docs: choose the Python and Rust API boundary - #12
Open
jt55401 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Recommendation
Choose option 1 for v0.3.0: retain the deterministic canonicalizer boundary and document it prominently. Revisit payload construction when a Python or Rust publisher has a concrete owner and use case.
Review requested
Comment with
Decision: option 1,option 2,option 3, oroption 4, plus any capability that must block v0.3.0.Validation
make checkgit diff --checkAI assistance: Codex drafted the document and checked its claims against the current binding APIs, manifests, and shared conformance suite.