Skip to content

docs: unbundle the weight table so it mirrors scan.mjs (15 checks, 93 points) - #21

Merged
FetchDoge merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/weight-table-mirror-code
Oct 18, 2026
Merged

FetchDoge merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/weight-table-mirror-code

Conversation

@FetchDoge

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Two bundled rows in the README weight table carried only one check's weight each: HTTPS + llms-full.txt shown as 4 (code: 4+4) and ai.txt + security.txt + agent hints + robots-declared sitemap shown as 3 (code: 3+3+3+3). The table's own arithmetic read 80 while the text claimed 93.

Each of the 15 checks now has its own row with the exact weight from its add(...) call in scan.mjs. Table sum after this change: 93 — matching the code and the rest of the README. Docs only; no code touched.

…hecks, 93 points

Two bundled rows carried only one check's weight each (HTTPS + llms-full.txt shown as 4 instead of 4+4; ai.txt + security.txt + agent hints + robots sitemap shown as 3 instead of 3+3+3+3), so the table's own arithmetic read 80 while the text claimed 93. Each check now has its own row with the weight from its add(...) call in scan.mjs.
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 18, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-18T22:19:27.742209Z ee5a637 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@FetchDoge
FetchDoge merged commit 345705a into main Oct 18, 2026
4 checks passed
@FetchDoge
FetchDoge deleted the docs/weight-table-mirror-code branch October 18, 2026 22:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant