Skip to content

CLAUDE.md: record that Cargo.lock is gitignored on purpose #15

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
rowan-claude merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2026
Merged

CLAUDE.md: record that Cargo.lock is gitignored on purpose #15

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions CLAUDE.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -40,6 +40,17 @@ mint a new one — it is the wrong machine account. Either Glenn publishes from
account, or he moves the token into the mas keychain with the prompting form
(`security add-generic-password -U -a rowan -s crates-io-token -w`, no value after -w).
Verified 2026-07-26: crates.io has netcode-official 1.0.0 while this repo is at 1.1.0.

CARGO.LOCK IS GITIGNORED HERE ON PURPOSE
`.gitignore` lists `Cargo.lock` and `fuzz/Cargo.lock` deliberately, hand-written beside
the fuzz artifacts. This is a library crate: dependents do not use its lock, and this is
the only one of the three Rust ports with real dependencies (57 packages via
chacha20poly1305). serialize.rs and reliable.rs DO commit a lock, but by omission rather
than decision -- neither .gitignore mentions it, and both locks are near-empty (1 and 2
packages) because those crates have essentially no dependencies. Do not "fix" the
inconsistency by adding a lock here; the considered choice is this one.
Note the lock IS packaged into the published .crate, so if this is ever revisited it is
a version site, not just a dev-convenience question.
<!-- HOT:END -->

## Build and test
Expand Down
Loading