Repository navigation
fix(v0.6): complete W43 SCRAM admission contract - #159
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 75b5ce3947
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
|
@codex review Please review exact source head |
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
…cope Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 225329347b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
|
@codex review Please review exact head |
- normalize exact-user ResourceNotFound to empty SCRAM metadata - require full mechanism absence before delete verification can resolve uncertainty - prove create/rotate/delete credentials with real SCRAM authentication - disambiguate provider SaslMechanism in the integration harness Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
536dd1a to
a9c6822
Compare
|
@codex review Fresh exact-head review requested after DCO-safe history repair. Please review |
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
|
@codex review Please review fresh exact head |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d8e3ea9370
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Heidari <ammar@arad-itc.org>
|
@codex review Please review fresh exact head |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Delightful! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Authority
Follow-up remediation for W43 under #157 / tracker #146. Scope #145 remains accepted/closed; planning #147 is admitted. PR #158 merged an incomplete SCRAM slice whose own body still marked W43 NOT MERGE READY; final W43 admission therefore remains withheld until this remediation passes governed evidence.
Remediation implemented on current head
Current head:
1dc96474ca0b2526e9a38678c86fe3997f82a7a3, basemain@bd6dd6c007ded83e65775934c4defa1b3e928368.OperationIdoverload for operation-bound SCRAM planning;ScramAlter;MutationDispatchService -> MutationExecutorpath; no delayed plaintext storage;ExecutionUnknowneven when mechanism/iteration metadata later matches; metadata never proves password equality;Local_Partialper-userResourceNotFoundto empty exact-user metadata; other partial/error shapes remain failures;Activation boundary
No public REST/OpenAPI/UI route and no default SCRAM handler/validator DI activation is introduced. W39 remains fail-closed unless W43 dependencies are explicitly injected; W49 retains public activation.
Final admission gate
W43 remains NOT YET ADMITTED COMPLETE until current-head applicable CI is green, substantive review is complete, required threads are resolved, and a fresh current-head CODEOWNER approval from
akhiabanchianexists.No release/tag/OCI publication is authorized.
Refs #157 #146 #145