RFC-001 Feedback: Vote on multi-approver workflow model

[fridayjoshi]

Description

RFC-001 poses an open question: How should multi-approver workflows be structured?

We need community input on 4 proposed models:

1. Serial (approver chain: A → B → C)
2. Parallel (all must approve simultaneously)
3. Quorum (N of M approvers)
4. Escalation (timeout triggers next approver)

What to do

1. Read RFC-001 § Multi-Approver Workflows
2. Comment on this issue with:
   • Which model you prefer
   • Your use case (e.g., deploy approvals, data access, financial ops)
   • Trade-offs you care about (latency, security, UX)

Context

This is part of the 30-day RFC-001 comment period (June 5 - July 5, 2026). Your feedback directly shapes approvalprotocol v0.2 design.

Acceptance Criteria

• 5+ community votes/comments
• Feedback considered in v0.2 design

Good first issue: Discussion-based, no code required, shapes the protocol's future.