining modals/menus (e.g. FeatureTrainingModal, the v2 PopoverMenu content, and the VideoPlayer playback menu) will be handled in follow-up PRs.

Fixed Issues

$ #64241
PROPOSAL:

Tests

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
  • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
  • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

[truph01]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 32873b3954

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Enable edge-to-edge mode for this padded modal

On devices with a nonzero bottom safe-area inset, this wrapper adds the inset through useBottomSafeSafeAreaPaddingStyle, while the bottom-docked Modal still applies its default safe-area padding because enableEdgeToEdgeBottomSafeAreaPadding was not set. Opening the transaction long-press menu therefore produces double bottom spacing; enable edge-to-edge mode on this modal as done for the other migrated bottom-docked menus.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[truph01]

Resolved in 05f009a

[melvin-bot]

@shubham1206agra Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]