Skip to content

[release-5.0] OCPBUGS-115064: Install NOO using OLMv0 instead of OLMv1 - #3143

Open
openshift-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:release-5.0from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-3115-to-release-5.0
Open

[release-5.0] OCPBUGS-115064: Install NOO using OLMv0 instead of OLMv1#3143
openshift-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:release-5.0from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-3115-to-release-5.0

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is an automated cherry-pick of #3115

/assign stleerh

- Install NOO using OLMv0 instead of OLMv1, since there's a lack of Console integration with OLMv1.
- Remove the code to create the namespace for FlowCollector, since it's created automatically
- Fix CSV name for OLMv0
- Add two new test cases for OLMv0
- Add a NOO installation tiemout so if it fails, it won't retry forever.
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Ignoring requests to cherry-pick non-bug issues: CORENET-6714

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #3115

/assign stleerh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 1db17c8c-4f06-4598-8817-35cb0790c503

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from jcaamano and tssurya August 26, 2026 22:48
@stleerh
stleerh requested review from OlivierCazade and jotak August 27, 2026 20:03
@jotak

jotak commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 31, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-ipsec

Scheduling tests matching the pipeline_run_if_changed or not excluded by pipeline_skip_if_only_changed parameters:
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fdp-qe
/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-aws-ovn-windows
/test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6-ipsec
/test e2e-ovn-ipsec-step-registry
/test hypershift-e2e-aks

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak, openshift-cherrypick-robot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign abhat for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@stleerh

stleerh commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

@stleerh stleerh changed the title [release-5.0] CORENET-6714: Install NOO using OLMv0 instead of OLMv1 [release-5.0] OCPBUGS-115064: Install NOO using OLMv0 instead of OLMv1 Aug 31, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 31, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-115064, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-115064 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 5.1.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #3115

/assign stleerh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@stleerh

stleerh commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 31, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@stleerh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-115064, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-115064 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 5.1.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@stleerh

stleerh commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 31, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@stleerh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-115064, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-115065 is in the state MODIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-115065 targets the "5.1.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 5.1.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (core-networking-bot@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@stleerh

stleerh commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Aug 31, 2026
@stleerh

stleerh commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

@stleerh

stleerh commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

@stleerh

stleerh commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw 2041a24 link true /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw
ci/prow/5.0-upgrade-from-stable-4.22-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade 2041a24 link false /test 5.0-upgrade-from-stable-4.22-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@stleerh

stleerh commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@danwinship Looks like I need an override for at least e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw. I'm getting the same errors that are unrelated to these changes on these tests. Also need an approval. Already got lgtm.

@stleerh

stleerh commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@danwinship @tssurya Is there anything I need to do to get this merged? I checked both failures, and they're unrelated to this change and have failed multiple times for the same reasons? It needs an /approve and an override. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants