[release-5.0] OCPBUGS-127501: Backport openshift-ci env and artifact improvements - #303
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Anvesh Jaggapatruni <ajaggapa@redhat.com>
Use ARTIFACT_DIR for reporter output, pass junit-report and ginkgo export paths for ibgp and ebgp runs into separate subdirectories, and skip kind log export when e2etest runs against an external kubeconfig. Signed-off-by: Anvesh Jaggapatruni <ajaggapa@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Comment |
|
/retest |
|
/test metallb-e2e-metal |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ajaggapa, fedepaol The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
|
@ajaggapa: The label(s) DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/verified by ci |
|
@ajaggapa: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
|
@ajaggapa: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-127501, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@ajaggapa: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-127501, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@ajaggapa: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-127501, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@ajaggapa: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-127501, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@ajaggapa: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-127501, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@ajaggapa: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
6995e46
into
openshift:release-5.0
|
@ajaggapa: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-127501: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: All linked pull requests have the DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Is this a BUG FIX or a FEATURE ?:
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Backports the following OpenShift CI improvements from
maintorelease-5.0.Jira: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-127501
#299 — Openshift CI: env setup for dualstack tests
Adds an
nthhosthelper inopenshift-ci/common.shthat returns the Nth host in a CIDR via Python'sipaddress.ip_network. ForIP_STACK=v4v6, derivesPROVISIONING_HOST_EXTERNAL_IPV6fromEXTERNAL_SUBNET_V6(host index 1) instead of a hardcoded dummy address.#300 — openshift ci: improve junit file and artifact collection for e2etests
Sets
REPORTER_PATHfromARTIFACT_DIRso artifacts land in the standard OpenShift CI location. Passes--junit-reportand--exportdirectly to ginkgo for iBGP and eBGP test runs, writing results to separateibgp/andebgp/subdirectories. Both runs execute even if one fails, and the script exits non-zero if either run failed. Skips kind log export when running against an external kubeconfig.Special notes for your reviewer:
Both commits cherry-picked cleanly from
mainwith no conflicts. These are CI/tooling-only changes — no functional MetalLB behavior is modified.Release note: