Skip to content

Using flagger for de novo primary assemblies of diploid species #51

Description

@DustinSokolowski

Hello!

We are working on a number of rodent assemblies from animals where we do not have trio or Hi-C-seq information. We have Hifi + (usually) ONT UL reads for these species, and while we can get some phasing info from the Hifi reads alone, the primary assemblies typically look more complete than the Hap1/Hap2 assemblies with Hifiasm or Verkko. We tried Flagger without providing phasing information (fastq --> bam (with minimap2) --> flagger quick start) and it did a pretty good job catching obvious errors and collapses (see example of collapse below).

Image

With this in mind, can you please let me know what we are losing when running flagger if we do not have phasing information, or can you see it leading to major false positives?

Quick edit: I saw a comment where you said "That is actually the assumption of HMM-Flagger that the input (bam file) contains phased read mappings”. Does this refer to a haplotagged bam file?

Best,
Dustin

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions