Skip to content
View PKusch's full-sized avatar
  • London
  • 14:07 (UTC -12:00)

Block or report PKusch

Block user

Prevent this user from interacting with your repositories and sending you notifications. Learn more about blocking users.

You must be logged in to block users.

Content in all repositories owned by your account will be closed.
Maximum 250 characters. Please don’t include any personal information such as legal names or email addresses. Markdown is supported. This note will only be visible to you.
Report abuse

Contact GitHub support about this user’s behavior. Learn more about reporting abuse.

Report abuse
PKusch/README.md

I build the parts of an agent system that decide what the agent is allowed to do — and I publish the measurements, including the ones that went against me.

Most of what is here is governance and consent infrastructure for AI agents: what an agent may do without asking anyone, how the person it does ask is protected from being lied to, and how to write down what went wrong afterwards so that two engineers looking at the same incident record the same thing. I came to it from a career delivering change inside banks, which is where I learned that the failures worth worrying about are the quiet ones.

Everything here is public, MIT unless the repo says otherwise, and runs from a clean clone.


Selected work

What it does Why it matters
sequela Tests whether an AI agent can say what its own next action will do, and then acts on what it said. The right answer is worked out from the tool itself, so there is no judge to argue with. 251 test calls; no live model has been run yet, and the README says so first.
airlock Shows a person, in plain words, what an agent's tool call will do before it runs. The words are built from the facts of the call, not written by the agent, so the agent cannot talk anyone into approving it. Tested against 36 real tools nobody here wrote, which found four defects the home-made tests never could.
remit A rulebook for what an AI agent may do without asking a person, mapped to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 and DORA. Two engineers looking at the same failure write it up the same way: four independent assessors agreed at 0.83, where 0.61 counts as good.
tendere-ai Matches consultants to work by what they can do, how recently, and what proves it, instead of one score. It can tell never done it from did it years ago from can do it but cannot prove it, and shows leaders which scarce skills people have but cannot yet prove. Built for a hackathon on made-up data, and the README says so.
terroir-study A map for studying wine, for the WSET Level 3 exam: France, Italy, Spain, Germany and the New World. Click a region, zoom in to its villages, follow the chain from climate to what is in the glass, then get quizzed on the why. 165 questions that remember what you got wrong, and a tasting drill marked against the grape.
berghain-bouncer A voice doorman for a Berlin techno club that turns almost everyone away. Built in under an hour at a meetup. The verdict is stamped on screen, so the agent acts rather than just talks.

Background

Management consulting: AI, product and financial-services transformation. Large-scale change in regulated environments — business analysis, product delivery, agile ways of working, operating-model modernisation across enterprise programmes. Regulatory literacy (DORA, EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001) is why the governance work above is grounded rather than theoretical.

Pinned Loading

  1. tendere-ai tendere-ai Public

    Consulting bench engine that maps people instead of ranking them: level, recency and evidence per capability, three kinds of gap, provision gaps surfaced to leadership.

    Python 1

  2. terroir-study terroir-study Public

    Map-first study tool for WSET Level 3. Click a region, follow the chain from climate to glass, then get quizzed on the why. Hand-projected SVG map, no UI libraries.

    JavaScript