Upgrade portfolio evidence and repair five Pine indicators - #21
Closed
Alaamo7 wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Conversation
Owner
Author
|
Superseded by #22, which reconciled the repaired 120/120 validation evidence onto the latest main baseline and passed Portfolio quality CI before merge. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Validation
python .github/scripts/validate_portfolio.pypasses for 137 Pine filesgit diff --checkpassesNotes
Trading results remain research evidence, not financial advice. This PR is intentionally opened as a draft for review.