Skip to content

docs(readme): fix stale/dangling release links + surface v0.2.1 offline delivery - #228

Merged
nghqqa merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
readme-refresh
Sep 13, 2026
Merged

nghqqa merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
readme-refresh

Conversation

@nghqqa

@nghqqa nghqqa commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

为什么要改

README 审查发现 2 处硬伤:主项目段引导用户从 v0.1.0-preview.4 Release 下载——该 Release 昨日已转 draft,访客访问 404;'9 镜像隔离栈'错误指向 runtime-images-20260912(实际装的是 AgentTeams Manager + CoPaw worker 运行时镜像)。另有 v0.2.1 离线交付与外部机 10/10 验证这两项最新最强证据未写入。

改动清单

  • P0 修复:下载引导统一指向 v0.2.1;runtime-images 仅按真实内容(运行时镜像)引用
  • 新增证据:完整隔离栈一键启动四步流程 + 外部 Windows 机器两轮验证与一次复验 10/10 零干预
  • 过时表述:'不支持直接 docker compose up' 更新为双路径事实(开发态编排器 / 离线态 start-stack)
  • 结构:快速开始前提(采用者视角);演示区补控制台截图(仓库现成资产);红黄边界徽章加一行点破语;提交材料段去掉内部 changelog 语气
  • 口径与冻结的《离线镜像外部验证报告-20260913》一致(8 类被门禁拦截的故障、10/10、两轮+复验)
  • 其余章节(三路径/Agent 协同/Trace/RAG/PolarDB/评估方法/技术栈)逐字节保留

…e delivery

- P0: the 'Python control plane' section pointed users to the
  v0.1.0-preview.4 release for downloads — that release is now a draft,
  so the link 404s for visitors. The 9-image isolated-stack links also
  pointed at runtime-images-20260912, which actually ships the
  AgentTeams Manager + CoPaw worker runtime images, not the isolated
  stack. Both now point to v0.2.1; runtime-images is linked only for
  what it really contains.
- Surface the v0.2.1 offline delivery (db-init bundle + start-stack
  launcher) and the external-machine two-round verification (10/10,
  zero-intervention) as first-class proof.
- docker compose statement updated: dev path stays orchestrated via
  one_click_startup.py; the offline delivery path drives docker compose
  through the shipped start-stack scripts (schema init included).
- Structure: move 快速开始 above the feature sections; add the demo
  console screenshot to 演示; add a one-line caption reframing the
  red/yellow boundary badges; trim the internal-changelog tone from
  提交材料.
@nghqqa
nghqqa merged commit e5c5ae4 into main Sep 13, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant