Skip to content

chore(effect): bump published provider/sandbox pins to 0.4.20/0.4.23 - #233

Merged
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
effect-pins-sep23b
Sep 23, 2026
Merged

ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
effect-pins-sep23b

Conversation

@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow #228: bump the private, unpublished @coder/ai-sdk-effect package's published Coder pins to the just-released versions.

Effect is outside release-please, so this cuts no release.

Validation (Node v26.10.0, pnpm 11.27.0)

  • rm -rf node_modules && pnpm install --frozen-lockfile with an empty pnpm cache dir: lockfile passes supply-chain policies.
  • pnpm check, pnpm -r build, pnpm -r test (640 tests: agent 369, sandbox 191, effect 45, provider 22, release-please-ai 13), pnpm publint, pnpm attw: all pass.
  • Live e2e (packages/agent, dogfood.cdr.dev): results in a follow-up comment.

Generated with xum • Model: anthropic:claude-opus-5-5 • Thinking: high

Follow #228: update only the private Effect package's published Coder pins, exact release-age exceptions, lockfile, and pinned-version documentation.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski <tk@coder.com>

---
_Generated with [`xum`](https://github.com/coder/xum) • Model: `anthropic:claude-opus-5-5` • Thinking: `high`_

Change-Id: Ibc9bab7d7b6e612857d80792e875c9d295b66afc
@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-23T19:39:26.469054Z 0505563 Manual request
🔒 Security Review Completed 2026-09-23T19:42:43.823188Z 0505563 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Live e2e (cd packages/agent && npx vitest run test/e2e, Node v26.10.0, dogfood.cdr.dev) on head 0505563: 7/7 passed (1 run).


Generated with xum • Model: anthropic:claude-opus-5-5 • Thinking: high

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next?

Reviewed commit: 05055630c5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Codex Security Review

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 05055630c5

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@ThomasK33
ThomasK33 added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 23, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 2c1d888 Sep 23, 2026
6 checks passed
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33 deleted the effect-pins-sep23b branch September 23, 2026 19:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant