Skip to content

Remove test end file - #564

Open
danth wants to merge 1 commit into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
etas-contrib:no-test-end-file
Open

Remove test end file#564
danth wants to merge 1 commit into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
etas-contrib:no-test-end-file

Conversation

@danth

@danth danth commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Previously, the Python script would poll for the existence of a test end file, which was created by the control client test driver. The Python script would send SIGTERM to launch manager once the file appeared.

Now, the control client test driver just sends SIGTERM directly to launch manager.

This setup has been a source of flakiness in the past, so removing it may help. Also, it allows us to drop a patch on ITF as we are no longer affected by that bug.

Thanks to @MaciejKaszynski for exploring this the other day 😄

Previously, the Python script would poll for the existence of a
test end file, which was created by the control client test driver.
The Python script would send `SIGTERM` to launch manager once the
file appeared.

Now, the control client test driver just sends `SIGTERM` directly
to launch manager.

This setup has been a source of flakiness in the past, so removing
it may help. Also, it allows us to drop a patch on ITF as we are no
longer affected by that bug.
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run --lockfile_mode=error //:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.7.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: 0f153365-8328-4887-8844-53fd82cafbae
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Analyzing: target //:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (86 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (148 packages loaded, 3143 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (157 packages loaded, 9339 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (168 packages loaded, 9415 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (172 packages loaded, 11429 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //:license-check (173 packages loaded, 11555 targets configured).
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 17.258s, Critical Path: 0.39s
INFO: 16 processes: 4 disk cache hit, 12 internal.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 16 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/license.check.license_check ./formatted.txt <args omitted>
usage: org.eclipse.dash.licenses.cli.Main [-batch <int>] [-cd <url>]
       [-confidence <int>] [-ef <url>] [-excludeSources <sources>] [-help] [-lic
       <url>] [-project <shortname>] [-repo <url>] [-review] [-summary <file>]
       [-timeout <seconds>] [-token <token>]

@danth
danth deployed to workflow-approval August 28, 2026 15:59 — with GitHub Actions Active
@danth
danth deployed to workflow-approval August 28, 2026 15:59 — with GitHub Actions Active
target=target,
binary_path=str(remote_test_dir / "launch_manager"),
file_path=remote_test_dir.parent / "test_end",
process = target.execute_async(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should these be non async now?

args=["-c", str(remote_test_dir / "etc/complex_monitoring.bin")],
cwd=str(remote_test_dir),
args=["-c", config_path],
timeout_s=4.0,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it make sense to still keep a wrapper method?
This would break #525 since there is no central way to inject the program. Also might be good to keep a timeout

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Backlog

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants