Repository navigation
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thanks for this; it shaped #1017, which takes the Studio work in a different Closing this in favor of #1017. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Read the RFC: Studio — a local graph UI served by the CLI
This RFC proposes
omnigraph studio: a local browser UI for inspecting and editing graph records. Boot mode serves an applied local cluster folder; attach mode connects to an existing server using the CLI's stored credentials. The first public release includes cell edits, adding rows, and deleting rows through the existing conditional mutation API.Three decisions need maintainer approval before implementation:
412shows a conflict and reloads without retrying. Keys remain immutable, and edge edits follow the server's supported mutation rules. Already-served clusters use attach mode.Implementation plans:
These plans describe the proposed implementation and validation for each part of the design. The RFC establishes the scope and architectural boundaries; implementation details can be refined during code review. Merging the draft does not itself accept the design.