Repository navigation
fix: compare shared workflow pins by content - #37
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Caller pins are current when reusable workflow files and shared script sources have the same Git blob identities and file modes as master. The settings report lists changed shared files and reports unknown or unreachable pins as errors while preserving its non-blocking observation contract.
Validation:
Scripts/checkpassed all 65 tests, generated-workflow checks, actionlint and whitespace checks. Regression coverage includes documentation-only changes, changed workflows/scripts, missing files, unknown/unreachable pins and truncated tree responses. A live scan reports no drift across 17 repositories and 56 callers.