Skip to content

docs: G2a full-set 4.5701 — attribution stands #106

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
ronaldtse merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

docs: G2a full-set 4.5701 — attribution stands #106

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
13 changes: 13 additions & 0 deletions docs/RESULTS.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -435,3 +435,16 @@ residual attribution**: the 2.25pp residual was mostly optimization
(undertraining), not domain coverage. Full-set gate running - given
three prior subset-overstatement instances, the honest number waits
there. Provenance: labels sha256 e70ce991 (137.2MB) recorded.

## ara-diac-small-2-6ep — full-set verdict: 4.5701; the discipline vindicated (2026-08-31)

Full 1,200-paragraph gate (teacher in-run 2.289): student **4.5701**,
gate_delta 2.28. Doubling epochs bought 0.25pp over the 3-epoch 2.0
rung (4.8218 -> 4.5701) - the residual is NOT mostly undertraining;
the E2/E3 domain attribution substantially stands (~0.25pp epochs,
~2.0pp domain/other). The subset had said 2.0062 / delta 0.72 - a
near-overturn of the decomposition that the full set corrects: the
FOURTH subset-overstatement instance and the most dramatic (subset
delta 0.72 -> full delta 2.28, a 3.2x inflation). The full-set-only
publication rule earns its keep here: this entry is the paper's
strongest measurement-discipline exhibit.
Loading