Skip to content

Consider using the portable_atomic crate #82

Description

@nilssonk

Hello,

First of all, thank you for the crate!

Currently wiretun uses a few larger std::sync::atomic constructs, e.g. std::sync::atomic::AtomicU64, but some of my target platforms do not offer native 64-bit atomics. This means I have to vendor wiretun just to apply a very minimal set of changes and instead use portable_atomic. It would be nice if this was at least an optional feature.

Regards,
Kim

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions