since re-stamped honestly: numeric rules 0.58.0 already held are retroactive; judge-ahead contracts target the 0.60 line - #48
Merged
Conversation
…ady (the contracts document shipped behaviour — retroactive, not requirements-first); C-306 and C-308..C-319 are judge-ahead and land in the 0.60 line (0.59.x is the incumbent's maintenance line per the owner's version strategy); contract-provenance is a regenerated ledger for the ratchet gate
… 126 to 131 (C-302..C-305, C-307 documented behaviour 0.58.0 already exhibited — the family's requirement was written after the behaviour shipped and is classed so), requirements-first 20 to 15
O6lvl4
force-pushed
the
since-honest-0.58-0.60
branch
from
August 21, 2026 03:12
7a2c483 to
332f79e
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Two corrections the strict reading of my own batches demands, plus new information from the owner's version strategy (relayed: 0.59.x = the incumbent's maintenance line; 0.60+ = the rebuilt compiler as successor).
sinceis the behaviour's release, not the entry's; labelling themrequirements-firstbecause the tag was not yet cut would have been gaming the metric.since = 0.58.0→ the provenance ledger now classes them retroactive (126 → 131; requirements-first 20 → 15). The ceiling raise is its own commit, as the ratchet-separation gate requires;proofs/contract-provenance.tomlis marked a regenerated ledger there (it is written by--write, so a dated comment line cannot live in it — the why is this commit message).since = 0.60.0. Still requirements-first (no tag exists).Net: the honest requirements-first count is 15, all of them behaviours no release has yet.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code