More version bumps

[jayvdb]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated release versions for the storage and WebSocket service components.
  • These updates do not change the features or behavior available in the product. No user-facing functionality changes are included in this release.

[coderabbitai]

Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius.

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 326cec3f-adb6-41bf-80f6-de8fe26a16dc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c405e4d and 80eb1f2.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• Cargo.toml
• services/storage/Cargo.toml
• services/ws-server/Cargo.toml

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The storage service version changes from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1. The WebSocket server version changes from 0.2.1 to 0.2.2 in their package manifests and workspace declarations.

Changes

Package version updates

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update package version declarations services/storage/Cargo.toml, services/ws-server/Cargo.toml, Cargo.toml	The storage service version changes to 0.1.1, and the WebSocket server version changes to 0.2.2. The workspace declarations use these versions.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 80eb1

Both package version updates are consistent across their manifests, workspace declarations, and lockfile. No concrete build or runtime regression is evident from this change.

Architecture Summary

Architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to 80eb1

The change affects 3 systems.

Changed systems: Cargo.toml, services/storage, services/ws-server

Architecture concerns
No architecture-level concerns identified.

Review details

Systems and components

• observed — Cargo.toml (service) was modified; 1 changed file maps to changed impact.
• observed — services/storage (service) was modified; 1 changed file maps to changed impact.
• observed — services/ws-server (service) was modified; 1 changed file maps to changed impact.

Before / after behavior

• observed — Modified behavior in Cargo.toml: et-storage-service now uses version 0.1.1 instead of 0.1.0.
• observed — Modified behavior in Cargo.toml: No dependency declarations changed on these lines.
• observed — Modified behavior in Cargo.toml: et-ws-server now uses version 0.2.2 instead of 0.2.1.
• observed — Modified behavior in services/storage/Cargo.toml: The package version changes from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately identifies the main change: version bumps for the et-storage-service and et-ws-server packages. It is concise and related to the changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Autopilot is currently an internal CodeRabbit preview.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[deepsource-io]

DeepSource Code Review

We reviewed changes in c405e4d...80eb1f2 on this pull request. Below is the summary for the review, and you can see the individual issues we found as inline review comments.

See full review on DeepSource ↗

PR Report Card

Overall Grade

Security   Reliability   Complexity   Hygiene   Coverage

Code Review Summary

Analyzer	Status	Updated (UTC)	Details
C#		Oct 1, 2026 5:55a.m.	Review ↗
C & C++		Oct 1, 2026 5:55a.m.	Review ↗
Docker		Oct 1, 2026 5:55a.m.	Review ↗
Java		Oct 1, 2026 5:55a.m.	Review ↗
JavaScript		Oct 1, 2026 5:55a.m.	Review ↗
Python		Oct 1, 2026 5:55a.m.	Review ↗
Rust		Oct 1, 2026 5:55a.m.	Review ↗
Secrets		Oct 1, 2026 5:55a.m.	Review ↗
Code coverage		Oct 1, 2026 6:42a.m.	Review ↗

Code Coverage Summary

Language	Line Coverage (Overall)
Aggregate	71.5%
Python	89.6%
Rust	69.9%

➟ Additional coverage metrics may have been reported. See full coverage report ↗

---

Important

AI Review is run only on demand for your team. We're only showing results of static analysis review right now. To trigger AI Review, comment @deepsourcebot review on this thread.

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!