prose(experiment): the phase joins discovery, research, discussion, and the epic flow - #1062
Closed
leeovery wants to merge 7 commits into
Closed
prose(experiment): the phase joins discovery, research, discussion, and the epic flow#1062leeovery wants to merge 7 commits into
leeovery wants to merge 7 commits into
Conversation
…ow, exit gate, first-phase gate, epic menu command The research conclude gate carries e/experiment always — conclude, then route into the same-topic experiments. The discussion's empirical wall gets its consent gate (experiment-exit-gate), the single-phase first- phase choice becomes an engine menu (first-phase-gate, three-way), and the epic menu gains x/experiment beside d/discuss and r/research (new_experiment rides the soft-gate action list). Simulation covers the research-conclude spawn, the exit's create+await commit ordering, and the menu-born experiment topic. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…r measure Routing inference, first-phase routing, topic synthesis, map operations, the session-loop and harvest enums, brief propagation, and the detection core all speak the three-way vocabulary; the first-phase choice (and the quick-fix promotion's twin in scoping) render through the new engine gates, adopting complexity-check's prose menus on the way. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…o the same-topic experiments Topic-completion judges the hypothesis question and the new gate row carries it: research concludes normally (completed, indexed, committed) then routes straight into /workflow-experiment-entry with context hot — no bridge, no context clear. Guidelines name the exploratory-sighting boundary; the research and discussion entry tables gain the Experiment slot. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… into the design, evidence at re-entry The session gains J. The Empirical Wall (engine-gated, the user's call): the waiting point is documented and committed, then the session exits straight into /workflow-experiment-entry with the point riding the handoff's Spawned from line; the walk's first conceive records the evidence wait, create and await landing in one commit. G checks the live wait before the ceremony and states plainly what still waits; the conclude flow surfaces the engine's refusal verbatim. The reconcile advisory gains the experiment branch — register rendered, concluded reports read in full, abandonments surfaced with their reasons. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…way triage landing, roadmap pull enum The epic menu's cancel flow names the wait-release path beside the spec collapse and reads released_wait on the receipt; the feature and cross-cutting continuations carry the (Experiment) slot; triage-landing judges a measurable question experiment-side and reactivates across all three phases; the roadmap pull-forward enum widens. topic requeue stays the research↔discussion pair — no flow here produces a requeue into or out of experiment. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Owner
Author
|
Closed: this stack implements a superseded model of the experiment phase. The corrected design is PR #1057 ( |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR4 of the experiment-phase stack (design: #1057, stacks on #1061).
first-phase-gate.e/experiment— the needs-measuring arm. Research concludes normally (completed, indexed, committed), then routes straight into/workflow-experiment-entrywith context hot.experiment-exit-gateasks; on yes the point is documented as waiting, the discussion commits, and the session exits into the experiment design. The walk's first conceive records the engine-side wait (create→await→ one commit; the unrecorded window is one tool call, and the pre-await crash state is benign). Re-entry surfaces evidence viareconcile-advisory.md's newexperimentbranch (register + reports read in full, abandonments with reasons); the conclude flow checks the wait first and the engine refusal backstops.x/experiment(new_experiment) joins the command rows; cancel flow names the wait-release confirm and readsreleased_wait.triage-landingthree-way landing judgment, entry-skill pipeline tables, roadmap pull enum.complexity-check's promotion menu migrated to the engine (complexity-gate) under the touch-adopts-menus rule.Gates:
npm test2676/2676 ·npm run test:cli5/5 ·npm run typecheckclean · simulation extended (conclude-spawn, exit ordering, epic x-row); no snapshot goldens moved.🤖 Generated with Claude Code