Skip to content

docs: 6ep rung — residual attribution overturned (subset 2.0062) #104

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
ronaldtse merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

docs: 6ep rung — residual attribution overturned (subset 2.0062) #104

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions docs/RESULTS.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -423,3 +423,15 @@ The law sharpens: the pretrained WIDTH is load-bearing - projection
destroys the representation at any compression; depth is the
compressible axis. First verdict carrying the label-provenance hash
(labels sha256 e70ce991..., 137.2MB recorded in final_eval.json).

## ara-diac-small-2-6ep — doubling epochs collapses the residual (2026-08-31, subset)

Same as the 2.0 rung (r7 labels, Muon, vanilla ByT5-small) at 6 epochs
instead of 3 (21,990 steps, final CE 0.0013). 300-subset verdict:
teacher in-run 1.2887, student **2.0062** — gate_delta 0.72, within
striking distance of the strict teacher+0.5 gate, vs 3.66 (1.0) and
3.81 (layerdrop) on the same subset. **This overturns the E2/E3
residual attribution**: the 2.25pp residual was mostly optimization
(undertraining), not domain coverage. Full-set gate running - given
three prior subset-overstatement instances, the honest number waits
there. Provenance: labels sha256 e70ce991 (137.2MB) recorded.
Loading