Skip to content

docs(block): correct deposit DA-size tracking comment #342

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wayzeek wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+3 −2
Open

docs(block): correct deposit DA-size tracking comment #342

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions crates/mega-evm/src/block/limit.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -107,8 +107,9 @@
//! block-level Data Availability size limit checks during pre-execution validation
//! - **Rationale**: Deposit transactions are trustless L1→L2 messages that cannot be censored. They
//! must be included in blocks regardless of their DA size to maintain bridge integrity
//! - **Tracking**: While exempt from limit checks, deposit DA sizes are still tracked and
//! accumulated in block DA usage counters for monitoring purposes
//! - **Tracking**: Deposit DA sizes are not accumulated into the block DA usage counter
//! (`block_da_size_used`). The spec permits tracking them for monitoring (RFC-2119 MAY), but the
//! executor opts out, so the counter reflects only non-deposit transactions.
//! - **Other Limits**: Deposit transactions are still subject to all other limits (gas, tx size,
//! compute gas, data size, KV updates)
//!
Expand Down