Repository navigation
Parcel replay: pin the e52be04 FRLG maps - #85
Merged
Merged
Conversation
#83 regenerated every FRLG runtime map, but both Parcel bindings still pinned the five maps at 158b007. Python replay kept passing by reading them from Git history, while Arduino's native replay embeds current maps and rejects the stale hashes. Point map_revision and the five hashes at e52be04; all seven cases give identical results with either binding. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013VUubhHeYSMGSSDXZkKZss
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#83 regenerated all FRLG runtime maps, but the Parcel replay bindings (`binding.json`, `authored-binding.json`) still pinned five of them at 158b007. Python replay kept passing by reading those maps from Git history, while Arduino's native replay embeds the current maps and fails with "embedded map hash mismatch". This points `map_revision` at e52be04 and refreshes the five map hashes; nothing else changes. All 14 replay runs (7 cases × 2 bindings) give identical reports before and after, the full unittest suite passes on Python 3.8 and 3.12, and `json_schema --check-published` passes.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_013VUubhHeYSMGSSDXZkKZss