Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated dependency and devDependency versions across the ESLint configuration package, including ESLint plugins, parsers, formatters, and utilities. Pinned ChangesDependency Version Updates
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 59 minutes and 35 seconds.Comment |
|
✅ PR package published successfully! Install: View on npm: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@codfish/eslint-config/v/0.0.0-PR-153--9038c94 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
package.json (1)
110-113:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winRemove the now-orphaned
peerDependenciesMeta.prettierentry.
prettierwas removed frompeerDependencies, so thepeerDependenciesMeta.prettierblock no longer has any effect — npm only processes metadata for packages that are actually listed inpeerDependencies. Leaving it in place is misleading to consumers and tooling that generates install-time hints.🛠️ Proposed fix
"peerDependencies": { "eslint": ">= 10" }, - "peerDependenciesMeta": { - "prettier": { - "optional": true - } - },🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@package.json` around lines 110 - 113, Remove the now-orphaned peerDependenciesMeta.prettier entry: delete the "prettier" object from the peerDependenciesMeta block in package.json, and if that leaves peerDependenciesMeta empty remove the entire peerDependenciesMeta key so there are no misleading metadata entries; reference the peerDependenciesMeta and prettier keys when locating the entry to remove.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Line 64: The package.json currently declares "eslint": ">= 10" as a peer
requirement while depending on eslint-plugin-react (v7.37.5) which does not list
ESLint 10 in its peerDependencies; update package.json to either pin
eslint-plugin-react to a version that explicitly supports ESLint 10 or change
the peer eslint requirement to a range compatible with the plugin, and before
release verify that eslint-plugin-react has published a release declaring ESLint
10 support; refer to the dependency token "eslint-plugin-react" and the peer
field "eslint" in package.json when making the change.
---
Outside diff comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Around line 110-113: Remove the now-orphaned peerDependenciesMeta.prettier
entry: delete the "prettier" object from the peerDependenciesMeta block in
package.json, and if that leaves peerDependenciesMeta empty remove the entire
peerDependenciesMeta key so there are no misleading metadata entries; reference
the peerDependenciesMeta and prettier keys when locating the entry to remove.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
Summary by CodeRabbit