[mjacobs]

Summary

agy 1.5.5 swarm sessions could retain truncated transcripts because their saved tool results did not pass completeness verification. This change qualifies the observed swarm and workspace results, restores complete exports for the four exercised release conversations, and places child transcripts beneath the creation step identified by their returned conversation ID.

Design

• Preserve captured swarm result text, arguments, output references, and rendering metadata. Unsupported actions, argument combinations, errors, and additional fields continue to fail closed.
• Accept observed share/branch workspace invocations, ordered two-child list/kill results, empty task lists, and skill reads with the captured timestamp prefix. Derive metadata from saved content; existing attestations require reverification.
• Reserve explicit child IDs before chronological fallback. Keep unmatched children visible, and disable fallback for parents containing swarm calls.
• Record the verified 1.5.5 protobuf snapshot and compatibility report. These mappings require no embedded descriptor changes or new exceptions to source verification.

Current state

• The recorded qualification passes native full/displayed comparison, offline JSON equality, isolated sync, and attestation validation for all four release scenarios. The corpus sweep fetched/rendered 499/499 conversations and verified 489/499; ten previously recorded historical source/RPC mismatches remain unqualified.
• Local validation: formatting, Go tests, race tests, vet, lint, and build pass. Python maintenance tests pass: 174 run, 100 skipped. Existing automatic reviews completed with no findings; the snapshot/audit review could not independently inspect private captures.
• No production reader installation or restart is included. Live downstream re-ingestion was not exercised. See the compatibility report for provenance and exercise limits.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-10T19:25:12.494925Z	213a04b	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.