refactor: use renderable guards for input adornments

[QDyanbing]

说明

• 使用 isReactRenderable 统一判断 prefix、suffix、addon 和 clear icon 是否需要渲染
• 支持数字 0 等有效 React 内容，并保持相关布局 class 与节点判断一致
• 将 @rc-component/util 的最低版本提升到首次提供该 helper 的 ^1.13.0

验证

• npm run tsc
• npm run lint
• npm test -- tests/BaseInput.test.tsx tests/index.test.tsx --runInBand

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug 修复
  • 优化输入框前缀、后缀及前后置内容的渲染判断，确保可渲染的 React 节点能够正确显示。
  • 改进清除图标的显示判断，提升相关配置下的渲染准确性。

[vercel]

@QDyanbing is attempting to deploy a commit to the afc163's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: d13b8016-d6d0-4792-8ee0-2e05b4844be2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 52086bb and 59517fe.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• package.json
• src/BaseInput.tsx
• src/utils/commonUtils.ts

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

Walkthrough

本次变更将节点渲染判断统一为 isReactRenderable，覆盖 BaseInput、hasAddon 和 hasPrefixSuffix。同时将 @rc-component/util 更新至 ^1.13.0。

Changes

可渲染节点判断

Layer / File(s)	Summary
工具函数可渲染判断 src/utils/commonUtils.ts, package.json	hasAddon 和 hasPrefixSuffix 使用 isReactRenderable 判断节点，并显式转换 allowClear。运行时依赖更新至 @rc-component/util ^1.13.0。
BaseInput 渲染条件 src/BaseInput.tsx	清除图标、前缀、后缀、addonBefore 和 addonAfter 的渲染及相关类名条件使用 isReactRenderable。

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 59517

Adornment values such as numeric 0 will render consistently while existing layout behavior stays aligned with rendered nodes. No actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review.

Suggested reviewers: afc163

Poem

小兔拿起渲染锤，
节点真假分得明。
前缀后缀齐检查，
清除图标不漏行。
工具版本同步升，
代码轻快过春风。

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 2 functions across 2 files. (1 skipped: 1 …	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	标题准确概括了主要变更：使用可渲染性判断来处理输入组件的前缀、后缀、附加内容和清除图标。标题简洁且具体。
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 2 functions across 2 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

• Fix all pre-merge checks with AI

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.36%. Comparing base (52086bb) to head (59517fe).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #203      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.34%   98.36%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines         423      428       +5     
  Branches      137      134       -3     
==========================================
+ Hits          416      421       +5     
  Misses          7        7              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[yoyo837]

Reviewed the renderability semantics, helper selection, dependency floor, existing feedback, and completed CI results. The implementation looks correct. The Vercel failure is limited to team deployment authorization and is not a code or build failure.