Repository navigation
chore(publish): add the private issue number to the transcript-cleanup comment in 15 scripts, so they match their source - #100
Merged
Conversation
…p comment in 15 scripts, so they match their source The Oct 31 zpublish_zscripts run copied this from evo.scripts and left it uncommitted, as the publisher always does. The nightly test run skips a dirty tree, so evo.zscripts went unmeasured on 2026-11-01. PR #98 published this comment without the number, while the private source has carried it since its own fix, so every publish staged it again. Other files here already cite evo.scripts numbers, so this follows the same practice. Comment only; CHECKSUMS.txt refreshed by the publisher.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What and why
The nightly test run on 2026-11-01 skipped evo.zscripts: "working tree dirty (16 paths)". A
zpublish_zscriptsrun on Oct 31 at 23:00 had copied a change from evo.scripts and left it uncommitted, as the publisher always does.The change is one comment, identical in 15 scripts:
219 is the evo.scripts issue for the transcript leak that #98 fixed here. #98 published the comment without the number, but the private source has always had it, so every publish would stage it again. Other files in this repo already cite evo.scripts numbers in their comments (101, 119, 130), so this follows the same practice.
CHECKSUMS.txtis refreshed by the publisher for the 15 files.No behavior change. There's no CHANGELOG entry because only a comment changed, and no version bump: it ships with the next release.
How it was tested
On this branch:
zchecksums: 45 files matchCHECKSUMS.txt.The 15 scripts are byte-identical, blob for blob, to what the publisher staged in the main checkout.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code