fix: prefer Yamux transport for headless account selection - #59
Open
cray-com wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
3 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
AccountSelectrequest fields through a small request builderRoot cause and reproduction
anytype-heartexposesPreferYamuxTransportspecifically for clients that have problems with QUIC, but the headless CLI never enabled it during bot-account auto-login. On a native Linux x86_64 VPS using the public Anytype Network, a fresh active member invite produced:A/B test with the same account and invite:
This also matches the existing escape-hatch comment in
anytype-heart: Yamux is intended for clients that encounter QUIC problems.Verification
PreferYamuxTransportis falsemake testgo vet ./...Fixes #36