Repository navigation
chore(master): release 0.2.3 - #70
scrollDynasty wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Review: release-please version bump — soundThis is a mechanical Release Please PR (0.2.2 → 0.2.3) with no runtime code change, so the correctness / security / isolation-contract axes have no surface here. What I did check: Version consistency (the four places the
I byte-checked Bump level: No stale One non-blocking note before merge, not a defect in this diff: merging this PR cuts the |
539290b to
719c98e
Compare
Review: release-please version bump 0.2.2 → 0.2.3No findings. This is a pure automated release PR — no source, test, or workflow code changes — so none of the correctness, resource-lifecycle, or session/page-isolation surfaces are touched. Nothing in the diff logs, returns, or persists page content, tokens, saved browser state, or filesystem paths. What I verified against the release contract: Bump level is correct. All four version carriers agree, plus the manifest and lockfile:
That satisfies every assertion in Playwright pin is undisturbed. The branch is current with master. Diffing the merge result against Formatting is safe. One pre-existing operational note for whoever merges this, not a defect in the diff: |
|
Reviewed as a release-please version bump. No source behaviour changes, so the correctness / security / isolation axes have no surface here — the only thing worth checking is whether the six version artifacts stay mutually consistent, and they do. Verified against the invariants the repo actually enforces (
Two things I checked and am deliberately not raising as findings:
No findings. Sound to merge; the tag push is what exercises the publish path. |
701adc2 to
0b4cdab
Compare
|
Review: mechanical release PR — no findings This is a release-please bump with no runtime code in the diff, so the correctness / security / isolation axes have nothing to attach to: no browser contexts, pages, listeners, timers, logging, or MCP result paths are touched, and the session/page addressing and per-session serialization contracts are untouched. I verified the one thing a release PR can actually get wrong — version consistency across every file that carries it:
All five agree, which is exactly what The No new behaviour is introduced, so no new tests are warranted — the existing release-contract test already covers this diff's entire surface. One pre-merge caveat (repo state, not the diff). Looks good to me on the code-review axes. 🤖 Generated with Claude Code |
🤖 I have created a release beep boop
0.2.3 (2026-10-08)
Features
This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.