Skip to content

sync - #1811

Merged
jokob-sk merged 5 commits into
next_releasefrom
main
Sep 25, 2026
Merged

sync#1811
jokob-sk merged 5 commits into
next_releasefrom
main

Conversation

@jokob-sk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

mauricio-camayo and others added 5 commits September 23, 2026 15:56
Periodic iw-scan-based detection of the 6 heuristics that don't need
monitor-mode hardware (see issue #1789): pwnagotchi/Pineapple signatures,
evil-twin/open clones, baseline-AP-absent-with-clone, security downgrades,
and duplicate-SSID/different-vendor - all evaluated against a user-curated
trusted-AP baseline (WIFICANARY_trusted_aps). A detection creates a
flagged Devices entry even for BSSIDs that never associate, per the
addendum on the same issue.

- WIFICANARY_TRUSTED_SECURITY is multi-select: an observed encryption
  exactly matching any selected value is accepted; otherwise it's flagged
  if weaker than the strongest selected value (deliberate - comparing
  against the weakest would make multi-select pointless, since anything
  at/above the weakest would silently pass regardless of the rest of the
  selection).
- Added a "known device turned rogue" motor: escalate_known_devices()
  cross-references each detection's BSSID against the Devices table via
  the new DeviceInstance.getAllByMacs(). This covers the BSSID-identity
  half of the issue #1789 addendum's motor 10; the deauth/probe-source-MAC
  half still needs monitor-mode data this plugin doesn't have.
- Vendor is deliberately not looked up by this plugin - any device it
  creates gets devVendor filled in for free by core's own vendor_update
  plugin on its next pass.

43 wificanary unit tests + 10 DeviceInstance.getAllByMacs() tests, all
test_plugin_conventions.py checks pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011meLPKCzVpdZyAUfv5U6mm
…tion

- check_trusted_aps() was evaluating every AP sharing a protected SSID
  against every trusted entry for that SSID, not just its own. A main AP
  requiring a stricter accepted security set (e.g. wpa3-only) than a
  separately-trusted extender (e.g. wpa2) caused the extender to be
  flagged as evil_twin/absent_baseline_clone - it was being judged
  against the main AP's accepted set instead of its own. Fixed by
  excluding, from each trusted entry's evaluation, any BSSID that has its
  own separate trusted entry for the same SSID.
- README's "iw isn't in the published image yet" section was already
  stale within the same PR - this branch's own Dockerfile change adds
  iw + setcap, so the image ships it. Replaced with one sentence.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… Dockerfiles

check_trusted_aps() evaluated a rogue AP once per trusted_aps entry sharing
its SSID, so the documented main-AP+extender pattern (same SSID, two
entries) produced duplicate (bssid, motor) rows for a real clone - a
problem once next_release's per-plugin identity-hash dedup guard lands in
main, since it drops a plugin's entire batch on any internal duplicate.
Fixed by deduping once in main() after collecting from all check_*
functions. Also added iw + its setcap to Dockerfile.debian and
.devcontainer/Dockerfile, which the original PR missed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011meLPKCzVpdZyAUfv5U6mm
Add WIFICANARY plugin - passive WiFi rogue-AP detection
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: netalertx/NetAlertX/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 89c3f8cd-6f80-4fe4-a10f-941f16d49f86

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@jokob-sk
jokob-sk merged commit 23d2ed3 into next_release Sep 25, 2026
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants