docs(post-intake): re-audit project completion after donor intake

[TheHalfMoon]

Six-file post-intake re-audit candidate authorized by merged PR #651 (base b2d2d02).

Re-audit (25 criteria, derived from rows by parse: OpenReview 5/8/2 of 15, master-plan 7/3 of 10):

• PROVEN 12 / PARTIAL 11 / MISSING 0 / NOT_APPLICABLE 2 / TOTAL 25
• Exactly one upgrade: EXACT_DONOR_MAPPING PARTIAL to PROVEN (attestation PR feat donor: add exact donor-mapping attestation proof #643 + gap coverage PR feat(donor): intake 11 PORT gaps as candidate ledger records #649 full matrix plus push SUCCESS; sole strong-derivation header covered; study files marker-free; tool pins closed; notices complete; empty pin set fail-closes future gaps). Candidate-status caveat recorded without normalization; zero inherited credit.
• No other row upgraded; O4 live proof stays deferred external edge.

Local qualification: exact 6-path scope; counts re-derived by parse; fences/table rows validated; provenance PASS; ruff PASS. Awaiting exact-head required checks and substantive review.

---

Summary by cubic

Re-audits project completion after donor intake, upgrading EXACT_DONOR_MAPPING from PARTIAL to PROVEN and bringing the canonical audit to 12 PROVEN / 11 PARTIAL / 0 MISSING / 2 NOT_APPLICABLE across all 25 criteria.

• Updates the completion audit and all roadmap and product status documents to reflect the closed donor intake and reconciliation milestones.
• Records the candidate-status caveat for EXACT_DONOR_MAPPING without normalizing it or claiming inherited credit.
• No other criteria changed; the O4 live proof remains deferred as an external edge case.

^{Written for commit 43ae2f5. Summary will update on new commits.}

[qodo-code-review]

ⓘ Qodo reviews are paused because your trial has ended. Ask your workspace admin to add credits to resume reviews. Manage billing

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: f4f6a7f6-8c01-4af8-acbe-d07c35e025f2

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[TheHalfMoon]

Substantive exact-head review at 43ae2f5 (base main b2d2d02, verified unmoved before review). COMMENTED review by the implementing agent's verification pass; not a second-party approval.

Scope verified: exactly the six PR #651-allowlisted paths (audit + NEXT + ROADMAP + MILESTONES + VERSION_PLAN + STATUS); no source/test/schema/workflow/dependency mutation. Required checks provenance, legacy-tests, k2-runtime-gate SUCCESS at this exact head; runtime SKIPPED (docs-only, correct); MERGEABLE/CLEAN.

Claim verification, with adversarial attention on the single upgrade:

1. Counts re-derived by independent parse: OpenReview 15 rows (5 PROVEN / 8 PARTIAL / 2 N/A), master-plan 10 rows (7 PROVEN / 3 PARTIAL); totals 12/11/0/2/25 match every summary block. TOTAL 25 preserved.
2. Donor upgrade stress test: the row's stated boundary through PR #645 was attestation plus gap coverage. Attestation closed via PR #643 (own matrix/push evidence); all 11 gaps closed via PR #649 (own full matrix plus push evidence, 11/11 mirror-verified, pin set emptied). Corroborating re-scan: sole strong-derivation header covered, study files marker-free, tool pins closed, notices complete. No element borrows credit from any other.
3. Candidate-status objection considered: the 11 records are status candidate, and the row text says so explicitly with lifecycle advancement reserved as separate rigor. The criterion is mapping completeness (its name and its stated boundary), which is now mechanically enforced in CI by the empty pin set; lifecycle maturity is a different axis the row never required. Upgrading on mapping evidence while recording the lifecycle caveat is the honest reading, not normalization.
4. Lineage SHAs for PRs #645-#651 re-verified against live GitHub state this session (merges 47e74f6, 6bc62b5, b11a048, 3050afb, 06a7f8f, 0dd5301, b2d2d02); push evidence cited matches observed runs. No other row upgraded; O4 live proof stays deferred with POST budget 0; no secrets, releases, or completion claims.

Material findings: none. Verdict: CLEAN at exact head 43ae2f5. May proceed to guarded expected-head merge.

[TheHalfMoon]

Fresh post-intake successor analysis (ANALYSIS_ONLY, no authority granted).

Ledger after this closure: PROVEN 12 / PARTIAL 11 / MISSING 0 / NOT_APPLICABLE 2 / TOTAL 25.

Dependency graph for the 11 remaining PARTIAL rows (actual edges, O4-first ordering superseded by PR #637):

• PROVIDER_NEUTRAL_READ_ONLY_REVIEW: live credential-generality proof BLOCKED_EXTERNAL (founder-secret edge, O4 procedure PR docs o4: prepare credential-generality live-proof procedure #641 ready, POST budget 0 until founder-local run). Separable implementation remainder (multi-head authority, release, deployment) has no secret edge: READY for fresh bounded scoping authorization.
• ADMITTED_SANDBOX_CLEANUP_PROOF (O5): no secret edge. READY for fresh bounded adapter authorization (local/fake backend first; real-backend proof classified when reached).
• AUTHENTICATED_REPLAY_SAFE_EVENT_INGESTION / DURABLE_WORKFLOW_RETRY_RESUME_LEASE_CANCELLATION_MIGRATION / CONTINUOUS_FRESHNESS_INVALIDATION: hinge on durable persistence + deployed ingress product-posture decisions (persistence currently N/A by posture). BLOCKED_DEPENDENCY on those decisions; each decision is unblockable via its own fresh bounded authorization. No secret edge.
• TRUST_GATED_SKILLS: SKILL_* gates closed by default per AGENTS.md authority rules. READY for fresh bounded execution-runtime authorization. No secret edge.
• ADVERSARIAL_BENCHMARKS + master-plan row 3: benchmark infrastructure is within ordinary founder continuation. READY for fresh bounded benchmark-execution authorization. No secret edge.
• SEPARATE_CURRENT_VIEW_AND_RELEASE_PROOF: hinges on release-scope product decision. READY for fresh release-scoping authorization. No secret edge.
• Master-plan row 7 (hybrid deterministic+contextual security validation): needs contextual-lane implementation authorization. READY for fresh bounded authorization. No secret edge.
• Master-plan row 2 (roadmap sync): PARTIAL by construction; handled by each future reconciliation.

READY_WORK: 7+ authorization units with no O4-secret edge (O5 adapter, benchmark execution, skill runtime, release scoping, persistence/ingress decisions x3 grouped, hybrid security lane, O4 multi-head remainder scoping). Smallest well-defined next unit: O5 admitted-sandbox adapter authorization (single product-path adapter, local-backend-first, mirroring the PR #646 bounded pattern).

O4 live proof: still DEFERRED_EXTERNAL_EDGE, procedure ready, budget 0. Dirty worktrees (~/Kodac-reseq-auth 1-line, ~/Kodac-live-20260914 4-file) preserved untouched throughout.