Skip to content

feat(utilities): add readGlobalFieldSchemas utility function#2650

Merged
cs-raj merged 4 commits into
v2-devfrom
enhc/DX-9464
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

feat(utilities): add readGlobalFieldSchemas utility function#2650
cs-raj merged 4 commits into
v2-devfrom
enhc/DX-9464

Conversation

@cs-raj

@cs-raj cs-raj commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Adds readGlobalFieldSchemas(dirPath, ignoredFiles?) to @contentstack/cli-utilities
  • Thin wrapper around the existing readContentTypeSchemas — identical behaviour, purpose-specific name
  • Exported from the package index so all downstream packages can import it directly

Why

Global fields now export as individual {uid}.json files (one per field) rather than a single bulk globalfields.json array. Import, content-types, and audit modules need to scan a directory and read all those files. Using readContentTypeSchemas directly would work but is semantically misleading — callers working with global fields should call a function that names its intent clearly.

Changes

File Change
packages/contentstack-utilities/src/content-type-utils.ts Added readGlobalFieldSchemas wrapper before readContentTypeSchemas

Notes

  • No behavioural change to readContentTypeSchemas — it is unchanged
  • The default ignore list (schema.json, .DS_Store, __master.json, __priority.json, field_rules_uid.json) is inherited from readContentTypeSchemas and applies equally to global field directories
  • This PR is a prerequisite for the cli-plugins changes that consume this function

Test plan

  • pnpm --filter @contentstack/cli-utilities build completes without errors
  • readGlobalFieldSchemas is present in the compiled lib/content-type-utils.d.ts
  • Importing readGlobalFieldSchemas from @contentstack/cli-utilities resolves correctly in downstream packages after rebuild

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@cs-raj @claude
feat(utilities): add readGlobalFieldSchemas utility function
6940f82 
Adds a thin wrapper around readContentTypeSchemas specifically for global
fields, enabling callers to read per-file {uid}.json exports from the
global_fields directory with a semantically accurate function name.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@cs-raj
cs-raj requested a review from a team as a code owner July 22, 2026 19:36
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 2 37 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 2 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

ℹ️ Vulnerabilities Without Available Fixes (Informational Only)

The following vulnerabilities were detected but do not have fixes available (no upgrade or patch). These are excluded from failure thresholds:

  • Critical without fixes: 0
  • High without fixes: 37
  • Medium without fixes: 2
  • Low without fixes: 0

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 2 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

ℹ️ Vulnerabilities Without Available Fixes (Informational Only)

The following vulnerabilities were detected but do not have fixes available (no upgrade or patch). These are excluded from failure thresholds:

  • Critical without fixes: 0
  • High without fixes: 0
  • Medium without fixes: 2
  • Low without fixes: 0

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

@cs-raj @claude
fix(utilities): add globalfields.json to readGlobalFieldSchemas ignor…
5f58ed7 
…e list

Prevents silent data corruption when a CLI v1 export archive containing
global_fields/globalfields.json is passed to readGlobalFieldSchemas — the
bulk array file is now skipped instead of being parsed as a single schema
element. readContentTypeSchemas is unaffected.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 2 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

ℹ️ Vulnerabilities Without Available Fixes (Informational Only)

The following vulnerabilities were detected but do not have fixes available (no upgrade or patch). These are excluded from failure thresholds:

  • Critical without fixes: 0
  • High without fixes: 0
  • Medium without fixes: 2
  • Low without fixes: 0

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

@cs-raj @claude
test(utilities): add readGlobalFieldSchemas unit tests and assert rea…
f42e59b 
…dContentTypeSchemas unchanged

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 2 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

ℹ️ Vulnerabilities Without Available Fixes (Informational Only)

The following vulnerabilities were detected but do not have fixes available (no upgrade or patch). These are excluded from failure thresholds:

  • Critical without fixes: 0
  • High without fixes: 0
  • Medium without fixes: 2
  • Low without fixes: 0

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

@cs-raj
cs-raj merged commit d19dd25 into v2-dev Jul 24, 2026
10 checks passed
@cs-raj
cs-raj deleted the enhc/DX-9464 branch July 24, 2026 05:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@harshitha-cstk harshitha-cstk harshitha-cstk approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@cs-raj @harshitha-cstk