Skip to content

chore: pin tinytools at the filesystem-tools tip - #245

Closed
senamakel wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
oh-extract-filesystem-tools
Closed

senamakel wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
oh-extract-filesystem-tools

Conversation

@senamakel

@senamakel senamakel commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Bumps the vendor/tinytools gitlink to the commit that adds tinytools-std's filesystem module and its FsGate seam (tinyhumansai/tinytools#38). Nothing else changes: tinyagents does not depend on tinytools-std, so no manifests or lockfiles move.

OpenHuman consumes the new module through this pin (wave 3 of the vendor extraction). The pinned tinytools commit sits on the pre-0.5.0 line that tinyagents still builds against; it is an ancestor of the tinytools PR head, so it stays reachable once that PR lands.

Related issue

None.

Validation

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated a bundled component. No user-facing changes are noted.

Updated the pinned commit for the tinytools subproject to incorporate upstream fixes or improvements.

Auto-committed-on: dragonfly
Co-authored-by: Medulla <medulla@tinyhumans.ai>
@tinysweeper

tinysweeper Bot commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tiny Sweeper review

Tiny Sweeper reviewed this change across 6 lane(s) and found 0 active actionable finding(s). Detailed lane evidence and any incomplete work are listed below.

State: Ready for maintainer review
Priority: none
Reviewed head: 152546e826f3
Updated: 1790764673 (Unix time)

Review snapshot

Change surface Files Review signal Count
Production 0 Active findings 0
Tests 0 Noted findings 0
Documentation 0 Resolved findings 0
Configuration 0 Pending checks/questions 0

Completeness: Complete
Test assessment: No supported feature-to-test mapping was available; this does not mean tests are absent or passed.

What changed

The review could not produce a supported behavioral summary; inspect the cited changed surface and lane details below.

Features

None identified with supported citations.

Tests

No supported feature-to-test mapping was produced. Test execution is not inferred.

Findings

No active actionable findings.

Before merge

None.

Agent review details

critique

  • Conclusion: Neutral
  • Scope reviewed: all assigned evidence
  • Lane summary: No added or modified lines to review.

security

  • Conclusion: Neutral
  • Scope reviewed: all assigned evidence
  • Lane summary: No added or modified lines to review.

tests

  • Conclusion: Neutral
  • Scope reviewed: all assigned evidence
  • Lane summary: No added or modified lines to review.

commits

  • Conclusion: Neutral
  • Scope reviewed: all assigned evidence
  • Lane summary: Nothing sensitive found in what this pull request commits.

description

  • Conclusion: Neutral
  • Scope reviewed: all assigned evidence
  • Lane summary: No added or modified lines to review.

e2e

  • Conclusion: Neutral
  • Scope reviewed: all assigned evidence
  • Lane summary: No added or modified lines to review.
Evidence and run details
  • Models: ladder/vectors
  • Spend: $0.000000
  • Tokens: 0 input · 0 output · 0 cached · 18 embedding
Head State Pass summary
152546e826f3 ready for maintainer review 0 active finding(s), 0 resolved finding(s) (at 1790764673)

tinysweeper 0.1.0

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-30T10:40:37.601211Z 152546e PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius.

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: cf8141c3-6138-4788-a3b2-ea24d1d8808d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 70a7108 and 152546e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • vendor/tinytools

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 0 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The vendor/tinytools subproject reference changed from commit e03cef21f62041952841964b2cc9ca2e84723cf4 to 60e91941beab1f999e64561a74c26f41f1a1ea41.

Changes

tinytools reference update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update subproject reference
vendor/tinytools
The recorded subproject commit reference changed to 60e91941beab1f999e64561a74c26f41f1a1ea41.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Change: Other

Suggested reviewers: m3ga-mind, stevent95-star

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 15254

No merge-blocking defect is established for this pin update. Normal submodule checkout and build checks should pass before merging; compatibility with OpenHuman has not been independently confirmed.

Architecture Summary

Architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to 15254

The changed surface does not map to a changed system, dependency edge, entrypoint, or external dependency.

Changed systems: None identified.

Architecture concerns
No architecture-level concerns identified.

Review details

Before / after behavior

  • observed — Modified behavior in vendor/tinytools: The vendor/tinytools subproject commit reference was updated from e03cef21f62041952841964b2cc9ca2e84723cf4 to 60e91941beab1f999e64561a74c26f41f1a1ea41.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: updating the tinytools pin to the filesystem-tools tip.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

I’m a rabbit with a tinytools pin,
A new commit is tucked within.
I nibble clover, check the hash,
Then hop away in one quick dash.
The reference rests, neat as can be.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@tinysweeper tinysweeper Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tinysweeper found nothing blocking. Approving.

$0.0000 · 0 in / 0 out · 18 embedded · ladder/vectors

@tinysweeper tinysweeper Bot added the priority: p3 Whenever. Cosmetic, a nicety, or a cleanup with no user visible effect. label Sep 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

priority: p3 Whenever. Cosmetic, a nicety, or a cleanup with no user visible effect.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant