100,000 items for benchmark too small?

[simonhf]

With only 100k items in the benchmark, all the items could be held in the 8 MB cache, which would result in misleading performance, or? Can you kindly post a similar benchmark but with say, 10M or 100M items? Thanks!

[mtak-]

It's possible the whole tree would all fit in L3 cache. I'm in favor of more benchmarks 👍