Remove reply-quote validation detail from the cryptography primer#293
Merged
santiagomed merged 1 commit intoJul 22, 2026
Merged
Conversation
The paragraph predates the primer rewrite and was merged into it mechanically. The primer is a conceptual page and does not otherwise discuss replies; reply_preview_validation remains fully documented in the Chat XDK reference and in Troubleshooting, where the field-level detail belongs.
|
|
Contributor
|
Docs PR opened: #294 Removed the reply-quote validation paragraph from the X Chat cryptography primer in Japanese, Spanish, Portuguese, and Korean translations. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #273. reply-quote validation edit got merged together with prev commit. Not necessary in this cryptography primer, already documented in the Chat XDK reference and in Troubleshooting, where the field-level detail belongs.