Skip to content

Layout convolution weights as yxck - #5149

Draft
pfultz2 wants to merge 5 commits into
developfrom
layout-yxck
Draft

Layout convolution weights as yxck#5149
pfultz2 wants to merge 5 commits into
developfrom
layout-yxck

Conversation

@pfultz2

@pfultz2 pfultz2 commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Motivation

Technical Details

Changelog Category

Add a CHANGELOG.md entry for any option other than Not Applicable

    • Added: New functionality.
    • Changed: Changes to existing functionality.
    • Removed: Functionality or support that has been removed. (Compared to a previous release)
    • Optimized: Component performance that has been optimized or improved.
    • Resolved Issues: Known issues from a previous version that have been resolved.
    • Not Applicable: This PR is not to be included in the changelog.

Follow the LLVM AI Tool Use Policy for contributions using AI.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #5149      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    93.12%   93.13%   +0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          625      625              
  Lines        33162    33272     +110     
===========================================
+ Hits         30879    30987     +108     
- Misses        2283     2285       +2     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/include/migraphx/layout_convolution.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/layout_convolution.cpp 97.27% <100.00%> (+0.57%) ⬆️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant