securebit_core

Platform-agnostic cryptographic kernel for secure peer-to-peer communication.

securebit_core holds every security-critical operation behind SecureBit.chat: the authenticated key exchange, message and file encryption, and the short authentication string used to detect a man in the middle. It carries no UI, no transport and no platform dependency, so the same audited code runs on desktop, mobile and headless deployments — and so this repository is the only place a reviewer needs to look.

License: Apache-2.0 · Minimum Rust: 1.70 · Security model: SECURITY_MODEL.md · Threat model: THREAT_MODEL.md

---

Contents

• Scope
• Where to look when auditing
• Cryptographic primitives
• Web client compatibility
• Installation
• Usage
• Verifying compatibility
• Security model
• Reporting a vulnerability
• Applications built on this core
• License

---

Scope

Being precise about the boundary matters more than a long feature list: it tells a reviewer where to look, and where there is nothing to find.

In this crate

Area	What it covers
Key exchange	Ephemeral ECDH P-384, ECDSA P-384 signatures over the key packages, HKDF-SHA-256 key schedule
Session keys	Separate message, MAC, metadata and fingerprint keys derived from one shared secret
Messages	AES-256-GCM payload, separately encrypted metadata, HMAC-SHA-256 over the canonical payload
Verification	Short authentication string derived from the shared secret and both DTLS fingerprints
Files and voice notes	Per-file key derivation, per-chunk AES-256-GCM, SHA-256 integrity over the whole file
Sessions	Several independent, fully isolated sessions in one process

Deliberately not in this crate

• Transport. The crate produces and consumes JSON and SB1: messages; moving them over a WebRTC data channel is the platform layer's job.
• Audio and video calls. Call media rides DTLS-SRTP on the same peer connection whose fingerprints this crate authenticates during the handshake, and call signalling travels as ordinary encrypted messages. There is no media code here — do not expect to find any.
• Storage and I/O. Nothing is written to disk, and no network call is ever made from this crate.
• UI. No rendering, no input handling, no platform APIs.

---

Where to look when auditing

File	Size	What to review
src/webrtc.rs	~1470 lines	Offer/answer construction, signature verification, ECDH, SAS derivation
src/file_transfer.rs	~610 lines	Transfer state machine, consent, chunk validation, integrity check
src/session.rs	~360 lines	Message encryption and decryption, metadata protection, MAC
src/core.rs	~315 lines	Public API surface and session isolation
src/crypto.rs	~300 lines	Key-pair generation, generic encrypt/decrypt helpers
src/file_crypto.rs	~110 lines	Key fingerprint and per-file key derivation, chunk encryption

State lives in three places, all behind Arc<Mutex<_>> and none of it persisted: crypto state (key pairs), offer state (ECDH secret, session salt, DTLS fingerprint) and session keys (message, MAC, metadata keys, key fingerprint, verification code).

---

Cryptographic primitives

Purpose	Primitive
Key agreement	ECDH, NIST P-384, ephemeral per session
Authentication of key packages	ECDSA P-384 with SHA-384
Key derivation	HKDF-SHA-256, 64-byte session salt, distinct info label per derived key
Message confidentiality	AES-256-GCM, fresh 12-byte nonce per message
Message integrity	HMAC-SHA-256 over the canonicalized payload, plus the GCM tag
File chunks	AES-256-GCM, fresh nonce per chunk, SHA-256 over the whole file
MITM detection	7-digit SAS from HKDF over the shared secret and both DTLS fingerprints

Forward secrecy comes from the ephemeral ECDH key pair: it exists only for the lifetime of a session and is never persisted, so compromising the device later does not decrypt traffic captured earlier.

All primitives come from the RustCrypto ecosystem (p384, aes-gcm, hkdf, hmac, sha2), with rand for randomness. There is no unsafe code and no platform-specific dependency.

---

Web client compatibility

The crate implements the same wire protocol as the SecureBit.chat web client, so a desktop peer built on it interoperates with a browser peer in either direction. The compatibility surface is byte-exact:

• Offer and answer packages — identical compact field layout and SB1:gz: / SB1:bin: encoding.
• Signed key exchange — ECDH P-384 public keys packaged and ECDSA-signed (SHA-384) over the same canonical, insertion-ordered JSON the web verifier reconstructs.
• Key schedule — HKDF-SHA-256 with the same info labels and 64-byte salt, truncating the P-384 shared secret to 32 bytes exactly as the Web Crypto API does.
• Verification code — derived from the dedicated fingerprint key and the peers' real DTLS fingerprints (colon-separated, lowercased), so both implementations reach the same code.
• Messages — AES-256-GCM payloads with separately encrypted metadata and an HMAC-SHA-256 over the canonicalized payload.
• Files and voice notes — the same per-file key derivation, chunk framing and file_transfer_* message shapes.

Voice notes are ordinary file transfers: the recording is encrypted and chunked through the pipeline above, so it inherits exactly the same guarantees as any other file.

---

Installation

[dependencies]
securebit_core = { git = "https://github.com/SecureBitChat/securebit-core" }

---

Usage

Every call takes an optional session id. Pass None for the default session, or Some("id") to run several conversations at once — sessions share no key material.

Establishing a session

use securebit_core::Core;

let core = Core::new();

// Initiator: create an invitation. Passing the real WebRTC SDP binds the
// verification code to the actual DTLS fingerprints, which is what makes it
// meaningful.
let offer = core.create_secure_offer(None, Some(local_offer_sdp))?;

// Responder: derive the session keys and produce an answer.
let answer = core.join_secure_connection(None, offer, Some(local_answer_sdp))?;

// Initiator: verify the answer's signature and complete the key schedule.
let confirmation = core.handle_secure_answer(None, answer)?;

Verifying the peer

Both sides derive the verification code independently. Show it to the user and have them compare it with the other party over a channel an attacker cannot control — in person, or a call where they recognise the voice. Only then treat the session as authenticated.

let crypto = core.get_session_crypto(None);
let code = crypto["verificationCode"].as_str().unwrap_or("");

A code taken from the wire is not a verification. It must be the one this peer computed for itself, or an attacker in the middle can simply show both sides the same number.

Messages

let encrypted = core.encrypt_enhanced_message(
    None,
    "Hello".to_string(),
    "msg-1".to_string(),
    sequence_number,
)?;

let decrypted = core.decrypt_enhanced_message(None, encrypted)?;

Sequence numbers must increase; the receiving side uses them to reject replays.

Files and voice notes

The crate owns the cryptography and the state machine. Reading the file and moving the resulting messages over the data channel is the caller's job.

// Sender
let start = core.file_prepare_outgoing(None, file_id.clone(), name, mime, data_base64)?;
while let Ok(chunk) = core.file_next_chunk(None, file_id.clone()) {
    // send `chunk` over the data channel
}

// Receiver
let event = core.file_handle_incoming(None, message_json)?;
core.file_accept(None, file_id)?;   // or file_reject(..)

Nothing is buffered before the receiving side accepts, so an unwanted transfer costs no memory.

---

Verifying compatibility

cargo test

The suite pins the properties an audit should care about:

Test	What it proves
offer_e_signature_is_web_verifiable	Key packages verify under the web client's exact reconstruction
answer_e_signature_is_web_verifiable	The same, for the answering side
offer_join_handle_roundtrip	Full handshake; both sides reach the same keys
both_peers_derive_the_same_sas_independently	Neither peer takes the verification code from the wire
sas_matches_web_reference_vector	The code equals the web implementation's output for a fixed input
sas_is_orientation_independent	Fingerprint order cannot change the code
key_fingerprint_matches_web_reference	File-key derivation matches the web client byte for byte
chunk_aes_gcm_matches_web	Chunk encryption is interoperable
full_round_trip	A file survives the whole pipeline intact
duplicate_chunk_is_idempotent	A replayed chunk cannot corrupt the result
corrupted_chunk_fails_decryption	Tampering is detected rather than silently accepted
rejection_stops_transfer	Refusal leaves no state behind

---

Security model

Guaranteed here: confidentiality and integrity of messages and files under the derived session keys; authentication of the key exchange; forward secrecy from ephemeral keys; a deterministic verification code for MITM detection; strict validation of every input parsed from the wire.

Not guaranteed here, and out of scope by design:

• Compromised operating system, hardware, or a malicious peer device
• Malicious or compromised UI in the embedding application
• Side channels: timing, power, cache
• Memory disclosure of the host process
• Denial of service and resource exhaustion
• Network-level attacks beyond what the protocol itself detects

SECURITY_MODEL.md and THREAT_MODEL.md cover both lists in detail.

---

Reporting a vulnerability

Please report privately rather than opening a public issue.

• Email: security@securebit.chat
• Include a description, the affected commit, and a reproduction if you have one
• Responsible disclosure, 90-day window

---

Applications built on this core

Application	Repository	Notes
Web client	securebit-chat	Fully open source, MIT
Desktop apps	securebit-desktop	Windows, macOS, Linux

The desktop applications are proprietary wrappers — UI and platform integration only. Every cryptographic operation they perform comes from this repository, which is what makes an audit of this crate meaningful for them too.

Mobile applications and store distribution are planned; their cryptography will come from here as well.

---

License

Apache-2.0. See LICENSE.