Skip to content

Fix USDT0 naming and FAQ formatting#32

Closed
probablyangg wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/fix-usdt0-docs-formatting
Closed

Fix USDT0 naming and FAQ formatting#32
probablyangg wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/fix-usdt0-docs-formatting

Conversation

@probablyangg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changed

  • reformatted the embedded FAQ on the USDT0 gas page with question-level headings
  • renamed the page and related English cross-links from “USDT as gas” to “USDT0 as gas”
  • corrected English sidebar casing and labels for USDT0-related pages
  • documented USDT versus USDT0 usage, acronym casing, FAQ structure, and sidebar-label conventions in the style guide

Why

The FAQ questions were plain bold paragraphs, which gave the section weak visual hierarchy and no question-level anchors. Several navigation labels had also been mechanically title-cased into forms such as Usdt0, which does not preserve the USDT0 brand name.

This addresses BIZ-49 and the related docs feedback in Slack.

Impact

Readers get a clearer FAQ and consistent USDT0 naming across the affected page, navigation, and cross-links. The style guide now records the conventions that prevent the same drift in future edits.

Validation

  • npm run check
    • style check: 0 blocking findings
    • i18n parity: 0 missing pages
    • TypeScript: passed
    • structured data: passed
    • production docs build: passed

The existing advisory style warnings remain unchanged. Changed English pages are expected to show stale translation notices until the PR translation workflow refreshes the generated Chinese and Korean files.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Styleguide check

✓ 132 en pages — 0 blocking, 11 warnings

docs/pages/en/explanation/autobahn.mdx

  • ⚠ warning: marketing word "robust" (L20)
  • ⚠ warning: marketing word "seamless" (L34)

docs/pages/en/explanation/consensus.mdx

  • ⚠ warning: marketing word "robust" (L32)

docs/pages/en/explanation/ethereum-compatibility.mdx

  • ⚠ warning: marketing word "seamless" (L10)

docs/pages/en/how-to/monitor-node.mdx

  • ⚠ warning: marketing word "comprehensive" (L7)

docs/pages/en/how-to/troubleshoot-node.mdx

  • ⚠ warning: marketing word "comprehensive" (L7)

docs/pages/en/reference/indexers.mdx

  • ⚠ warning: marketing word "seamlessly" (L9)

docs/pages/en/reference/ramps.mdx

  • ⚠ warning: marketing word "seamless" (L28)

docs/pages/en/reference/system-transactions-api.mdx

  • ⚠ warning: marketing word "comprehensive" (L358)

docs/pages/en/reference/wallets.mdx

  • ⚠ warning: marketing word "powerful" (L83)
  • ⚠ warning: marketing word "seamless" (L30)

Enforced by npm run style:check — see STYLEGUIDE.md.

@probablyangg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

closes BIZ-49

@probablyangg
probablyangg marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2026 20:24
@probablyangg
probablyangg deleted the codex/fix-usdt0-docs-formatting branch July 24, 2026 20:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant