Bugfix/FOUR-25060: When we create a PMBlock from a process with alternatives A and B, the pmblock is created only with alternative B

[CarliPinell]

Solution

When process is created with Alternatives A and B, from now on when PM Block is created from Modeler with option "Save as PM Block", depending on whether we are on the Alternative A or B tab, the PM block is generated with the process of each alternative.

How to Test

1. Log in
2. Go to Designer
3. Click on Process
4. Create a new process
5. Create a alternative A and B
6. Save process. with Alternative A / B
7. Create a Pmblcok with that process
8. Open the Pmblock

Related Ticket

https://processmaker.atlassian.net/browse/FOUR-25060

ci:package-pm-blocks:bugfix/FOUR-25060
ci:deploy

Code Review Checklist

• I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
• This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
• This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
• This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
• This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
• This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
• This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
• This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
• This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

[eiresendez]

Looks good to merge. The PR now sends the selected AB alternative from the modal and the controller fetches the matching BPMN version (defaulting to A), so PM blocks won’t default to alternative B anymore.

[vladyrichter]

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-4c571dd418.engk8s.processmaker.net

[vladyrichter]

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-4c571dd418.engk8s.processmaker.net

[processmaker-sonarqube]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

[sanjacornelius]

Closing PR no longer needed based on this ticket comment