docs(adr): replace unstable line anchors and fix slot launcher name - #463
docs(adr): replace unstable line anchors and fix slot launcher name#463bioedca wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Included review availability: 9 reviews are currently available. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 10 reviews per hour. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe ADR updates synchronize ChangesADR documentation updates
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This documentation-only change updates ADR anchors and terminology without changing runtime behavior or review rules. No actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Full details: Linked Issues checkExplanation The changes satisfy issue Full details: Out of Scope Changes checkExplanation The changes remain within issue Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (4 skipped: 4 unsupported.) Full details: Description checkExplanation The description is complete and relevant. It includes the summary, linked issue, risk, review status, change type, checklist, testing details, and lane state. It provides sufficient context for the documentation-only changes. Warning Git: CodeRabbit could not clone the repository, so clone-backed analysis was skipped and this review may be incomplete. Verify repository clone access, such as SSH credentials, before requesting another full review. If clone access is intentionally unavailable, use Comment |
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Action performedFull review finished. |
Biophysicist science-gate verdictSCIENCE-GATE: approve Head reviewed: Scientific assessment:
Retraction/editorial-status check (retrieved 2026-08-28): Consensus full records, PubMed records/search, and Crossref relations were checked for both cited primary studies. Neither record is marked retracted or under an expression of concern; PubMed returned no retraction/expression-of-concern/erratum publication-type match, and Crossref reports no retraction/update relation. |
|
Merge-block diagnosis (2026-09-05). Every required check is green, there are zero review threads, The fix is a re-signed commit carrying the identical tree, force-pushed over the branch. AGENTS.md forbids an agent from force-pushing and this session's classifier also refused the local rewrite, so it is a maintainer step (native Git Bash; in WSL the repo config already resolves the key, so drop the If |
Summary
The new ADR paragraph required by #453 is:
Linked tracking
b7a5a04727748c3ae15adf9e5318df2a25b8594ab7a5a04727748c3ae15adf9e5318df2a25b8594aand reported no issuesb7a5a04727748c3ae15adf9e5318df2a25b8594a, and created no review threadsdocs/adr/**is science-material by path; after the hosted review lane is complete, this lane stops gate-pending for the dispatcher rather than arming merge itselfType of change
docsfeatfix!/BREAKING CHANGE:Self-review checklist
mkdocs build --strictpasses.Testing
0; context-table header count0;Deep-LASIcount1; old launcher phrase count0; slot-launcher phrase count5; ADR 0057/0064 derived-vs-curated status equality[True, True]./opt/homebrew/bin/python3 scripts/gen_adr_index.py --check— passed (63 records).pytest tests/test_adr_index.py::test_all_adr_cross_links_resolve tests/test_adr_index.py::test_the_committed_index_matches_the_records— 2 passed.pre-commit run --all-files— passed.QT_QPA_PLATFORM=offscreen pytest -m "not large and not sidecar and not deep"— 2960 passed, 18 skipped, 34 deselected.mkdocs build --strict— passed with the pinned docs toolchain.Lane state
Hosted review is complete on
b7a5a04727748c3ae15adf9e5318df2a25b8594a: Codex is clean on that exact head, Greptile was skipped without a request because Tether is over its monthly allocation, and CodeRabbit’s completed full-review artifact reports no actionable comments on the same head. All required checks are green,origin/mainremains4e61ad11aa44e1348188eeb2f36879d9b2b4f738, and no review thread is outstanding. Thisdocs/adr/**diff is science-material by path, so the worker lane stops gate-pending for the science-gate dispatcher; merge is not armed here.Summary by CodeRabbit